Efficacy and safety of extended dosing schedules of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

CC-486, the oral formulation of azacitidine (AZA), is an epigenetic modifier and DNA methyltransferase inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of hematologic malignancies. CC-486 administered for 7 days per 28-day treatment cycle was evaluated in a phase 1 dose-finding study. AZA has a short plasma half-life and DNA incorporation is S-phase-restricted; extending CC-486 exposure may increase the number of AZA-affected diseased target cells and maximize therapeutic effects. Patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) received 300 mg CC-486 once daily for 14 days (n=28) or 21 days (n=27) of repeated 28-day cycles. Median patient age was 72 years (range 31–87) and 75% of patients had International Prognostic Scoring System Intermediate-1 risk MDS. Median number of CC-486 treatment cycles was 7 (range 2–24) for the 14-day dosing schedule and 6 (1–24) for the 21-day schedule. Overall response (complete or partial remission, red blood cell (RBC) or platelet transfusion independence (TI), or hematologic improvement) (International Working Group 2006) was attained by 36% of patients receiving 14-day dosing and 41% receiving 21-day dosing. RBC TI rates were similar with both dosing schedules (31% and 38%, respectively). CC-486 was generally well-tolerated. Extended dosing schedules of oral CC-486 may provide effective long-term treatment for patients with lower-risk MDS.

The pharmacokinetics of azacitidine following subcutaneous treatment in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)

7087

Background: 5-azacitidine (AZA), through its effects on DNA metabolism, gene expression, and cell differentiation, has proven beneficial in treatment of MDS and AML and AZA therapy significantly increases survival in higher-risk MDS and AML compared to conventional care. Few studies have evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of AZA and the renal elimination of AZA has not been previously published to our knowledge. Plasma PK of AZA are herein reported in patients receiving SC doses of 75 mg/m2. This study was designed to also assess the contribution of renal elimination to the overall clearance of AZA. Methods: Adult patients with MDS or AML and ECOG status 0–2 were treated with 7 consecutive daily SC doses of 75 mg/m2 AZA during their first treatment cycle. PK parameters of AZA were derived from drug concentrations in plasma and urine collected after the first and last dose (day 7) of AZA. Safety was evaluated by adverse event reporting (NCI-CTC). Results: Currently, 18 patients have been treated with SC AZA. AZA was rapidly absorbed and reached peak plasma concentrations (concs) within 0.5 hr post dosing. The AUCinf after SC doses was 1170 hr*ng/mL. The AZA concs declined in a pseudo bi-phasic manner with an elimination half-life of 1.25 hours. The plasma PK profiles after the first and last dose were superimposable. The apparent total clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vd/F) were 143 L/hr and 318 L, respectively. AZA recovery in urine was very small relative to dose (<2%). AZA was well tolerated and no unexpected toxicities were observed. Conclusions: The AZA AUCinf after SC doses is similar to the published AUC value (1044 hr*ng/mL) after 75 mg/m2 IV doses indicating approximating 100% systemic bioavailability. After SC dosing, CL/F exceeded hepatic blood flow indicating extra-hepatic metabolism. Vd/F was 4–5 fold greater than total body water suggesting extensive AZA tissue distribution. Renal elimination appears to play a minor role in the overall clearance of AZA.

[Table: see text]