Conceptualization of Participation: A Qualitative Synthesis of Brain Injury Stakeholder Perspectives

Background

The return to participation in meaningful life roles for persons with acquired brain injury (pwABI) is a goal shared by pwABI, their families, clinicians, and researchers. Synthesizing how pwABI define participation will help to identify the aspects of participation important to pwABI and can inform a person-centered approach to participation outcome assessment. To-date, the qualitative synthesis approach has been used to explore facilitators and barriers of participation post-stroke, and views about participation among individuals with stroke in the UK.

Objectives

This paper's objectives are to (1) conduct a scoping review of qualitative literature that defines and characterizes participation from the perspective of pwABI of any type, (2) synthesize how pwABI define and categorize participation, and (3) link the themes identified in the qualitative synthesis to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) using standardized linking rules to enhance the comparability of our findings to other types of health information, including standardized outcome measures.

Methods

We completed a scoping review of qualitative literature. Our search included PubMed, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Embase databases and included articles that (1) had qualitative methodology, (2) had a sample ≥50% pwABI, (3) had aims or research questions related to the meaning, definition, perception, or broader experience of participation, and (4) were in English. Qualitative findings were synthesized using Thomas and Harden's methodology and resultant themes were linked to ICF codes.

Results

The search identified 2,670 articles with 2,580 articles excluded during initial screening. The remaining 90 article abstracts were screened, and 6 articles met the full inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis. Four analytical themes emerged: (1) Essential Elements of Participation (2) How pwABI Approach Participation, (3) Where pwABI Participate, and (4) Outcomes of Participation. Each overarching theme included multiple descriptive themes.

Conclusion

In this paper, we identified themes that illustrate key components of participation to pwABI. Our results provide insight into the complex perspectives about participation among pwABI and illustrate aspects of participation that should hold elevated importance for clinicians and researchers supporting participation of pwABI.

Non-ambulatory measures of lower extremity sensorimotor function are associated with walking function in Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Disease progression of multiple sclerosis (MS) is often monitored by ambulatory measures, but how non-ambulatory sensorimotor measures differentially associate to walking measures in MS subtypes is unknown. We determined whether there are characteristic differences between relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), progressive MS (PMS), and non-MS controls in lower extremity sensorimotor function and clinical walking tasks and the sensorimotor associations with walking function in each group.

METHODS

18 RRMS, 13 PMS and 28 non-MS control participants were evaluated in their plantar cutaneous sensitivity (vibration perception threshold, Volts), proprioception during ankle joint position-matching (|∆°| in dorsiflexion), motor coordination (rapid foot-tap count/10 s), and walking function with three tests: Timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) at preferred and fast speeds (s), and timed-up-and-go (TUG, s).

RESULTS

Foot-tapping (p = 0.039, Mean difference (MD)= 5.65 taps) and plantar cutaneous sensation (p = 0.026, MD= -10.30 V) differed between the MS subtypes. For the RRMS group faster walking was related to better proprioceptive function (preferred T25FW: p = 0.019, Root mean square error (RMSE)=1.94; fast T25FW: p = 0.004, RMSE=1.65; TUG: p = 0.001, RMSE=2.12) and foot-tap performance (preferred T25FW: p = 0.033, RMSE = 2.74; fast T25FW: p = 0.010, RMSE=2.02). These associations were not observed in the PMS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Foot-tap performance and plantar cutaneous sensitivity but not ankle proprioception differed between MS subtypes. Lower walking performance was associated with lower foot-tapping and plantar cutaneous sensitivity in the RRMS but not the PMS group. This result suggests a change in the relationship of lower extremity sensorimotor function to walking performance in the PMS subtype.

Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

A sensitive test reflecting subtle sensorimotor changes throughout disease progression independent of mobility impairment is currently lacking in progressive multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES

We examined non-ambulatory measures of upper and lower extremity sensorimotor function that may reveal differences between relapsing-remitting and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

Cutaneous sensitivity, proprioception, central motor function and mobility were assessed in 32 relapsing-remitting and 31 progressive multiple sclerosis patients and 30 non-multiple sclerosis controls.

RESULTS

Cutaneous sensation differed between relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis at the foot and to a lesser extent the hand. Proprioception function in the upper but not the lower extremity differed between relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis, but was different for both upper and lower extremities between multiple sclerosis patients and non-multiple sclerosis controls. Foot-tap but not hand-tap speed was slower in progressive compared to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, suggestive of greater central motor function impairment in the lower extremity in progressive multiple sclerosis. In addition, the non-ambulatory sensorimotor measures were more sensitive in detecting differences between relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis than mobility assessed with the 25-foot walk test.

CONCLUSION

This study provides novel information about changes in sensorimotor function in progressive compared with relapsing-remitting forms of multiple sclerosis, and in particular the importance of assessing both upper and lower extremity function. Importantly, our findings showed loss of proprioceptive function in multiple sclerosis but also in progressive compared to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Examining How Dog 'Acquisition' Affects Physical Activity and Psychosocial Well-Being: Findings from the BuddyStudy Pilot Trial

Dog owners are more physically active than non-dog owners, but evidence of a causal relationship between dog acquisition and increased physical activity is lacking. Such evidence could inform programs and policies that encourage responsible dog ownership. Randomized controlled trials are the 'gold standard' for determining causation, but they are prohibited in this area due to ethical concerns. In the BuddyStudy, we tested the feasibility of using dog fostering as a proxy for dog acquisition, which would allow ethical random assignment. In this single-arm trial, 11 participants fostered a rescue dog for six weeks. Physical activity and psychosocial data were collected at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks. At 6 weeks, mean change in steps/day was 1192.1 ± 2457.8. Mean changes on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the Perceived Stress Scale were -4.9 ± 8.7 and -0.8 ± 5.5, respectively. More than half of participants (55%) reported meeting someone new in their neighborhood because of their foster dog. Eight participants (73%) adopted their foster dog after the 6-week foster period; some maintained improvements in physical activity and well-being at 12 weeks. Given the demonstrated feasibility and preliminary findings of the BuddyStudy, a randomized trial of immediate versus delayed dog fostering is warranted.