Management of Fatigue in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO-Society for Integrative Oncology Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To update the ASCO guideline on the management of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in adult survivors of cancer.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncology, geriatric oncology, internal medicine, psychology, psychiatry, exercise oncology, integrative medicine, behavioral oncology, nursing, and advocacy experts was convened. Guideline development involved a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 2013-2023.

RESULTS

The evidence base consisted of 113 RCTs. Exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and mindfulness-based programs led to improvements in CRF both during and after the completion of cancer treatment. Tai chi, qigong, and American ginseng showed benefits during treatment, whereas yoga, acupressure, and moxibustion helped to manage CRF after completion of treatment. Use of other dietary supplements did not improve CRF during or after cancer treatment. In patients at the end of life, CBT and corticosteroids showed benefits. Certainty and quality of evidence were low to moderate for CRF management interventions.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Clinicians should recommend exercise, CBT, mindfulness-based programs, and tai chi or qigong to reduce the severity of fatigue during cancer treatment. Psychoeducation and American ginseng may be recommended in adults undergoing cancer treatment. For survivors after completion of treatment, clinicians should recommend exercise, CBT, and mindfulness-based programs; in particular, CBT and mindfulness-based programs have shown efficacy for managing moderate to severe fatigue after treatment. Yoga, acupressure, and moxibustion may also be recommended. Patients at the end of life may be offered CBT and corticosteroids. Clinicians should not recommend L-carnitine, antidepressants, wakefulness agents, or routinely recommend psychostimulants to manage symptoms of CRF. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations for or against other psychosocial, integrative, or pharmacological interventions for the management of fatigue.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastrointestinal cancer (GICA) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Data from randomized clinical trials in cancer-associated VTE suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) conferred similar or superior efficacy but a heterogeneous safety profile in patients with GICA. We compared the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in patients with GICA and VTE at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of patients with GICA and VTE receiving treatment with DOACs for a minimum of 6 months. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients experiencing major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and recurrent VTE. Secondary outcomes were time to bleeding and recurrent VTE.

RESULTS

A cohort of 433 patients with GICA who were prescribed apixaban (n = 300), or rivaroxaban (n = 133) were included. MB occurred in 3.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-5.9), CRNMB in 5.3% (95% CI 3.4-7.9), and recurrent VTE in 7.4% (95% CI 5.1-10.3). The cumulative incidence rates of CRNMB and recurrent VTE were not significantly different when comparing apixaban to rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSION

Apixaban and rivaroxaban had a similar risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding and could be considered as anticoagulant options in selected patients with GICA and VTE.

Electronic health records analytics to identify cancer patients with metabolic syndrome

e18649

Background: Metabolic syndrome, defined as the presence of at least 3 of 5 clinical factors including hypertension, elevated triglyceride levels, low high-density lipoprotein level, insulin resistance, and central obesity, increases the risk of heart disease, fatty liver, and multiple cancers. Metabolic syndrome in cancer patients has been associated with poor cancer-specific and overall survival. Lifestyle modification in patients with metabolic syndrome may reduce the risk of poor outcomes. In this quality improvement project, we aimed to determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among cancer patients and survivors seen in an outpatient general internal medicine (GIM) clinic and to determine the feasibility of using electronic health records (EHR) analytics to systematically identify such patients and refer them to lifestyle interventions and liver imaging. Methods: Study period was January-December 2021. During this period, an EHR algorithm was used to identify patients with metabolic syndrome based on the presence of ICD-10 diagnoses of metabolic conditions (diabetes, hypertension, lipid disease, and obesity). This algorithm was used to direct data from patient visits into an interactive dashboard to track metabolic syndrome prevalence and continuously monitor referrals to interventions. In September 2021, a best practice alert based on the EHR algorithm was created to identify patients with metabolic syndrome and prompt providers to refer them to nutrition counseling, liver ultrasound with elastography, and/or a community-based active-living support group for cancer survivors. GIM clinic nurses also reviewed medications and utilized an EPIC SmartPhrase that incorporated laboratory values (e.g., glucose, A1c, and lipids), blood pressure, and body mass index to confirm whether patients actually met the criteria for metabolic syndrome, and if so, they notified medical providers who then ordered the interventions. Patients confirmed to have metabolic syndrome received educational materials about lifestyle modifications. Data extracted from the dashboard were analyzed using Minitab 17 statistical software. Results: Among 1133 patients seen in the GIM clinic during 2021, 609 (54%) had metabolic syndrome. A total of 1045 patients (92%) had hypertension, 802 (71%) had hyperlipidemia, 571 (50%) had obesity, and 483 (43%) had diabetes. Among the 609 patients with metabolic syndrome, 148 (24%) were referred to liver ultrasound with elastography, 124 (20%) to nutrition counseling, and 21 (3%) to the support group. Beginning September 1, the best practice alert was triggered for 1131 clinical encounters meeting criteria for metabolic syndrome. Conclusions: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome among cancer patients seen in a GIM clinic was high. EHR analytics can lead to systematic identification and referral of patients with metabolic syndrome to lifestyle interventions and liver imaging.

Literature Review of Fatigue Scales and Association with Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Outcomes Among Patients With and Without Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Introduction

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare blood disorder characterized by anemia and debilitating fatigue. Limited evidence characterizes the association between hemoglobin, an indicator of anemia and disease activity, and patient-reported fatigue scales. This review identifies benchmarks for clinically meaningful improvements in patients with and without PNH.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and PsycINFO databases were searched along with Google Scholar to identify publications for patients with and without PNH. Full-text articles and conference abstracts of clinical trials or observational studies that examined patient-reported fatigue or associations between fatigue and hemoglobin were included.

Results

Fourteen publications were included in this study. Four clinical trials conducted in patients with PNH reported that patients achieved and sustained clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue. However, these studies did not examine the association between fatigue and hemoglobin. Ten studies conducted in patients with cancer and anemia (with or without chemotherapy) demonstrated an association between increased hemoglobin and improvements in fatigue (P < 0.05). The greatest incremental gain in fatigue improvement was observed when hemoglobin increased from 11 to 12 g/dL.

Conclusion

Evidence among patients with cancer without PNH demonstrates that increased hemoglobin levels are associated with clinically significant improvements in fatigue. Future studies should validate this relationship among patients with PNH.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02111-7.

Handoff Tool Enabling Standardized Transitions Between the Emergency Department and the Hospitalist Inpatient Service at a Major Cancer Center

Communication failures during patient handoff can lead to serious errors. A quality improvement team created a standardized handoff tool/process (DE-PASS: Decisive problem requiring admission, Evaluation time, Patient summary, Acute issues/action list, Situation unfinished/awareness, Signed out to) for admitting patients from the emergency department (ED) to the hospitalist inpatient service of a tertiary cancer center. DE-PASS mirrors the institution's ED workflow, stratifies patients as stable/urgent/emergent, and establishes requirements for verbal and email communications between providers. Comparison of preintervention and postintervention results from the 1-month pilot revealed that within a 24-hour period, DE-PASS reduced the number of intensive care unit transfers by 58% ( P = .393), the number of rapid-response team calls by 39% ( P = .637), and time to inpatient order by 31% ( P = .004). ED physicians' and hospitalists' satisfaction with DE-PASS increased. Reduction in intensive care unit transfers was sustained after the pilot ( P = .029). DE-PASS feasibility was evidenced by 100% uptake. By stratifying patients by risk level, DE-PASS reduced admission-to-evaluation times for unstable patients, potentially improving patient safety.

Utilizing electronic technologies to measure patient-reported outcomes (PRO) assessment completion time

69

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) contribute to the assessment and treatment of cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Paper-based symptom assessments are cumbersome and time-consuming. Electronic assessments are an efficient alternative. This study describes CRF Clinic patients at a major cancer Institution, the time they required to complete self-reported CRF symptom assessments via a tablet computer (iPad), and the factors influencing PRO assessment completion time. Methods: From 1/1/2011 to 8/21/2012, 190 newly-referred CRF Clinic patients utilized an iPad to complete standardized CRF symptom assessments for: fatigue, pain, depression, anxiety, stress, sleepiness, and apathy. A web-based assessment module (BrightOutcome) was employed, which recorded assessment start and completion times. Non-Parametric test statistics were utilized for analysis. Results: Of the initial 190 patients, 3 were excluded due to non-cancer diagnoses and 1 was excluded due to an erroneous completion time of 8,903 minutes. Sample size is 186 patients; mean age was 55.49 years (range: 31-89); 69.4% (n = 119) were female. Patient mean fatigue score (Brief Fatigue Inventory) was 6.4. Mean assessment completion time was 16.73 minutes (range: 4-47). Assessments took longer to complete for patients ≥ 65 years (mean: 21.53 minutes; range: 9-43), males (mean of 18.3 vs. 16 minutes for females), patients with severe fatigue (7-10) (mean 18.31 minutes; range: 4-47), greatest apathy (38-72) (mean: 19.5 minutes; range 8-47), those with active cancer (mean: 18.02 minutes vs. 15.15 minutes in cancer survivors), and those with 2 or more comorbidities (mean: 18.41 minutes vs. 15.86 minutes in those with less than 2 comorbidities). Pain severity and interference, anxiety, depression, stress, and sleepiness did not statistically significantly impact assessment completion time. Conclusions: Patients who are older, male, fatigued, apathetic, with active cancer or with 2 or more comorbidities may require longer in-clinic time to complete standard symptom assessments. Further studies exploring these and other patient characteristics potentially impacting the integration of new technologies into patient care and research are warranted.

Practice patterns and outcomes of rivaroxaban usage in patients with cancer

194

Background: Patients with cancer have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and frequently require anticoagulation. In addition, many patients with cancer also have comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation (AF) and are on stroke prevention. Rivaroxaban (RV) is an oral (factor Xa inhibitor) used in these scenarios; however, there is little experience utilizing this agent in patients with cancer. Our aim is to describe practice patterns and outcomes of RV usage in patients with cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 62 patients with cancer receiving RV for at least 5 days for VTE or non-valvular AF from 1/1/2012 through 10/31/2015. Practice patterns included RV perioperative use and blood and platelet transfusions. Outcomes of interest were recurrent VTE and bleeding. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize demographic and clinical variables. Results: Of 62 patients with cancer, the mean age was 62 years (range 31-83), 50% were male, and 77% white. The most common cancer types were gastrointestinal 9 (15%), sarcoma 9 (15%), and breast and hematologic each with 8 (13%). Of those, 49 (79%) had VTE, 9 AF (15%), and 4 (7%) had both. 42 (68%) patients were switched to RV from a prior anticoagulant, the majority from low molecular weight heparin. 22 (36%) had RV withheld temporarily; 15 due to surgical procedure and 5 due to bleeding. 5 (33%) received bridging anticoagulation prior to surgery. RV was held a mean of 2 days prior to surgery and resumed 9 days post-op. 14 (21%) received blood and 2 (3%) received platelet transfusions while on RV. 2 (3%) patients had VTE recurrence while on RV. 18 (29%) discontinued RV due to bleeding, 5 (28%) due to hematuria and only 1 patient due to thrombocytopenia (6%). There were no major bleeds or deaths related to RV. Conclusions: RV was used in solid and hematologic cancers. The majority were transitioned from another anticoagulant. Although VTE recurrence was low, discontinuation of RV due to bleeding was higher. Further study of the use of RV in patients with cancer is needed for continued guidance of appropriate and safe usage.

Meta-analysis of cardiovascular toxicity risks in cancer patients on selected targeted agents

PURPOSE

The purpose was to estimate the risk and severity of cardiovascular toxicities associated with selected targeted agents.

METHODS

We searched English-language literature for randomized clinical trials published between January 1, 2000 and November 30, 2013 of targeted cancer therapy drugs approved by the FDA by November 2010. One hundred ten studies were eligible. Using meta-analytic methods, we calculated the relative risks of several cardiovascular toxicities [congestive heart failure (CHF), decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (DLVEF), myocardial infarction (MI), arrhythmia, and hypertension (HTN)], adjusting for sample size using the inverse-variance technique. For each targeted agent and side effect, we calculated the number needed to harm.

RESULTS

Regarding CHF, trastuzumab showed significantly greater risk of all-grade and high-grade CHF. There was significant increased risk of all-grade DLVEF with sorafenib, sunitinib, and trastuzumab and high-grade DLVEF with bevacizumab and trastuzumab. Sorafenib was associated with significant increased all-grade risk of MI based on one study. None was associated with high-grade risk of MI or increased risk of arrhythmia. Bevacizumab, sorafenib, and sunitinib had significant increased risk of all-grade and high-grade HTN.

CONCLUSIONS

Several of the targeted agents were significantly associated with increased risk of specific cardiovascular toxicities, CHF, DLVEF, and HTN. Several had significant increased risk for high-grade cardiovascular toxicities (CHF, DLVEF, and HTN). Patients receiving such therapy should be closely monitored for these toxicities and early and aggressive treatment should occur. However, clinical experience has demonstrated that some of these toxicities may be reversible and due to secondary effects.

Safer transitions of care at a major cancer center: The emergency center to hospitalist experience

247

Background: Failures in communication lead to serious medical errors particularly during transitions of care. A standardized handoff of patients requiring admission to the inpatient setting between the Emergency Center (EC) and the Hospitalist Inpatient Service (HIS) at a comprehensive cancer center was lacking during this vulnerable time. Methods: A quality pilot study using Plan, Do, Study, Act methodology was conducted. First, root cause analysis and process mapping of the current state was performed to identify pitfalls of the handoff process between the EC and the Hospitalist Service. Second, a validated standardized handoff tool, “I-PASS” (Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situational awareness and contingency planning, and Synthesis by receiver) was selected and then transformed to DE-PASS, where D stands for Decisive problem requiring admission and E for Evaluation, to suit the EC workflow. The DE-PASS identified patients at higher risk for complications as urgent and emergent in the evaluation section and required a verbal communication in addition to an email using DE-PASS format. Third, we measured pre versus post intervention impact metrics. ICU transfers and Rescue Team calls within 24 hours were obtained from 822 patients. Time interval between EC admission physician order and HIS order was analyzed in a population of 174 randomly selected patients. Provider satisfaction with handoffs was surveyed. Results: The DE-PASS utilization ranged from 75% to 100% by the end of the pilot. The data analysis revealed a 60% reduction in the number of ICU transfers and a 64% reduction of Rescue Team calls post intervention. There was an 18% reduction in the interval time for an inpatient order in the medical record. EC Physicians satisfaction with DE-PASS increased by 10% and the Hospitalists increased by 40%. Conclusions: Implementation of the standardized handoff tool DE-PASS led to improved communication between two clinical services of a major cancer center. Patients’ safety improved by designation of risk stratification and reducing the time to evaluate unstable patients by the receiving HIS. Physician’s satisfaction with the handoff process increased.

Improving transitions of care through implementation of a standardized handoff at a comprehensive cancer center

242

Background: Communication failures cause two-thirds of sentinel events in hospitals. These adverse occurrences are often both fatal and preventable. Consequently, improving the quality of handoffs has been identified by multiple accreditation constituents as a top priority patient safety goal. This project was part of an institutional initiative to standardize handoffs among physicians, trainees, and midlevel providers. Methods: Four subgroups were identified as pilot areas: Gynecologic Oncology (Gyn Onc) fellows to nocturnalists, Surgical Oncology fellows, Pediatric Oncology residents and fellows, and Emergency Center attending staff to inpatient hospitalists. This abstract focuses on the Gyn Onc and Pediatric Oncology services. All teams used a PDSA cycle (Plan, Do, Study, Act) to conduct its pilot study. A gap analysis, root cause analysis, and process mapping were performed in each area to identify specific handoff issues. A validated standardized handoff tool, I-PASS (Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situational awareness and contingency planning, and Synthesis by receiver), was selected. Of note, “Illness severity” highlights patients identified at higher risk for complications and denotes their status as “watcher” or “unstable.” Interventions included I-PASS skills training and utilization of the I-PASS mnemonic. Each service developed a standardized definition to identify patients classified as “watchers.” Medical errors, ICU transfers, and provider satisfaction were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results: Results from 40 handoff surveys showed communication errors dropped by 10% (16.49 vs 14.93). Minor harm as result of a problematic handoff decreased by 45% (2.55 vs 1.39), with a 55% reduction in ICU transfers. There was an overall increase in handoff satisfaction using I-PASS and 100% standardization of handoffs across the Gyn Onc and Pediatric Oncology units. Conclusions: Implementation of I-PASS, a validated standardized handoff was associated with reductions in medical errors and improvement in communication. Our institution is moving toward implementing I-PASS across all units to increase the safety and quality of patient care.

Meta-analysis: Risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) in selected targeted agents

64

Background: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is among the most serious cardiovascular side effects of targeted agents (TA) impacting the clinical outcomes (including survival) of cancer patients on this therapy. Although clinical trials have reported this toxicity, often sample sizes are small and systemic evaluations are lacking. The objective of this study is to estimate risk and severity of CHF due to selected TAs. Methods: We identified 110 English language studies of 26 TA’s approved by the Food and Drug Administration as of November 2013 via MEDLINE. Of those, 8 studies including nearly 8000 patients provided TA-related data on the incidence and severity of CHF. Using meta-analytic methods, we calculated the relative risks of CHF, adjusting for sample size using the inverse variance technique. For each TA, we also determined the number needed to harm. Results: See table. Conclusions: In 5 studies including more than 7,000 patients, trastuzumab showed significantly greater risk of CHF. For every 9 patients treated with trastuzumab, there was 1 additional case of CHF compared to control regimens. A careful patient selection before therapy and early detection of CHF by judicious monitoring of patients on this therapy may prevent serious complications and allow maintenance of cancer treatment. [Table: see text]

Screening, assessment, and management of fatigue in adult survivors of cancer: an American Society of Clinical oncology clinical practice guideline adaptation

PURPOSE

This guideline presents screening, assessment, and treatment approaches for the management of adult cancer survivors who are experiencing symptoms of fatigue after completion of primary treatment.

METHODS

A systematic search of clinical practice guideline databases, guideline developer Web sites, and published health literature identified the pan-Canadian guideline on screening, assessment, and care of cancer-related fatigue in adults with cancer, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cancer-Related Fatigue and the NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship. These three guidelines were appraised and selected for adaptation.

RESULTS

It is recommended that all patients with cancer be evaluated for the presence of fatigue after completion of primary treatment and be offered specific information and strategies for fatigue management. For those who report moderate to severe fatigue, comprehensive assessment should be conducted, and medical and treatable contributing factors should be addressed. In terms of treatment strategies, evidence indicates that physical activity interventions, psychosocial interventions, and mind-body interventions may reduce cancer-related fatigue in post-treatment patients. There is limited evidence for use of psychostimulants in the management of fatigue in patients who are disease free after active treatment.

CONCLUSION

Fatigue is prevalent in cancer survivors and often causes significant disruption in functioning and quality of life. Regular screening, assessment, and education and appropriate treatment of fatigue are important in managing this distressing symptom. Given the multiple factors contributing to post-treatment fatigue, interventions should be tailored to each patient's specific needs. In particular, a number of nonpharmacologic treatment approaches have demonstrated efficacy in cancer survivors.

Chronic conditions and health status in older cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

With the aging population and improved cancer care, the number of cancer survivors is steadily increasing. Planning for their care requires an understanding of the impact of cancer and chronic conditions on quality of life. We sought to determine chronic conditions and health status in older cancer survivors compared to controls.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we used survey data from 18,133 cancer survivors and 94,407 controls age 65 and older who participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2009 telephonic survey. Our main measures were chronic conditions (cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, high cholesterol, and arthritis) and poor health status (poor or fair self-rated health).

RESULTS

Cancer survivors were older, more likely white, had higher education, and slightly more likely to have a healthcare provider and higher levels of emotional support. More survivors reported having 2 or more chronic conditions compared to controls (67.5% vs. 64.5%, respectively). Health status was lower for survivors, and was significantly different by racial/ethnic group. In a multivariable model for health status, having 2 or more chronic conditions was more strongly associated with poorer health status than cancer survivorship.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors had slightly higher numbers of chronic conditions and poorer health status than controls. However, chronic conditions were more strongly associated with poor health status than cancer. Monitoring for recurrence and second cancers is important in cancer survivors, but chronic conditions also need to be given priority due to their substantial impact on health status.

Practice patterns of bevacizumab-induced hypertension in cancer patients

e20664

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors such as bevacizumab (BV) can result in side-effects such as hypertension (HTN), proteinuria and acute kidney injury (AKI). The objectives are to evaluate practice patterns of BV-induced HTN; to assess frequency of BV dose reduction, withdrawal and delay due to HTN, proteinuria and AKI; and to determine the time course for initial resolution of BV-induced HTN, proteinuria and AKI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed random charts of 75 cancer patients (pts) treated with BV from 1/1/2009 to 9/30/2011. This included demographic, clinical and outcome parameters. Descriptive statistics were utilized. Results: 37 (56%) were males with median age 56 years (range 19-84). Most had lung (14, 19%), breast (11, 15%), and colorectal cancer (10, 13%). 69 (92%)had metastatic disease. 70 (93%) pts were on BV with other antineoplastic agents. 37 (49%) had a diagnosis of HTN at study entry. The median days from first BV treatment (tx) to first hypertensive reading was 7 (0-279) and days to receiving new or dose increase of HTN meds was 49 (0-283). 44 (59%) pts had 2 consecutive readings ≥ 140 or ≥ 90 mmHg during BV tx and 49 (65%) during post-tx follow-up of 6 months or less. 14 pts received new or dose increase of HTN meds during tx. The most frequent HTN meds used were diuretics (26%), beta blockers (21%) and calcium channel blockers (17%). The average number of new HTN meds at last BV tx was 1.5. No pt had BV dose reduced due to HTN, proteinuria or AKI. BV was withdrawn in 2 (3%) due to HTN, 2 (3%) due to proteinuria and 1 (1%) due to AKI. 5 pts had a delay due to HTN (4) and AKI (1). 57% (8 /14) of pts receiving additional HTN meds during BV tx had first dose decrease of additional HTN meds post-tx at a median of 30.5 (11-162) days. The median number of days to resolve first proteinuria and first AKI was 20 (1-193) and 14 (0-34) days, respectively. Conclusions: HTN occurred in a majority with few receiving extra HTN meds although meeting HTN criteria. Patients continued to have HTN post-tx. However, despite HTN, few stopped BV due to cardiovascular events. Further education regarding HTN guidelines may be necessary and should be considered.

A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of a sustained release methylphenidate in cancer-related fatigue

9072

Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is common and distressing. This study assessed the efficacy of OROS methylphenidate 18 mg daily (OM) vs. placebo (P) for CRF reduction. Other objectives were to compare the effects of OM vs. P on other symptoms, cognitive function, work yield, patient (pt) perceptions and preferences, and an exploratory analysis of cytokines. Methods: Initially, pts were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive OM-P or P-OM for 4 weeks (wks). Pts were crossed to the other treatment after 2 wks. Assessments were done at baseline, 2 and 4 wks. Continuous and categorical variables were assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and McNemar tests, respectively. The primary efficacy end point was the change of “fatigue worst” on the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at the end of each 2 wk period. Results: 42 female breast cancer pts were enrolled (3 ineligible, 6 unevaluable); 33 pts were studied. The mean age was 58 (range, 32-79), 30% had metastasis, 82% were receiving chemotherapy (ctx), 9% hormonal therapy (ht), and 9% both ctx and ht. 94% were ECOG <1 and 52% were employed. 45% were on pain medicines and none on antidepressants. The mean baseline BFI was 5.7 (range 4.1-8.6). Fatigue worst did not differ between OM and P (p= 0.54) or in other symptoms. There was significance in WAIS-III Digit Symbol between OM and P (p=0.01), and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test with BFI interfere and BFI active (p=0.04, p=0.03, respectively). Hours (hrs) missed due to health (p=0.03) and hrs worked (p=0.04) differed in OM vs. P. At study end, pts were asked if OM improved CRF and if they wanted to stay on OM. 64% felt improved. Of these, 58% wanted to continue. There were no serious adverse events due to OM. There were differences in serum IL6 (p=0.03), IL10 (p=0.0004), and TNFα (p=0.02) among OM and P. Conclusions: Low dose OM did not show improvement in CRF on fatigue worst of BFI. Pts taking OM had better cognition and less work absences. Pts tolerated OM well and a majority felt better and wanted to continue OM. Future studies examining higher doses or longer treatment duration with OM, pt preferences and impact on productivity are necessary. Changes in serum cytokine levels should be further explored.

A randomized phase II trial of apixaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with metastatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are at increased risk for thrombosis. Apixaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, is oral and does not require laboratory monitoring.

OBJECTIVES

A pilot study was conducted to evaluate whether apixaban would be well tolerated and acceptable in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Subjects receiving either first-line or second-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic lung, breast, gastrointestinal, bladder, ovarian or prostate cancers, cancer of unknown origin, myeloma or selected lymphomas were randomized to 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg once daily of apixaban or placebo in a double-blind manner for 12 weeks. Use of the study drug began within 4 weeks of the start of chemotherapy. The primary outcome was either major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Secondary outcomes included venous thromboembolism (VTE) and grade III or higher adverse events related to the study drug. Thirty-two patients received 5 mg, 30 patients 10 mg, 33 patients 20 mg, and 30 patients placebo. In these groups, there were 0, 0, 2 and 1 major bleeds, respectively. The corresponding data for CRNM bleeds were 1, 1, 2, and 0. The rate of major bleeding in the 93 apixaban patients was 2.2% (95% confidence interval 0.26-7.5%). There were no fatal bleeds. Three placebo patients had symptomatic VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

Apixaban was well tolerated in our study population. These results support further study of apixaban in phase III trials to prevent VTE in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Outcomes of a cancer-related fatigue clinic in a comprehensive cancer center

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a significant issue for cancer patients and frequently precipitates increased stress and anxiety for patients and caregivers alike. CRF may present well after the initial phase of cancer diagnosis and treatment, regardless of whether the cancer is in remission, widely metastatic, or somewhere in between. Determining whether the etiology of fatigue is potentially reversible and whether it is an effect of treatment or another unrelated cause is often perplexing. Because of the significant impact of CRF on patients at our institution, we organized a CRF clinic and began evaluating patients for fatigue in 1998. Our goal has been to initiate a more focused and, at the same time, more comprehensive effort in educating, evaluating, and treating CRF. The purpose of this report was to present a retrospective review of patients treated in our CRF clinic between 1998 and 2005, to examine the outcomes of our patients, and to briefly describe some of the challenges encountered in treating these patients. This information may help reassess and improve approaches in addressing CRF and subsequently improve fatigue in these patients.

Outcomes and cost of outpatient or inpatient management of 712 patients with febrile neutropenia

PURPOSE

We retrospectively compared the outcomes and costs of outpatient and inpatient management of low-risk outpatients who presented to an emergency department with febrile neutropenia (FN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single episode of FN was randomly chosen from each of 712 consecutive, low-risk solid tumor outpatients who had been treated prospectively on a clinical pathway (1997-2003). Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively for overall success (resolution of all signs and symptoms of infection without modification of antibiotics, major medical complications, or intensive care unit admission) and nine secondary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed by physician investigators who were blinded to management strategy. Outcomes and costs (payer's perspective) in 529 low-risk outpatients were compared with 123 low-risk patients who were psychosocially ineligible for outpatient management (no access to caregiver, telephone, or transportation; residence > 30 minutes from treating center; poor compliance with previous outpatient therapy) using univariate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Overall success was 80% among low-risk outpatients and 79% among low-risk inpatients. Response to initial antibiotics was 81% among outpatients and 80% among inpatients (P = .94); 21% of those initially treated as outpatients subsequently required hospitalization. All patients ultimately responded to antibiotics; there were no deaths. Serious complications were rare (1%) and equally frequent between the groups. The mean cost of therapy among inpatients was double that of outpatients ($15,231 v $7,772; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Outpatient management of low-risk patients with FN is as safe and effective as inpatient management of low-risk patients and is significantly less costly.

Outcomes and cost of outpatient or inpatient management of 712 patients with febrile neutropenia

PURPOSE

We retrospectively compared the outcomes and costs of outpatient and inpatient management of low-risk outpatients who presented to an emergency department with febrile neutropenia (FN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single episode of FN was randomly chosen from each of 712 consecutive, low-risk solid tumor outpatients who had been treated prospectively on a clinical pathway (1997-2003). Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively for overall success (resolution of all signs and symptoms of infection without modification of antibiotics, major medical complications, or intensive care unit admission) and nine secondary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed by physician investigators who were blinded to management strategy. Outcomes and costs (payer's perspective) in 529 low-risk outpatients were compared with 123 low-risk patients who were psychosocially ineligible for outpatient management (no access to caregiver, telephone, or transportation; residence > 30 minutes from treating center; poor compliance with previous outpatient therapy) using univariate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Overall success was 80% among low-risk outpatients and 79% among low-risk inpatients. Response to initial antibiotics was 81% among outpatients and 80% among inpatients (P = .94); 21% of those initially treated as outpatients subsequently required hospitalization. All patients ultimately responded to antibiotics; there were no deaths. Serious complications were rare (1%) and equally frequent between the groups. The mean cost of therapy among inpatients was double that of outpatients ($15,231 v $7,772; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Outpatient management of low-risk patients with FN is as safe and effective as inpatient management of low-risk patients and is significantly less costly.

Diagnostic evaluation of patients with a high suspicion of malignancy: comorbidities and clinical predictors of cancer

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of cancer is based on the demonstration of malignant cells obtained via biopsy or needle aspiration. For some patients, diagnostic options may be limited either because of tumor location, underlying comorbid conditions, or lack of access to care.

METHODS

275 of 282 consecutive patients presenting to the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center with a suspicion of cancer between April 1, 2000 and January 23, 2003 were evaluated retrospectively. We analyzed differences in means of diagnosis, complication rates, clinical characteristics, and comorbid medical conditions between patients with and without a cancer diagnosis. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of a diagnosis of cancer.

RESULTS

179 (65%) patients had a cancer diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration (EUS/FNA) and image-guided percutaneous biopsy (IGPB) were the most commonly used diagnostic techniques. Complications occurred in 6% of all cases. Independent predictors of a cancer diagnosis included age of 50 years or older, jaundice, weight loss, percentage of monocytes greater than 7, and platelet count greater than 440x10/L; the ROC statistic was 0.796 (CI, 0.738-0.854; P<0.001). Controlling for age, there was no difference in comorbidity between patients with and without a cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS/FNA and IGPB play an important role in the diagnosis of certain types of malignancy and are associated with a low risk for complications. Advanced age, prior history of malignancy, weight loss, abnormally high percentage of monocytes, and thrombocytosis may be predictive of a cancer diagnosis in patients with suspected malignancy. Comorbid medical conditions are common among patients and occur at rates similar to the general population. Further study is necessary to determine organ-specific predictors of malignancy and to better understand the relationship between cancer and coexisting medical conditions.

Outcomes and cost of deep venous thrombosis among patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Although deep venous thrombosis (DVT) often complicates the clinical course in patients with cancer, few studies of the outcomes of DVT in this population have been published. Furthermore, the cost of DVT is largely undescribed. We herein report the largest study of DVT in this population to date.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 529 consecutive cancer patients in whom DVT developed from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 1997, and followed up these patients through December 31, 2000, for outcomes. The cost of hospitalization was obtained from our hospital's cost-accounting system and inflated to 2002 US dollars using the Consumer Price Index for Medical Care. Logistic regression was used to identify factors that were associated with a high risk of poor outcomes.

RESULTS

The most common complication of DVT was bleeding, which occurred in 13% of patients. Pulmonary embolus occurred in 4%. Five patients (1%) died of complications of DVT and 5 (1%) of complications of anticoagulation. Recurrence of DVT was common (17% overall), particularly among those who had inferior vena cava filters (32%; P<.001) or a previous episode of DVT (P =.03). All but 4 patients were hospitalized for initial anticoagulation therapy, for a mean of 11 days. The mean cost of hospitalization was 2002 US $20 065.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with cancer, DVT frequently is associated with serious clinical outcomes. Its treatment is resource intensive and costly. More effective agents and less costly management strategies could have a significant impact on the outcomes and cost of DVT in this population.

Cost-minimization analysis of low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) compared to unfractionated heparin for inpatient treatment of cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis

GOALS

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has shown to be as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Although the acquisition cost of LMWH is significantly greater than that of UFH, we hypothesized that once-daily dalteparin, a LMWH, could reduce treatment costs of cancer patients with DVT by eliminating anticoagulation monitoring and shortening hospitalization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We developed a cost-minimization model by using outcomes and resource utilization data from two retrospective matched cohorts of cancer patients who, between 1994 and 1999, were hospitalized at our comprehensive cancer center for treatment of DVT with either LMWH ( n=21) or UFH ( n=168). We assumed all LMWHs and UFH to be equally effective. The total costs for the dalteparin strategy and the UFH strategy were calculated in year 2003 U.S. dollars, from the provider's perspective, by multiplying the number of resources used for inpatient treatment of DVT by their unit costs.

RESULTS

The mean total cost for inpatient care was $3,383 US dollars (95% CI= $2,683- $4,083) for dalteparin and $4,952 US dollars (95% CI=$4,718-$5,185) for UFH. Substantial savings resulted from shorter hospitalization among the dalteparin-treated patients (mean 3.19 versus 5.22 days). Sensitivity analysis did not change the conclusion that dalteparin is less expensive than UFH.

CONCLUSIONS

Savings realized from less anticoagulant monitoring and shorter hospitalization offset the higher acquisition cost of dalteparin. The dalteparin strategy is less expensive than the UFH strategy for the inpatient treatment of DVT among cancer patients.

A fatigue clinic in a comprehensive cancer center: design and experiences

Cancer-related fatigue is now the most prevalent symptom of cancer, occurring in 60-90% of patients. Fatigue has been identified by cancer patients as a factor influencing functionality and quality of life. Our objectives in developing a fatigue specialty clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were to improve our patients' quality of life by decreasing fatigue; educate health care providers, patients, and patients' families about cancer-related fatigue; develop an appropriate clinical and diagnostic evaluation for this symptom; correlate objective measures of fatigue with its clinical evaluation; and develop innovative treatment plans for cancer-related fatigue. This article describes the general clinic design and operations and the preliminary analysis of the first 40 patients evaluated in the fatigue clinic.

Identifying risk factors for imminent death in cancer patients with acute dyspnea

A substantial proportion of cancer patients presenting to an emergency center (EC) or clinic with acute dyspnea survives fewer than 2 weeks. If these patients could be identified at the time of admission, physicians and patients would have additional information on which to base decisions to continue therapy to extend life or to refocus treatment efforts on palliation and/or hospice care alone. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for imminent death (survival </= 2 weeks) and short-term survival (1, 3, or 6 months) in cancer patients presenting to an EC with acute dyspnea and to combine these factors into a model to help clinicians identify patients with short life expectancies. A random sample of 122 patients presenting to an EC with acute dyspnea was selected for a retrospective analysis. Data that were available to physicians during the initial EC visit included patient histories, triage and discharge vital signs, chest radiographs, and laboratory results. These variables were used in univariate and logistic regression models to develop predictive models for imminent death and short-term survival. Variables and interactions meeting a univariate criterion of P < 0.10 were included in stepwise regression by using forward and backward stepping. Models were compared with the use of Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and receiver operating characteristics curves. Underlying cancers were 30% breast, 37% lung, and 34% other cancers. Triage respiration greater than 28/min., triage pulse greater than or equal to 110 bpm, uncontrolled progressive disease, and history of metastasis were found to be statistically significant predictors (alpha </= 0.05) of imminent death. Patients with uncontrolled progressive disease had a relative risk of imminent death of 21.93. Relative risks for triage respiration, pulse, and metastases were 12.72, 4.92, and 3.85, respectively. Cancer diagnosis was not predictive of imminent death but was predictive when longer time periods were modeled. It may be possible to identify patients whose death is imminent from a group of cancer patients with acute dyspnea. Some factors that predict imminent death (triage pulse and respiration) differ from those (cancer diagnosis) that predict short-term survival. Extent of disease/response to treatment is common to all models. These factors need further examination and validation. If these findings are confirmed, this quantified information can help physicians in making difficult end-of-life decisions.

Severity of illness, outcomes, and resource use in elderly cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis

Low-molecular-weight heparins provide new options for outpatient management of deep venous thrombosis. Because elderly patients with cancer are at increased risk of developing deep venous thrombosis, outpatient therapy for treatment of deep venous thrombosis may be important in this population. We compared the severity of illness, outcomes, and cost of deep venous thrombosis in elderly patients with cancer to those seen in younger patients with cancer. We examined all 766 episodes of deep venous thrombosis treated at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 1996. Severity of illness level and predicted risks of mortality and readmission were obtained from a commercially available disease staging system (Inforum System). Observed outcomes and cost were based on data collected from the 766 episodes of deep venous thrombosis at our institution. One hundred nineteen (16%) episodes of deep venous thrombosis occurred in patients 70 years of age or older. The severity of illness scale (1-5, least-most severe) were identical (3.7) in the 3 groups studied (< 70 years, 70-79, years and > or = 80 years). The predicted risk of death during hospitalization (6%, 9%, 8%, respectively, by group, P = 0.12) and readmission in 30 days (5%, 4%, 3%, respectively, P = 0.04) were similar among the groups. The observed death rates during hospitalization were 5%, 6%, and 6%, respectively (P = 0.91), and the rates of hospitalization for deep venous thrombosis recurrence were 22%, 16%, and 28%, respectively (P = 0.27). The similarities in outcomes and resource use between elderly and younger patients suggest that elderly patients with cancer are not at greater risk of serious clinical outcomes or a prolonged clinical course. There is significant potential for outpatient management of these patients.

Medical futility and appropriate medical care in patients whose death is thought to be imminent

Often it is very difficult to make decisions involving the termination of aggressive cancer care in the case of patients who are no longer benefiting. Among these patients, our ability to "do everything possible" to continue life is in conflict with "doing the right thing"; the greatest benefit to these patients derives from delivering excellent supportive care and assisting them in understanding and accepting end-of-life issues. Furthermore, in a cost-conscious environment with limited resources, all patients and, indeed, all of society, benefit when aggressive and often costly cancer care is limited to those patients who are likely to benefit. However, these issues are complex, blending treatment science and ethics, and thus, the physician frequently has no objective reference point on which to base the decisions. This paper integrates the principles of ethics (respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice) and three difficult issues encountered by physicians in clinical decision-making in terminal cancer patients in the American healthcare system. These issues include: medical futility and appropriate care, applications of outcomes research in clinical decision-making, and impact of cost, particularly in a managed care environment, on treatment choice. These topics are illustrated with reference to patients presenting to our emergency center with stage IV lung cancer and dyspnea, and the application of an outcomes model under development to predict imminent death in these patients is discussed. Outcomes models may provide patients, their families, and their physicians with objective data on which to base end-of-life decision-making. Minimizing aggressive treatment of terminally ill patients may provide better life quality and will reduce costs during the patients' end of life. Ethics plays a crucial role in integrating medical science, patient choice, and cost in making appropriate decisions.

Hyperphosphatemia associated with phosphorus-containing laxatives in a patient with chronic renal insufficiency

A patient with chronic renal insufficiency had hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, metabolic acidosis, and QT prolongation on electrocardiogram after taking prescribed laxatives containing phosphorus. Clinical findings included tetany in the form of Chvostek's and Trousseau's signs. Symptoms resolved after careful rehydration and electrolyte replacement. The interactions between these electrolytes are described. Patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction should avoid use of laxatives containing phosphorus. If these laxatives are used in patients with mild renal dysfunction, careful monitoring is indicated.

Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer

Until recently, febrile neutropenic patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics in inpatient settings. Because of work completed in the last several years by various investigators, identification of a low-risk group of febrile, neutropenic patients has allowed successful treatment with both parenteral and oral antibiotics in an ambulatory environment. This accomplishment has been facilitated by advances in broad-spectrum antibiotics with long half-lives and stabilities, the introduction of the quinolones providing oral antipseudomonal activity, home health care, improvements in vascular access devices, and technically enhanced antibiotic delivery systems. This review focuses on the rationale of risk stratification and the progress made in treating low-risk febrile neutropenic patients as outpatients.

Dyspnea in cancer patients. Etiology, resource utilization, and survival-implications in a managed care world

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is the fourth most common symptom of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and may, in some patients with advanced cancer, represent a clinical marker for the terminal phase of their disease. This retrospective study describes the clinical characteristics of these patients, the resource utilization associated with the management of dyspnea, and the survival of patients with this symptom.

METHODS

The authors randomly selected 122 of 1068 patients presenting with dyspnea for a retrospective analysis. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 23-90 years) and 53% were female. Underlying malignancies were breast cancer (30%), lung cancer (37%), and other cancers (34%). Approximately 94% of the patients had received prior cancer treatment and the majority (69%) had uncontrolled, progressive disease.

RESULTS

The most common treatments administered in the ED were oxygen (31%), beta-2 agonists (14%), antibiotics (12%), and narcotics (11%). Approximately 60% of patients were admitted to the hospital from the ED for further treatment of dyspnea and the underlying malignancy, and the median length of stay was 9 days. The median overall survival after the ED visit for dyspnea was 12 weeks. Specific diagnoses were associated with different median survival rates: lung cancer patients: 4 weeks; breast cancer patients: 22 weeks (P = 0.0073, vs. lung cancer); and other cancer diagnoses: 27 weeks (P = 0.0027, vs. lung cancer).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea have much shorter survival than patients with other malignancies. For some patients, the presence of dyspnea requiring emergency treatment may indicate a phase in their illness in which resources should be shifted from acute intervention with hospitalization to palliative and supportive care measures.

Dyspnea in cancer patients. Etiology, resource utilization, and survival-implications in a managed care world

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is the fourth most common symptom of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and may, in some patients with advanced cancer, represent a clinical marker for the terminal phase of their disease. This retrospective study describes the clinical characteristics of these patients, the resource utilization associated with the management of dyspnea, and the survival of patients with this symptom.

METHODS

The authors randomly selected 122 of 1068 patients presenting with dyspnea for a retrospective analysis. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 23-90 years) and 53% were female. Underlying malignancies were breast cancer (30%), lung cancer (37%), and other cancers (34%). Approximately 94% of the patients had received prior cancer treatment and the majority (69%) had uncontrolled, progressive disease.

RESULTS

The most common treatments administered in the ED were oxygen (31%), beta-2 agonists (14%), antibiotics (12%), and narcotics (11%). Approximately 60% of patients were admitted to the hospital from the ED for further treatment of dyspnea and the underlying malignancy, and the median length of stay was 9 days. The median overall survival after the ED visit for dyspnea was 12 weeks. Specific diagnoses were associated with different median survival rates: lung cancer patients: 4 weeks; breast cancer patients: 22 weeks (P = 0.0073, vs. lung cancer); and other cancer diagnoses: 27 weeks (P = 0.0027, vs. lung cancer).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea have much shorter survival than patients with other malignancies. For some patients, the presence of dyspnea requiring emergency treatment may indicate a phase in their illness in which resources should be shifted from acute intervention with hospitalization to palliative and supportive care measures.

Outpatient antibiotic treatment in low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients

Traditionally febrile neutropenic patients have been treated with parenteral antibiotics in an inpatient setting; however, recent work by several investigators has demonstrated successful treatment with both parenteral and oral antibiotics in an ambulatory environment. This has been accomplished by identification of low-risk neutropenic patients, advances in broad-spectrum antibiotics with long half-lives and stabilities, the introduction of the oral quinolones, home health-care initiatives, improvements in vascular access devices, and development of technically enhanced antibiotic delivery systems. Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients should now be considered an acceptable alternative to hospital-based treatment. This review focuses on the development and rationale of risk stratification and examines the results of various outpatient antibiotic trials recently completed.

Causes and management of superior vena cava syndrome

Superior vena cava syndrome is today primarily a disease associated with malignancy. Thrombosis of the superior vena cava associated with the use of intravascular devices or extraluminal obstruction from malignancy is now recognized as an important pathophysiologic process in the syndrome. Irradiation has long been the mainstay of treatment. Newer treatments include more effective chemotherapy for certain cancers such as lymphoma and small-cell carcinoma, fibrinolytics to treat thrombosis, and interventional radiologic techniques. Expandable metallic stents have been shown to improve the quality of life for patients who, in the past, quickly succumbed to the disease process. Current management stresses the importance of accurate diagnosis of the underlying etiology before treatment. Only under extreme emergent conditions such as laryngeal or cerebral edema should irradiation proceed without a diagnosis. Future studies should address the role of anticoagulant therapy and the timing of interventional techniques in relation to radiation or chemotherapy.