Real-Time Precision Needle Tracking for Gynecological Interstitial Brachytherapy: A Phantom Feasibility Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To determine if an advanced needle navigation and real-time precision tracking system developed for prostate biopsies can be used for the purpose of real-time guidance of interstitial needles in modern image-guided gynecologic brachytherapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

An agarose gel pelvic phantom was previously designed using 3D Slicer and Autodesk Fusion360 to model an average uterus from a 50-patient dataset, a vaginal canal from KleenSpec (TM, Welch Allyn) speculum dimensions, and a rectum to accommodate a BK 8848 endocavity biplane ultrasound [US] probe. After manufacturing the phantom with a 7.2cm x 3.7cm x 4.4cm (LxWxH) uterus and an attached 2.7cm x 1.4cmx 1.7cm (LxWxH) focal HR-CTV target, the model was imaged using MRI. The uterus and HR-CTV were contoured on MRI to aid in registration with US and provide a target for needle placement. The tracking system with endorectal probe was then used to image the phantom. Ultrasound images from a 180-degree sweep were acquired and a 3D Ultrasound-based volume was generated. Using the commercially available system, the MRI was imported and an MRI-Ultrasound fusion performed based on the uterus contours and then refined using contour-based deformable registration. Three desired locations for needle placement were defined to test the ability of the system to guide needles at these locations: one in the most lateral aspect of the HRCTV, one at the HRCTV-uterus interface, and one inside the uterus. The needle tracking sleeve that was indexed to the probe was used in conjunction with the software interface to guide the 17-gauge titanium needle placement in real time. The distance between actual needle and the intended needle location was measured for each successful needle placement. When possible, needles were removed and reinserted at the same desired location to test the reproducibility of insertion under US guidance.

RESULTS

Two of the three intended needles were successfully placed using real-time US guidance. The most lateral needle in the HRCTV was not inserted due to limitations of the phantom design, specifically inaccessibility to the agarose phantom through the phantom wall supports. The inserted needles were visible and tracked to the desired location within 0.6 mm (needle located at HRCTV-uterus interface), and 2.2 mm (needles inserted centrally in the uterus). For the target within the uterus, needles were reinserted at the same target of interest with a ∆ 0.15mm in greatest range between attempts.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated a proof of concept in which existing technology for prostate biopsies can be utilized for the application of interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy with a high degree of fidelity. Ongoing modifications to our validation phantom and the tracking system are needed to allow for variations in uterine anatomy, more rigorous evaluation of reproducibility, and multi-catheter placement.

Is it time for bone marrow sparing radiation therapy to be standard of care in cervical cancer?

Evaluating a recent prospective trial of active bone marrow sparing defined by 99mTc‐single‐photon emission computed tomography imaging in the landscape of the existing literature.

Effect of COVID-19 on Gynecologic Oncology Care: A Survey of Practicing Gynecologic Radiation Oncologists in the United States

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed demands and limitations on the delivery of health care. We sought to assess the effect of COVID-19 on the delivery of gynecologic oncologic care from the perspective of practicing radiation oncologists in the United States.

Methods and Materials

An anonymous online survey was created and distributed to preidentified radiation oncologists in the United States with clinical expertise in the management of gynecologic patients. The survey consisted of demographic questions followed by directed questions to assess specific patterns of care related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

A total of 47 of 96 invited radiation oncologists responded to the survey for a response rate of 49%. Fifty-six percent of respondents reported an increase in locally advanced cervical cancer with no similar increase for endometrial, vulvar, or vaginal patients. Most respondents (66%) reported a pause in surgical management, with a duration of 1 to 3 months being most common (61%). There was a reported increased use of shorter brachytherapy regimens during the pandemic. Most providers (61%) reported caring for at least 1 patient with a positive COVID-19 test. A pause or delay in treatment due to COVID-19 positivity was reported by 45% of respondents, with 55% reporting that patients chose to delay their own care because of COVID-19-related concerns. Total treatment times >8 weeks for patients with cervical cancer were observed by 33% of respondents, but occurred in >25% of patients.

Conclusions

Data from this prospectively collected anonymous survey of practice patterns among radiation oncologists reveal that the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in delays initiating care, truncated brachytherapy treatment courses, and a reported increase in locally advanced cervical cancer cases at presentation. These data can be used as a means of self-assessment to ensure appropriate decision making for gynecologic patients during the endemic phase of COVID-19.

What is appropriate target delineation for MRI-based brachytherapy for medically inoperable endometrial cancer?

PURPOSE

For medically inoperable endometrial cancer (MIEC), the volumetric target of image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) techniques is not well established. We propose a high-risk CTV (HRCTV) concept and report associated rates of local control and toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For all MIEC patients receiving definitive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by MRI-based IGBT at a single institution, BT dose was prescribed to HRCTV defined as GTV plus endometrial cavity with a planning goal of a summed EQD2 D90 of ≥85 Gy. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

Thirty two MIEC patients received EBRT followed by MRI-based IGBT between December 2015 and August 2020. Median follow up was 19.8 months. A total of 75% of patients had FIGO stage I/II disease, 56% endometrioid histology, and 50% grade 3 disease. OS was 73.6% (95% CI 57.8%-89.3%) at 12 months and 65.8% (95% CI 48.4%-83.2%) at 24 months. FFLP was 93.8% (95% CI 85.3%-100%) at 12 months and 88.8% (95% CI 86.6%-91.0%) at 24 months. 23 (72%) patients experienced no RT-related toxicity, while 2 of 32 patients (6%) experienced late grade 3+ toxicities (grade 3 refractory vomiting; grade 5 GI bleed secondary to RT-induced proctitis).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MIEC receiving definitive EBRT followed by MRI-based IGBT prescribed to the MRI-defined HRCTV demonstrated favorable long-term local control with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Multi-institutional validation of brain metastasis velocity, a recently defined predictor of outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastasis velocity (BMV) is a prognostic metric that describes the recurrence rate of new brain metastases after initial treatment with radiosurgery (SRS). We have previously risk stratified patients into high, intermediate, and low-risk BMV groups, which correlates with overall survival (OS). We sought to externally validate BMV in a multi-institutional setting.

METHODS

Patients from nine academic centers were treated with upfront SRS; the validation cohort consisted of data from eight institutions not previously used to define BMV. Patients were classified by BMV into low (<4 BMV), intermediate (4-13 BMV), and high-risk groups (>13 BMV). Time-to-event outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards methods were used to estimate the effect of BMV and salvage modality on OS.

RESULTS

Of 2829 patients, 2092 patients were included in the validation dataset. Of these, 921 (44.0%) experienced distant brain failure (DBF). Median OS from initial SRS was 11.2 mo. Median OS for BMV < 4, BMV 4-13, and BMV > 13 were 12.5 mo, 7.0 mo, and 4.6 mo (p < 0.0001). After multivariate regression modeling, melanoma histology (β: 10.10, SE: 1.89, p < 0.0001) and number of initial brain metastases (β: 1.52, SE: 0.34, p < 0.0001) remained predictive of BMV (adjusted R² = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This multi-institutional dataset validates BMV as a predictor of OS following initial SRS. BMV is being utilized in upcoming multi-institutional randomized controlled trials as a stratification variable for salvage whole brain radiation versus salvage SRS after DBF.

Prediction of new brain metastases after radiosurgery: validation and analysis of performance of a multi-institutional nomogram

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases can avoid WBRT toxicities, but with risk of subsequent distant brain failure (DBF). Sole use of number of metastases to triage patients may be an unrefined method. Data on 1354 patients treated with SRS monotherapy from 2000 to 2013 for new brain metastases was collected across eight academic centers. The cohort was divided into training and validation datasets and a prognostic model was developed for time to DBF. We then evaluated the discrimination and calibration of the model within the validation dataset, and confirmed its performance with an independent contemporary cohort. Number of metastases (≥8, HR 3.53 p = 0.0001), minimum margin dose (HR 1.07 p = 0.0033), and melanoma histology (HR 1.45, p = 0.0187) were associated with DBF. A prognostic index derived from the training dataset exhibited ability to discriminate patients' DBF risk within the validation dataset (c-index = 0.631) and Heller's explained relative risk (HERR) = 0.173 (SE = 0.048). Absolute number of metastases was evaluated for its ability to predict DBF in the derivation and validation datasets, and was inferior to the nomogram. A nomogram high-risk threshold yielding a 2.1-fold increased need for early WBRT was identified. Nomogram values also correlated to number of brain metastases at time of failure (r = 0.38, p < 0.0001). We present a multi-institutionally validated prognostic model and nomogram to predict risk of DBF and guide risk-stratification of patients who are appropriate candidates for radiosurgery versus upfront WBRT.

Impact of systemic targeted agents on the clinical outcomes of patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

To determine the clinical benefits of systemic targeted agents across multiple histologies after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2013, 737 patients underwent upfront SRS for brain metastases. Patients were stratified by whether or not they received targeted agents with SRS. 167 (23%) received targeted agents compared to 570 (77%) that received other available treatment options. Time to event data were summarized using Kaplan-Meier plots, and the log rank test was used to determine statistical differences between groups.

RESULTS

Patients who received SRS with targeted agents vs those that did not had improved overall survival (65% vs. 30% at 12 months, p < 0.0001), improved freedom from local failure (94% vs 90% at 12 months, p = 0.06), improved distant failure-free survival (32% vs. 18% at 12 months, p = 0.0001) and improved freedom from whole brain radiation (88% vs. 77% at 12 months, p = 0.03). Improvement in freedom from local failure was driven by improvements seen in breast cancer (100% vs 92% at 12 months, p < 0.01), and renal cell cancer (100% vs 88%, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that use of targeted agents improved all cause mortality (HR = 0.6, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted agent use with SRS appears to improve survival and intracranial outcomes.

Is a Clinical Target Volume (CTV) Necessary in the Treatment of Lung Cancer in the Modern Era Combining 4-D Imaging and Image-guided Radiotherapy (IGRT)?

Objective: We hypothesized that omission of clinical target volumes (CTV) in lung cancer radiotherapy would not compromise control by determining retrospectively if the addition of a CTV would encompass the site of failure.

Methods: Stage II-III patients were treated from 2009-2012 with daily cone-beam imaging and a 5 mm planning target volume (PTV) without a CTV. PTVs were expanded 1 cm and termed CTVretro. Recurrences were scored as 1) within the PTV, 2) within CTVretro, or 3) outside the PTV. Locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated.

Result: Among 110 patients, Stage IIIA 57%, IIIB 32%, IIA 4%, and IIB 7%. Eighty-six percent of Stage III patients received chemotherapy. Median dose was 70 Gy (45-74 Gy) and fraction size ranged from 1.5-2.7 Gy. Median follow-up was 12 months, median OS was 22 months (95% CI 19-30 months), and LRC at two years was 69%. Fourteen local and eight regional events were scored with two CTVretro failures equating to a two-year CTV failure-free survival of 98%.

Conclusion: Omission of a 1 cm CTV expansion appears feasible based on only two events among 110 patients and should be considered in radiation planning.

The multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of rectal cancer: 2015 update

The multidisciplinary approach to the management of rectal cancer continues to evolve with developments in surgery, radiation therapy as well as systemic chemotherapy. Refinement of surgical techniques to improve organ preservation, selective use of neoadjuvant (or adjuvant) therapies, improvements in staging modalities and emerging criteria for the selection of tailored therapies are some of the advancements made over the last three decades. In addition, neoadjuvant treatment alternatives, multimodality sequencing and adaptive therapies based on treatment response continue to be a subject of clinical investigation. The current article reviews the salient topics related to the multidisciplinary treatment of resectable rectal cancer.

Risk factors for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with brain metastases who have previously undergone stereotactic radiosurgery

Our objective was to explore the hypothesis that the risk of leptomeningeal dissemination (LMD) in patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is influenced by the site of the primary cancer, the addition of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgical resection, and control over their systemic disease. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 805 patients who were treated with SRS for brain metastases between 1999 and 2012 at the Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, and excluded all patients with evidence of LMD before SRS. The primary outcome was LMD. Forty-nine of 795 patients developed LMD with a cumulative incidence of 6.2% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 4.7-8.0). Median time from SRS to LMD was 7.4 months (Interquartile Range (IQR), 3.3-15.4). A colorectal primary site (Hazard Ratio (HR), 4.5; 95% CI 2.5-8.0; p < 0.0001), distant brain failure (HR, 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.2; p = 0.007), breast primary site (HR, 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.7; p = 0.05), the number of intracranial metastases at time of initial SRS (HR, 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.02), and age (by 5-year interval) (HR, 0.9; 95% CI 0.8, 0.9; p = 0.0006) were independent factors associated with LMD. There was no evidence that surgical resection before SRS altered the risk of LMD (HR, 1.1; 95 % CI 0.6-2.0, p = 0.78). In patients who underwent SRS for brain metastases, a colorectal or breast primary site, distant brain failure, younger age, and an increased number of intracranial metastases were independently associated with LMD. Given its relative rarity as an outcome, multi-institutional prospective studies will likely be necessary to validate and quantify these relationships.

A nomogram for predicting distant brain failure in patients treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery without whole brain radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

We review our single institution experience to determine predictive factors for early and delayed distant brain failure (DBF) after radiosurgery without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2010, a total of 464 patients were treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) without WBRT for primary management of newly diagnosed brain metastases. Histology, systemic disease, RPA class, and number of metastases were evaluated as possible predictors of DBF rate. DBF rates were determined by serial MRI. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate rate of DBF. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox Proportional Hazard regression.

RESULTS

Median number of lesions treated was 1 (range 1-13). Median time to DBF was 4.9 months. Twenty-seven percent of patients ultimately required WBRT with median time to WBRT of 5.6 months. Progressive systemic disease (χ(2)= 16.748, P < .001), number of metastases at SRS (χ(2) = 27.216, P < .001), discovery of new metastases at time of SRS (χ(2) = 9.197, P < .01), and histology (χ(2) = 12.819, P < .07) were factors that predicted for earlier time to distant failure. High risk histologic subtypes (melanoma, her2 negative breast, χ(2) = 11.020, P < .001) and low risk subtypes (her2 + breast, χ(2) = 11.343, P < .001) were identified. Progressive systemic disease (χ(2) = 9.549, P < .01), number of brain metastases (χ(2) = 16.953, P < .001), minimum SRS dose (χ(2) = 21.609, P < .001), and widespread metastatic disease (χ(2) = 29.396, P < .001) were predictive of shorter time to WBRT.

CONCLUSION

Systemic disease, number of metastases, and histology are factors that predict distant failure rate after primary radiosurgical management of brain metastases.

Clinical and economic outcomes of patients with brain metastases based on symptoms: an argument for routine brain screening of those treated with upfront radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Insurers have started to deny reimbursement for routine brain surveillance with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases in favor of symptom-prompted imaging. The authors investigated the clinical and economic impact of symptomatic versus asymptomatic metastases and related these findings to the use of routine brain surveillance.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2010, 442 patients underwent upfront SRS for brain metastases. In total, 127 asymptomatic patients and 315 symptomatic patients were included. Medical records were used to determine the presenting symptoms, distant and local brain failure, retreatment, and need for hospital and rehabilitative care. Cost-of-care estimates were based on Medicare payment rates as of January 2013.

RESULTS

Symptomatic patients had an increased hazard for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.448) and were more likely to experience neurologic death (42% vs 20%; P < .0001). Relative to asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients required more craniotomies (43% vs 5%; P < .0001), had more prolonged hospitalization (2 vs 0 days; P < .0001), were more likely to have Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3 and 4 post-treatment symptoms (24% vs 5%; P < .0001), and required $11,957 more on average to manage per patient. Accounting for all-cause mortality rates and the probability of diagnosis at each follow-up period, the authors estimated that insurers would save an average $1326 per patient by covering routine surveillance MRI after SRS to detect asymptomatic metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who presented with symptomatic brain metastases had worse clinical outcomes and cost more to manage than asymptomatic patients. The current findings argue that routine brain surveillance after radiosurgery has clinical benefits and reduces the cost of care.