1
|
Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Concin N, Davidson B, Fotopoulou C, González-Martin A, Gourley C, Leary A, Lorusso D, Banerjee S, Chiva L, Cibula D, Colombo N, Croce S, Eriksson AG, Falandry C, Fischerova D, Harter P, Joly F, Lazaro C, Lok C, Mahner S, Marmé F, Marth C, McCluggage WG, McNeish IA, Morice P, Nicum S, Oaknin A, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Pignata S, Ramirez PT, Ray-Coquard I, Romero I, Scambia G, Sehouli J, Shapira-Frommer R, Sundar S, Tan DSP, Taskiran C, van Driel WJ, Vergote I, Planchamp F, Sessa C, Fagotti A. ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:248-266. [PMID: 38307807 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- CIBERONC, Madrid; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLLEIDA, University of Lleida, Lleida; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - F Amant
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - B Davidson
- Department of Pathology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A González-Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Program in Solid Tumours-Cima, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Leary
- Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Chiva
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - S Croce
- Department of Biopathology, Bergonié Institut, Bordeaux, France
| | - A G Eriksson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Falandry
- Institute of Aging, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon; CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U1060/Université Lyon 1/INRAE U1397/Hospices Civils Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany
| | - F Joly
- GINECO Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François-Baclesse, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France
| | - C Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL-CIBERONC), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Lok
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Mahner
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - F Marmé
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - W G McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - I A McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Nicum
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona
| | - J A Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario - INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - I Romero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - G Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - J Sehouli
- North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), Berlin; Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - S Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University of Singapore (NUS) Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Taskiran
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - W J van Driel
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - C Sessa
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - A Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
González-Martín A, Harter P, Leary A, Lorusso D, Miller RE, Pothuri B, Ray-Coquard I, Tan DSP, Bellet E, Oaknin A, Ledermann JA. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:833-848. [PMID: 37597580 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A González-Martín
- Department of Medical Oncology and Program in Solid Tumors Cima-Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid and Pamplona, Spain
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - A Leary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - D Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCSS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - R E Miller
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College Hospital, London; Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Pothuri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Bernard and Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University of Singapore (NUS) Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - E Bellet
- ACTO-Alleanza contro il Tumore Ovarico, Milan, Italy
| | - A Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loong HH, Shimizu T, Prawira A, Tan AC, Tran B, Day D, Tan DSP, Ting FIL, Chiu JW, Hui M, Wilson MK, Prasongsook N, Koyama T, Reungwetwattana T, Tan TJ, Heong V, Voon PJ, Park S, Tan IB, Chan SL, Tan DSW. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with metastatic cancer in the Asia-Pacific region: a report from the APODDC working group. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101586. [PMID: 37356359 PMCID: PMC10319859 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Next-generation sequencing (NGS) diagnostics have shown clinical utility in predicting survival benefits in patients with certain cancer types who are undergoing targeted drug therapies. Currently, there are no guidelines or recommendations for the use of NGS in patients with metastatic cancer from an Asian perspective. In this article, we present the Asia-Pacific Oncology Drug Development Consortium (APODDC) recommendations for the clinical use of NGS in metastatic cancers. METHODS The APODDC set up a group of experts in the field of clinical cancer genomics to (i) understand the current NGS landscape for metastatic cancers in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region; (ii) discuss key challenges in the adoption of NGS testing in clinical practice; and (iii) adapt/modify the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines for local use. Nine cancer types [breast cancer (BC), gastric cancer (GC), nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), ovarian cancer (OC), prostate cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer (CRC) as well as cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)] were identified, and the applicability of NGS was evaluated in daily practice and/or clinical research. Asian ethnicity, accessibility of NGS testing, reimbursement, and socioeconomic and local practice characteristics were taken into consideration. RESULTS The APODDC recommends NGS testing in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Routine NGS testing is not recommended in metastatic BC, GC, and NPC as well as cholangiocarcinoma and HCC. The group suggested that patients with epithelial OC may be offered germline and/or somatic genetic testing for BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1), BRCA2, and other OC susceptibility genes. Access to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors is required for NGS to be of clinical utility in prostate cancer. Allele-specific PCR or a small-panel multiplex-gene NGS was suggested to identify key alterations in CRC. CONCLUSION This document offers practical guidance on the clinical utility of NGS in specific cancer indications from an Asian perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H H Loong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - T Shimizu
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Medical Oncology, Wakayama Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan
| | - A Prawira
- Cancer Trials and Research Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - A C Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - B Tran
- Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
| | - D Day
- Department of Oncology, Monash Health and Monash University, Australia
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - F I L Ting
- Department of Medicine, Dr. Pablo O. Torre Memorial Hospital, Bacolod, Philippines
| | - J W Chiu
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, China
| | - M Hui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia
| | - M K Wilson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - N Prasongsook
- Division of Medical Oncology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - T Koyama
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Reungwetwattana
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - T J Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - V Heong
- Department Medical Oncology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - P J Voon
- Radiotherapy and Oncology Department, Hospital Umum Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia
| | - S Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - I B Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - S L Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - D S W Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ngoi NYL, Tan DSP. The role of homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer and its clinical implications: do we need it? ESMO Open 2021; 6:100144. [PMID: 34015643 PMCID: PMC8141874 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The recognition of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as a frequent feature of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) has transformed treatment paradigms. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), developed based on the rationale of synthetic lethality that predicates antitumor efficacy in tumors harboring underlying HRD, now represents an important class of therapy for HGSOC. Recent data have drawn attention to the assessment of homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in HGSOC, leading to increasing debate on the optimal means of defining and evaluating HRD, both genotypically and phenotypically. At present, clinical-grade assays such as myChoice CDx and FoundationOne CDx are approved companion diagnostics which can identify patients with HRD-positive HGSOC by diagnosing a 'genomic scar' reflecting underlying genomic instability. Yet despite the rapid maturation of this field, tumoral HRD status has been recognized to be dynamic over time and with treatment pressure. In practice, this means that restoration of HRR through mechanisms of platinum and PARPi resistance are not adequately represented by genomic scar assays, and contribute toward discordance with clinical PARPi response, or lack-thereof. It is thus critical that HRD testing is optimized to address the controversies of diverse HRD testing methodology, appropriate thresholds for HRD identification, and relevant timepoints for HRD testing, in order to realize the potential for PARPis to maximally benefit patients with HGSOC. Here, we discuss the premise of HRD testing in HGSOC, current methodologies for HRD identification and their performance in the clinic, highlight upcoming strategies, and discuss the challenges faced in moving this field forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Y L Ngoi
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baert T, Ferrero A, Sehouli J, O'Donnell DM, González-Martín A, Joly F, van der Velden J, Blecharz P, Tan DSP, Querleu D, Colombo N, du Bois A, Ledermann JA. The systemic treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer revisited. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:710-725. [PMID: 33675937 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment approaches for relapsed ovarian cancer have evolved over the past decade from a calendar-based decision tree to a patient-oriented biologically driven algorithm. Nowadays, platinum-based chemotherapy should be offered to all patients with a reasonable chance of responding to this therapy. The treatment-free interval for platinum is only one of many factors affecting patients' eligibility for platinum re-treatment. Bevacizumab increases the response to chemotherapy irrespective of the cytotoxic regimen and can be valuable in patients with an urgent need for symptom relief (e.g. pleural effusion, ascites). For patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian cancer, which responds to platinum-based treatment, maintenance therapy with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor can be offered, regardless of the BRCA mutation status. Here we review contemporary decision-making processes in the systemic treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Baert
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - A Ferrero
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - J Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-University hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - D M O'Donnell
- Department of Oncology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A González-Martín
- Medical Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Joly
- Department of Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - J van der Velden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Blecharz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Oncology, M. Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Krakow, Poland
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute of Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - D Querleu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - A du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - J A Ledermann
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lim JSJ, Tan DSP. TRK inhibitors: managing on-target toxicities. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1109-1111. [PMID: 32574723 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J S J Lim
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - D S P Tan
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ngoi NYL, Heong V, Lee XW, Huang YQ, Thian YL, Choo BA, Lim D, Lim YW, Lim SE, Ilancheran A, Soong R, Tan DSP. Tumor molecular profiling of responders and non-responders following pembrolizumab monotherapy in chemotherapy resistant advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2018; 24:1-5. [PMID: 29892689 PMCID: PMC5993533 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2018.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Revised: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimal treatment for advanced cervical cancer after first line chemotherapy remains undefined. Immune checkpoint inhibition with pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) inhibitor, is under investigation. We analyzed the micro-environmental and molecular genetic profile of tumors from 4 patients with metastatic cervical cancer treated with off-label second-line pembrolizumab in an effort to identify predictive biomarkers. All patients received 2 mg/kg of pembrolizumab, 3-weekly until disease progression. Immunohistochemistry(IHC) for PD-1, PD-L1, CD3 and CD8, as well as next generation sequencing (NGS) for 50 cancer-related genes were performed on tumor samples. All patients tolerated treatment well with no discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity. One patient experienced dramatic and prolonged partial response, and remains stable on pembrolizumab with a progression free survival (PFS) of 21 months at the time of reporting of this series. Three patients experienced disease progression as best response. In the exceptional responder, there was no tumoral expression of PD-L1, however, combined positive score (CPS) for PD-L1 was 1 and we identified somatic mutations in ERBB4(R612W), PIK3CA(E542K) and RB1(E365K). In 2 patients, despite progressive disease defined by RECIST v1.1, symptom stabilization on pembrolizumab was observed. The tumors of both patients had PD-1 expression in ≥1% of stromal lymphocytes. All patients with response or clinical benefit had CPS for PD-L1 ≥ 1. NGS revealed PIK3CA mutations in 3 tumors. Pembrolizumab is a promising therapeutic option in advanced cervical cancer. Further evaluation of biomarkers may guide optimal patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Y L Ngoi
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - V Heong
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Republic of Singapore
| | - X W Lee
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - Y Q Huang
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - Y L Thian
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - B A Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - D Lim
- Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - Y W Lim
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - S E Lim
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - A Ilancheran
- Division of Gynecology-Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - R Soong
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Republic of Singapore.,Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Republic of Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tan DSP, Yap TA, Hutka MM, Roxburgh P, Grzybowska E, Gourley C, Gore ME, Kaye SB. Implications of BRCA1and BRCA2 mutations on taxane sensitivity in patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.5063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
9
|
Lambros MBK, Tan DSP, Jones RL, Vatcheva R, Savage K, Tamber N, Fenwick K, Mackay A, Ashworth A, Reis-Filho JS. Genomic profile of a secretory breast cancer with an ETV6-NTRK3 duplication. J Clin Pathol 2009; 62:604-12. [PMID: 19561229 DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2008.059675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secretory breast cancer (SBC) is a rare entity characterised by indolent clinical behaviour, distinctive histological features and the presence of a recurrent chromosomal translocation t(12;15)(p13;q25), leading to the formation of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. AIM To describe the molecular genetic features of a case of SBC which harbours a duplication of the t(12;15) translocation. METHODS Tiling path array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) using in-house-generated probes for ETV6, NTRK3 and the fusion genes, centromeric probes for chromosomes 12 and 15, and a commercially available split-apart ETV6/NTRK3 probe. RESULTS FISH revealed the presence of a duplication of the translocation t(12;15), which resulted from the gain of one copy of the derivative chromosome der(15)t(12;15), retention of one normal copy of both ETV6 and NTRK3 genes and deletion of the derivative chromosome der(12)t(12;15). Consistent with FISH findings, aCGH revealed copy number gains of ETV6 and NTRK3 and deletions encompassing the regions centromeric to ETV6 and telomeric to NTRK3. Additional regions of copy number changes included gains of 10q21, 10q26.3, 12p13.3-p13.31 15q11-q25.3 and 16pq and losses of 6q24.1-q27, 12p13.2-q12 and 15q25.3-q26.3. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a carcinoma has been shown to harbour a duplication of the ETV6-NTRK3 translocation. The presence of an additional copy of the derivative chromosome der(15)t(12;15) coupled with deletion of the other derivative der(12)t(12;15) in the modal population of cancer cells suggests that this was either an early phenomenon or conferred additional growth advantage on neoplastic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M B K Lambros
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The ESR1 gene maps 6q25 and encodes for oestrogen receptor alpha, which has been shown to play a pivotal role in the development of breast and endometrial cancer. It has recently been reported that oestrogen receptor alpha expression may be driven in some cases by ESR1 gene amplification and that this phenomenon may be an early event in breast and endometrial carcinogenesis. Although copy number gains of 6q have been reported by several groups, their prevalence, association with oestrogen receptor alpha expression, and clinical implications have been a matter of controversy. Here we discuss the key issues regarding the methods employed in the identification of ESR1 amplification, and briefly review the current literature and recent controversies on the subject of ESR1 amplification in endometrial and breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S P Tan
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marchiò C, Natrajan R, Shiu KK, Lambros MBK, Rodriguez‐Pinilla SM, Tan DSP, Lord CJ, Hungermann D, Fenwick K, Tamber N, Mackay A, Palacios J, Sapino A, Buerger H, Ashworth A, Reis‐Filho JS. The genomic profile of
HER2
‐amplified breast cancers: the influence of ER status. J Pathol 2008; 216:399-407. [DOI: 10.1002/path.2423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Marchiò
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Turin, Italy
| | - R Natrajan
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - KK Shiu
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - MBK Lambros
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | | | - DSP Tan
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - CJ Lord
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | | | - K Fenwick
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - N Tamber
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - A Mackay
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - J Palacios
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - A Sapino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Turin, Italy
| | - H Buerger
- Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Germany
| | - A Ashworth
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - JS Reis‐Filho
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancer accounts for up to 5-10% of all breast carcinomas. Recent studies have demonstrated that mutations in two high-penetrance genes, namely BRCA1 and BRCA2, are responsible for about 16% of the familial risk of breast cancer. Even though subsequent studies have failed to find another high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility gene, several genes that confer a moderate to low risk of breast cancer development have been identified; moreover, hereditary breast cancer can be part of multiple cancer syndromes. In this review we will focus on the hereditary breast carcinomas caused by mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, Fanconi anaemia (FANC) genes, CHK2 and ATM tumour suppressor genes. We describe the hallmark histological features of these carcinomas compared with non-hereditary breast cancers and show how an accurate histopathological diagnosis may help improve the identification of patients to be screened for mutations. Finally, novel therapeutic approaches to treat patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ line mutations, including cross-linking agents and PARP inhibitors, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S P Tan
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|