The relationship between anatomy and electrical parameters in His bundle pacing

Background

The relationship between anatomy and electrical parameters of His bundle (HB) pacing has not been extensively studied.

Purpose

To characterize the anatomical location of the HB lead tip and its relationship with acute electrical parameters.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent HB lead implantation, guided by standard fluoroscopy and electrophysiology, were prospectively enrolled. The relationship between HB lead tip and tricuspid valve plane (TVP) was assessed with post-procedure transthoracic echocardiography.

Results

Twenty-five patients were studied. In 11 patients (44%), the HB lead tip did not cross the TVP (A group): in 7 cases it was screwed in the right atrium at a mean distance of −6.1 mm from the TVP and, in 4 cases, at the level of the tricuspid annulus. In the remaining 14 patients (56%), the lead tip crossed the TVP (V group): it was screwed in the right ventricle at a mean distance of 9.3 mm from the TVP. A and V groups had comparable HB capture thresholds (1.6±1 V vs 1.7±0.7 V, 1 ms pulse-width; p=0.66); selective HB capture was significantly more represented in the A group (91% vs 21%; p=0.001). Significantly higher R-wave amplitudes were seen in the V group (6.7±3 vs 2.5±1.7 mV; p=0.0004), and they positively correlated with the distance from the TVP (p=0.0038). Atrial oversensing was never observed.

Conclusion

In a consecutive cohort of HBP recipients, the rate of patients who had an effective HB capture in the atrium was substantial and was characterized by different electrophysiological properties than in the ventricle.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The logic and regulation of cell cycle exit and reentry

Tissue repair and regeneration are very complex biological events, whose successful attainment requires far more than mere cell division. However, almost unavoidably they entail cell proliferation as a fundamental premise. Full regeneration or repair cannot be achieved without replacing cells lost to disease or injury, replacement that can only take place via proliferation of surviving cells. This review endeavors to outline the molecular bases of exit from and reentry into the cell cycle. In recent years, the decision to proliferate or not has been seen as mostly the concern of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. This account tries to show that cell cycle inhibitors are as important as the positive regulators in the making of this decision. Finally, the authors wish to suggest that the molecular knowledge of the cell cycle can be harnessed to the benefit of many aspects of regenerative medicine.

Comparative assessment of right, left, and biventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Left ventricular (LV) and biventricular (BiV) pacing are potentially superior to right ventricular (RV) apical pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation and pacing for permanent atrial fibrillation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective randomized, single-blind, 3-month crossover comparison between RV and LV pacing (phase 1) and between RV and BiV pacing (phase 2) performed in 56 patients (70+/-8 years, 34 males) affected by severely symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation, uncontrolled ventricular rate, or heart failure. Primary endpoints were quality of life and exercise capacity. Compared with RV pacing, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ) score improved by 2 and 10% with LV and BiV pacing, respectively, the effort dyspnoea item of the Specific Symptom Scale (SSS) changed by 0 and 2%, the Karolinska score by 6 and 14% (P<0.05 for BiV), the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class by 5 and 11% (P<0.05 for BiV), the 6-min walked distance by 12 (+4%) and 4 m (+1%), and the ejection fraction by 5 and 5% (P<0.05 for both). BiV pacing but not LV pacing was slightly better than RV pacing in the subgroup of patients with preserved systolic function and absence of native left bundle branch block. Compared with pre-ablation measures, the Minnesota LHFQ score improved by 37, 39, and 49% during RV, LV, and BiV pacing, respectively, the effort dyspnoea item of the SSS by 25, 25, and 39%, the Karolinska score by 39, 42, and 54%, the NYHA class by 21, 25, and 30%, the 6-min walking distance by 35 (12%), 47 (16%), and 51 m (19%) and the ejection fraction by 5, 10, and 10% (all differences P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Rhythm regularization achieved with AV-junction ablation improved quality of life and exercise capacity with all modes of pacing. LV and BiV pacing provided modest or no additional favourable effect compared with RV pacing.

Management of syncope referred urgently to general hospitals with and without syncope units

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that management of patients with syncope admitted urgently to a general hospital may be influenced by the presence of an in-hospital structured syncope unit.

BACKGROUND

The management of syncope is not standardized. Methods We compared six hospitals equipped with a syncope unit organized inside the department of cardiology with six matched hospitals without such facilities. The study enroled all consecutive patients referred to the emergency room from 5 November 2001 to 7 December 2001 who were affected by transient loss of consciousness as their principal symptom.

RESULTS

There were 279 patients in the syncope unit hospitals and 274 in the control hospitals. In the study group, 30 (11%) patients were referred to the syncope unit for evaluation. In the study group, 12% fewer patients were hospitalized (43 vs 49%, not significant) and 8% fewer tests were performed (3.3+/-2.2 vs 3.6+/-2.2 per patient, not significant). In particular, the study group patients underwent fewer basic laboratory tests (75 vs 86%, P=0.002), fewer brain-imaging examinations (17 vs 24%, P=0.05), fewer echocardiograms (11 vs 16%, P=0.04), more carotid sinus massage (13 vs 8%, P=0.03) and more tilt testing (8 vs 1%, P=0.000). In the study group, there was a +56% rate of final diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope (56 vs 36%, P=0.000).

CONCLUSION

Although only a minority of patients admitted as an emergency are referred to the syncope unit, overall management is substantially affected. It is speculated that the use of a standardized approach, such as that typically adopted in the syncope unit, is able to influence overall practice in the hospital.

[Variables of arrhythmia risk in relation to pacemaker and implantable defibrillator]

Patients suffering from heart failure are at high risk of arrhythmic death. Conventional pacemakers have not shown to affect mortality in patients with chronic heart failure and sick sinus syndrome, while this issue is established in patients with III degree or advanced atrioventricular block. Biventricular pacing has recently been introduced in clinical practice and the experience is limited; to date, only an improvement in symptoms and quality of life has been shown. Biventricular pacing with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator back-up is promising. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is able to reduce total and sudden mortality in high risk patients, as clearly demonstrated by several randomized clinical trials.