Managing hematological cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO-EHA Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has created enormous challenges for the clinical management of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), raising questions about the optimal care of this patient group.

METHODS

This consensus manuscript aims at discussing clinical evidence and providing expert advice on statements related to the management of HMs in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an international consortium was established including a steering committee, which prepared six working packages addressing significant clinical questions from the COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation strategies to specific HMs management in the pandemic. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Hematology Association, statements were discussed and voted upon. When a consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements to develop consensual clinical guidance.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The expert panel agreed on 33 statements, reflecting a consensus, which will guide clinical decision making for patients with hematological neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sacubitril-valsartan improves radial and longitudinal strain and ejection fraction in C57Bl/6 mice treated with doxorubicin through NLRP3 mediated pathways and reduction of cytokine storm

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): Ricerca Corrente grant, Ministero della Salute (it)

Background

Doxorubicin-mediated adverse cardiovascular events are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in breast cancer patients. Sacubitril-valsartan (LCZ 696) is a combination drug, made up of neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan, used for the treatment of heart failure in patients with a reduced ejection fraction.

Hypothesis

we hypothesized that LCZ 696, administered during doxorubicin, could improve cardiac functions in preclinical models

Methods

 C57Bl/6 mice were untreated (Sham, n = 6) or treated for 10 days with doxorubicin i.p at 2.17 mg/kg (DOXO, n = 6), LCZ-696 at 60 mg/kg (LCZ, n = 6) or doxorubicin combined to LCZ-696 (DOXO-LCZ, n = 6). Before and after treatments, ejection fraction (EF) and radial and longitudinal strain were analyzed through transthoracic echocardiography (Vevo 2100). After treatment, mice were sacrificed and cardiac tissues were treated for determination of NLRP3 inflammasome, Myd88, NF-kB and cytokines involved in heart failure and arrhythmias (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL17-α, IL-18, IFN-γ, TNF-α, G-CSF, and GM-CSF).

Results

LCZ 696 improved significantly the EF and prevented the reduction of radial and longitudinal strain after 10 days of treatment with doxorubicin. No significant differences were observed for IVS;d-D, LVID;d-D, LVPW;d-D, LV Mass, LV Vol; d, LV Vol;s between the experimental groups.  A reduced expression of NLRP3, MyD88 and NF-kB in cardiac tissues was seen in DOXO-LCZ group compared to DOXO mice (p < 0.001). Cardiac expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, G-CSF and GM-CSF were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) after treatment with LCZ-696 indicating anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective properties.

Conclusion

LCZ-696 improves cardiac functions in mice treated with doxorubicin. Biochemically, these effects are mediated by the downregulation of NLRP3 inflammasome-related pathways and cytokines involved in doxorubicin-mediated heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Ipilimumab and Nivolumab exertes cardiotoxic and pro-fibrotic effects in mice through the overexpression of NLRP3 inflammasome, chemokines and leukotrienes

Background

Several strategies based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been developed for cancer therapy, opening to advantages in cancer outcomes. However, several ICIs-induced side effects emerged in these patients, especially a rare but clinically significant cardiotoxicity with high rate of mortality.

Purpose

We studied cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory properties of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in cellular and preclinical models

Methods

Co-cultures of human cardiomyocytes and hPBMCs were exposed to Ipilimumab or Nivolumab at 100 nM; cell viability and expression of leukotrienes, NLRP3 inflammasome, MyD88 (myddosome) and p65/NF-kB were performed. C57 mice were untreated (Sham; n=6) or treated with Ipilimumab (IPI, n=6) (15 mg/kg); analysis of fractional shortening, ejection fraction, radial and longitudinal strain were made before and after treatments through 2D-echocardiography (Vevo 2100). Expression of NLRP3, MyD88, p65/NF-kB, leukotrienes and 12 cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL17-α, IFN-γ, TNF-α, G-CSF, and GM-CSF) have been analyzed in murine myocardium.

Results

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab induced cell death and apoptosis in cardiomyocutes. Both ICIs increased NLRP3, MyD88 and p65/NF-kB expression compared to untreated cells, however the most pro-inflammatory and cardiotoxic effects were seen after exposure to Ipilimumab. Mice treated with Ipilimumab showed a significant decrease of fractional shortening and radial strain compared to untreated mice. Metabolic studies clearly indicates that ipilimumab increases leukotrienes production and NLRP3 expression in heart tissues, probably due to increased iROS content (iROS are key inductors of leukotrienes expression). High expression of IL-6, IL-1 and IL-17 were also seein in mice treated with ipilimumab (p<0,001).

Conclusions

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab exert cytotoxic effects mediated by NLRP3 inflammasome, leukotrienes and pro-inflammatory cytokines in heart tissues.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Ministero della Salute, Ricerca Corrente Project

The combination of a neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril) and angiotensin-II receptor blocker (valsartan) improves ejection fraction and longitudinal strain in mice treated with doxorubicin through NLRP3

Background

Doxorubicin-mediated- adverse cardiovascular events are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in breast cancer patients. Sacubitril-valsartan (LCZ 696) is a combination drug, made up of neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan, used for the treatment of heart failure in patients with a reduced ejection fraction.

Purpose

Here, we aim to assess whether LCZ 696, administered during doxorubicin, reduces in vitro anticancer drugs-related cardiotoxicity compared to Valsartan (V), used as a control drug.

Methods

Human fetal cardiomyocytes (HFC cell line) were exposed to subclinical concentration of doxorubicin (at 200 nM) alone or in combination with LCZ-696 (100 mM) for 72 h. After the incubation period, we performed the following tests: determination of cell viability, through analysis of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity, study of lipid peroxidation (quantifying cellular Malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal), intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. Moreover, pro-inflammatory studied were also performed (activation of NLRP3 inflammasome; expression of TLR4/MyD88; mTORC1 Fox01/3a; transcriptional activation of p65/NF-κB and secretion of cytokines involved in cardiotoxicity (Interleukins 1β, 8, 6). C57Bl/6 mice were untreated (Sham, n=6) or treated for 10 days with doxorubicin (DOXO, n=6), LCZ-696 (LCZ, n=6) or doxorubicin combined to LCZ-696 (DOXO-LCZ, n=6). DOXO was injected intraperitoneally. Ejection fraction, radial and longitudinal strain were analyzed through transthoracic echocardiography (Vevo 2100). Cardiac tissue expression of NLRP3 inflammasome, Myd8, NF-kB and chemokines and cytokines were quantified after treatments through ELISA method.

Results

LCZ 696 co-incubated with doxorubicin exerts cardioprotective effects, enhancing cell viability of 48–54.6% compared to only doxorubicin-treated cells (p<0,001 for all); LCZ 696 reduced significantly the cardiotoxicity through MyD88/NF-KB/cytokines axis and mTORC1 Fox01/3α mediated mechanisms. In preclinical study, LCZ 696 improved significantly the EF and prevented the reduction of radial and longitudinal strain after 10 days of treatment with doxorubicin. A reduced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, NLRP3, MyD88 and NF-kB in heart tissues was also seen in DOXO-LCZ group compared to DOXO mice (p<0.001)

Conclusion

We demonstrated, for the first time, that the LCZ696 exerts direct effects in cardiomyocytes and preclinical models during doxorubicin exposure, turning on a new light on its possible use in cancer patients to reduce cardiovascular side effects.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Ministero della Salute, Ricerca Corrente project

Folic acid supplementation in postmenopausal women with hot flushes: phase III randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether folic acid supplementation ameliorates hot flushes.

DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial.

SETTING

Nine hospitals in England.

POPULATION

Postmenopausal women experiencing ≥50 hot flushes weekly.

METHODS

Women (n = 164) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive folic acid 5 mg tablet or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Participants recorded frequency and severity of hot flushes in a Sloan Diary daily and completed Greene Climacteric and Utian Quality of Life (UQoL) Scales at 4-week intervals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The change in daily Hot Flush Score at week 12 from randomisation based on Sloan Diary Composite Score B calculation.

RESULTS

Data of 143 (87%) women were available for the primary outcome. The mean change (SD) in Hot Flush Score at week 12 was -6.98 (10.30) and -4.57 (9.46) for folic acid and placebo group, respectively. The difference between groups in the mean change was -2.41 (95% CI -5.68 to 0.87) (P = 0.149) and in the adjusted mean change -2.61 (95% CI -5.72 to 0.49) (P = 0.098). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated an increased benefit in the folic acid group regarding changes in total and emotional UQoL scores at week 8 when compared with placebo. The difference in the mean change from baseline was 5.22 (95% CI 1.16-9.28) and 1.88 (95% CI 0.23-3.52) for total and emotional score, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The study was not able to demonstrate that folic acid had a statistically significant greater benefit in reducing Hot Flush Score over 12 weeks in postmenopausal women when compared with placebo.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Folic acid may ameliorate hot flushes in postmenopausal women but confirmation is required from a larger study.

Strategies to Improve Recruitment to a De-escalation Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study of the OPTIMA Prelim Trial in Early Breast Cancer

AIMS

De-escalation trials are challenging and sometimes may fail due to poor recruitment. The OPTIMA Prelim randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN42400492) randomised patients with early stage breast cancer to chemotherapy versus 'test-directed' chemotherapy, with a possible outcome of no chemotherapy, which could confer less treatment relative to routine practice. Despite encountering challenges, OPTIMA Prelim reached its recruitment target ahead of schedule. This study reports the root causes of recruitment challenges and the strategies used to successfully overcome them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mixed-methods recruitment intervention (QuinteT Recruitment Intervention) was used to investigate the recruitment difficulties and feedback findings to inform interventions and optimise ongoing recruitment. Quantitative site-level recruitment data, audio-recorded recruitment appointments (n = 46), qualitative interviews (n = 22) with trialists/recruiting staff (oncologists/nurses) and patient-facing documentation were analysed using descriptive, thematic and conversation analyses. Findings were triangulated to inform a 'plan of action' to optimise recruitment.

RESULTS

Despite best intentions, oncologists' routine practices complicated recruitment. Discomfort about deviating from the usual practice of recommending chemotherapy according to tumour clinicopathological features meant that not all eligible patients were approached. Audio-recorded recruitment appointments revealed how routine practices undermined recruitment. A tendency to justify chemotherapy provision before presenting the randomised controlled trial and subtly indicating that chemotherapy would be more/less beneficial undermined equipoise and made it difficult for patients to engage with OPTIMA Prelim. To tackle these challenges, individual and group recruiter feedback focussed on communication issues and vignettes of eligible patients were discussed to address discomforts around approaching patients. 'Tips' documents concerning structuring discussions and conveying equipoise were disseminated across sites, together with revisions to the Patient Information Sheet.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study illuminating the tension between oncologists' routine practices and recruitment to de-escalation trials. Although time and resources are required, these challenges can be addressed through specific feedback and training as the trial is underway.

European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia

The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has profoundly changed over the past 7 years. Most patients with chronic phase (CP) now have a normal life expectancy. Another goal is achieving a stable deep molecular response (DMR) and discontinuing medication for treatment-free remission (TFR). The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically evaluate and update the evidence to achieve these goals since its previous recommendations. First-line treatment is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; imatinib brand or generic, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib are available first-line). Generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment in CP. Various contraindications and side-effects of all TKIs should be considered. Patient risk status at diagnosis should be assessed with the new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS)-score. Monitoring of response should be done by quantitative polymerase chain reaction whenever possible. A change of treatment is recommended when intolerance cannot be ameliorated or when molecular milestones are not reached. Greater than 10% BCR-ABL1 at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed. Allogeneic transplantation continues to be a therapeutic option particularly for advanced phase CML. TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy. Treatment discontinuation may be considered in patients with durable DMR with the goal of achieving TFR.

P3110Tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib increases atherosclerosis burden in ApoE knock-out mice

Background

In 2001, imatinib, the 1st generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), dramatically improved the treatment and survival of the patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, the emergence of imatinib-resistant patients led to the development of 2nd generation TKIs. Nilotinib demonstrated increased efficacy to control CML disease over imatinib and is now recommended as first-line therapy. But arterial occlusive adverse events (AOE) occurs in patients treated with nilotinib and not with imatinib. Mechanisms leading to AOE with nilotinib is not well understood. AOE are dominated by ischemic heart disease and lower extremity arterial disease. Moreover, we demonstrated that CML patients with cardiovascular risk factors are at high risk to rapidly develop AOE with nilotinib.

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of nilotinib in a pre-clinical model of atherosclerosis.

Methods

ApoE Knock-Out mice (8-week-old) were treated with either placebo (N=10), imatinib (IMA) 200mg/kg/day (N=10) or nilotinib (NILO) 100mg/kg/day (N=10) by daily feeding and a high-fat diet for 12 weeks. Heart and aorta were harvested after sacrifice, for histology staining and immunochemistry. Splenocytes were cultured from collected spleens, and Interleukin (IL) 12p70 and IL10 measured by ELISA.

Results

Mice treated with nilotinib showed an increase of atherosclerotic plaque size at the aortic sinus level: 462.1x103 μm2 vs. 344.4x103 μm2 with imatinib or 394.9x103 μm2 with placebo (p<0.05) and at the thoracoabdominal aorta level (p<0.05). Plaques had greater infiltration of macrophages: 33.0±3.4% with nilotinib vs. 7.3±1.3% with imatinib and 12.6±1.1% with placebo (p<0.001) and a larger necrotic nucleus 33.0±3.4% with nilotinib vs. 7.3±1.3% with imatinib or 12.6±1.1% with placebo (p<0.001). Nilotinib modulated the systemic immune response by increasing IL-12p70 and by decreasing IL-10 production by splenocytes after stimulation by LPS-IFNγ whereas IL10 increase was observed with imatinib.

Plaque size (aortic sinus)

Conclusion

Nilotinib has a pro-atherogenic effect in a pre-clinical model of atherosclerosis and increases the monocyte/macrophage pro-inflammatory response. Further experiments are required to identify pathways activated by nilotinib.

P5716Cardioprotective anti inflammatory effects of empaglifozin in doxorubicin induced cardiotoxicity: the role of leukotriene B4 and interleukin 1

Background

Empagliflozin (EMPA), a selective inhibitor of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), reduces the risk of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death in type 2 diabetic patients.

Purpose

We studied the putative cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of EMPA in Doxorubicin (DOXO)-Induced cardiotoxicity.

Methods

For this purpose, we tested the effects of EMPA (at 100 or 500 nM) alone or in combination with DOXO (20 μM) in HL-1 adult cardiomyocytes evaluating: mitochondrial viability, lipid peroxidation (quantifying cellular Malondialdehyde [MDA] and 4-hydroxynonenal [4-HNA]), Leukotriene-B4 expression, p65-NF-κB activation and Interleukin 1β, 8 and 6 secretion. Preclinical studies were also performed in C57BL6 mice, dividing them in 4 groups (n=6): Sham (untreated mice), EMPA (mice treated with EMPA at 10 mg/kg/day, administrated orally for 7 days); DOXO (mice treated with DOXO at 2.25 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneally administered for 7 days); EMPA-DOXO (pre-treatment with EMPA for 3 days and 7 days of co-administration EMPA and DOXO). As predictor of cardiotoxicity, the Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) was measured using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography. Cardiac lysates were processed for analysis of pro-inflammatory interleukins.

Results

We demonstrated that EMPA, co-incubated with DOXO, increases cardiomyocyte viability of 33,6 and 82% at 100 and 500 nM, respectively (compared to only DOXO treated cells). EMPA inhibits the lipid peroxidation by decreasing MDA and 4-HNA production of around 23,6 and 28,7%, at 100 nM and of 47,8 and 52,1% at 500 nM, respectively, compared to untreated cells (p<0,01 for all). Moreover, EMPA has anti-inflammatory activity reducing the Leukotriene B4 and p65-NFkb expression of 37,4% and 31% at 100 nM and of 58,4 and 64,3% at 500 nM, respectively (all compared to only DOXO treated cells). EMPA also decreased the expression of Interleukin 1β (of 28,5 and 68,8%), Interleukin-8 (of 21,2 and 57,3%) and Interleukin-6 (of 28,1 and 49,8%) at 100 and 500 nM, respectively, compared to only DOXO exposed cells (p<0,05 for all). In our in vivo studies, after 7 days with DOXO, the GLS decreased. Interestingly, in mice treated with EMPA/DOXO, we observed that EMPA prevents the GLS's reduction: GLS was −19.24±1.5 (p<0,01) vs DOXO alone, indicating cardioprotective effects. In DOXO-EMPA groups the cardiac IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 were reduced of 48, 54,4 and 58%, compared to only DOXO group (p<0,001 for all).

Conclusion

EMPA has strong anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects in DOXO-Induced cardiotoxicity and these effects are mainly mediated by a reduction of the lipid peroxidation, Leukotriene-B4 and NF-κB activation bringing to a strong inhibition of the Interleukin 1β, 8 and 6 production.

P1537Cardiotoxicity induced by the combinatorial treatment based on the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab associated to trastuzumab

Background

The immunotherapy has revolutionized the world of oncology in the last decades with considerable advantages in terms of overall survival in cancer patients. A combination therapy based on the co-administration of Pembrolizumab (an antibody against PD-1) and Trastuzumab (the humanized anti-Her2 mAb) was recently proposed in clinical trials for the treatment of Trastuzumab-resistant advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Although immunotherapies are frequently associated with a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events, the cardiac toxicity has not been properly studied.

Purpose

We studied, for the first time, the putative cardiotoxic effects of Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab turning the light on the pro-inflammatory effects of this novel combined therapy

Methods

Cell viability, intracellular calcium quantification and pro-inflammatory assays (analyzing the production of Interleukin 1β, 6 and 8 as well as the expression of p65/NFkB and Leukotriene B4) were performed in human fetal cardiomyocytes in vitro. Preclinical studies were also performed in vivo on C57BL6 mice untreated (Sham) or treated with Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab alone or in combination by analyzing (in cardiac tissue extracts) the same markers of inflammation used in cellular studies.

Results

Combination therapy leads to an increase of the intracellular calcium overload (more than 3 times compared to untreated cells) and to a reduction of the cardiomyocytes viability (of more than 65 and 20–25%, compared to untreated and Pembrolizumab or Trastuzumab treated cells, respectively) thus indicating cardiotoxic effects. Notably, combination therapy increases the inflammation of cardiomyocytes enhancing significantly the production of p65/NFkB and Interleukins. Moreover, in in vivo studies on mice, the association of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab shows pro-inflammatory effects in cardiac tissue by stimulating the Interleukin 1β, 8 and 6 expression of 40–50% more than the single treatments; the expression of p65/NFkB and Leukotriene B4 was also increased indicating pro-inflammatory effects.

Conclusion

Combination therapy based on Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab leads to significant cardiac pro-inflammatory effects mediated by overexpression of NFkB/p65 and Leukotriene B4 related pathways

Cardiotoxicity and pro-inflammatory effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab

BACKGROUND

The immunotherapy has revolutionized the world of oncology in the last decades with considerable advantages in terms of overall survival in cancer patients. The association of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab was recently proposed in clinical trials for the treatment of Trastuzumab-resistant advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Although immunotherapies are frequently associated with a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events, the cardiac toxicity has not been properly studied.

PURPOSE

We studied, for the first time, the putative cardiotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects of Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab.

METHODS

Cell viability, intracellular calcium quantification and pro-inflammatory studies (analyses of the production of Interleukin 1β, 6 and 8, the expression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4) were performed in human fetal cardiomyocytes. Preclinical studies were also performed in C57BL6 mice by analyzing fibrosis and inflammation in heart tissues.

RESULTS

The combination of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab leads to an increase of the intracellular calcium overload (of 3 times compared to untreated cells) and to a reduction of the cardiomyocytes viability (of 65 and 20-25%, compared to untreated and Pembrolizumab or Trastuzumab treated cells, respectively) indicating cardiotoxic effects. Notably, combination therapy increases the inflammation of cardiomyocytes by enhancing the expression of NF-kB and Interleukins. Moreover, in preclinical models, the association of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab increases the Interleukins expression of 40-50% compared to the single treatments; the expression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4 was also increased.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab leads to strong cardiac pro-inflammatory effects mediated by overexpression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4 related pathways.

Effects of transdermal flunixin meglumine on experimentally induced lameness in adult dairy cattle

Lameness is a common animal health condition with significant production and welfare implications. The transdermal formulation of flunixin meglumine is the only approved drug for pain control in cattle in the United States. Thirty adult dairy cows were enrolled in a study to determine the effect of transdermal flunixin on cattle with induced lameness. Cows were allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups, with 10 cows per group: lameness and flunixin (L+F), lameness and placebo (L+P), or sham induction and placebo (S+P). An arthritis-synovitis was induced in the distal interphalangeal joint of the left hind lateral digit, using 20 mg of amphotericin B, 6 h before the application of treatment. Cows enrolled into the sham induction group had 4 mL of isotonic saline injected into the joint. Cows were dosed with transdermal flunixin at 3.33 mg/kg (1 mL/15 kg), or a placebo at 1 mL/15 kg, every 24 h for 3 d. The first treatment of flunixin or placebo was considered the start of the study, identified as time 0 h. Data were collected from all cows for 120 h following the initial treatment application. Outcome measures included plasma cortisol; substance P; visual lameness assessment; mechanical nociception threshold (MNT), presented as difference between left and right feet; infrared thermography (IRT), presented as difference between left and right feet; and gait analysis using a pressure mat. Cortisol concentrations were lower for the L+F group starting at 1.5 h after drug administration. Substance P levels showed no evidence for treatment differences among groups. Differences between the left hind MNT and right hind MNT were detected, with S+P having the lowest difference at -0.04 kilograms-force (kgf; 95% CI: -1.86 to 1.78 kgf), and L+P having the highest at -2.96 kgf (95% CI: 1.55 to 4.36 kgf). The L+F group was intermediate at -2.08 kgf (95% CI: 0.89 to 3.27 kgf). Similarly, when the difference between the maximum temperatures of the coronary band were examined via IRT, the L+P group had the highest difference at 1.64°C (95% CI: 1.02 to 2.26°C), with the L+F and S+P groups measuring 0.57°C (95% CI: 0.06 to 1.08°C) and 0.53°C (95% CI: -0.2 to 1.25°C) respectively. We found no evidence for differences among treatment groups when analyzing force, contact pressure, step impulse, or stride length. Based on differences in MNT, IRT, and cortisol, transdermal flunixin is an effective analgesic agent for induced lameness. Multiple doses of transdermal flunixin may be required to be clinically effective, based on MNT and IRT data. Further investigation of transdermal flunixin and its analgesic effects is warranted in naturally occurring lameness.

Abstract P2-12-01: Dose- and exposure-response relationship and biomarker correlation analysis in breast tumors from patients treated with capivasertib, an AKT inhibitor, in the STAKT randomized, placebo controlled pre-surgical study

Background: Capivasertib (AZD5363), an AKT1,2,3 inhibitor, significantly improved progression-free and overall survival when added to paclitaxel in triple negative breast cancer (BC) patients (Schmid et al. ASCO 2018). We have previously reported in STAKT, robust target inhibition at 480mg BD versus placebo, including significant decreases in the primary biomarkers (PBs) - Ki67, pPRAS40 & pGSK3β - in primary BCs (Robertson et al. SABCS 2017). We now report the dose- and exposure-response relationship of capivasertib and the correlation between primary and secondary (pAKT, pS6, nuclear FOXO3a) tumor biomarkers.

Design: STAKT was a two-stage, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled 'window-of-opportunity' trial in newly diagnosed ER+ BC patients. Stage 1 assessed capivasertib at a dose of 480mg BD p.o. versus placebo. Stage 2 assessed capivasertib at two lower doses 360mg and 240mg BD. Tumor biopsies were taken prior to 1st dose and after 4.5 days of dosing. Evaluable patients (who required pre-defined minimum baseline PD values for PBs) included placebo (n=11), capivasertib at 480mg (n=17), 360mg (n=5) and 240mg (n=6). Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were scheduled at pre-dose; 2, 4, optional 6 & 8 hrs post first dose on Day 1; ˜2-4 h post last dose on Day 5 (before biopsy). The % change from baseline for PBs were evaluated against the following exposure variables (placebo=0): i) Dose, ii) Observed Cmax Day 1 (˜2h post-dose), iii) Observed plasma concentration on Day 5, iv) Model-predicted plasma concentration Day 5 at time of biopsy, and v) Model-predicted AUC on Day 5. Spearman correlation coefficient measured the strength and direction of association between biomarkers.

Results:

· Significant mean reductions in % change from baseline were observed for the PBs pGSK3β (-39%; p&lt;0.006), pPRAS40 (-50%; p&lt;0.0001) and Ki67 (-23%; p=0.052) at 480mg versus placebo. At 360mg and 240mg, mean % changes from baseline in pGSK3β were -27% and -9%, respectively; in pPRAS40 -45% and -28%, respectively; and in Ki67 0% and +22%, respectively.

· Dose-response relationships for individual % change from baseline could be described by an Emax model for all PBs. Overall, the correlation to PK exposure (observed or predicted) was similar to the correlation to dose.

· Correlation coefficient analyses between biomarkers at capivasertib 480mg BD identified- i) Positive correlations for pGSK3β with Ki67 (ρ = 0.52, p-value &lt; 0.05) & with pS6 (ρ = 0.54, p-value&lt;0.05); ii) Negative correlations between FOXO3a and Ki67 (ρ = -0.75, p-value&lt;0.001) pGSK3β (ρ = -0.71, p-value&lt;0.001) & also pS6 (ρ = -0.61, p-value&lt;0.001).Correlation coefficients for lower doses are not robust due to small sample size in these groups.

Conclusions

· Capivasertib caused dose- and concentration- dependent effects on biomarkers after only 4.5 days.

· Significant changes in the PBs were demonstrated at 480 mg BD. Biomarker changes was observed at 360mg and 240mg BD, but statistical analysis was limited by the small sample size at lower doses.

· Correlation between a number of tumor biomarkers (relative changes) were identified for capivasertib 480mg BD.

Citation Format: Gee J, Coleman RE, Cheung KL, Evans A, Holcombe C, Skene A, Rea D, Ahmed S, Jahan A, Horgan K, Rauchhaus P, Littleford R, Finlay P, Cheung A, Cullberg M, de Bruin E, Foxley A, Koulai L, Pass M, Schiavon G, Rugman P, Deb R, Robertson JFR. Dose- and exposure-response relationship and biomarker correlation analysis in breast tumors from patients treated with capivasertib, an AKT inhibitor, in the STAKT randomized, placebo controlled pre-surgical study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-01.

The presentation, management and outcome of inflammatory breast cancer cases in the UK: Data from a multi-centre retrospective review

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory Breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive form of breast cancer. Its incidence and behaviour in the UK is poorly characterised. We collected retrospective data from hospitals in the UK and Ireland to describe the presentation, pathology, treatment and clinical course of IBC in the UK.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with IBC diagnosed between 1997-2014 at fourteen UK and Irish hospitals were identified from local breast unit databases. Patient characteristics, tumour pathology and stage, and details of surgical, systemic and radiotherapy treatment and follow-up data were collected from electronic patient records and medical notes.

RESULT

This retrospective review identified 445 patients with IBC accounting for 0.4-1.8% of invasive breast cancer cases. Median follow-up was 4.2 years. 53.2% of tumours were grade 3, 56.2% were oestrogen receptor positive, 31.3% were HER2 positive and 25.1% were triple negative. 20.7% of patients had distant metastases at presentation. Despite trimodality treatment in 86.4%, 40.1% of stage III patients developed distant metastases. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 61.0% for stage III and 21.4% for stage IV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series of UK IBC patients reported to date. It indicates a lower incidence than in American series, but confirms that IBC has a high risk of recurrence with poor survival despite contemporary multi-modality therapy. A national strategy is required to facilitate translational research into this aggressive disease.

Active Monitoring Versus Immediate Treatment of Women With Localised, Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Does It Make Economic Sense?

Background: Controversy persists about the overdiagnosis of low risk breast cancers identified by breast cancer screening programs. Low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive breast condition with an uncertain risk of invasive progression. Standard management consists of immediate surgical treatment, with or without radiotherapy and adjuvant therapy. Active monitoring of low risk DCIS via annual mammography is proposed as an alternative strategy to immediate surgery to reduce the harm of overdiagnosis, whereby the disease is only treated upon disease progression. However, the costs and benefits of active monitoring are not well researched in the breast cancer setting. Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of active monitoring versus immediate surgical management in women diagnosed with low grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods: A Markov state transition model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of women aged 50 years and over with low risk DCIS over a lifetime horizon. A cost-utility analysis was performed to compare a strategy of observation (active monitoring) versus immediate surgical treatment using an annual time cycle. Transition probabilities, costs and utilities were obtained from national mortality and cost data, published meta-analyses, primary data collection of utilities and expert opinion. A healthcare perspective was adopted to present the results. Primary outcomes were assessed in terms of cost per quality-adjusted-life-year (cost per QALY). Multiple sensitivity analyses were undertaken to determine effect of parameter uncertainty on results. Results: The cumulative costs and QALYs for each age cohort are presented. Active monitoring is a cost-effective strategy for the management of low risk breast cancer in older women with comorbid conditions. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICERs for all women to be affected by baseline probability of disease progression, age, cost of surgery and utility. Conclusion: Conservative management of ductal carcinoma in situ via active monitoring may be cost-effective compared with immediate surgical treatment in a selected cohort of older women with low risk disease.

Overcoming Overdiagnosis: Women´s Preferences for Improving Breast Cancer Screening

Background: Breast cancer screening is effective in reducing breast cancer mortality, but there is increasing concern that it may also lead to overdiagnosis; the detection and treatment of a cancer that would never have presented symptomatically during the woman's lifetime. Conservative management of low-risk breast cancer may reduce the harm of overdiagnosis resulting from mammographic screening programs, yet little is known about how such strategies might impact upon quality of life. Aim: To quantify women's preferences for managing low risk breast cancers identified by breast cancer screening. Methods: Utilities (measures of preference) were obtained from women with and without a history of breast cancer for seven health states reflecting low risk screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using standard gambles. Demographics and a history of prior screening participation or breast cancer diagnosis were examined as predictors of screening and treatment pathway preferences. Results: Utilities were lower for breast cancers treated with mastectomy or invasive adjuvant treatment. The impact of active monitoring on quality of life was comparable to breast conserving surgery, although women in both patient and general population groups rated active monitoring more favorably as the risk of disease spread was decreased. There was some variation in ratings across patients suggesting that individual risk aversion does affect preferences for the type of conservative management valued. Conclusion: Overdiagnosis remains a challenge for improving the current breast cancer screening program. Active monitoring of low risk ductal carcinoma in situ may provide an acceptable solution for reducing the impact of overdiagnosis and overtreatment resulting from breast cancer screening on quality of life.

Disease-free and overall survival at 3.5 years for neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, for women with HER2 negative early breast cancer: ARTemis Trial

Background

The ARTemis trial previously reported that addition of neoadjuvant bevacizumab (Bev) to docetaxel (D) followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (D-FEC) in HER2 negative breast cancer improved the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. We present disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with central pathology review.

Patients and methods

Patients were randomized to 3 cycles of D followed by 3 cycles of FEC (D-FEC), ±4 cycles of Bev (Bev + D-FEC). DFS and OS were analyzed by treatment and by central pathology reviewed pCR and Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) class.

Results

A total of 800 patients were randomized [median follow-up 3.5 years (IQR 3.2–4.4)]. DFS and OS were similar across treatment arms [DFS hazard ratio (HR)=1.18 (95% CI 0.89–1.57), P = 0.25; OS HR = 1.26 (95% CI 0.90–1.76), P = 0.19). Both local pathology report review and central histopathology review confirmed a significant improvement in DFS and OS for patients who achieved a pCR [DFS HR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.23–0.63), P < 0.001; OS HR = 0.43 (95% CI 0.24–0.75), P = 0.003]. However, significant heterogeneity was observed (P = 0.02); larger improvements in DFS were obtained with a pCR achieved with D-FEC than a pCR achieved with Bev + D-FEC. As RCB class increased, significantly worse DFS and OS was observed (P for trend <0.0001), which effect was most marked in the ER negative group.

Conclusions

The addition of short course neoadjuvant Bev to standard chemotherapy did not demonstrate a DFS or OS benefit. Achieving a pCR with D-FEC is associated with improved DFS and OS but not when pCR is achieved with Bev + D-FEC. At the present time therefore, Bev is not recommended in early breast cancer.

ClinicalTrials.gov number

NCT01093235.

Pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of transdermal flunixin meglumine in adult Holstein dairy cows

A transdermal formulation of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, flunixin meglumine, has been approved in the United States and Canada for single-dose administration. Transdermal flunixin meglumine was administered to 10 adult Holstein cows in their second or third lactation at the label dose of 3.33 mg/kg every 24 hr for three total treatments. Plasma flunixin concentrations were determined using high-pressure liquid chromatography with mass spectroscopy (HPLC-MS). Pharmacokinetic analysis was completed on each individual animal with noncompartmental methods using computer software. The time to maximum drug concentration (Tmax) was 2.81 hr, and the maximum drug concentration was 1.08 μg/ml. The mean terminal half-life (T½) was determined to be 5.20 hr. Clearance per fraction absorbed (Cl/F) was calculated to be 0.294 L/hr kg^-1 , and volume of distribution of fraction (Vz/F) absorbed was 2.20 L/kg. The mean accumulation factor was 1.10 after three doses. This indicates changes in dosing may not be required when giving multiple doses of flunixin transdermal. Further work is required to investigate the clinical efficacy of transdermal flunixin after multiple daily doses.

Abstract P4-04-06: AZD5363, an AKT inhibitor, significantly inhibits key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and Ki67, in a randomized, placebo, controlled study (STAKT) in human breast cancers

Background: AKT is an important intracellular control point through which Type 1 growth factors and IGFR signal. Mutations in PIK3CA, AKT and PTEN are prevalent in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) and have been implicated in resistance to endocrine therapies. AZD5363 is an inhibitor of AKT 1, 2 and 3 currently in Phase 2 trials for BC and other solid cancers.

Design: The study examined whether AZD5363 impacts on key biomarkers within the AKT pathway and their subsequent effects on Ki67, a marker of tumor proliferation. STAKT is a multi-center, two-stage, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, biomarker 'window-of-opportunity' trial in women with newly diagnosed, previously untreated ER+ BC who were deemed would require chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment regimen. Stage 1 assessed AZD5363 at a dose of 480mg bd p.o. versus matching placebo. Up to 30 patients per arm were permitted, to allow 12 subjects per arm with evaluable paired biopsies - obtained at baseline, and after 4.5 days of AZD5363 / placebo. Primary endpoint markers were pPRAS40, pGSK3β and Ki67 assessed by immunohistochemistry. pPRAS40 and pGSK3β were assessed by H-scores and measured separately for cytoplasmic (cyto), nuclear (nuc) and total (cyto+nuc) staining. Ki67 was assessed as % positive staining of 500 tumor nuclei. Laboratory staff were blinded to treatment arm and whether the biopsies were taken before or after AZD5363/placebo. Changes in marker expression (both absolute and %) between biopsies were calculated, and compared between the two groups. An ANOVA test was applied for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney used if not normally distributed.

Results: 28/36 patients were evaluable with patient & tumor characteristics as follows: 17 received AZD5363 and 11 placebo; the median ages were 48 & 49 years respectively. 27 patients were Caucasian and 1 African-American. Tumors were all ER+. For HER2 status 8 were positive & 9 negative in the AZD5363 treated group compared to 2 & 9 respectively in the placebo group.

For pPRAS40 and pGSK3β cyto was the predominant staining while for Ki67 staining was nuclear. Changes in each marker with associated p-values are shown in the table.

MarkerType of change vs baselineDegree of change in AZD5363 arm (n=17)p-value versus placebo arm (n=11)pPRAS40 (H-score)TotalAbsolute-83.8&lt;0.0001Total%-50.2&lt;0.0001CytoAbsolute-90.0&lt;0.0001Cyto%-55.8&lt;0.0001NucAbsolute+6.90.42Nuc%+8.90.94pGSK3β (H-score)TotalAbsolute-55.30.006Total%-39.00.006CytoAbsolute-53.60.006Cyto%-39.20.006NucAbsolute-2.80.065Nuc%-36.50.058Ki67 (% cells+)Absolute-9.60.031%-29.40.052

Conclusions• AZD5363 for 4.5 days caused highly significant falls in pGSK3β and pPRAS40, key markers of AKT pathway activation

• AZD53643 also caused a significant decline in Ki67 even after only 4.5 days of drug. This is one of the shortest 'window'-studies to report such an early effect on proliferation.

• Placebo controlled 'window' studies of this short duration can provide important evidence of the therapeutic potential early in a drug's development.

Citation Format: Robertson JFR, Coleman RE, Cheung KL, Evans A, Holcombe C, Skene A, Rea D, Ahmed S, Jahan A, Kelly S, Horgan K, Rauchhaus P, Littleford R, Foxley A, Lindemann JPO, Pass M, Rugman P, Deb R, Finlay P, Gee JMW. AZD5363, an AKT inhibitor, significantly inhibits key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and Ki67, in a randomized, placebo, controlled study (STAKT) in human breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-06.

Abstract P4-15-13: When is cancer not really cancer? The PREvent ductal carcinoma in situ invasive overtreatment now (PRECISION)* initiative

Background

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) now represents 20-25% of all breast neoplasia due to large-scale detection by widely adopted population-based breast cancer screening programs. As a result, thousands of women are confronted with DCIS each year: more than 8,000 in the UK, 2,500 in the Netherlands, and some 50,000 in the US. Conventional management includes surgery, supplemented by radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy, but overtreats the majority of DCIS as ˜1% recur annually and breast cancer mortality is ˜3% at 20 years. Uncertainty as to which DCIS lesions will progress to invasive cancer or, after excision, which will return with recurrent DCIS or invasive breast cancer drives this overtreatment. This urges us to learn how to distinguish DCIS that may progress to invasive breast cancer from the majority of indolent DCIS. Such distinction may be best achieved by synergistic international collaboration between leading global experts from various disciplines, driven by the essential input from patient voices as full members of the research team.

Aim

PRECISION (PREvent ductal Carcinoma In Situ Invasive Overtreatment Now) aims to save thousands of women with low risk DCIS the burden of intensive inappropriate treatment of DCIS (surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal therapies) through the discovery of new data and development of novel tests that promote informed and shared decision-making between patients and clinicians, without compromising the excellent outcomes for DCIS management presently achieved.

Methods

First, three large DCIS cohorts and supplementary resources will be collected enabling in depth molecular studies. Second, extensive genomic characterization, immune profiling and imaging analysis will be performed. In vivo and in vitro modeling will be performed to study the biology of DCIS in detail. Finally, all clinical, immune, and molecular data will be incorporated into a clinical risk prediction model. This risk prediction model will be validated in three prospective randomized DCIS trials in the US (COMET trial), UK (LORIS trial), and mainland Europe (LORD trial).

How the results of this research will be used

The discoveries from our laboratory studies, including a risk stratification model, will be cross-validated in three prospective trials of DCIS active surveillance versus conventional treatment (the COMET, LORIS and LORD trials). As such, the main result of this study will be that we can identify a group of women for which active surveillance for DCIS could be a safer alternative to intensive treatment. Ultimately, this may also contribute to a more reassuring perception of risk regarding non-life threatening precancerous lesions in general, reducing anxiety and preserving quality of life.

* The PRECISION Team is a Cancer Research UK Grand Challenge Award 2017 winning team and will be jointly funded by Cancer Research UK and the Dutch Cancer Society.

Citation Format: Wesseling J, Thompson A, Nik-Zainal S, Futreal A, Hwang S, Jonkers J, Lips E, Rea D, On Behalf of the PRECISION Team. When is cancer not really cancer? The PREvent ductal carcinoma in situ invasive overtreatment now (PRECISION)* initiative [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-13.

Abstract P2-09-17: Evaluation of the oncomine comprehensive assay for the identification of actionable mutations for therapeutic stratification from the TEAM pathology cohort

Large-scale sequencing initiatives have revealed a wealth of common and novel variants as well as copy-number aberrations, across different malignancies. This growing list of variants/aberrations can sometimes be matched to specific therapeutics. Such “actionable mutations/changes” hold promise for personalized treatment in the future, with treatments tailored to molecular abnormalities. Presently, women with hormone positive early breast cancer continue to experience improved survival on adjuvant anti-hormone therapy, but a significant number of women continue to progress. Therefore, there is a need to identify those women for whom current therapies are insufficient and to identify alternative therapeutic interventions. We explored the used of genetic profiling using a comprehensive solid tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) assay (the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay, OCA) to characterize early invasive breast cancer. The OCA is based on the Ion Torrent™ NGS platform and Ion AmpliSeq™ library preparation technology, coupled to the Oncomine™ Knowledgebase, for target selection, variant calling, and data annotations. The OCA includes 87 genes for hotspot mutation detection, 48 genes for full length sequencing and 43 genes for focal copy number assessment. The OCA provides a standardized informatics workflow and quality control (QC) parameters to process samples in a translational clinical research setting. To explore the application of the OCA to early invasive breast cancers, we performed a retrospective pilot study in a subset of cases from the TEAM trial. From the TEAM pathology samples, 420 were chosen in a case-control fashion, 413 samples were analyzed, 388 samples passed standard QC metrics, and 254 samples (65%) were found to contain 368 variants with Oncomine Knowledgebase annotations. Briefly, variants of PIK3CA were most frequent at 42.7% (157/368), followed by TP53 at 27.2% (100/368), PTEN at 5.7% (21/368), BRCA2 at 3.8% (14/368), SF3B1 (12/368), AKT1 (11/368) and PTCH1 (11/368) at 3.3%, 3.0%, 3.0%; respectively. Other variants were detected in ATM, ERBB2, RB1, FGFR2, NF1, CDKN2A, PIK3R1 and others. Amongst the 43 genes assessed for copy-number, 23 showed copy-number changes across 132 samples totalling 167 CNVs. 256 samples showed no copy-number alterations in any of the genes on the panel. ERBB2 was most frequently altered at 28.1% (47/167), followed by FGFR1 at 23.4% (39/167), CCND1 at 15.0% (25/167) and MDM2 at 10.2% (17/167). Copy-number losses were identified in TP53, RB1, PTEN, BRCA2 at 0.6% each; as well as CDKN2A at 1.8% (3/167). Analytical validation of a subset of gene variants and copy-number changes will be presented in addition to the evidence of potential future application of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay to precision oncology goals.

Citation Format: Bayani J, Crozier C, Quintayo MA, Amemiya Y, Zhang X, Larivière M, Sadis S, Smith JM, Hasenburg A, Kieback D, Markopoulos C, Dirix L, Yaffe M, Seth A, Feilotter H, Rea D, Bartlett JMS. Evaluation of the oncomine comprehensive assay for the identification of actionable mutations for therapeutic stratification from the TEAM pathology cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-17.

Difficulties in the Diagnosis and Management of Paediatric Posterior Circulation Stroke

We present two children with posterior circulation stroke (PCS) highlighting the wide spectrum of presentation, the need for complete radiological assessment, and the relatively high recurrence risk.

Abstract P3-17-06: LORIS trial of active monitoring for DCIS: How does the online pathology eligibility review process work?

Introduction

The LORIS Trial is a UK randomized clinical trial comparing active monitoring with surgery for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), defined as low or low-intermediate grade DCIS without comedo necrosis, as diagnosed on vacuum-assisted (wide bore) core needle samples. Because of the inconsistency of grading DCIS, we have underpinned this trial with a Central Histopathology Review (CHR) before randomisation. The process of the CHR for the first 22 months of a two year pilot study between July 2014 and May 2016 is reported here.

Patients and methods

Patients were eligible for CHR if they satisfied all of the eligibility criteria and had locally reported low or intermediate grade DCIS. Patients were identified at 28 pilot sites and were registered for potential trial entry following written informed consent before being subjected to CHR. CHR comprised online examination of digitally scanned histology slides of all material from all diagnostic biopsies and was performed by at least two of the three LORIS specialist breast pathologists. Histology slides were submitted using Royal Mail Safebox® to the University of Birmingham where they were digitally scanned and made available for review via the Leica digital image hub. The outcome of the review was reported in a separate secure online database by completion of a Central Pathology Review Form. Access to both online systems is password protected. Eligibility was confirmed if two pathologists agreed that there was low or low to intermediate grade DCIS and no comedo necrosis. A maximum of 7 calendar days from receipt of the diagnostic material was allowed for the central review process.

The digital images of the histology slides are stored by the Leica system for future reference.

Results

100 patients were registered and their slides reviewed. 55 of these were deemed eligible by CHR; of these 38 have been randomised. 45 patients were deemed ineligible, most commonly due to grade being in the upper half of the intermediate category and/or comedo necrosis. In addition, 9 patients were deemed not to have DCIS and 1 patient had invasive disease.

Grouping the grade categories as low and low to intermediate grade (low risk and eligible for randomisation) Vs intermediate to high and high cytonuclear grade (ineligible for randomisation) showed 91% agreement on grade category amongst the reviewing pathologists.

Results of the central review were made available to sites within 7 days for 97% of cases submitted. On average, central review was completed within 4 days. Average time between registration and randomisation was 3 weeks. The LORIS central review pathologists found online viewing and reporting of sections acceptable.

Conclusions

Central Histopathology Review using online viewing of digital slides provides timely and efficient pathology Quality Assurance in this clinical trial setting, with acceptable turnaround times and good agreement between reviewing specialist breast pathologists. This process will be continued in the main phase of the trial.

Citation Format: Thomas J, Hanby A, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Rea D, Gaunt C, Young J, Francis A. LORIS trial of active monitoring for DCIS: How does the online pathology eligibility review process work? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-17-06.

Abstract P3-06-03: The short term effects of an AKT inhibitor (AZD5363) on biomarkers of the AKT pathway and anti-tumour activity in a breast cancer paired biopsy study (STAKT trial)

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P3-13-05: Multicentre observational study evaluating why mastectomies are advised by UK multi-disciplinary teams

Background: Marked variation in mastectomy rates exists across the UK. Identification of variation in practice is a key step towards standardisation of service. The rationale for advising mastectomy by multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) has not been previously explored in the UK. The main aim of this multicentre observational study was to describe current practice in MDT decision-making for patients undergoing mastectomy. A secondary aim was to determine utilisation of neoadjuvant therapies.

Methods: A multicentre, protocol-driven, prospective cohort study, led by trainees of the West Midlands Research Collaborative was performed during July and September 2015. Data was collected securely using Research Electronic Data Capture. Inclusion criteria were: women &gt;18 years undergoing mastectomy for in situ/invasive disease; presenting with symptomatic or screen detected disease; performed as a primary procedure or following failure of breast conserving surgery (BCS); with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IR).

Results: A total of 1776 patients (1823 mastectomies; 47 bilateral procedures) from 68 units were included. Median age was 63 years (range 20-99). In total 481 (26%) IRs were performed; median IR rate was 22% (range 0-67%).

Mastectomy was advised by the MDT in 1402 (77%) cases. Reasons for advising mastectomy are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. MDT rationale for advising mastectomyRationaleNumber of mastectomiesProportion (%)Large tumour to breast size ratio making BCS unsuitable53029.1Multi-centric disease on imaging37220.4Extensive malignant microcalcification1799.8Previous radiotherapy (Breast/Mantle)1638.9Requiring further surgery for positive margins following BCS1588.7Central tumour1136.2Large primary tumour, patient not suitable for neoadjuvant endocrine or chemotherapy treatment1126.1Neoadjuvant therapy failed to downsize tumour to allow BCS884.8Neoadjuvant therapy apparently successful but mastectomy advised anyway794.3Family History-High Risk512.8

In total 153 patients with oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) tumours were offered neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET); 131 (86%) received treatment. A total of 293 post-menopausal women with uni-focal, ER+ tumours, &gt;20mm were not offered NET; mastectomy was advised by MDTs in 202 patients and the rationale for advising mastectomy in 173 patients (86%) was large tumour to breast size ratio.

In total 104 patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 over-expressing (HER2+) tumours were offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab (NACT); 89 (86%) received treatment. A total of 88 women &lt;70 years old with HER2+ tumours, &gt;20mm were not offered NACT; mastectomy was advised by MDTs in 75 patients and rationale for advising mastectomy in 45 women (60%) was large tumour to breast size ratio.

Conclusions: Although most mastectomies are advised for large tumour to breast size ratio, there is inconsistency in the utilisation of neoadjuvant therapies with many potentially eligible patients with large tumours not being given the opportunity to be downsized. Application of standardised recommendations for neoadjuvant treatment resulting in increased and appropriate use of neoadjuvant therapies could reduce the number of mastectomies advised by MDTs.

Citation Format: Singh JK, McEvoy K, Marla S, Wilcox M, Rea D, Hallissey MT, Francis A, West Midlands Research Collaborative. Multicentre observational study evaluating why mastectomies are advised by UK multi-disciplinary teams [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-05.

Abstract OT1-03-01: The UK LORIS trial: Randomizing patients with low or low intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to surgery or active monitoring

Background: The independent review of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme reported (The Lancet, Volume 380, Issue 9855, Page 1778, 17 Nov 2012) on the benefits and harms of breast screening. It concluded that breast screening saves lives and acknowledged the existence of overtreatment. It encouraged randomized trials to elucidate the appropriate treatment of screen-detected DCIS to gain a better understanding of its natural history. The LORIS trial addresses the possible overtreatment of low and low/intermediate grade screen-detected (low risk) DCIS by randomizing patients to standard surgical treatment or active monitoring, each with long term follow up.

Trial Design: LORIS is a phase III, multicentre, 2 arm study, with a built in 2 year Feasibility Phase, in patients confirmed to have low risk DCIS defined by strict criteria and determined by central pathology review. Patients will be randomized between standard surgery and active monitoring with annual mammography. Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 10 years.

Eligibility Criteria:

1) Female, age ≥ 46 years

2) Screen-detected or incidental microcalcification (with no mass lesion clinically or on imaging)

3) Low risk DCIS on large volume vacuum-assisted biopsy, confirmed by central pathology review

4) Patient fit to undergo surgery

5) No previous breast cancer or ipsilateral DCIS diagnosis

6) Written informed consent

Specific Aims: The LORIS Trial aims to establish whether patients with newly diagnosed low risk DCIS can safely avoid surgery without detriment to their wellbeing (psychological and physical) and whether those patients that do require surgery can be identified by pathological and radiological means.

Primary endpoint: Ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival time

Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; mastectomy rate; time to mastectomy; time to surgery; patient reported outcomes; health resource utilisation and assessment of predictive biomarkers.

A digital image data repository and tissue bank will provide a prospective resource for both translational and imaging studies.

Statistical Methods: A total of 932 patients will be randomized to a non-inferiority design to test the null hypothesis that active monitoring of women diagnosed with low risk DCIS is not non-inferior in terms of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival (iiBCFS) time compared to treatment with surgery. The iiBCFS time will be compared across the two arms on a per protocol and intent-to-treat basis, using a 1-sided (α=0.05) log-rank test for non-inferiority. The iiBCFS rate is assumed to be 97.5% in the surgery arm at 5 years, utilizing 80% power to exclude a difference of more than 2.5% in the active monitoring arm.

Present Accrual and Target Accrual: 32 UK centres are open for the Feasibility Phase of the trial which is nearing completion. The web-based central pathology review process is functioning efficiently, with a one week maximum turn around. Registrations and sites randomizing patients are on or above target. Randomizations are currently approximately 70% of target. A total of 60 centres will open in the main trial.

Contact Information: For further information, please email the LORIS Trial Office LORIS@trials.bham.ac.uk.

Citation Format: Francis A, Bartlett J, Billingham L, Bowden S, Brookes C, Dodwell D, Evans A, Fairbrother P, Fallowfield L, Gaunt C, Hanby A, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Rea D, Reed M, Roberts T, Thomas J, Wallis M, Wilcox M, Young J. The UK LORIS trial: Randomizing patients with low or low intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to surgery or active monitoring [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-01.

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Most reports on chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) focus on efficacy, particularly on molecular response and outcome. In contrast, adverse events (AEs) are often reported as infrequent, minor, tolerable and manageable, but they are increasingly important as therapy is potentially lifelong and multiple TKIs are available. For this reason, the European LeukemiaNet panel for CML management recommendations presents an exhaustive and critical summary of AEs emerging during CML treatment, to assist their understanding, management and prevention. There are five major conclusions. First, the main purpose of CML treatment is the antileukemic effect. Suboptimal management of AEs must not compromise this first objective. Second, most patients will have AEs, usually early, mostly mild to moderate, and which will resolve spontaneously or are easily controlled by simple means. Third, reduction or interruption of treatment must only be done if optimal management of the AE cannot be accomplished in other ways, and frequent monitoring is needed to detect resolution of the AE as early as possible. Fourth, attention must be given to comorbidities and drug interactions, and to new events unrelated to TKIs that are inevitable during such a prolonged treatment. Fifth, some TKI-related AEs have emerged which were not predicted or detected in earlier studies, maybe because of suboptimal attention to or absence from the preclinical data. Overall, imatinib has demonstrated a good long-term safety profile, though recent findings suggest underestimation of symptom severity by physicians. Second and third generation TKIs have shown higher response rates, but have been associated with unexpected problems, some of which could be irreversible. We hope these recommendations will help to minimise adverse events, and we believe that an optimal management of them will be rewarded by better TKI compliance and thus better CML outcomes, together with better quality of life.

Abstract PD2-02: NEO-EXCEL phase III neoadjuvant trial of pre-operative exemestane or letrozole +/- celecoxib in the treatment of ER positive postmenopausal early breast cancer

COX2 has been implicated in breast tumorigenesis, tumour proliferation & invasion. The role of COX2 in carcinogenesis is thought to be related to its abilities to increase production of prostaglandins, convert pro-carcinogens to carcinogens, inhibit apoptosis, promote angiogenesis, modulate inflammation & immune function & increase tumour cell invasiveness. COX2 inhibition may synergise with aromatase inhibition in controlling endocrine responsive breast cancer. The COX2 product prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) & cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL6) can up regulate aromatase expression suggesting that aromatase inhibition may be more effective in combination with a COX2 inhibitor. There may be additional COX2 mediated anticancer activity. The hypothesis addressed is that activity of aromatase inhibitors(AI) as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer may be enhanced by the addition of a COX2 inhibitor.

TRIAL OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the activity of AIs as neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy for ER positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women may be enhanced by the addition of the selective COX2 inhibitor celecoxib.

TRIAL DESIGN

Prospective phase III multicentre randomised trial. Patients were randomised to receive 16 weeks of exemestane 25 mg daily or letrozole 2.5 mg daily (open label) and celecoxib 400 mg twice daily or matched placebo (double blinded). Translational research tumour samples were collected before, during & after therapy.

KEY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Post menopausal, ER positive, invasive cancer, 2cms or greater with calipers & visible on USS.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Objective clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment by RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

Primary Outcome; Response to treatment has been calculated for 266 patients (Table 1). Response rate was 73% in the celecoxib arm & 55% in the placebo arm (p=0.0022). The response rates 4 arm comparison are shown in Table 2. After adjustment for AI effect the significant difference in response rates remained (p=0.0023); the difference in response rates was greater in the exemestane treated group (29%) compared to the letrozole group (7%) although heterogeneity between AI arms was statistically non-significant (p=0.06).

Table 1 Primary Outcome Results: response ratesOUTCOMEPLACEBO N (%)CELECOXIB N (%)TOTAL N (%)X2statisticP-valueRESPONSE73(55)97(73%)170 (64%)9.38820.0022NO RESPONSE60 (45%)36 (27%)96 (36%)  TOTAL133133266  

Table 2: Response Rates 4 Arm Comparison EXEMESTANELETROZOLERESPONSEPLACEBO n(%)CELECOXIB n(%)TOTAL n(%)PLACEBO n(%)CELECOXIB n(%)TOTAL n(%)RESPONSE33 (49)52(78)85(63)40(61)45(68)85(64)NO RESPONSE34(51)15(22)49(37)26(39)21(32)47(36)TOTAL67671346666132

Secondary outcome; There was an USS response rate of 42% v 37% for celecoxib & placebo arms respectively (p=0.2513)

CONCLUSION

The addition of the COX2 inhibitor celecoxib to an AI significantly & substantially increased the clinical response from 55% to 73%. Effect on tumour size assessed with USS is less marked with a non-significant increase in responses from 37% to 42%.

This work was supported by CRUK: CRUK/06/005 and Pfizer.

Citation Format: Rea D, Francis A, Poole C, Brookes C, Stein R, Bartlett J, Dunn J, Canney P, Sutton R, Daoud R, Hallissey M, Achuthan R, Grant M, Babrah J, Smith S, Fraser J, Desai A, Al Dubaisi M, Patel A, Bristol J, Chandrasekharan S, Prest C, Jewkes A. NEO-EXCEL phase III neoadjuvant trial of pre-operative exemestane or letrozole +/- celecoxib in the treatment of ER positive postmenopausal early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-02.

Abstract OT3-02-12: OPTIMA (optimal personalised treatment of early breast cancer usIng multi-parameter analysis), a prospective trial to validate the predictive utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions

Background: Multi-parameter gene expression assays (MPAs) are widely used to estimate individual patient residual risk and to guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive HER2-negative node-negative early breast cancer. These uses of MPAs have not yet been prospectively validated. OPTIMA aims to validate the use of MPA testing to predict chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population.

Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded multi-center, phase 3 randomized controlled trial with an adaptive two-stage design. The preliminary phase (OPTIMA prelim) evaluated the performance of MPAs to identify a suitable test(s) to be used in the main efficacy trial and assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a large UK trial. Eligible patients are men or women aged 40 years or older who have surgically resected early stage breast cancer, which is ER-positive and HER2-negative and who have either 1-9 involved axillary lymph nodes or tumors of at least 30mm diameter. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment. Those with a tumor categorized as "high-risk" by the test will be assigned to standard management whilst those at "low-risk" will be treated with endocrine therapy alone. OPTIMA prelim used Oncotype DX as the primary discriminator; the main trial will use Prosigna (PAM50). The co-primary outcomes are (1) Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) and (2) cost-effectiveness of test-directed therapy compared to standard practice. Secondary outcomes include IDFS in "low-risk" patients, distant disease free survival, breast cancer specific survival, overall survival and quality of life. An integrated qualitative recruitment study will identify and address challenges to recruitment and informed consent. Tumor blocks from all consenting participants will be banked allowing the performance of alternative MPA technologies to be evaluated. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 4 years will permit demonstration of 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment, with 5% significance and 85% power, assuming 3 years follow-up and a control arm 5-year IDFS of at least 85%. The addition of patients from OPTIMA prelim will allow non-inferiority to be assessed with 2.5% significance.

Results: OPTIMA-prelim recruited 412 patients in 23 months from 35 sites. It confirmed the acceptability of randomization to patients with a 47% acceptance rate, and to clinicians and hence the feasibility of a large prospective trial of test-directed treatment running in 100-plus UK sites. It showed that investment into research on test-directed therapy, especially with Prosigna, should be of substantial value to the NHS.

Conclusion: OPTIMA, as one of two large scale prospective trials validating the use of test-guided chemotherapy in node-positive hormone-sensitive early breast cancer will have a global impact on patient treatment. Recruitment into the main efficacy trial will commence in October 2015.

Funding: Project funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501). Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the DoH.

Citation Format: Stein RC, Marshall A, Hall PS, Bartlett JMS, Rooshenas L, Campbell A, Cameron DA, Rea D, Macpherson I, Earl HM, Poole CJ, Francis A, Morgan A, Harmer V, Pinder SE, Stallard N, Donovan J, Hulme C, McCabe C, Hughes-Davies L, Makris A, Dunn JA. OPTIMA (optimal personalised treatment of early breast cancer usIng multi-parameter analysis), a prospective trial to validate the predictive utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-12.

Abstract OT2-02-04: The LORIS trial: A multicentre, randomised phase III trial of standard surgery versus active monitoring in women with newly diagnosed low risk ductal carcinoma in situ

Background: The independent review of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme reported (The Lancet, Volume 380, Issue 9855, Pages 1778 - 1786, 17 November 2012) on the benefits & harms of breast screening. It concluded that breast screening saves lives & acknowledged overtreatment. It encouraged randomized trials to elucidate the appropriate treatment of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to gain a better understanding of its natural history. The LORIS trial addresses overtreatment of low & low/Intermediate grade screen detected (low risk) DCIS by randomizing patients to standard surgical treatment or active monitoring.

Trial Design: LORIS is a phase III, multicentre, 2 arm study, with a 2 year feasibility phase, in patients confirmed to have low risk DCIS by central pathology review. Patients are randomised to standard surgery or active monitoring with annual mammography. Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 10 years.

Key Eligibility Criteria:

1) Female 46 years or over.

2) Screen-detected or incidental microcalcification (with no mass lesion clinically or on imaging)

3) Low risk DCIS on large volume vacuum-assisted biopsy, confirmed by central pathology review

4) Patient fit to undergo surgery

Specific Aims: The LORIS Trial aims to establish whether patients with newly diagnosed low risk DCIS can safely avoid surgery without detriment to their wellbeing (psychological and physical) & whether those patients that do require surgery can be identified by pathological and radiological means.

Primary endpoint: Ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival rate at 5 years

Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; mastectomy rate; time to mastectomy; time to surgery; patient reported outcomes & health resource utilisation.

A digital image data repository and tissue bank provide a prospective resource for both translational & imaging studies.

Statistical Methods: A total of 932 patients will be randomized to a non-inferiority design to test the null hypothesis that active monitoring of women diagnosed with low risk DCIS is not non-inferior in terms of 5 year ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival (iiBCFS) rate compared to treatment with surgery. The iiBCFS rate will be compared across the two arms on a per protocol and intent-to-treat basis, using a 1-sided (α=0.05) log-rank test for non-inferiority. The iiBCFS rate is assumed to be 97.5% in the surgery arm giving 80% power to exclude a difference of more than 2.5% in the active monitoring arm at 5 years.

Present Accrual and Target Accrual: 21 UK centres are open & the feasibility phase of the trial is recruiting to target. The web based central pathology review process is functioning well with a one week maximum turn around. A further 40 centres will be opened on completion of the feasibility phase.

Contact: LORIS@trials.bham.ac.uk

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research [Health Technology Assessment Programme] (project number 11/36/16)

Department of Health Disclaimer: The views & opinions expressed therein are those of the authors & do not necessarily reflect those of the Health Technology Assessment Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Citation Format: Francis A, Fallowfield L, Bartlett J, Thomas J, Wallis M, Hanby A, Pinder S, Evans A, Billingham L, Brookes C, Dodwell D, Fairbrother P, Gaunt C, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Pirrie S, Reed M, Roberts T, Wilcox M, Young J, Rea D. The LORIS trial: A multicentre, randomised phase III trial of standard surgery versus active monitoring in women with newly diagnosed low risk ductal carcinoma in situ. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-02-04.