1
|
Rogers DWO. Minimum phantom size for megavoltage photon beam reference dosimetry. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38669481 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Water phantoms are required to perform reference dosimetry and beam quality measurements but there are no published studies about the size requirements for such phantoms. PURPOSE To investigate, using Monte Carlo techniques, the size requirements for water phantoms used in reference dosimetry and/or to measure the beam quality specifiers% d d ( 10 ) x $\%dd(10)_{\sf x}$ andT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ . METHODS The EGSnrc application DOSXYZnrc is used to calculateD ( 10 ) $D(10)$ , the dose per incident fluence at 10 cm depth in a water phantom irradiated by incident10 × 10 cm 2 $10\,\times \,10 \, {\rm {cm}}^{2}$ beams of60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$ or 6 MV photons. The water phantom dimensions are varied from30 × 30 × 40 cm 3 $30 \,\times \, 30 \,\times \, 40 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ to15 × 15 × 22 cm 3 $15 \,\times \, 15 \,\times \, 22 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ and occasionally smaller. The% d d ( 10 ) x $\%dd(10)_{\sf x}$ andT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values are also calculated with care being taken to distinguishT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ results when using Method A (changing depth of water in phantom) and Method B (moving entire phantom). Typical statistical uncertainties are 0.03%. RESULTS Phantom dimensions have only minor effects for phantoms larger than20 × 20 × 25 cm 3 $20 \,\times \, 20 \,\times \, 25 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ . A table of corrections to the dose at 10 cm depth in10 × 10 cm 2 $10 \,\times \, 10 \, {\rm {cm}}^{2}$ beams of60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$ or 6 MV photons are provided and range from no correction to 0.75% for a60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$ beam incident on a20 × 20 × 15 cm 3 $20 \,\times \, 20 \,\times \, 15 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ phantom. There can be distinct differences in theT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values measured using Method A or Method B, especially for smaller phantoms. It is explicitly demonstrated that, within ± $\pm$ 0.15%,T P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values for a30 × 30 × 30 cm 3 $30 \,\times \, 30 \,\times \, 30 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ phantom measured using Method A or B are independent of source detector distance between 40 and 200 cm. CONCLUSIONS The phantom sizes recommended in the TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 reference dosimetry protocols are adequate for accurate reference dosimetry and in some cases are even conservative. Correction factors are necessary for accurate measurement of the dose at 10 cm depth in smaller phantoms and these factors are provided. Very accurate beam quality specifiers are not required for reference dosimetry itself, but for specifying beam stability and characteristics it is important to specify phantom sizes and also the method used forT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D W O Rogers
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Safigholi H, Chamberland MJP, Taylor REP, Martinov MP, Rogers DWO, Thomson RM. Update of the CLRP Monte Carlo TG-43 parameter database for high-energy brachytherapy sources. Med Phys 2023; 50:1928-1941. [PMID: 36542404 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To update and extend version 2 of the Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) TG-43 dosimetry database (CLRP_TG43v2) for high-energy (HE, ≥50 keV) brachytherapy sources (1 169 Yb, 23 192 Ir, 5 137 Cs, and 4 60 Co) using egs_brachy, an open-source EGSnrc application. A comprehensive dataset of TG-43 parameters is compiled, including detailed source descriptions, dose-rate constants, radial dose functions, 1D and 2D anisotropy functions, along-away dose-rate tables, Primary and Scatter Separated (PSS) dose tables, and mean photon energies escaping each source. The database also documents the source models which are freely distributed with egs_brachy. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS Datasets are calculated after a recoding of the source geometries using the egs++ geometry package and its egs_brachy extensions. Air kerma per history is calculated in a 10 × 10 × $\,{\times}\, 10\,{\times}\,$ 0.05 cm3 voxel located 100 cm from the source along the transverse axis and then corrected for the lateral and thickness dimensions of the scoring voxel to give the air kerma on the central axis at a point 100 cm from the source's mid-point. Full-scatter water phantoms with varying voxel resolutions in cylindrical coordinates are used for dose calculations. Most data (except for 60 Co) are based on the assumption of charged particle equilibrium and ignore the potentially large effects of electron transport very close to the source and dose from initial beta particles. These effects are evaluated for four representative sources. For validation, data are compared to those from CLRP_TG43v1 and published data. DATA FORMAT AND ACCESS Data are available at https://physics.carleton.ca/clrp/egs_brachy/seed_database_v2 or http://doi.org/10.22215/clrp/tg43v2 including in Excel (.xlsx) spreadsheets, and are presented graphically in comparisons to previously published data for each source. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS The CLRP_TG43v2 database has applications in research, dosimetry, and brachytherapy planning. This comprehensive update provides the medical physics community with more precise and in some cases more accurate Monte Carlo (MC) TG-43 dose calculation parameters, as well as fully benchmarked and described source models which are distributed with egs_brachy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Habib Safigholi
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP), Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc J P Chamberland
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP), Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Randle E P Taylor
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP), Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin P Martinov
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP), Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - D W O Rogers
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP), Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rowan M Thomson
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP), Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Safigholi H, Chamberland MJP, Taylor REP, Allen CH, Martinov MP, Rogers DWO, Thomson RM. Update of the CLRP TG‐43 parameter database for low‐energy brachytherapy sources. Med Phys 2020; 47:4656-4669. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Habib Safigholi
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Marc J. P. Chamberland
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Randle E. P. Taylor
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Christian H. Allen
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Martin P. Martinov
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - D. W. O. Rogers
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Rowan M. Thomson
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE to elucidate the effects of multiple scattering and energy-loss straggling on electron beams slowing down in materials. METHODS EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations are done using a purpose-written user-code. RESULTS Plots are presented of the primary electron's energy as a function of pathlength for 20 MeV electrons incident on water and tantalum as are plots of the overall distribution of pathlengths as the 20 MeV electrons slow down under various Monte Carlo scenarios in water and tantalum. The distributions range from 1 % to 135 % of the CSDA range in water and from 1 % to 186 % in tantalum. The effects of energy-loss straggling on energy spectra at depth and electron fluence at depth are also presented. CONCLUSIONS The role of energy-loss straggling and multiple scattering are shown to play a significant role in the range straggling which determines the dose fall-off region in electron beam dose vs depth curves and a significant role in the energy distributions as a function of depth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D W O Rogers
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Physics Dept, Carleton University, Ottawa K1S 5B6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rogers DWO, Townson RW. On calculating kerma, collision kerma and radiative yields. Med Phys 2019; 46:5173-5184. [PMID: 31361030 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the relationships between dose (D), kerma (K), and collision kerma ( K col ) in photon beams and to investigate total radiative yields for electrons and positrons as a function of energy. To do this accurately required calculating collision kerma directly as a function of position in a phantom and making changes to the EGSnrc package (including DOSRZnrc and g applications). METHODS Changes were made to the EGSnrc system to allow the user to distinguish events according to their initiating process, most importantly relaxation particles initiated by electron impact ionization as opposed to initiated by photons, especially those events depositing energy below energy cutoffs after relaxation events. Appropriate changes were made to the applications DOSRZnrc and g and a new application, DOSRZnrcKcol, was written. RESULTS The modified codes are much more robust against changes in simulation parameters such as ECUT and AE and whether or not electron impact ionization is included in the simulation. The radiative yields for electrons generally differ from values in ICRU Report 371 (1984) which only account for radiative losses due to bremsstrahlung. The Monte Carlo calculated g(brems) values are generally greater than the ICRU 37 values due to energy-loss straggling. Plots of D, K and K col vs depth in megavoltage photon beams show that some "conventional wisdom" does not hold in general (e.g., D is not always greater than K past D max ) and in general at 10 cm depth it is found that D≈K and D > K col . The beam radius at which D / K col reaches its saturation value depends strongly on the threshold used to define reaching saturation and is generally greater than the radius for lateral charged particle equilibrium used in the TRS-483 Code of Practice for small beam dosimetry2 (Palmans et al, Med Phys. 2018;45:e1123-e1145). CONCLUSIONS The changes to EGSnrc make kerma calculations more accurate but previous calculations with electron impact ionization turned off gave close to correct results. The application DOSRZnrcKcol makes calculating collision kerma more efficient and avoids various approximations used in the past although those approximations are shown to be justified. Including energy-loss straggling when calculating bremsstrahlung radiation yield increases the value. Fluorescence losses and annihilation in flight further increase the radiation yield of electrons and positrons. Results demonstrate the effects of EGSnrc using electron bremsstrahlung production cross sections for positrons and failing to model positron impact ionization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D W O Rogers
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Physics Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Reid W Townson
- Metrology Research Centre, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, K1A OR6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thomson RM, Taylor REP, Chamberland MJP, Rogers DWO. Reply to Comment on ‘egs_brachy: a versatile and fast Monte Carlo code for brachytherapy’. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:038002. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9ea2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
7
|
Malkov VN, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality. Med Phys 2018; 45:908-925. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Victor N. Malkov
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics; Physics Dept; Carleton University; Ottawa ON Canada
| | - D. W. O. Rogers
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics; Physics Dept; Carleton University; Ottawa ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sechopoulos I, Rogers DWO, Bazalova-Carter M, Bolch WE, Heath EC, McNitt-Gray MF, Sempau J, Williamson JF. RECORDS: improved Reporting of montE CarlO RaDiation transport Studies: Report of the AAPM Research Committee Task Group 268. Med Phys 2017; 45:e1-e5. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Sechopoulos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine; Radboud University Medical Center; Nijmegen the Netherlands
- Dutch Expert Centre for Screening (LRCB); Wijchenseweg 101 Nijmegen SW 6538 The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wesley E. Bolch
- Department of Biomedical Engineering; University of Florida; Gainesville FL USA
| | | | - Michael F. McNitt-Gray
- Department of Radiological Sciences; David Geffen School of Medicine; University of California, Los Angeles; Los Angeles USA
| | - Josep Sempau
- Physics Department and Institute of Energy Technologies; Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya; Barcelona Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE The development of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) necessitates accurate Monte Carlo (MC) models of ion chambers for computing ion chamber corrections to compensate for the presence of the magnetic field. This study evaluates the sensitivity of the ion chamber dose response in a magnetic field on the collection volume used in the MC simulation. METHODS The EGSnrc system's egs_chamber application is used with a recently developed and validated magnetic field transport code. The calculated dose to the sensitive volume of the chamber per unit incident photon fluence, normalized to that at 0 T, is evaluated as a function of magnetic field for the PTW 30013, PTW 31006, PTW 31010, Exradin A12S, and Exradin A1SL chambers. The sensitive region is varied by excluding the volume corresponding to either 0, 0.5, or 1 mm of distance away from the stem. The photon field, magnetic field, and ion chamber are all oriented perpendicular to each other as in the majority of published experimental works. RESULTS The calculations for a Co-60 source demonstrate that variations from the 0 mm simulations are on the order of several percent with a maximum deviation, occurring at 0.5 T, of 1.75 ± 0.03% and 3.39 ± 0.06% for the 0.5 mm or 1 mm simulations, respectively, for a 0.057 cm3 A1SL chamber. Larger volume chambers showed smaller, but still non-negligible, variations. Simulations of the A1SL chamber with a 7 MV photon source, corresponding to the Elekta MR-linac machine, demonstrate that the effect is slightly reduced but still persists with a maximum deviation of 1.97 ± 0.08% for the 1 mm reduction. CONCLUSIONS Usually, the geometric sensitive volume of the ion chamber is used in MC calculation as a substitute for the potentially unknown, smaller, true collection volume (governed by the complex electric field distribution inside the chamber). The calculations in this study demonstrate that even a small variation in simulated volume can lead to fairly large variations in the MC calculated ion chamber response in a magnetic field. This is an important effect that must be addressed to ensure proper calibration of MRgRT machines using MC ion chamber correction factors. This effect may play a role, even where there is no magnetic field, in small-field dosimetry when volume averaging effect are important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor N Malkov
- Department of Physics, Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - D W O Rogers
- Department of Physics, Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chamberland MJP, Taylor REP, Rogers DWO, Thomson RM. egs_brachy: a versatile and fast Monte Carlo code for brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:8214-8231. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/23/8214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
11
|
Sechopoulos I, Ali ESM, Badal A, Badano A, Boone JM, Kyprianou IS, Mainegra-Hing E, McMillan KL, McNitt-Gray MF, Rogers DWO, Samei E, Turner AC. Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195. Med Phys 2016; 42:5679-91. [PMID: 26429242 DOI: 10.1118/1.4928676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of Monte Carlo simulations in diagnostic medical imaging research is widespread due to its flexibility and ability to estimate quantities that are challenging to measure empirically. However, any new Monte Carlo simulation code needs to be validated before it can be used reliably. The type and degree of validation required depends on the goals of the research project, but, typically, such validation involves either comparison of simulation results to physical measurements or to previously published results obtained with established Monte Carlo codes. The former is complicated due to nuances of experimental conditions and uncertainty, while the latter is challenging due to typical graphical presentation and lack of simulation details in previous publications. In addition, entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations in general involves a steep learning curve. It is not a simple task to learn how to program and interpret a Monte Carlo simulation, even when using one of the publicly available code packages. This Task Group report provides a common reference for benchmarking Monte Carlo simulations across a range of Monte Carlo codes and simulation scenarios. In the report, all simulation conditions are provided for six different Monte Carlo simulation cases that involve common x-ray based imaging research areas. The results obtained for the six cases using four publicly available Monte Carlo software packages are included in tabular form. In addition to a full description of all simulation conditions and results, a discussion and comparison of results among the Monte Carlo packages and the lessons learned during the compilation of these results are included. This abridged version of the report includes only an introductory description of the six cases and a brief example of the results of one of the cases. This work provides an investigator the necessary information to benchmark his/her Monte Carlo simulation software against the reference cases included here before performing his/her own novel research. In addition, an investigator entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations can use these descriptions and results as a self-teaching tool to ensure that he/she is able to perform a specific simulation correctly. Finally, educators can assign these cases as learning projects as part of course objectives or training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Sechopoulos
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
| | - Elsayed S M Ali
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Andreu Badal
- Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993-0002
| | - Aldo Badano
- Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993-0002
| | - John M Boone
- Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95817
| | | | | | - Kyle L McMillan
- Department of Biomedical Physics and Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
| | - Michael F McNitt-Gray
- Department of Biomedical Physics and Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
| | - D W O Rogers
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27705
| | - Adam C Turner
- Department of Biomedical Physics and Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Rodriguez M, Rogers DWO. Effect of improved TLD dosimetry on the determination of dose rate constants for (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds. Med Phys 2015; 41:114301. [PMID: 25370677 DOI: 10.1118/1.4895003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To more accurately account for the relative intrinsic energy dependence and relative absorbed-dose energy dependence of TLDs when used to measure dose rate constants (DRCs) for (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds, to thereby establish revised "measured values" for all seeds and compare the revised values with Monte Carlo and consensus values. METHODS The relative absorbed-dose energy dependence, f(rel), for TLDs and the phantom correction, Pphant, are calculated for (125)I and (103)Pd seeds using the EGSnrc BrachyDose and DOSXYZnrc codes. The original energy dependence and phantom corrections applied to DRC measurements are replaced by calculated (f(rel))(-1) and Pphant values for 24 different seed models. By comparing the modified measured DRCs to the MC values, an appropriate relative intrinsic energy dependence, kbq (rel), is determined. The new Pphant values and relative absorbed-dose sensitivities, SAD (rel), calculated as the product of (f(rel))(-1) and (kbq (rel))(-1), are used to individually revise the measured DRCs for comparison with Monte Carlo calculated values and TG-43U1 or TG-43U1S1 consensus values. RESULTS In general, f(rel) is sensitive to the energy spectra and models of the brachytherapy seeds. Values may vary up to 8.4% among (125)I and (103)Pd seed models and common TLD shapes. Pphant values depend primarily on the isotope used. Deduced (kbq (rel))(-1) values are 1.074 ± 0.015 and 1.084 ± 0.026 for (125)I and (103)Pd seeds, respectively. For (1 mm)(3) chips, this implies an overall absorbed-dose sensitivity relative to (60)Co or 6 MV calibrations of 1.51 ± 1% and 1.47 ± 2% for (125)I and (103)Pd seeds, respectively, as opposed to the widely used value of 1.41. Values of Pphant calculated here have much lower statistical uncertainties than literature values, but systematic uncertainties from density and composition uncertainties are significant. Using these revised values with the literature's DRC measurements, the average discrepancies between revised measured values and Monte Carlo values are 1.2% and 0.2% for (125)I and (103)Pd seeds, respectively, compared to average discrepancies for the original measured values of 4.8%. On average, the revised measured values are 4.3% and 5.9% lower than the original measured values for (103)Pd and (125)I seeds, respectively. The average of revised DRCs and Monte Carlo values is 3.8% and 2.8% lower for (125)I and (103)Pd seeds, respectively, than the consensus values in TG-43U1 or TG-43U1S1. CONCLUSIONS This work shows that f(rel) is TLD shape and seed model dependent suggesting a need to update the generalized energy response dependence, i.e., relative absorbed-dose sensitivity, measured 25 years ago and applied often to DRC measurements of (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds. The intrinsic energy dependence for LiF TLDs deduced here is consistent with previous dosimetry studies and emphasizes the need to revise the DRC consensus values reported by TG-43U1 or TG-43U1S1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rodriguez
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - D W O Rogers
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Ali ESM, Spencer B, McEwen MR, Rogers DWO. Towards a quantitative, measurement-based estimate of the uncertainty in photon mass attenuation coefficients at radiation therapy energies. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60:1641-54. [PMID: 25622289 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/4/1641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In this study, a quantitative estimate is derived for the uncertainty in the XCOM photon mass attenuation coefficients in the energy range of interest to external beam radiation therapy-i.e. 100 keV (orthovoltage) to 25 MeV-using direct comparisons of experimental data against Monte Carlo models and theoretical XCOM data. Two independent datasets are used. The first dataset is from our recent transmission measurements and the corresponding EGSnrc calculations (Ali et al 2012 Med. Phys. 39 5990-6003) for 10-30 MV photon beams from the research linac at the National Research Council Canada. The attenuators are graphite and lead, with a total of 140 data points and an experimental uncertainty of ∼0.5% (k = 1). An optimum energy-independent cross section scaling factor that minimizes the discrepancies between measurements and calculations is used to deduce cross section uncertainty. The second dataset is from the aggregate of cross section measurements in the literature for graphite and lead (49 experiments, 288 data points). The dataset is compared to the sum of the XCOM data plus the IAEA photonuclear data. Again, an optimum energy-independent cross section scaling factor is used to deduce the cross section uncertainty. Using the average result from the two datasets, the energy-independent cross section uncertainty estimate is 0.5% (68% confidence) and 0.7% (95% confidence). The potential for energy-dependent errors is discussed. Photon cross section uncertainty is shown to be smaller than the current qualitative 'envelope of uncertainty' of the order of 1-2%, as given by Hubbell (1999 Phys. Med. Biol 44 R1-22).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S M Ali
- Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Muir BR, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types. Med Phys 2014; 41:111701. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4893915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
17
|
Muir BR, McEwen MR, Rogers DWO. Determination of relative ion chamber calibration coefficients from depth-ionization measurements in clinical electron beams. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59:5953-69. [PMID: 25211012 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/19/5953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A method is presented to obtain ion chamber calibration coefficients relative to secondary standard reference chambers in electron beams using depth-ionization measurements. Results are obtained as a function of depth and average electron energy at depth in 4, 8, 12 and 18 MeV electron beams from the NRC Elekta Precise linac. The PTW Roos, Scanditronix NACP-02, PTW Advanced Markus and NE 2571 ion chambers are investigated. The challenges and limitations of the method are discussed. The proposed method produces useful data at shallow depths. At depths past the reference depth, small shifts in positioning or drifts in the incident beam energy affect the results, thereby providing a built-in test of incident electron energy drifts and/or chamber set-up. Polarity corrections for ion chambers as a function of average electron energy at depth agree with literature data. The proposed method produces results consistent with those obtained using the conventional calibration procedure while gaining much more information about the behavior of the ion chamber with similar data acquisition time. Measurement uncertainties in calibration coefficients obtained with this method are estimated to be less than 0.5%. These results open up the possibility of using depth-ionization measurements to yield chamber ratios which may be suitable for primary standards-level dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Muir
- Measurement Science and Standards, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0R6, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
M. Ali ES, Buchenberg W, O. Rogers DW. Sci-Fri PM: Dosimetry-05: Megavoltage electron backscatter: EGSnrc results versus 21 experiments. Med Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4894960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
19
|
Muir BR, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers. Med Phys 2013; 40:121722. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4829577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
20
|
Ali ESM, Rogers DWO. An improved physics-based approach for unfolding megavoltage bremsstrahlung spectra using transmission analysis. Med Phys 2013; 39:1663-75. [PMID: 22380398 DOI: 10.1118/1.3687164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a physics-based approach to improve the accuracy and robustness of the ill-conditioned problem of unfolding megavoltage bremsstrahlung spectra from transmission data. METHODS Spectra are specified using a rigorously-benchmarked functional form. Since ion chambers are the typical detector used in transmission measurements, the energy response of a Farmer chamber is calculated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code, and the effect of approximating the energy response on the accuracy of the unfolded spectra is studied. A proposal is introduced to enhance spectral sensitivity by combining transmission data measured with multiple detectors of different energy response and by combining data from multiple attenuating materials. Monte Carlo methods are developed to correct for nonideal exponential attenuation (e.g., scatter effects and secondary attenuation). The performance of the proposed methods is evaluated for a diverse set of validated clinical spectra (3.5-25 MV) using analytical transmission data with simulated experimental noise. RESULTS The approximations commonly used in previous studies for the ion-chamber energy response lead to significant errors in the unfolded spectra. Of the configurations studied, the one with best spectral sensitivity is to measure four full transmission curves using separate low-Z and high-Z attenuators in conjunction with two detectors of different energy response (the authors propose a Farmer-type ion chamber, once with a low-Z, and once with a high-Z buildup cap material), then to feed the data simultaneously to the unfolding algorithm. Deviations from ideal exponential attenuation are as much as 1.5% for the smallest transmission signals, and the proposed methods properly correct for those deviations. The transmission data with enhanced spectral sensitivity, combined with the accurate and flexible spectral functional form, lead to robust unfolding without requiring a priori knowledge of the spectrum. Compared with the commonly-used methods, the accuracy is improved for the unfolded spectra and for the unfolded mean incident electron kinetic energy by at least factors of three and four, respectively. With simulated experimental noise and a lowest transmission of 1%, the unfolded energy fluence spectra agree with the original spectra with a normalized root-mean-square deviation, %Δ(ψ), of 2.3%. The unfolded mean incident electron kinetic energies agree, on average, with the original values within 1.4%. A lowest transmission of only 10% still allows unfolding with %Δ(ψ) of 3.3%. CONCLUSIONS In the presence of realistic experimental noise, the proposed approach significantly improves the accuracy and robustness of the spectral unfolding problem for all therapy and MV imaging beams of clinical interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S M Ali
- Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rogers DWO. Comment on ‘Monte Carlo simulation on a gold nanoparticle irradiated by electron beams’. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:1999-2001; discussion 2003-5. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/6/1999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
22
|
|
23
|
Ali ESM, McEwen MR, Rogers DWO. Detailed high-accuracy megavoltage transmission measurements: a sensitive experimental benchmark of EGSnrc. Med Phys 2012; 39:5990-6003. [PMID: 23039637 DOI: 10.1118/1.4745561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There are three goals for this study: (a) to perform detailed megavoltage transmission measurements in order to identify the factors that affect the measurement accuracy, (b) to use the measured data as a benchmark for the EGSnrc system in order to identify the computational limiting factors, and (c) to provide data for others to benchmark Monte Carlo codes. METHODS Transmission measurements are performed at the National Research Council Canada on a research linac whose incident electron parameters are independently known. Automated transmission measurements are made on-axis, down to a transmission value of ∼1.7%, for eight beams between 10 MV (the lowest stable MV beam on the linac) and 30 MV, using fully stopping Be, Al, and Pb bremsstrahlung targets and no fattening filters. To diversify energy differentiation, data are acquired for each beam using low-Z and high-Z attenuators (C and Pb) and Farmer chambers with low-Z and high-Z buildup caps. Experimental corrections are applied for beam drifts (2%), polarity (2.5% typical maximum, 6% extreme), ion recombination (0.2%), leakage (0.3%), and room scatter (0.8%)-the values in parentheses are the largest corrections applied. The experimental setup and the detectors are modeled using EGSnrc, with the newly added photonuclear attenuation included (up to a 5.6% effect). A detailed sensitivity analysis is carried out for the measured and calculated transmission data. RESULTS The developed experimental protocol allows for transmission measurements with 0.4% uncertainty on the smallest signals. Suggestions for accurate transmission measurements are provided. Measurements and EGSnrc calculations agree typically within 0.2% for the sensitivity of the transmission values to the detector details, to the bremsstrahlung target material, and to the incident electron energy. Direct comparison of the measured and calculated transmission data shows agreement better than 2% for C (3.4% for the 10 MV beam) and typically better than 1% for Pb. The differences can be explained by acceptable photon cross section changes of ≤0.4%. CONCLUSIONS Accurate transmission measurements require accounting for a number of influence quantities which, if ignored, can collectively introduce errors larger than 10%. Accurate transmission calculations require the use of the most accurate data and physics options available in EGSnrc, particularly the more accurate bremsstrahlung angular sampling option and the newly added modeling of photonuclear attenuation. Comparison between measurements and calculations implies that EGSnrc is accurate within 0.2% for relative ion chamber response calculations. Photon cross section uncertainties are the ultimate limiting factor for the accuracy of the calculated transmission data (Monte Carlo or analytical).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S M Ali
- Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chiu-Tsao ST, Astrahan MA, Finger PT, Followill DS, Meigooni AS, Melhus CS, Mourtada F, Napolitano ME, Nath R, Rivard MJ, Rogers DWO, Thomson RM. Dosimetry of (125)I and (103)Pd COMS eye plaques for intraocular tumors: report of Task Group 129 by the AAPM and ABS. Med Phys 2012; 39:6161-84. [PMID: 23039655 DOI: 10.1118/1.4749933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Dosimetry of eye plaques for ocular tumors presents unique challenges in brachytherapy. The challenges in accurate dosimetry are in part related to the steep dose gradient in the tumor and critical structures that are within millimeters of radioactive sources. In most clinical applications, calculations of dose distributions around eye plaques assume a homogenous water medium and full scatter conditions. Recent Monte Carlo (MC)-based eye-plaque dosimetry simulations have demonstrated that the perturbation effects of heterogeneous materials in eye plaques, including the gold-alloy backing and Silastic insert, can be calculated with reasonable accuracy. Even additional levels of complexity introduced through the use of gold foil "seed-guides" and custom-designed plaques can be calculated accurately using modern MC techniques. Simulations accounting for the aforementioned complexities indicate dose discrepancies exceeding a factor of ten to selected critical structures compared to conventional dose calculations. Task Group 129 was formed to review the literature; re-examine the current dosimetry calculation formalism; and make recommendations for eye-plaque dosimetry, including evaluation of brachytherapy source dosimetry parameters and heterogeneity correction factors. A literature review identified modern assessments of dose calculations for Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) design plaques, including MC analyses and an intercomparison of treatment planning systems (TPS) detailing differences between homogeneous and heterogeneous plaque calculations using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) TG-43U1 brachytherapy dosimetry formalism and MC techniques. This review identified that a commonly used prescription dose of 85 Gy at 5 mm depth in homogeneous medium delivers about 75 Gy and 69 Gy at the same 5 mm depth for specific (125)I and (103)Pd sources, respectively, when accounting for COMS plaque heterogeneities. Thus, the adoption of heterogeneous dose calculation methods in clinical practice would result in dose differences >10% and warrant a careful evaluation of the corresponding changes in prescription doses. Doses to normal ocular structures vary with choice of radionuclide, plaque location, and prescription depth, such that further dosimetric evaluations of the adoption of MC-based dosimetry methods are needed. The AAPM and American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommend that clinical medical physicists should make concurrent estimates of heterogeneity-corrected delivered dose using the information in this report's tables to prepare for brachytherapy TPS that can account for material heterogeneities and for a transition to heterogeneity-corrected prescriptive goals. It is recommended that brachytherapy TPS vendors include material heterogeneity corrections in their systems and take steps to integrate planned plaque localization and image guidance. In the interim, before the availability of commercial MC-based brachytherapy TPS, it is recommended that clinical medical physicists use the line-source approximation in homogeneous water medium and the 2D AAPM TG-43U1 dosimetry formalism and brachytherapy source dosimetry parameter datasets for treatment planning calculations. Furthermore, this report includes quality management program recommendations for eye-plaque brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ali ESM, McEwen MR, Rogers DWO. Unfolding linac photon spectra and incident electron energies from experimental transmission data, with direct independent validation. Med Phys 2012; 39:6585-96. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4754301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
26
|
Muir BR, McEwen MR, Rogers DWO. TU-A-BRB-11: A New Method for the Measurement of Reference Dosimetric Quantities in Electron Beams. Med Phys 2012. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4735868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
27
|
Muir BR, McEwen MR, Rogers DWO. Beam quality conversion factors for parallel-plate ionization chambers in MV photon beams. Med Phys 2012; 39:1618-31. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3687864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
28
|
|
29
|
Sutherland JGH, Thomson RM, Rogers DWO. Changes in dose with segmentation of breast tissues in Monte Carlo calculations for low-energy brachytherapy. Med Phys 2011; 38:4858-65. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3613167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
30
|
|
31
|
Ali ESM, McEwen MR, Rogers DWO. TH-E-BRC-09: Beyond Self-Consistency in Beam Commissioning: Determination of True Linac Spectra. Med Phys 2011. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3613577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
32
|
Sutherland JGH, Thomson RM, Rogers DWO. SU-E-T-696: The Need for Segmentation of Breast Tissue in Monte Carlo Calculations for Low-Energy Brachytherapy. Med Phys 2011. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3612658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
33
|
Rivard MJ, Chiu-Tsao ST, Finger PT, Meigooni AS, Melhus CS, Mourtada F, Napolitano ME, Rogers DWO, Thomson RM, Nath R. Comparison of dose calculation methods for brachytherapy of intraocular tumors. Med Phys 2011; 38:306-16. [PMID: 21361199 DOI: 10.1118/1.3523614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate dosimetric differences among several clinical treatment planning systems (TPS) and Monte Carlo (MC) codes for brachytherapy of intraocular tumors using 125I or 103Pd plaques, and to evaluate the impact on the prescription dose of the adoption of MC codes and certain versions of a TPS (Plaque Simulator with optional modules). METHODS Three clinical brachytherapy TPS capable of intraocular brachytherapy treatment planning and two MC codes were compared. The TPS investigated were Pinnacle v8.0dp1, BrachyVision v8.1, and Plaque Simulator v5.3.9, all of which use the AAPM TG-43 formalism in water. The Plaque Simulator software can also handle some correction factors from MC simulations. The MC codes used are MCNP5 v1.40 and BrachyDose/EGSnrc. Using these TPS and MC codes, three types of calculations were performed: homogeneous medium with point sources (for the TPS only, using the 1D TG-43 dose calculation formalism); homogeneous medium with line sources (TPS with 2D TG-43 dose calculation formalism and MC codes); and plaque heterogeneity-corrected line sources (Plaque Simulator with modified 2D TG-43 dose calculation formalism and MC codes). Comparisons were made of doses calculated at points-of-interest on the plaque central-axis and at off-axis points of clinical interest within a standardized model of the right eye. RESULTS For the homogeneous water medium case, agreement was within approximately 2% for the point- and line-source models when comparing between TPS and between TPS and MC codes, respectively. For the heterogeneous medium case, dose differences (as calculated using the MC codes and Plaque Simulator) differ by up to 37% on the central-axis in comparison to the homogeneous water calculations. A prescription dose of 85 Gy at 5 mm depth based on calculations in a homogeneous medium delivers 76 Gy and 67 Gy for specific 125I and 103Pd sources, respectively, when accounting for COMS-plaque heterogeneities. For off-axis points-of-interest, dose differences approached factors of 7 and 12 at some positions for 125I and 103Pd, respectively. There was good agreement (approximately 3%) among MC codes and Plaque Simulator results when appropriate parameters calculated using MC codes were input into Plaque Simulator. Plaque Simulator and MC users are perhaps at risk of overdosing patients up to 20% if heterogeneity corrections are used and the prescribed dose is not modified appropriately. CONCLUSIONS Agreement within 2% was observed among conventional brachytherapy TPS and MC codes for intraocular brachytherapy dose calculations in a homogeneous water environment. In general, the magnitude of dose errors incurred by ignoring the effect of the plaque backing and Silastic insert (i.e., by using the TG-43 approach) increased with distance from the plaque's central-axis. Considering the presence of material heterogeneities in a typical eye plaque, the best method in this study for dose calculations is a verified MC simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
|
36
|
Thomson RM, Yegin G, Taylor REP, Sutherland JGH, Rogers DWO. Sci-Sat AM(2): Brachy - 05: Fast Monte Carlo Dose Calculations for Brachytherapy with BrachyDose. Med Phys 2010. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3476217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
37
|
Muir BR, Rogers DWO. Sci-Fri PM: Delivery - 07: Analysis of Systematic Uncertainties in Monte Carlo Calculated Beam Quality Conversion Factors. Med Phys 2010. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3476195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
38
|
Ali ESM, McEwen M, Rogers DWO. Sci-Thur PM: YIS - 01: Computational and Experimental Methods to Address the Limitations of Reconstructing Linac Photon Spectra from Transmission Measurements. Med Phys 2010. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3476096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
39
|
Thomson RM, Rogers DWO. Re-evaluation of the product of (W/e)airand the graphite to air stopping-power ratio for60Co air kerma standards. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:3577-95. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
40
|
Abstract
PURPOSE The absorbed-dose energy dependence of GAFCHROMIC EBT and EBT2 film irradiated in photon beams is studied to understand the shape of the curves and the physics behind them. METHODS The absorbed-dose energy dependence is calculated using the EGSnrc-based EGS_chamber and DOSRZnrc codes by calculating the ratio of dose to water to dose to active film layers at photon energies ranging from 3 keV to 18 MeV. These data are compared to the mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and the restricted stopping power ratios of water to active film materials as well as to previous experimental results. RESULTS In the photon energy range of 100 keV to 18 MeV the absorbed-dose energy dependence is found to be energy independent within +/- 0.6%. However, below 100 keV, the absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT varies by approximately 10% due to changes in mass energy absorption coefficient ratios of water to film materials, as well as an increase in the number of electrons being created and scattered in the central surface layer of the film. Results are found to disagree with previous experimental studies suggesting the possibility of an intrinsic energy dependence at lower photon energies. For EBT2 film the absorbed-dose energy dependence at low photon energies varies by 50% or 10% depending on the manufacturing lot due to changes in the ratio of mass energy absorption coefficients of the active emulsion layers to water. CONCLUSIONS Caution is recommended when using GAFCHROMIC EBT/EBT2 films at photon energies below 100 keV. It is recommended that the effective atomic number of future films be produced as close to that of water and that thicker active layers are advantageous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G H Sutherland
- Ottawa Carleton Institute for Physics, Carleton University Campus, Ottawa K1S 5B6, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
|
42
|
Thomson RM, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo dosimetry for I125 and P103d eye plaque brachytherapy with various seed models. Med Phys 2009; 37:368-76. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3271104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
43
|
|
44
|
Abstract
In current dosimetry protocols for electron beams, for plane-parallel chambers, the effective point of measurement is at the front face of the cavity, and, for cylindrical chambers, it is at a point shifted 0.5r upstream from the cavity center. In this study, Monte Carlo simulations are employed to study the issue of effective point of measurement for both plane-parallel chambers and cylindrical thimble chambers in electron beams. It is found that there are two ways of determining the position of the effective point of measurement: One is to match the calculated depth-ionization curve obtained from a modeled chamber to a calculated depth-dose curve; the other is to match the electron fluence spectrum in the chamber cavity to that in the phantom. For plane-parallel chambers, the effective point of measurement determined by the first method is generally not at the front face of the chamber cavity, which is obtained by the second method, but shifted downstream toward the cavity center by an amount that could be larger than one-half a millimeter. This should not be ignored when measuring depth-dose curves in electron beams. For cylindrical chambers, these two methods also give different positions of the effective point of measurement: The first gives a shift of 0.5r, which is in agreement with measurements for high-energy beams and is the same as the value currently used in major dosimetry protocols; the latter gives a shift of 0.8r, which is closer to the value predicted by a theoretical calculation assuming no-scatter conditions. The results also show that the shift of 0.8r is more appropriate if the cylindrical chamber is to be considered as a Spencer-Attix cavity. In electron beams, since the water/air stopping-power ratio changes with depth in a water phantom, the difference of the two shifts (0.3r) will lead to an incorrect evaluation of the water/air stopping-power ratio at the point of measurement, thus resulting in a systematic error in determining the absorbed dose by cylindrical chambers. It is suggested that a shift of 0.8r be used for electron beam calibrations with cylindrical chambers and a shift of 0.4r-0.5r be used for depth-dose measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L L W Wang
- Ottawa Carleton Institute of Physics, Carleton University Campus, Ottawa, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
La Russa DJ, Rogers DWO. Accuracy of Spencer-Attix cavity theory and calculations of fluence correction factors for the air kerma formalism. Med Phys 2009; 36:4173-83. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3174862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
46
|
Wang LLW, La Russa DJ, Rogers DWO. Systematic uncertainties in the Monte Carlo calculation of ion chamber replacement correction factors. Med Phys 2009; 36:1785-9. [PMID: 19544797 DOI: 10.1118/1.3115982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
In a previous study [Med. Phys. 35, 1747-1755 (2008)], the authors proposed two direct methods of calculating the replacement correction factors (P(repl) or P(cav)P(dis)) for ion chambers by Monte Carlo calculation. By "direct" we meant the stopping-power ratio evaluation is not necessary. The two methods were named as the high-density air (HDA) and low-density water (LDW) methods. Although the accuracy of these methods was briefly discussed, it turns out that the assumption made regarding the dose in an HDA slab as a function of slab thickness is not correct. This issue is reinvestigated in the current study, and the accuracy of the LDW method applied to ion chambers in a 60Co photon beam is also studied. It is found that the two direct methods are in fact not completely independent of the stopping-power ratio of the two materials involved. There is an implicit dependence of the calculated P(repl) values upon the stopping-power ratio evaluation through the choice of an appropriate energy cutoff delta, which characterizes a cavity size in the Spencer-Attix cavity theory. Since the delta value is not accurately defined in the theory, this dependence on the stopping-power ratio results in a systematic uncertainty on the calculated P(repl) values. For phantom materials of similar effective atomic number to air, such as water and graphite, this systematic uncertainty is at most 0.2% for most commonly used chambers for either electron or photon beams. This uncertainty level is good enough for current ion chamber dosimetry, and the merits of the two direct methods of calculating P(repl) values are maintained, i.e., there is no need to do a separate stopping-power ratio calculation. For high-Z materials, the inherent uncertainty would make it practically impossible to calculate reliable P(repl) values using the two direct methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L L W Wang
- Ottawa Carleton Institute of Physics, Carleton University, Campus Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario KIS 5B6, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
La Russa DJ, Rogers DWO. Accuracy of EGSnrc calculations at Co60 energies for the response of ion chambers configured with various wall materials and cavity dimensions. Med Phys 2008; 35:5629-40. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3013701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
49
|
Thomson RM, Taylor REP, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo dosimetry for I125 and Pd103 eye plaque brachytherapy. Med Phys 2008; 35:5530-5543. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3002412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2008] [Revised: 09/22/2008] [Accepted: 09/22/2008] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
50
|
Taylor REP, Rogers DWO. EGSnrc Monte Carlo calculated dosimetry parameters for Ir192 and Yb169 brachytherapy sources. Med Phys 2008; 35:4933-44. [DOI: 10.1118/1.2987676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|