Abstract P2-11-01: Effects of chemotherapy on the ovary: What you didn't know

Background: It has long been known that chemotherapy can result in premature menopause, causing follicular senescence and estrogen depletion with associated hot flashes and mood alterations. What is less well appreciated is whether the stroma of the ovary is equally impacted after chemotherapy, resulting in androgen deprivation. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate whether androgen levels are adversely affected after chemotherapy and whether this is associated with unwanted symptoms.

Methods: Women who were premenopausal, newly diagnosed with breast cancer, and about to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy were followed longitudinally. Women with adrenal insufficiencies, taking steroids, oral contraceptives, or had had previous chemotherapy were excluded. Self report questionnaires regarding sexual function, fatigue, mood, menstrual symptoms; menstrual diaries; and blood were collected at 4 points: before treatment, mid chemotherapy, post chemotherapy and 6 months later. Serum concentrations of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) (adrenal hormone), bioavailable testosterone (bioT), androstenedione (Adione) (stromal hormone), estrone (E1), estradiol (E2) (follicular hormone), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, comparisons of means by two sided t-tests and Pearson correlation coefficients were computed. Six month post treatment data are reported.

Results: 24 women were accrued and 21 provided serum and questionnaires through 6 months. All sex steroid hormones decreased during chemotherapy and did not return to baseline by 6 months for the group as a whole. At 6 months, 14 women were postmenopausal per FSH, E2 and menstrual diaries and 7 had resumed menses. There were no significant differences in hormone concentrations at baseline between women who ended up menopausal from those who resumed menses. However, at 6 months, postmenopausal women had significantly lower concentrations than premenopausal women of E2 (289 pg/ml pre- 9 pg/ml post), E1 (132 pg/ml pre- 22 pg/ml post), and Adione (102 ng/dL pre- 56 ng/dL post), but not DHEA-S or bioT (all p < .01). E2 was significantly correlated with Adione (R = .47 p = .03), and E1 (R = .57, p = .007). Low to moderate correlations were found between hormone concentrations and symptoms. The use of tamoxifen was significantly, and negatively correlated with the total score on the Female Sexual Function Index (r = −.572, p = .005), indicating worse sexual function for women on tamoxifen.

Conclusion: These data support the hypothesis that the post chemotherapy ovary suffers both follicular and stromal dysfunction, as noted by lower Adione, which is specific to the ovarian stroma. Adione concentrations in the postmenopausal group women are similar to published reports of women post oophorectomy. This is the first longitudinal study we are aware of to evaluate ovarian stromal function in women undergoing chemotherapy. This total hormone depletion may be why women experiencing chemotherapy induced menopause report severe and distressing menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes. Estrogen is often implicated, but androgen deprivation in this population should be taken into consideration when planning interventions to improve health related quality of life.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-01.

Relationship of sensory symptoms and motor function in patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) utilizing the EORTC QLQ CIPN20: NCCTG study N06CA

9587

Background: CIPN is characterized by adjectives not covered directly by most common measures of pain and functional limitations. Possible descriptors include numbness, tingling and shooting/burning pain. A prospective neuropathy treatment trial provided data to explore the relationship between self-reported aspects of this symptom. Methods: Baseline EORTC QLQ CIPN20 data and NCI CTCAE V3.0 (CTC)neuropathy grade (I-IV) were provided for all patients on trial. Spearman correlation coefficients and Kappa's coefficients of agreement were calculated between individual items and subscales of the CIPN20 as well as the CTC neuropathy scale. Simple regression models were applied to examine the association between the sensory symptoms and motor function in the fingers/hands (F/H). 200 patients provided 80% power to detect a correlation coefficient of 0.20 with a 5% Type I error. Results: A majority of patients reported “quite a bit” to “very much” numbness (57%) or tingling (62%) in F/H compared to “a little” or “not at all” (numbness (43%), tingling (38%)) by the CIPN20. In contrast, only 13% of the participants had grade III/IV neuropathy determined by the CTC scale. Fewer patients reported the higher two levels of CIPN20-measured shooting/burning pain in F/H (20% “quite a bit” to “very much”). Numbness and tingling were highly correlated (kappa=0.56), while neither were in high agreement with shooting/burning pain (kappa= 0.05 (tingling) and 0.14 (numbness)). The CIPN20 sensory and motor subscales were significantly associated with each other (p<.0001) but were not or only weakly associated with the CTC. Specifically, tingling, numbness, and shooting/burning pain were not associated with the CTC (R=0.16, 0.18 and 0 .11, respectively). Using the CIPN20, all three sensations; numbness, tingling and shooting or burning pain were strongly associated with motor function. Conclusions: The most common moderate to severe CIPN symptoms were numbness and tingling with shooting/burning pain being less common. Shooting/ burning pain appears to be a separate symptom experience from numbness and tingling. The CTC neuropathy grading scale appears to be less sensitive than the CIPN20 in picking up sensory symptoms.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Assessing simple measures of patient-reported (PR) fatigue for oncology clinical trials: A pooled analysis of 3,915 patients

9563

Background: Fatigue is a prevalent and debilitating symptom reported by cancer patients (pts) which compromises a pt's quality of life (QOL). This study examined the relationship between PR fatigue and QOL as well as cancer-related symptoms (CRS) in 43 North Central Cancer Treatment Group and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center clinical trials. Methods: 3,915 pts from 43 oncology clinical trials provided baseline fatigue data on a single-item 0–100 point scale. Pts' QOL assessment included a single-item overall QOL and associated QOL domains measured by numerical analogues, the Profile of Mood States (POMS), and PR symptom assessment measures. Associations between fatigue and QOL domains were assessed by Spearman correlation coefficients. Wilcoxon rank sum test compared QOL scores between pts with clinically deficient fatigue(CDF, score ≤50) vs. no clinically deficient fatigue (nCDF, score>50). Changes from baseline in fatigue and QOL were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test with a 20-point change defined as clinically meaningful. Results: 38% of pts reported CDF at baseline and 45% of pts reported CDF at last assessment. Fatigue was only moderately correlated at best with overall QOL, pain, POMS, social and physical function (Spearman rho's of .27,.40, .56, .38 and .38 respectively). Pts with CDF averaged over 10 points lower overall QOL, pain, POMS, social, and physical function (see table below, all p<.0001) as well as worsening CRS including sleepiness, nausea, headache, abnormal sweating, trouble sleeping, dry mouth, and sexual dysfunction (all p<.001). Pts with 20+ points worsening in fatigue declined in overall QOL, physical function, pain and POMS (all p<.0001). Conclusions: Patients with CDF suffer greater deficits in QOL and CRS. Patients report fatigue as distinctly different from overall QOL, pain, physical, social, mood status and CRS. Fatigue appears with a broad spectrum of CRS clusters. Routine measurement and management of fatigue could impact QOL and treatment-related symptoms.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.