The Procalcitonin And Survival Study (PASS) - a randomised multi-center investigator-initiated trial to investigate whether daily measurements biomarker Procalcitonin and pro-active diagnostic and therapeutic responses to abnormal Procalcitonin levels, can improve survival in intensive care unit patients. Calculated sample size (target population): 1000 patients

BACKGROUND

Sepsis and complications to sepsis are major causes of mortality in critically ill patients. Rapid treatment of sepsis is of crucial importance for survival of patients. The infectious status of the critically ill patient is often difficult to assess because symptoms cannot be expressed and signs may present atypically. The established biological markers of inflammation (leucocytes, C-reactive protein) may often be influenced by other parameters than infection, and may be unacceptably slowly released after progression of an infection. At the same time, lack of a relevant antimicrobial therapy in an early course of infection may be fatal for the patient. Specific and rapid markers of bacterial infection have been sought for use in these patients.

METHODS

Multi-centre randomized controlled interventional trial. Powered for superiority and non-inferiority on all measured end points. Complies with, "Good Clinical Practice" (ICH-GCP Guideline (CPMP/ICH/135/95, Directive 2001/20/EC)). Inclusion: 1) Age > or = 18 years of age, 2) Admitted to the participating intensive care units, 3) Signed written informed consent.Exclusion: 1) Known hyper-bilirubinaemia. or hypertriglyceridaemia, 2) Likely that safety is compromised by blood sampling, 3) Pregnant or breast feeding. Computerized Randomisation: Two arms (1:1), n = 500 per arm: Arm 1: standard of care. Arm 2: standard of care and Procalcitonin guided diagnostics and treatment of infection. Primary Trial Objective: To address whether daily Procalcitonin measurements and immediate diagnostic and therapeutic response on day-to-day changes in procalcitonin can reduce the mortality of critically ill patients.

DISCUSSION

For the first time ever, a mortality-endpoint, large scale randomized controlled trial with a biomarker-guided strategy compared to the best standard of care, is conducted in an Intensive care setting. Results will, with a high statistical power answer the question: Can the survival of critically ill patients be improved by actively using biomarker procalcitonin in the treatment of infections? 700 critically ill patients are currently included of 1000 planned (June 2008). Two interim analyses have been passed without any safety or futility issues, and the third interim analysis is soon to take place. Trial registration number at clinicaltrials.gov: Id. nr.: NCT00271752).

[Arterial puncture or pulse oximetry?]

Arterial puncture is the general accepted standard method for monitoring oxygen therapy in critically ill patients, but this technique is painful for the patient, has the potential of complications, and does not provide immediate continuous data. Pulse oximetry is a non-invasive method used to measure arterial oxygen saturation with a clinically acceptable accuracy of +/- 2%. Despite some limitations, pulse oximetry is considered to be reliable in most cases in detecting hypoxaemia and monitoring oxygen therapy in stationary units. The pulse oximeter can reduce the number of arterial punctures, personnel's time consumption, and limit oxygen abuse. Furthermore the new transportable and hand-held pulse oximeters offer new possibilities for continuous 24 hour monitoring of oxygen saturation also out of hospitals. The pulse oximeter can optimize monitoring patients' oxygen saturation in the stationary units, however, arterial puncture will remain the most reliable method in the assessment of hypoxaemia and hypercapnia, especially in acute situations.

[Malignant bone pain]

Bone pain is one of the most frequent causes of pain in patients with cancer, and the levels of metastases and bone pain are not directly correlated. Nociceptors in the periosteum are probably stimulated by halisteresis or by inflammatory oedema leading to an increase in the intraosseous pressure. Some authors believe that the nociceptors in bone are mediated via intraosseous mechanoreceptors in the bone-matrix. At a low pain level the initial treatment is acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol or other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. At increasing pain level initial doses of oral opioids are added. In severe bone pain, where conventional therapy seems difficult, opioids are administered by invasive techniques. In localised bone pain palliative radiation is the first treatment of choice. Corticosteroids induce an analgetic effect indirectly by reducing the inflammatory oedema, inhibiting the synthesis of prostaglandins and may inhibit excitatory nerve fibres. Endocrine treatment, calcitonin and biophosphonates have shown a documented pain-relieving effect in patients with disseminated breast and prostate cancer. Chemotherapy has shown a pain-relieving effect in patients with disseminated breast cancer, surgical intervention is used in stabilizing osteolytic bones before or after a fracture ensuring a reasonable relief of pain.

[Paraquat poisoning. Treatment and prognosis]

Treatment of paraquat intoxication is most often in vain if initial treatment is delayed. We report a case where the patient was admitted 25 hours after oral intake of paraquat. The patient died due to respiratory insufficiency secondary to peroxidative pulmonary fibrosis in spite of combined continuous haemodialysis and haemofiltration. Principles of treatment are reviewed.

Subcutaneously versus subfascially administered lidocaine in pain treatment after inguinal herniotomy

We conducted a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of subfascial (SF) versus subcutaneous (SC) lidocaine (10 mL 1%) given in the wound postoperatively through a catheter placed in the respective layer intraoperatively. The initial pain scores were similar in the two groups before injection of lidocaine. In the SC group, there was a reduction in pain scores during rest from 4 to 3 (P > 0.05), during cough from 6 to 5 (P > 0.05), and during mobilization from 7 to 5.5 (P > 0.05) at 15 min. In the SF group, the reductions in pain scores were from 4 to 2 (P < 0.05), from 6 to 3 (P < 0.05), and from 7 to 3 (P < 0.05), respectively. Supplemental analgesics after the lidocaine administration were needed earlier in the SC group than in the SF group (P < 0.01). We conclude that postoperative pain treatment with local lidocaine application after herniotomy has a better effect when applied in the SF, rather than the SC, layer.