1
|
Baker J, Barnett C, Cavalli L, Dietrich M, Dixon L, Duffy JR, Elias A, Fraser DE, Freeburn JL, Gregory C, McKenzie K, Miller N, Patterson J, Roth C, Roy N, Short J, Utianski R, van Mersbergen M, Vertigan A, Carson A, Stone J, McWhirter L. Management of functional communication, swallowing, cough and related disorders: consensus recommendations for speech and language therapy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92:1112-1125. [PMID: 34210802 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Communication problems (eg, dysphonia, dysfluency and language and articulation disorders), swallowing disorders (dysphagia and globus), cough and upper airway symptoms, resulting from functional neurological disorder (FND), are commonly encountered by speech and language professionals. However, there are few descriptions in the literature of the most effective practical management approaches. This consensus document aims to provide recommendations for assessment and intervention that are relevant to both adults and young people. An international panel of speech and language professionals with expertise in FND were approached to take part. Participants responded individually by email to a set of key questions regarding best practice for assessment and interventions. Next, a video conference was held in which participants discussed and debated the answers to these key questions, aiming to achieve consensus on each issue. Drafts of the collated consensus recommendations were circulated until consensus was achieved. FND should be diagnosed on the basis of positive clinical features. Speech and language therapy for FND should address illness beliefs, self-directed attention and abnormal movement patterns through a process of education, symptomatic treatment and cognitive behavioural therapy within a supportive therapeutic environment. We provide specific examples of these strategies for different symptoms. Speech and language professionals have a key role in the management of people with communication and related symptoms of FND. It is intended that these expert recommendations serve as both a practical toolkit and a starting point for further research into evidence-based treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Baker
- Speech Pathology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caroline Barnett
- South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, Warwickshire, UK
| | - Lesley Cavalli
- Department of Speech & Language Therapy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, London, UK
| | - Maria Dietrich
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Lorna Dixon
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, London, UK
| | - Joseph R Duffy
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Annie Elias
- Speech and Language Therapy, Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust, Ashford, Kent, UK
| | - Diane E Fraser
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | - Nick Miller
- Speech Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Jo Patterson
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| | - Carole Roth
- Speech Pathology Division, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Nelson Roy
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (Adjunct), The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Rene Utianski
- Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Speech Pathology and Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Miriam van Mersbergen
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Institute for Intelligent Systems, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Anne Vertigan
- Speech Pathology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute; School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alan Carson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jon Stone
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Laura McWhirter
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fraser DE, Murphy JP, Leath S, Van Sanford DA. Effect of Inoculation with Selected Isolates of Stagonospora nodorum on Field Evaluations of Host Resistance in Winter Wheat. Plant Dis 2003; 87:1213-1220. [PMID: 30812725 DOI: 10.1094/pdis.2003.87.10.1213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Although Stagonospora nodorum blotch occurs annually in North Carolina, selection for resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) breeding nurseries is hampered by the infrequent occurrence of heavy and timely disease pressure. The objective of this study was to compare estimates of host resistance in a population of 147 random winter wheat lines evaluated in epidemics produced by natural infection versus epidemics supplemented by inoculation with selected isolates. Two isolates were chosen from a set of 43 collected in North Carolina based on their aggressiveness on four wheat cultivars in a controlled environment test. Field experiments utilized a split-plot design with three replications. The main plots were inoculation treatments and the subplots were the 147 wheat genotypes. The inoculation treatments were (i) selected isolate A (more aggressive) alone, (ii) selected isolate B (less aggressive) alone, (iii) a combination of isolates A plus B, and (iv) natural infection. Selected isolate treatments were applied at Feekes growth stage 9 to 10.1, and disease intensity was measured two or three times at 14-day intervals postinoculation. The study was conducted at one location in the 1996-97 season and two locations in the 1997-98 season. High levels of natural infection occurred, and no differences were observed among the four inoculation treatments for mean disease intensity in any of the three environments. Within environments, genotype-by-inoculation treatment variance was significant in the two environments inoculated with selected isolates at growth stage 9 but not in the environment inoculated at growth stage 10.1. Magnitudes of genetic variation and heritability for Stagonospora nodorum blotch resistance were not consistently associated with main plot treatments, and inoculation with selected isolates masked genetic variation for resistance in two treatments in one environment. Genotype rank correlations for Stagonospora nodorum blotch resistance between inoculation treatments varied from zero to 0.69 within environments, but only a single correlation between inoculation treatments in different environments was observed. Estimates of host resistance in epidemics supplemented with selected isolates did not consistently agree with estimates in epidemics produced by natural infection. Our results did not support the routine use of supplemental inoculation of wheat breeding nurseries with selected isolates of S. nodorum as a means of increasing genetic gain for host resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D E Fraser
- Delta and Pine Land Company, Hartsville, SC 29550
| | | | - S Leath
- Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
| | - D A Van Sanford
- Department of Agronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546
| |
Collapse
|