Ethical concerns surrounding sex prediction using noninvasive prenatal screening from pediatric endocrinologists' perspective

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) with predicted fetal sex chromosomes included in the results has become increasingly available for pregnant individuals. Predicted fetal sex chromosome results from NIPS are interpreted so as to equate sex chromosomes with sex and gender. As pediatric endocrinologists, we worry about how this use of NIPS harmfully reinforces sex and gender binaries and sets potentially inaccurate assumptions about what the identified chromosomes mean. We use a hypothetical case based on our clinical experience in which the NIPS report of fetal sex does not conform to expectations at birth to highlight ethical concerns surrounding this practice. The use of NIPS for fetal sex chromosome prediction has the potential to perpetuate stigma and bring psychological harm to parents and their future children, particularly those who are intersex, transgender, and gender diverse. The medical community should adopt an approach to the use of NIPS for fetal sex chromosome prediction that recognizes the spectrums of sex and gender to avoid reproducing stigma towards sex- and gender-diverse individuals and associated harms.

Patient and Parent Characteristics Related to Quality of Life and Self-Esteem in Healthy Youth Undergoing Provocative Growth Hormone Testing

OBJECTIVE

To examine how height and youth as well as parenting characteristics associate with quality of life (QoL) and self-esteem among healthy youth undergoing growth evaluation with growth hormone (GH) testing.

STUDY DESIGN

Healthy youth, aged 8-14 years, undergoing provocative GH testing, and a parent completed surveys at or around the time of testing. Surveys collected demographic data; youth and parent reports of youth health-related QoL; youth reports of self-esteem, coping skills, social support, and parental autonomy support; and parent reports of perceived environmental threats and achievement goals for their child. Clinical data were extracted from electronic health records. Univariate models and multivariable linear regressions were used to identify factors associated with QoL and self-esteem.

RESULTS

Sixty youth (mean height z score -2.18 ± 0.61) and their parents participated. On multivariable modeling, youth perceptions of their physical QoL associated with higher grade in school, greater friend and classmate support, and older parent age; youth psychosocial QoL with greater friend and classmate support, and with less disengaged coping; and youth height-related QoL and parental perceptions of youth psychosocial QoL with greater classmate support. Youth self-esteem associated with greater classmate support and taller mid-parental height. Youth height was not associated with QoL or self-esteem outcomes in multivariable regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceived social support and coping skills, rather than height, were related to QoL and self-esteem in healthy short youth and may serve as an important potential area for clinical intervention.

Views on Short Stature of Female Versus Male Endocrine Pediatric Patients Undergoing Provocative Growth Hormone Testing and Their Parents

OBJECTIVE

Boys outnumber girls in short stature evaluations and growth hormone treatment despite absence of gender differences in short stature prevalence. Family views on short stature influence medical management, but gender-based analysis of these views is lacking. This study explored endocrine patients' and their parents' perceptions of short stature and its impact on quality of life by patient gender.

METHODS

Patients aged 8-14 years undergoing provocative growth hormone testing and one parent each completed semi-structured interviews. Clinical data were extracted by chart review.

RESULTS

24 patient-parent dyads (6 female patients, 22 mothers; predominantly non-Hispanic White) participated. Six major themes emerged: 1) patients' perceptions of their short stature were similar by gender, 2) physical experiences of short stature were similar by gender, 3) social experiences of short stature were both similar and different by gender, 4) parental perceptions of short stature as a factor limiting their child's functionality were similar by gender, 5) concern about societal stigma related to short stature arose for both genders, and 6) patients' perceptions of parental messaging about the import of their short stature were similar by gender.

CONCLUSION

Our data reveal more similarities than differences between genders in patient perceptions and patient and parent-reported experiences of short stature. Worry about stature-related stigma was noted for patients of both genders. Parental messaging about short stature emerged as an important area to explore further by patient gender. Our findings suggest that clinicians should be wary of making gender or stigma-based assumptions when evaluating children with short stature.

RF26 | PMON327 Patient and Parent Characteristics Related to Quality of Life and Self-esteem in Healthy Youth Undergoing Provocative GH Testing

Background

Families often seek medical care for a child's short stature due to concerns about how short stature affects psychosocial function in childhood and projected into adulthood. However, height is a poor predictor of psychosocial adjustment, and there is a critical gap in our understanding of how patient and parent characteristics alter the potential impact of being short.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that among healthy youth undergoing medical evaluation for short stature, youth quality of life (QoL) and self-esteem would be associated with youth and parental characteristics rather than height.

Methods

Healthy youth aged 8-14 years who underwent provocative GH testing in our Growth Center and a parent participant each completed surveys at or around the time of testing. Surveys collected demographic data; youth and parent report of youth health-related QoL (PedsQL and Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth [QoLISSY]); youth reports of self-esteem (Self-Perception Profile for Children [SPP]), coping skills (Coping Strategies Inventory), and social support (Social Support Scale for Children); and parent reports of perceived environmental threats (World Out There), goals for their child (Achievement Goals), and autonomy support (Parents As Social Context Questionnaire). Clinical data were extracted from the patients’ electronic health records. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± SD. Univariate models with Holm-Bonferroni correction of significance level 0.05 assessed the marginal effect of each factor on QoL and self-esteem outcomes. Multivariable linear regression models with stepwise selection approaches were used to identify significant predictors of QoL and self-esteem.

Results

Participants included 60 youth (15 female/45 male; age 11.77 ± 1.93 years; 50% prepubertal, 37% Tanner 2, 13% Tanner 3; height Z-score -2.18 ± 0.61) and their parents (55 female/5 male; age 45.65 ± 7.25 years). In multivariable regression, the youth PedsQL physical domain was associated positively with grade in school and perceived friend support. The youth PedsQL psychosocial domain was associated positively with perceived support from classmates and friends, but negatively with disengaged coping. The youth QoLISSY total score was associated positively with perceived support from classmates. Youth's global self-esteem (SPP) was associated positively with perceived classmate support and mid-parental height Z-score. Parent report of youth psychosocial QoL (PedsQL) was associated positively with perceived classmate support. None of the other analogous parent assessment outcomes were associated with the QoL or self-esteem outcomes. Neither youth height nor height Z-score was associated with any of the QoL or self-esteem outcomes.

Conclusions

Perceived social support and coping skills were associated with QoL and self-esteem in healthy short youth, whereas youth height was not, and constitute an important potential area of clinical intervention.

Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m., Monday, June 13, 2022 1:12 p.m. - 1:17 p.m.

Opportunities for Enhanced Transition of Care Preparation for Adolescents and Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Use of the READDY Transition Tool

There is an ongoing need to determine best practices for effective transition from pediatric to adult care for adolescents and emerging adults (EAs) with type 1 diabetes given the potential for poor health outcomes post-transfer. This study evaluated self-reported confidence ratings as measured by the Readiness of Emerging Adults with Diabetes Diagnosed in Youth (READDY) tool among adolescents and EAs with type 1 diabetes and the association of the confidence ratings with clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as provider documentation of relevant anticipatory guidance topics. The READDY is a diabetes-specific tool used to collect patient-reported confidence in transition preparation topics to target educational interventions. These interventions are divided into four domains: Diabetes Knowledge, Health System Navigation, Insulin Self-Management, and Health Behaviors. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients 15-24 years of age with type 1 diabetes who completed the READDY survey between January 2017 and January 2018 at a single center. Overall patient-reported confidence levels were high. However, adolescents and EAs endorsed their lowest levels of confidence on items assessing knowledge of alcohol, tobacco, sexual health, and the impact of diabetes on pregnancy (females only), with the percentages of low scores of 20.7, 25.9, 35.9, and 42.9%, respectively. Documentation of provider counseling about screening and prevention of diabetes comorbidities, alcohol use, and tobacco use was associated with scores in the higher range for the corresponding item in the READDY survey. These findings highlight an opportunity to create interventions related to developmentally important topics for adolescents and EAs with type 1 diabetes to enhance successful transition preparation.

Provocative growth hormone testing in children: how did we get here and where do we go now?

OBJECTIVES

Provocative growth hormone (GH) tests are widely used for diagnosing pediatric GH deficiency (GHD). A thorough understanding of the evidence behind commonly used interpretations and the limitations of these tests is important for improving clinical practice.

CONTENT

To place current practice into a historical context, the supporting evidence behind the use of provocative GH tests is presented. By reviewing GH measurement techniques and examining the early data supporting the most common tests and later studies that compared provocative agents to establish reference ranges, the low sensitivity and specificity of these tests become readily apparent. Studies that assess the effects of patient factors, such as obesity and sex steroids, on GH testing further bring the appropriateness of commonly used cutoffs for diagnosing GHD into question.

SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

Despite the widely recognized poor performance of provocative GH tests in distinguishing GH sufficiency from deficiency, limited progress has been made in improving them. New diagnostic modalities are needed, but until they become available, clinicians can improve the clinical application of provocative GH tests by taking into account the multiple factors that influence their results.

Growth Hormone Stimulation Testing Patterns Contribute to Gender Disparities in Growth Hormone Treatment

Introduction: Growth hormone (GH) registries demonstrate that males outnumber females 2:1 for all indications combined and 3:1 for the idiopathic short stature indication. The aim of this study was to determine if gender disparities in GH treatment are due to differences in rates of stimulation testing and/or GH prescribing. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed including children aged 2-16 years seen for short stature or poor growth in 2012-2019 at a large tertiary referral center. Children previously diagnosed with GHD were excluded. Continuous variables, reported as medians [IQR], were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test and categorical variables by Chi-squared test. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 defined statistical significance. Results: Of 10,125 children seen for evaluation of short stature or poor growth (35% [3542] females [F], 65% [6583] males [M]), 1,245 underwent GH stimulation testing (30% [379] F, 70% [866] M). A larger proportion of males than females were tested (M 13.2%, F 10.7%; p <0.001). Amongst the entire study population, females had lower height Z-scores than males (F -1.98 [-2.46, -1.44], M -1.80 [-2.24, -1.31]; p<0.001). This difference persisted in those who proceeded to GH stimulation testing (F -2.52 [-3.00, -2.04], M -2.18 [-2.6, -1.81]; p<0.001) and GH treatment (F -2.62 [-3.11, -2.07], M -2.19 [-2.60, -1.81; p<0.001). Mean difference between height Z-score and mid-parental height (MPH) Z-score for the entire population did not differ by sex (F -1.52 [-2.17, -0.87], M -1.52 [-2.04, -0.97]; p=0.76), but the difference was greater in females among those who underwent GH stimulation testing (F -1.95 [-2.57, -1.40], M -1.79 [-2.32, -1.32]; p=0.009) and started GH treatment (F -1.93 [-2.58, -1.48], M -1.80 [-2.30, -1.32]; p=0.016). Peak stimulated GH levels were similar for males and females (F 9.6 [6.0, 13.6] ng/mL, M 9.4 [6.1, 13.2] ng/mL, p=0.62). The proportion of children prescribed GH after stimulation testing did not differ by gender (F 55% [208], M 56% [488]; p=0.63). This finding did not change upon sub-analysis by peak stimulated GH concentration groups (peak GH concentrations <7 ng/mL, 7-10 ng/mL, and >10 ng/mL). Conclusion: The male predominance among children seen for subspecialist evaluation of short stature was compounded by a greater proportion of those males subsequently undergoing GH stimulation testing despite less severe short stature. Although females who underwent GH stimulation testing had greater height deficit from their genetic potential than tested males, peak stimulated GH concentrations and GH prescription rates were similar by sex. Thus, gender disparities in GH treatment occur at the subspecialist referral and stimulation testing, but not GH prescription, steps. Further, GH stimulation test results failed to account for the more severe shortness among tested females, yet another limitation identified with such testing.

Growth Hormone Stimulation Testing Patterns Contribute to Sex Differences in Pediatric Growth Hormone Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Males are twice as likely as females to receive pediatric growth hormone (GH) treatment in the USA, despite similar distributions of height z (HtZ)-scores in both sexes. Male predominance in evaluation and subspecialty referral for short stature contributes to this observation. This study investigates whether sex differences in GH stimulation testing and subsequent GH prescription further contribute to male predominance in GH treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted of all individuals, aged 2-16 years, evaluated for short stature or poor growth at a single large tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2019. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed to analyze sex differences.

RESULTS

Of 10,125 children referred for evaluation, a smaller proportion were female (35%). More males (13.1%) than females (10.6%) underwent GH stimulation testing (p < 0.001) and did so at heights closer to average (median HtZ-score -2.2 [interquartile range, IQR -2.6, -1.8] vs. -2.5 [IQR -3.0, -2.0], respectively; p < 0.001). The proportion of GH prescriptions by sex was similar by stimulated peak GH level. Predictor variables in regression modeling differed by sex: commercial insurance predicted GH stimulation testing and GH prescription for males only, whereas lower HtZ-score predicted GH prescription for females only.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex differences in rates of GH stimulation testing but not subsequent GH prescription based on response to GH stimulation testing seem to contribute to male predominance in pediatric GH treatment. That HtZ-score predicted GH prescription in females but not males raises questions about the extent to which sex bias - from children, parents, and/or physicians - as opposed to objective growth data, influence medical decision-making in the evaluation and treatment of short stature.

Influence of Islamic Traditions on Breastfeeding Beliefs and Practices Among African American Muslims in West Philadelphia: A Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the influence of religion on breastfeeding in African American communities. In particular, whether Islamic traditions influence breastfeeding beliefs and practices among African American Muslims has not been studied. Research aim: This study sought to gain understanding of breastfeeding attitudes, rates, and education among African American Muslims in West Philadelphia and to examine if engaging Islamic teachings in breastfeeding education can positively influence breastfeeding attitudes.

METHODS

Open-ended, in-person, digitally recorded qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 community leaders and analyzed by conventional content analysis. A study tool distributed to a convenience sample of 44 community members and 11 leaders was used to gather information about education received from community leaders, breastfeeding attitudes and practices, and the potential for Islamic teachings to positively affect breastfeeding attitudes and practices. To obtain further data on this last topic, preliminary data analysis guided the creation of an education pamphlet, about which feedback was gathered through another study tool.

RESULTS

Education surrounding Islamic perspectives on breastfeeding was not prevalent. African American Muslims in West Philadelphia view breastfeeding favorably and have higher rates of breastfeeding than African Americans as a whole. Community education about breastfeeding that engaged Islamic teachings improved respondents' breastfeeding attitudes.

CONCLUSION

Increasing education among providers and African American Muslims about Islamic perspectives on breastfeeding may improve breastfeeding exclusivity and duration. Healthcare providers who care for Muslim women should be aware of Islam's tradition of positive attitudes toward breastfeeding and partner with Muslim leaders to improve breastfeeding rates and duration among such women.