Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

The effects of temporary mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump on mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock remains unclear.

METHODS

In an international, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock to receive a microaxial flow pump (Impella CP) plus standard care or standard care alone. The primary end point was death from any cause at 180 days. A composite safety end point was severe bleeding, limb ischemia, hemolysis, device failure, or worsening aortic regurgitation.

RESULTS

A total of 360 patients underwent randomization, of whom 355 were included in the final analysis (179 in the microaxial-flow-pump group and 176 in the standard-care group). The median age of the patients was 67 years, and 79.2% were men. Death from any cause occurred in 82 of 179 patients (45.8%) in the microaxial-flow-pump group and in 103 of 176 patients (58.5%) in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.99; P = 0.04). A composite safety end-point event occurred in 43 patients (24.0%) in the microaxial-flow-pump group and in 11 (6.2%) in the standard-care group (relative risk, 4.74; 95% CI, 2.36 to 9.55). Renal-replacement therapy was administered to 75 patients (41.9%) in the microaxial-flow-pump group and to 47 patients (26.7%) in the standard-care group (relative risk, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of a microaxial flow pump with standard care in the treatment of patients with STEMI-related cardiogenic shock led to a lower risk of death from any cause at 180 days than standard care alone. The incidence of a composite of adverse events was higher with the use of the microaxial flow pump. (Funded by the Danish Heart Foundation and Abiomed; DanGer Shock ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01633502.).

Temporal Trends in Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Nationwide Study

With increased use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in treatment of aortic stenosis, it is important to evaluate real life data trends in outcomes. This nationwide register-based study aimed to present an outlook on temporal trends in characteristics and outcomes, including mortality. First-time consecutive Danish patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 to 2019 were included in this study. The chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to assess the differences in the characteristics over time and Cochrane-Armitage trend tests were used to examine changes in complications and mortality. Between 2010 and 2019, 4,847 patients (54.6% men, median age 82 [quartile 1 to quartile 3: 77 to 85] years) underwent first-time TAVI. A statistically significant decrease over time was observed for preprocedural hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure, whereas preexisting chronic obstructive lung disease and preprocedural pacemaker remained stable. We observed a significant decrease in 30- and 90-day postoperative preprocedural pacemaker implantation from 2011 to 2017, with 15.1% and 15.9% in 2011 and 8.6% and 8.9% in 2017, respectively. The incidence of for 30- and 90-day heart failure significantly decreased from 19.3% and 20.3% to 8.5% and 9.1%, respectively. We observed significant changes for 30-day atrial fibrillation, whereas the changes over time for 90-day atrial fibrillation and 30- and 90-day stroke/transient ischemic attack remained insignificant. The all-cause mortality within 30- and 90 days significantly decreased over time from 6.7% and 9.2% in 2011 to 1.5% and 2.7% in 2019 and 2016, respectively. In conclusion, this national study provides general insight on the trends of complications and mortality of TAVI, demonstrating significant reductions over time.

Dual-therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting COMBO stents versus sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stents in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: the three-year outcomes of the SORT OUT X randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Target lesion failure (TLF) remains an issue with contemporary drug-eluting stents. The dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34 antibody-coated COMBO stent (DTS) was designed to improve early healing.

AIMS

We aimed to compare the 3-year outcomes of the DTS and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (SES) in all-comer patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

The SORT OUT X trial is a prospective multicentre randomised clinical trial with a registry-based follow-up comparing DTS and SES. The primary endpoint, TLF, is a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation (TLR).

RESULTS

A total of 3,146 patients were randomised to treatment with the DTS (1,578 patients) or the SES (1,568 patients). At 3 years, an intention-to-treat analysis showed that 155 patients (9.8%) who were assigned the DTS and 118 patients (7.5%) who were assigned the SES met the primary endpoint (incidence rate ratio for TLF=1.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.70; p=0.02). This difference was caused by a significantly higher TLF rate in the DTS group compared to the SES group within the first year, which was mainly explained by a higher incidence of TLR in the DTS group compared to the SES group. Of note, the TLF rates were almost identical from 1 year to 3 years in both stent groups.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 years, the SES was superior to the DTS, mainly because the DTS was associated with an increased risk of TLF within the first year but not from 1 to 3 years.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT03216733.

Data standards for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart)

AIMS

Standardized data definitions are necessary for the quantification of quality of care and patient outcomes in observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) project of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aims to create pan-European data standards for cardiovascular diseases and interventions, including transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We followed the EuroHeart methodology for cardiovascular data standard development. A Working Group of 29 members representing 12 countries was established and included a patient representative, as well as experts in the management of valvular heart disease from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and used a modified Delphi method to reach consensus on a final set of variables. For each variable, the Working Group provided a definition, permissible values, and categorized the variable as mandatory (Level 1) or additional (Level 2) based on its clinical importance and feasibility. In total, 93 Level 1 and 113 Level 2 variables were selected, with the level 1 variables providing the dataset for registration of patients undergoing TAVI on the EuroHeart IT platform.

CONCLUSION

This document provides details of the EuroHeart data standards for TAVI processes of care and in-hospital outcomes. In the context of EuroHeart, this will facilitate quality improvement, observational research, registry-based RCTs and post-marketing surveillance of devices, and pharmacotherapies.

ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY

The EuroHeart data standards for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are a set of internationally agreed data variables and definitions that once implemented will facilitate improvement of quality of care and outcomes for patients receiving TAVI.

Quantitative aortography for assessment of aortic regurgitation in the era of percutaneous aortic valve replacement

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a shortcoming that can erode the clinical benefits of transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR) and therefore a readily applicable method (aortography) to quantitate PVL objectively and accurately in the interventional suite is appealing to all operators. The ratio between the areas of the time-density curves in the aorta and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT-AR) defines the regurgitation fraction (RF). This technique has been validated in a mock circulation; a single injection in diastole was further tested in porcine and ovine models. In the clinical setting, LVOT-AR was compared with trans-thoracic and trans-oesophageal echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. LVOT-AR > 17% discriminates mild from moderate aortic regurgitation on echocardiography and confers a poor prognosis in multiple registries, and justifies balloon post-dilatation. The LVOT-AR differentiates the individual performances of many old and novel devices and is being used in ongoing randomized trials and registries.

Early healing after treatment of coronary lesions by thin strut everolimus, or thicker strut biolimus eluting bioabsorbable polymer stents: The SORT-OUT VIII OCT study

AIMS

Early healing after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation may reduce the risk of stent thrombosis. The aim of this study was to compare patterns of early healing after implantation of the thin strut everolimus-eluting Synergy DES (Boston Scientific) or the biolimus-eluting Biomatix Neoflex DES (Biosensors).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 160 patients with the chronic or acute coronary syndrome were randomized 1:1 to Synergy or Biomatrix DES. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed at baseline and at either 1- or 3-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was a coronary stent healing index (CSHI), a weighted index of strut coverage, neointimal hyperplasia, malapposition, and extrastent lumen. A total of 133 cases had OCT follow-up and 119 qualified for matched OCT analysis. The median CSHI score did neither differ significantly between the groups at 1 month: Synergy 8.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.0; 14.0) versus Biomatrix 8.5 (IQR: 4.0; 15.0) (p = 0.47) nor at 3 months: Synergy 6.5 (IQR: 2.0; 13.0) versus Biomatrix 6.0 (IQR: 4.0; 11.0) (p = 0.83). Strut coverage was 84.6% (IQR: 72.0; 97.9) for Synergy versus 77.6% (IQR: 70.1; 90.3) for Biomatrix (p = 0.15) at 1 month and 90.3% (IQR 79.0; 98.8) (Synergy) versus 83.9% (IQR: 77.5; 92.6) (Biomatrix) (p = 0.068) at 3 months. Pooled 1- and 3-month coverage was 88.6% (IQR: 74.4; 98.4) for Synergy compared with 80.7% (IQR: 73.2; 90.8) for Biomatrix (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The early healing response after treatment with the Synergy or Biomatrix DES did not differ significantly as determined by a healing index. The Synergy DES showed overall better early stent strut coverage.

Impact of acute coronary syndrome on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual-therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of the dual-therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent (DTS) and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (O-SES) in patients with and without acute coronary syndrome (ACS) included in the SORT OUT X study.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) after treatment with modern drug-eluting stents has been reported to be significantly higher in patients with ACS when compared to patients without ACS. Whether the results from the SORT OUT X study apply to patients with and without ACS remains unknown.

METHODS

In total, 3146 patients were randomized to stent implantation with DTS (n = 1578; ACS: n = 856) or O-SES (n = 1568; ACS: n = 854). The primary end point, TLF, was a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the rate of TLF was higher in the DTS group compared to the O-SES group, both among patients with ACS (6.7% vs. 4.1%; incidence rate ratio: 1.65 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.08-2.52]) and without ACS (6.0% vs. 3.2%; incidence rate ratio: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.13-3.14]). The differences were mainly explained by higher rates of TLR, whereas rates of cardiac death and target lesion MI did not differ significantly between the two stent groups in patients with or without ACS CONCLUSION: Compared to the O-SES, the DTS was associated with a higher risk of TLF at 12 months in patients with and without ACS. The differences were mainly explained by higher rates of TLR.

Case report: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a large bicuspid anatomy using the XL-Myval 32 mm

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a recommended intervention for selected population with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) anatomy has been categorized as an unfavorable anatomy for TAVR due to multiple considerations as exclusion from randomized trials in addition to the challenging and unpredictable anatomy. The anatomical constraints of BAV include the large anatomy of the annulus, sinus of Valsalva, and aorta (aortopathy), in addition to significant calcifications of the device landing zone. Most commercial transcatheter heart valves (THV) have upper dimension limits of the annulus and area in which the device can be implanted safely without significant oversizing. Myval-XL THVs (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., India) are balloon-expandable valves (BEV) that have been developed with two new sizes, 30.5 and 32 mm, aiming to treat patients with large annulus dimensions and that exceed the upper limit of an ordinary device's sizing matrix. This case series report describes TAVR using the XL-Myval 32 mm THV in three European patients with symptomatic severe bicuspid aortic stenosis with significant calcifications and large annular dimensions exceeding the limits of the other THVs.

Angiographic outcome in patients treated with deferred stenting after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-results from DANAMI-3-DEFER

AIMS

Stent implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) occasionally results in flow disturbances and distal embolization, which may cause adverse clinical outcomes. Deferred stent implantation seems to reduce the impairment on myocardial function, although the mechanisms have not been clarified. We sought to evaluate whether deferred stenting could reduce flow disturbance in patients treated with primary PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with STEMI included in the DANAMI-3-DEFER trial were randomized to deferred versus immediate stent implantation. The primary and secondary outcomes of this substudy were the incidences of slow/no reflow and distal embolization. A total of 1205 patients were included. Deferred stenting (n = 594) resulted in lower incidences of distal embolization [odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.98, P = 0.040] and slow/no reflow (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.37-0.97, P = 0.039). In high-risk subgroups, the protective effect was greatest in patients >65 years of age (slow/no reflow: OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.72, P = 0.004 and distal embolization: OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.63, P = 0.001), in patients presenting with occluded culprit artery at admission (slow/no reflow: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.65, P = 0.001 and distal embolization: OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.96, P = 0.036) and in patients with thrombus grade >3 (slow/no reflow: OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.67, P = 0.001 and distal embolization: OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.64, P < 0.001) with a significant P for interaction for all.

CONCLUSION

Deferred stent implantation reduces the incidences of slow/no reflow and distal embolization, especially in older patients and in those with total coronary occlusion or high level of thrombus burden.

Long-term neurological intact survival and quality of life after refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with rescue mechanical circulatory support

Background

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with either veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) or Impella has emerged as a rescue therapy for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, only short-term outcome is specified and most studies do not report follow-up beyond six months. Long-term survival and quality of life in this high-risk population remains unknown.

Purpose

To determine long-term neurological intact survival and quality of life in patients with refractory OHCA treated with MCS.

Methods

This was an observational, single-centre study of OHCA-patients from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients treated with MCS for OHCA were compared with patients receiving conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A follow-up of long-term survivors in the MCS group was conducted (&gt;1 year after arrest). This included health related quality of life questionaries (Short Form-36 [SF-36]) and assessment of neurological function with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC). Good neurological outcome was defined as CPC 1 and CPC 2.

Results

A total of 1015 with OHCA were included; 101 received MCS for refractory cardiac arrest. Among these V-A ECMO was deployed in 97 patients and Impella in 4 patients. The MCS group had significantly longer low-flow times compared to the conventional group (105 [IQR, 94–123] minutes versus 18 [IQR 10–39] minutes) and were more metabolically deranged upon arrival at hospital (Table 1). In patients receiving MCS, the hospital discharge rate was 27% and good neurological outcome was seen in 93% among patients discharged. At follow-up, 15 out of 21 long-term survivors participated. Median follow-up time was 4.8±1.6 (range 2.8–6.1 years). Mean age at follow-up was 61±7.3 years, 11 (73%) were men. Neurological outcome with CPC 1 was found in 12 patients (80%), with CPC 2 in 2 patients (13%), and with CPC 3 in 1 patient (7%). Two had improved neurological status from CPC 2 to CPC 1 since discharge. Mean scores of the SF-36 revealed an overall high level of psychical and mental health in long-term survivors (Figure 1).

Conclusion

Long-term survival with good neurological outcome was high in patients with refractory OHCA treated with MCS despite prolonged resuscitation and severe metabolic derangement. These patients may expect a reasonable quality of life after discharge.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University HospitalSnedkermester Sophus Jacobsen og hustru Astrid Jacobsens Fond

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a national study on the association between survival and biomarkers of hypoperfusion, inflammation, and organ failure

Background

In refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with prolonged whole-body ischemia, global tissue injury proceeds even after establishment of circulation with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

Purpose

We aimed to investigate the role of biomarkers reflecting hypoperfusion, inflammation, and organ injury in prognostication of patients with refractory OHCA managed with ECPR.

Methods

This nationwide retrospective study included 226 adults with refractory OHCA managed with ECPR in Denmark (2011–2020). Biomarkers at admission and consecutively two days after ECPR initiation were retrieved. Odds ratio (OR) of 90-day survival were assessed by logistic regression analyses. Cut-off values were calculated from area under the curve (AUC) via the Youden index.

Results

Fifty-six patients (25%) survived to hospital discharge, all were still alive after 90-days and 91% had a favorable neurological status at discharge. Factors independently associated with 90-day survival were: male sex, shockable presenting rhythm, low flow time, platelets, pH, lactate, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) level. Comparing the ability of standard predictive variables (age, sex, shockable presenting rhythm, witnessed arrest, and low flow time) and selected biomarkers (from multivariate analyses) in predicting 90-day survival, biomarkers day 2 after OHCA were significantly better than standard variables (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.56, p=0.01).

Conclusion

Biomarkers of hypoperfusion (low lactate and high pH), inflammation (high platelets and CRP), and organ failure (low LDH, ALP, and CK-MB) were independently associated with 90-day survival. Biomarkers on day 2 after OHCA (d-dimer, ALP, and CK-MB) were more predictive of 90-day survival than standard predictive variables.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Odense University Hospital's and Rigshospitalet's Common Research Foundation

Selection of patients for mechanical circulatory support for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Danish nationwide multicenter study

Background

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a potential salvage therapy for selected patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Purpose

The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of potential ECPR patients.

Methods

This retrospective, observational cohort study included 579 patients admitted with refractory OHCA for possible ECPR at all tertiary cardiac arrest centers in Denmark between 2015 and 2020. Presenting characteristics, reasons for refraining from ECPR, and survival to hospital discharge were recorded.

Results

After initial evaluation, 221 patients (38%) proceeded to ECPR, and 358 (62%) were considered futile. Median prehospital low-flow time was 70 minutes [interquartile range 56–85] in ECPR patients and 62 minutes [48–81] in no-ECPR patients, p&lt;0.001. Intra arrest transport was more than 50 km in 92 (42%) ECPR patients and 135 in no-ECPR patients (38%), p=0.25. Treatment decision was taken by a team of three specialists in 513 cases (97%). The leading cause for not initiating ECPR was duration of low flow time (39%). Severe metabolic derangement and low end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) were contributing factors in 35% and 31%, respectively, Figure 1. 83% of the patients had two or more contributing factors recorded as reasons for not initiating ECPR, Figure 2. The most prevailing combination of contributing factors were non-shockable rhythm, low ETCO2, and metabolic derangement or duration of prehospital low flow time combined with low ETCO2. Survival to discharge was achieved in six patients (1.7%) in the no-ECPR group and 50 (23%) in the ECPR group.

Conclusions

In this large nationwide study of patients admitted for possible ECPR, 62% were not treated with ECPR. The most frequent reasons to abstain from ECPR were duration of prehospital low flow time, metabolic derangement, and low ETCO2.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Danish Heart Foundation

Direct comparison of very early AMI rule-out algorithms

Introduction

Early rule-out of AMI may have a considerable impact on healthcare spending.

Numerous algorithms for early rule-out of AMI has been suggested within the last year. However, most algorithms are limited by the need for consecutive, timely separated in-hospital blood samples, prolonging length of hospital stay. Very early rule-out algorithms, providing necessary biomarker results shortly after arrival to hospital or even before, could reduce the burden on EDs and cardiology departments.

Many algorithms have been evaluated, validated and compared in several studies; however, often in different subpopulations of larger studies. Reported differences in diagnostic performance of these algorithms may very likely have been caused by differences between the tested patient subgroups. Therefore, a direct comparison of very early rule-out algorithms in a single cohort with all necessary information available for all algorithms is needed.

Purpose

In this study we aimed to compare the ESC 0h/1h algorithm with ten rule-out algorithms, including the ESC 0h/3h algorithm, an in-hospital Dual-Marker strategy (DMS) (combining hs-cTnT with copeptin), and seven very early algorithms (potential rule-out at admission) for rule-out of AMI. Four algorithms are strictly prehospital and three combines prehospital and in-hospital blood samples, see table 1 for description of evaluated algorithms.

Methods

The diagnostic performance of the rule-out algorithms was compared in patients with suspected AMI from a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. We only included patients who had all required information for each diagnostic algorithm available.

AMI was adjudicated by at least two cardiologists.

Results

We included 1.601 patients, see table 2. Of these 136 (8.5%) had type 1 AMI.

We found that 7 of 11 algorithms, including the present ECS-recommended 0h/1h algorithm, performed with acceptable sensitivities above 98% and specificities between 13.5 and 52.0%.

The ESC 0h/3h algorithm had a unacceptably low sensitivity of 87.5%.

Four of the very early rule-out algorithms (the HEART score, the Modified prehospital HEART score, the Modified prehospital DMS, and the Modified prehospital/in-hospital DMS) all performed with excellent sensitivity of 100% and thereby missing no AMIs. Of these, the HEART score derivates ruled out 13.5–16.2% of pts. without AMI, while the two DMS derivates ruled out 14.3–27.4% of pts without AMI.

Compared with the ESC 0h/1h algorithm the very early rule out algorithms provide the necessary biomarker results at least 1 hour earlier, and when well-performing POCT analyses becomes available for copeptin and troponin analysis, even before arrival to hospital.

Conclusions

Four very early rule out algorithms performed excellent in the rule out of AMI, with 100% sensitivities and specificities of up to 27.4%. This enables safe rule out of AMI shortly after arrival to hospital, and in future, potentially already in the ambulance.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National budget only - Danish Heart Foundation and Independent Research Fund Denmark

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of the dual therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent (DTS) and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (SES) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) included in the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome (SORT OUT) X study.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) after treatment with modern drug-eluting stents has been reported to be significantly higher in patients with DM when compared to patients without DM. Thus, whether the results from the SORT OUT X study apply to patients with and without DM remains unknown.

METHODS

In total 3146 patients were randomized to stent implantation with DTS (n = 1578; DM: n = 279) or SES (n = 1568; DM: n = 271). The primary end point, TLF, was a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the rate of TLF was increased in the DTS group compared to the SES group, both among patients with DM (9.3% vs. 4.8%; risk difference: 4.5%; incidence rate ratio: 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.90) and without DM (5.7% vs. 3.5%; incidence rate ratio: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.15-2.42). The differences were mainly explained by higher rates of TLR.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the SES, the DTS was associated with an increased risk of TLF at 12 months in patients with and without DM. The differences were mainly explained by higher rates of TLR, whereas rates of cardiac death and target lesion MI did not differ significantly between the two stent groups in patients with or without DM.

Safety and Efficacy of Myval Implantation in Patients with Severe Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis-A Multicenter Real-World Experience

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common valvular congenital anomaly and is apparent in nearly 50% of candidates for AV replacement. While transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a recommended treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) at all surgical risk levels, experience with TAVI in severe bicuspid AS is limited. TAVI in BAV is still a challenge due to its association with multiple and complex anatomical considerations. A retrospective study has been conducted to investigate TAVI's procedural and 30-day outcomes using the Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. Vapi, Gujarat, India) in patients with severe bicuspid AS. Data were collected on 68 patients with severe bicuspid AS who underwent TAVI with the Myval THV. Baseline characteristics, procedural, 30-day echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were collected. The mean age and STS PROM score were 72.6 ± 9.4 and 3.54 ± 2.1. Procedures were performed via the transfemoral route in 98.5%. Major vascular complications (1.5%) and life-threatening bleeding (1.5%) occurred infrequently. No patient had coronary obstruction, second valve implantation or conversion to surgery. On 30-day echocardiography, the mean transvalvular gradient and effective orifice area were 9.8 ± 4.5 mmHg and 1.8 ± 0.4 cm², respectively. None/trace aortic regurgitation occurred in 76.5%, mild AR in 20.5% and moderate AR in 3%. The permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 8.5% and 30-day all-cause death occurred in 3.0% of cases. TAVI with the Myval THV in selected BAV anatomy is associated with favorable short-term hemodynamic and clinical outcomes.

Mechanical circulatory support for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide multicentre study

Background

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has shown potential as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Despite growing interest in and a growing body of literature on ECPR for refractory OHCA, robust evidence on patient eligibility is still lacking.

Purpose

To describe the survival, neurological outcome, and adherence to the national consensus with respect to use of ECPR for OHCA, and to identify factors associated with outcome.

Methods

Retrospective, observational cohort study of patients who underwent ECPR for OHCA at four cardiac arrest centres. Binary logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were performed to assess association with 30-day mortality.

Results

A total of 259 patients receiving ECPR for OHCA between July 2011 and December 2020 were included in the study. Thirty-day survival was 26% and a good neurological outcome Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1–2 was observed in 94% of patients at discharge. Strict adherence to the national consensus showed a 30-day survival rate of 30%. Adding one or more of the following criteria to the national consensus: signs of life during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), pre-hospital low-flow &lt;100 minutes, pH &gt;6.8 and lactate &lt;15 mmol/L increased the survival rate to 48%, but would exclude 58% of the survivors from the current cohort. Logistic regression identified initial presenting rhythm with asystole (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18–1.57), pulseless electrical activity (PEA) (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03–1.41), initial pH &lt;6.8 (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12–1.46) and lactate levels &gt;15 mmol/L (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.16–1.53) as factors associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients presenting signs of life during CPR had threefold higher survival rate than patients without signs of life (45% versus 13%, p&lt;0.001)

Conclusion

A high survival rate with a good neurological outcome was observed in this population of patients treated with ECPR for OHCA. Signs of life during CPR may aid the decision-making in the selection of appropriate candidates. Stringent patient selection for ECPR may produce higher survival rates but potentially withholds life-saving treatment in a significant proportion of survivors, why optimization of the selection criteria is still necessary.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the Danish Heart Foundation [20-R142-A9498-22178]; and Health Research Foundation of Central Denmark Region [R64-A3178-B1349] Survival and adherence to consensusSigns of life during CPR

A systematic approach to weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with refractory cardiac failure

BACKGROUND

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) is commonly used to provide haemodynamic support for patients with severe cardiac failure. However, timing ECMO weaning remains challenging. We aimed to examine if an integrative weaning approach based on predefined haemodynamic, respiratory and echocardiographic criteria is associated with successful weaning.

METHODS

All patients weaned from ECMO between April 2017 and April 2019 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, were consecutively enrolled. Predefined haemodynamic, respiratory and echocardiographic criteria were assessed before and during ECMO flow reduction. A weaning attempt was commenced in haemodynamic stable patients and patients remaining stable at minimal flow were weaned from ECMO. Comparisons were made between patients who met the criteria for weaning at first attempt and patients who did not meet these criteria. Patients completing a full weaning attempt with no further need for mechanical support within 24 h were defined as successfully weaned.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were included in the study, of whom 26 (68%) patients met the criteria for weaning. Among these patients, 25 (96%) could be successfully weaned. Successfully weaned patients were younger and had less need for inotropic support and ECMO duration was shorter. Fulfilling the weaning criteria was associated with successful weaning and both favourable 30-d survival and survival to discharge.

CONCLUSION

An integrative weaning approach based on haemodynamic, respiratory and echocardiographic criteria may strengthen the clinical decision process in predicting successful weaning in patients receiving ECMO for refractory cardiac failure.

Randomized Clinical Comparison of the Dual-Therapy CD34 Antibody-Covered Sirolimus-Eluting Combo Stent With the Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT X Trial

BACKGROUND

Target lesion failure remains an issue with contemporary drug-eluting stents. Thus, the dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34+ antibody-coated Combo stent (DTS) was designed to further improve early healing. This study aimed to investigate whether the DTS is noninferior to the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (SES) in an all-comers patient population.

METHODS

The SORT OUT X (Combo Stent Versus Orsiro Stent) trial, was a large-scale, randomized, multicenter, single-blind, 2-arm, noninferiority trial with registry-based follow-up. The primary end point target lesion failure was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization within 12 months, analyzed using intention-to-treat. The trial was powered for assessing target lesion failure noninferiority of the DTS compared with the SES with a predetermined noninferiority margin of 0.021.

RESULTS

A total of 3146 patients were randomized to treatment with the DTS (1578 patients; 2008 lesions) or SES (1568 patients; 1982 lesions). At 12 months, intention-to-treat analysis showed that 100 patients (6.3%) assigned the DTS and 58 patients (3.7%) assigned the SES met the primary end point (absolute risk difference, 2.6% [upper limit of 1-sided 95% CI, 4.1%]; P (noninferiority)=0.76). The SES was superior to the DTS (incidence rate ratios for target lesion failure, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.26-2.41]; P=0.00086). The difference was explained mainly by a higher incidence of target lesion revascularization in the DTS group compared with the SES group (53 [3.4%] vs. 24 [1.5%]; incidence rate ratio, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.37-3.61]; P=0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

The DTS did not confirm noninferiority to the SES for target lesion failure at 12 months in an all-comer population. The SES was superior to the DTS mainly because the DTS was associated with an increased risk of target lesion revascularization. However, rates of death, cardiac death, and myocardial infarction at 12 months did not differ significantly between the 2 stent groups. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03216733.

Dedicated plug based closure for large bore access -The MARVEL prospective registry

Objectives

To study safety and performance of the MANTA Vascular closure device (VCD) under real world conditions in 10 centers.

Background

The MANTA is a novel plug‐based device for large bore arteriotomy closure.

Methods

We included all eligible patients who underwent transfemoral large bore percutaneous procedures. Exclusion criteria were per operator's discretion and included severe calcification or marked tortuosity of the access vessel, presence of marked obesity/cachexia or a systolic blood pressure above 180 mmHg. The primary performance endpoint was time to hemostasis. Primary and secondary safety endpoints were major and minor access site related vascular complications up to 30 days, respectively. Vascular complications were adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee according to VARC‐2 criteria. We performed multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effect of baseline and procedural characteristics on any and major vascular complications.

Results

Between February 2018 and July 2019 500 patients were enrolled undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR, N = 496), Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV, N = 2), Mechanical circulatory support (MCS, N = 1) or Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR, N = 1). Mean age was 80.8 ± 6.6 years with a median STS‐score of 2.7 [IQR 2.0–4.3] %. MANTA access site complications were major in 20 (4%) and minor in 28 patients (5.6%). Median time to hemostasis was 50 [IQR 20–120] sec. Severe femoral artery calcification, scar presence in groin, longer procedure duration, female gender and history of hypertension were independent predictors for vascular complications.

Conclusion

In this study, MANTA appeared to be a safe and effective device for large bore access closure under real‐world conditions.

Long-Term Effects of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Coronary Hemodynamics in Patients With Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease and Severe Aortic Stenosis

Background As younger patients are being considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the assessment and treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease is taking on increased importance. Methods and Results Thirteen contemporary lower-risk patients with TAVI with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and moderate-severe coronary lesions were included. Patients underwent assessment of coronary hemodynamics in the presence of severe AS (pre-TAVI), in the absence of severe AS (immediately post-TAVI), and at longer-term follow-up (6 months post-TAVI). Fractional flow reserve decreased from 0.85 (0.76-0.88) pre-TAVI to 0.79 (0.74-0.83) post-TAVI, and then to 0.71 (0.65-0.77) at 6-month follow-up (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Conversely, instantaneous wave-free ratio was not significantly different: 0.82 (0.80-0.90) pre-TAVI, 0.83 (0.77-0.88) post-TAVI, and 0.83 (0.73-0.89) at 6 months (P=0.735). These changes are explained by the underlying coronary flow. Hyperemic whole-cycle coronary flow (fractional flow reserve flow) increased from 26.36 cm/s (23.82-31.82 cm/s) pre-TAVI to 30.78 cm/s (29.70-34.68 cm/s) post-TAVI (P=0.012), to 40.20 cm/s (32.14-50.00 cm/s) at 6-month follow-up (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Resting flow during the wave-free period of diastole was not significantly different: 25.48 cm/s (21.12-33.65 cm/s) pre-TAVI, 24.54 cm/s (20.74-27.88 cm/s) post-TAVI, and 25.89 cm/s (22.57-28.96 cm/s) at 6 months (P=0.500). Conclusions TAVI acutely improves whole-cycle hyperemic coronary flow, with ongoing sustained improvements at longer-term follow-up. This enhanced response to hyperemic stimuli appears to make fractional flow reserve assessment less suitable for patients with severe AS. Conversely, resting diastolic flow is not significantly influenced by the presence of severe AS. Resting indices of coronary stenosis severity, therefore, appear to be more appropriate for this patient population, although large-scale prospective randomized trials will be required to determine the role of coronary physiology in patients with severe AS.

Reduced Leaflet Motion after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Subclinical leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion of bioprosthetic aortic valves have been documented by four-dimensional computed tomography (CT). Whether anticoagulation can reduce these phenomena after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is not known.

METHODS

In a substudy of a large randomized trial, we randomly assigned patients who had undergone successful TAVR and who did not have an indication for long-term anticoagulation to a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy (rivaroxaban [10 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily) or an antiplatelet-based strategy (clopidogrel [75 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily). Patients underwent evaluation by four-dimensional CT at a mean (±SD) of 90±15 days after randomization. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with at least one prosthetic valve leaflet with grade 3 or higher motion reduction (i.e., involving >50% of the leaflet). Leaflet thickening was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients were enrolled. At least one prosthetic valve leaflet with grade 3 or higher motion reduction was found in 2 of 97 patients (2.1%) who had scans that could be evaluated in the rivaroxaban group, as compared with 11 of 101 (10.9%) in the antiplatelet group (difference, -8.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.5 to -1.9; P = 0.01). Thickening of at least one leaflet was observed in 12 of 97 patients (12.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 33 of 102 (32.4%) in the antiplatelet group (difference, -20.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -30.9 to -8.5). In the main trial, the risk of death or thromboembolic events and the risk of life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding were higher with rivaroxaban (hazard ratios of 1.35 and 1.50, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In a substudy of a trial involving patients without an indication for long-term anticoagulation who had undergone successful TAVR, a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy was more effective than an antiplatelet-based strategy in preventing subclinical leaflet-motion abnormalities. However, in the main trial, the rivaroxaban-based strategy was associated with a higher risk of death or thromboembolic complications and a higher risk of bleeding than the antiplatelet-based strategy. (Funded by Bayer; GALILEO-4D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02833948.).

479Preoperative global longitudinal strain is the best predictor of mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Background

Prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is variable. This might depend on preoperative evaluation of myocardial performance by other measurements than ejection fraction (EF).

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of preoperative global longitudinal strain (GLS) and the guidelines specified subtypes of aortic stenosis (AS) on mortality following TAVR.

Methods

We included 511 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR in the period July 2012–June 2017.

Patients were divided into guidelines-specified subgroups based on EF (EF: ≥50 (NEF) or <50% (LEF)), peak gradient (PG: ≥4 (HG) or <4 m/s (LG)) and flow status (stroke volume index (SVI): ≥35 (NF) or <35 ml/min/kg (LF)): (1) HG-NEF (n=228), (2) HG-LEF (n=91), (3) LG-LF-NEF (n=71) and (4) LG-LF-LEF (n=121). We also investigated the effect of replacing EF by GLS in the guideline specified subgroups (GLS ≤−14 (HGLS) and GLS >−14% (LGLS)).

Results

Mean follow up time was 1033 days. Mean age was 80.2±7.1 years. Median overall survival was 5.3±0.3 years. Comorbidity burden was higher in patients with LF – and LEF status in terms of a higher median plasma creatinine (103 [85; 135], p<0.001) and EurologII score (6.1 [3.4; 9.6], p<0.001).

LG-LF-LEF AS was associated with a significantly worse outcome compared with all other groups (p<0.005, Fig. 1A). High gradient status, irrespective of EF (p=0.88), was associated with the best prognosis with a median survival of 5.0±0.5 and 5.5±0.1 years for NEF and LEF, respectively.

Overall and in patients with HG-NEF, impaired GLS (>−14%) was associated with poor outcome (Fig. 1B–D). There was a trend towards a poorer prognosis with GLS >−14% in LG-LF-NEF AS (p=0.10).

In an univariate analysis impaired GLS >−14% (HR 2.04, p<0.005), LG-LF-LEF status (HR 1.82, p=0.001), PG <4m/s (HR 1.74, p=0.001) and tricuspid regurgitation gradient >30 mmHg (HR 1.63, p<0.001) were significant predictors of mortality in contrast to EF, SVI, age, gender and plasma creatinine.

GLS >−14% emerged as the only significant outcome predictor in a multivariate analysis (HR 1.93, p<0.05).

Figure 1

Conclusion

Impaired global longitudinal strain >−14% was the best individual echocardiographic predictor of overall survival in symptomatic severe AS and could identify a subgroup of patients with HG-NEF AS with a worse prognosis.

Comparison of Acute Versus Subacute Coronary Angiography in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the NONSTEMI Trial)

The optimal timing of coronary angiography (CAG) in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome without persisting ST-segment elevation (NST-ACS) remains undetermined. The NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction trial aimed to compare outcomes in NSTE-ACS patients randomized to acute CAG (STEMI-like approach) with patients randomized to medical therapy and subacute CAG. We randomized 496 patients with suspected NST-ACS based on symptoms and significant regional ST depressions and/or elevated point-of-care troponin T (POC-cTnT) (≥50 ng/l) to either acute CAG (<2 hours, n = 245) or subacute CAG (<72 hours, n = 251). The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, and readmission with congestive heart failure within 1 year from randomization. A final acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis was assigned to 429 (86.5%) patients. The median time from randomization to revascularization was 1.3 hours in the acute CAG group versus 51.1 hours in the subacute CAG group (p <0.001). The composite end point occurred in 25 patients (10.2%) in the acute CAG group and 29 (11.6%) in the subacute CAG group, p = 0.62. The acute CAG group had a 1-year all-cause mortality of 5.7% compared with 5.6% in the subacute CAG group, p = 0.96. In conclusion, neither the composite end point of all-cause death, reinfarction, and readmission with congestive heart failure nor mortality differed between an acute and subacute CAG approach in NSTE-ACS patients. However, identification of NSTE-ACS patients in the prehospital phase and direct triage to an invasive center is feasible, safe and may facilitate early diagnosis and revascularization.

Everolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes mellitus is associated with a higher risk of target lesion revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention. We compared clinical outcomes in patients with and without diabetes mellitus, treated with everolimus-eluting stents (EES; Synergy; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) or biolimus-eluting stents (BES; BioMatrix NeoFlex; Biosensors Interventional Technologies Pte Ltd., Singapore). In total, 2,764 patients were randomized to stent implantation with EES (n = 1,385, diabetes: n = 250) or the BES (n = 1,379, diabetes: n = 262), stratified by gender and diabetes. The primary end point, target lesion failure (TLF), was a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Secondary end points included individual components of TLF, all-cause death, and stent thrombosis. TLF was 2.1% lower in the EES versus the BES groups in patients with diabetes (3.6% vs 5.7%; rate ratios 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 1.41) and similar in patients without diabetes (4.1% vs 4.0%; rate ratios 0.99, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.51). In patients with diabetes, the point estimates of the individual components of TLF also favored the EES but CIs were wide. No interaction between stent type and presence of diabetes was found. The current subgroup analysis found that a thin-strut EES as compared with a thicker strut BES had a numerically lower TLF rate in patients with diabetes, but the subgroup analysis was underpowered for definite conclusions.

Effect of Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Ischemic postconditioning of the heart during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) induced by repetitive interruptions of blood flow to the ischemic myocardial region immediately after reopening of the infarct-related artery may limit myocardial damage.

Objective

To determine whether ischemic postconditioning can improve the clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Design, Setting, And Participants

In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients with onset of symptoms within 12 hours, STEMI, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 0-1 flow in the infarct-related artery at arrival were randomized to conventional PCI or postconditioning. Inclusion began on March 21, 2011, through February 2, 2014, and follow-up was completed on February 2, 2016. Analysis was based on intention to treat.

Interventions

Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to conventional primary PCI, including stent implantation, or postconditioning performed as 4 repeated 30-second balloon occlusions followed by 30 seconds of reperfusion immediately after opening of the infarct-related artery and before stent implantation.

Main Outcome and Measures

A combination of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure.

Results

During the inclusion period, 1234 patients (975 men [79.0%] and 259 women [21.0%]; mean [SD] age, 62 [11] years) underwent randomization in the trial. Median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range, 24-58 months). The primary outcome occurred in 69 patients (11.2%) who underwent conventional primary PCI and in 65 (10.5%) who underwent postconditioning (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.30; P = .66). The hazard ratios were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.49-1.14; P = .18) for all-cause death and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.60-1.64; P = .96) for heart failure.

Conclusions and Relevance

Routine ischemic postconditioning during primary PCI failed to reduce the composite outcome of death from any cause and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with STEMI and TIMI grade 0-1 flow at arrival.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01435408.

Short- and Long-Term Mortality and Stroke Risk After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

No published studies have compared the outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the outcome in the general population. Thus, it is unknown whether TAVI restores normal life expectancy and stroke risk. Furthermore, despite the increasing use of TAVI, only little is known about the temporal trends for TAVI regarding patient characteristics and outcomes. We identified all Danish patients treated with TAVI from 2006 to 2014 (n = 1,631) and 9,737 general population controls matched by gender, age, and co-morbidity. The primary end point was a composite end point of all-cause mortality and stroke. During the first 90 days, the risk of the combined end point, the stroke risk, and mortality were significantly higher among TAVI patients compared with controls (9.4%, 7.5%, and 2.5%, respectively, in TAVI patients compared with 2.0%, 1.6%, and 0.5% in controls). After 90 days, there were no differences (adjusted mortality rate ratio, stroke rate ratio, and mortality or stroke rate ratio 0.92 [0.79 to 1.06], 1.32 [0.98 to 1.78], and 1.00 [0.90 to 1.10], respectively). During the study period, there were small changes in the characteristics of patients treated with TAVI; however, more patients were treated by transfemoral access; fewer needed blood transfusions, hospital stays were shorter, and the overall mortality rate decreased. In conclusion, 90 days after TAVI, the stroke risk and mortality of the TAVI patients were comparable with the stroke risk and mortality of the general population. Over time, the patient risk profiles have remained largely unchanged; however, outcomes have improved substantially, including lower short- and long-term mortality.

Predictive value of routine point-of-care cardiac troponin T measurement for prehospital diagnosis and risk-stratification in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive value of routine prehospital point-of-care cardiac troponin T measurement for diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All prehospital emergency medical service vehicles in the Central Denmark Region were equipped with a point-of-care cardiac troponin T device (Roche Cobas h232) for routine use in all patients with a suspected acute myocardial infarction. During the study period, 1 June 2012-30 November 2015, prehospital point-of-care cardiac troponin T measurements were performed in a total of 19,615 cases seen by the emergency medical service and 18,712 point-of-care cardiac troponin T measurements in 15,781 individuals were matched with an admission. A final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was confirmed in 2187 cases and a total of 2150 point-of-care cardiac troponin T measurements (11.0%) had a value ≥50 ng/l, including 966 with acute myocardial infarction (sensitivity: 44.2%, specificity: 92.8%). Patients presenting with a prehospital point-of-care cardiac troponin T value ≥50 ng/l had a one-year mortality of 24% compared with 4.8% in those with values <50 ng/l, log-rank: p<0.001. The following variables showed the strongest association with mortality in multivariable analysis: point-of-care cardiac troponin T≥50 ng/l (hazard ratio 2.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.90-2.33), congestive heart failure (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval: 1.74-2.14), diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-1.59) and age, one-year increase (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and a prehospital point-of-care cardiac troponin T ≥50 ng/l have a poor prognosis irrespective of the final diagnosis. Routine troponin measurement in the prehospital setting has a high predictive value and can be used to identify high-risk patients even before hospital arrival so that they may be re-routed directly for advanced care at an invasive centre.

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings

Background

Data on the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) are sparse. In patients with intermediate (40–70%) coronary stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography, we investigated the association of replacing standard myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR_CT testing with downstream utilization of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and the diagnostic yield of ICA (rate of no obstructive disease, and rate of revascularization).

Methods and Results

This was a single‐center observational study of symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred to coronary computed tomography angiography between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into 3 historical groups based on the adjunctive functional testing approach: myocardial perfusion imaging (n=1332) or FFR_CT “implementation” (n=800) or “clinical use” (n=1391). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the average period effect on outcomes. Patients in the FFR_CT clinical use group versus the myocardial perfusion imaging group were older and had higher pretest probability of obstructive disease. After adjusting for baseline risk characteristics, there was a reduction in downstream ICA utilization (absolute risk difference: −4.2; 95% CI, −6.9 to −1.6; P=0.002). In patients referred to ICA, findings of no obstructive coronary artery disease decreased (−12.8%; 95% CI, −22.2 to −3.4; P=0.008) and rate of coronary revascularization increased (14.1%; 95% CI, 3.3–24.9; P=0.01), as did availability of functional information for guidance of revascularization (27.8%; 95% CI, 11.3–44.4; P<0.001) after clinical adoption of FFR_CT.

Conclusions

Replacing adjunctive myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR_CT testing for functional assessment of intermediate stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography in stable coronary artery disease was associated with less ICA utilization, and a higher ICA diagnostic yield. The findings in this observational study needs confirmation in prospective, randomized trials.

Severe Mental Illness and Clinical Outcome After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The mechanisms behind the increased mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction and co-existing severe mental illness (SMI) compared with non-SMI patients remain unclear. We studied 12,102 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, of whom 457 had SMI. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) at 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, and maximum follow-up. Patients with SMI were younger, more often women, had higher prevalence of active smoking and diabetes, and had a longer duration of symptoms than patients without SMI. There were no substantial differences in the in-hospital treatment of patients with and without SMI. Fewer SMI patients were treated with the recommended medications during follow up; however, the absolute differences were modest. Compared with non-SMI patients, the cumulative risks of major adverse cardiac events after 1 year, 2 years, and maximum follow-up were higher among SMI patients [hazard ratio 1.27 (1.02 to 1.57), hazard ratio 1.32 (1.09 to 1.60), and hazard ratio 1.43 (1.25 to 1.65), respectively]. Even after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics, the differences in outcome persisted. In conclusion, compared with patients without SMI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention treated patients with SMI had a worse baseline risk profile. No differences in in-hospital treatments were found. Although the absolute differences were small, SMI patients were less likely to receive recommended medical treatment during follow up and they face a worse prognosis, even after adjustment for differences in risk profile. This indicates that SMI per se is likely to have an adverse effect on the prognosis following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Denmark: coronary and structural heart interventions from 2010 to 2015

Interventional cardiology in Denmark has been carried out since the mid 1980s. Interventional cardiology is only performed at a few high-volume centres. Healthcare coverage is universal and is essentially free of charge. Hospitals are mostly publicly owned and financed by fixed budgets and, in part, an activity-based funding system. Approximately 30,000 coronary angiographies (CAG), 10,000 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) of which approximately 25% are primary PCIs, and 500 transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVIs) are carried out each year. The numbers of CAG and PCI have reached a plateau in recent years, whereas structural heart interventions, in particular TAVI, are increasing. Around 90% of all patients treated with PCI have a stent implanted, with more than 95% of these being drug-eluting stents. There is a low but increasing use of bioabsorbable scaffolds and drug-eluting balloons.

Prehospital triage of patients suffering severe dyspnoea using N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, the PreBNP trial: a randomised controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine whether the addition of brain natriuretic peptide measurement to the routine diagnostic work-up by prehospital critical care team physicians improves triage in patients with severe dyspnoea.

METHODS

Prehospital critical care team physicians randomly assigned patients older than 18 years with severe dyspnoea to routine diagnostic work-up or diagnostic work-up with incorporated point-of-care N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurement. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with dyspnoea of primary cardiac origin triaged directly to a department of cardiology.

RESULTS

A total of 747 patients were randomly assigned and 711 patients consented to participate, 350 were randomly assigned to the NT-proBNP group and 361 to the routine work-up group. NT-proBNP was measured in 90% (315/350) of patients in the NT-proBNP group and in 19% (70/361) of patients in the routine work-up group. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with dyspnoea of primary cardiac origin triaged directly to a department of cardiology between the NT-proBNP group and the routine work-up group (75% vs. 69%, P=0.22) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Sensitivity analysis according to the de facto diagnostics performed showed results consistent with this. No differences in hospital length of stay, intensive care unit admission rates or mortality between the NT-proBNP group and the routine work-up group were observed.

CONCLUSION

Routine supplementary point-of-care measurement of NT-proBNP in patients with severe dyspnoea did not improve triage of patients with dyspnoea primarily caused by heart disease. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02050282.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Thrombosis: Incidence, Predisposing Factors, and Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the incidence, clinical implications, and predisposing factors of transcatheter heart valve (THV) thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

OBJECTIVES

The authors assessed the incidence, potential predictors, and clinical implications of THV thrombosis as determined by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) after TAVR.

METHODS

Among 460 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with the Edwards Sapien XT or Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) THV, 405 (88%) underwent MDCT in addition to transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography 1 to 3 months post-TAVR. MDCT scans were evaluated for hypoattenuated leaflet thickening that indicated THV thrombosis.

RESULTS

MDCT verified THV thrombosis in 28 of 405 (7%) patients. A total of 23 patients had subclinical THV thrombosis, whereas 5 (18%) patients experienced clinically overt obstructive THV thrombosis. THV thrombosis risk did not differ among different generations of THVs (8% vs. 6%; p = 0.42). The risk of THV thrombosis in patients who did not receive warfarin was higher compared with patients who received warfarin (10.7% vs. 1.8%; risk ratio [RR]: 6.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86 to 19.84). A larger THV was associated with an increased risk of THV thrombosis (p = 0.03). In multivariable analysis, a 29-mm THV (RR: 2.89; 95% CI: 1.44 to 5.80) and no post-TAVR warfarin treatment (RR: 5.46; 95% CI: 1.68 to 17.7) independently predicted THV thrombosis. Treatment with warfarin effectively reverted THV thrombosis and normalized THV function in 85% of patients as documented by follow-up transesophageal echocardiography and MDCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of THV thrombosis in this large study was 7%. A larger THV size may predispose to THV thrombosis, whereas treatment with warfarin appears to have a protective effect. Although often subclinical, THV thrombosis may have important clinical implications.

Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite successful treatment of the culprit artery lesion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation, thrombotic embolisation occurs in some cases, which impairs the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of deferred stent implantation versus standard PCI in patients with STEMI.

METHODS

We did this open-label, randomised controlled trial at four primary PCI centres in Denmark. Eligible patients (aged >18 years) had acute onset symptoms lasting 12 h or less, and ST-segment elevation of 0·1 mV or more in at least two or more contiguous electrocardiographic leads or newly developed left bundle branch block. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via an electronic web-based system with permuted block sizes of two to six, to receive either standard primary PCI with immediate stent implantation or deferred stent implantation 48 h after the index procedure if a stabilised flow could be obtained in the infarct-related artery. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospital admission for heart failure, recurrent infarction, and any unplanned revascularisation of the target vessel within 2 years' follow-up. Patients, investigators, and treating clinicians were not masked to treatment allocation. We did analysis by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01435408.

FINDINGS

Between March 1, 2011, and Feb 28, 2014, we randomly assigned 1215 patients to receive either standard PCI (n=612) or deferred stent implantation (n=603). Median follow-up time was 42 months (IQR 33-49). Events comprising the primary endpoint occurred in 109 (18%) patients who had standard PCI and in 105 (17%) patients who had deferred stent implantation (hazard ratio 0·99, 95% CI 0·76-1·29; p=0·92). Procedure-related myocardial infarction, bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery, contrast-induced nephopathy, or stroke occurred in 28 (5%) patients in the conventional PCI group versus 27 (4%) patients in the deferred stent implantation group, with no significant differences between groups.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with STEMI, routine deferred stent implantation did not reduce the occurrence of death, heart failure, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularisation compared with conventional PCI. Results from ongoing randomised trials might shed further light on the concept of deferred stenting in this patient population.

FUNDING

Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, and Danish Council for Strategic Research.

Clinical Use of Coronary CTA-Derived FFR for Decision-Making in Stable CAD

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to assess the real-world clinical utility of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFR_CT) for decision-making in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

FFR_CT has shown promising results in identifying lesion-specific ischemia. The real-world feasibility and influence on the diagnostic work-up of FFR_CT testing in patients suspected of having CAD are unknown.

METHODS

We reviewed the complete diagnostic work-up of nonemergent patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography over a 12-month period at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, including all patients with new-onset chest pain with no known CAD and with intermediate-range coronary lesions (lumen reduction, 30% to 70%) referred for FFR_CT. The study evaluated the consequences on downstream diagnostic testing, the agreement between FFR_CT and invasively measured FFR or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and the short-term clinical outcome after FFR_CT testing.

RESULTS

Among 1,248 patients referred for computed tomography angiography, 189 patients (mean age 59 years; 59% male) were referred for FFR_CT, with a conclusive FFR_CT result obtained in 185 (98%). FFR_CT was ≤0.80 in 31% of patients and 10% of vessels. After FFR_CT testing, invasive angiography was performed in 29%, with FFR measured in 19% and iFR in 1% of patients (with a tendency toward declining FFR-iFR guidance during the study period). FFR_CT ≤0.80 correctly classified 73% (27 of 37) of patients and 70% (37 of 53) of vessels using FFR ≤0.80 or iFR ≤0.90 as the reference standard. In patients with FFR_CT >0.80 being deferred from invasive coronary angiography, no adverse cardiac events occurred during a median follow-up period of 12 (range 6 to 18 months) months.

CONCLUSIONS

FFR_CT testing is feasible in real-world symptomatic patients with intermediate-range stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography. Implementation of FFR_CT for clinical decision-making may influence the downstream diagnostic workflow of patients. Patients with an FFR_CT value >0.80 being deferred from invasive coronary angiography have a favorable short-term prognosis.

Feasibility and early safety of hybrid coronary revascularisation combining off-pump coronary surgery through J-hemisternotomy with percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

To assess the procedural feasibility and early safety of hybrid coronary revascularisation, combining off-pump left internal mammary artery grafting to the left descending coronary artery (LAD) through an inferior J-hemisternotomy (JOPCAB) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of non-LAD lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease involving LAD were included in this prospective registry. Hybrid revascularisation was performed by JOPCAB, either prior to PCI (89%) or following PCI (11%). In 96% of the cases, the procedure was carried out according to the preoperative strategy and without perioperative (24 hours) major adverse cardiac or cerebral events. At one month, we observed no deaths, one stroke and two procedure-related myocardial infarctions. Five patients underwent reoperation for graft dysfunction, four of whom were identified by angiography without prior signs of ischaemia. Reoperation due to bleeding was necessary in six patients, and nine patients received red blood cell transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective registry documented promising procedural feasibility and early safety of coronary hybrid revascularisation combining JOPCAB with PCI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01496664.

Time to treatment-door-to-balloon time is not everything

International guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) recommend various performance measures to monitor the quality of STEMI systems of care. Door-to-balloon (D2B) time (arrival at hospital to percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI) and overall health care system delay (first medical contact to reperfusion) are acknowledged as valuable performance measures when treating patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, there is confusion regarding the exact definition of these performance measures, and moreover system delay and PCI-related delay (the extra delay acceptable to perform PPCI instead of fibrinolysis) are often used synonymously, which add confusion when considering reperfusion strategy. The present paper calls for a consensus regarding the use and definition of objective performance measures when treating patients with STEMI, and exemplifies why it is insufficient just to focus on D2B time.

Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Mechanical chest compressions have been proposed to provide high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but despite the growing use of mechanical chest compression devices, only few studies have addressed their impact on CPR quality. This study aims to evaluate mechanical chest compressions provided by LUCAS-2 (Lund University Cardiac Assist System) compared with manual chest compression in a cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases.

METHODS

In this prospective study conducted in the Central Denmark Region, Denmark, the emergency medical service attempted resuscitation and reported data on 696 non-traumatic OHCA patients between April 2011 and February 2013. Of these, 155 were treated with LUCAS CPR after an episode with manual CPR. The CPR quality was evaluated using transthoracic impedance measurements collected from the LIFEPAK 12 defibrillator, and the effect was assessed in terms of chest compression rate, no-flow time and no-flow fraction; the fraction of time during resuscitation in which the patient is without spontaneous circulation receiving no chest compression.

RESULTS

The median total episode duration was 21 minutes, and the episode with LUCAS CPR was significantly longer than the manual CPR episode, 13 minutes vs. 5 minutes, p < 0.001. The no-flow fraction was significantly lower during LUCAS CPR (16%) than during manual CPR (35%); difference 19% (95% CI: 16% to 21%; p < 0.001). No differences were found in pre- and post-shock no-flow time throughout manual CPR and LUCAS CPR. Contrary to the manual CPR, the average compression rate during LUCAS CPR was in conformity with the current Guidelines for Resuscitation, 102/minute vs. 124/minute, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical chest compressions provided by the LUCAS device improve CPR quality by significantly reducing the NFF and by improving the quality of chest compression compared with manual CPR during OHCA resuscitation. However, data on end-tidal Co2 and chest compression depth surrogate parameters of CPR quality could not be reported.