An evaluation of homesickness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the quantitative literature on homesickness in children, including how it is assessed and relationship to other negative states.

STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS

A literature search was conducted using Medline, PsychINFO and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they assessed homesickness in children under eighteen years of age and were published in peer reviewed journals in the English language between 1990 and December 2020. A total of 176 studies were screened for relevance and 17 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review with five studies included in the meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was homesickness severity, and it was examined in relation to measures of depression and anxiety. The literature in relation to known risk and protective factors was also reviewed.

RESULTS

Homesickness was reported in the majority of children who were separated from their home. It was associated with negative emotional states. A total of seventeen studies were included in the quantitative review. The meta-analysis showed a significant relationship between homesickness and depression r=0.431 (95% CI 0.344-0.510; p<0.001) and homesickness and anxiety r=0.426 (95% CI 0.369-0.479; p<0.001). Age was not a significant moderator of homesickness severity. Consideration of effective interventions to address homesickness was limited.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Homesickness significantly impacts children's well-being regardless of age and is associated with overall distress, depression and anxiety. Future studies are required to examine homesickness interventions and supports to improve well-being in children.

A transdiagnostic examination of anxiety and stress on executive function outcomes in disorders with social impairment

BACKGROUND

Executive function (EF) difficulties characterise a number of psychiatric conditions and EF impairment may be a predisposing factor and/or consequence of anxiety and stress. The aim of the study was to examine EF factors in a mixed clinical cohort (Autism Spectrum Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder) characterised by social impairment and investigate the influence of trait anxiety and state-based depression, anxiety and stress.

METHODS

In Study 1, a factor analysis identified EF and non-EF latent factor structures (N=205). In Study 2, (N=137) multiple regression analyses investigated the association between trait anxiety and state based depression, anxiety and stress, on EF and non-EF cognitive domains and on the two composite indices of the Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF).

RESULTS

Trait anxiety was associated with better performance on neuropsychological measures of EF while state-based stress was associated with lower EF performance. A dissociation was observed between trait anxiety and state stress on the two behavioural indices of the BRIEF. Depression, anxiety and stress did not predict performance on non-EF cognitive domains.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional design precludes cause-effect conclusions, further only self-report measures of affect were utilised and our performance measures of EF did not include a working memory test.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that trait anxiety and state-based stress influence EF processes across disorders with social impairment. The transdiagnostic efficacy of this finding can facilitate remediation strategies, it may also contribute to individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder gaining better access to mental health services.