An invariant for timing of saccades during visual search

The variable latency of a saccade to the onset of a single target reveals our brain's hypothesis testing about the target's presence. Search in complex scenes involves multiple objects that compete to become fixated. The initiation of a saccade in this case involves two hypotheses: (1) a potential target is present outside the fovea and (2) the currently fixated object is not the target. Previous models suggest that these hypotheses are evaluated independently, each involving a decision signal that races towards threshold. We show here that the skewed latency distributions during search comply with strong competition between these decision signals rather than independence. Moreover, the thresholds for the two competing processes are not independent either but conform to an invariant that suggests that saccades in complex scenes are made when the odds for the target's presence outside the fovea versus within the fovea are about four.

Different visual search strategies in stationary and moving radial patterns

This study compared visual search strategies in patterns of radially moving dots (simulating self-motion) to those used in matched stationary displays (radial patterns of lines). To control for differences in target visibility, 75% detection thresholds for deviating motion direction and line orientation, respectively, were determined as a function of eccentricity in Experiment 1. These individual thresholds were used to study saccadic parameters in Experiment 2, when subjects searched for targets in the stationary and moving patterns. Despite similarities in search performance, visual search in moving radial patterns was characterised by fewer saccades, longer initial fixation times, and shorter saccadic amplitudes after the initial saccade than during search in a matched stationary radial pattern. These results suggest that detection performance alone cannot explain saccadic search behaviour, and that different search strategies may be used in moving compared to stable environments.

Changes in limb stiffness under conditions of mental stress

In 2 experiments, the effects of mental stress on limb stiffness were investigated. The relative contribution to arm stiffness of individual muscle activity, co-contraction, muscle reflexes, and postural adjustments were examined. In each experiment, participants (N = 24, Experiment 1; N = 16, Experiment 2) held their supinated hand under a tray that they were required to return to horizontal after it had been suddenly released. Electromyographic activity in the biceps and triceps muscles was recorded, as were elbow and wrist angles and tray displacement. In Experiment 1, mental arithmetic stress was shown to lead to decreased tray displacement (i.e., increased resistance) compared with displacements under the control, unstressed condition, as well as to increased elbow flexion before tray release. In Experiment 2, the increased resistance to perturbation caused by mental stress was found to be independent of initial elbow angle, but to vary as a function of the amount of upward force exerted before tray release. The authors conclude that stress-induced increases in limb stiffness result from changes in the initial position of the elbow, specified by its angle, together with the initial force exerted by participants to counteract the mechanical perturbations.

Effects of spatial and symbolic precues on localization performance

One of the fundamental properties of spatial vision is the ability to localize objects in space. According to a recent proposal, accurate localization performance involves the operation of two systems: the attention system and the eye movement system. Upon stimulus presentation, attention is shifted to the target area: this provides coarse location information. Subsequently, a saccadic eye movement is executed: this provides fine location information. In this study we tested predictions derived from this model concerning the effects of precue information on localization performance. In a series of five experiments we manipulated duration of precue (71, 400, and 1,000 ms) and type of precue (spatial versus symbolic). Results showed that very short duration (i.e., 71 ms) spatial precues improved localization performance whereas very short duration symbolic precues did not. In contrast, the 1,000 ms duration precue condition showed similar amounts of precuing benefit for the spatial and symbolic precues. This pattern of differential precuing effects corroborated the two-process model of localization performance.

Effects of age on performance in a finger-precuing task

This study investigated age-related precuing effects in the finger-precuing task (J. Miller, 1982). In this task, a spatial precue provides partial advance information about which fingers to use for responding. Results indicated a substantial age-related deficit in preparing 2 fingers on 2 hands, but not on 1 hand. This disparate set of findings does not provide strong support for A. A. Hartley's (1993) hypothesis that anterior brain attention systems responsible for selection-for-action are compromised with advancing age. Finally, the authors report that advancing age increasingly slows reaction time more to the inner than to the outer stimulus-response positions. A possible mechanism of this age-related bowed stimulus-response position effect is discussed.

Effects of age on performance in a finger-precuing task

This study investigated age-related precuing effects in the finger-precuing task (J. Miller, 1982). In this task, a spatial precue provides partial advance information about which fingers to use for responding. Results indicated a substantial age-related deficit in preparing 2 fingers on 2 hands, but not on 1 hand. This disparate set of findings does not provide strong support for A. A. Hartley's (1993) hypothesis that anterior brain attention systems responsible for selection-for-action are compromised with advancing age. Finally, the authors report that advancing age increasingly slows reaction time more to the inner than to the outer stimulus-response positions. A possible mechanism of this age-related bowed stimulus-response position effect is discussed.

Temporal and spatial adaptations during the acquisition of a reversal movement

Adjustments of the biphasic movement in a coincidence anticipation task were studied using an erroneous knowledge of results (KR) paradigm. Forty participants received either no KR, correct KR, erroneous (+100 ms) KR, or 100 trials of correct KR followed by 50 trials of erroneous KR. Kinematic analyses revealed that for this 100-50 KR group the extension part of the movement was temporally adjusted under the influence of erroneous KR. Although accompanied by a decrease in movement amplitude, this did not account for the temporal shift in movement outcome, because all groups showed a reduction in amplitude. It is argued that changing external time constraints mainly results in temporal adaptations. However, spatial adaptations do play a role in kinematic changes during acquisition.

Spatial localization: tests of a two-process model

The present study examined the recently proposed two-process model of localization performance in which a shift of attention, providing coarse location information, is followed by a saccadic eye movement, providing fine location information. In experiment 1 the nature of the localization response was manipulated. In contrast to the indirect response mode used in the study by Adam et al., i.e., manipulating the "arrow" keys to move the cursor to the target location, experiment 1 required subjects to point to the target location. The high degree of similarity between the pattern of results obtained with the pointing and cursor response indicated that performance in the localization paradigm was not differentially affected by the nature of the required response. In experiment 2 the characteristics of the backward masking stimulus was manipulated by employing three masking conditions: (1) a long-duration mask; (2) a short-duration mask (100 ms); and (3) a no-mask condition. Results showed that the long-duration mask caused interference at short and facilitation at long intervals between onset of target and mask; the short-duration mask caused interference only at short intervals. Overall the findings were consistent with the two-process model of localization performance.