Abstract P121: Update on Regional Stroke Activation Trends During Covid-19 Mitigation

Background: The University of Cincinnati Stroke Team provides acute stroke care to the southwest Ohio, northern Kentucky, and southeast Indiana catchment area of ~2 million people and 30 healthcare facilities. We previously published a significant decline in stroke activations and reperfusion treatment (IV thrombolysis and EVT) rates following state announcements of COVID-19 mitigation measures. Here, we update these trends after state reopening guidelines.

Methods: We compared Stroke Team activations and reperfusion treatments logged in a prospectively collected database, comparing the same period in 2020 versus 2019. Kentucky and Ohio announced school and restaurant closures on March 12 and 13, respectively, followed by Indiana. A stepwise reopening of our tristate area started on May 1, 2020. We also compared trends in activations and treatment rates before (Weeks 1-10), during (Weeks 11-17), and after (Weeks 18-26) the lifting of COVID-19 mitigation efforts using the Poisson test, and graphically with segmented regression analysis.

Results: Compared to 2019, stroke team activations declined by 12% in 2020 (95% CI 7 - 16%; p<0.01). During 2020, an initial decline in stroke activations following COVID-19 mitigation announcements was followed by a 28% increase in activations after reopening (Weeks 18-26: 95% CI 15 - 42%; p<0.01). In contrast, compared to 2019, treatment rates were unchanged (0%, 95% CI -15 - 18%; p=1.00), including specifically IV thrombolysis and thrombectomy rates. Similarly, an initial decline in reperfusion treatments was followed by a 24% nonsignificant increase after reopening (95% CI -10 - 71%; p=0.19) in 2020.

Conclusion: The initial decline in stroke team activations during COVID-19 mitigation efforts was followed by an increase in activations after reopening. Hospital capacity and 911 services remained fully intact, suggesting that the reduction in activations were related to reduced presentation by patients for emergent stroke care.

Can non-contrast head CT and stroke severity be used for stroke triage? A population-based study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients may benefit from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) up to 24 h since last known normal (LKN). Advanced imaging is required for patient selection. Small or rural hospitals may not have sufficient CT technician and radiology support to rapidly acquire and interpret images. We estimated transfer rates using non-contrast head CT and stroke severity to select patients to be transferred to larger centers for evaluation.

METHODS

We identified all AIS among residents of the study region in 2010. Only cases age ≥ 18 with baseline mRS 0-2 that presented to an ED were included. Among cases that presented between 6 and 24 h from LKN, those without evidence of acute infarct on head CT and with initial NIHSS ≥6 or ≥ 10 were identified.

RESULTS

Of 1359 AIS cases, 448 (33.0%) presented between 6 and 24 h, of which 383 (85.5%) showed no evidence of acute infarct on CT. Of cases with no acute infarct on CT, 89/383 (23.2%) had NIHSS ≥6, of which 66 (74.2%) initially presented to a hospital without thrombectomy capabilities; and 51/383 (13.3%) had NIHSS ≥10, of which 40 (78.4%) presented to a non-thrombectomy hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, 40-66 AIS patients annually (0.8-1.3/week, or 3-5 patients/100,000 persons/year) may present to non-thrombectomy hospitals and need to be transferred using non-contrast CT and stroke severity as screening tools. Such an approach may sufficiently mitigate the impact of delays in treatment on outcomes, without overburdening the referring nor accepting hospitals.

Effect of COVID-19 on Emergent Stroke Care: A Regional Experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Anecdotal evidence suggests that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic mitigation efforts may inadvertently discourage patients from seeking treatment for stroke with resultant increased morbidity and mortality. Analysis of regional data, while hospital capacities for acute stroke care remained fully available, offers an opportunity to assess this. We report regional Stroke Team acute activations and reperfusion treatments during COVID-19 mitigation activities.

METHODS

Using case log data prospectively collected by a Stroke Team exclusively serving ≈2 million inhabitants and 30 healthcare facilities, we retrospectively reviewed volumes of consultations and reperfusion treatments for acute ischemic stroke. We compared volumes before and after announcements of COVID-19 mitigation measures and the prior calendar year.

RESULTS

Compared with the 10 weeks prior, stroke consultations declined by 39% (95% CI, 32%-46%) in the 5 weeks after announcement of statewide school and restaurant closures in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. Results compared with the prior year and time trend analyses were consistent. Reperfusion treatments also appeared to decline by 31% (95% CI, 3%-51%), and specifically thrombolysis by 33% (95% CI, 4%-55%), but this finding had less precision.

CONCLUSIONS

Upon the announcement of measures to mitigate COVID-19, regional acute stroke consultations declined significantly. Reperfusion treatment rates, particularly thrombolysis, also appeared to decline qualitatively, and this finding requires further study. Urgent public education is necessary to mitigate a possible crisis of avoiding essential emergency care due to COVID-19.

The Trouble with Swallowing: Dysphagia as the Presenting Symptom in Lateral Medullary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Posterior circulation strokes account for approximately one-fourth of all ischemic strokes, but are frequently misdiagnosed by emergency providers. Current standard stroke screening tools such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale are weighted toward anterior circulation stroke diagnosis. Lateral medullary syndrome, a type of posterior circulation stroke, can be particularly challenging to diagnose due to nonspecific presenting symptoms, such as dysphagia.

CASE REPORT

This report describes a 65-year-old man who presented with dysphagia, dizziness, and hoarseness. An initial neurological examination did not reveal any gross deficits, and imaging to evaluate for posterior circulation stroke was not obtained. The patient presented the following day with worsening symptoms, prompting imaging that revealed a large cerebellar ischemic infarction. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Although dysphagia frequently occurs in lateral medullary syndrome, it is rarely the presenting symptom in the emergency department. In patients with cerebrovascular risk factors who present with dysphagia, a complete neurological examination should be performed and noncontrast computed tomography (CT) of the head should be obtained if a neurological deficit is appreciated. Due to their poor sensitivity, CT scans can frequently miss posterior circulation strokes, therefore magnetic resonance imaging should be considered if provider suspicion remains high. Emergency providers are encouraged to have a high level of suspicion for this rare but debilitating stroke syndrome to avoid misdiagnosis and delayed care.