Malignant Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: An Orthogonal Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) are generally indolent; however, some patients present with "malignant" SPN. An orthogonal analysis of multiple datasets was performed to investigate the utility of complete surgical resection (CSR) for malignant SPN.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed for cases of malignant SPN, defined as T4, N1, and/or M1. Malignant SPN was analyzed within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and compared with T1-3N0M0 SPN. Predictors of malignant SPN were assessed, and treatments were analyzed by using survival analysis.

RESULTS

The systematic review yielded 164 cases of malignant SPN. Of 31 children, only one died due to malignant SPN. Among adults, CSR was associated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS) (P = 0.0002). Chemotherapy did not improve malignant SPN DSS, whether resected (P = 0.8485) or not (P = 0.2219). Of 692 adults with SPN within the NCDB, 93 (13.4%) had malignant SPN. Pancreatic head location (odds ratio [OR] 2.174; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.136-4.166; P = 0.0186) and tumor size (OR 1.154; 95% CI 1.079-1.235; P < 0.0001) associated with the malignant phenotype. Malignant SPN predicted decreased overall survival (OS) compared with T1-3N0M0 disease (P < 0.0001). Resected malignant SPN demonstrated improved OS (P < 0.0001), including resected stage IV malignant SPN (P = 0.0003). Chemotherapy did not improve OS for malignant SPN, whether resected (P = 0.8633) or not (P = 0.5734). Within a multivariable model, resection was associated with decreased hazard of death (hazard ratio 0.090; 95% CI 0.030-0.261; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 13% of patients with SPN present with a malignant phenotype. Pediatric cases may be less aggressive. Resection may improve survival for malignant SPN, which does not appear chemosensitive.

Segmental bile duct resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal third bile duct cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding oncologic outcomes of segmental bile duct resection (SBDR) versus pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for bile duct cancers (BDC) are conflicting. We compared SBDR and PD for BDC utilizing pooled data analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive PRISMA 2020 systematic review was performed. Studies comparing SBDR with PD for BDC were included. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Study quality, bias, heterogeneity, and certainty were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve studies from 2004 to 2021 were included, comprising 533 SBDR and 1,313 PD. SBDR was associated with positive proximal duct margins (OR 1.56; CI 1.11-2.18; P = .01), and distal duct margins (OR 43.25; CI 10.38-180.16; P < .01). SBDR yielded fewer lymph nodes (MD -6.93 nodes; CI -9.72-4.15; P < .01) and detected fewer nodal metastases (OR 0.72; CI 0.55-0.94; P = .01). SBDR portended less perioperative morbidity (OR 0.31; CI 0.21-0.46; P < .01), but not mortality (OR 0.52; CI 0.20-1.32; P = .17). SBDR was associated with locoregional recurrences (OR 1.88; CI 1.01-3.53; P = .02), and lymph node recurrences (OR 2.13; CI 1.42-3.2; P = .04). SBDR yielded decreased 5-year OS (OR 0.75; CI 0.65-0.85; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite decreased perioperative morbidity, SBDR appears to provide inferior oncologic control for BDC.

Pancreatic carcinosarcoma: An orthogonal analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic carcinosarcoma is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer. There are no consensus guidelines regarding its treatment. The current study is an orthogonal analysis of multiple datasets to evaluate prognostic features.

METHODS

A modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 systematic review was performed for reported cases of pancreatic carcinosarcoma. All cases of pancreatic carcinosarcoma in the National Cancer Database were identified for analysis. Analyses were compared to previously published data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to increase validity.

RESULTS

Seventy-one cases of pancreatic carcinosarcoma were reported in the literature. Reports of pancreatic carcinosarcoma increased over time (P = .0075). Tumor size >5.0 cm, metastatic disease, and relapse were associated with decreased disease-specific survival (all log-rank P < .05). Ninety-nine cases of pancreatic carcinosarcoma were analyzed within the National Cancer Database. Pancreatic carcinosarcoma incidence increased over time (P = .0371). Resection + chemotherapy, pathologic lymph node examination, and treatment at an academic center were associated with improved overall survival (all log-rank P < .05), whereas harboring ≥2 positive lymph nodes was associated with decreased overall survival (log-rank P = .0171). Within a multivariable model adjusting for age, sex, comorbid disease, and disease stage, resection + chemotherapy was associated with a decreased hazard of death (hazard ratio .036; confidence Interval .004-.298; P = .0022). Published data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database supported the current analysis regarding the incidence of pancreatic carcinosarcoma, resection, lymph node evaluation, and the impact of metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic carcinosarcoma is exceedingly rare, with a poor prognosis. Long-term survival is possible with curative resection in the absence of relapse. The number of positive lymph nodes appears to impact prognosis.

Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Cancers originating in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction constitute a major global health problem. Esophageal cancers are histologically classified as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma, which differ in their etiology, pathology, tumor location, therapeutics, and prognosis. In contrast to esophageal adenocarcinoma, which usually affects the lower esophagus, esophageal SCC is more likely to localize at or higher than the tracheal bifurcation. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1, has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with locally advanced esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on the management of recurrent or metastatic disease.

Peritoneal metastases from primary appendiceal and colorectal carcinomas demonstrate distinct molecular identities on comprehensive tumor analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Published data comparing peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancers (pAC) and colorectal cancers (pCRC) remain sparse. We compared pAC and pCRC using comprehensive tumor profiling (CTP).

METHODS

CTP was performed, including next-generation sequencing and analysis of copy number variation (CNV), microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six pAC and 348 pCRC samples underwent CTP. The cohorts' age and gender were similar. pCRC demonstrated increased pathogenic variants (PATHs) in APC (48% vs. 3%, p < 0.01), ARID1A (12% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), BRAF (12% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), FBXW7 (7% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), KRAS (52% vs. 41%, p < 0.05), PIK3CA (15% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), and TP53 (53% vs. 23%, p < 0.01), and decreased PATHs in GNAS (8% vs. 31%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in CNV, fusion rate, or MSI. Median TMB was higher in pCRC (5.8 vs. 5.0 mutations per megabase, p = 0.0007). Rates of TMB-high tumors were similar (pAC 2.1% vs. pCRC 9.0%, p = 0.1957). pCRC had significantly more TMB-high tumors at lower thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a reduced overall TMB, pAC demonstrated mutations distinct from those seen in pCRC. These may serve as discrete biomarkers for future study.

Tumor Location in the Pancreatic Tail Is Associated with Decreased Likelihood of Receiving Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy (CTX) is associated with improved survival for patients undergoing resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The current study evaluated the influence of tumor location on receipt of CTX.

METHODS

The NCDB (2006-2017) was queried to identify patients with clinical stage I-III PDAC. Predictors of receipt of CTX, sequencing of CTX, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 14,557 patients who underwent resection for PDAC 3,453 (24%) did not receive CTX. On multivariable analysis, patients with tail tumors were 15% less likely to receive CTX (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.747-0.968) and 58% less likely to receive neoadjuvant CTX (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.351-0.509) relative to patients with head/neck tumors. For patients with body tumors, there was no difference in rates of administration or sequence of CTX. For patients with resected tail tumors, median OS was 29.9 vs 18.9 months (p < 0.001) between those who did and did not receive CTX. For patients with tail tumors, independent predictors of not receiving CTX, regardless of sequence, were increasing age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.935-0.965), increasing post-op length of stay (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.932-0.968), and 30-day post-op readmission (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.315-0.670).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinical stage I-III PDAC, tumor location within the tail was independently associated with not receiving CTX. Given the marked improvement in OS when CTX is administered, strategies aimed at increasing the number of these patients who receive CTX are necessary.

The Association of Race With Adequate Lymph Node Evaluation for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

National studies have reported racial and socioeconomic disparities in gastric cancer (GC) care. The current study evaluated adequate lymph node (LN) assessment (≥16 LNs) during resection for GC within a healthcare system servicing a socioeconomically disparate, mostly non-White population in the Southeast United States.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing resection for GC between 2003-2019 was performed. Factors associated with adequate LN assessment including patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 202 patients, adequate LN assessment was performed in 97 (48%) patients. On univariable analysis, younger age, non-White race, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Medicaid or no insurance, D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy, clinical evidence of regional LN metastases, total gastrectomy, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy were associated with adequate LN assessment. On multivariable analysis, non-White race (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.38-5.65), CCI <4 (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.15-3.96), and D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.96-6.74) were the only factors independently associated with adequate LN evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, non-White race, independent of socioeconomics, was significantly associated with adequate LN assessment. Future work is necessary to improve standardization and achieve higher rates of adequate LN assessment for all patients during resection for GC.

Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Giant Paraesophageal Hernia With Obstructing Splenic Flexure Mass in the Left Hemithorax

Giant paraesophageal hernias contain greater than fifty percent of the stomach above the diaphragm. Over fifty percent of large bowel obstructions are due to colorectal adenocarcinoma. Here, we present a rare case of a 69-year-old female patient who developed a closed loop colonic obstruction caused by a colonic mass in the distal transverse colon within a giant paraesophageal hernia. We successfully performed emergent paraesophageal hernia reduction and mesh repair with extended right hemicolectomy and ileocolonic anastomosis. Emergent hernia repair via an abdominal approach can be used in this setting.

Role of TGF-β in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression and PD-L1 expression

PURPOSE

The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) pathway plays a paradoxical, context-dependent role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC): a tumor-suppressive role in non-metastatic PDAC and a tumor-promotive role in metastatic PDAC. We hypothesize that non-SMAD-TGF-β signaling induces PDAC progression.

METHODS

We investigated the expression of non-SMAD-TGF-β signaling proteins (pMAPK14, PD-L1, pAkt and c-Myc) in patient-derived tissues, cell lines and an immunocompetent mouse model. Experimental models were complemented by comparing the signaling proteins in PDAC specimens from patients with various survival intervals. We manipulated models with TGF-β, gemcitabine (DNA synthesis inhibitor), galunisertib (TGF-β receptor inhibitor) and MK-2206 (Akt inhibitor) to investigate their effects on NF-κB, β-catenin, c-Myc and PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was also investigated in cancer cells and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) in a mouse model.

RESULTS

We found that tumors from patients with aggressive PDAC had higher levels of the non-SMAD-TGF-β signaling proteins pMAPK14, PD-L1, pAkt and c-Myc. In PDAC cells with high baseline β-catenin expression, TGF-β increased β-catenin expression while gemcitabine increased PD-L1 expression. Gemcitabine plus galunisertib decreased c-Myc and NF-κB expression, but induced PD-L1 expression in some cancer models. In mice, gemcitabine plus galunisertib treatment decreased metastases (p = 0.018), whereas galunisertib increased PD-L1 expression (p < 0.0001). In the mice, liver metastases contained more TAMs compared to the primary pancreatic tumors (p = 0.001), and TGF-β increased TAM PD-L1 expression (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In PDAC, the non-SMAD-TGF-β signaling pathway leads to more aggressive phenotypes, TAM-induced immunosuppression and PD-L1 expression. The divergent effects of TGF-β ligand versus receptor inhibition in tumor cells versus TAMs may explain the TGF-β paradox. Further evaluation of each mechanism is expected to lead to the development of targeted therapies.

The Role of Perioperative Chemotherapy in the Management of Colloid Carcinoma of the Pancreas

OBJECTIVES

Colloid carcinoma (CC) of the pancreas is associated with an improved prognosis compared with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet studies on the optimal management of these rare lesions are lacking.

METHODS

Patients with CC or PDAC treated from 2004 to 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between groups and stratified by disease stage. Survival analysis evaluating the role of perioperative chemotherapy was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1295 CC patients (11%) and 10,855 PDAC patients (89%) were identified. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was associated with a higher likelihood of mortality compared with CC (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.45; P < 0.001). When stratifying by stage, perioperative chemoradiation improved overall survival in early stage (I/IIA) PDAC but had no effect in CC patients. However, for node-positive disease (stage IIB), median overall survival was improved with adjuvant chemoradiation for both CC patients (22 vs 13 months; P < 0.001) and PDAC patients (20 vs 11 months; P < 0.001) compared with surgery alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery alone may be sufficient for the management of node-negative (I/IIA) CC lesions in contrast to conventional PDAC, whereas CC patients with stage IIB disease have a survival benefit from perioperative chemoradiation.

Traveling for Pancreatic Cancer Care Is Worth the Trip

BACKGROUND

Centralized care for patients with pancreatic cancer is associated with longer survival. We hypothesized that increased travel distance from home is associated with increased survival for pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database user file for all pancreatic cancer patients was investigated from 2004 through 2015. Distance from the patients' zip code to the treating facility was determined. Survival was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox hazard ratios (CoxHRs) were determined based on stage of disease, distance traveled for care, and clinical factors.

RESULTS

340 780 patients were identified. In the average age of 68 ± 12 years, 51% were male and 83% were Caucasian. For all stages of cancer, longer survival was associated with traveling farther (P < .001). The survival advantage was longer for Caucasians than African Americans (3.7 months vs. 2.6 months, P < .001) Travel was associated with a 13% decrease in risk of death (P < .001). Even controlling for the pathologic stage, traveling farther was associated with decreased risk of death (CoxHR = .91, P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Traveling for care is associated with improved survival for pancreatic cancer patients. While a selection bias may exist, the fact that all stages of patients investigated benefited suggests that this is a real phenomenon.

Analysis of the Survival Impact of Postoperative Chemotherapy After Preoperative Chemotherapy and Resection for Gastric Cancer

Background

Perioperative chemotherapy is a standard-of-care treatment for patients with gastric cancer. However, the impact of the postoperative chemotherapy (postCTX) component on overall survival (OS) is not well defined.

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2006–2014 was queried for patients who received preoperative chemotherapy (preCTX) and resection for gastric cancer. Analysis was performed to identify factors influencing receipt of postCTX. The impact of postCTX on OS was evaluated in propensity-matched groups.

Results

Among 3449 patients who received preCTX and resection for gastric cancer, 1091 (31.6%) received postCTX. Independent predictors of receiving postCTX were diagnosis after 2010 (odds ratio [OR] 1.985), distal tumor location (OR 1.348), and 15 or more lymph nodes examined (OR 1.214). Predictors of not receiving postCTX were older age (OR 0.985), comorbidity score higher than 1 (OR 0.592), and black race (OR 0.791). After propensity-matching (1091 per group), the median OS was 56.8 months for those who did receive postCTX versus 52.5 months for those who did not (p = 0.131). Subset analysis according to tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, number of lymph nodes evaluated, T and N class, and AJCC stage identified an improvement in OS for the patients with N1 disease who received postCTX compared with those who did not (79.6 vs 41.3 months; p = 0.025). However, no other subgroup had a significant survival benefit.

Conclusions

Additional postCTX was administered to a minority of patients who received preCTX and gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and its influence on OS appeared to be limited. Future trials should aim to define patients who will benefit from postCTX.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-09045-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Critical analysis of lymph node examination in patients undergoing curative-intent resection for adrenocortical carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor and the role of lymph node dissection remains ill-defined. This study evaluates the effect of nodal examination on prognosis and survival in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of ACC.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was queried for patients undergoing margin-negative resection for ACC. Patients with distant metastases, neoadjuvant therapy, multivisceral resection and T4 tumors were excluded.

RESULTS

Among 897 patients, 147 (16.4%) had lymph nodes examined. Factors associated with lymph node examination included increasing tumor size (P < .001), extra-adrenal extension (P < .001), open operation (P < .001), and resection at an academic facility (P = .003). Lymph node metastasis was significantly associated with extra-adrenal tumor extension (P = .04). Lymph node harvest, regardless of the number of nodes examined, was not associated with a survival benefit. Median overall survival was incrementally worse with increasing number of positive lymph nodes (88.2 months for N0, 34.9 months for 1-3 positive nodes, and 15.6 months for ≥4 positive nodes, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node harvest and lymph node metastasis were associated with more advanced tumors. Although nodal harvest did not offer a survival advantage, stratifying the nodal staging classification may provide important prognostic information.

The Impact of Prolonged Chemotherapy to Surgery Interval and Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Pathological Complete Response and Overall Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Patients

Background:

We aimed to study the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery (NCT-S) interval and neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) on pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]).

Methods:

National Cancer Data Base (NCDB)–pancreatectomy patients who underwent NCT/NRT were included. The NCT-S interval was divided into time quintiles in weeks: 8 to 11, 12 to 14, 15 to 19, 20 to 29, and >29 weeks.

Results:

A total of 2093 patients with NCT were included with median follow-up of 74 months and 71% NRT. The pCR rate was 2.1% with higher median OS compared with non-pCR (41 vs 19 months, P = .03). The pCR rate increased with longer NCT-S interval (quintiles: 1%, 1.6%, 1.7%, 3%, and 6%, P < .001, respectively). In logistic regression, NRT (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-6.1, P = .03) and NCT-S >29 weeks (OR = 6.1, 95% CI = 2.02-18.50, P < .001) were predictive of increased pCR. The prolonged NCT-S interval and pCR were independent predictors of OS, whereas NRT was not.

Conclusions:

Longer NCT-S interval and pCR were independent predictors of improved OS in patients with PDAC. The NRT predicted increased pCR but not OS.

Implications of Conversion during Attempted Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although advocated by some, minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is controversial. Moreover, the oncologic implications for patients requiring conversion to an open procedure during attempted MIA for ACC are not extensively reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients undergoing resection for ACC. Overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing successful MIA was compared with those requiring conversion, and additionally evaluated with a multivariable Cox regression analysis including other factors associated with OS. After propensity matching, those experiencing conversion were further compared with patients who underwent planned open resection.

RESULTS

Among 196 patients undergoing attempted MIA for ACC, 38 (19.4%) required conversion. Independent of 90-day postoperative mortality, conversion was associated with significantly reduced OS compared with successful MIA (median 27.9 months versus not reached, p = 0.002). Even for tumors confined to the adrenal, conversion was associated with worse median OS compared with successful MIA (median 34.2 months versus not reached, p = 0.003). After propensity matching for clinicopathologic covariates to establish well-balanced cohorts (N = 38 per group), patients requiring conversion during MIA had significantly worse OS than those having planned open resection (27.9 months versus 50.5 months, p = 0.020). On multivariable analysis for predictors of OS, conversion during MIA (HR 2.32, p = 0.003) was independently associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

ACC is a rare tumor for which adequate oncologic resection is the only chance for cure. Given the relatively high rate of conversion and its associated inferior survival, open resection should be considered standard of care for known or suspected ACC.

The Usefulness of the Pretreatment Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of the 5-Year Survival in Stage 1-3 Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Background

We have previously shown that the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a predictor of survival among breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of NLR among different nodal and chemotherapy subgroups of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods

Patients with stage 1-3 TNBC who underwent treatment from 2007 to 2014 and had blood counts prior to treatments were included. Patients were categorized into high (≥2) and low (<2) NLR groups. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

The average follow-up time was 54 months. The high NLR group had worse OS (HR 2.8, CI 1.3-5.9, p < 0.001) and DFS (HR 2.3, CI 1.2-4.2, p < 0.001) than the low NLR group. After adjusting for confounding variables, high NLR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 5.5, CI 2.2-13.7, p < 0.0001) and DFS (HR 5.2, CI 2.3-11.6, p < 0.0001). Categorization of TNBC patients by NLR (high vs. low) and nodal status (positive vs. negative) resulted in four groups with significantly different OS and DFS (log rank p < 0.0001). Significant improvements in OS (p < 0.001) and DFS (p < 0.001) were observed for patients who received chemotherapy and had high NLR but not for patients with low NLR (p = 0.65 and p = 0.07, respectively).

Conclusion

High pretreatment NLR is an independent predictor of poor OS and DFS among TNBC patients. Combining NLR and pN provides better risk stratification for TNBC patients. Chemotherapy appears to be beneficial only in patients with high NLR. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Comprehensive tumor profiling reveals unique molecular differences between peritoneal metastases and primary colorectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Peritoneal metastases (PM) from primary colorectal cancer (pCRC) are associated with poor outcomes; however, molecular differences are not well defined.

METHODS

We compared unpaired tumor profiles of patients with pCRC and PM from Caris Life Sciences. Testing included next-generation sequencing of 592 genes, microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Mutations were test-defined as pathogenic (PATH).

RESULTS

Six hundred seventeen pCRC and 348 PM patients had similar gender (55% male) and age (median 59). PATHs were similar between PM and pCRC in KRAS, BRAF, SMAD2, SMAD4, and PTEN. pCRC PATHs were increased in APC (76% vs 48%, P < .01), ARID1A (29% vs 12%, P < .05), TP53 (72% vs 53%, P < .01), PIK3CA (22% vs 15%, P < .05), and FBXW7 (13% vs 7%, P < .01) compared with PM. Mucinous PM had more PATHs in GNAS (19% vs 8%, P = .032) while nonmucinous PM had more PATHs in BRAF (13% vs 8%, P = .027). Right-sided PM had decreased PATHs in APC (39% vs 68%, P < .0001), ARID1A (7% vs 38%, P < .004), and TP53 (48% vs 65%, P = .033) while there were no difference for left-sided PM. Nine percent of pCRC and 6% of PM were MSI-high (P = NS). There was no difference in TMB-high, TMB-intermediate, or TMB-low between PM and pCRC.

CONCLUSIONS

PM have similar rates of KRAS mutation with increased PATHs in GNAS (mucinous) and BRAF (nonmucinous) compared to pCRC. No differences in MSI or TMB were identified between PM and pCRC tumors. These findings inform future study into the molecular profile of PM.

Surgical Management of the Axilla in Patients with Occult Breast Cancer (cT0 N+) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Occult breast cancer (OBC) is a rare clinical entity. Current surgical management includes axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) with or without mastectomy. We sought to investigate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with OBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Patients with clinical T0N+ breast cancer were selected from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB, 2004-2014) and compared according to axillary surgical approach, SLNB (≤ 4 LNs) or ALND (> 4 LNs). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Secondary outcome was complete pathological response (pCR).

RESULTS

A total of 684 patients with OBC were identified: 470 (68.7%) underwent surgery upfront and 214 (31.3%) received NAC. Of the NAC patients, 34 (15.9%) underwent SLNB and 180 (84.1%) ALND. One hundred and fifty-three (72%) patients received radiotherapy (RT). There was no difference in pCR rates between the ALND and SLNB (34.3% vs 24.5%, respectively p = 0.245). In patients undergoing surgery first, improved OS was observed with ALND compared to SLNB (106.9 vs 85.5 months, p = 0.013); however, no difference in OS was found in patients who received NAC (105.6 vs 111.3 months, p = 0.640). RT improved OS in patients who underwent NAC followed by SLNB (RT, 123 months vs no RT, 64 months, p = 0.034). Of NAC patients who did not undergo RT, ALND had superior survival compared to SLNB (113 vs 64 months, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

This is the first comparative analysis assessing the surgical management of the axilla in patients with OBC who underwent NAC. In this population, there was a decrease in survival in patients who underwent SLNB alone; however, with the addition of RT, there was no difference in OS between SLNB and ALND. SLNB plus RT may be considered as an alternative to ALND in patients with OBC who have a good response to NAC.

Is hepatic resection better than transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis?

Background

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remains controversial. We compared the outcomes of hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

Comprehensive online databases search was performed. Comparative studies measuring survival in HCC patients with PVTT undergoing HR versus TACE were included. Pooled risk ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years. Study quality and heterogeneity was assessed.

Results

Six studies comprising 1,320 patients were included. HR was done in 526 (39.8%) patients and TACE in 794 (60.2%) patients. Meta-analysis of all included studies showed improved OS in HR compared to TACE patients at 1-year (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.16-1.92, P=0.002), 3-year (OR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.55-7.12, P=0.002) and 5-year (OR: 3.91, 95% CI: 1.42-10.77, P=0.008). Survival benefit conferred by HR was 7-33 months. This benefit was mostly noted in tumors with PVTT types I and II and those with single lesions. Age, ECOG status, and STROBE score did not contribute to differences in survival.

Conclusions

Long-term survival outcomes of HCC with PVTT are superior in patients undergoing hepatectomy compared to TACE. Further experience with randomized clinical trials may be warranted to confirm these findings.

Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with an Increased Risk of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism After Distal Pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, the influence of operative technique on VTE risk after DP is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the MIS technique versus the open technique and the development of postoperative VTE after DP.

METHODS

Patients who underwent DP from 2014 to 2015 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pancreas-specific database. Multivariable logistic regression was then used to identify independent associations with the development of postoperative VTE after DP.

RESULTS

A total of 3558 patients underwent DP during this time period. Of these cases, 47.8% (n = 1702) were performed via the MIS approach. After adjusting for significant covariates, the MIS approach was independently associated with the development of any VTE (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.40; p = 0.025), as well as increasing the risk of developing a postdischarge VTE (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.08; p = 0.033) when compared with the open approach. There was an association between VTE and the development of numerous postoperative complications, including pneumonia, unplanned intubation, need for prolonged mechanical ventilation, and cardiac arrest.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the open approach, the MIS approach is associated with higher rates of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing DP. The majority of these events are diagnosed after hospital discharge.

The impact of race and socioeconomic status on the presentation, management and outcomes for gastric cancer patients: Analysis from a metropolitan area in the southeast United States

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic disparities in gastric cancer have been associated with differences in care and inferior outcomes. We evaluated the presentation, treatment, and survival for patients with gastric cancer (GC) in a metropolitan setting with a large African American population.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of patients with GC (2003-2018) across a multi-hospital system was performed. Associations between socioeconomic and clinicopathologic data with the presentation, treatment, and survival were examined.

RESULTS

Of 359 patients, 255 (71%) were African American and 104 (29%) Caucasian. African Americans were more likely to present at a younger age (64.0 vs 72.5, P < .001), have state-sponsored or no insurance (19.7% vs 6.9%, P = .02), reside within the lowest 2 quintiles for median income (67.4% vs 32.7%, P < .001), and have higher rates of Helicobacter pylori (14.9% vs 4.8%, P = .02). Receipt of multi-modality therapy was not impacted by race or insurance status. On multivariable analysis, only AJCC T class (HR 1.68) and node positivity (HR 2.43) remained significant predictors of disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

Despite socioeconomic disparities, African Americans, and Caucasians with GC had similar treatment and outcomes. African Americans presented at a younger age with higher rates of H. pylori positivity, warranting further investigation into differences in risk factors and tumor biology.

Utility of Radiation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Surgically Resectable Esophageal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) ± radiation (NRT) is the "gold standard" approach for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). However, the benefits of RT on overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable EC undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy remain controversial.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with nonmetastatic EC between 2004 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox multivariable regression analysis were performed to analyze OS. Logistic regression analyzed factors associated with 90-day mortality, lymph node involvement, and complete pathological response (pCR).

RESULTS

A total of 12,238 EC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy [neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACR), 92.1% and NAC, 7.9%] followed by esophagectomy were included. OS was similar in patients undergoing NAC ± RT (35.9 vs. 37.6 mo, respectively, p = 0.393). pCR rate was 18.1% (19.2%, NACR vs. 6.3%, NAC, p < 0.001). NRT was an independent predictor for increased pCR (HR 2.593, p < 0.001). Patients with pCR had increased survival compared with those without pCR (62.3 vs. 34.4 mo, p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between NACR and NAC (61.7 mo vs. median not reached, p = 0.745) in pCR patients. In non-pCR patients, NAC had improved OS compared with NACR (37.3 vs. 30.8 mo, p = 0.002). NRT was associated with worse 90-day mortality (8.2% vs. 7.7%, HR1.872, p = 0.036) In Cox regression, NRT was an independent predictor of worse OS (HR 1.561, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant RT is associated with improved pCR rates; however, it had deleterious effects in short- and long-term survival. Also, patients who did not achieve pCR had worse OS after neoadjuvant RT.

Cardiac physiology in post myocardial infarction patients: the effect of cardiac rehabilitation programs-a systematic review and update meta-analysis

Cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) is a recognized non-pharmacological modality to decrease mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CRP on the cardiac physiology in patients post myocardial infarction (MI). Online database search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, COCHRANE, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR were performed (1988-Mar 2016); key bibliographies were reviewed. Studies comparing post MI patients who were enrolled in a CRP to those who were not, were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) by random and fixed effects models of pooled data were calculated. Study quality was assessed using CONSORT criteria. Outcomes of interest measured included resting and maximum heart rate (HR), peak VO₂, ejection fraction (EF%), wall motion score index (WMSI), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) in cardiac rehabilitation patients versus control. Search strategy yielded 147 studies, 23 studies fulfilled the selection criteria, 19 of which were RCTs. These included a total of 1,683 patients; 827 were enrolled in a CRP while 855 did not receive the intervention. Median age was 58 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, comorbidities, severity of CAD, baseline EF or HR. Meta-analysis of data included demonstrated that CRP patients had lower post-intervention resting HR than non-CRP patients (SMD: -0.59; 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.46, fixed effect model P<0.05). EF% was significantly improved after CRP compared to control (SMD: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.40, P=0.03). Peak VO₂ was significantly improved by CRP (SMD: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.45; P<0.0001). LVEDV was significantly less in CRP patients (SMD: -0.31; 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.02, fixed effect model P<0.05). WMSI was significantly less in CRP patients (SMD: -0.41; 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.05, P=0.024). CRP improves cardiac function in post MI patients. This may explain the reported improvement of functionality and mortality among those patients. Further randomized trials may help evaluate the long-term benefits of CRP.

Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Change the Role of Regional Lymphadenectomy in Pancreatic Cancer Survival?

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of lymph node (LN) dissection and staging in outcomes of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stages I to III PDAC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014. Overall survival (OS) was derived from Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox-regression model was used to evaluate associations between the number of LN examined, number of positive nodes, and LN ratio with OS.

RESULTS

A total 35,599 patients were included, 3395 (9%) underwent NAC, 19,865 (56%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and 12,299 (35%) underwent surgery alone. Cox-regression showed superior OS in NAC compared with AC and surgery alone (26 vs 23 vs 14 months, P < 0.001). Minimum number of LN examined affecting OS was 8 LNs in NAC (23.8 vs 26.6 months, P = 0.029), and 12 LNs in AC group (22 vs 23.1 months, P = 0.028). Lymph node ratio cutoff of greater than 0.2 was associated with decreased OS (19.4 vs 24.4 months, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in PDAC. Lymph node yield remains a significant prognostic factor after NAC, whereas the minimum number of harvested LNs associated with sufficient staging and survival is decreased.

Abstract 5264: Metabolic reprogramming with β-alanine to overcome chemotherapy resistance in pancreatic cancer

Background: Increased aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) leading to acidic microenvironment confers chemoresistance to weakly basic Gemcitabine, the standard treatment in Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Metabolomic perturbations in two PDAC cell lines having differential sensitivity to Gemcitabine was investigated by profiling over 40 metabolites using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Notably, a significant decrease in the concentration of β-alanine (βA) was observed in Gem resistant compared to Gem sensitive cell line, suggesting βA may have a role in chemotherapy response. We aimed to evaluate the role of βA supplementation in improving Gem efficacy in Gem resistant cell lines

Methods: PDAC Panc-1 cell line extracts treated with Gem with and without βA supplementation were analysed via 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Aerobic glycolysis was quantified by measuring extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) using the Seahorse XF analyser platform. Global mRNA profiling was done by Next Generation Sequencing. Proliferation, migration and cell cycle analysis was measured by Xcelligence real time cell analysis system and flow cytometry, respectively. PANC-1 and BxPC-3 tumor xenografts treated with Gemcitabine with and without βA for 4 weeks and the tumor volumes and weights were measured.

Results: βA supplementation in Gem resistant cells results in: (1) decreased basal glycolytic rate, proton leak and ATP production; (2) increased pyruvate, decreased lactic acid and NAD+ concentrations with decreased LDH-A transcription; also increased carnosine levels with a more basic pH in the conditioned media; (3) enhanced sensitivity to Gem treatment, with a significant reduction in proliferation, cell migration, and increased apoptosis and relative hENt-1 mRNA levels and (5) xenograft tumor volumes and weights were significantly reduced upon βA supplementation.

Conclusion: βA supplementation reprograms cell metabolism by normalizing energy production and reducing microenvironment acidification, thus enhancing chemo-sensitivity in Gem resistant PDAC cells and xenografts. βA can be potentially used as a co-therapeutic in PDAC.

Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting.

Citation Format: Danny Yakoub, Smitha T. Totiger, Alexandra Moran, Sujit Suwal, Julio Pimentel, Lauren O'Donell, Jamie Walls, Nagaraj Nagathihalli, Nipun Merchant. Metabolic reprogramming with β-alanine to overcome chemotherapy resistance in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5264.

Optimal radiation dosing in concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This is the first meta-analysis to study optimal radiation dose in the setting of concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (cnCRT) for esophageal cancer (EC). We sought to compare outcomes between high dose radiotherapy (HDRT) [>48.85 Gy biologically effective dose (BED)] group and low dose radiotherapy (LDRT) (≤48.85 Gy BED) for patients with EC receiving cnCRT.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched independently by two members of our team on August 07, 2017. Articles were screened using Covidence. Study quality was assessed via CONSORT. Eligible studies had to be randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing cnCRT vs. surgery alone in full-text English. Those with induction or sequential chemoradiotherapy were excluded. We captured data points including radiation dose, hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), and treatment-related mortality (TRM). We analyzed HRs for OS and risk ratio (RR) for TRM and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) as the summary statistic. We used both fixed- and random-effects models in the presence of heterogeneity. The primary outcome was OS; secondary endpoint was treatment related mortality (TRM). We compared outcomes by HDRT vs. LDRT. To minimize chemotherapy heterogeneity, we performed a pre-planned analysis excluding the CROSS trial.

RESULTS

The eleven included studies contained a total of 1,697 patients. Eight hundred forty-eight were randomized into the cnCRT. Of these 848 patients, 287 received HDRT and 561 received LDRT. HR for OS was not statistically different between LDRT (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.8) and HDRT (HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.45-0.91). Excluding the CROSS trial, there was still no difference in outcomes between LDRT and HDRT. TRM was similar between LDRT and HDRT.

CONCLUSIONS

With no difference in OS or TRM between LDRT and HDRT, 48.85 Gy BED cnCRT may be a sufficient radiation dose for cnCRT for patients with EC fit for surgery.

Molecular comparison between peritoneal metastases (PM) and primary gastric (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer

4053

Background: PM from GC or GEJ portend a poor prognosis and molecular differences are ill defined. Methods: We compared genomic profiles of primary (P) GC and GEJ with PM patients (pts) and other metastases (OM) sent to Caris Life Sciences. Testing comprised immunohistochemistry (IHC) including programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), copy number alterations (CNA), 592-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS), microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Results: 1366 cases were identified: 1041 GC (707 P, 98 PM, 236 OM) and 325 GEJ (248 P, 5 PM, 72 OM). PM were increased in GC versus GEJ (9% v. 2%, p < 0.0001). 91% GC and 93% GEJ were adenocarcinoma (AD); GC were more likely signet ring (SR) histology versus GEJ (11% v. 3%, p < 0.0001) and GC PM were more likely SR versus other OM or P (13% v. 12% v. 7%, p = 0.067). The mean age of PM pts (57 years) was younger than primary GC (63, p = 0.002) and OM (61; p = 0.044). More PM GC pts were female than P or OM (48% v. 35% v. 34%, p = 0.03). No molecular profiling differences were seen between GEJ and GC pts and they were combined for analysis; findings from 1246 AD pts are shown below (see Table). OM (9%, p = 0.041) had more CNA in CCNE1 than PM (2%, p = 0.041) or P (5%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Compared to P and OM GC, PM pts were younger, more likely female and had a higher incidence of SR histology. PD-L1, HER2 IHC and ERBB2 CNA were reduced in PM versus P, suggesting novel therapeutic targets are needed. [Table: see text]

The value of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

79

Background: There are conflicting reports on the value of the extent of post neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) lymphadenectomy (LND) in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (E-ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (E-SCC). We sought to study the impact of LND variables [positive and total lymph node (LN) number and LN ratio (LNR)] on oncological outcomes in these patients. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base 2004-2014 was queried for patients with NCRT followed by esophagectomy. The median examined LN number was used to divide the patients into a higher (> 12) and lower (≤ 12) LND groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality. Results: A total 4708 patients were included. The median of positive, negative LN, and LNR were and (0, 11, 0%). The median and 5-year OS for higher LND group were higher than the lower LND group (39 vs. 32 months, 38% vs. 34%), p < 0.0001. OS was not significantly different among E-SCC subset or among those who achieved pathological complete response (pCR). The higher LND group had better 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality rates (61/2335 = 2.6%, 141/2308 = 6.1%) than lower LND group (86/2262 = 3.8%, 184/2251 = 8.2%), p = 0.01 and 0.001, respectively . In multivariate Cox regression analysis, higher LND group (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.96, p = 0.004) and LNR (per 10% increase: 1.11, 95% CI 1.09-1.13, p < 0.0001) were significant predictor of OS. Conclusions: The LND (> 12 examined LN) remains as a crucial treatment goal after NCRT with potential survival benefit, especially among E-ADC and those did not achieve pCR.

Impact of neoadjuvant radiation on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreatectomy

453

Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries a dismal prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACR) has been introduced to enhance the outcomes of patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC, however the role of radiation therapy remains largely unknown. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with stage I-III PDAC who underwent surgical resection from 2004 to 2014. Patients undergoing NACR were compared to those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone. The association between clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression model. Results: Of 3,133 patients, 2,351 (75%) patients underwent NACR and 782 (25%), NAC alone. Most patients were Caucasians (84%), treated at academic institutions (67%) and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (74%). Median follow-up time was 32 months (IQR, 22-50 months). Median number of lymph nodes examined (LNE) and number of positive nodes (NPN) were significantly decreased in NACR (13 vs. 16, p < 0.001 and 0 vs. 1, p < 0.001, respectively). Rates of margin positivity, median OS and 5-year OS were similar between 2 groups (NACR vs. NAC: 15% vs. 17%, p = 0.545; 25.7 months (95% CI 24.4–26.7) vs. 25.1 months (95% CI: 23.9–27.5), and 20% vs. 22%, p = 0.616, respectively, Figure 1). Subgroup analysis of high-risk features (R1/R2 and N1) also showed no difference in survival outcomes. Neoadjuvant radiation was not an independent predictor associated with OS, whereas advanced age, R1/R2, T3/T4, N1, and poorly differentiated histology were independent negative prognostic factors. Conclusions: NACR is associated with lower rates of lymph node positivity, however this did not translate in survival or margin positivity benefit compared to NAC alone. The role of radiotherapy in PDAC continues to evolve, however no convincing data is currently available to advocate the widespread use of radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Further evidence with prospective clinical trials is still warranted to confirm these findings.

Utility of radiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resectable esophageal cancer

172

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the gold standard approach for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC), however the addition of radiation remains largely controversial. We sought to investigate the role of neoadjuvant radiation in resectable EC by comparing outcomes of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with (NACR) or without radiation (NAC) using a large nationwide cohort. Methods: National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients with non-metastatic EC between 2010 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank and Cox multivariable regression analysis were performed to calculate overall survival (OS). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality and complete pathological response (pCR). Results: A total of 12,546 EC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy were included: the majority were males (84%), Caucasians (90.3%), and had adenocarcinoma (81.1%), cT3 (60.6%) and cN1 (49.1%). 11,269 (89.8%) patients had NACR, whereas 969 (7.7%), NAC alone. pCR rate was 14.1% (19.2%, NACR vs. 6.3%, NAC, p < 0.001). Neoadjuvant radiation was an independent predictor for improved pCR [HR 0.305, 95% CI 0.205-0.454, p < 0.001], however OS was similar in patients undergoing NAC with or without radiation (35.9 vs. 37.6 months, respectively, p = 0.393). This persisted regardless of tumor staging. There was a trend towards worse 90-day mortality after radiation (8.2%, NACR vs. 7.7%, NAC; HR 1.410, 95% CI 0.975-2.038, p = 0.068). In Cox regression, controlling for patient and disease-related factors, neoadjuvant radiation was an independent predictor of worse OS (HR 1.322, 965% CI 1.177-1.485, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This is the largest study comparing NACR versus NAC in resected EC. The addition of radiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved pathological response rates, however it had deleterious effects in long-term and possibly, short-term survival. Our findings suggest that NAC without radiation may be the optimal neoadjuvant therapy in resectable EC, however further evidence with randomized clinical trials is warranted.

The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy on short and long-term outcomes among gastric carcinoma patients

78

Background: There is little consensus on the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in gastric carcinoma (GC) patients. We sought to compare the outcomes of these two approaches in a large national data base. Methods: National Cancer Data Base PUF (2004-2014) of GC patients who underwent NCRT/NCT followed by resection were included. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), secondary outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection and postoperative mortality. Results: A total of 4204 GC patients with NCT were included, 62% of them had additional neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT). NCRT had higher pCR and R0 rates [551/2613 (21%), 2314/2561 (90%)] than NCT group [148/1573 (9%), 1242/1543 (80%)], p < 0.0001. Multivariate logistic regression showed similar higher odds of pCR (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.65-4.60, p < 0.0001) and R0 (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.14-1.99, p = 0.004) among NCRT versus NCT. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality. Median, 3- and 5-year OS for NCRT versus NCT were: (20.4 months, 24% and 11%) versus (18.3 months, 19% and 6%), p < 0.001. Univariate cox regression analysis showed superior OS with NRT (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.80-0.91, p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, pCR (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.18-0.24, p < 0.001) and R0 (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.61-0.75, p < 0.001) had better OS, while NRT was not. Conclusions: NRT improved pCR and R0 rates in GC without increase in surgical morbidity/mortality. The long-term OS benefit of NRT is likely secondary to higher pCR and R0 resection.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: resection with adjuvant hepatic artery infusion therapy vs resection alone. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a recurrence rate of up to 70% in 5 years after resection, detrimentally lowering survival. The role of adjuvant therapy remains controversial; therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the disease-free and overall survival of patients with HCC, not candidates for transplantation, undergoing resection and adjuvant hepatic artery infusion therapy vs resection alone. Our meta-analysis showed that adjuvant HAIC improves overall and disease-free survival after resection, especially in tumors ≥7 cm.

The Role of Completion Lymphadenectomy in Positive Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of melanoma with positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) remains unclear. Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) only yields additional positive non-SLN in 20% of cases and its benefits on survival remains debatable.

METHODS

An online database search of Medline was performed; key bibliographies were reviewed. Studies comparing outcomes after CLND versus observation were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by random fixed effects models of pooled data were calculated. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Search strategy yielded 117 publications. Twelve studies were selected for inclusion, comprising 7966 SLN-positive patients. Among these patients, 5306 (66.6%) subjects underwent CLND and 2660 (33.4%) patients were observed. Median Breslow thickness and ulceration were similar between groups (2.8 ± 0.6 mm versus 2.5 ± 0.8 mm, P = 0.721; and 38.8% versus 37.2%, P = 0.136, CLND versus observation, respectively). CLND was associated with statistically significant improved 3-y (71.0% versus 66.2%, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.97, P = 0.02) and 5-y DFS (48.3% versus 47.8%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.96, P = 0.02) compared with observation. However, no difference was demonstrated in 3-y MSS (83.7% versus 84.7%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88-1.35, P = 0.41), 5-y MSS (68.4% versus 69.8%, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.19, P = 0.78), or OS (68.2% versus 78.9%, OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.55-1.57, P = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this large-scale analysis, CLND improved both 3- and 5-y DFS, possibly because of increased rates of local control; however, this did not translate in improved MSS or OS. Efforts toward the identification of molecular markers associated with poor outcomes in SLN-positive patients who undergo observation are warranted.

A large national comparative study of clinicopathological features and long-term survivals between esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor and leiomyosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST) and leiomyosarcoma (E-LMS) are rare tumors. Previous studies are limited to small number of patients. We sought to study these two tumors using a large national database.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base 2004-2014 was queried for patients with E-GIST and E-LMS. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to investigate OS predictors.

RESULTS

We found 141 E-GIST and 38 E-LMS patients, with esophagectomy and systemic treatment rate of 55% and 49% for E-GIST and 50% and 26% for E-LMS. The 5-year OS of E-GIST and E-LMS were 62% and 23%, respectively, p < 0.001. In multivariable analysis, young age, tumor <10 cm, esophagectomy, and E-GIST were associated with superior OS. There was a higher median and mean OS with neoadjuvant vs. upfront surgery for E-GIST group (98 and 111 vs 79 and 80 months).

CONCLUSION

E E-GIST has superior OS compared to E-LMS. Esophagectomy is the cornerstone treatment modality. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant therapy in E-GIST patients.

Giant symptomatic gastric lipoma: A case report and literature review

•

Gastric lipomas may become symptomatic when ≥10 cm, at which point they are classified as giant gastric lipomas.

•

Giant gastric lipomas are extremely rare, with only 6 prior cases reported in the English worldwide literature since 1980.

•

Gastric lipoma density is similar to peripheral fat on CT, −80 to −120 Hounsfield units, which is nearly pathognomonic.

•

Circumferential excision of gastric lipomas with a clear margin of normal tissue is adequate for symptomatic resection.

•

Preservation of gastric continuity via gastrotomy and primary closure avoids complications of gastrojejunostomy.

Introduction

Lipomas are uncommon tumors of the gastrointestinal tract; gastric lipomas account for <1% of all gastric tumors encountered (Nickloes and Sutphin [1]). Giant gastric lipomas, defined as ≥10 cm, are exceedingly rare with only 6 cases reported since 1980 (Cappell et al., Termos et al., Singh et al., Ramaraj et al., Rao et al., Priyadarshi et al., Neto et al. [3–9]). We hereby present a case of a giant gastric lipoma that became symptomatic seven years after its initial identification and was excised preserving gastric continuity.

Case presentation

Our patient is a 58-year-old African American male with a 3 cm gastric mass incidentally found on CT in 2010. In September of 2017, the patient presented with severe epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. Abdominal CT scan revealed an increase in size of the patient’s gastric lesion to 7.2 × 10.3 × 7.3 cm. He underwent an exploratory laparotomy with transverse anterior gastrotomy and primary closure. Pathologic examination revealed a 12 cm submucosal, well-circumscribed, non-encapsulated mass comprised of mature adipose tissue without atypia or mitotic figures, consistent with lipoma.

Discussion

The majority of gastric lipomas are asymptomatic, identified on CT scan as round/ovoid masses with low attenuation and homogenous appearance, measuring −80 to −120 Hounsfield units. These findings are nearly pathognomonic. Due to the benign nature of gastric lipomas, circumferential excision with a clear margin of normal tissue is adequate for symptomatic resection. This is the second report of giant gastric lipoma excised with continuity preserving partial gastrectomy, avoiding gastrojejunostomy complications.

Conclusion

Fatty tumors are rare in the gastrointestinal tract, yet lipomas must be on the differential when masses are found with Hounsfield units similar to peripheral fat.

The Role of Surgical Resection for Stage IV Gastric Cancer With Synchronous Hepatic Metastasis

BACKGROUND

With improved responses to chemotherapy and targeted treatments, the role of surgery in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) to the liver needs to be revisited. We sought to examine whether surgical resection is associated with improvement of long-term survival.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for MGC to the liver (2010-2014). Survival analysis was performed to compare the effect of gastrectomy and perioperative chemotherapy (G-CT) to palliative chemotherapy (PCT) alone.

RESULTS

We identified 3175 patients with MGC to the liver. Most patients (94%, n = 2979) were treated with PCT, whereas 6% (n = 196 patients) underwent G-CT. Overall survival improved in patients treated with G-CT compared to PCT alone (16 versus 9.7 mo, P < 0.001). In patients undergoing G-CT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased overall survival compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (18.9 versus 14.8 mo, P = 0.011). Hazards of death significantly decreased with gastrectomy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.63, P < 0.001). Negative prognostic factors included advanced age (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06-1.14, P < 0.001), treatment at nonacademic institution (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.13-1.33, P < 0.001), and poorly differentiated grade (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.17-2.03, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

G-CT is associated with improved survival in patients with gastric cancer and synchronous liver metastasis. Further experience with well-designed prospective trials may be warranted to confirm these findings.

Myoepithelial carcinoma or epithelioid sarcoma - A rare diagnosis with poor prognosis. A case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Myoepithelial carcinoma and proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the vulva are two rare malignancies with known aggressive behavior. In addition to a similar clinical course, these two disease entities also have significant histologic and pathologic overlap. Given the rarity of these malignancies, there is limited literature on the appropriate treatment regimen. Nevertheless, there is a consensus that early surgical resection is beneficial in both cases.

PRESENTATION

We present a case of a patient who was initially diagnosed with myoepithelial carcinoma of the vulva with a differential later expanded to include possible epithelioid sarcoma.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrate the importance in early identification of a SMARCB1 deficiency. Additionally, we suggest an appropriate treatment regimen for these patients going forward. Specifically, we encourage consideration of bilateral superficial and deep inguinal lymphadenectomies. Furthermore, sarcoma based chemotherapy regimens in the appropriate clinical setting may be beneficial in treating SMARCB1 deficient tumors. Additionally, there are now clinical trials involving EZH2 Inhibitors which may offer benefit for similar patients going forward.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the difficulty in making a definitive diagnosis, and the importance in identifying a SMARCB1 deficiency as it will affect treatment options and may allow for enrollment in ongoing clinical trials.