Validation of a screening algorithm for hepatic fibrosis by Doppler ultrasound and elastography in a general population

BACKGROUND

Early detection can prevent the initial stages of fibrosis from progressing to cirrhosis.

PURPOSE

To evaluate an algorithm combining three echographic indicators and elastographic measurements to screen for hepatic fibrosis in an unselected population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From May 2017 to June 2018, all patients with no history and no known chronic liver disease who were referred for an ultrasound (US) were prospectively included in eight hospitals. The indicators being sought were liver surface irregularity, demodulation of hepatic veins, and spleen length >110 mm. Patients presenting at least one of these underwent elastography measurements with virtual touch quantification (VTQ) or supersonic shear imaging (SSI). If elastography was positive, patients were referred to hepatologist for fibrosis evaluation. Reference standard was obtained by FibroMeter^VCTE or biopsy. A FibroMeter^VCTE result >0.384 indicated a "necessary referral" to a hepatologist.

RESULTS

Of the 1501 patients included, 504 (33.6%) were positive for at least one US indicator. All of them underwent US elastography, with 85 being positive. Of the patients, 58 (3.6%) had a consultation with a liver specialist: 21 had positive FibroMeter^VCTE and nine had an indication of biopsy for suspicion of fibrosis. This screening algorithm made it possible to diagnose 1.6% of patients in our population with unknown fibrosis. Of the patients, 50% referred to the liver specialist were "necessary referrals."

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that three simple US indicators with no systematic elastographic measurement could be applied in day-to-day practice to look for hepatic fibrosis in an unsuspected population allowing relevant referrals to a hepatologist.

Hepatitis C treatment with all-oral direct-acting antivirals: Effectiveness and tolerance in a multicenter, prospective, observational study from French general hospitals (APROVVIE, ANGH)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

According to clinical trials, the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with second-generation direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) is highly efficient and well tolerated. The goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of various combinations of these drugs during their first 2 years of use in the real-world practice of French general hospitals.

METHODS

Data from patients treated with all-oral DAAs in 24 French non-academic hospital centers from March 1, 2014 to January 1, 2016, were prospectively recorded. The sustained virological response 12-24 weeks after treatment (SVR 12-24) was estimated and severe adverse events (SAE) were evaluated and their predictive factors were determined using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Data from 1123 patients were analyzed. The population was 69% genotype (G) 1, 13% G3, 11.5% G4, 5% G2, 49% with cirrhosis and 55% treatment-experienced. The treatment regimens were sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (38%), sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (32%), sofosbuvir/simeprevir (17%), ombitasvir+paritaprevir+ritonavir (5%) (with dasabuvir 3.5%), and sofosbuvir/ribavirin (8%). Ribavirin was given to 24% of patients. The SVR 12-24 was 91.0% (95% CI: 89.2-92.5%). Sofosbuvir-ribavirin was less effective than other regimens. The independent predictors of SVR 12-24 by logistic regression were body weight, albumin, previous hepatocellular carcinoma and treatment regimen (sofosbuvir/ribavirin vs. others). Sixty-four severe adverse events (SAE) were observed in 59 [5.6%] patients, and were independently predicted by cirrhosis and baseline hemoglobin. Serum creatinine increased during treatment (mean 8.5%, [P<10^-5]), satisfying criteria for acute kidney injury in 62 patients (7.3%). Patient-reported overall tolerance was excellent, and patient-reported fatigue decreased during and after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Second generation DAAs combinations are as effective and well tolerated in a « real-world » population as in clinical trials. Further studies are needed on renal tolerance.

Effects of Age on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C with Direct Acting Antivirals

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Data on the efficacy and tolerance of interferon-free treatment in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in elderly patients are limited in phase II-III trials.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective cohort of adult patients with CHC treated in French general hospitals.

RESULTS

Data from 1,123 patients, distributed into four age groups, were analyzed. Of these, 278 were > 64 years old (fourth quartile) and 133 were > 73 years old (tenth decile). Elderly patients weighed less, were more frequently treatment-experienced women infected with genotype 1b or 2, while they less frequently had genotype 3 or HIV coinfection, but had more frequent comorbidities and drug consumption. Half of the patients had cirrhosis, whatever their ages. The main treatment regimens were sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (37.8%), sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (31.8%), sofosbuvir/simeprevir (16.9%), sofosbuvir/ribavirin (7.8%); ribavirin was given to 24% of patients. The overall sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 91.0 % (95% CI: 89.292.5%) with no difference according to age. Logistic regression of the independent predictors of SVR were albumin, hepatocellular carcinoma and treatment regimen, but not age. The rate of severe adverse events (66 in 59/1062 [5.6%] patients) tended to be greater in patients older than 64 years of age (21/261,8.1%), but the only independent predictors of SAE by logistic regression were cirrhosis and baseline hemoglobin. Patient-reported overall tolerance was excellent in all age groups, and patient-reported fatigue decreased during and after treatment, independent of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The high efficacy and tolerance of interferon-free regimens is confirmed in elderly patients in real-life conditions.

[The Hepatitis Network in Maine-et-Loire city hospitals: six year follow-up of patients and physicians. Hepatitis Network of Maine-et-Loire]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate 6 years of a city-hospital hepatitis network. The network was set up in 3 steps: 1988: intrahospital network, 1991: city-hospital network, 1997: compliance with government regulations.

METHODS

The whole activity from 1991 to 1997 was evaluated and special attention was paid to patient files and participating physicians.

RESULTS

From June 1991 to December 1997 (6.5 years), 759 patient files were registered which corresponds to 531 patients (male 57%) with a mean age of 44 +/- 16 years (+/- standard deviation). Four hundred and twenty one patients (79%) had hepatitis C, 95 (18%) hepatitis B and 15 (3%) co-infection; 83% of patients had had a liver biopsy confirming cirrhosis in 21.5%. The annual number of files registered increased continuously. This was more a result of recruiting known patients than new patients, after the network had been in place for several years, mainly with hepatitis B virus (known patients in 1997: hepatitis B virus: 53% vs 33% for hepatitis C virus, P<0.05). Treatment protocols (73%) were more frequent for hepatitis C virus patients than for hepatitis B (73% vs 59%, P<0.01). Therapeutic trial proposals (37%) increased from 21% in 1991 to 59% in 1997, P<0.01. Participation in monthly meetings by academic hepato-gastroenterologists increased slightly while that of regional hospital hepato-gastroenterologists increased markedly and that of private hepato-gastroenterologists remained stable. The annual proportion of files submitted by academic hepato-gastroenterologists decreased in parallel to the increase in submission of patient files by other hepato-gastroenterologists.

CONCLUSIONS

During 6 years of activity, the network grew with an increase in the annual number of patient files, growing participation in therapeutic trials as well as in monthly meetings by practitioners.