Impact of "critical lesions" on outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and complete cytoreduction are the best outcome predictors following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Lesions in critical areas, regardless of PCI, complicate surgery and impact oncological outcomes. We prospectively defined "Critical lesions" (CL) as penetrating the hepatic hilum, diaphragm at hepatic outflow, major blood vessels, pancreas, or urinary tract.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 352 CRS + HIPEC patients from 2015 to 2019. Excluded patients with aborted/redo operation (n = 112), or incomplete data (n = 19). Patients categorized by CL status and compared: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), PCI, transfusions, hospital stay, post-operative complications and mortality, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Included 221 patients (78 CL; 143 no-CL). No difference in patients' characteristics: age, BMI, gender or co-morbidities noted. Operative time longer (5.3 h vs 4.3 h, p < 0.01), EBL higher (769 ml vs 405 ml, p < 0.01), transfusions higher (1.9 vs 0.7 Units, p < 0.001) and PCI higher (15.5 vs 9.5, p < 0.01) in CL. No difference in major complications. Postoperative complications, CL, OR-time and transfusions were predictive of OS in univariate analysis, while only complications remained on multivariate analysis. Median follow up of 21.4 months, 3-year DFS/OS was 22% vs 30% (p < 0.037) and 73% vs 87% (p < 0.014) in CL and non-CL, respectively. Despite CL complete resection, 17/38 patients (44.7%) that recurred had recurrence at previous CL site.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical lesions complicate surgery and may be associated with poor oncological outcomes with high local recurrence rate, despite no significant difference in complications. Utilizing adjuvant or intra-operative radiation may be beneficial.

FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab administered weekly or every second week in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II CECOG study

BACKGROUND

This randomized phase II study investigated first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab administered every second week in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received FOLFOX4 plus either standard weekly cetuximab (arm 1) or cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) every second week (arm 2), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety were also investigated. The study was not powered to establish non-inferiority, but aimed at the estimation of treatment differences.

RESULTS

Of 152 randomized eligible patients, 75 were treated in arm 1 and 77 in arm 2; ORRs [53% versus 62%, odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-2.66], PFS [median 9.5 versus 9.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.63-1.34], OS (median 25.8 versus 23.0 months, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56-1.30) and DCR (87%) were comparable. HRs adjusted for baseline factors were 1.01 and 0.99 for PFS and OS, respectively. Frequencies of grade 3/4 adverse events in arms 1 versus 2 were similar: most common were neutropenia (28% versus 34%) and rash (15% versus 17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Activity and safety of FOLFOX4 plus either cetuximab administered weekly or every second week were similar.

A randomized phase III study comparing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with FOLFIRI in patients following complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies indicate that adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (FA) in colorectal cancer patients with completely resectable liver-limited metastases (LMCRC) offers clinical benefit over surgery alone. This phase III trial compared FOLFIRI with simplified 5-FU/FA in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

LMCRC patients were randomized to receive every 14 days, FA, 400 mg/m2 infused over 2 h, followed by 5-FU as a 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, followed by continuous 5-FU infusion, 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h (LV5FUs) with or without irinotecan: 180 mg/m2 infusion (FOLFIRI). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Treated patients (n = 306) were balanced for critical prognostic factors in each arm. Median DFS in patients receiving LV5FUs was 21.6 versus 24.7 months for FOLFIRI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, log-rank P = 0.44]. No significant differences were found in OS. A trend was observed for improved DFS in patients receiving FOLFIRI within 42 days of surgery (HR 0.75, P = 0.17). Grade 3/4 toxic effects were more common in patients treated with FOLFIRI versus LV5FUs (47% versus 30%) with neutropenia being most common (23% versus 7%).

CONCLUSION

FOLFIRI in the adjuvant treatment of LMCRC showed no significant improvement in DFS compared with LV5FUs.

Effect of the I1307K polymorphism in APC confers a higher risk for polyp recurrence in Jewish Ashkenazi carriers

e22003

Background: The I1307K adenomatous polyposis coli gene variant, prevalent among Ashkenazi Jews, may increase risk for colorectal neoplasia [colorectal cancer (CRC) and CR adenoma]. We studied the clinical importance of this polymorphism in 3283 Israelis undergoing colonoscopic assessment. Methods: Blood samples and risk factor information were collected from individuals undergoing colonoscopic examination at our medical center. Germline genetic analysis for the APC I1307K variant was performed using real-time PCR for DNA extracted from peripheral mononuclear cells. Results: The overall prevalence of the I1307K polymorphism was 8.1% (10.2% among Ashkenazi while only 2.5% among Sephardic Jews, p=0.001). The overall adjusted odds ratio (OR) for CR neoplasia among carriers was 1.3 (1.0 -1.7, p=0.049). Among Ashkenazi Jews, the I1307K variant was significantly more prevalent among persons with a personal or family history (1st degree) of CR neoplasia (p=0.01) as compared to Ashkenazi Jews with no family history. The histopathological features of adenomas and cancers did not differ between carriers and non-carriers. No interactions were found between the I1307K variant and demographic, lifestyle, or dietary modifiers that independently modulated the risk for CR neoplasia. Conclusions: In the general population, the APC I1307K variant does not change the risk or prognosis of colorectal neoplasia in carriers and does not necessarily change their clinical practice. Nevertheless, the variant, which is more prevalent among high risk individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish origin, is an important risk factor for the assessment of recurrence of neoplasia as it confers a higher risk for polyp recurrence in this population.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.