Cardiac arrest: should we consider norepinephrine instead of epinephrine?

A patient scheduled for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy had an anaphylactic shock during induction of anesthesia. After the injection of vecuronium, an unusual fall of arterial pressure occurred, with bradycardia, enlargement of the QRS complex, then a circulatory arrest. Chest compressions were initiated, while intravenous epinephrine 1 mg was administered. The cardiac rhythm turned into a ventricular fibrillation (VF). Despite continuous chest compressions with repeated boluses of epinephrine and several external electric shocks, the patient remained in VF. Because of obviously β-adrenergic adverse effects, epinephrine was replaced with norepinephrine. Return of spontaneous circulation was observed, with the recovering of sinusal activity. After staying for several weeks in intensive care unit because of multiorgan failure, the patient recovered without sequelae. Blood samples and cutaneous testing confirmed an allergy to vecuronium. This case report of a cardiac anaphylaxis with prolonged cardiac arrest illustrates the dual activity and adverse effects of epinephrine. Although vasoconstriction is mandated during cardiopulmonary resuscitation to provide an acceptable perfusion pressure to organs, β-adrenergic stimulation seems deleterious to the heart. Experimental studies have shown that blocking the β-adrenergic effects of epinephrine attenuates postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction or helps the return of spontaneous circulation after VF. Norepinephrine, a potent α-adrenergic drug nearly devoid of β-adrenergic properties, could be an interesting alternative to epinephrine. It can improve organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and could be more efficient than epinephrine in case of VF.

Reduction of the severe sepsis or septic shock associated mortality by reinforcement of the recommendations bundle: a multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

We determined whether the implementation of a bundle of 10 recommendations leads to the reduction of mortality in ICU patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

All patients with severe sepsis or septic shock during two consecutive phases: a 6-month quality control period (observational) and secondly a 6-month intervention period based on the implementation of a bundle of 10 recommendations adapted from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (initial bacteriological samples and initiating antibiotics, measurement of arterial lactate, volume expansion > or =20 ml/kg, targeted mean arterial pressure > or =65 mmHg and the assessments of central venous pressure and Scv(O2); glucose control, low doses of corticosteroids, a tidal volume < or =8 ml/kg in mechanically ventilated patients with ALI; adequate use of recombinant human activated protein C) were evaluated in 15 ICUs. The primary endpoint was the 28-day mortality rate and the secondary endpoint was the compliance with the recommendations of the care bundle.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-five patients (230 and 215 in the observational and intervention periods, respectively) were included. In the two periods, the patients had similar characteristics. The 28-day mortality rate significantly decreased from 40% in the observational period to 27% in the intervention period (P=0.02). According to each recommendation, compliance with the care bundle was achieved in 9 to 100% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a care bundle adapted from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines decreases the 28-day mortality rate in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock.

Half the family members of intensive care unit patients do not want to share in the decision-making process: A study in 78 French intensive care units*

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the opinions of intensive care unit staff and family members about family participation in decisions about patients in intensive care units in France, a country where the approach of physicians to patients and families has been described as paternalistic.

DESIGN

Prospective multiple-center survey of intensive care unit staff and family members.

SETTING

Seventy-eight intensive care units in university-affiliated hospitals in France.

PATIENTS

We studied 357 consecutive patients hospitalized in the 78 intensive care units and included in the study starting on May 1, 2001, with five patients included per intensive care unit.

INTERVENTIONS

We recorded opinions and experience about family participation in medical decision making. Comprehension, satisfaction, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were determined in family members.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Poor comprehension was noted in 35% of family members. Satisfaction was good but anxiety was noted in 73% and depression in 35% of family members. Among intensive care unit staff members, 91% of physicians and 83% of nonphysicians believed that participation in decision making should be offered to families; however, only 39% had actually involved family members in decisions. A desire to share in decision making was expressed by only 47% of family members. Only 15% of family members actually shared in decision making. Effectiveness of information influenced this desire.

CONCLUSION

Intensive care unit staff should seek to determine how much autonomy families want. Staff members must strive to identify practical and psychological obstacles that may limit their ability to promote autonomy. Finally, they must develop interventions and attitudes capable of empowering families.

[Visceral form of human anthrax imported from Africa]

Widespread vaccination has largely eliminated anthrax in Europe (the last case was reported in France in 1972) but the disease remains endemic in many developing countries. The usual cutaneous presentation (malignant pustules) is much more familiar than the various visceral manifestations including digestive tract, pulmonary or meningeal signs. We report a case of a 33-year-old immigrant living in France who was hospitalized for asthenia, dyspnoea, mucopurulant expectoration and moderate diarrhoea 3 days after a 3-month stay in Senegal and Gambia. The temperature was 39 degrees C at admission and blood pressure 110/70 mmHg. Crepitants were heard at the base of the right lung and the rest of the physical examination was normal. Blood was drawn for culture. Laboratory tests and the chest X-ray led to the diagnosis of pneumopathy and a treatment of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid was given with oxygenotherapy. The patient's temperature returned to normal but over the next 48 hours the dyspnoea worsened together with the black diarrhoea. The abdomen was painful. There were no skin lesions. The chest X-ray revealed an extension of the bilateral pulmonary images and bilateral pleural effusion. Laboratory tests revealed thrombopenia (platelet count 38,000/mm3) hyperleukocytosis (WBC 48,000/mm3) and haemolysis (Hb 4 milligrams). The diagnosis was made on the basis of the initial blood cultures which were positive for Bacillus anthracis. All other samples were negative, including HIV serology. Despite adapted antibiotic therapy (penicillin G, 8MU/day, was initiated on day 2), multiple organ failure occurred with septic shock and pulmonary oedema. The patient died in the intensive care unit on day 7. Fatal outcome due to anthrax is described in 25% of the visceral forms but reaches 100% in cases of septicaemia. The haemolysis observed in this case is not mentioned in the classical descriptions of anthrax. When treating septic syndromes in patients who have returned from endemic zones, clinicians should entertain the diagnosis of anthrax since the risk of fatal outcome is increased greatly in case of delayed diagnosis.