Validation of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Investigator Global Assessment: A Novel Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Specific Investigator Global Assessment for Use in Interventional Trials

Importance

Few simplified instruments exist for use in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) trials.

Objective

To assess psychometric properties of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Investigator Global Assessment (HS-IGA) score using a clinical trial data set.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective analysis of a phase 2 randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-reference arm trial (UCB HS0001) included adults with moderate-to-severe HS.

Exposures

Trial participants were randomized at baseline to receive bimekizumab, adalimumab, or placebo.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The HS-IGA score at prespecified time points up to 12 weeks after randomization.

Results

The HS-IGA score showed strong convergent validity with IHS4 and HS-PhGA scores at baseline (Spearman correlation, 0.86 [P < .001] and 0.74 [P < .001], respectively) and at week 12 (Spearman correlation, 0.73 [P < .001] and 0.64 [P < .001], respectively). The HS-IGA scores assessed during predosing visits at screening and baseline showed good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.92). At week 12, HS-IGA responders were significantly associated with HiSCR-(50/75/90) responders (χ2 = 18.45; P < .001; χ2 = 18.11; P < .001; and χ2 = 20.83; P < .001, respectively). The HS-IGA score was predictive of HiSCR-50/75/90 and HS-PhGA response at week 12 (AUC, 0.69, 0.73, 0.85, and 0.71, respectively). However, the HS-IGA as a measure of disease activity showed low predictive validity with patient-reported outcomes at week 12.

Conclusions and Relevance

The HS-IGA score demonstrated good psychometric properties compared with existing measures and may be considered for use as an end point in clinical trials for HS.

Cardiovascular outcomes by time-varying New York Heart Association class among patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a retrospective cohort study

AIMS

Assess the relationship between New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the Optum Market Clarity database with linked claims and electronic health records. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with obstructive HCM and ≥1 NYHA class assessment after first HCM diagnosis were eligible (selection period: 2007-2021). Thirteen outcomes were assessed following the index date (first documented NYHA class assessment after first HCM diagnosis in the study period): all-cause mortality; first occurrences of all-cause hospitalization; CV-related hospitalization; primary ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA); myocardial infarction (MI); deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE); and major adverse CV event (MACE); as well as first incident events of atrial fibrillation or flutter; primary ischemic stroke or TIA; heart failure; acute MI; DVT/PE; and a composite endpoint of pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Their associations with the index NYHA class were described using the Kaplan-Meier method (mortality) or cumulative incidence functions (other outcomes). Hazard ratios between NYHA class over time and outcomes were evaluated using time-varying Cox models, adjusting for age at first observed HCM diagnosis, sex, and race.

RESULTS

Among 4,631 eligible patients, the mean age was 59 years at the first observed HCM diagnosis (female, 47%; White, 77%). The risks of all outcomes increased with worse (higher) index NYHA class and worsening NYHA class over time. Deterioration in the NYHA class from the index date was associated with increased risks of outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

The study population may not be representative of all patients with obstructive HCM in the real world. Documented NYHA classes may not fully reflect the longitudinal variation of NYHA class for each patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Worsening NYHA class was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality and CV outcomes in obstructive HCM.

Population estimates of obstructive and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the UK and Germany

Background

While numerous publications have estimated the prevalence of diagnosed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), none have quantified the real-world proportion of obstructive and non-obstructive HCM using nationally representative data sources in any European countries.

Purpose

To estimate the prevalence of diagnosed HCM and its subtypes in the UK and Germany.

Methods

Patients with HCM were identified in the UK from 01 Apr 2009 to 30 Oct 2020 and Germany from 2011 to 2019. UK patients with HCM were identified using electronic health records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) primary care data linked with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) secondary care data using ICD-10 (I42.1, I42.2), Read, Medcode, SNOMED, and OPCS codes. German patients with HCM were identified using a nationally representative administrative claims data pool (WIG2 Benchmark database) from several German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI)-insurances using ICD-10 and OPS codes. Obstructive HCM was identified as any obstructive HCM diagnosis, any HCM diagnosis with septal reduction therapy, and any HCM diagnosis and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO; not in German claims data). Non-obstructive HCM was any non-obstructive or unspecified HCM diagnosis without evidence of any obstructive HCM. Annual prevalence was calculated for each year in the respective study periods and average annual prevalence across the study period.

Results

The average annual prevalence rate of HCM was 4.15/10,000 in the UK and 8.61/10,000 in Germany, while the average annual prevalence rate of obstructive HCM was 2.84/10,000 in the UK and 4.18/10,000 in Germany (Table). The proportion of HCM that was obstructive HCM was 68% in the UK and 49% in Germany. The prevalence rates of diagnosed HCM and obstructive HCM tended to increase over time (Figure).

Conclusion

The prevalence of HCM, obstructive HCM and the proportion of HCM that is obstructive varied between the UK and Germany. The prevalence of HCM was generally consistent with previously published estimates. Although there are limitations with coding in administrative data, it is important to differentiate obstructive HCM from non-obstructive HCM given their unique treatments and disease progression and management, especially since at least 49–68% of HCM is obstructive.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Bristol Myers-Squibb

Development and initial validation of the HS-IGA: a novel hidradenitis suppurativa-specific investigator global assessment for use in interventional trials

BACKGROUND

Few validated instruments exist for use in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) trials.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a novel HS Investigator Global Assessment (HS-IGA) and to validate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

Development of HS-IGA involved discussion among stakeholders, including patients, within HISTORIC. Data from replicate phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating HS treatment were utilized. Multivariate models identified lesion type and body region as variables of importance. Classification and regression trees for ordinal responses were built. Validation included assessment of test-retest reliability, predictive validity, responsiveness and clinical meaningfulness.

RESULTS

There were 3024 unique measurements available in PIONEER I. Mean and median lesion counts by region were largely <10 and were highest in axillary and inguinal regions. The mean and median number of regions involved were ≤ 3 for individual lesions and combinations. Regardless of lesion type, axillary and inguinal regions most influenced the HS-IGA score. Accordingly, regions were combined into a six-point IGA based on the maximum lesion number in either upper or lower body regions with a score of 0 (0-1 lesions), 1 (2-5), 2 (6-10), 3 (11-15), 4 (16-20) and 5 (≥ 20 lesions). The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0·91 (95% confidence interval 0·87-0·94). Spearman's rank order correlations (SROCs) with HS-PGA and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) were 0·73 and 0·51, respectively (P < 0·001 for both comparisons). SROCs with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), pain numerical rating scale and HS-QoL were 0·42, 0·34 and -0·25, respectively (P < 0·001 for all comparisons). HS-IGA was responsive at weeks 12 and 36. Predictive convergent validity was very good with HS-PGA (area under the curve = 0·89) and with HiSCR (area under the curve = 0·82). Predictive divergent validity was low with DLQI and HS-QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

HS-IGA has moderate-to-strong psychometric properties and is simple to calculate.

Generating Appropriate and Reliable Evidence for Value Assessment of Medical Devices: An Ispor Medical Devices and Diagnostics Special Interest Group Report

Background: Health Technology Assessment methods have become an important health policy tool. Yet recommendations for what constitutes appropriate and reliable evidence for assessment of medical devices are still debated because methods to evaluate pharmaceuticals are often, and incorrectly, the starting point for assessments.

Objectives:

The study aims to: (i) propose recommendations on appropriate methodologies to assess the evidence on medical devices (ii) identify assessment methods that can be used to measure device value and (iii) suggest key areas for future work

Methods:

ISPOR's Medical Devices and Diagnostics Special Interest Group conducted a comprehensive search of databases and gray literature on evidence development and value assessment on medical devices. The literature search was supplemented with hand searching from high impact journals in the related field. The 10-person expert working group obtained written comments through multiple rounds of review from internal and external stakeholders. Recommendations were made to guide future research.

Results:

Multi-criteria decision analysis was identified as a useful approach to assess the value of treatment. Consideration should be given to resource use measures; valid and reliable functional status questionnaires; and general and disease-specific, health-related, quality-of-life measures in economic evaluations of device use. For future work, best practices for value framework design.

Conclusions:

Integration of value-based evidence in an evidence-generation and -synthesis process is needed to support market access and adoption. Methodological recommendations for measuring value can be challenging when the selection of domains and assessment of value are not device-specific.

Effect of Risankizumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: The UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 Randomized Clinical Trials

Question

What are the patient-reported outcomes of risankizumab treatment for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis in UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2?

Findings

Data from 997 patients who were randomized 3:1:1 to risankizumab, ustekinumab, and placebo in 2 replicate 52-week clinical trials showed a superior and statistically significant effect of risankizumab compared with placebo and ustekinumab in relieving and eliminating plaque psoriasis symptoms, improving health-related quality of life, and reducing psychological distress, with both a quick onset and sustaining of benefits over the long term.

Meaning

Risankizumab is an efficacious novel biologic treatment with meaningful improvements in symptoms, mental health, and quality of life for patients with psoriasis.

Importance

Demonstrating the value of therapies from a patient’s perspective is increasingly important for patient-centered care.

Objective

To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with risankizumab vs ustekinumab and placebo in psoriasis symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and mental health among patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 studies were replicate 52-week phase 3, randomized, multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled trials conducted in 139 sites (including hospitals, academic medical centers, clinical research units, and private practices) globally in Asia-Pacific, Japan, Europe, and North America. Adults (≥18 years) with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis with body surface area (BSA) involvement of 10% or more, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores of 12 or higher, and static Physician’s Global Assessment (sPGA) scores of 3 or higher were included.

Interventions

In each trial, patients were randomly assigned (3:1:1) to 150 mg of risankizumab, 45 mg or 90 mg of ustekinumab (weight-based per label) for 52 weeks, or matching placebo for 16 weeks followed by risankizumab.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Integrated data from 2 trials were used to compare Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) (total score and item scores for pain, redness, itchiness, and burning), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), 5-level EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D-5L), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), at baseline, week 16, and week 52.

Results

A total of 997 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis were analyzed. Across all arms, the mean age was 47.2 to 47.8 years and 68.3% (136/199 for ustekinumab) to 73.0% (146/200 for placebo) were men. Patients’ characteristics and PROs were comparable across all treatment arms at baseline (n = 598, 199, 200 for risankizumab, ustekinumab, and placebo, respectively). At week 16, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with risankizumab than those treated with ustekinumab or placebo achieved PSS = 0, indicating no psoriasis symptoms (30.3% [181/598], 15.1% [30/199], 1.0% [2/200], both P < .001), and DLQI = 0 or 1 indicating no impact on skin-related HRQL (66.2%, 44.7%, 6.0%, P < .001). Significantly greater proportions of patients treated with risankizumab achieved minimally clinically important difference (MCID) than ustekinumab or placebo for DLQI (94.5% [516/546], 85.1% [149/175], 35.6% [64/180]; both P < .001), EQ-5D-5L (41.7% [249/597] vs 31.5% [62/197], P = .01; vs 19.0% [38/200], P < .001), and HADS (anxiety: 69.1% [381/551] vs 57.1% [104/182], P = .004; vs 35.9% [66/184], P < .001; depression: 71.1% [354/598] vs 60.4% [96/159], P = .01; vs 37.1% [59/159], P < .001). At week 52, improvements in patients treated with risankizumab compared with those treated with ustekinumab were sustained for PSS, DLQI, and EQ-5D-5L.

Conclusions and Relevance

Risankizumab significantly improved symptoms of moderate to severe psoriasis, improved HRQL, and reduced psychological distress compared with ustekinumab or placebo.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02684370 (UltIMMa-1) and NCT02684357 (UltIMMa-2)

Reliability, validity, and the ability to detect change of the Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) in patients with plaque psoriasis

Introduction: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the measurement properties of the patient-reported four-item Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS).Methods: Analysis of phase-III data on the efficacy of risankizumab to assess psychometric characteristics of the PSS in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.Results: PSS items had a good range of symptom severity coverage. The PSS had good test-retest reliability (ICCs >0.90). Convergent and discriminant validity was indicated by moderate-to-strong correlations between the PSS and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), PSS pain item and EQ-5D pain/discomfort item at week 12 (0.63), and moderate negative correlation with EQ-Visual Analog Scale score at week 12 (-0.37). Known groups validity demonstrated as mean PSS total scores varied by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) defined groups (p < .0001). PSS total scores were responsive to changes in PASI score (p < .0001) and sPGA (p < .0001). PSS minimal, clinical, and meaningful change is estimated to be 1 to 2 points; a preliminary responder definition is a total change score of 3 to 4 points.Conclusions: The PSS is a short, valid unidimensional measure of psoriasis symptom severity, well suited for use in clinical trials.

Cost-effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention

Antiplatelet therapy is recommended over anticoagulants for the secondary prevention of vascular death in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack based upon the 2006 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines for the prevention of stroke and the National Stroke Association guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attack. Aspirin is commonly used as a cornerstone antiplatelet agent considering its mild but definite prevention benefit and low costs. Other antiplatelet strategies that are currently recommended include extended-release dipyridamole plus low-dose aspirin (Aggrenox((R)), Asasantin((R))) and clopidogrel. In this brief review, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antiplatelet agents for secondary stroke prevention to better understand the socioeconomical value of the recommended agents.