Thrombophilia and pulmonary endarterectomy

In the present study, we compared groups of patients with and without thrombophilia, who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), definitive treatment for chronic pulmonary hypertension resulting from thromboembolic disease.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Between September 2004 and June 2007, we operated 54 patients with CTEPH. We divided our patients into three groups. Group I patients, had one or more signs of serious thrombophilia (15 patients), Group II patients, had no signs of thrombophilia (23 patients without thrombophilia and without Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR)), and Group III patients with MTHFR (16 patients with MTHFR only, without any serious thrombophilia).

RESULTS

After the surgery, there was a statistically considerable improvement of hemodynamic parameters (mPA, CI, PVR) in all groups, without a statistical difference between the groups. Comparison of all these groups showed more complications in-group I (thrombophilia), in particular reperfusion oedema, pericardial effusion, and renal insufficiency. Within one month, there was a considerable improvement or normalisation of haemodynamic parameters, an increase in walking distance at the six-minute walking test, and NYHA classification with no significant difference between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early hemodynamic results of patients with thrombophilia after PEA, were comparable to the results of patients without thrombophilia, when we looked at both clinical and hemodynamic improvements. We did not find any differences when we looked at the results between Group II and Group III (MTHF), when we considered the number and type of complications. Patients with thrombophilia in Group I had statistically higher morbidity, especially when it came to a higher number of reperfusion oedema, pericardial effusion, and renal insufficiency.

A retrospective analysis of Terlipressin infusion in patients with refractory hypotension after cardiac surgery

AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Terlipressin in the treatment of severe hypotension in cardiosurgical patients and to assess the differences between the groups of survivors and nonsurvivors.

METHODS

The study population was 27 patients who developed hypotension after cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

All surviving patients developed refractory hypotension early after extracorporeal circulation. Of the 9 nonsurvivors, 3 also experienced postcardiotomy hypotension, while the remaining 6 developed severe hypotension during sepsis. Terlipressin given continuously significantly increased the mean arterial pressure and reduced the heart rate in both groups. Norepinephrine requirements decreased significantly among survivors only. The mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure levels remained unchanged or increased insignificantly, while several liver markers in the survivor group significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

Terlipressin given continuously is a potent vasopressor in patients with norepinephrine-resistant postcardiotomy hypotension; however, Terlipressin treatment failed in patients who developed refractory hypotension during sepsis. We cannot recommend this therapy in such patients as it proved to be hemodynamicaly ineffective and may even worsen the circulatory situation.