A study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxytocin at elective caesarean delivery

Oxytocin is widely used to prevent atonic postpartum haemorrhage after caesarean delivery. Initial treatment failure rates are high and inadequate dosing may contribute. Excessive doses, however, are associated with serious adverse effects. The pharmacokinetic data from this context are sparse and there is a lack of data in the immediate postpartum minutes after an initiating bolus. The pharmacodynamic data from this context are exclusively from dose-effect studies, with some suggesting that higher doses of oxytocin are required to provide adequate uterine tone in obese compared with non-obese women. We aimed to perform a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study that would facilitate more precise weight-based oxytocin dosing. We measured arterial oxytocin concentration, uterine tone and haemodynamic parameters in 25 women in the first 40 min after exogenous oxytocin administration at elective caesarean delivery. Serum oxytocin concentrations varied considerably between individuals. We constructed a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model of exogenous oxytocin deposition, after its administration with an initiating bolus and a maintenance infusion, at elective caesarean delivery. Body weight was evaluated as a potential covariate but was not included in the model due to lack of statistically significant reduction in the objective function. We calculated the volume of distribution and clearance (mean [coefficient of variation]) as 156.1 l [18%] and 83 ml.s-1 [32%] but found no within-individual correlation between serum oxytocin concentration and uterine tone or haemodynamic parameters. In conclusion, we observed a large variation in serum oxytocin concentrations between individuals receiving similar doses of oxytocin and were unable to establish weight-based dosing of exogenous oxytocin at caesarean delivery. Our findings suggest that future studies on oxytocin pharmacokinetics would need large sample sizes. In the absence of such data, oxytocin dosing should continue to be guided by uterine tone assessments and adjusted according to a strategy based on the best evidence from dose-effect studies.

Oxytocin: at birth and beyond. A systematic review of the long-term effects of peripartum oxytocin

Oxytocin is one of the most commonly used medications during labour and delivery. Recent insights from basic neuroscience research suggest that the uterotonic effects of oxytocin may arguably be trivial when compared with its profound effects on higher-order human behaviour. The purpose of this review is to highlight the potential consequences of manipulating oxytocinergic signalling during the peripartum period and its long-term impact on the maternal-infant dyad. We identified four domains where modulation of oxytocinergic signalling might be consequential: postpartum depression; breastfeeding; neurodevelopment; and chronic pain, and performed a literature search to address the impact of peripartum oxytocin administration. We have shown modest, but inconsistent, evidence linking peripartum oxytocin administration with postpartum depression. Breastfeeding success appeared to be negatively correlated with peripartum oxytocin exposure, perhaps secondary to impaired primitive neonatal reflexes and maternal-infant bonding. The association between perinatal oxytocin exposure and subsequent development of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism in the offspring was weak, but these studies were limited by the lack of information on the cumulative dose. Finally, we identified substantial evidence for analgesic and anti-hypersensitivity effects of oxytocin which might partly explain the low incidence of chronic pain after caesarean birth. Although most data presented here are observational, our review points to a compelling need for robust clinical studies to better dissect the impact of peripartum oxytocin administration, and as stewards of its use, increase the precision with which we administer oxytocin to prevent overuse of the drug.

The association between post-dural puncture headache and needle type during spinal anaesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Post-dural puncture headache is one of the most undesirable complications of spinal anaesthesia. Previous pairwise meta-analyses have either compared groups of needles or ranked individual needles based on the pooled incidence of post-dural puncture headache. These analyses have suggested both the gauge and needle tip design as risk-factors, but failed to provide an unbiased comparison of individual needles. This network meta-analysis compared the odds of post-dural puncture headache with needles of varying gauge and tip design. We searched randomised controlled trials in medical databases. The primary outcome measure of the network meta-analysis was the incidence of post-dural puncture headache. Secondary outcomes were procedural failure, backache and non-specific headache. Overall, we compared 11 different needles in 61 randomised controlled trials including a total of 14,961 participants. The probability of post-dural puncture headache and procedural failure was lowest with 26-G atraumatic needles. The 29-G cutting needle was more likely than three atraumatic needles to have the lowest odds of post-dural puncture headache, although with increased risk of procedural failure. The probability rankings were: 26 atraumatic > 27 atraumatic > 29 cutting > 24 atraumatic > 22 atraumatic > 25 atraumatic > 23 cutting > 22 cutting > 25 cutting > 27 cutting = 26 cutting for post-dural puncture headache; and 26 atraumatic > 25 cutting > 22 cutting > 24 atraumatic > 22 atraumatic > 25 atraumatic > 26 cutting > 29 cutting > 27 atraumatic = 27 cutting for procedural success. Meta-regression by type of surgical population (obstetric/non-obstetric) and participant position (sitting/lateral) did not alter these rank orders. This analysis provides an unbiased comparison of individual needles that does not support the use of simple rules when selecting the optimal needle. The 26-G atraumatic needle is most likely to enable successful insertion while avoiding post-dural puncture headache but, where this is not available, our probability rankings can help clinicians select the best of available options.