Cardiac coping style, heartbeat detection, and the interpretation of cardiac events.
Br J Health Psychol 2004;
6:285-301. [PMID:
14700037 DOI:
10.1348/135910701169214]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Vigilance to, and avoidance of, cardiac sensations and symptoms were explored in three studies.
DESIGN AND METHODS
In the first study, a self-report measure of cardiac vigilance and cardiac avoidance, the Cardiac Coping Inventory (CCI), was administered to 453 students, and its factor structure, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were established. In the second, 31 undergraduates completed the CCI, and their cardioceptive sensitivity was measured on a heartbeat detection task. In a third study of 91 patients with suspected myocardial infarction, the role of coping styles in symptom interpretations was analysed.
RESULTS
Cardiac avoidance and vigilance were independent of general symptom reporting tendencies. Cardiac vigilance was negatively correlated with heartbeat detection. Among the patients, delay in seeking treatment was predicted by the perceived importance of chest pain, which was influenced by the intensity of chest pain and cardiac vigilance.
CONCLUSIONS
Although individuals high in cardiac vigilance do not seem to be good detectors of their heartbeats in the laboratory, they appear to attach importance to heart symptoms in real life, resulting in a health-protective behaviour.
Collapse