1
|
McNitt-Gray M, Napel S, Jaggi A, Mattonen SA, Hadjiiski L, Muzi M, Goldgof D, Balagurunathan Y, Pierce LA, Kinahan PE, Jones EF, Nguyen A, Virkud A, Chan HP, Emaminejad N, Wahi-Anwar M, Daly M, Abdalah M, Yang H, Lu L, Lv W, Rahmim A, Gastounioti A, Pati S, Bakas S, Kontos D, Zhao B, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K. Standardization in Quantitative Imaging: A Multicenter Comparison of Radiomic Features from Different Software Packages on Digital Reference Objects and Patient Data Sets. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:118-128. [PMID: 32548288 PMCID: PMC7289262 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiomic features are being increasingly studied for clinical applications. We aimed to assess the agreement among radiomic features when computed by several groups by using different software packages under very tightly controlled conditions, which included standardized feature definitions and common image data sets. Ten sites (9 from the NCI's Quantitative Imaging Network] positron emission tomography–computed tomography working group plus one site from outside that group) participated in this project. Nine common quantitative imaging features were selected for comparison including features that describe morphology, intensity, shape, and texture. The common image data sets were: three 3D digital reference objects (DROs) and 10 patient image scans from the Lung Image Database Consortium data set using a specific lesion in each scan. Each object (DRO or lesion) was accompanied by an already-defined volume of interest, from which the features were calculated. Feature values for each object (DRO or lesion) were reported. The coefficient of variation (CV), expressed as a percentage, was calculated across software packages for each feature on each object. Thirteen sets of results were obtained for the DROs and patient data sets. Five of the 9 features showed excellent agreement with CV < 1%; 1 feature had moderate agreement (CV < 10%), and 3 features had larger variations (CV ≥ 10%) even after attempts at harmonization of feature calculations. This work highlights the value of feature definition standardization as well as the need to further clarify definitions for some features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M McNitt-Gray
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - S Napel
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - A Jaggi
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - S A Mattonen
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.,The University of Western Ontario, Canada
| | | | - M Muzi
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - D Goldgof
- University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | | | - E F Jones
- UC San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - A Nguyen
- UC San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - A Virkud
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - H P Chan
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - N Emaminejad
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Wahi-Anwar
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Daly
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Abdalah
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - H Yang
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - L Lu
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - W Lv
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - A Rahmim
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - A Gastounioti
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - D Kontos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - B Zhao
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wood M, Seisler DK, Hsieh MK, Kontos D, Ambaye A, Le-Petross H, Jung SH, Liu H, Zekan P, Cardinal L, Charlamb J, Wang LX, Unzeitig GW, Garber J, Marshall J. Abstract P5-12-03: Withdrawn. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p5-12-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Wood
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - DK Seisler
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - M-K Hsieh
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - D Kontos
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - A Ambaye
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - H Le-Petross
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - S-H Jung
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - H Liu
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - P Zekan
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - L Cardinal
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - J Charlamb
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - LX Wang
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - GW Unzeitig
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - J Garber
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - J Marshall
- University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC; Queens Cancer Center, Queens Hospital, Jamaica, NY; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Bay Area Tumor Institute NCORP, Oakland, CA; Doctor's Hospital of Laredo, Laredo, TX; Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wood ME, Sprague BL, Oustimov A, Synnstvedt MB, Cuke M, Emily CF, Kontos D. Abstract PD1-05: Aspirin use is associated with lower mammographic density in a large screening cohort. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-pd1-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Current breast cancer prevention agents have substantial side effects and do not prevent estrogen receptor negative (ER-) breast cancer. Aspirin is a promising breast cancer prevention therapy; it is cheap, safe, well tolerated, with strong biologic and epidemiologic evidence for a prevention effect on both ER- and ER+ breast cancers. However, clinical trials to date have failed to corroborate a prevention effect; these results are potentially related to study design (dose, duration of therapy and followup, population treated). We sought to evaluate the effect of aspirin on mammographic density, as breast density is a well-accepted, modifiable risk factor for both estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and ER- breast cancer. Methods: Electronic medical records from the University of Pennsylvania were retrospectively evaluated for women from a core set of 36 primary care/ObGyn practices. Individuals were selected if they had both undergone routine screening mammography during 2012-2013 and had an ambulatory visit within the year prior with a confirmed list of medication use. We selected the medication record closest to the screening exam. Logistic regression was performed to test for associations between clinically-recorded BIRADS breast density and aspirin use, after adjusting for the additional risk factors of age, body mass index (BMI) and ethnicity. Results: We identified 26000 women who fit the above criteria, of whom 19.7% reported current aspirin use and 41% were African American. Mean age was 57.3 (standard deviation [sd], 10.9) and mean BMI was 28.9 (sd, 7.3) kg/m2 for the entire cohort. Aspirin users were significantly older and had higher BMI (see Table). There was an independent, inverse association between aspirin use and mammographic density (Ptrend<0.001). Compared to women with extremely dense breasts, women with fatty (OR=1.73, CI: 1.33-2.25) or scattered fibroglandular (OR=1.50; CI: 1.17-1.92) breasts were more likely to be aspirin users. A dose-response pattern was observed, as there was a lower likelihood of having extremely or heterogeneously dense breasts with increasing aspirin dose (OR=0.62, CI: 0.50-0.76 for >300 mg; OR=0.84, CI=0.77-0.91 for <=300 mg; compared to non-users as reference group). The association between aspirin use and density was more pronounced for women <60 and for African American women (p=0.01). Conclusion: We demonstrate an independent association between aspirin use and lower mammographic density in a large, diverse screening cohort. Our results suggest that this association is stronger for younger and African American women: two groups at greater risk for ER- breast cancer. Future evaluation of this cohort will examine duration of aspirin use, and evaluate an automated measure of breast density. These results and others highlight the potential value and need for a randomized, controlled trial of aspirin as a preventive agent for breast cancer.
CharacteristicAspirin Non-UsersAspirin UsersPAge, mean (SD)55.3 (10.2)65.3 (9.8)<0.0001BMI, mean (SD)28.5 (7.2)30.4 (7.6)<0.0001Breast density, no. (%) OR (95% CI)BIRADS 12006 (9.6)861 (16.9)1.73 (1.33 - 2.25)BIRADS 29346 (44.7)2859 (55.9)1.50 (1.17 - 1.92)BIRADS 38480 (40.6)1312 (25.7)1.22 (0.95 - 1.56)BIRADS 41057 (5.1)79 (1.6)1.00 (Reference)
Citation Format: Wood ME, Sprague BL, Oustimov A, Synnstvedt MB, Cuke M, Emily CF, Kontos D. Aspirin use is associated with lower mammographic density in a large screening cohort. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ME Wood
- University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - BL Sprague
- University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - A Oustimov
- University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - MB Synnstvedt
- University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - M Cuke
- University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - CF Emily
- University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - D Kontos
- University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|