Thoracoscopic cryoanalgesia: A new strategy for postoperative pain control in minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair

OBJECTIVE

Recent publications report early discharge and low opioid requirements after minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair treated with bilateral intercostal nerve cryoablation. Our aim is to report our initial experience with this technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients undergoing bilateral thoracoscopic cryoanalgesia during minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair within our institution from September 2018 to March 2019.

TECHNIQUE

A cryoprobe was applied at -70 ºC for 2 minutes each from the 3rd to the 7th intercostal nerves bilaterally under thoracoscopic control. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included. Ninety percent were male, the mean age being 15.2 ± 4.29 years, and the mean weight being 53.6 ± 15.33 kg. The average Haller index was 5.1 ± 2.97, and the mean repair index was 37.6 ± 13.77%. The mean number of implants introduced was 2.55 ± 0.74. The mean duration of cryoanalgesia was 39.9 ± 21.1. No patients received epidural anesthesia. Mean postoperative stay was 1.64 ± 0.73 days. Seventy-one percent of the patients required 1 dose of opioids at the most for postoperative pain control. According to the VAS, the average pain score on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 21 was 2.55, 2.01, 0.5, and 0.06, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral thoracoscopic cryoanalgesia during minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair leads to early discharge and good postoperative pain control in all cases. Cryoanalgesia has become our treatment of choice for pain control in the thoracoscopic repair of pectus excavatum.

Implementation of a direct patient callback system improves compliance for additional breast imaging and early breast cancer detection

6073

Background: Existing patient recall systems usually involve contacting the referring physician who then notifies the patient to schedule a return visit for further imaging. We set out to determine whether a direct patient callback system would improve patient compliance in returning for additional imaging including magnification, spot compression, and ultrasound, and whether that would translate to an improvement in early breast cancer detection. Methods: Beginning on 4/1/2004, we prospectively identified all patients whose screening mammograms were read as having an incomplete assessment that required additional imaging (ACR BIRADS 0). Those patients were contacted directly via telephone to return for additional views. Results: Between 11/1/2002 and 3/31/3004, 1142 patients with incomplete screening mammography were identified and the referring physicians were contacted. 956 of 1142 (84%) patients returned and underwent additional breast imaging. Between 4/1/2004 and 12/31/2005, 1,336 patients with incomplete screening mammography were contacted directly to return for additional imaging. 1,307 of 1,336 (98%) patients returned and underwent additional breast imaging. (p < 0.0001, Fisher’s exact test). 125 of the 1,307 (8.5%) of the subsequent exams were found to be suspicious and biopsy was recommended (ACR BIRADS 4 or 5). Conclusions: Our new system of contacting patients with incomplete mammography has significantly increased our recall rate. Implementation of this system has enabled us to identify those patients whose mammograms are suspicious and ultimately diagnose breast cancer earlier. Direct patient callback has become standard policy and we are recommending this system for all radiology recall examinations.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.