Alemtuzumab treatment of multiple sclerosis in real-world clinical practice: A report from a single Italian center

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab, is a compound approved for highly active MS, and, in Europe, employed after the use of other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) with an escalation approach or used as a first therapeutic option. The occurrence of secondary autoimmune adverse events and or infections can differ depending on the employed approach.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in real-world MS population that encompassed patients previously treated with other DMTs.

METHODS

35 patients, treated with alemtuzumab in a single MS Center, were followed for at least 36 months. The study investigated the prevalence of patients reaching the phase of the non-active disease (NEDA-3). All the adverse events were also reported, and correlations assessed.

RESULTS

At the 36-month follow-up, 66,7% of patients achieved the NEDA-3 status, 90,5% of the patients were relapse-free, 85,7% showed no signs of disability progression, nor signs of MRI activity. Adverse events were observed in 45,7% of the patients and ranked as severe in 23% of them. Cases of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), pancytopenia, viral hepatitis E, and noninfectious meningo-encephalomyelitis were found and reported. For these complications, the post hoc analysis showed possible interactive factors and causality related to previous DMT treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world MS population like the one investigated in our study, alemtuzumab was found to be an effective treatment when employed as an escalation or rescue therapy. The compound exhibits a variable safety profile and frequent adverse events that are likely depending on previous treatments and their impact on the immune system.

Implementation of the ‘Sapere Migliora’ information aid for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis in routine clinical practice: a late-phase controlled trial

Background:

The SIMS-Trial showed that the ‘Sapere Migliora’ information aid (IA) for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) effectively improved patient knowledge and satisfaction with care.

Objectives:

The objectives of this paper are to assess the effectiveness of the IA in clinical practice and to compare the whole IA with the take-home booklet/website component alone.

Methods:

After updating the IA and replacing the CD with a website, a prospective, open-label non-randomised controlled trial compared the whole IA (group A, five SIMS-Trial centres) to take-home (group B, 16 centres). One month after the intervention, participants completed the MS Knowledge Questionnaire (MSKQ), care satisfaction questionnaire (COSM-R) (primary study outcomes), Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale, and ad hoc questionnaire appraising the IA.

Results:

We enrolled 159 newly diagnosed PwMS (May 2012–March 2013). Drop-outs were four of 77 (5%, group A) and 11/82 (13%, group B). Primary endpoint (highest tertile both for MSKQ and COSM-R section 2 scores) was achieved by 38/77 (49%) group A and 33/82 (40%) group B ( p = 0.25). Attainment of secondary outcomes was also similar between groups.

Conclusions:

This study shows that the entire IA is not superior to the booklet/website alone, and that both are comparable in efficacy to the intervention arm of the SIMS-Trial.

Trial registration number:

ISRCTN78940214.

Effect of the disclosure of MS diagnosis on anxiety, mood and quality of life of patients: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

In the light of the new diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) and currently available early treatment, this study aimed to explore whether, and to what extent, disclosure of the diagnosis of MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) affects patients' anxiety, mood and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Eligible participants were all patients referred for the first time to the Neurological Unit who had manifested symptoms suggestive of MS for no more than 6 months. All patients were evaluated for (i) QoL (SEIQoL and MS-QoL54), (ii) Anxiety (STAI) and Depression (CMDI) on study inclusion (T0), 30 days after diagnosis disclosure (T30), and after 1 (T1y) and 2 (T2y) years' follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled; 93 of these were unaware of their diagnosis. Patients who already knew their diagnosis (100 with CIS and 22 with MS) were excluded from the main analyses and used to perform control analyses. At the end of the screening, an MS diagnosis was disclosed to 18 of the 93 patients, whereas a CIS diagnosis was disclosed to 62 patients (12 patients received a diagnosis other than MS or CIS). Thirty days after diagnosis disclosure, irrespective of the diagnosis disclosed, both QoL and Anxiety and Depression were significantly rated as better compared to the start of screening, (p(s) < 0.03), and this improvement remained stable over the two annual follow-ups. However, as suggested by a significant 'Time' × 'Diagnosis' interaction with regard to both QoL and Anxiety and Depression (p(s) < 0.02), the effect of the disclosure in the short term differed depending on CIS or MS diagnosis. Specifically, on MSQoL, which is a health-related QoL scale, we found a statically significant improvement, immediately after the diagnosis disclosure, in both the MS and CIS groups (p(s) < 0.01). Differently, on SEIQoL, which is a non health-related QoL measure, and on the anxiety scale, we observed a statistically significant improvement only in the group which received a MS diagnosis (p(s) < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This first prospective study provides objective data showing that early disclosure of MS diagnosis improves both the patient's QoL and psychological well-being. In addition, the results seem to suggest that CIS disclosure does not lead to the same favourable effects.