Perceptions of online surgical-focused learning amongst surgeons during the COVID pandemic: A scoping review 2020-22

INTRODUCTION

During the COVID pandemic many centres adopted e-learning as a tool to adhere to social distancing recommendations while continuing to provide ongoing postgraduate medical education. We aimed to complete this scoping review in order to map experience and perceptions amongst surgeons and surgical trainees to remote learning during the COVID pandemic.

METHODS

Using Arksey and O'Malley's five step model for conducting a scoping review, a systematic search strategy was undertaken across three online databases SCOPUS, MEDLINE and Web of Science. Only original articles in English in the field of postgraduate education in surgery were included.

RESULTS

44 studies were selected for review. Of these 44, 21 were studies of perception of a newly developed e-learning tool/platform. 17 were surveys of surgeon's attitudes towards e-learning during the COVID pandemic. The remaining 6 studies were studies of knowledge or skills acquired through new e-learning, which included a survey of experience. The United States was the most common country of origin with General Surgery the most represented surgical speciality. Response rates across all three study subgroups were on average >60%. Surgeon's experience of e-learning was reported in only positive terms in 86% (n = 38/44) of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper is informative in that it focuses specifically on surgeons' perceptions of a e-learning tools used in addition to skills or knowledge gained. Positive e-learning experience reported in these studies may lead to more blended learning curriculums being developed, deployed and evaluated going forward.

The Use of Arteriovenous Fistulae as an Adjunct to Peripheral Arterial Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial bypass is an effective procedure for the management of patients with critical limb ischaemia. However, it is commonly associated with high rates of graft occlusion and subsequent limb loss. This is particularly apparent when the distal anastomosis is to the below-knee arterial segment. A number of studies have suggested that an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) sited at the distal anastomosis may reduce afterload, improve graft patency, and boost subsequent limb salvage. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of adjuvant AVF on the outcomes of peripheral arterial bypass.

METHODS

The following databases were searched up to May 2015: Medline through Pubmed; the Cochrane Library; EMBASE; and reference lists of articles.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY

All randomised controlled and observational studies that assessed the role of AVF as an adjunct to peripheral arterial bypass were included. Studies were required to include at least one pre-defined outcome. Data were extracted and assessed by two reviewers with any disagreements adjudicated on by the senior author. Pooled risk ratios were calculated using a random effects model. Additional subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Two randomised controlled trials and seven retrospective cohort studies comprising 966 participants were included. Pooled standardized data showed no difference in primary graft patency (pooled RR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.73-2.16), secondary patency (pooled RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.66), or limb salvage at 12-months (pooled RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.80-1.60) for the peripheral bypass with AVF group compared with peripheral bypass alone. Subgroup analysis indicated a reduction in reintervention rates associated with AVF when performed in conjunction with a synthetic graft (pooled RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Although adjuvant AVF is not associated with additional operative complication there is little evidence to support its use. The evidence assessing its merits is weakened by small, retrospective studies with heterogeneous cohorts.

Bilateral Breast Cancer: Analysis of Incidence, Characteristics and Outcome of the Disease

Background: Despite the widespread adoption of breast conservation therapy in breast cancer, there is a dramatic increase in the rate of bilateral mastectomy in USA. The aim of this study was to address the incidence of bilateral breast cancer (BBC) and to investigate its characteristics, survival and outcome compared to unilateral breast cancer.Methods: Data was acquired from the prospectively maintained NUI Galway breast cancer database between 1988 and 2008. BBC were then categorized as synchronous (within 12 months) or metachronous cancer (after 12 months of first tumour). SPSS was used for data analysis.Results: The incidence of bilateral breast cancer in our population was 4.4% (112 of 2524). Of those 2.1% were synchronous while 2.3% were metachronous. Compared to unilateral cases, bilateral cancer patients were younger (0=0.021) and had smaller size (p=0.001) and earlier stage (p<0.001) tumours at diagnosis. There were no differences in histological type (p=0.630) and grade (p=0.054)). While there was no significant difference in survival for patients with bilateral compared to unilateral tumour (p>0.05), the synchronous bilateral tumour was associated with poor overall survival (p=0.010) and disease free survival (p=0.013) in comparison to metachronous bilateral tumour.Conclusion: We observed significant differences in bilateral tumour characteristics compared to unilateral disease. Although bilateral synchronous tumour was associated with poor outcome and overall survival, patients with metachronous disease do as well as patients with unilateral tumour. The increasing practice of bilateral mastectomy is not supported by this large single centre experience.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5033.