3D volume growth rate evaluation in the EORTC-BTG-1320 clinical trial for recurrent WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that tumor 3D volume growth rate (3DVGR) classification could help in the assessment of drug activity in patients with meningioma using three main classes and a total of five subclasses: class 1: decrease; 2: stabilization or severe slowdown; 3: progression. The EORTC-BTG-1320 clinical trial was a randomized phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of trabectedin for recurrent WHO 2 or 3 meningioma. Our objective was to evaluate the discriminative value of 3DVGR classification in the EORTC-BTG-1320.

METHODS

All patients with at least one available MRI before trial inclusion were included. 3D volume was evaluated on consecutive MRI until progression. 2D imaging response was centrally assessed by MRI modified Macdonald criteria. Clinical benefit was defined as neurological or functional status improvement or steroid decrease or discontinuation.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with a median age of 58.5 years were included. Best 3DVGR classes were: 1, 2A, 3A and 3B in 2 (16.7%), 4 (33.3%), 2 (16.7%) and 4 (33.3%) patients, respectively. All patients with progression-free survival longer than 6 months had best 3DVGR class 1 or 2. 3DVGR classes 1 and 2 (combined) had a median overall survival of 34.7 months versus 7.2 months for class 3 (p=0.061). All class 1 patients (2/2), 75% of class 2 patients (3/4) and only 10% of class 3 patients (1/10) had clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor 3DVGR classification may be helpful to identify early signals of treatment activity in meningioma clinical trials.

Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

•This Clinical Practice Guideline provides recommendations for managing leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumours. •The guideline covers clinical, imaging and cytological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •A treatment and management algorithm is provided. •The author panel encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.

P09.03.A Associations of levetiracetam use with the safety and tolerability of chemoradiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Background

Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the most frequently used antiepileptic drugs (AED) for brain tumor patients with seizures. We hypothesized that toxicity of LEV and temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy may overlap.

Patients and Methods

In a retrospective analysis of individual patient data using a pooled cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma included in clinical trials prior to chemoradiotherapy (CENTRIC, CORE, AVAglio) or prior to maintenance therapy (ACT-IV), we tested associations of hematologic toxicity, nausea or emesis, fatigue, and psychiatric adverse events during concomitant and maintenance treatment with the use of LEV alone or with other AED versus other AED alone or in combination versus no AED use at the start of chemoradiotherapy and of maintenance treatment.

Results

Of 1681 and 2020 patients who started concomitant chemoradiotherapy and maintenance temozolomide, respectively, 473 and 714 patients (28.1% and 35.3%) were treated with a LEV-containing regimen, 538 and 475 patients (32.0% and 23.5%) with other AED, and 670 and 831 patients (39.9% and 41.1%) had no AED. LEV was associated with higher risk of psychiatric adverse events during concomitant treatment in univariable and multivariable analyses (RR 1.86 and 1.88, p<0.001) while there were no associations with hematologic toxicity, nausea or emesis, or fatigue. LEV was associated with reduced risk of nausea or emesis during maintenance treatment in multivariable analysis (HR=0.80, p=0.017) while there were no associations with hematologic toxicity, fatigue, or psychiatric adverse events.

Conclusion

Any association of psychiatric adverse events with LEV did not persist beyond the concomitant treatment phase. Antiemetic properties of LEV may be beneficial during the maintenance temozolomide.

P11.63.B Thrombocytopenia limits the feasibility of salvage lomustine chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a secondary analysis of EORTC 26101

Background

Chemotherapies used for the treatment of primary brain tumors frequently induce hematological toxicity. Thrombocytopenia represents the main cause of stopping chemotherapy for toxicity. Here we explored the incidence, and the consequences for treatment exposure and survival, of thrombocytopenia induced by lomustine chemotherapy at first recurrence of glioblastoma.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of thrombocytopenia at first recurrence of glioblastoma, its consequences for treatment delivery, and associations with outcome in the phase II and III parts of EORTC 26101, a randomized trial designed to define the role of lomustine versus bevacizumab versus their combination in glioblastoma patients at first relapse.

Results

225 patients were treated with lomustine alone (median 1 cycle) (group 1) and 283 patients were treated with lomustine plus bevacizumab (median 3 lomustine cycles) (group 2). Among cycle delays and dose reductions of lomustine for toxicity, thrombocytopenia was the leading cause. Among 129 patients of group 1 and 187 patients of group 2 experiencing at least one episode of thrombocytopenia, 36 patients in group 1 and 93 in group 2 had their treatment modified because of thrombocytopenia. Lomustine was discontinued for thrombocytopenia in 16 patients (7.1%) in group 1 and in 38 patients (13.4%) in group 2. Patients with O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter-methylated glioblastoma treated with lomustine alone experienced more interference with study treatment than patients with tumors without MGMT promoter methylation. On adjusted analysis accounting for major prognostic factors, treatment modification by thrombocytopenia was a positive prognostic factor for overall survival, and this effect was entirely driven by patients with tumors without MGMT promoter methylation only. Conversely, thrombocytopenia was associated with inferior progression-free survival in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumors, suggesting a link to insufficient lomustine exposure.

Conclusion

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is a major limitation to adequate exposure to lomustine salvage chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Its association with survival suggests that mitigating thrombocytopenia to allow enhanced drug exposure in patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors might improve outcome.

PL3.2 Trabectedin for recurrent WHO grade II or III meningioma: a randomized phase II study of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group (EORTC-1320-BTG)

BACKGROUND

EORTC-1320-BTG investigated the activity, safety and quality of life of therapy with the tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid trabectedin (Yondelis®) in patients with recurrent higher-grade meningiomas. Trabectedin was originally derived from the Caribbean sea squirt, Ecteinascidia turbinata, and currently is manufactured by total synthesis.

METHODS

Adult patients with histological diagnosis of WHO grade II or III meningioma and radiologically documented progression after maximal feasible surgery and radiotherapy were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2every three weeks) or local standard of care (LOC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Within 22.1 months, we randomized a total of 90 patients (n=29 in LOC arm, n=61 in trabectedin arm) in 35 institutions and nine countries. In the LOC arm, the following treatments were administered: hydroxyurea (n=11), bevacizumab (n=9), none (n=4), chemotherapy (n=3), somatostatin analogue (n=1), combined chemotherapy and somatostatin analogue (n=1). With 71 PFS events, median PFS was 4.17 months in the LOC and 2.43 months in the trabectedin arm (hazard ratio [HR] for progression, 1.42; 80% CI, 1.00–2.03; p=0.204) with a PFS-6 rate of 29.1% (95% CI, 11.9%-48.8%) in the LOC and 21.1% (95% CI, 11.3%-32.9%) in the trabectedin arm. Median OS was 10.61 months in the LOC and 11.37 months in the trabectedin arm (HR for death, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.54–1.76; p=0.94).Grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 44.4% (18.5% related, 4 serious adverse events, 0 lethal events) of the patients in the LOC and 59% (32.8% related, 57 serious adverse events and 2 toxic deaths) of patient in the trabectedin arm.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first prospective randomized trial performed in recurrent grade II or III meningioma, trabectedin did not improve PFS and OS and was associated with significantly higher toxicity as compared to LOC treatment. The data collected in this study may serve as benchmark for future clinical trials in this setting.

P14.124 EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8: A phase III trial of marizomib in combination with standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy versus standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes maximal debulking surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT), and concomitant as well as maintenance therapy with the alkylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ). However, the prognosis remains poor and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Targeting the proteasome has been considered a promising anti-cancer approach for several years. Marizomib is a novel, irreversible and pan-proteasome inhibitor, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and has been assessed in phase I trials in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 is a randomized, controlled, open label phase III superiority trial. Patients with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a performance status >70 are eligible. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard of care (TMZ/RT→TMZ) alone or TMZ/RT→TMZ plus marizomib. The study aims at enrolling 750 patients. Stratification factors include study site, age, performance status and extent of resection. The primary objective of this trial is to compare overall survival in patients receiving marizomib in addition to standard of care with those receiving standard treatment only. The testing strategy specifies the determination of this objective in the intent-to-treat population as well as the subgroup of patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, neurocognitive function and quality of life. A translational research program has been set up. The study will be activated at approximately 50 EORTC sites across Europe, 25 sites in Canada and additional sites in the US. Patient recruitment started in June 2018 and as of April 29, 2019, a total of 164 patients have been randomized. An update on the enrolment status will be provided at the EANO meeting. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345095

OS8.6 Sensitivity of human meningioma cells to the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, TG02

BACKGROUND

Standards of care for meningioma include surgical resection, which may be curative, and radiotherapy as required. Pharmacotherapy plays only a minor role in this disease; however, novel systemic approaches are urgently needed for patients who are no longer candidates for local therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We generated primary cultures from surgically removed meningiomas to explore the activity of a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, TG02, in meningioma cell cultures. Tumor and cell cultures were characterized by mutation profiling and DNA methylation profiling. DNA methylation data were used to allot each sample to one out of six previously established meningioma methylation classes: benign (ben)-1, 2, 3, intermediate (int)-A, B, and malignant (mal). The activity of TG02 was assessed by standard cell culture assays.

RESULTS

Cell cultures were derived from nine meningiomas. Four tumors assigned to the methylation class ben-2 showed the same class in the cell culture whereas cell cultures from five non-ben-2 tumors showed a different class, a more malignant class in four of five patients. Cell cultures were uniformly sensitive to the growth inhibitory effects of TG02 in the nanomolar range. Assignment of the cell cultures to a more malignant methylation classifier appeared to be more closely associated with TG02 sensitivity than assignment to a higher WHO grade of the primary tumors.

CONCLUSION

Primary cell cultures from meningioma facilitate the investigation of the anti-meningioma activity of novel agents. TG02, an orally available cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, warrants further exploration in this disease.

OS4.1 MEVITEM: A European, randomized, open-label, Phase I/II study of vismodegib in combination with temozolomide versus temozolomide alone in adult patients with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma presenting an activation of the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway

BACKGROUND

Vismodegib (V) suppresses sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling. We postulated that vismodegib together with chemotherapy may be more efficient than chemotherapy alone in patients (pts) relapsing of a SHH-activated medulloblastoma (MB).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adult pts with recurrent SHH-MB not previously exposed to temozolomide (T) were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to Arm A (V daily 150mg/d, po) + T (D1-5: 150 mg/m2 for cycle 1 and 200 mg/m2 thereafter; n=up to 25pts) or Am B (T alone; n=up to 13pts). Identification of SHH activation was performed centrally by IHC (GAB1, β-catenin, filamin A, and YAP1). NGS analyses were performed to identify the mutations responsible for SHH activation. Primary objectives were to assess the incidence of severe toxicities (safety run-in based on a 3 + 3 design) and the 6-month non-progression rate (NPR-6m) according to WHO criteria and based on central read tumor assessment (Phase II). A Minimax Simon’s two-stage design was used to detect NPR-6m of 55% (p0: 30%, type I error rate of 5%, power of 80%). At first stage, ≥ 3/9 pts without progression at 6m were required for the accrual of 16 additional pts in Arm A. A 3rd independent and parallel arm with V as single agent (Arm C, n= up to15pts) was added for pts previously treated by T.

RESULTS

24 SHH-MB pts were enrolled (Arm A: 10, Arm B: 5 and Arm C: 9; median age: 37 y [21–55]). At the end of the safety run-in; no major safety concerns were reported. At the end of Stage I: no objective response were reported and 2 pts among 10 were free of progression at 6m among in Arm A. According to statistical rules, the study was definitively closed to enrolment. NGS analyses showed a PTCH1 inactivating mutation in 6 pts (n=4 in arm A; n= 2 in arm B); a SMO activating mutation in 4 pts (n= 3 in Arm A; n=1 in Arm B). For 1 pt in each arm, no tumor sample was available for analysis, for 1 pt in Arm A DNA quality was insufficient, and for 1 patient in each arm no mutations of SMO, PTCH1, SUFU or SHH were found. Out of the 4 pts in Arm A with an inactivating PTCH1 mutation, only 1 was progression free at 6m. PFS and OS data will be presented at the meeting.

CONCLUSION

The combination of vismodegib with monthly T failed to demonstrate superior activity as compared with T alone. Further studies are warranted to refine therapeutic indication for vismodegib

P14.25 Venous thromboembolic events in patients with brain metastases: the PICOS score

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolic events are significant complications in patients and possibly associated with an unfavorable outcome. Thrombosis risk is poorly defined for patients with brain metastasis, and available risk calculation scores are not validated for these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified 811 patients with brain metastasis followed at our institution and screened electronic charts retrospectively for the occurrence of venous thromboembolic events, along with candidate risk factors. Risk factors were tested in uni- and multivariate analyses and finally integrated in a score model for risk prediction.

RESULTS

Venous thromboembolic events were documented in 97 of 811 patients (12.0%). Primary tumors with high thrombogenicity (p=0.02, odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.8), dexamethasone (p=0.011, odds ratio 2.27, 95% CI 1.5–4.5), chemotherapy (p=0.005, odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.6–7.5), BMI > 35 kg/m2 (p=0.002, odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.6–7.5) and immobilization (p=0.003, odds ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.3) were confirmed as independent predictors of VTE. We derived a score model for venous thromboembolic event prediction, the PICOS (thrombogenic Primary, Immobilization, Chemotherapy, Obesity, Steroids) score (0–7 points). Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis demonstrated its prognostic accuracy (AUC=0.71, 95% CI 0.64–0.77), and its predictive capability was superior to that of other scores proposed for the evaluation of venous thromboembolic event risk such as the Khorana (AUC=0.51) or CONKO (AUC=0.52) scores.

CONCLUSION

We report a rate of venous thrombotic events of 12.0% in our cohort of 811 patients with brain metastasis. We define a risk model for prediction in of venous thrombotic events in patients with BM, the PICOS score. It may become a valuable tool for the identification of brain metastasis patients at high risk for venous thromboembolic events and be helpful for guidance of clinicians towards decision whether to start thrombosis prophylaxis. Further, the PICOS score might be used for stratification in controlled studies.

Cerebrospinal fluid cell-free tumour DNA as a liquid biopsy for primary brain tumours and central nervous system metastases

Challenges in obtaining tissue specimens from patients with brain tumours limit the diagnosis and molecular characterisation and impair the development of better therapeutic approaches. The analysis of cell-free tumour DNA in plasma (considered a liquid biopsy) has facilitated the characterisation of extra-cranial tumours. However, cell-free tumour DNA in plasma is limited in quantity and may not reliably capture the landscape of genomic alterations of brain tumours. Here, we review recent work assessing the relevance of cell-free tumour DNA from cerebrospinal fluid in the characterisation of brain cancer. We focus on the advances in the use of the cerebrospinal fluid as a source of cell-free tumour DNA to facilitate diagnosis, reveal actionable genomic alterations, monitor responses to therapy, and capture tumour heterogeneity in patients with primary brain tumours and brain and leptomeningeal metastases. Profiling cerebrospinal fluid cell-free tumour DNA provides the opportunity to precisely acquire and monitor genomic information in real time and guide precision therapies.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers, steroids and radiotherapy in glioblastoma-a randomised multicentre trial (ASTER trial). An ANOCEF study

BACKGROUND

Glioblastomas (GBMs) induce a peritumoural vasogenic oedema impairing functional status and quality of life. Steroids reduce brain tumour-related oedema but are associated with numerous side-effects. It was reported in a retrospective series that angiotensin receptor blockers might be associated with reduced peritumoural oedema. The ASTER study is a randomised, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether or not the addition of Losartan to standard of care (SOC) can reduce steroid requirement during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a histologically confirmed GBM after biopsy or partial surgical resection were randomised between Losartan or placebo in addition to SOC with RT and temozolomide (TMZ). The primary objective was to investigate the steroid dosage required to control brain oedema on the last day of RT in each arm. The secondary outcomes were steroids dosage 1 month after the end of RT, assessment of cerebral oedema on magnetic resonance imaging, tolerance and survival.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to receive Losartan (37 patients) or placebo (38 patients). No difference in the steroid dosage required to control brain oedema on the last day of RT, or one month after completion of RT, was seen between both arms. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both arms. Median overall survival was similar in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan, although well tolerated, does not reduce the steroid requirement in newly diagnosed GBM patients treated with concomitant RT and TMZ. Trial registration number NCT01805453 with ClinicalTrials.gov.

High-field intraoperative MRI in glioma surgery: A prospective study with volumetric analysis of extent of resection and functional outcome

BACKGROUND

High-field intraoperative MRI (IoMRI) is a useful tool to improve the extent of glioma resection (EOR).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the interest of 1.5T IoMRI in glioma surgery between enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, based on volumetric analysis.

METHODS

A prospective single-center study included consecutive adult patients undergoing glioma surgery with IoMRI. Volumetric evaluation was based on FLAIR hypersignal after gadolinium injection in non-enhancing tumors and T1 hypersignal after gadolinium injection in enhancing tumors. Endpoints comprised: residual tumor volume (RTV), EOR, workflow and clinical outcome on Karnofsky performance score (KPS).

RESULTS

Fifty-three surgeries were performed from July 2014 to January 2016. Thirty-four patients underwent one IoMRI, and 19 two IoMRIs. In non-enhancing tumors, intraoperative RTV on 1st IoMRI T2/FLAIR was higher than in enhancing tumors on T1 sequences (7.25cm³ vs. 0.74cm³, respectively; P=0.008), whereas the RTV on 2nd IoMRIs and final RTV were no longer significantly different. After IoMRI, 72% of patients underwent additional resection. In non-enhancing tumors, EOR increased from 77.3% on 1st IoMRI to 97.4% on last MRI (P<0.001). Taking all tumors together, final RTV values were: median=0cm³, mean=3.9cm³. Mean final EOR was 94%. In 25% of patients, KPS was reduced during early postoperative course; at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, median KPS was 90.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative MRI guidance significantly enhanced the extent of glioma resection, especially for non- or minimally enhancing tumors, while preserving patient autonomy.

Combined irradiation and targeted therapy or immune checkpoint blockade in brain metastases: toxicities and efficacy

Background

Targeted therapies (TT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are currently modifying the landscape of metastatic cancer management and are increasingly used over the course of many cancers treatment. They allow long-term survival with controlled extra-cerebral disease, contributing to the increasing incidence of brain metastases (BMs). Radiation therapy remains the cornerstone of BMs treatment (either whole brain irradiation or stereotactic radiosurgery), and investigating the safety profile of radiation therapy combined with TT or ICI is of high interest. Discontinuing an efficient systemic therapy, when BMs irradiation is considered, might allow systemic disease progression and, on the other hand, the mechanisms of action of these two therapeutic modalities might lead to unexpected toxicities and/or greater efficacy, when combined.

Patients and methods

We carried out a systematic literature review focusing on the safety profile and the efficacy of BMs radiation therapy combined with targeted agents or ICI, emphasizing on the role (if any) of the sequence of combination scheme (drug given before, during, and/or after radiation therapy).

Results

Whereas no relevant toxicity has been noticed with most of these drugs, the concomitant use of some other drugs with brain irradiation requires caution.

Conclusion

Most of available studies appear to advocate for TT or ICI combination with radiation therapy, without altering the clinical safety profiles, allowing the maintenance of systemic treatments when stereotactic radiation therapy is considered. Cognitive functions, health-related quality of life and radiation necrosis risk remain to be assessed. The results of prospective studies are awaited in order to complete and validate the above discussed retrospective data.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A continuing challenge in the personalized treatment era

Leptomeningeal metastasis is a fatal manifestation seen in advanced cancer patients. Its incidence is increasing, reaching 3.8% in molecularly unselected non-small cell lung cancer patients and up to 5% and 9% in ALK-rearranged and EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients, respectively. The prognosis remains poor despite systemic treatment, intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy and personalized treatments in molecularly selected patients. However, new therapies with improved cerebral-spinal fluid penetration have been developed for subgroups of molecular selected patients indicating they could be promising therapeutic options for managing leptomeningeal disease. Systemic chemotherapy, which may be combined with intrathecal chemotherapy, remains standard treatment for lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal disease and a good-risk profile. We summarize evidence reported in the literature for managing this complication in lung cancer patients. Based on this, we have selected potential therapeutic strategies that could be used in daily clinical practice.

Systemic therapy for recurrent meningioma

INTRODUCTION

Meningioma comprise 20-30% of all primary brain tumors. Notwithstanding surgery and radiotherapy, a subset of patients will manifest recurrent meningioma. Systemic therapy is recommended only when further surgery and radiotherapy are not possible. No prospective study with a high level of evidence is available to inform as to recommendations regarding systemic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

We aim to summarize systemic therapies for recurrent meningioma. Expert commentary: Hydroxurea, temozolomide, irinotecan, the combination of cyclophosphamide/adriamycine/vincristine, interferon-alpha, somatostatin analogs, mifepristone, megestrol acetate, imatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib are considered as having limited efficacy. Potential activity of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors such as sunitinib, valatinib, and bevacizumab is suggested in small non-controlled studies and requires validation in randomized trials. The identification of new prognostic markers such as TERT promoter mutations and potential new therapeutic targets, such as KLF4, AKT1, TRAF7, and SMO mutations hopefully facilitate this endeavor.