Dutch Nationwide Implementation Program for familial hypercholesterolemia case finding in children: a cost-effectiveness and return on investment analysis

Background

The Netherlands is one of the few countries in the world that actively screen for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

Objectives

We investigated the return on investment (ROI) and cost-effectiveness of the Dutch nationwide implementation program for FH case-finding and preventive treatment in children compared to later detection and treatment from both a societal and healthcare perspective in the Netherlands.

Methods

Cascade case finding and early preventive treatment were modelled to simulate the progression of disease and costs of ten-year-olds suspected of having heterozygous FH (HeFH) over a lifetime. The model consisted of three health states: alive without coronary heart disease (CHD), alive with CHD, and dead. The decision was to compare the nationwide implementation program for FH cascade case-finding in children and immediate treatment with statins compared to “usual care” later detection and treatment. The prevalence of HeFH in this target population was 51.2% as per the Dutch Health Program for FH case-finding, and the sensitivity and specificity of testing was 100%. Contemporary Mendelian Randomisation Analysis data was used to quantify the risk of a first coronary heart disease event as a function of age and total lifetime exposure to low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol. Costs and outcome were sourced from the Dutch data and other published sources. ROI for the Dutch nationwide implementation program for FH case-finding and cost-effectiveness analyses using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) (cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained), compared with current usual care were the main outcomes of interest. All future benefits and costs were discounted annually by 1.5% and 4% respectively.

Results

Over the lifetime horizon, the ROI for the Dutch nationwide implementation program for FH case-finding was €16.52 (i.e. every euro spent on the program resulted in a return of €16.52). From the societal perspective, the Dutch nationwide implementation program for FH case-finding and early treatment with statins was the dominant strategy (health improvement and cost saving) compared to usual care. From a healthcare perspective, the Dutch nationwide implementation program for FH case-finding and early treatment with statins would gain 2.64 QALYs per person, at an additional cost of €7,178 (both discounted). These equated to an ICER of €2,668 per QALY gained.

Conclusions

From the societal perspective, the the Dutch nationwide implementation program for FH case-finding represented excellent value for investment for Netherlands, being not only health saving but also cost saving form a societal perspective and cost effective from a healthcare perspective.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Health economic evaluation of screening and treating children with familial hypercholesterolemia early in life: many happy returns on investment?

Background

There are no studies that have specifically investigated the cost-effectiveness of cascade screening of children for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and treatment of affected individuals with statins to prevent coronary heart disease (CHD).

Purpose

This study explores the cost-effectiveness of this strategy from the perspective of the Australian public healthcare system.

Methods

A lifetime Markov model with four health states (Alive without CHD, Alive with CHD, Dead from fatal CHD, and Dead from other causes) was developed to simulate the progression of ten- year-old children screened for FH and treated immediately with statins if found to have FH. The underlying prevalence of FH in this target population was assumed to be 56.8%, and the sensitivity and specificity of testing was 100%. The comparator was usual care, which assumed that subjects started statins spontaneously at a later point or when they experienced a cardiovascular event. The effect of reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on the risk of a first event at each age assumed that risk was proportional to total lifetime exposure and was implemented using Mendelian randomisation analysis data. Cost and other outcome data were sourced from published sources. Outcome of interests were costs in Australian dollars (AUD), life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of costs per LYG and per QALY gained. All future costs and outcomes were discounted by 5% annually.

Results

Undiscounted results showed that compared with usual care, cascade screening of ten year-old children for FH and initiation of treatment of affected individuals saved 7.77 LYG and 7.53 QALYs per person over a lifetime. With 5% annual discounting, there were 0.97 LYG and 1.07 QALYs gained per person, at an additional cost of $3,244. These equated to ICERs of $3334 per LYG and $3023 per QALY gained. The equivalent ICERs in USD would be $5089 per LYG gained and $4615 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis showed the results to be robust.

Conclusions

Compared to usual care, cascade screening of ten year old children for FH and treating affected individuals is likely to be highly cost-effective.

Table 1. Granular cost and benefit data

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine gene expression in subcutaneous and visceral fat in severe obesity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pro-inflammatory molecules produced by adipose tissue have been implicated in the risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease in obesity. We investigated the expression profile of 19 pro-inflammatory and seven anti-inflammatory genes in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in 44 severely obese individuals who underwent bariatric surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SAT and VAT expressed an identical series of pro-inflammatory genes. Among these genes, 12 were significantly more expressed in SAT than in VAT while just one (IL18) was more expressed in VAT. The remaining genes were equally expressed. Among pro-inflammatory cytokines, both IL6 and IL8 were about 20 times more intensively expressed in SAT than in VAT. The expression of nine genes was highly associated in SAT and VAT. Only for three pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL8, IL18, SAA1) in SAT the gene expression in adipose tissue associated with the circulating levels of the corresponding gene products while no such an association was found as for VAT.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of critical pro-inflammatory genes is substantially higher in SAT than in VAT in individuals with morbid obesity. The variability in circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines is, in small part and just for three pro-inflammatory cytokines, explained by underlying gene expression in SAT but not in VAT. These results point to a compartment-specific adipose tissue contribution to inflammation in obesity and indicate that abdominal SAT contributes more than VAT to the pro-inflammatory milieu associated with severe obesity.