1
|
Morlier LW, Tomkins DF, Koppen B, Declercq B, Weller O, Gregoric A, Focht C, Roberts G, Harbin D, Schreuder RH, Hicks H, Verbist F, Wieland T, Bjorholm T, Manso L, Cohen S, Lee E, Zurcher T, Muller MD, Tomkins DF, Noble A, Schlesinger HD, Smallage B, Tarn KC, Kim YW, Sato T, Schultz DI, Parsons A, Galoux IM, Hussain M, Masollerx FME. Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Glyphosate in Water-Soluble Granular Formulations: Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/80.3.464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
A liquid chromatographic (LC) method for the determination of glyphosate in various water-soluble granular formulations was tested by 28 laboratories. Samples were dissolved in mobile phase and injected directly into an LC system with a 25 cm SAX column and a mobile phase of 96% aqueous buffer solution, 0.0062M KH2PO4, and 4% methanol. Detection was by UV absorption at 195 nm. Manual or automated injections were made via fixed-volume loops. Calculations were based on peak area comparisons with external standards. The collaborative study analyzed 5 matched pairs of 4 water-soluble granular formulations, with one determination per sample. The study generated 138 matched pairs, which were analyzed by using the AOAC spreadsheet and Youden’s matched-pair calculations. Coefficients of variation for the 4 formulations ranged from 0.65 to 1.37%. The LC method for the determination of glyphosate in water-soluble granular formulations has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.
Collapse
|
2
|
|
3
|
Abstract
Abstract
An updated liquid chromatographic (LC) method for the determination of glyphosate in technical material and formulations was tested by 7 laboratories. Samples were dissolved in water and injected into an LC system with a C18 guard column, an anion exchange analytical column, and a phosphate buffer mobile phase with 12 to 15 methanol. Detection was by UV absorption at 195 nm or refractive index. Automated injections were made. Calculations were based on peak area comparisons with external standards. The interlaboratory study analyzed 6 matched pairs of 3 glyphosate technical materials and 3 glyphosate formulations. The matched pair results were analyzed by using the AOAC spreadsheet and Youden's matched pair calculations. Coefficients of variation for the 6 samples ranged from 0.46 to 0.85.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gavlick WK, Tomkins DF. An updated liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of glyphosate in technical material and formulations. J AOAC Int 2008; 91:1-4. [PMID: 18376579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
An updated liquid chromatographic (LC) method for the determination of glyphosate in technical material and formulations was tested by 7 laboratories. Samples were dissolved in water and injected into an LC system with a C18 guard column, an anion exchange analytical column, and a phosphate buffer mobile phase with 12 to 15% methanol. Detection was by UV absorption at 195 nm or refractive index. Automated injections were made. Calculations were based on peak area comparisons with external standards. The interlaboratory study analyzed 6 matched pairs of 3 glyphosate technical materials and 3 glyphosate formulations. The matched pair results were analyzed by using the AOAC spreadsheet and Youden's matched pair calculations. Coefficients of variation for the 6 samples ranged from 0.46 to 0.85%.
Collapse
|
5
|
|
6
|
Abstract
Abstract
A peer-verified gas chromatographic (GC) method is presented for the weight percent (wt %) determination of acetochlor herbicide in technical and formulated products. During method development, the method was found to be rugged by the Youden Ruggedness Test. Two laboratories with experience in the wt % determination of acetochlor in various matrixes participated in this study. Each laboratory received 10 blind duplicate test samples of the following 5 matrixes: one acetochlor technical and 4, different, emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulations—Harness® EC (MON 5841), Harness ® Export/Fist (MON 8435), Surpass® EC (HF), and Surpass ® EC (LF). Each participant was asked to make duplicate weighings of each of the test samples and to inject each test sample solution twice. All test samples were analyzed on the same day, and 8 data points (replicates) per matrix were obtained. The test samples were dissolved in acetone that contained dipentyl phthalate as an internal standard. They were analyzed by GC on a 15 m capillary column by using split injection and a flame ionization detector. Acetochlor (wt %) was determined by comparing the ratios of peak area of acetochlor/peak area of dipentyl phthalate internal standard obtained for the test sample and calibration solutions. Repeatability of the method, expressed as the within-laboratory (between replicates) relative standard deviation (RSDr), was found to be 0.09–0.77% for the 5 matrixes. Reproducibility of the method, expressed as the within-test sample relative standard deviation (RSDR), was found to be 0.18–0.78% for the 5 matrixes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobbi B Kahn
- Zeneca Ag Products, 1200 S 47th St, Richmond, CA 94804-0023,., Tel: +1-510-231-1054, Fax: +1-510-231-5019
| | - David F Tomkins
- Monsanto Co., PO Box 473, Muscatine, IA 52761,., Tel: +1-319-262-7305, Fax: +1-319-262-5667
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kahn BB, Tomkins DF. Determination of acetochlor in technical and formulated products by capillary gas chromatography: PVM 5:1999. J AOAC Int 2001; 84:317-22. [PMID: 11324593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
A peer-verified gas chromatographic (GC) method is presented for the weight percent (wt %) determination of acetochlor herbicide in technical and formulated products. During method development, the method was found to be rugged by the Youden Ruggedness Test. Two laboratories with experience in the wt % determination of acetochlor in various matrixes participated in this study. Each laboratory received 10 blind duplicate test samples of the following 5 matrixes: one acetochlor technical and 4, different, emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulations--Harness EC (MON 5841), Harness Export/Fist (MON 8435), Surpass EC (HF), and Surpass EC (LF). Each participant was asked to make duplicate weighings of each of the test samples and to inject each test sample solution twice. All test samples were analyzed on the same day, and 8 data points (replicates) per matrix were obtained. The test samples were dissolved in acetone that contained dipentyl phthalate as an internal standard. They were analyzed by GC on a 15 m capillary column by using split injection and a flame ionization detector. Acetochlor (wt %) was determined by comparing the ratios of peak area of acetochlor/peak area of dipentyl phthalate internal standard obtained for the test sample and calibration solutions. Repeatability of the method, expressed as the within-laboratory (between replicates) relative standard deviation (RSDr), was found to be 0.09-0.77% for the 5 matrixes. Reproducibility of the method, expressed as the within-test sample relative standard deviation (RSDR), was found to be 0.18-0.78% for the
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B B Kahn
- Zeneca Ag Products, Richmond, CA 94804-0023, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hanks AR, Tomkins DF. Committee on Pesticide and Disinfectant Formulations: Pesticide Formulations: CIPAC Studies, Pesticide Formulations: Herbicides. J AOAC Int 2000. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/83.2.431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alan R Hanks
- Purdue University, Office of Indiana State Chemist, 1154 Biochemistry Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1154, USA
| | - David F Tomkins
- Purdue University, Office of Indiana State Chemist, 1154 Biochemistry Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1154, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Herbicides. J AOAC Int 1999. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/82.2.499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
10
|
Tomkins DF, Rivera L, Knapp P, Mason C, Buddie GC, Gillespie J, NOEL RJ, Slahck SC, Lee JK, Chechik E. Committee on Pesticide and Disinfectant Formulations. J AOAC Int 1998. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/81.1.217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lilia Rivera
- California Dept. of Food and Agriculture, 3292 Meadowview Rd, Sacramento, CA 95832, USA
| | - Paul Knapp
- Arizona Dept. of Agriculture, 2422 W Holly, Phoenix, AZ 85009, USA
| | - Chris Mason
- Nevada State Dept. of Agriculture, 350 Capitol Hill, Reno, NV 89502, USA
| | - G C Buddie
- Agriculture Ltd., Rhone-Poulenc, Fyfield Rd, Ongar Esex, CMS OHW, UK
| | - Jo Gillespie
- Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Central Science Laboratory, Pesticides Safety Directorate, Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2SS, UK
| | - Rod J NOEL
- Purdue University, Office of the Indiana State Chemist, 1154 Biochemistry Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | | | - Jung-Keun Lee
- COMMITTEE STATISTICIAN FDA, 200 C St, SW, HFS 708, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Eugene Chechik
- SAFETY ADVISOR Maryland Dept. of Agriculture, State Chemist Office, Harry S. Truman Highway, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide formulations: herbicides. J AOAC Int 1998. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/81.1.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
12
|
Slahck S, Tomkins DF, Gillespie J, Mason C, Harder D, Noel RJ, Rivera L, Chechik E. Committee on Pesticide and Disinfectant Formulations. J AOAC Int 1997. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/80.1.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Slahck
- Miles, Inc., AgricultureDivision, PO Box 4913, Kansas City, MO 64120, USA
| | | | - Jo Gillespie
- Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Central Science Laboratory, Pesticides Safety Directorate, Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2SS, UK
| | - Chris Mason
- Nevada State Department of Agriculture, 350 Capitol Hill, Reno, NV 89510, USA
| | - Dwight Harder
- Arizona Department of Agriculture, 2422 W Holly, Phoenix, AZ 85009, USA
| | - Rod J Noel
- Purdue University, Office of the Indiana State Chemist, Biochemistry Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Lilia Rivera
- California Department ofFood and Agriculture, 3292 Meadowview Rd, Sacramento, CA 95832, USA
| | - Eugene Chechik
- Maryland Department of Agriculture, State Chemist Office, Harry S. Truman Pkwy, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Herbicides. J AOAC Int 1997. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/80.1.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
14
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Herbicides. J AOAC Int 1996. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/79.1.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
15
|
Slahck SC, Tomkins DF, Mason C, Buddle GC, Gillespie J, Harder D, Noel RJ, Rivera L, Nemeth MA, Chechik E. Committee on Pesticide and Disinfectant Formulations. J AOAC Int 1996. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/79.1.274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen C Slahck
- Miles, Inc., Agriculture Division, PO Box 4913, Kansas City, MO 64120, USA
| | | | - Chris Mason
- Nevada State Department of Agriculture, 350 Capitol Hill, Reno, NV 89510, USA
| | - G C Buddle
- Agriculture Ltd., Rhone-Poulenc, Fyfield Rd, Ongar Essex, CMS OHW, UK
| | - Jo Gillespie
- Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Central Science Laboratory, Pesticides Safety Directorate, Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2SS, UK
| | - Dwight Harder
- Arizona Department of Agriculture, 2422 W Holly, Phoenix, AZ 85009, USA
| | - Rod J Noel
- Purdue University, Office of the Indiana State Chemist, Biochemistry Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Lilia Rivera
- California Department of Food and Agriculture, 3292 Meadowview Rd, Sacramento, CA 95832, USA
| | - Margaret A Nemeth
- Monsanto Agricultural Co., 800 N Lindbergh Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63167, USA
| | - Eugene Chechik
- Maryland Department of Agriculture, State Chemist Office, Harry S. Truman Highway, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Herbicides. J AOAC Int 1995. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/78.1.121a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
17
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Herbicides. J AOAC Int 1994. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/77.1.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
18
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Organohalogen Insecticides; Other Insecticides, Synergists, and Repellents. J AOAC Int 1993. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/76.1.98a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
19
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Herbicides. J AOAC Int 1993. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/76.1.98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
20
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Organohalogen Insecticides; Other Insecticides, Synergists, and Repellents. J AOAC Int 1992. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/75.1.80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
21
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Organohalogen Insecticides; Other Insecticides, Synergists, and Repellents. J AOAC Int 1991. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/74.1.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
22
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Organohalogen Insecticides; Other Insecticides; Synergists, and Repellants. J AOAC Int 1990. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/73.1.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
23
|
Tomkins DF. Pesticide Formulations: Organohalogen Insecticides; Other Insecticides, Synergists, and Repellants. J AOAC Int 1989. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/72.1.63a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
24
|
Slahck SC, Arruda J, Bennett OO, Cheuk H, Elliott RM, Fontanilla AO, Hodgins WE, Hunt J, Jung PD, Lonn P, Pearson PML, Schuld M, Schulz R, Stroh S, Tomkins DF, Updyke JR. Liquid Chromatographic Method for Determination of Anilazine in Formulated Products: Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 1988. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/71.1.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
A liquid chromatographic method for the determination of anilazine (DYRENE®) in formulated products has been developed and subjected to a collaborative study involving 15 participating laboratories. Each collaborator was furnished with reference standard, internal standard, and blind duplicate samples of DYRENE 80% concentrate, 75% wettable powder (75 WP), 50 WP, and 4 flowable formulation. Samples are dissolved in acetonitrile and analyzed by reverse phase chromatography using octanophenone as an internal standard. Collaborators were instructed to evaluate the method by either peak area or peak height measurements. Seven laboratories performed the analyses using peak areas; 8 laboratories used peak heights. Peak area measurements for the wettable powder samples resulted in statistically high bias vs peak height measurements. This was apparently due to inconsistent integration parameters among collaborators. Difficulties in establishing the correct integration parameters are illustrated along with t-test values for the 2 measurement techniques. Coefficients of variation of the peak height values obtained on the 80 concentrate, 75 WP, 50 WP, and 4 flowable were 1.68,1.29,1.74, 1.87%, respectively. The method has been adopted official first action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen C Slahck
- Mobay Corp., Agricultural Chemicals Div., PO Box 4913, Hawthorn Rd, Kansas City, MO 64120-0013
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tomkins DF. Gas Chromatographic Determination of Alachlor in Microencapsulated Formulations: Mini-Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 1987. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/70.6.1056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
An isothermal gas chromatographic method for measuring alachlor in Micro-Tech® (microencapsulated) formulations was tested by 5 collaborators. The samples were prepared in acetone, and alachlor was determined using a gas chromatographic column of 10% SP- 2250 on 100-120 mesh Supelcoport. Di-n-pentylphthalate was used as the internal standard. Collaborators made single determinations on 5 samples distributed as blind duplicates. The mini-collaborative study generated 47 data points. The coefficient of variation (CV„- pooled) was 1.35%, and CVx-pooled was 0.73%. The method was simple to use and did not reveal any interferences in samples tested. The method has been adopted official first action as an AOACCIPAC method.
Collapse
|
26
|
Tomkins DF, Caparoon WC, Galoux IM, Gentry GM, Hodgins WE, Koenig DK, Law MW, Lee B, Liu J, McAfee SE, Spencer DA, Speth RM, Torma L. Gas Chromatographic Determination of Propachlor in Pesticide Formulations: Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 1986. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/69.4.723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
An isothermal gas chromatographic (GC) method for measuring propachlor in formulations was tested by 12 collaborators. Samples are prepared in acetone and determined using a GC column of 10% SP-2250 on 100-200 mesh Supelcoport, and diisobutyl phthalate as internal standard. Collaborators made single determinations on each of 2 similar materials (matched pairs) on 2 days for 3 pairs of samples. The study generated 62 matched pairs which were used in Youden’s matched pair calculations. The coefficients of variation (CV,) for flowable formulations were 0.84 and 1.48%; the CV, for the granular formulation was 1.28%. The method was simple to use and did not reveal any interferences in the samples tested. The method has been adopted official first action as an AOAC-CIPAC method.
Collapse
|
27
|
Tomkins DF, Baird J, Bowermaster J, Brunhouse E, Caparoon WC, Chenery LT, Galoux IM, Gentry GM, Hodgins WE, Jurgens D, Koenig DK, Law MW, Lee B, Liu J, McAfee SE, Spencer DA, Torma L. Gas Chromatographic Determination of Butachlor in Formulations: Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 1986. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/69.4.721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
An isothermal gas chromatographic (GC) method for measuring butachlor in formulations was tested by 15 laboratories. Samples were prepared in acetone and determined using a GC column of 10% SP-2250 on 100-120 mesh Supelcoport, and triphenyl phosphate as internal standard. Collaborators made single determinations on each of 2 similar materials (matched pairs) on 2 days for 2 pairs of samples. The study generated 56 matched pairs which were used in Youden’s matched pair calculations. Coefficients of variation (CV,) for liquid formulations were 1.06 and 0.98%. The method was simple to use and did not reveal any interferences in the samples tested. The method has been adopted official first action as an AOAC-CIPAC method.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tomkins DF. Gas Chromatographic Determination of Alachlor in Formulations: Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 1985. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/68.3.573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
An isothermal gas chromatographic method for measuring alachlor in formulations was tested by 26 collaborators. The samples were prepared in acetone and determined with a gas chromatographic column of 10% SP 2250 on 100-120 mesh Supelcoport and with di-n-pentyl phthalate as internal standard. Collaborators made single determinations on each of 2 similar materials (matched pairs) on 2 days for 3 pairs of samples. The study generated 44 matched pairs which were used in Youden's matched-pair calculations. The coefficients of variation (CV,) for liquid formulations were 1.23% and 0.94%, while the CV, for the granular formulation was 1.60 %. The method was simple to use and did not reveal any interferences in the samples tested. The method has been adopted official first action.
Collapse
|
29
|
Tomkins DF. Analytical profiles of drug substances, vol. 6. Microchem J 1980. [DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(80)90228-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
30
|
Tomkins DF. Spectroscopic methods of identification of microquantities of organic materials. Microchem J 1978. [DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(78)90054-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
31
|
Tomkins DF. Analytical profiles of drug substances. Vol. 5. Microchem J 1978. [DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(78)90055-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
32
|
Tomkins DF. Analytical profiles of drug substances, vol. 3. Microchem J 1975. [DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(75)90098-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
33
|
Tomkins DF. Analytical methods for pesticides and plant growth regulators. Vol. 7. Thin-layer and liquid chromatography analyses of pesticides of international importance. Microchem J 1975. [DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(75)90129-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
34
|
Tomkins DF, Tscherne RJ. Determination of vitamin D 2 in gelatin-protected vitamin A acetate-vitamin D2 beadlets by high pressure liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 1974; 46:1602-4. [PMID: 4547178 DOI: 10.1021/ac60347a045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
35
|
Tomkins DF. Chromatography of environmental hazards. Vol. 1. Microchem J 1974. [DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(74)90079-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
36
|
Tomkins DF. Quantitative thin layer chromatography. Microchem J 1974. [DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(74)90086-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
37
|
Tomkins DF. Trace analysis by mass spectrometry. Microchem J 1973. [DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(73)90128-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
38
|
|