Standardized reporting for systematic global evaluation of axial spondyloarthritis: An evidence-based and consensus-driven initiative

INTRODUCTION

National and international scientific societies advocate for a regular, systematic, and standardized global evaluation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. However, there are no recommendations specifying the content of this global evaluation. This initiative aimed to propose a standardized reporting framework, using evidence-based and consensus approaches, to collect data on all domains of axSpA.

METHODS

A literature review and consensus process involved a steering committee and an expert panel of 37 rheumatologists and health professionals. The first steering committee took place in March 2022 and identified the main domains for inclusion in the standardized report. A hierarchical literature review was conducted to identify items within these domains and tools for assessment. The items and tools for assessment were discussed and consensus was reached through a vote session during an expert meeting that took place in March 2023.

RESULTS

The steering committee identified four main domains to include in the standardized reporting framework: disease assessment, comorbidities, lifestyle, and quality of life. Items and tools for assessment were adopted after the expert meeting. Additionally, recommendations regarding digital tools (websites, apps, social media) were provided.

CONCLUSION

This initiative led to a consensus, based on evidence and expertise, on a reporting framework for use during periodic systematic global evaluations of axSpa in daily practice.

Influence of perceived barriers and facilitators for physical activity on physical activity levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study of 150 patients

Background

Barriers and facilitators to physical activity in inflammatory arthritis can be assessed through the Inflammatory arthritis FAcilitators and Barriers (IFAB) questionnaire. The objective was to measure the correlation between IFAB and self-reported physical activity levels.

Methods

This was an international, multicentric, cross-sectional study in 2019–20. Consecutive spondyloarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients completed the 10-item IFAB, which ranges from − 70 to 70 with lower scores indicating more barriers. Physical activity was measured by the IPAQ-S questionnaire, steps per day collected by smartphone, and psychological readiness to change by stages of behaviour change. Spearman correlations and multivariable linear regression were calculated.

Results

Of 245 patients included, 150 were analysed: 69 (46%) axSpA, 63 (42%) RA, 18 (12%) PsA. Mean age was 48.6 years (standard deviation, SD 17.1), mean disease duration 11.7 (10.1) years and 60% were women. Barriers to physical activity were moderate: mean IFAB, 6 (SD 19.2); 39 (26%) patients scored less than − 5, corresponding to significant barriers. The mean physical activity was 2837 (SD 2668, median 1784) MET-minutes per week. The IPAQ-S questionnaire was correlated with the IFAB (rho 0.28, p < 0.001), as well as the stage of behaviour change (rho 0.35, p < 0.001) though not with steps per day. Multivariable analyses were confirmatory.

Conclusion

Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity were correlated with physical activity, indicating that targeting patients with high barriers and low facilitators to physical activity could be an effective option to improve physical activity levels.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial NCT04426747. Registered 11 June 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04792-7.

Exploring remission concept in axial spondyloarthritis through the perception of rheumatologists using vignettes and priority ratings

OBJECTIVES

The optimal treatment target in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is remission; however, a consensual definition of remission is lacking. Our objective was to explore rheumatologists' perception of remission using vignette cases and a priority exercise.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists' perceptions of remission in axSpA was performed in 2020 using (a) 36 vignette cases, with a single clinical picture and 3 varying parameters (axial pain [ranging from 2 to 5 on a 0-10 scale], fatigue [2-8], and morning stiffness [<15 min, 30 min or 1 h], assessed as remission yes/no; (b) prioritization of elements to consider for remission from a list of 12 items: BASDAI, ASDAS, elements of BASDAI and ASDAS including CRP, NSAIDs use, extra-articular manifestations (EAMs), and other explanations of symptoms e.g. fibromyalgia. Analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

Overall, 200 French rheumatologists participated in 2,400 vignette evaluations. Of these, 463 (19%) were classified as remission. The 6 vignette cases representing 56% of all remission cases had <15 min duration of morning stiffness and axial pain ≤3/10, regardless of fatigue levels. Prioritized items for remission were: morning stiffness (75%), EAMs (75%), NSAID use (71%), axial pain (68%), and CRP (66%).

CONCLUSIONS

When conceptualizing remission in axSpA, rheumatologists took into account morning stiffness and axial pain as expected; the link between remission and fatigue was much weaker. Furthermore, rheumatologists also included EAMs and NSAID use in the concept of remission. Consensus is needed for definition of remission in axSpA.

POS0243 WHAT DOES REMISSION IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS MEAN FOR CLINICIANS? AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF 200 FRENCH RHEUMATOLOGISTS BASED ON A VIGNETTE EXERCISE INCLUDING 36 CASES AND PRIORITY RATINGS

Background:

Treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) aims to achieve and maintain clinical remission/inactive disease or alternatively, low disease activity [1]. However, there is no consensual definition of remission in axSpA: the T2T international task force has proposed Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease, but this definition is not widely accepted [1, 2].

Objectives:

To explore rheumatologists’ perception of remission in axSpA, using vignette cases and a priority exercise.

Methods:

A steering group of 7 rheumatologists designed a national cross-sectional survey during two face-to-face meetings in 2019-2020. The survey comprised 36 vignette cases: fixed elements included the clinical picture (34 year-old-male with confirmed axSpA, normal C-reactive protein (CRP), without synovitis, enthesitis, dactylitis or extra-articular manifestations) and there were 3 varying parameters (axial pain (0-10) [ranging 2 to 5], fatigue (0-10) [2 to 8], and morning stiffness [<15 minutes, 30 minutes or 1 hour]. For each vignette, the rheumatologist answered binarily: “do you consider this patient in remission: yes/no”. The second part of the survey comprised a priority rating (0-10 priority and 4 top items) of elements important to consider for remission, from a list of 12 items (BASDAI, ASDAS, elements of BASDAI and ASDAS including CRP, NSAIDs use, extra-articular manifestations, and other explanations for the symptoms e.g., fibromyalgia). The analysis was descriptive.

Results:

Overall, 200 French rheumatologists participated between June and September 2020. Out of 2,400 vignette evaluations (mean of 66 evaluations per vignette), 463 (19%) were classified as remission by rheumatologists. Six vignette cases constituted 56% of all remission cases (Figure 1): these comprised a short duration of morning stiffness (<15 minutes), a low VAS axial pain (2 or 3) but with varying levels of VAS fatigue. When the duration of morning stiffness increased from 15 to 30 minutes and VAS axial pain increased from 2-3 to 4-5 independently, classification as remission decreased from 42% to 12% and from 28-33% to 5-11%, respectively. However, when VAS fatigue increased, it impacted less remission.

In priority ratings, 4 items were selected as important by 68-75% of rheumatologists: morning stiffness and axial pain (both included in the vignettes), as well as extra-articular manifestations and NSAID use, whereas only 18% selected fatigue. BASDAI was cited as the 1st priority criteria by 24% of rheumatologists and ASDAS as the 2nd by 16% of rheumatologists.

Figure 1.

Frequencies of the declared remission states by rheumatologists for each of the 36 vignette cases

Conclusion:

Morning stiffness, axial pain, NSAIDs use, and extra-articular manifestations seem to impact the physicians’ perception of remission in axSpA, whereas fatigue has less impact on remission for rheumatologists. Consensus is needed on remission in axSpA.

References:

[1Smolen JS et al. Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:3–17.

[2]Wendling D et al. 2018 update of French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations about the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2018;85:275–84.

Funding:

This study was funded and organized by Novartis France

Disclosure of Interests:

Krystel Aouad: None declared, Daniel Wendling: None declared, Anne BAGLIN Employee of: Novartis, Maxime Breban: None declared, sabrina DADOUN: None declared, Christophe Hudry: None declared, Anna Moltó: None declared, Edouard Pertuiset: None declared, Laure Gossec: None declared

POS0274-HPR BARRIERS TO PHYSICAL ACTIVITY COLLECTED BY THE IFAB QUESTIONNAIRE CORRELATE WITH LEVELS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS OR SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF 150 PATIENTS

Background:

Physical activity is important for patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA), such as spondyloarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). They are more prone to physical inactivity but derive specific benefits from regular physical activity (1,2). It is not easy to modify physical activity level (3). Barriers and facilitators to physical activity can be assessed through questionnaires (4), however, it is important to demonstrate a link between these explanatory elements and physical activity levels.

Objectives:

To measure the correlation between barriers and facilitators to physical activity, assessed through a simple questionnaire, and self-reported physical activity levels.

Methods:

This was an international, multicentric, cross-sectional study performed between October 2019 and June 2020 (ClinicalTrial NCT04426747). Consecutive patients were included if they had definite axSpA, RA or PsA, were aged above 18 and able to walk. Barriers and facilitators to physical activity were measured using the 10-item Inflammatory arthritis Facilitators and barriers questionnaire (IFAB) (5). The IFAB ranges -70 to 70 with lower scores indicating more barriers; scores below -5 correspond to significant barriers. Physical activity was measured by the IPAQ-S questionnaire (6). Exploratory analyses used steps per day collected by smartphone, and psychological readiness to change by stages of behavior change. Statistical analysis used Spearman correlation (rho, p<0.05), Student T test or multivariate analysis using R version 3.5.1. There was no imputation of missing data.

Results:

Of 245 patients included, 150 had analysable data (69 (46%) axSpA, 63 (42%) RA, 18 (12%) PsA). Mean age was 48.6 years (SD 17.1), mean disease duration 11.7 (10.1) years and 60% were women. The mean score of barriers and facilitators to physical activity was 6.0 (SD 19.2, median 4) (Figure 1). A total of 39 (26%) patients scored less than -5, which could justify a targeted intervention. The mean physical activity was 2837 (SD 2668, median 1784) Metabolic Equivalent of Task min per week. Physical activity was correlated with score of barriers and facilitators to physical activity in linear regression (rho 0.28, p<0.001), as well as the stage of behavior change regarding active lifestyle (rho 0.35, p<0.001). No correlation was observed with steps per day (Table 1)

Table 1

for abstract: correlation between IFAB questionnaire, each items and level of physical activity with or without extreme values

ItemCorrelation with IPAQ-S min/met/week, rhoCorrelation with stage of behavior change, rhoCorrelation with mean steps per day, rhoTotal IFAB score0.28 ***0.35 ***0.08Item 10.29 ***0.16 *0.16 *Item 20.060.020.05Item 30.080.16 *0.01Item 40.130.09-0.07Item 5-0.090.100.07Item 60.22 **0.25 ***-0.05Item 70.22 **0.20 **0.12Item 80.16 *0.26 ***0.11Item 90.150.33 ***0.11Item 100.090.17 *0.02Social support questions0.140.27 ***-0.03Psychological and knowledge status questions0.22 **0.16 *0.09

*=P<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001

Conclusion:

Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity are correlated with physical activity. Targeting patients with high barriers and low facilitators to physical activity could be an effective option to improve physical activity levels.

References:

[1]O’DWYER T., et al. Rheumatology 2014. Vol. 53, n° 10, pp. 1812-1817.

[2]OSTHOFF, A et al. 2018. Vol. 77, n° 9, pp. 1251-1260. DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213585.

[3]MARLEY, J, et al: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. Vol. 18, pp. 482. DOI 10.1186/s12891-017-1836-2.

[4]COSTE, N., et al. 2019. DOI 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.07.009.

[5]DAVERGNE, T, et al. Rheumatology International 2020. DOI 10.1007/s00296-020-04692-4.

[6]LEE, PH, et al. 2011. Vol. 8, pp. 115. DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115.

Figure 1.

Distribution of the IFAB score Footnote: Y axis: effectifs, X axis: IFAB score (possibles values from -70 to 70)

Acknowledgements:

I have no acknowledgements to declare.We thank the following coinvestigators: Sylvie Rozenberg, Beatrice Banneville, Rachida Inaoui, Emmanuelle Dernis, Athan Baillet and Catherine Beauvais, and we thank Hervé Servy for expert CRO advice

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

MTX optimization or adding bDMARD equally improve disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the prospective study STRATEGE

Objectives

The STRATEGE (Therapeutic Strategy in Patients Treated With Methotrexate for Rheumatoid Arthritis) study aimed to describe treatment strategies in current practice in RA biologic DMARD (bDMARD)-naïve patients with an inadequate response to MTX therapy, and to compare clinical efficacy of the different therapeutic strategies on disease activity after 6 months.

Methods

The main inclusion criteria of this prospective, observational, multicentre study were confirmed RA diagnosis, treatment by MTX monotherapy and need for therapeutic management modification.

Results

The 722 patients included had a mean (s.d.) RA duration of 5.3 (6.7) years, a mean DAS28 of 4.0 (1.1); they were all receiving MTX monotherapy, 68% oral, at a mean dose of 15.0 (4.1) mg/week. Two major strategies were identified: (i) MTX monotherapy dose and/or route optimization (72%) and (ii) bDMARD initiation ± MTX (16%). MTX dosing was modified for 70% of patients, maintained (dose and route) for 28% of patients and interrupted for 2%. bDMARDs were started when the MTX mean dose was 17.4 mg/week, 56% parenterally; MTX was maintained concomitantly for 96% of patients. Six-month follow-up results adjusted by propensity score showed that both options were equally successful in improving disease activity and physical function, with 63 and 68% of good-to-moderate EULAR responses, respectively.

Conclusion

The STRATEGE study shows the importance of initial MTX treatment optimization before initiation of a biological treatment and emphasizes the importance of treat-to-target strategy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02288520.

Prediction of Work Impact in Axial Spondyloarthritis by the Work Instability Scale: A Prospective Cohort Study of 101 Patients

OBJECTIVE

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) may have an effect on work. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Work Instability Scale (AS-WIS) assesses difficulties at work. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the AS-WIS on work impact.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study with 2 timepoints (at baseline and after 1.5 yrs) that included patients with axSpA who had paid employment. Patients completed the AS-WIS at baseline and work instability was scored as moderate/high if ≥ 11 (0-20 scale). At follow-up, adverse work outcomes (AWO) were grouped as moderate (short-term sick leave) or severe AWO (long-term sick leave, disability, unemployment). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explain AWO.

RESULTS

Of 101 patients, mean age 45 (SD 9) years, 52% male, disease duration was 14 (SD 8) years. The Bath AS Disease Activity Index and the Bath AS Functional Index were 34 (SD 21) and 23 (SD 23), respectively, and 69 (68%) received a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. At baseline, 46 (46%) patients had moderate/high AS-WIS. At 1.5 years of follow-up, 37 patients (36%) had AWO: 25 patients (25%) a short-term sick leave, and 12 patients (12%, 7/100 patient-years) a severe AWO. Independent baseline factors associated with AWO were a moderate/high AS-WIS score (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.04-7.22) and shorter disease duration (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99).

CONCLUSION

In patients with axSpA, a moderate/high AS-WIS score was predictive of AWO in this population with well-controlled axSpA. This short questionnaire can be helpful to screen for future difficulties at work.

Impact of persistence with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors on healthcare resource utilization and costs in chronic inflammatory joint diseases

AIM

To assess persistence with subcutaneous (SC) tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors as well as the impact of persistence on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with chronic inflammatory joint diseases.

METHODS

In this cohort study using population-based French claims data (from 2011 to 2014), we measured persistence with SC TNF inhibitors within 12 months (M0-12) following treatment initiation in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced users (divided into three cohorts: rheumatoid arthritis [RA], ankylosing spondylitis [AS] and psoriatic arthritis [PsA]). Persistent patients were propensity score matched to nonpersistent patients at M12. The impact of persistence status on HCRU and costs was assessed during M12-24.

RESULTS

Of treatment-naïve (n = 3,804) and treatment-experienced (n = 2,279) users, only 56.1% and 46.8% were persistent at M12, respectively. Nonpersistent patients had more outpatient visits, computerized tomography scans, spine or joint magnetic resonance imaging procedures and disease-related hospitalizations, while persistent patients had more rheumatologist visits. Nonpersistent patients had lower drug costs but higher nondrug-related healthcare and hospitalization costs than persistent patients. In AS and PsA, overall healthcare costs were similar in persistent and nonpersistent patients. In RA, overall healthcare costs were lower in persistent patients (15,753€ vs 17,590€ in treatment-naïve and 17,622€ vs 21,177€ in treatment-experienced).

CONCLUSION

Persistence with SC TNF inhibitors within first 12 months following treatment initiation was low in both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. Differences were observed in distribution of costs between persistent and nonpersistent patients, showing that nonpersistence with SC TNF inhibitors can lead to increased HCRU and higher costs.

Data to be collected for an optimal management of axial spondyloarthritis in daily practice: Proposal from evidence-based and consensual approaches

OBJECTIVE

To propose a list of variables to be collected right after the diagnosis has been made and during the follow-up of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) for an optimal management in daily practice.

METHODS

The process comprised (1) the evaluation of the interest of 51 variables proposed for the assessment of ax-SpA by means of a systematic literature research; (2) a consensus process involving 78 hospital-based or office-based rheumatologists, considering the collection of each variable in a 4 grade scale from "not very useful/useless" to "mandatory"; (3) a consensus on the minimum interval of time for periodic assessment of the selected variables on a 5 grade scale from "at each visit" to "never to be re-collected".

RESULTS

The systematic literature research retrieved a total of 14,133 abstracts, of which 213 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Data to be collected at the initial systematic review comprised 5 patient's self-administered questionnaires, 3 variables of the physician's interview, 2 variables of the physical examination, 2 variables of the specific ax-SpA imaging and 2 other investigations. Two variables were recommended to be systematically collected at each visit, 1 variable twice a year, 6 variables yearly and 1 variable every 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an evidence-based and an expert consensus approaches, this initiative defined a core set of variables to be collected and reported right after the diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with ax-SpA in daily practice.

Detection of Flares by Decrease in Physical Activity, Collected Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Rheumatoid Arthritis or Axial Spondyloarthritis: An Application of Machine Learning Analyses in Rheumatology

OBJECTIVE

Flares in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) may influence physical activity. The aim of this study was to assess longitudinally the association between patient-reported flares and activity-tracker-provided steps per minute, using machine learning.

METHODS

This prospective observational study (ActConnect) included patients with definite RA or axial SpA. For a 3-month time period, physical activity was assessed continuously by number of steps/minute, using a consumer grade activity tracker, and flares were self-assessed weekly. Machine-learning techniques were applied to the data set. After intrapatient normalization of the physical activity data, multiclass Bayesian methods were used to calculate sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values of the machine-generated models of physical activity in order to predict patient-reported flares.

RESULTS

Overall, 155 patients (1,339 weekly flare assessments and 224,952 hours of physical activity assessments) were analyzed. The mean ± SD age for patients with RA (n = 82) was 48.9 ± 12.6 years and was 41.2 ± 10.3 years for those with axial SpA (n = 73). The mean ± SD disease duration was 10.5 ± 8.8 years for patients with RA and 10.8 ± 9.1 years for those with axial SpA. Fourteen patients with RA (17.1%) and 41 patients with axial SpA (56.2%) were male. Disease was well-controlled (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints mean ± SD 2.2 ± 1.2; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score mean ± SD 3.1 ± 2.0), but flares were frequent (22.7% of all weekly assessments). The model generated by machine learning performed well against patient-reported flares (mean sensitivity 96% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 94-97%], mean specificity 97% [95% CI 96-97%], mean positive predictive value 91% [95% CI 88-96%], and negative predictive value 99% [95% CI 98-100%]). Sensitivity analyses were confirmatory.

CONCLUSION

Although these pilot findings will have to be confirmed, the correct detection of flares by machine-learning processing of activity tracker data provides a framework for future studies of remote-control monitoring of disease activity, with great precision and minimal patient burden.

Predictive factors of tumour necrosis inhibitor treatment persistence for rheumatoid arthritis: An observational study in 8052 patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether changes in ultrasonography (US) features of monosodium urate crystal deposition is associated with the number of gouty flares after stopping gout flare prophylaxis.

METHODS

We performed a 1-year multicentre prospective study including patients with proven gout and US features of gout. The first phase of the study was a 6-month US follow-up after starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT) with gout flare prophylaxis. After 6 months of ULT, gout flare prophylaxis was stopped, followed by a clinical follow-up (M6 to 12) and ULT was maintained. Outcomes were the proportion of relapsing patients between M6 and M12 according to changes of US features of gout and determining a threshold decrease in tophus size according to the probability of relapse.

RESULTS

We included 79 gouty patients (mean [±SD] age 61.8±14 years, 91% males, median disease duration 4 [IQR 1.5; 10] years). Among the 49 completers at M12, 23 (47%) experienced relapse. Decrease in tophus size≥50% at M6 was more frequent without than with relapse (54% vs. 26%, P=0.049). On ROC curve analysis, a threshold decrease of 50.8% in tophus size had the best sensitivity/specificity ratio to predict relapse. Probability of relapse was increased for patients with a decrease in tophus size <50% between M0 and M6 (OR 3.35 [95% confidence interval 0.98; 11.44]).

CONCLUSION

A high reduction in US tophus size is associated with low probability of relapse after stopping gout prophylaxis. US follow-up may be useful for managing ULT and gout flare prophylaxis.

Correction to: Development and application of a questionnaire to assess patient beliefs in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis

The original version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access order.

2018 update of French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations about the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To update French Society for Rheumatology recommendations about the management in clinical practice of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). SpA is considered across the range of clinical phenotypes (axial, peripheral, and entheseal) and concomitant manifestations. Psoriatic arthritis is included among the SpA phenotypes.

METHODS

According to the standard procedure advocated by the EULAR for developing recommendations, we first reviewed the literature published since the previous version of the recommendations issued in June 2013. A task force used the results to develop practice guidelines, which were then revised and graded using AGREE II.

RESULTS

Four general principles and 15 recommendations were developed. The first four recommendations deal with treatment goals and general considerations (assessment tools and comorbidities). Recommendations 5 and 6 are on non-pharmacological treatments. Recommendation 7 is about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are the cornerstone of the treatment, and recommendations 8 to 10 are on analgesics, glucocorticoid therapy, and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Biologics are the focus of recommendations 11 through 14, which deal with newly introduced drug classes, including their indications (active disease despite conventional therapy and, for nonradiographic axial SpA, objective evidence of inflammation) and monitoring, and with patient management in the event of treatment failure or disease remission. Finally, recommendation 15 is about surgical treatments.

CONCLUSION

This update incorporates recent data into a smaller number of more simply formulated recommendations, with the goal of facilitating their use for guiding the management of patients with SpA.

Physical Activity Assessment Using an Activity Tracker in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Prospective Observational Study

Background

Physical activity can be tracked using mobile devices and is recommended in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) management. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends at least 150 min per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

Objective

The objectives of this study were to assess and compare physical activity and its patterns in patients with RA and axSpA using an activity tracker and to assess the feasibility of mobile devices in this population.

Methods

This multicentric prospective observational study (ActConnect) included patients who had definite RA or axSpA, and a smartphone. Physical activity was assessed over 3 months using a mobile activity tracker, recording the number of steps per minute. The number of patients reaching the WHO recommendations was calculated. RA and axSpA were compared, using linear mixed models, for number of steps, proportion of morning steps, duration of total activity, and MVPA. Physical activity trajectories were identified using the K-means method, and factors related to the low activity trajectory were explored by logistic regression. Acceptability was assessed by the mean number of days the tracker was worn over the 3 months (ie, adherence), the percentage of wearing time, and by an acceptability questionnaire.

Results

A total of 157 patients (83 RA and 74 axSpA) were analyzed; 36.3% (57/157) patients were males, and their mean age was 46 (standard deviation [SD] 12) years and mean disease duration was 11 (SD 9) years. RA and axSpA patients had similar physical activity levels of 16 (SD 11) and 15 (SD 12) min per day of MVPA (P=.80), respectively. Only 27.4% (43/157) patients reached the recommendations with a mean MVPA of 106 (SD 77) min per week. The following three trajectories were identified with constant activity: low (54.1% [85/157] of patients), moderate (42.7% [67/157] of patients), and high (3.2% [5/157] of patients) levels of MVPA. A higher body mass index was significantly related to less physical activity (odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.11-1.14). The activity trackers were worn during a mean of 79 (SD 17) days over the 90 days follow-up. Overall, patients considered the use of the tracker very acceptable, with a mean score of 8 out 10.

Conclusions

Patients with RA and axSpA performed insufficient physical activity with similar levels in both groups, despite the differences between the 2 diseases. Activity trackers allow longitudinal assessment of physical activity in these patients. The good adherence to this study and the good acceptability of wearing activity trackers confirmed the feasibility of the use of a mobile activity tracker in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Development and psychometric validation of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess fears in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: the Fear Assessment in Inflammatory Rheumatic diseases (FAIR) questionnaire

Objectives

To develop and validate an outcome measure for assessing fears in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods

Fears were identified in a qualitative study, and reformulated as assertions with which participants could rate their agreement (on a 0–10 numeric rating scale). A cross-sectional validation study was performed including patients diagnosed with RA or axSpA. Redundant items (correlation >0.65) were excluded. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) and factorial structure (principal component analysis) were assessed. Patients were classified into fear levels (cluster analysis). Associations between patient variables and fear levels were evaluated using multiple logistic regression.

Results

672 patients were included in the validation study (432 RA, 240 axSpA); most had moderate disease activity and were prescribed biologics. The final questionnaire included 10 questions with high internal consistency (α: 0.89) and a single dimension. Mean scores (±SD) were 51.2 (±25.4) in RA and 60.5 (±22.9) in axSpA. Groups of patients with high (17.2%), moderate (41.1%) and low (41.7%) fear scores were identified. High fear scores were associated with high Arthritis Helplessness Index scores (OR 6.85, 95% CI (3.95 to 11.87)); high Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety (OR 5.80, 95% CI (1.19 to 4.22)) and depression (OR 2.37, 95% CI (1.29 to 4.37)) scores; low education level (OR 3.48, 95% CI (1.37 to 8.83)); and high perceived disease activity (OR 2.36, 95% CI (1.10 to 5.04)).

Conclusions

Overall, 17.2% of patients had high fear scores, although disease was often well controlled. High fear scores were associated with psychological distress. This questionnaire could be useful both in routine practice and clinical trials.

Flares assessed weekly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis and relationship with physical activity measured using a connected activity tracker: a 3-month study

BACKGROUND

The evolution of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is marked by flares, although their frequency is unclear. Flares may impact physical activity. Activity can be assessed objectively using activity trackers. The objective was to assess longitudinally the frequency of flares and the association between flares and objective physical activity.

METHODS

This prospective observational study (ActConnect) included patients with definite clinician-confirmed RA or axSpA, owning a smartphone. During 3 months, physical activity was assessed continuously by number of steps/day, using an activity tracker, and disease flares were self-assessed weekly using a specific flare question and, if relevant, the duration of the flare. The relationship between flares and physical activity for each week (time point) was assessed by linear mixed models.

RESULTS

In all, 170/178 patients (91 patients with RA and 79 patients with axSpA; 1553 time points) were analysed: mean age was 45.5±12.4 years, mean disease duration was 10.3±8.7 years, 60 (35.3%) were men and 90 (52.9%) received biologics. The disease was well-controlled (mean Disease Activity Score 28: 2.3±1.2; mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score: 3.3±2.1). Patients self-reported flares in 28.2%±28.1% of the weekly assessments. Most flares (78.9%±31.4%) lasted ≤3 days. Persistent flares lasting more than 3 days were independently associated with less weekly physical activity (p=0.03), leading to a relative decrease of 12%-21% and an absolute decrease ranging from 836 to 1462 steps/day.

CONCLUSION

Flares were frequent but usually of short duration in these stable patients with RA and axSpA. Persistent flares were related to a moderate decrease in physical activity, confirming objectively the functional impact of patient-reported flares.

Evaluation of collected outcome measures in axial spondyloarthritis in daily-care rheumatology settings: the experience of the RHEVER network

OBJECTIVES

Nowadays, the recommended measures for optimal monitoring of axial Spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) disease activity are either BASDAI and CRP, or ASDAS-CRP. However, there could be a gap between recommendations and daily practice. We aimed to determine the measures collected by rheumatologists in an ax-SpA follow-up visit, and to determine the impact of a meeting (where rheumatologists reached a consensus on the measures to be collected) on the collection of such measures.

METHODS

A consensual meeting of a local network of 32 rheumatologists proposed, four months later, to report at least the BASDAI score in the medical file of every ax-SpA patient at every follow-up visit. An independent investigator reviewed the medical files of 10 consecutive patients per rheumatologist, seen twice during the year (e.g. before and after the meeting). The most frequently collected measures were assessed, and then, the frequency of collection before and after the meeting was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 456 medical files from 228 patients were reviewed. Treatment (>60%), CRP (51.3%) and total BASDAI (28.5%) were the most reported measures in medical files. Before/After the meeting, the frequencies of collected measures in medical files were 28.5%/51.7%, 51.3%/52.2%, 16.7%/31.6% and 0.9%/6.1% for BASDAI, CRP, BASDAI + CRP and ASDAS, respectively reaching a statistically significance for BASDAI, ASDAS and BASDAI+CRP (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a low rate of systematic report of the recommended outcome measures in ax-SpA. However, it suggests that a consensual meeting involving practicing rheumatologists might be relevant to improve the implementation of such recommendations.

Relationship between optimism and quality of life in patients with two chronic rheumatic diseases: axial spondyloarthritis and chronic low back pain: a cross sectional study of 288 patients

BACKGROUND

Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) and chronic low back pain are rheumatic diseases that impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In other chronic conditions, HRQoL was positively associated with dispositional optimism, a personality trait. The objective was to explore the relationship between optimism and HRQoL in these two diseases.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was performed in 2 tertiary care hospitals and 2 private practices in France. Patients had definite AxSpA or chronic low back pain according to the rheumatologist. A generic HRQoL questionnaire (Short Form, SF-12) with physical and mental composite scores (PCS and MCS respectively) and an optimism questionnaire (the Life Orientation Test-revised, LOT-R) were collected. Analyses included non-parametric correlations and multiple regression analyses to study the effect of optimism on PCS and MCS.

RESULTS

In all, 288 (199 AxSpA and 89 low back pain) patients were included: mean age, 47.3 ± 11.9 years, 48.6 % were males. Pain levels (0-10) were 4.5 ± 2.4 and 4.3 ± 2.4 in AxSpA and LOW BACK PAIN patients, respectively. HRQoL was similarly altered in both diseases, for both physical and mental composite scores (mean PCS: 43.7 ± 8.2 vs. 41.9 ± 7.1; mean

MCS

45.9 ± 7.8 vs. 46.7 ± 8.1 for AxSpA and low back pain respectively). Optimism was moderate and similar in both populations. Optimism was positively correlated to MCS in both diseases (rho = 0.54 and 0.58, respectively, both p <0.01) and these relations persisted in multivariate analyses (beta = 1.03 and 1.40, both p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimism was similar in these 2 chronic diseases and was an explanatory factor of the mental component of HRQoL, but not physical HRQoL. Physical HRQoL may reflect more the disease process than character traits.

Outcome of hepatitis E virus infection in patients with inflammatory arthritides treated with immunosuppressants: a French retrospective multicenter study

The clinical presentation and outcome of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in inflammatory rheumatic diseases are unknown. We aimed to investigate the severity of acute HEV infection and the risk of chronic viral replication in patients with inflammatory arthritides treated with immunosuppressive drugs. All rheumatology and internal medicine practitioners belonging to the Club Rhumatismes et Inflammation in France were sent newsletters asking for reports of HEV infection and inflammatory arthritides. Baseline characteristics of patients and the course of HEV infection were retrospectively assessed by use of a standardized questionnaire. From January 2010 to August 2013, we obtained reports of 23 cases of HEV infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 11), axial spondyloarthritis (n = 5), psoriatic arthritis (n = 4), other types of arthritides (n = 3). Patients received methotrexate (n = 16), antitumor necrosis factor α agents (n = 10), rituximab (n = 4), abatacept (n = 2), tocilizumab (n = 2), and corticosteroids (n = 10, median dose 6 mg/d, range 2-20). All had acute hepatitis: median aspartate and alanine aminotransferase levels were 679 and 1300 U/L, respectively. Eleven patients were asymptomatic, 4 had jaundice. The HEV infection diagnosis relied on positive PCR results for HEV RNA (n = 14 patients) or anti-HEV IgM positivity (n = 9). Median follow-up was 29 months (range 3-55). Treatment included discontinuation of immunosuppressants for 20 patients and ribavirin treatment for 5. Liver enzyme levels normalized and immunosuppressant therapy could be reinitiated in all patients. No chronic infection was observed. Acute HEV infection should be considered in patients with inflammatory rheumatism and elevated liver enzyme values. The outcome of HEV infection seems favorable, with no evolution to chronic hepatitis or fulminant liver failure.

Fears and beliefs in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a qualitative study

Objectives

To explore beliefs and apprehensions about disease and its treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis.

Methods

25 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 25 with spondyloarthritis participated in semi-structured interviews about their disease and its treatment. The interviews were performed by trained interviewers in participants' homes. The interviews were recorded and the main themes identified by content analysis.

Results

Patients differentiated between the underlying cause of the disease, which was most frequently identified as a hereditary or individual predisposition. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the most frequently cited triggering factor for disease onset was a psychological factor or life-event, whereas patients with spondyloarthritis tended to focus more on an intrinsic vulnerability to disease. Stress and overexertion were considered important triggering factors for exacerbations, and relaxation techniques were frequently cited strategies to manage exacerbations. The unpredictability of the disease course was a common source of anxiety. Beliefs about the disease and apprehensions about the future tended to evolve over the course of the disease, as did treatment expectations.

Conclusions

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis hold a core set of beliefs and apprehensions that reflect their level of information about their disease and are not necessarily appropriate. The physician can initiate discussion of these beliefs in order to dispel misconceptions, align treatment expectations, provide reassurance to the patient and readjust disease management. Such a dialogue would help improve standards of care in these chronic and incapacitating diseases.

Challenges of cardiovascular risk assessment in the routine rheumatology outpatient setting: an observational study of 110 rheumatoid arthritis patients

OBJECTIVE

An annual assessment of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recommended, but its practical modalities have not been determined. The objective was to assess the feasibility and usefulness of a standardized CV risk assessment in RA, performed by rheumatologists during outpatient clinics.

METHODS

We used a cross-sectional design within a network of rheumatologists. Each rheumatologist included 5 consecutive unselected patients with definite RA. Data collection included standardized assessment of CV risk factors: blood pressure, interpretation of glycemia and of lipid levels, and calculation of the Framingham CV risk score. Outcome criteria included feasibility (missing data and time taken to assess the patients) and usefulness (the CV risk assessment was considered useful if at least 1 modifiable and previously unknown CV risk factor was evidenced).

RESULTS

Twenty-two rheumatologists (77% in office-based practice) assessed 110 RA patients. The mean ± SD age was 57 ± 10 years, and the mean ± SD RA duration was 11 ± 9 years; 50 patients (45%) were treated with biologic agents, and 76% were women. Regarding feasibility, missing data were most frequent for glycemia (27% of patients) and cholesterolemia (14% of patients). The mean ± SD duration of the CV risk assessment was 15 ± 5 minutes. The CV risk assessment was considered useful in 33 patients (30%), evidencing dyslipidemia (15% of patients) or high blood pressure (9% of patients) as the most frequently previously unknown CV risk factor.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of CV risk factors is feasible, but labor intensive, during an outpatient rheumatology clinic. This assessment identified modifiable CV risk factors in 30% of the patients. These results suggest that RA patients are not sufficiently assessed and treated for CV risk factors.

Factors influencing concordance between clinical and ultrasound findings in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Clinical joint examination (CJE) is less time-consuming than ultrasound (US) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Low concordance between CJE and US would indicate that the 2 tests provide different types of information. Knowledge of factors associated with CJE/US concordance would help to select patients and joints for US. Our objective was to identify factors associated with CJE/US concordance.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with RA requiring tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonist therapy were included in a prospective, multicenter cohort. In each patient, 38 joints were evaluated. Synovitis was scored using CJE, B-mode US (B-US), and power Doppler US (PDUS). Joints whose kappa coefficient (κ) for agreement CJE/US was < 0.1 were considered discordant. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with CJE/US concordance, defined as factors yielding p < 0.05 and OR > 2.

RESULTS

Concordance before TNF-α antagonist therapy varied across joints for CJE/US (κ = -0.08 to 0.51) and B-US/PDUS (κ = 0.30 to 0.67). CJE/US concordance was low at the metatarsophalangeal joints and shoulders (κ < 0.1). Before TNF-α antagonist therapy, a low 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was associated with good CJE/B-US concordance, and no factors were associated with CJE/PDUS concordance. After TNF-α antagonist therapy, only the joint site was associated with CJE/B-US concordance; joint site and short disease duration were associated with CJE/PDUS concordance.

CONCLUSION

Concordance between CJE and US is poor overall. US adds information to CJE, most notably at the metatarsophalangeal joints and shoulders. Usefulness is decreased for B-US when DAS28 is low and for PDUS when disease duration is short.

Maintenance of infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a one-year randomized controlled trial comparing systematic versus on-demand treatment

OBJECTIVE

Continuous treatment with the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) antibody infliximab is efficacious in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), whereas treatment discontinuation results in disease relapse, with variable delay. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of continuous treatment with infliximab with that of a treatment regimen adapted to symptom recurrence. Methotrexate (MTX) in combination with infliximab was also tested.

METHODS

Patients with active AS were randomly assigned at week 0 to receive infliximab every 6 weeks (continuous treatment) or upon symptom recurrence (on-demand treatment), following infusions at weeks 4, 6, and 10. Patients in the on-demand group were randomly assigned to receive either MTX in combination with infliximab or infliximab alone. Patients were monitored for 1 year. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who met the ASsessment in AS International Working Group criteria for 20% improvement (ASAS20) at week 58.

RESULTS

Of 247 patients, 124 were assigned to receive infliximab every 6 weeks and 123 to receive on-demand treatment. Among the latter, 62 received MTX, and 61 received infliximab alone. A greater proportion of patients receiving infliximab every 6 weeks fulfilled ASAS20 response criteria at week 58 than did patients receiving on-demand treatment (75% versus 46%; P<0.0001). Patients in the continuous treatment group received more infliximab infusions after week 10 than did those in the on-demand group (mean+/-SD 5.8+/-2.2 versus 3.5+/-2; P<0.0001). Addition of MTX did not significantly affect the proportion of patients with an ASAS20 response at week 58, nor the number of infliximab infusions administered.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that continuous treatment of AS with infliximab is more efficacious than on-demand treatment, and that the addition of MTX to infliximab provides no significant benefit.

Professional practice assessment in ambulatory private rheumatology: a pilot evaluation of the medical file content for rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Professional Practice Assessment (PPA) has become an obligation for all physicians in France, however its modalities remain unclear. The objective of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a PPA for private practice rheumatologists performed in the context of a network.

METHODS

A list of items considered mandatory to collect during an outpatient visit for rheumatoid arthritis, was prepared by the network. Non hospital-based rheumatologists, members of the network then evaluated some of their patient files selected by chronological order over a one-month period of time using this list. These files were then assessed by another private rheumatologist, member of the group, randomly allocated, using the same list of items.

RESULTS

Eighty percent of the private-practice doctors accepted to participate. The mean time to evaluate 15 patient files was 2 hours. Agreement between auto-evaluation and external evaluation for each file was good (agreement statistic, 0.75-1.0). Items mandatory to collect were collected in a high proportion of cases (84.6%).

CONCLUSION

PPA can be performed in the context of a network, auto-evaluation is a valid method and when the list of items is decided on by the network, the data are collected satisfactorily.

Ophthalmic findings and frequency of extraocular manifestations in patients with HLA-B27 uveitis*1A study of 175 cases

OBJECTIVE

To analyze ocular and extraocular manifestations in patients with HLA-B27-associated uveitis.

DESIGN

Large, observational case series.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred seventy-five consecutive patients with HLA-B27-associated uveitis seen in a single center between January 1996 and March 2001.

METHODS

Features of uveitis were noted and patients were referred systematically to rheumatologists. The history of previous uveitis attacks and extraocular manifestations of spondyloarthropathy was recorded. Assessments of spondyloarthropathies were based on criteria established by the European Spondyloarthropathy Study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of patients with extraocular manifestations. The time between the first episode of uveitis and symptoms or diagnosis of extraocular disease was estimated. Characteristics of uveitis were analyzed.

RESULTS

The male-to-female ratio was 1.3 to 1, and the median age at the time of the first attack of uveitis was 31 years. An HLA-B27-associated extraocular disorder was seen in 136 cases (77.7%). Of these, ankylosing spondylitis was diagnosed in 81 patients (46.3%) and presumed in 17 (9.7%). Undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy was observed in 21 patients (12%) and other HLA-B27-associated diseases in 17 patients (9.7%). The onset of extraocular symptoms occurred at a younger age (mean+/-standard deviation [SD], 26.4+/-11.1 years) than the first attack of uveitis (mean+/-SD, 34.0+/-14.1 years; P<0.0001). The diagnosis of an extraocular disease was made only after the appearance of ophthalmic manifestations in 88 of 136 patients. Among 117 patients (66.9%) with more than 1 episode of uveitis, same eye attacks were observed in 48 of 117 patients (41.0%), more than the expected percentage than attacks of a random eye (P<0.0001). The median +/- SD frequency of active episodes of uveitis was 0.8+/-0.6 per year and decreased as the duration of the disease lengthened (P<0.0001). Patients with extraocular disease had a greater total number of attacks of uveitis (P = 0.02), but other ophthalmic findings did not differ between patients with and without an extraocular disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Uveitis is frequently the first indication of a previously undiagnosed HLA-B27-associated extraocular disease. The most common of these diseases are spondyloarthropathies.

Laterally elevated wedged insoles in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. A two-year prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effects of laterally wedged insoles and neutrally wedged insoles (used as control) in patients with medial femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis.

STUDY DESIGN

24-month prospective randomized controlled study.

PATIENTS

Outpatients with painful medial femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient's overall assessment of disease activity (5 grade scale), WOMAC index subscales and concomitant treatments.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Performed as an intention-to-treat analysis, with the last observation carried forward (LOCF). Main symptomatic criterion: Improvement in the patient's assessment of activity (defined as a reduction of one grade or more at the end of the study as compared to baseline, and no intra-articular injection or lavage during the 6 months previous to the last visit). Secondary criteria for assessment: (a) Changes in the WOMAC subscales at month 24, and (b) concomitant therapies (analgesics, NSAIDs and intra-articular injections or lavages). Structural criterion: Joint space width (JSW) at the narrowest point. Non-compliance was defined as intermittent or lack of insole fitting at two consecutive visits. Compliance within groups was compared by using a life table analysis technique (Log-Rank).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the 156 recruited patients (41 males, 115 females, mean age 64.8 years) were not different in the 2 treatment groups. At year 2, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups concerning the percentages of patients with improvement in both global assessment of disease activity and in WOMAC subscales (pain, stiffness, function). The number of days with NSAIDs intake was lower in the group with laterally wedged insoles than in the neutrally wedged group (71+/-173 days vs. 127+/-193 days, P=0.003, Mann-Whitney test). The mean joint space narrowing rate did not differ between the two groups: 0.21+/-0.59 mm/year in the laterally wedged group vs 0.12+/-0.32 mm/year in the neutrally wedged group. Compliance and tolerance were satisfactory. Compliance was different between the 2 groups at month 24, with a greater frequency of patients who wore insoles permanently in the laterally wedged insole group than in the other group (85.8% vs 71.9%, P=0.023).

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate a relevant symptomatic and/or structural effect of laterally-wedged insoles in medial femoro-tibial OA. However, the reduced NSAIDs intake and the better compliance in the treatment group are in favor of a beneficial effect of laterally-wedged insoles in medial femoro-tibial OA.

Rapid diagnosis of inflammatory synovial fluid with reagent strips

OBJECTIVE

To determine the usefulness of reagent test strips for screening inflammatory synovial fluid (SF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic arthrocentesis, attending the Department of Rheumatology of a large tertiary care hospital were evaluated. All SF specimens obtained were tested using two techniques: (i) white blood cell (WBC) count with the differential according to standard practice (which is considered the gold standard) (an inflammatory SF was defined as a WBC count > or =2000 cells/mm3); and (ii) reagent strips used to test urine (Multistix 8 SG, Bayer Diagnostics) for the presence of leucocytes (a positive test was defined as a strip showing more than a trace for leucocytes). Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratio (LR) of the reagent strip in diagnosing inflammatory SF were determined.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eight samples of SF were tested. The results of using the reagent strip were: sensitivity 76.9% (95% CI, 66.0-85.7%), specificity 86.9% (95% CI, 79.9-92.2%); positive LR, 5.88 (95% CI, 3.71-9.31) and negative LR, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.18-0.40). In 13 of the 19 false negative results, the differential cell count showed a predominance (> or =50%) of lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that, in daily practice, the evaluation of SF by reagent strips could be of use to discriminate between inflammatory and non-inflammatory SF.

Laterally elevated wedged insoles in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effects of laterally wedged insoles and neutrally wedged insoles (used as control) in patients with medial femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

6-month prospective randomized controlled study.

PATIENTS

outpatients with painful medial femoro-tibial knee OA.

OUTCOME MEASURES

patient's overall assessment of disease activity (5 grade scale), WOMAC index subscales and concomitant treatments.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Performed as an intention-to-treat analysis. Main criterion: improvement in the patient's assessment of activity (defined as a reduction of 1 grade or more at month 6 compared to baseline, and no intraarticular injection or lavage during the study). Secondary criteria for assessment: (a) improvement in the patient's assessment of activity at months 1 and 3 compared to baseline, (b) improvement in the WOMAC subscales at months 1, 3 and 6, compared to baseline (defined as an improvement of at least 30%, and no intraarticular injection or lavage during the study) and (c) concomitant therapies (analgesics and NSAIDs).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the 156 recruited patients (41 males, 115 females, mean age 64.8 years) were not different in the two treatment groups. At months 1, 3 and 6 the percentages of patients with improvement in assessment of disease activity, in WOMAC pain, joint stiffness, and physical functioning subscales were similar in the two groups. The number of days with NSAIDs intake during the previous 3 months was decreased at month 6 compared with baseline in the group furnished with laterally wedged insoles (14.1 days+/-28 vs 9.9 days+/-27, P=0.04, Wilcoxon paired test), while it remained unchanged in the other group (15.5 days+/-24 vs 15+/-28, P=0.56). Compliance and tolerance were satisfactory. Compliance was different between the two groups at month 6, with a greater frequency of patients who wore insoles permanently in the laterally wedged insole group than in the other group (87.8% vs 74.3%;P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate a relevant short-term symptomatic effect of laterally-wedged insoles in medial femoro-tibial OA. However, the decrease in NSAIDs consumption together with better compliance in the treated group are in favor of a beneficial effect of laterally-wedged insoles in medial femoro-tibial OA.