Three palonosetron regimens to prevent CINV in myeloma patients receiving multiple-day high-dose melphalan and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Explore safety and efficacy of three palonosetron-containing regimens for emesis prevention over 7 days in multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving melphalan (100 mg/m(2)) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Randomized, double-blind pilot study in MM patients (n=73) receiving 1, 2, or 3 days of 0.25 mg palonosetron (30-s i.v. bolus) 30 min before melphalan (days -2 and -1) and HSCT (day 0). Patients received dexamethasone (20 mg i.v., days -2 and -1) immediately before or after study drug/placebo. Daily diaries recorded emesis, rescue medication, nausea duration, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Seven-day complete protection (no emesis) occurred in 41.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1% to 63.4%], 41.7% (95% CI 22.1% to 63.4%), and 44.0% (95% CI 24.2% to 65.1%) of patients receiving 1, 2, or 3 days of palonosetron, respectively (P=0.43). Complete response (emesis free without rescue medication) occurred in 8.3%, 20.8%, and 20.0% (P=0.14). Common AEs (≥10%) were mild-to-moderate diarrhea, constipation, headache, insomnia, and flatulence. No serious AEs occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Palonosetron with dexamethasone was safe and effective in preventing emesis in MM patients receiving melphalan and HSCT. This pilot study with a limited number of patients suggests that multiple doses of palonosetron could be more effective than a single dose in making patients emesis free without need for rescue medication. However, even multiple doses of palonosetron resulted in only 20% of patients being emesis free without rescue medication, suggesting that further improvement will require development of more effective combination antiemetic therapy.

New approaches to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: from neuropharmacology to clinical investigations

Nausea and vomiting are considered to be among the most distressing consequences of cytotoxic chemotherapies. Currently, there are several novel 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), including ondansetron, granisetron, and dolasetron. These agents provide significant improvement in the management of acute emesis but are ineffective at preventing delayed emesis. In 2003, a new 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, palonosetron HCL (Aloxi), was introduced to the U.S. market. Palonosetron was found to be effective in preventing delayed CINV. Indeed, palonosetron was the first and only 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist approved by the FDA for the prevention of both acute and delayed CINV. More recently, studies on the role of substance P in the emetic process led to the development of aprepitant (Emend) for the prevention of delayed emesis in combination with 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. Despite these major advances, CINV remains uncontrolled in some patients. Current efforts are focused on treating refractory emesis and include both the clinical evaluation of compounds marketed for other indications and the preclinical evaluation of novel molecules targeting other transmitters in the emetic pathway. Ongoing work in pharmacogenomics has postulated several candidate genes that could be involved in emetic sensitivity and responsiveness to antiemetic therapy. Investigations into the pharmacogenomics of CINV may someday be able to aid in the identification of high risk patients and patients unlikely to respond to conventional therapies.

Rankings and symptom assessments of side effects from chemotherapy: insights from experienced patients with ovarian cancer

GOALS OF WORK

Although many patients with ovarian cancer achieve favorable responses to primary chemotherapy, the majority of women will experience recurrence of their cancer. Selection of second- or third-line chemotherapy ultimately depends on patient preferences for different side effects. To better understand this process, we evaluated preferences and symptom distress in patients with ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 70 women with ovarian cancer who had previously received at least three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and currently undergoing chemotherapy for newly diagnosed or recurrent disease were interviewed in an outpatient chemotherapy clinic. The patients were asked to rank order 27 health states using a modified visual analog scale and to complete the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS).

MAIN RESULTS

Most favorable health states included perfect health, clinical remission and complete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Least favorable health states included more severe CINV health states and death. Patients on first-line chemotherapy had less symptom distress, and rated sexual dysfunction, fatigue and memory loss more favorably than patients on second- or third-line chemotherapy (P<0.05). Married patients generally had less symptom distress compared to patients who were not married, but married patients indicated more distress with sexual dysfunction (P=0.04). Married patients rated alopecia less favorably than unmarried patients (P=0.03), but married patients viewed certain CINV health states more favorably (P=0.02-0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

CINV remains one of the most dreaded side effects of chemotherapy. Separate preference profiles exist for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent disease, as well as for married versus unmarried patients. While MSAS scores and VAS rankings showed consistency across some health states, this was not true for CINV, suggesting that current symptom status may only influence patient preferences for selected side effects.

Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics

BACKGROUND

The authors determined the incidence of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis (vomiting) (CINV) among patients receiving highly (HEC) or moderately (MEC) emetogenic chemotherapy. They also assessed whether physicians and nurses accurately recognized the incidence of acute and delayed CINV in their own practices.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study of adult patients receiving HEC or MEC for the first time was performed. Before patient enrollment, medical oncologists and oncology nurses estimated the incidence of acute (Day 1) and delayed (Days 2-5) CINV after first administration of HEC and MEC in their own practices. Eligible patients from their practices then completed a 6-day diary including emetic episodes, nausea assessment, and antiemetic medication use. Observed incidence rates of acute and delayed CINV were compared with physician/nurse predictions.

RESULTS

Twenty-four physicians and nurses and 298 eligible patients (67 receiving HEC and 231 receiving MEC) were recruited from 14 oncology practices in 6 countries. Greater than 35% of patients overall experienced acute nausea, whereas 13% experienced acute emesis. Delayed nausea and emesis were observed in 60% and 50% of HEC patients, respectively, and in 52% and 28% of MEC patients, respectively. Delayed symptoms appeared without acute symptoms after HEC (emesis, 38%; nausea, 33%) and MEC (emesis, 19%; nausea, 21%). Physicians and nurses accurately predicted the incidence of acute CINV but underestimated the incidence of delayed nausea and emesis after HEC by 21 and 28 percentage points, respectively, and delayed nausea after MEC by 28 percentage points. Greater than 75% of physicians and nurses underestimated the incidence of delayed CINV after both HEC and MEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians and nurses markedly underestimated the incidence of delayed nausea and emesis after both HEC and MEC. Delayed nausea and emesis, which may appear even in the absence of acute nausea and emesis, remain important targets for improved therapeutic intervention.

Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients

BACKGROUND

A frequent complication of anticancer treatment, oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis, threatens the effectiveness of therapy because it leads to dose reductions, increases healthcare costs, and impairs patients' quality of life. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology assembled an international multidisciplinary panel of experts to create clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, evaluation, and treatment of mucositis.

METHODS

The panelists examined medical literature published from January 1966 through May 2002, presented their findings at two separate conferences, and then created a writing committee that produced two articles: the current study and another that codifies the clinical implications of the panel's findings in practice guidelines.

RESULTS

New evidence supports the view that oral mucositis is a complex process involving all the tissues and cellular elements of the mucosa. Other findings suggest that some aspects of mucositis risk may be determined genetically. GI proapoptotic and antiapoptotic gene levels change along the GI tract, perhaps explaining differences in the frequency with which mucositis occurs at different sites. Studies of mucositis incidence in clinical trials by quality and using meta-analysis techniques produced estimates of incidence that are presented herein for what to our knowledge may be a broader range of cancers than ever presented before.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the pathobiology of mucositis, its incidence, and scoring are essential for progress in research and care directed at this common side-effect of anticancer therapies.

Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced oral and gastrointestinal mucositis

BACKGROUND

Oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis can affect up to 100% of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 80% of patients with malignancies of the head and neck receiving radiotherapy, and a wide range of patients receiving chemotherapy. Alimentary track mucositis increases mortality and morbidity and contributes to rising health care costs. Consequently, the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology assembled an expert panel to evaluate the literature and to create evidence-based guidelines for preventing, evaluating, and treating mucositis.

METHODS

Thirty-six panelists reviewed literature published between January 1966 and May 2002. An initial meeting in January 2002 produced a preliminary draft of guidelines that was reviewed at a second meeting the same year. Thereafter, a writing committee produced a report on mucositis pathogenesis, epidemiology, and scoring (also included in this issue), as well as clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS

Panelists created recommendations from higher levels of evidence and suggestions when evidence was of a lower level and there was a consensus regarding the interpretation of the evidence by the panel. Panelists identified gaps in evidence that made it impossible to recommend or not recommend use of specific agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral/GI mucositis is a common side effect of many anticancer therapies. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are presented as a benchmark for clinicians to use for routine care of appropriate patients and as a springboard to challenge clinical investigators to conduct high-quality trials geared toward areas in which data are either lacking or conflicting.

Palonosetron: a unique 5-HT3 receptor antagonist indicated for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Despite the advance in supportive care that occurred with the introduction of selective serotonin subtype 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists, control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with first-generation agents (ondansetron, dolasetron, and granisetron) is less than ideal. Palonosetron is a unique 5-HT3 receptor antagonist whose distinctive pharmacologic characteristics (ie, high 5-HT3 receptor binding affinity, prolonged half-life) result in superior clinical benefit. Superiority of palonosetron over ondansetron and dolasetron in the prevention of both acute and delayed CINV has been observed in each phase III trial conducted. Of note, such evidence of superiority has never been seen in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) registration trials of other approved agents in this class. Recently approved by the FDA, palonosetron 0.25 mg intravenously is indicated for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately and highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Unlike other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, palonosetron is also indicated for prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Palonosetron exhibits an excellent tolerability profile, with frequency, severity, and duration of adverse reactions similar to that of comparator agents. Unlike older agents that are considered therapeutically interchangeable at equipotent doses, palonosetron should be considered a clinically distinct and superior treatment for the prevention of CINV.

Evidence-based guidelines for managing mucositis

OBJECTIVES

To discuss implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for mucositis.

DATA SOURCE

Published articles, book chapters, web sources, clinical experience, unpublished manuscripts.

CONCLUSION

Nurses can implement evidence-based guidelines but must include an evaluation component to determine effect on clinical outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses have an integral role implementing and evaluating evidence-based practice guidelines for managing mucositis. When evidence is lacking and guidelines have gaps, nurses can play important roles in research to overcome these gaps.

The burdens of cancer therapy. Clinical and economic outcomes of chemotherapy-induced mucositis

BACKGROUND

Mucositis is a common but poorly studied problem among patients with solid tumors. The authors examined the clinical and economic outcomes of oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis among patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective, random sample of 599 patients who developed chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression was followed for development of oral or GI mucositis and for development of subsequent episodes of bleeding or infection. Multilevel regression models of the risk of bleeding and infection were fit with chemotherapy cycles nested within patients.

RESULTS

Mucositis developed during 37% of 1236 cycles of chemotherapy. Episodes of bleeding were significantly more common during cycles with GI mucositis than during cycles without GI mucositis (13% vs. 8%; P = 0.04). Episodes of infection were significantly more common during cycles with mucositis (especially GI mucositis) than during cycles without mucositis (73% vs. 36%; P < 0.0001). The mean durations of hospitalization were 4 days, 6 days, and 12 days during cycles with no mucositis, oral mucositis, and GI mucositis, respectively. After accounting for the depth and duration of myelosuppression and for other predictive factors, GI mucositis was associated with both bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; P = 0.01) and infection (OR, 2.24; P < 0.0001), whereas oral mucositis was associated with infection only (OR, 2.4; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucositis was clinically and economically significant among patients with solid tumors who were receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. New preventive and therapeutic agents are needed.

Measuring chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis (CINE) is one of the most dreaded side effects of cancer therapy. To investigate the influence of these symptoms on a patient's quality of life (QOL), a validated tool measuring many domains is needed.

METHODS

A QOL questionnaire consisting of scales from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, the Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis, the Osoba Nausea and Emesis Module, and new items specific to nausea, emesis, and retching was constructed and administered daily for 7-9 days to outpatients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Test-retest and internal consistency reliabilities ranged from 0.44 to 0.84 and from 0.59 to 0.85, respectively. Item and scale correlations indicated good convergent and discriminant validity. Scales and items measuring similar factors (e.g., severity of emesis and severity of nausea) had strong correlations than did scales measuring dissimilar factors (e.g., cognitive functioning and physical functioning). The validity of known groups was demonstrated by significant differences (P < 0.01) in patients' QOL scores between days with no episodes of nausea, emesis, or retching, days with 1 or 2 episodes, and days with more than 3 episodes. Patients' QOL significantly decreased as the number of episodes per day increased (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A CINE QOL questionnaire that successfully measures the short-term impact of nausea, emesis, and retching on patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy has been developed, largely as a battery of preexisting questionnaires. The psychometric properties of the new questionnaire show adequate reliability and validity to warrant its use in clinical trials and outcomes studies. CINE adversely affects many domains within a patient's QOL.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of oprelvekin (recombinant human interleukin-11) for secondary prophylaxis of thrombocytopenia in solid tumor patients receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown oprelvekin (recombinant human interleukin-11 [rhIL-11]) to be effective in reducing the requirements for platelet transfusions after myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients who have previously experienced thrombocytopenia. The economic consequences of the routine use of this platelet growth factor and the usual standard of platelet transfusions for prophylaxis of severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia have not been compared.

METHODS

The authors constructed a decision-analytic model to compare the alternatives of rhIL-11 versus usual care using probability, outcome, and cost data from previously published clinical trials and their own institutional sources. They incorporated the costs of platelet transfusions and adverse events from rhIL-11 into the analysis. Quality-of-life outcomes were not considered. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was based on the criterion of cost minimization from the payer's perspective.

RESULTS

The expected cost of the usual care strategy for prophylaxis of severe thrombocytopenia (transfusion when platelets < 20000 microL(-1)) was US dollars 3495 for a 3-week cycle of chemotherapy. The prophylactic rhIL-11 strategy was more expensive, with an expected cost of US dollars 5328 over the same time period. Nonetheless, it was associated with fewer platelet transfusions, avoiding an average of 6.7 U compared with usual care. The savings from avoidance of platelet transfusion and adverse reactions to transfusion from the use of rhIL-11 were not offset by the substantial cost of the pharmaceutical. The greater expected costs from the rhIL-11 strategy were relatively insensitive to the unit price and efficacy of rhIL-11 and the costs of platelet transfusions and monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

From the payer's perspective, rhIL-11 cannot be considered a cost-saving clinical strategy compared with routine platelet transfusions for patients with severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

Patient preferences regarding side effects of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: do they change over time?

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this study were to: (1) systematically evaluate patient preferences regarding side effects of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support for treatment of advanced ovarian cancer; and (2) assess whether patients' preferences changed over time.

METHODS

Forty patients with stage III or IV disease were enrolled in this study. Patients' preferences regarding 12 health states (side effects) were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) methods during mobilization chemotherapy (T(1)) and 6-7 weeks later after high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplant (T(2)). Each assessment involved a 45-min interview conducted at the patient's bedside.

RESULTS

The three most preferred health states were no evidence of disease (NED), a chemotherapy with few or no side effects, and alopecia, while the least preferred health states were chemotherapy with multiple severe side effects, hepatotoxicity, and nausea and vomiting. These results were observed at both T(1) and T(2) using both preference assessment methods. Pancytopenia scores significantly increased from T(1) to T(2) using the VAS method (P < 0.05), but decreased using the TTO method.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy-experienced women with ovarian cancer have consistent preferences for the best and worst health states associated with the side effects of chemotherapy. Patients are more averse to nausea and vomiting than many other symptoms. Women's perceptions of pancytopenia may be dependent upon the number of prior cycles of chemotherapy and site of care for anemia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia.

The Bleeding Risk Index: a clinical prediction rule to guide the prophylactic use of platelet transfusions in patients with lymphoma or solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The correlation between platelet count and bleeding has been well described, although no formal methods for applying this information to clinical decisions are available. The authors developed a clinical prediction rule to guide the prophylactic use of platelet transfusions among patients with lymphoma or solid tumors.

METHODS

The Bleeding Risk Index (BRI) was developed from logistic regression analysis of a randomly selected 750-chemotherapy cycle derivation set using data from Day 1 of cycles. The sensitivity and specificity of a BRI-based prophylaxis strategy were compared in a 512-cycle validation set with two strategies based on initiation of prophylaxis when platelet counts fell below thresholds of 20,000 per microL or 10,000 per microL.

RESULTS

Factors that were predictive of bleeding included any prior episode of bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 5.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.2-14.0), treatment with a drug affecting platelet function (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.0-12.6), bone marrow metastases (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.7-10.8), a baseline platelet count < 75,000 per microL (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-8.9), genitourinary or gynecologic malignancy (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3-8.2), a Zubrod performance status score > 2 (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4-8.5), and treatment with agents that were highly toxic to the bone marrow (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.0-5.4). Compared with 20,000 and 10,000 platelet threshold strategies, the BRI-based strategy provided the best trade-off between sensitivity for major bleeding episodes (80%) and specificity for any bleeding (84%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lymphoma or solid tumors who are at high risk of bleeding can be identified reliably on Day 1 of a chemotherapy cycle. An individualized, BRI-based approach to bleeding prophylaxis provides a highly sensitive and specific alternative to traditional, nonindividualized platelet threshold strategies.

Incidence, cost, and outcomes of bleeding and chemotherapy dose modification among solid tumor patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

To describe the incidence and outcomes of bleeding and chemotherapy dose modifications associated with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50,000/microL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six hundred nine patients with solid tumors or lymphoma were followed-up during 1,262 chemotherapy cycles complicated by thrombocytopenia for development of bleeding, delay or dose reduction of the subsequent cycle, survival, and resource utilization. The association between survival and bleeding or dose modification was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Predisposing factors were identified by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Bleeding occurred during 9% of cycles among patients with previous bleeding episodes (P <.0001), baseline platelets less than 75,000/microL (P <.0001), bone marrow metastases (P =.001), poor performance status (P =.03), and cisplatin, carboplatin, carmustine or lomustine administration (P =.0002). Major bleeding episodes resulted in shorter survival and higher resource utilization (P <.0001). Chemotherapy delays occurred during 6% of cycles among patients with more than five previous cycles (P =.003), radiotherapy (P =.03), and disseminated disease (P =.04). They experienced similar clinical outcomes but used significantly more resources. Dose reductions occurred during 15% of cycles but were not associated with poor clinical outcomes or excess resource utilization. Significantly shorter survival and higher resource utilization were observed among the 20% of patients who failed to achieve an adequate response to platelet transfusion.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of bleeding is low among solid tumor patients overall but exceeds 20% in some subgroups. These subgroups are easily identifiable using routinely available clinical information. A clinical prediction rule is being developed. Poor response to platelet transfusion is a clinically and financially significant downstream effect of thrombocytopenia and warrants further investigation.

Identifying risk factors for imminent death in cancer patients with acute dyspnea

A substantial proportion of cancer patients presenting to an emergency center (EC) or clinic with acute dyspnea survives fewer than 2 weeks. If these patients could be identified at the time of admission, physicians and patients would have additional information on which to base decisions to continue therapy to extend life or to refocus treatment efforts on palliation and/or hospice care alone. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for imminent death (survival </= 2 weeks) and short-term survival (1, 3, or 6 months) in cancer patients presenting to an EC with acute dyspnea and to combine these factors into a model to help clinicians identify patients with short life expectancies. A random sample of 122 patients presenting to an EC with acute dyspnea was selected for a retrospective analysis. Data that were available to physicians during the initial EC visit included patient histories, triage and discharge vital signs, chest radiographs, and laboratory results. These variables were used in univariate and logistic regression models to develop predictive models for imminent death and short-term survival. Variables and interactions meeting a univariate criterion of P < 0.10 were included in stepwise regression by using forward and backward stepping. Models were compared with the use of Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and receiver operating characteristics curves. Underlying cancers were 30% breast, 37% lung, and 34% other cancers. Triage respiration greater than 28/min., triage pulse greater than or equal to 110 bpm, uncontrolled progressive disease, and history of metastasis were found to be statistically significant predictors (alpha </= 0.05) of imminent death. Patients with uncontrolled progressive disease had a relative risk of imminent death of 21.93. Relative risks for triage respiration, pulse, and metastases were 12.72, 4.92, and 3.85, respectively. Cancer diagnosis was not predictive of imminent death but was predictive when longer time periods were modeled. It may be possible to identify patients whose death is imminent from a group of cancer patients with acute dyspnea. Some factors that predict imminent death (triage pulse and respiration) differ from those (cancer diagnosis) that predict short-term survival. Extent of disease/response to treatment is common to all models. These factors need further examination and validation. If these findings are confirmed, this quantified information can help physicians in making difficult end-of-life decisions.

Time to clinical response: an outcome of antibiotic therapy of febrile neutropenia with implications for quality and cost of care

PURPOSE

To determine whether antibiotic regimens with similar rates of response differ significantly in the speed of response and to estimate the impact of this difference on the cost of febrile neutropenia.

METHODS

The time point of clinical response was defined by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of alternative objective and subjective definitions. Data from 488 episodes of febrile neutropenia, treated with either of two commonly used antibiotics (coded A or B) during six clinical trials, were pooled to compare the median time to clinical response, days of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization, and estimated costs.

RESULTS

Response rates were similar; however, the median time to clinical response was significantly shorter with A-based regimens (5 days) compared with B-based regimens (7 days; P =.003). After 72 hours of therapy, 33% of patients who received A but only 18% of those who received B had responded (P =.01). These differences resulted in fewer days of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization with A-based regimens (7 and 9 days) compared with B-based regimens (9 and 12 days, respectively; P <.04) and in significantly lower estimated median costs ($8,491 v $11,133 per episode; P =.03). Early discharge at the time of clinical response should reduce the median cost from $10,752 to $8,162 (P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite virtually identical rates of response, time to clinical response and estimated cost of care varied significantly among regimens. An early discharge strategy based on our definition of the time point of clinical response may further reduce the cost of treating non-low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia.

Colony stimulating factors in patients with fever and neutropenia

Colony stimulating factors (CSFs), are essential for the regulation of the hematopoietic system and were developed by the pharmaceutical biotechnology industry in the early 1990s for the prevention of serious neutropenic complication after myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Both G-CSF and GM-CSF consistently lead to an increase in circulating white blood cells and a reduction in the incidence of fever and neutropenia after myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, and those undergoing stem-cell transplantation. Their role in improving response rates to chemotherapy and overall survival is less clear.

The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients

PURPOSE

Febrile neutropenia remains a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy, but some patients are at low risk for serious medical complications. The purpose of this study was to develop an internationally validated scoring system to identify these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Febrile neutropenic cancer patients were observed in a prospective multinational study. Independent factors assessable at fever onset, predicting low risk of complications, on a randomly selected derivation set, were assigned integer weights to develop a risk-index score, which was subsequently tested on a validation set.

RESULTS

On the derivation set (756 patients), predictive factors were a burden of illness indicating absence of symptoms or mild symptoms (weight, 5; odds ratio [OR], 8.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.15 to 16.38) or moderate symptoms (weight, 3; OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 2.18 to 6.29); absence of hypotension (weight, 5; OR, 7.62; 95% CI, 2.91 to 19.89); absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (weight, 4; OR, 5. 35; 95% CI, 1.86 to 15.46); presence of solid tumor or absence of previous fungal infection in patients with hematologic malignancies (weight, 4; OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.97 to 12.95); outpatient status (weight, 3; OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.02 to 6.04); absence of dehydration (weight, 3; OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.89 to 7.73); and age less than 60 years (weight, 2; OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.51 to 4.01). On the validation set, a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk-index score >/= 21 identified low-risk patients with a positive predictive value of 91%, specificity of 68%, and sensitivity of 71%.

CONCLUSION

The risk index accurately identifies patients at low risk for complications and may be used to select patients for testing therapeutic strategies that may be more convenient or cost-effective.

Influence of data display formats on physician investigators' decisions to stop clinical trials: prospective trial with repeated measures

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of the method of data display on physician investigators' decisions to stop hypothetical clinical trials for an unplanned statistical analysis.

DESIGN

Prospective, mixed model design with variables between subjects and within subjects (repeated measures).

SETTING

Comprehensive cancer centre.

PARTICIPANTS

34 physicians, stratified by academic rank, who were conducting clinical trials.

INTERVENTIONS

PARTICIPANTS were shown tables, pie charts, bar graphs, and icon displays containing hypothetical data from a clinical trial and were asked to decide whether to continue the trial or stop for an unplanned statistical analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Percentage of accurate decisions with each type of display.

RESULTS

Accuracy of decisions was affected by the type of data display and positive or negative framing of the data. More correct decisions were made with icon displays than with tables, pie charts, and bar graphs (82% v 68%, 56%, and 43%, respectively; P=0.03) and when data were negatively framed rather than positively framed in tables (93% v 47%; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical investigators' decisions can be affected by factors unrelated to the actual data. In the design of clinical trials information systems, careful consideration should be given to the method by which data are framed and displayed in order to reduce the impact of these extraneous factors.

Mississippi mud in the 1990s: risks and outcomes of vancomycin-associated toxicity in general oncology practice

BACKGROUND

Discrepancies between the severity of toxicities reported in early clinical trials and recent clinical experience with vancomycin have led to confusion regarding the need for routine serum vancomycin level monitoring and discontinuation of vancomycin when toxicities occur. Therefore, the authors examined the incidence, outcomes, and predictive factors of vancomycin-associated toxicities in general oncology practice with the goal of developing clinically relevant prediction rules and guidelines.

METHODS

All 742 consecutive cancer patients who received vancomycin at a comprehensive cancer center during a 3-month period were followed prospectively for the development and outcome of phlebitis, rash, ototoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. Logistic regression was used to derive a multiple variable model of the risk of nephrotoxicity. A clinical prediction rule, the Nephrotoxicity Risk Score, was developed from the risk model and validated prospectively.

RESULTS

Phlebitis occurred in 3% of patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2-4%), predominantly those with recently inserted central venous catheters. Rashes occurred in 11% of patients (95% CI, 9-13%); however, all but 4 patients also were receiving beta-lactam antibiotics. Clinical evidence of ototoxicity developed in 6% of patients (95% CI, 4-9%) who were receiving vancomycin plus other ototoxic agents and only 3% of patients (95% CI, 2-5%) not receiving other ototoxic agents (P = 0.08). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 17% of patients (95% CI, 15-20%). Logistic regression revealed that factors associated with an increased risk of nephrotoxicity included administration of other mild to moderate (P = 0.01) or severely nephrotoxic agents (P < 0.001) or an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) score > 40 (P = 0.002). Elevated serum vancomycin peak levels did not reliably predict subsequent nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin-associated toxicities usually are mild and self-limiting. Some patients are at a significantly higher risk of nephrotoxicity but the authors believe these individuals can be identified reliably with the Nephrotoxicity Risk Index using information available at vancomycin initiation. Further testing of the Nephrotoxicity Risk Index is ongoing.

Incorporating new modalities into practice guidelines: platelet growth factors

The outcomes of thrombocytopenia are clinically serious (hemorrhage), costly to prevent and treat (platelet transfusions and hospitalization), and may result in delay of the subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. Oprelvekin, the first commercially available platelet growth factor, has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing the need for platelet transfusions. In placebo-controlled trials of patients with solid tumors receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy, 68% of oprelvekin recipients escaped transfusion altogether, compared with only 41% of those who received a placebo. Side effects are generally mild, reversible, and related to fluid retention. Although clinical trials provide evidence about how many patients, on average, can be expected to benefit from agents such as oprelvekin, the trials provide little information about which patients in the general oncology population will benefit. Guidelines based on clinical trial data are limited by this approach. An alternative approach is to develop a clinical profile or model of patients at high risk of developing serious clinical outcomes and target platelet growth factors to these patients through the use of guidelines. Other important components of the guideline development process include a thorough evaluation of the costs of treatments and side effects as well as a careful evaluation of patient's preferences for alternative treatment strategies. Guidelines limiting growth factor use to only those patients who are most likely to benefit provide an opportunity to use expensive new agents in a cost-effective, evidence-based fashion.

Costs of blood transfusion: a process-flow analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the cost of transfusing 2 units (U) of packed RBCs at a comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS

We performed a process-flow analysis to identify all costs of transfusing 2 U of allogeneic packed RBCs on an outpatient basis to patients with either (1) solid tumor who did not undergo bone marrow transplantation (BMT), (2) solid tumor who underwent BMT, (3) hematologic malignancy who did not undergo BMT, (4) hematologic malignancy who underwent allogeneic BMT, or (5) hematologic malignancy who underwent autologous BMT. We conducted structured interviews to determine the personnel time used and physical resources necessary at all steps of the transfusion process.

RESULTS

The mean cost of a 2-U transfusion of allogeneic packed RBCs was $548, $565, $569, $569, and $566 for patients with non-BMT solid tumor, BMT solid tumor, non-BMT hematologic malignancy, allogeneic BMT hematologic malignancy, and autologous BMT hematologic malignancy, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that total transfusion costs were sensitive to variations in the amount of clinician compensation and overhead costs, but were relatively insensitive to reasonable variations in the direct costs of blood tests and the blood itself, or the probability or extent of transfusion reaction.

CONCLUSION

The costs of the transfusion of packed RBCs are greater than previously analyzed, particularly in the cancer care setting.

Evaluating cost-effectiveness in outpatient management of medical complications in cancer patients

It has been estimated that 85% to 90% of all cancer patient care occurs in the outpatient setting, and the vast majority of chemotherapy is administered in the outpatient setting either in physician offices or hospital clinics. With the introduction of white blood cell growth factors in the early 1990s, dose-intensive regimens either for curative or palliative therapy became more common. Since that time, major dose-limiting toxicities have become gastrointestinal mucositis and chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. Patient-reported symptoms have also become important as the changing financing and reimbursement for health care shifts the focus to a patient-centered, value-oriented approach in hematology and medical oncology. This paper will examine advances in the management of three common complications of antineoplastic therapy, mucositis, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue, with a particular emphasis on cost-effectiveness as it relates to value in health care.

Ambulatory management of varicella-zoster virus infection in immunocompromised cancer patients

Immunocompromised patients with varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection are at greater risk for dissemination and the development of complications than immunocompetent individuals. Consequently, they are generally hospitalized in strict isolation rooms and treated with parenterally administered acyclovir. Although effective, this approach is expensive and creates logistic difficulties in the hospital. We treated 38 immunosuppressed cancer patients presenting to our ambulatory treatment center with VZV infections with intravenous acyclovir (500 mg/m2 8-hourly) in an ambulatory/home setting. Patients were monitored for success or failure of therapy, progression of infection, development of complications or drug toxicity, and satisfaction/compliance with therapy. Most patients (33, or 87%) responded to therapy. Among the failures, 2 patients had progressive VZV infection, 2 were hospitalized due to renal toxicity, and 1 developed a superinfection. All patients eventually responded and there were no deaths on this study. Two patients relapsed within 1 month of initial response. Both responded to retreatment with acyclovir, without hospitalization. The median duration of parenteral therapy with acyclovir was 7.5 days. Seven patients (18%) had to be switched to oral acyclovir (800 mg, 5 times a day) before complete response, owing to problems with venous access. All 7 completed therapy successfully. Overall, patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with outpatient therapy, and there were no instances of noncompliance or patient requests for withdrawal from study. The results of this study indicate that VZV infections in clinically stable immunosuppressed cancer patients are relatively benign and do not require hospitalization. Parenterally administered acyclovir in an ambulatory setting is effective therapy for such infections.

Controversies in new antibiotic therapy for ambulatory patients

The care of the febrile neutropenic patient has undergone a shift in the last 10 years with the realization that neutropenic patients presenting with fever do not constitute a homogeneous group. Strategies of risk assessment have allowed the testing of novel therapies including outpatient treatment with oral and intravenous antibiotics, either in combination regimens or as monotherapy; the addition of growth factors to hasten the return of the absolute neutrophil count; and the possibility of self-initiation of antibiotics by cancer patients when they develop fever. The clinical trials data regarding these new approaches will be reviewed, and areas requiring further research will be discussed.

Outcomes of bacteremia in patients with cancer and neutropenia: observations from two decades of epidemiological and clinical trials

The prognostic significance of major organ and tissue infection was examined in 909 episodes of bacteremia that were selected from 10 consecutive, randomized clinical trials of antibiotic therapy for infection in patients with cancer and neutropenia. Extensive tissue infection significantly compromised response to initial therapy (38% vs. 74%; P < .0001), ultimate outcome of infection (73% vs. 94%; P < .0001), median time to normalization of temperature (5.3 days vs. 2.5 days; P < .0001), and survival (P < .0001). Other poor prognostic factors revealed by logistic regression included shock (P < .0001) and bacteremia caused by Pseudomonas species (P = .03), Clostridium species (P = .006), or a pathogen resistant to antibiotics used for initial therapy (P < .0001). Recovery of the granulocyte count predicted a superior response (P < .0001). Although the overall mortality rate was not significantly increased when patients with bacteremia due to gram-negative organisms initially received monotherapy or when patients with bacteremia due to gram-positive organisms received delayed vancomycin therapy, these strategies increased the duration of therapy by 25%. Patients with bacteremia due to alpha-hemolytic streptococcus died more often when vancomycin was not included in the initial empirical regimen (P = .004). Because of the prognostic significance of extensive tissue or major organ infection, this factor should be considered in decisions concerning modification of therapy and use of colony-stimulating factors. The cost-effectiveness of initial monotherapy and delayed vancomycin therapy remains to be demonstrated.

Medical futility and appropriate medical care in patients whose death is thought to be imminent

Often it is very difficult to make decisions involving the termination of aggressive cancer care in the case of patients who are no longer benefiting. Among these patients, our ability to "do everything possible" to continue life is in conflict with "doing the right thing"; the greatest benefit to these patients derives from delivering excellent supportive care and assisting them in understanding and accepting end-of-life issues. Furthermore, in a cost-conscious environment with limited resources, all patients and, indeed, all of society, benefit when aggressive and often costly cancer care is limited to those patients who are likely to benefit. However, these issues are complex, blending treatment science and ethics, and thus, the physician frequently has no objective reference point on which to base the decisions. This paper integrates the principles of ethics (respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice) and three difficult issues encountered by physicians in clinical decision-making in terminal cancer patients in the American healthcare system. These issues include: medical futility and appropriate care, applications of outcomes research in clinical decision-making, and impact of cost, particularly in a managed care environment, on treatment choice. These topics are illustrated with reference to patients presenting to our emergency center with stage IV lung cancer and dyspnea, and the application of an outcomes model under development to predict imminent death in these patients is discussed. Outcomes models may provide patients, their families, and their physicians with objective data on which to base end-of-life decision-making. Minimizing aggressive treatment of terminally ill patients may provide better life quality and will reduce costs during the patients' end of life. Ethics plays a crucial role in integrating medical science, patient choice, and cost in making appropriate decisions.

Randomized, double blind, dose-response trial across four oral doses of dolasetron for the prevention of acute emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Oral Dolasetron Dose-Response Study Group

BACKGROUND

This double blind parallel group study assessed the acute antiemetic efficacy of four oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in cancer patients receiving their first course of intravenous chemotherapy with doxorubicin and/or cyclophosphamide.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg of dolasetron mesylate 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy and were monitored for nausea and emetic episodes for the next 24 hours.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nineteen cancer patients at 32 sites completed the study. Most patients were female (81%); of this group, 69% had breast carcinoma. A highly statistically significant linear trend demonstrating improved response with higher doses was detected for complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), for complete plus major response (0-2 emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), and for patient visual analog scale assessments of nausea (P = 0.001) and general satisfaction with antiemetic therapy (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events were noted. The most frequent adverse event was mild, self-limiting headache, which has been reported with other drugs in this class.

CONCLUSIONS

Single oral doses of dolasetron mesylate were found to be effective in preventing acute emesis in cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer

Until recently, febrile neutropenic patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics in inpatient settings. Because of work completed in the last several years by various investigators, identification of a low-risk group of febrile, neutropenic patients has allowed successful treatment with both parenteral and oral antibiotics in an ambulatory environment. This accomplishment has been facilitated by advances in broad-spectrum antibiotics with long half-lives and stabilities, the introduction of the quinolones providing oral antipseudomonal activity, home health care, improvements in vascular access devices, and technically enhanced antibiotic delivery systems. This review focuses on the rationale of risk stratification and the progress made in treating low-risk febrile neutropenic patients as outpatients.

Dyspnea in cancer patients. Etiology, resource utilization, and survival-implications in a managed care world

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is the fourth most common symptom of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and may, in some patients with advanced cancer, represent a clinical marker for the terminal phase of their disease. This retrospective study describes the clinical characteristics of these patients, the resource utilization associated with the management of dyspnea, and the survival of patients with this symptom.

METHODS

The authors randomly selected 122 of 1068 patients presenting with dyspnea for a retrospective analysis. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 23-90 years) and 53% were female. Underlying malignancies were breast cancer (30%), lung cancer (37%), and other cancers (34%). Approximately 94% of the patients had received prior cancer treatment and the majority (69%) had uncontrolled, progressive disease.

RESULTS

The most common treatments administered in the ED were oxygen (31%), beta-2 agonists (14%), antibiotics (12%), and narcotics (11%). Approximately 60% of patients were admitted to the hospital from the ED for further treatment of dyspnea and the underlying malignancy, and the median length of stay was 9 days. The median overall survival after the ED visit for dyspnea was 12 weeks. Specific diagnoses were associated with different median survival rates: lung cancer patients: 4 weeks; breast cancer patients: 22 weeks (P = 0.0073, vs. lung cancer); and other cancer diagnoses: 27 weeks (P = 0.0027, vs. lung cancer).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea have much shorter survival than patients with other malignancies. For some patients, the presence of dyspnea requiring emergency treatment may indicate a phase in their illness in which resources should be shifted from acute intervention with hospitalization to palliative and supportive care measures.

Dyspnea in cancer patients. Etiology, resource utilization, and survival-implications in a managed care world

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is the fourth most common symptom of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and may, in some patients with advanced cancer, represent a clinical marker for the terminal phase of their disease. This retrospective study describes the clinical characteristics of these patients, the resource utilization associated with the management of dyspnea, and the survival of patients with this symptom.

METHODS

The authors randomly selected 122 of 1068 patients presenting with dyspnea for a retrospective analysis. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 23-90 years) and 53% were female. Underlying malignancies were breast cancer (30%), lung cancer (37%), and other cancers (34%). Approximately 94% of the patients had received prior cancer treatment and the majority (69%) had uncontrolled, progressive disease.

RESULTS

The most common treatments administered in the ED were oxygen (31%), beta-2 agonists (14%), antibiotics (12%), and narcotics (11%). Approximately 60% of patients were admitted to the hospital from the ED for further treatment of dyspnea and the underlying malignancy, and the median length of stay was 9 days. The median overall survival after the ED visit for dyspnea was 12 weeks. Specific diagnoses were associated with different median survival rates: lung cancer patients: 4 weeks; breast cancer patients: 22 weeks (P = 0.0073, vs. lung cancer); and other cancer diagnoses: 27 weeks (P = 0.0027, vs. lung cancer).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea have much shorter survival than patients with other malignancies. For some patients, the presence of dyspnea requiring emergency treatment may indicate a phase in their illness in which resources should be shifted from acute intervention with hospitalization to palliative and supportive care measures.

Outpatient antibiotic treatment in low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients

Traditionally febrile neutropenic patients have been treated with parenteral antibiotics in an inpatient setting; however, recent work by several investigators has demonstrated successful treatment with both parenteral and oral antibiotics in an ambulatory environment. This has been accomplished by identification of low-risk neutropenic patients, advances in broad-spectrum antibiotics with long half-lives and stabilities, the introduction of the oral quinolones, home health-care initiatives, improvements in vascular access devices, and development of technically enhanced antibiotic delivery systems. Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients should now be considered an acceptable alternative to hospital-based treatment. This review focuses on the development and rationale of risk stratification and examines the results of various outpatient antibiotic trials recently completed.

Early empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile neutropenia patients at low risk

Although it is apparent that certain patients with febrile neutropenic episodes can benefit from outpatient antibiotic therapy, not all low-risk patients are treated in this fashion. There are barriers, real and perceived, to implementing this approach for patients, health care providers, and caregivers. Table 3 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of ambulatory management of febrile neutropenic patients. For many patients and physicians, outpatient oral antibiotics may be preferred, whereas for others a more conservative approach might be needed in order to feel comfortable with treating this population on an outpatient basis. In this situation, patients can be treated in a stepwise fashion as shown in Table 4. These alternatives allow physicians and patients options to discuss when planning treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia.

Nature and outcome of febrile episodes in patients with pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancer

Fifty febrile episodes in patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer were reviewed. Biliary obstruction often resulting in cholangitis was an important predisposing factor, whereas neutropenia (< 500 PMN/mm3) was uncommon (10%). Microbiologically documented infections originating from the gastrointestinal tract were predominant, with Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli being isolated most often. Non-infectious causes of fever occurred in 16% of patients. Only one patient developed a fungal infection. The overall response rate to therapy was 94%, with 32% being eligible for outpatient management. These data are quite different from those generated from patients with hematologic malignancies and indicate that disease-site specific management guidelines need to be developed for febrile episodes in patients with various underlying neoplasms.

Vascular access by physician assistants: evaluation of an implantable peripheral port system in cancer patients

PURPOSE

To determine the ability of a physician assistant (PA) to insert, in an ambulatory setting, a peripheral subcutaneous implanted vascular-access device (VAD) and to evaluate the ability to transfer this training to a second PA. We also evaluated the performance and complications associated with this new device.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Peripheral Access System (PAS) Port catheter system (Sims-Deltec Inc, St Paul, MN) was inserted in patients who required long-term (> 3 months) vascular access for infusion therapy.

RESULTS

The first PA (PA-1) successfully inserted 57 of 62 devices (92%) after gaining experience with the technique in 10 patients (success rate, five of 10 [50%]; P = .003). The second PA (PA-2) was successful in eight of 10 initial attempts (80%) and 25 of 30 overall (83%). Complications were few and limited to phlebitis, thrombosis, and a low infection rate (0.2 per 1,000 catheter days).

CONCLUSION

PAs can be taught to insert a peripheral subcutaneous implanted VAD. This technique is transferable from one PA to another, and the device studied is appropriate for outpatient VAD programs.

Outpatient management of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients

Febrile neutropenic patients have traditionally received hospital-based parenteral antibiotic therapy because of the risk of serious complications and associated mortality. Recently a low-risk subset among febrile neutropenic patients has been identified. Several alternatives to hospital-based therapy have been evaluated in such patients. These include early discharge to home antibiotic therapy after initial stabilization in the hospital, or treatment of the entire febrile episode with intravenous and/or oral antibiotics in an ambulatory setting. A multidisciplinary approach involving the physician and other health-care providers, the patients, and their families, ensures the success of this therapeutic modality. Careful patient selection, daily follow-up, close monitoring for the development of complications and/or adverse reactions, and informed consent along with detailed instructions to patients, minimize the risk of the development of serious complications. Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients should now be considered an acceptable alternative to hospital-based therapy.

Costs and benefits of outpatient therapy

In recent years, much of the care traditionally rendered in hospitals has been shifted to ambulatory settings. This change has been fueled as much by changing patterns of reimbursement as by rapid developments in medicine and technology. The current climate of health-care reform suggests that this trend will continue for the near future. Unfortunately, there are few studies that systematically evaluate the cost effectiveness or benefits of ambulatory care. Among the few such studies published to date, the results are not overwhelmingly positive. While the monetary costs of ambulatory care are generally far lower than inpatient management, several studies suggest that family and household disruption are prominent features of outpatient strategies. Thus, the measurement of the direct and indirect costs and benefits of ambulatory treatment presents a significant challenge to researchers. Development of methodologies to support such studies must be among our highest priorities.