A Novel Strategy to Enhance Radiotherapy Efficacy: Results from the Prospective Phase I Clinical Trial of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles (MRgFUS+MB) Treatment for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that tumor cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy (RT) is combined with focused-ultrasound (FUS)-stimulated microbubbles (MB) treatment. MBs are gas microspheres used as intravascular contrast agents. The acoustic exposure of MBs within the target volume causes bubbles cavitation that induces perturbation of tumor vasculature. This activates apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy, which would otherwise require high-dose radiotherapy (>8-10 Gy/fraction) to be activated. Subsequent irradiation of an MB-sensitized tumor causes increased anoxic tumor killing, which occurs in addition to canonical RT-induced DNA damage. Given the compelling results of preclinical data, we conducted a phase I clinical trial of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-stimulated MBs (MRgFUS+MB) treatment for breast cancer patients (pts). We report the safety and efficacy results of this new radio enhancement treatment.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This is a single-center, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase 1 clinical trial (NCT04431674). We included pts with stage I-IV breast cancer with tumor in situ for whom breast or chest wall RT was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team. Pts were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or MB administration. Pts underwent 2-3 MRgFUS+MB treatments throughout the RT course. We used an MR-coupled FUS-device operating at 500 KHz and 540 kPa peak negative pressure to deliver the treatment. The FUS sonicated intravenously administrated MB within the MR-guided target volume. Pts were monitored for 30-min post-procedure and subsequently treated with RT. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology for Adverse Events V5.0. Secondary outcomes were radiological response at 3 months and local control (LC) at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control. All pts signed a written consent form before study participation.

RESULTS

We enrolled 18 females with 20 primary breast cancer treated with MRgFUS+MB therapy. The median age was 60 years (range, 44-90). The molecular subtypes consisted of basal-like (n = 3/20), luminal (n = 11/20), and HER2-enriched (n = 6/20). The prescribed dose was 20 Gy/5 fractions (n = 8/20), 30-35 Gy/5 fractions (n = 7/20), 30-40 Gy/10 fractions (n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3-29). All pts completed the planned MRgFUS+MB treatments. The only MRgFUS+MB treatment-related toxicity consisted of Grade 1 allergic reaction (mild cough) 30 minutes after the last MB injection. All worst acute toxicities were radiation dermatitis (Grade 3 = 2/20, Grade 2 = 2/20, Grade 1 = 14/20). At 3 months, 75% had partial (n = 6/20) or complete (n = 9/20) response, with a single progression. The LC rate at 1 year was 86%.

CONCLUSION

MRgFUS+MB was a safe and efficient treatment that provided durable responses.

POS0372 USE OF TELEMEDICINE FOR FOLLOW-UP OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS IN THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: ONE-YEAR, PRAGMATIC RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to the underlying disease, comorbidities and use of immunosuppressants (IS). An alternative option would be to adopt telemedicine (TM) to maintain medical care while minimizing exposure. Despite being widely adopted during the pandemic, the evidence supporting the use of TM in rheumatology has been limited.

Objectives

We primarily aimed to evaluate the effectiveness to maintain disease activity control using TM delivered care compared to conventional in-person follow-up in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). The secondary objectives were to compare the patient reported outcomes, safety and cost-of-illness from the patient’s perspective between the 2 modes of health care delivery.

Methods

This was a 1-year, single-center, RCT conducted at a regional hospital in Hong Kong. From May 2020, consecutive adult patients with a SLE according to the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria followed up at the LN clinic were invited to participate in the study. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either TM (TM group) or standard FU (SF group). Patients randomized to receive TM FU were scheduled for a video consultation via a commerical software ZOOM. Patients in the SF group received standard in-person outpatient care. SLE disease activity at each consultation was assessed by SLEDAI-2k and physician global assessment (PGA).

Results

A total of 144 patients with LN were randomized and 3 patients self-withdrew from the study. The mean age was 44.5±11.4 years and the median time from diagnosis to randomization was 168 months (range: 1-528). Most of the patients had class III, IV or V LN (87.2%) and were on prednisolone (89.4%, median dose 5mg daily). Many of them (68.1%) were on IS. While 66.0% of the patients were in lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), none had disease remission. There were no baseline differences, including demographics, SLEDAI-2k (TM: 3.8±2.3, SF: 3.2±2.2, p=0.13, PGA (TM: 6.2±6.5, SF: 4.6±5.9, p=0.13) and SLE damage index (TM: 1.1±1.3, SF: 0.8±1.1, p=0.10), between the 2 groups.

At one year, 80.0% and 80.2% of the patients in the TM group and SF group were in LLDAS or remission respectively. SLE disease activity indices including SLEDAI-2k, PGA, proteinuria amount and serum anti-ds-DNA level remained similar between the 2 groups. Within the study period, 28 (40%) patients in the TM group and 21 (29.6%) patients in the SF group had disease flare (p=0.20). There were no differences in the SF-36, lupusQoL and HADS scores between the 2 groups at the end of the study. The overall patient satisfaction score was higher in the TM group with a significantly shorter waiting time before seeing doctors. At the end of the study, 67.9% of the overall participants agreed to (versus 15.0% who did not agree to) use TM as a mode of future FU.

The mean indirect costs of illness (HKD26,681 vs HKD12,016, p=0.20) and the out-of-pocket costs for health care services were similar between the 2 groups (TM: HKD13,547 vs SF: HKD12,297, p=0.83) in one year. The total number of FU was similar (TM: 6.0±2.0, SF: 5.7±1.7, p=0.40). However, significantly more patients in the TM group (29/70, 41.4% vs 4/71, 5.6%; p<0.01) requested change mode of FU. The proportion of patients requiring hospitalization during the study period was also higher in the TM group (TM: 23/70, 32.9% vs 11/71, 15.5%; p=0.02). After adjusting for age and prednisolone dosage, not being in LLDAS at baseline was the predictor of hospitalization (OR 3.4, 95%CI 1.20-9.65). None of the participants was tested positive for COVID-19.

Conclusion

TM FU resulted in similar 1-year disease activity control and better satisfaction in patients with LN compared to standard care. However, a significant proportion of patients cared by TM required in-person visits or were hospitalized. The results of the study suggest that TM delivered care could help minimizing exposure to COVID-19, but it needs to be complemented by physical visits, particularly in those with unstable disease.

Acknowledgements

We would also like to thank the University of Central Lancashire & East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust for granting us permission to use the LupusQoL questionnaire.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1164 USE OF TELEMEDICINE FOR FOLLOW-UP OF SLE PATIENTS WITH NEPHRITIS IN THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK (“TeleSLE”): THE 6-MONTH RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background:

Patients with lupus nephritis (LN) might be more susceptible to COVID-19 due to the underlying disease, co-morbidities and use of immunosuppressants. We hypothesized that telemedicine (TM) could be a well-accepted mode of health-care delivery minimizing the risk of exposure to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), while maintaining disease control in these patients.

Objectives:

To evaluate the short-term patient satisfaction, compliance, disease control and infection risk of TM compared with standard in-person follow-up (FU) for patients with LN during COVID-19.

Methods:

This was a single-center randomized-controlled study. Consecutive patients followed at the LN clinic were randomized to either TM (TM group) or standard FU (SF group) in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the TM group received scheduled follow-ups via videoconferencing. SF group patients continued conventional in-person outpatient care. The 6-month data were compared.

Results:

From June to December 2020, 122 patients were randomized (TM: 60, SF: 62) and had attended at least 2 FU visits. There were no baseline differences, including SLEDAI-2k and proportion of patients in lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), between the 2 groups except a higher physician global assessment score (PGA) in the TM group (mean 0.67±0.69 vs 0.45±0.60, p=0.003) (Table 1). The mean FU duration was 19.8±4.5 weeks. When comparing the most recent visit, the mean waiting time between entering the clinic waiting room (virtual or real) and seeing a rheumatologist (virtual or in-person) was significantly shorter in the TM group (22.5±28.6 vs 68.9±40.7 minutes, p< 0.001) (Figure 1A). The mean overall patient satisfaction score was higher in the TM group (mean 2.19±0.61 vs 1.89±0.78, p=0.042). The results of the post-consultation satisfaction questionnaire are shown in Figure 1B. The number of visits was similar in the two groups (TM: 3.1±1.3 vs SF: 3.0±1.2, p=0.981). However, there was a trend suggesting that alternative mode of FU was requested more frequently in the TM group than the SF group (TM: 12/60, 20.0% and SF: 5/62, 8.1%; p=0.057). More patients in the TM group had hospitalization (15/60, 25.0% vs 7/62, 11.3%; p=0.049) within the FU period, which was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for the baseline PGA. The proportions of patients remained in LLDAS were similar in the 2 groups (TM: 75.0% vs SF: 74.2%, p=0.919). None of the patients had COVID-19.

Conclusion:

TM resulted in better patient satisfaction and could achieve similar disease control in patients with LN in the short-term when compared to standard care.

Table 1.

Baseline clinical data of the recruited patients and comparison between the telemedicine/standard follow-up groups

Overall (n=122)Telemedicine group (n=60)Standard follow-up group (n=62)P-valueAge in years44.4±11.544.1±11.744.7±11.50.779Gender: Female111 (91.0)55 (91.7)56 (90.3)0.796Disease duration in years15.1±9.016.2±8.714.0±9.10.115Nephritis class III, IV or V108 (88.5)54 (90.0)54 (87.1)0.42724 hour urine proteinuria in gram0.51±0.630.53±0.600.50±0.650.712Current use of prednisolone112 (91.8)57 (95.0)55 (88.7)0.323Daily prednisolone dose in mg5.51±4.215.69±4.175.34±4.290.570Use of immunosuppressant90 (73.8)46 (76.7)44 (71.0)0.474SLEDAI-2K3.65±2.334.00±2.343.30±2.290.097PGA0.56±0.650.67±0.690.45±0.600.003LLDAS78 (63.9)36 (60.0)42(67.7)0.251Remission0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n/aPresence of comorbidity87 (71.3)40 (66.7)47 (75.8)0.264SDI0.93±1.151.08±1.280.78±0.980.243HAQ-DI0.23±0.460.25±0.470.21±0.440.571HADS:Anxiety scaleDepression scale6.07±4.125.72±4.316.20±4.195.73±3.935.93±4.095.70±4.680.7200.724

Data are reported as mean ± SD or number (%). LLDAS: lupus low disease activity state; SDI: Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index; HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; and HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ho SO: None declared, Evelyn Chow: None declared, Tena K. Li: None declared, Sze-Lok Lau: None declared, Isaac T. Cheng: None declared, Cheuk-Chun Szeto: None declared, Lai-Shan Tam Grant/research support from: Grants from Novartis and Pfizer.

POS1222 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH USE OF TELEMEDICINE FOR FOLLOW-UP OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS IN THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK

Background:

It is important to weigh the potential risk of exposure to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during a doctor visits against the risk of missing disease controls in patients with lupus nephritis during the COVID-19. Telemedicine (TM) follow-up is a reasonable option. Despite the recent exponential increase in application worldwide, there is no study examining the clinical factors associated with the patients‘ choice of TM use in lupus nephritis.

Objectives:

In this study, we aimed to examine the clinical variables associated with a higher preference for TM follow-up in patients with lupus nephritis.

Methods:

Consecutive patients followed at the lupus nephritis clinic were contacted for their preferred mode of follow-up. The demographic, socioeconomic and clinical data of the first 140 patients opted for TM and 140 patients preferred to continue standard in-person follow-up were collected and compared.

Results:

The mean age of the 280 recruited patients was 45.6 ± 11.8 years. The mean disease duration was 15.0 ± 9.2 years. The majority of them had lupus nephritis class III, IV or V (88.2%) and were on prednisolone (90%). Three quarters of the patients (67.1%) were on immunosuppressants. The mean SLEDAI-2k was 4.06 ± 2.54, physician global assessment (PGA) 0.46 ± 0.62 and SLICC/ACR damage index 1.11 ± 1.36. A significant proportion of the patients (72.1%) had one or more comorbidities. It was found that patients with higher PGA and family monthly income (> USD3,800) preferred TM, while fulltime employees preferred in-person follow-up (Table 1). These predictors remained significant after controlling for age in the multivariate analysis with odd ratios for PGA 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.09), family income >USD3,800 1.90 (95% CI 1.24-3.79) and fulltime employment 0.53 (95% CI 0.32-0.88). PGA was noted to be positively correlated with the perceptions that TM reduces (r=0.13, p=0.036) and routine visit increases (r=0.12, p=0.04) the risk of COVID-19 during the outbreak.

Conclusion:

When choosing the mode of care delivery between TM and clinic visit, the patient’s disease activity as well as employment and economic status appeared to be important.

Table 1.

Demographic, socio-economic and disease data of the recruited lupus nephritis patients with comparison between the telemedicine/standard follow-up groups

Overall (n=280)Telemedicine group (n=140)Standard follow-up group (n=140)P-valueAge in years45.6±11.844.6±11.446.6±12.10.159Gender: Female256 (91.4)127 (90.7)129 (92.1)0.669Ever presence of rash170 (60.8)87 (62.1)82 (58.6)0.527Ever presence of joint pain174 (62.1)92 (65.7)82 (58.6)0.247Disease duration in months15.8±9.515.0±9.316.5±9.60.17624 hour urine proteinuria in gram0.45±0.600.50±0.630.40±0.570.176Daily prednisolone dose in mg8.82±6.15.28±4.466.35±7.370.143Use of immunosuppressant188 (67.1)96 (68.6)92 (65.7)0.611SLEDAI-2K3.39±2.353.51±2.283.26±2.410.366PGA0.46±0.620.54±0.630.38±0.590.025LLDAS196 (70)92 (0.66)104 (74.3)0.160Presence of comorbidity202 (72.1)100 (71.4)102 (72.9)0.790SDI0.97±1.230.95±1.211.00±1.260.732HAQ-DI0.20±0.400.23±0.450.18±0.340.300HADS: Anxiety scale5.93±3.985.86±4.066.00±3.910.776 Depression scale5.57±3.915.56±4.255.59±3.540.954Education level: tertiary or above122 (43.6)63 (45.0)59 (42.1)0.746Fulltime employment127 (45.4)56 (40.0)71 (50.7)0.041Occupation: professionals36 (12.9)22 (15.7)14 (10.0)0.181Monthly family income > USD3,80084 (30.0)51 (36.4)33 (23.6)0.028

Data are reported as mean ± SD or number (%). HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; PGA: physician global assessment; LLDAS: lupus low disease activity state and SDI: Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ho SO: None declared, Evelyn Chow: None declared, Tena K. Li: None declared, Isaac T. Cheng: None declared, Sze-Lok Lau: None declared, Cheuk-Chun Szeto: None declared, Lai-Shan Tam Grant/research support from: Grants from Novartis and Pfizer

POS0094 EFFECTS OF RANKL INHIBITION ON PROMOTING HEALING OF BONE EROSION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS USING HR-pQCT: A 2-YEAR, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background:

Partial repair of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is known from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computer tomography (HR-pQCT) studies in patients with moderate to high disease activity using biologics [1]. Whether RANKL inhibition by denosumab is efficacious in healing existing erosions in RA patients with low disease activity or in remission on conventional synthetic DMARDs is uncertain.

Objectives:

To evaluate the effects of denosumab on erosion healing at 2-4 metacarpophalangeal head as determined by HR-pQCT in patients with RA with stable disease.

Methods:

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. RA patients with disease activity score 28 joints (DAS28) ≤5.1 were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg or placebo once every six months for 24 months. The primary outcome was erosion healing at MCP 2-4 on HR-pQCT at 12 months. The effects of denosumab on erosion and joint space parameters on HR-pQCT and radiographs, disease activity and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) were also examined.

Results:

At 24 months, HR-pQCT images were analyzed in 98 patients. Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics and imaging parameters were comparable between the two treatment groups (table 1). Seventeen patients in each group (placebo group: 17/52, 32.6%; denosumab group: 17/50, 34.0%) achieved sustained low disease activity (DAS28 ≤ 3.2) throughout the 24 months. At 12 months, changes in erosion parameters on HR-pQCT were similar between the two groups. At 24 months, new erosions (19% vs 9%, p=0.009) and erosion progression (34% vs 16%, p<0.001) were more common in the placebo group than the denosumab group. Erosion healing was seen in a significantly higher proportion of patients in the denosumab group (20% vs 6%, p=0.045) at 24 months. The details of the changes in HR-pQCT erosion parameters are shown in figure 1. No significant differences in the changes in joint space parameters on HR-pQCT, van der Heijde-Sharp erosion score, DAS28 and HAQ-DI were observed between the two groups at 12 and 24 months.

Table 1.

Baseline clinical, demographic, disease activity parameters and medications

Placebo (n=55)Denosumab (n=55)Total (n=110)Age56.5 ± 7.157.2 ± 8.556.8 ± 7.8Gender (Female)47 (86)41 (75)88 (80)Disease duration (years)8.5 ± 6.87.3 ± 6.97.9 ± 6.8Rheumatoid factor positive40 (72)38 (69)78 (71)ACPA positive43 (78)44 (80)87 (79)DAS28-CRP2.43 ± 0.832.6 ± 0.922.51 ± 0.88DAS28-CRP>3.28 (15)13 (24)21 (19)HAQ-DI (0-3)0.31 ± 0.380.46 ± 0.470.39 ± 0.43csDMARDs49 (89)52 (95)101 (92)Combination csDMARDs26 (47)33 (60)59 (54)Glucocorticoids5 (10)5 (9)10 (9)vdH- Sharp erosion score10.4 ± 18.48.9 ± 13.89.6 ± 16.2vdH- Sharp JSN score12.4 ± 17.711.5 ± 17.211.9 ± 17.4Lumbar spine aBMD, g/cm20.914 ± 0.1470.930 ± 0.1430.922 ± 0.145Total hip aBMD, g/cm20.837 ± 0.1020.847 ± 0.1460.841 ± 0.125Femoral neck aBMD, g/cm20.681 ± 0.0990.695 ± 0.1280.687 ± 0.114

Data are reported as mean ± SD or number (%). ACPA: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; DAS28: disease activity score 28; csDMARDs: conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug. HAQ-DI: health assessment questionnaire disability index; vdH- Sharp score: Van der Heijde- Sharp score; aBMD: areal bone mineral density

Conclusion:

Although no differences in erosion parameters were observed at 12 months, denosumab was more efficacious than placebo in erosion repair on HR-pQCT after 24 months.

References:

[1]Finzel S, Rech J, Schmidt S, et al. Interleukin-6 receptor blockade induces limited repair of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a micro CT study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:396-400.

Figure 1.

Changes in erosion parameters by HR-pQCT. (A) Percentage of patients with overall erosion healing; (B) Outcome of individual erosion with healing, progression and new erosion detected across study period; change in (C) mean erosion volume; (D) total erosion volume; (E) erosion width; (F) erosion depth and (G) marginal osteosclerosis per patient.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ho SO: None declared, Isaac T. Cheng: None declared, Sze-Lok Lau: None declared, Evelyn Chow: None declared, Tommy Lam: None declared, Vivian W Hung: None declared, Edmund Li: None declared, James F Griffith: None declared, Vivian WY Lee: None declared, Lin Shi: None declared, Junbin Huang: None declared, Yan Kitty Kwok: None declared, Isaac C Yim: None declared, Tena K. Li: None declared, Vincent Lo: None declared, Jolly M Lee: None declared, Jack Jock Wai Lee: None declared, Ling Qin: None declared, Lai-Shan Tam Grant/research support from: Grants from Novartis and Pfizer

Cardiac arrhythmias and electrophysiologic responses during spontaneous hyperglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus

AIM

We examined the effect of spontaneous hyperglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and without history of cardiovascular disease on heart rate variability (HRV), cardiac repolarisation and incidence of cardiac arrhythmias.

METHODS

Thirty-seven individuals with T1DM (age 17-50 years, 19 males, mean duration of diabetes 19.3 SD(9.6) years) underwent 96 h of simultaneous ambulatory 12-lead Holter ECG and blinded continuous interstitial glucose (IG) monitoring (CGM). HRV, QT interval and cardiac repolarisation were assessed during hyperglycaemia (IG ≥ 15 mmol/l) and compared with matched euglycaemia (IG 5-10 mmol/l) on a different day, separately during the day and night. Rates of arrhythmias were assessed by calculating incidence rate differences.

RESULTS

Simultaneous ECG and CGM data were recorded for 2395 hours. During daytime hyperglycaemia vs euglycaemia the mean QT_c interval duration was 404 SD(21)ms vs 407 SD(20)ms, P = 0.263. T-peak to T-end interval duration corrected for heart rate (T_pT_endc) shortened: 74.8 SD(16.1)ms vs 79.0 SD(14.8)ms, P = 0.033 and T-wave symmetry increased: 1.62 SD(0.33) vs 1.50 SD(0.39), P = 0.02. During night-time hyperglycaemia vs euglycaemia, the mean QT_c interval duration was 401 SD(26)ms vs 404 SD(27)ms, P = 0.13 and T_pT_end shortened: 62.4 SD(12.0)ms vs 67.1 SD(11.8)ms, P = 0.003. The number of cardiac arrhythmias was low and confined to bradycardia and isolated ectopic beats. A considerable inter-subject and diurnal variability was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperglycaemia in individuals with T1DM without known cardiovascular disease was not associated with clinically important cardiac arrhythmias.

Framing of the opioid problem in cancer pain management in Canada

Two guidelines about opioid use in chronic pain management were published in 2017: the Canadian Guideline for Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain and the European Pain Federation position paper on appropriate opioid use in chronic pain management. Though the target populations for the guidelines are the same, their recommendations differ depending on their purpose. The intent of the Canadian guideline is to reduce the incidence of serious adverse effects. Its goal was therefore to set limits on the use of opioids. In contrast, the European Pain Federation position paper is meant to promote safe and appropriate opioid use for chronic pain. The content of the two guidelines could have unintentional consequences on other populations that receive opioid therapy for symptom management, such as patients with cancer. In this article, we present expert opinion about those chronic pain management guidelines and their impact on patients with cancer diagnoses, especially those with histories of substance use disorder and psychiatric conditions. Though some principles of chronic pain management can be extrapolated, we recommend that guidelines for cancer pain management should be developed using empirical data primarily from patients with cancer who are receiving opioid therapy.

Abstract P3-12-05: Fractionation patterns in adjuvant breast radiotherapy in Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2015

Purpose: To report the patterns of use of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) (≤16 fractions)in breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients in Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2015 and identify factors related to HFRT use.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of Ontario women diagnosed with breast cancer or DCIS followed by adjuvant breast or chest wall radiation (RT) from 2009 to 2015 was conducted using data from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with HFRT use. Physician was included as a random effect. To calculate the potential amount of time that could be saved if all patients were to receive 16 fractions of HFRT, the number of extra RT treatments after the 16th visit was multiplied by the median amount of time spent to treat one patient at our cancer centre (8.76 minutes). This time was found with Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre data collected from October 2017 to March 2018 (n=523) and represents the amount of time from when a patient enters the RT unit for treatment setup, until the RT beam is turned off.

Results: A total of 42,072 patients were included. Most patients were aged between 50 and 69 years old (56.7%) with stage I or II breast cancer (74.6%) and had breast conserving surgery (BCS) (76.9%). Half previously received chemotherapy and 7.9% were DCIS patients. Use of sequential boost, simultaneous boost, and regional nodal RT was 17.2%, 3.1%, and 31.7% respectively. Institutional variation in HFRT use ranged from 27.5% to 71.6%. HFRT use has increased in all patient populations over the study period. HFRT use was more common in breast cancer and DCIS patients with BCS than in chest wall and nodal RT. Simultaneous boost (OR=0.09), nodal RT (OR=0.08), previous chemotherapy (OR=0.7), stage 0, II, and III breast cancer (OR=0.06 relative to stage I), were correlated with less HFRT use. Older age, later year of diagnosis, sequential boost (OR=0.09), BCS and no surgery (OR=1.2, 1.5 relative to mastectomy) were correlated with higher HFRT use. Institution was significantly correlated to HFRT use. The variance estimate for the physician random effect was 0.33 (p&lt;0.0001). For breast cancer patients with BCS and breast RT specifically, 62,396 extra visits occurred from 2009 to 2015, corresponding to ˜9100 hours of treatment if all patients received HFRT. For the entire patient population, a total of 190,726 extra visits occurred or ˜27,900 hours.

Trends in the use of HFRT (%) from 2009 to 2015 for DCIS and breast cancer patients in Ontario.YearStage I-IV + BCS + Breast RTStage I-IV + BCS + Breast + Nodal RTStage I-IV + Mastectomy + Breast RTStage I-IV + Mastectomy + Breast + Nodal RTDCIS + BCS200962.610.329.09.545.2201062.06.323.76.951.2201162.24.121.34.752.7201263.79.621.711.452.0201365.112.629.315.057.3201469.37.835.415.164.5201573.711.839.217.573.4BCS: breast conserving surgery, RT: radiation treatment

Conclusions: HFRT use in Ontario has increased over time for all patient populations, and reflects the current evidence supporting HFRT in different patient populations, with lower HFRT use seen in chest wall and nodal RT and higher HFRT use in early-stage breast cancer patients with BCS.

Citation Format: Chow E, Chan S, Yao Z, Sutradhar R, Lee J, Wan BA, Paszat L. Fractionation patterns in adjuvant breast radiotherapy in Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2015 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-05.

Treatment Outcomes in Male Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 161 Patients

AIMS

Male breast cancer is a rare disease with limited evidence-based guidelines for treatment. This study aimed to identify demographic, pathological and clinical factors associated with its prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 161 male breast cancer patients diagnosed at a single institution from 1987 to June 2017 was conducted. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment and outcome were extracted and included in competing-risk analysis and the univariate Cox proportional hazard model for univariate analysis. Factors with P < 0.10 were included in multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnosis was 67 years (standard deviation = 11.2) and the median follow-up duration was 5.3 years (range 0-25 years). There were 48 deaths, including 23 cancer-specific deaths. The actuarial median survival was 19.9 years. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with overall survival were size of tumours (hazard ratio 2.0; 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.7, P < 0.0001) and diagnosis of metastatic disease (hazard ratio 8.7; 95% confidence interval 1.9-40.6; P = 0.006). Of 138 patients without metastases at diagnoses, 11 had local-regional recurrence and 26 had distant metastases. In the multivariable model for local-regional recurrence, a more recent year of diagnosis was associated with reduced risk (hazard ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.0, P = 0.008), whereas more positive lymph nodes was associated with higher risk (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.0, P = 0.01). A higher risk of metastases was associated with more positive lymph nodes (hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.3; P = 0.03) and tumour size (hazard ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.9; P = 0.01). A higher risk of any recurrence or metastases was associated with the number of positive nodes (hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2-3.0; P = 0.005) and tumour size (hazard ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In general, tumour size and more positive lymph nodes were associated with worse prognosis. Larger powered studies are needed to identify prognostic factors with smaller effect sizes.

A neurogenetic model for the study of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: the International 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Brain Behavior Consortium

Rare copy number variants contribute significantly to the risk for schizophrenia, with the 22q11.2 locus consistently implicated. Individuals with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) have an estimated 25-fold increased risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, compared to individuals in the general population. The International 22q11DS Brain Behavior Consortium is examining this highly informative neurogenetic syndrome phenotypically and genomically. Here we detail the procedures of the effort to characterize the neuropsychiatric and neurobehavioral phenotypes associated with 22q11DS, focusing on schizophrenia and subthreshold expression of psychosis. The genomic approach includes a combination of whole-genome sequencing and genome-wide microarray technologies, allowing the investigation of all possible DNA variation and gene pathways influencing the schizophrenia-relevant phenotypic expression. A phenotypically rich data set provides a psychiatrically well-characterized sample of unprecedented size (n=1616) that informs the neurobehavioral developmental course of 22q11DS. This combined set of phenotypic and genomic data will enable hypothesis testing to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

High risk of conversion to diabetes in first-degree relatives of individuals with young-onset type 2 diabetes: a 12-year follow-up analysis

AIM

Family history of diabetes is an established risk factor for Type 2 diabetes, but the impact of a family history of young-onset diabetes (onset < 40 years) on future risk of diabetes among first-degree relatives is unclear. In this prospective study, we examined the influence of family history of late- versus young-onset diabetes on the development of diabetes in a young to middle-aged Chinese population.

METHODS

Some 365 siblings identified through probands with Type 2 diabetes and 452 participants from a community-based health awareness project (aged 18-55 years) who underwent metabolic assessment during the period 1998-2002 were followed to 2012-2013 to determine their glycaemic status. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the association of family history of diabetes presented at different age categories with development of diabetes.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 53.4% (n = 167) of participants with a family history of young-onset diabetes, 30.1% (n = 68) of those with a family history of late-onset diabetes and 14.4% (n = 40) of those without a family history developed diabetes. Using logistic regression, family history of diabetes presented at ages ≥ 50, 40-49, 30-39 and < 30 years, increased conversion to diabetes with respective odds ratios of 2.4, 5.8, 9.4 and 7.0 (P < 0.001 for all), after adjustment for socio-economic status, smoking, obesity, hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Among participants without diabetes at baseline, risk association of family history of late-onset diabetes with incident diabetes was not sustained, whereas that of family history of young-onset diabetes remained robust on further adjustment for baseline glycaemic measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

First-degree relatives of people with Type 2 diabetes, especially relatives of those with young-onset diabetes, are at high risk for diabetes.

Physician preferences for bone metastasis drug therapy in Canada

BACKGROUND

Currently in Canada, several bone-targeted agents (btas) with varying characteristics are available for the prevention of skeletal-related events (sres) in patients with bone metastasis secondary to solid tumours. In the present study, we evaluated the preferences of physicians in Canada for the various attributes of the available btas.

METHODS

Physicians treating patients with bone metastasis from solid tumours were invited to complete an online discrete-choice experiment. Respondents were asked to choose between pairs of hypothetical medications for virtual patients. Each hypothetical medication was described based on predefined key attributes: time until first sre, time until worsening of pain, medication-related annual risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (onj), medication-related annual risk of renal impairment, and mode of administration. A random-parameters logit model was used to analyze the choices between hypothetical medications and thus infer physician preferences for medication attributes.

RESULTS

Responses from the 200 physicians who completed the discrete-choice experiment suggested that months until first sre, risk of renal impairment, and months until worsening of pain were considered the most important attributes affecting choice of bta. The annual risk of onj was considered the least important attribute.

CONCLUSIONS

When making treatment decisions about the choice of bta for patients with bone metastasis from solid tumours, delaying sres and worsening of pain, and reducing the risk of renal impairment are primary considerations for physicians in Canada.

Ondansetron rapidly dissolving film for the prophylactic treatment of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting-a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of an ondansetron rapidly dissolving film (rdf) in the prophylaxis of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting (rinv). Rapidly dissolving film formulations facilitate drug delivery in circumstances in which swallowing the medication might be difficult for the patient.

METHODS

Patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy at risk for rinv were prescribed ondansetron rdf 8 mg twice daily while on treatment and were asked to complete a nausea and vomiting-specific daily diary, the Functional Living Index-Emesis (flie), and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C15 Palliative (qlq-C15-pal). Patients were categorized as receiving primary or secondary prophylaxis based on whether they had already experienced emetic episodes. "Overall control" was defined as a maximum increase of 2 episodes of nausea or vomiting from baseline. "Acute phase" was defined as the days during radiation until the first day after radiation; "delayed phase" was defined as days 2-10 after radiation.

RESULTS

The study accrued 30 patients. Rates of overall control for nausea and for vomiting during the acute phase in the primary prophylaxis group were 88% and 93% respectively; during the delayed phase, they were 73% and 75%. Rates of overall control for nausea and for vomiting during the acute phase in the secondary prophylaxis group were both 100%; during the delayed phase, they were 50%. The number of nausea and vomiting episodes was found to be significantly correlated with the flie and qlq-C15-pal questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Ondansetron rdf is effective for the prophylaxis of rinv.

Doctor, what are my options? A prospective cohort study of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

For cancer patients, information about their disease and its treatment is often delivered within a short time period, potentially leading to patient misunderstanding, which can impede optimal patient care. In this 3-part clinical study, we investigated the utility of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal (gi) cancer starting a new treatment.

METHODS

In part 1, a comprehensive literature search identified items for potential inclusion in the care plan. Those items were formatted into a questionnaire. The questionnaire was then administered to patients as a structured interview. In part 2, health care professionals involved in the care of patients with gi cancer evaluated the resulting care plan for content and relevancy. In part 3, a 20-week prospective cohort study (10 weeks using standard of care, 10 weeks using individualized care plans) was conducted. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 2-4 weeks after administration of the care plan.

RESULTS

In part 1, a 73-item questionnaire was developed and completed by 20 patients in semi-structured interviews. In part 2, long and short versions of the care plan were created. Most health care professionals preferred the long version. Based on their comments, a final version of the care plan was created. The part 3 study enrolled 104 patients. Overall satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the intervention group at baseline (p = 0.010) and follow-up (p = 0.005). Compared with control patients, the intervention cohort also reported significantly higher overall quality of life (p = 0.044) and fewer symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.048) at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Provision of an individualized care plan resulted in improvements in outcome measures at both baseline and follow-up. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Frailty and mortality in kidney transplant recipients

We have previously described strong associations between frailty, a measure of physiologic reserve initially described and validated in geriatrics, and early hospital readmission as well as delayed graft function. The goal of this study was to estimate its association with postkidney transplantation (post-KT) mortality. Frailty was prospectively measured in 537 KT recipients at the time of transplantation between November 2008 and August 2013. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for confounders using a novel approach to substantially improve model efficiency and generalizability in single-center studies. We precisely estimated the confounder coefficients using the large sample size of the Scientific Registry of Transplantation Recipients (n = 37 858) and introduced these into the single-center model, which then estimated the adjusted frailty coefficient. At 5 years, the survivals were 91.5%, 86.0% and 77.5% for nonfrail, intermediately frail and frail KT recipients, respectively. Frailty was independently associated with a 2.17-fold (95% CI: 1.01-4.65, p = 0.047) higher risk of death. In conclusion, regardless of age, frailty is a strong, independent risk factor for post-KT mortality, even after carefully adjusting for many confounders using a novel, efficient statistical approach.

Quantifying BTEX in aqueous solutions with potentially interfering hydrocarbons using a partially selective sensor array

A sensor array measured the concentration of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, p-xylene and naphthalene in water samples that also contained 16 other hydrocarbons.

Aprepitant and granisetron for the prophylaxis of radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic radiotherapy for bone metastases: a prospective pilot study

PURPOSE

We evaluated the novel combination of aprepitant and granisetron for the prophylaxis of radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (rinv) among patients receiving moderately-emetogenic radiotherapy for thoracolumbar bone metastases.

METHODS

In this single-centre two-arm nonrandomized prospective pilot study, patients undergoing single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) received aprepitant 125 mg and granisetron 2 mg on the day of radiotherapy and aprepitant 80 mg on each of the first 2 days after the day of radiotherapy. Patients undergoing multiple-fraction radiotherapy (20 Gy in 5 fractions) received aprepitant 125 mg on day 1 of radiotherapy, aprepitant 80 mg on days 3 and 5 of radiotherapy, and granisetron 2 mg on every day of radiotherapy. Symptoms and total medication intake were recorded daily during the acute phase (day 1 of radiotherapy until the first day after the last day of radiotherapy), and the delayed phase (days 2-10 after the last day of radiotherapy). Control of vomiting, retching, and nausea was defined as no symptoms and no use of rescue medication.

RESULTS

Control rates for single-fraction patients (n = 13) were 100% for acute nausea, 62% for delayed nausea, 100% for acute vomiting and retching, and 85% for delayed vomiting and retching. Control rates for multiple-fraction patients (n = 6) were 67% for acute nausea, 83% for delayed nausea, 67% for acute vomiting and retching, and 83% for delayed vomiting and retching. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities attributable to the study intervention were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of aprepitant and granisetron was safe and efficacious for the prophylaxis of rinv after both single- and multiple-fraction moderately emetogenic radiotherapy for thoracolumbar bone metastases. Our results require confirmation in a larger population.

Discrete event simulation of patient admissions to a neurovascular unit

Evidence exists that clinical outcomes improve for stroke patients admitted to specialized Stroke Units. The Toronto Western Hospital created a Neurovascular Unit (NVU) using beds from general internal medicine, Neurology and Neurosurgery to care for patients with stroke and acute neurovascular conditions. Using patient-level data for NVU-eligible patients, a discrete event simulation was created to study changes in patient flow and length of stay pre- and post-NVU implementation. Varying patient volumes and resources were tested to determine the ideal number of beds under various conditions. In the first year of operation, the NVU admitted 507 patients, over 66% of NVU-eligible patient volumes. With the introduction of the NVU, length of stay decreased by around 8%. Scenario testing showed that the current level of 20 beds is sufficient for accommodating the current demand and would continue to be sufficient with an increase in demand of up to 20%.