1
|
Steel A, Silson EH, Garcia BD, Robertson CE. A retinotopic code structures the interaction between perception and memory systems. Nat Neurosci 2024; 27:339-347. [PMID: 38168931 PMCID: PMC10923171 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-023-01512-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Conventional views of brain organization suggest that regions at the top of the cortical hierarchy processes internally oriented information using an abstract amodal neural code. Despite this, recent reports have described the presence of retinotopic coding at the cortical apex, including the default mode network. What is the functional role of retinotopic coding atop the cortical hierarchy? Here we report that retinotopic coding structures interactions between internally oriented (mnemonic) and externally oriented (perceptual) brain areas. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we observed robust inverted (negative) retinotopic coding in category-selective memory areas at the cortical apex, which is functionally linked to the classic (positive) retinotopic coding in category-selective perceptual areas in high-level visual cortex. These functionally linked retinotopic populations in mnemonic and perceptual areas exhibit spatially specific opponent responses during both bottom-up perception and top-down recall, suggesting that these areas are interlocked in a mutually inhibitory dynamic. These results show that retinotopic coding structures interactions between perceptual and mnemonic neural systems, providing a scaffold for their dynamic interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Steel
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
| | - Edward H Silson
- Psychosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Brenda D Garcia
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Caroline E Robertson
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steel A, Silson EH, Garcia BD, Robertson CE. A retinotopic code structures the interaction between perception and memory systems. bioRxiv 2023:2023.05.15.540807. [PMID: 37292758 PMCID: PMC10245578 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.15.540807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Conventional views of brain organization suggest that the cortical apex processes internally-oriented information using an abstract, amodal neural code. Yet, recent reports have described the presence of retinotopic coding at the cortical apex, including the default mode network. What is the functional role of retinotopic coding atop the cortical hierarchy? Here, we report that retinotopic coding structures interactions between internally-oriented (mnemonic) and externally-oriented (perceptual) brain areas. Using fMRI, we observed robust, inverted (negative) retinotopic coding in category-selective memory areas at the cortical apex, which is functionally linked to the classic (positive) retinotopic coding in category-selective perceptual areas in high-level visual cortex. Specifically, these functionally-linked retinotopic populations in mnemonic and perceptual areas exhibit spatially-specific opponent responses during both bottom-up perception and top-down recall, suggesting that these areas are interlocked in a mutually-inhibitory dynamic. Together, these results show that retinotopic coding structures interactions between perceptual and mnemonic neural systems, thereby scaffolding their dynamic interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Steel
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755
| | - Edward H. Silson
- Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK EH8 9JZ
| | - Brenda D. Garcia
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Silson EH, Baker CI, Aleman TS, Maguire AM, Bennett J, Ashtari M. Motion-selective areas V5/MT and MST appear resistant to deterioration in choroideremia. Neuroimage Clin 2023; 38:103384. [PMID: 37023490 PMCID: PMC10119684 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Choroideremia (CHM) is an X-linked recessive form of hereditary retinal degeneration, which preserves only small islands of central retinal tissue. Previously, we demonstrated the relationship between central vision and structure and population receptive fields (pRF) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in untreated CHM subjects. Here, we replicate and extend this work, providing a more in-depth analysis of the visual responses in a cohort of CHM subjects who participated in a retinal gene therapy clinical trial. fMRI was conducted in six CHM subjects and six age-matched healthy controls (HC's) while they viewed drifting contrast pattern stimuli monocularly. A single ∼3-minute fMRI run was collected for each eye. Participants also underwent ophthalmic evaluations of visual acuity and static automatic perimetry (SAP). Consistent with our previous report, a single ∼ 3 min fMRI run accurately characterized ophthalmic evaluations of visual function in most CHM subjects. In-depth analyses of the cortical distribution of pRF responses revealed that the motion-selective regions V5/MT and MST appear resistant to progressive retinal degenerations in CHM subjects. This effect was restricted to V5/MT and MST and was not present in either primary visual cortex (V1), motion-selective V3A or regions within the ventral visual pathway. Motion-selective areas V5/MT and MST appear to be resistant to the continuous detrimental impact of CHM. Such resilience appears selective to these areas and may be mediated by independent retina-V5/MT anatomical connections that bypass V1. We did not observe any significant impact of gene therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward H Silson
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Chris I Baker
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Tomas S Aleman
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Albert M Maguire
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jean Bennett
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Manzar Ashtari
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schintu S, Kravitz DJ, Silson EH, Cunningham CA, Wassermann EM, Shomstein S. Dynamic changes in spatial representation within the posterior parietal cortex in response to visuomotor adaptation. Cereb Cortex 2023; 33:3651-3663. [PMID: 35989306 PMCID: PMC10068280 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) population receptive field (pRF) mapping to demonstrate that retinotopic organization extends from the primary visual cortex to ventral and dorsal visual pathways, by quantifying visual field maps, receptive field size, and laterality throughout multiple areas. Visuospatial representation in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is modulated by attentional deployment, raising the question of whether spatial representation in the PPC is dynamic and flexible, and whether this flexibility contributes to visuospatial learning. To answer this question, changes in spatial representation within the PPC and early visual cortex were recorded with pRF mapping before and after prism adaptation (PA)-a well-established visuomotor technique that modulates visuospatial attention according to the direction of the visual displacement. As predicted, results showed that adaptation to left-shifting prisms increases pRF size in left PPC, while leaving space representation in the early visual cortex unchanged. This is the first evidence that PA drives a dynamic reorganization of response profiles in the PPC. These findings show that spatial representations in the PPC not only reflect changes driven by attentional deployment but dynamically change in response to modulation of external factors such as manipulation of the visuospatial input during visuomotor adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Schintu
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA
- Center for Mind/BrainSciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, Via Matteo del Ben, 5/B, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy
| | - D J Kravitz
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - E H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, Section on Learning and Plasticity, National Institute of Mental Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9AD, UK
| | - C A Cunningham
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - E M Wassermann
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - S Shomstein
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steel A, Garcia BD, Silson EH, Robertson CE. Evaluating the efficacy of multi-echo ICA denoising on model-based fMRI. Neuroimage 2022; 264:119723. [PMID: 36328274 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
fMRI is an indispensable tool for neuroscience investigation, but this technique is limited by multiple sources of physiological and measurement noise. These noise sources are particularly problematic for analysis techniques that require high signal-to-noise ratio for stable model fitting, such as voxel-wise modeling. Multi-echo data acquisition in combination with echo-time dependent ICA denoising (ME-ICA) represents one promising strategy to mitigate physiological and hardware-related noise sources as well as motion-related artifacts. However, most studies employing ME-ICA to date are resting-state fMRI studies, and therefore we have a limited understanding of the impact of ME-ICA on complex task or model-based fMRI paradigms. Here, we addressed this knowledge gap by comparing data quality and model fitting performance of data acquired during a visual population receptive field (pRF) mapping (N = 13 participants) experiment after applying one of three preprocessing procedures: ME-ICA, optimally combined multi-echo data without ICA-denoising, and typical single echo processing. As expected, multi-echo fMRI improved temporal signal-to-noise compared to single echo fMRI, with ME-ICA amplifying the improvement compared to optimal combination alone. However, unexpectedly, this boost in temporal signal-to-noise did not directly translate to improved model fitting performance: compared to single echo acquisition, model fitting was only improved after ICA-denoising. Specifically, compared to single echo acquisition, ME-ICA resulted in improved variance explained by our pRF model throughout the visual system, including anterior regions of the temporal and parietal lobes where SNR is typically low, while optimal combination without ICA did not. ME-ICA also improved reliability of parameter estimates compared to single echo and optimally combined multi-echo data without ICA-denoising. Collectively, these results suggest that ME-ICA is effective for denoising task-based fMRI data for modeling analyzes and maintains the integrity of the original data. Therefore, ME-ICA may be beneficial for complex fMRI experiments, including voxel-wise modeling and naturalistic paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Steel
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 3 Maynard Street, Hanover, NH 03755, US.
| | - Brenda D Garcia
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 3 Maynard Street, Hanover, NH 03755, US
| | - Edward H Silson
- Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK
| | - Caroline E Robertson
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 3 Maynard Street, Hanover, NH 03755, US
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Groen IIA, Dekker TM, Knapen T, Silson EH. Visuospatial coding as ubiquitous scaffolding for human cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2021; 26:81-96. [PMID: 34799253 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
For more than 100 years we have known that the visual field is mapped onto the surface of visual cortex, imposing an inherently spatial reference frame on visual information processing. Recent studies highlight visuospatial coding not only throughout visual cortex, but also brain areas not typically considered visual. Such widespread access to visuospatial coding raises important questions about its role in wider cognitive functioning. Here, we synthesise these recent developments and propose that visuospatial coding scaffolds human cognition by providing a reference frame through which neural computations interface with environmental statistics and task demands via perception-action loops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris I A Groen
- Institute for Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa M Dekker
- Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tomas Knapen
- Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Spinoza Centre for NeuroImaging, Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edward H Silson
- Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ling X, Silson EH, McIntosh RD. Did you see it? A Python tool for psychophysical assessment of the human blind spot. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254195. [PMID: 34735455 PMCID: PMC8568268 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The blind spot is a region in the temporal monocular visual field in humans, which corresponds to a physiological scotoma within the nasal hemi-retina. This region has no photoreceptors, so is insensitive to visual stimulation. There is no corresponding perceptual scotoma because the visual stimulation is “filled-in” by the visual system. Investigations of visual perception in and around the blind spot allow us to investigate this filling-in process. However, because the location and size of the blind spot are individually variable, experimenters must first map the blind spot in every observer. We present an open-source tool, which runs in Psychopy software, to estimate the location and size of the blind spot psychophysically. The tool will ideally be used with an Eyelink eye-tracker (SR Research), but it can also run in standalone mode. Here, we explain the rationale for the tool and demonstrate its validity in normally-sighted observers. We develop a detailed map of the blind spot in one observer. Then, in a group of 12 observers, we propose a more efficient, pragmatic method to define a “safe zone” within the blind spot, for which the experimenter can be fully confident that visual stimuli will not be seen. Links are provided to this open-source tool and a user manual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Ling
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Edward H. Silson
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Robert D. McIntosh
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boring MJ, Silson EH, Ward MJ, Richardson RM, Fiez JA, Baker CI, Ghuman AS. Multiple Adjoining Word- and Face-Selective Regions in Ventral Temporal Cortex Exhibit Distinct Dynamics. J Neurosci 2021; 41:6314-6327. [PMID: 34099511 PMCID: PMC8287994 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3234-20.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The map of category-selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex (VTC) provides organizational constraints to models of object recognition. One important principle is lateral-medial response biases to stimuli that are typically viewed in the center or periphery of the visual field. However, little is known about the relative temporal dynamics and location of regions that respond preferentially to stimulus classes that are centrally viewed, such as the face- and word-processing networks. Here, word- and face-selective regions within VTC were mapped using intracranial recordings from 36 patients. Partially overlapping, but also anatomically dissociable patches of face- and word-selectivity, were found in VTC. In addition to canonical word-selective regions along the left posterior occipitotemporal sulcus, selectivity was also located medial and anterior to face-selective regions on the fusiform gyrus at the group level and within individual male and female subjects. These regions were replicated using 7 Tesla fMRI in healthy subjects. Left hemisphere word-selective regions preceded right hemisphere responses by 125 ms, potentially reflecting the left hemisphere bias for language, with no hemispheric difference in face-selective response latency. Word-selective regions along the posterior fusiform responded first, then spread medially and laterally, then anteriorally. Face-selective responses were first seen in posterior fusiform regions bilaterally, then proceeded anteriorally from there. For both words and faces, the relative delay between regions was longer than would be predicted by purely feedforward models of visual processing. The distinct time courses of responses across these regions, and between hemispheres, suggest that a complex and dynamic functional circuit supports face and word perception.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Representations of visual objects in the human brain have been shown to be organized by several principles, including whether those objects tend to be viewed centrally or peripherally in the visual field. However, it remains unclear how regions that process objects that are viewed centrally, such as words and faces, are organized relative to one another. Here, invasive and noninvasive neuroimaging suggests that there is a mosaic of regions in ventral temporal cortex that respond selectively to either words or faces. These regions display differences in the strength and timing of their responses, both within and between brain hemispheres, suggesting that they play different roles in perception. These results illuminate extended, bilateral, and dynamic brain pathways that support face perception and reading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Boring
- Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
| | - Edward H Silson
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Magnuson Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20814
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom
| | - Michael J Ward
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02144
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - Julie A Fiez
- Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
| | - Chris I Baker
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Magnuson Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20814
| | - Avniel Singh Ghuman
- Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Steel A, Billings MM, Silson EH, Robertson CE. A network linking scene perception and spatial memory systems in posterior cerebral cortex. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2632. [PMID: 33976141 PMCID: PMC8113503 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22848-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The neural systems supporting scene-perception and spatial-memory systems of the human brain are well-described. But how do these neural systems interact? Here, using fine-grained individual-subject fMRI, we report three cortical areas of the human brain, each lying immediately anterior to a region of the scene perception network in posterior cerebral cortex, that selectively activate when recalling familiar real-world locations. Despite their close proximity to the scene-perception areas, network analyses show that these regions constitute a distinct functional network that interfaces with spatial memory systems during naturalistic scene understanding. These "place-memory areas" offer a new framework for understanding how the brain implements memory-guided visual behaviors, including navigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Steel
- grid.254880.30000 0001 2179 2404Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA
| | - Madeleine M. Billings
- grid.254880.30000 0001 2179 2404Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA
| | - Edward H. Silson
- grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ UK
| | - Caroline E. Robertson
- grid.254880.30000 0001 2179 2404Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Silson EH, Zeidman P, Knapen T, Baker CI. Representation of Contralateral Visual Space in the Human Hippocampus. J Neurosci 2021; 41:2382-2392. [PMID: 33500275 PMCID: PMC7984600 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1990-20.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The initial encoding of visual information primarily from the contralateral visual field is a fundamental organizing principle of the primate visual system. Recently, the presence of such retinotopic sensitivity has been shown to extend well beyond early visual cortex to regions not historically considered retinotopically sensitive. In particular, human scene-selective regions in parahippocampal and medial parietal cortex exhibit prominent biases for the contralateral visual field. Here, we used fMRI to test the hypothesis that the human hippocampus, which is thought to be anatomically connected with these scene-selective regions, would also exhibit a biased representation of contralateral visual space. First, population receptive field (pRF) mapping with scene stimuli revealed strong biases for the contralateral visual field in bilateral hippocampus. Second, the distribution of retinotopic sensitivity suggested a more prominent representation in anterior medial portions of the hippocampus. Finally, the contralateral bias was confirmed in independent data taken from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) initiative. The presence of contralateral biases in the hippocampus, a structure considered by many as the apex of the visual hierarchy, highlights the truly pervasive influence of retinotopy. Moreover, this finding has important implications for understanding how visual information relates to the allocentric global spatial representations known to be encoded therein.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Retinotopic encoding of visual information is an organizing principle of visual cortex. Recent work demonstrates this sensitivity in structures far beyond early visual cortex, including those anatomically connected to the hippocampus. Here, using population receptive field (pRF) modeling in two independent sets of data we demonstrate a consistent bias for the contralateral visual field in bilateral hippocampus. Such a bias highlights the truly pervasive influence of retinotopy, with important implications for understanding how the presence of retinotopy relates to more allocentric spatial representations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward H Silson
- Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20892-1366, Maryland
| | - Peter Zeidman
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom
| | - Tomas Knapen
- Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1012 WX, The Netherlands
- Spinoza Centre for NeuroImaging, Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences 1012 WX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris I Baker
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20892-1366, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Groen IIA, Silson EH, Pitcher D, Baker CI. Theta-burst TMS of lateral occipital cortex reduces BOLD responses across category-selective areas in ventral temporal cortex. Neuroimage 2021; 230:117790. [PMID: 33497776 PMCID: PMC8094793 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Human visual cortex contains three scene-selective regions in the lateral, medial and ventral cortex, termed the occipital place area (OPA), medial place area (MPA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), all three regions respond more strongly when viewing visual scenes compared with isolated objects or faces. To determine how these regions are functionally and causally connected, we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation to OPA and measured fMRI responses before and after stimulation, using a theta-burst paradigm (TBS). To test for stimulus category-selectivity, we presented a range of visual categories (scenes, buildings, objects, faces). To test for specificity of any effects to TBS of OPA we employed two control conditions: Sham, with no TBS stimulation, and an active TBS-control with TBS to a proximal face-selective cortical region (occipital face area, or OFA). We predicted that TBS to OPA (but not OFA) would lead to decreased responses to scenes and buildings (but not other categories) in other scene-selective cortical regions. Across both ROI and whole-volume analyses, we observed decreased responses to scenes in PPA as a result of TBS. However, these effects were neither category specific, with decreased responses to all stimulus categories, nor limited to scene-selective regions, with decreases also observed in face-selective fusiform face area (FFA). Furthermore, similar effects were observed with TBS to OFA, thus effects were not specific to the stimulation site in the lateral occipital cortex. Whilst these data are suggestive of a causal, but non-specific relationship between lateral occipital and ventral temporal cortex, we discuss several factors that could have underpinned this result, such as the differences between TBS and online TMS, the role of anatomical distance between stimulated regions and how TMS effects are operationalised. Furthermore, our findings highlight the importance of active control conditions in brain stimulation experiments to accurately assess functional and causal connectivity between specific brain regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris I A Groen
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1366, United States; Video and Image Sense Lab, Institute for Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Edward H Silson
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1366, United States; Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - David Pitcher
- Department of Psychology, The University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Chris I Baker
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1366, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kidder A, Silson EH, Baker CI. Visual memory recall for personally familiar objects in medial parietal cortex. J Vis 2020. [DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.11.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
13
|
Silson EH, Kumar S, Jung B, Koele E, James C, Messinger A, Baker CI, Taubert J. Comparing population receptive fields in human and macaque visual cortex. J Vis 2019. [DOI: 10.1167/19.10.123a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
14
|
Strong SL, Silson EH, Gouws AD, Morland AB, McKeefry DJ. Motion-Defined Form Discrimination in Human V5/MT+. J Vis 2019. [DOI: 10.1167/19.10.287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - André D Gouws
- York Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, UK
| | - Antony B Morland
- York Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, UK
- Centre for Neuroscience, Hull-York Medical School, University of York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Steel A, Silson EH, Kidder A, Gilmore AW, Baker CI. Recall of people and places reveals regions showing distinct effects of category and familiarity in high-level cortex. J Vis 2019. [DOI: 10.1167/19.10.204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Steel
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health
- Wellcome Centre for Integrated Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford
| | - Edward H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health
| | - Alexis Kidder
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health
| | - Adrian W Gilmore
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health
| | - Chris I Baker
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Silson EH, Steel A, Kidder A, Gilmore AW, Baker CI. Distinct subdivisions of human medial parietal cortex support recollection of people and places. eLife 2019; 8:47391. [PMID: 31305238 PMCID: PMC6667275 DOI: 10.7554/elife.47391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Human medial parietal cortex (MPC) is implicated in multiple cognitive processes including memory recall, visual scene processing and navigation, and is a core component of the default mode network. Here, we demonstrate distinct subdivisions of MPC that are selectively recruited during memory recall of either specific people or places. First, distinct regions of MPC exhibited differential functional connectivity with medial and lateral regions of ventral temporal cortex (VTC). Second, these same medial regions showed selective, but negative, responses to the visual presentation of different stimulus categories, with clear preferences for scenes and faces. Finally, and most critically, these regions were differentially recruited during memory recall of either people or places with a strong familiarity advantage. Taken together, these data suggest that the organizing principle defining the medial-lateral axis of VTC is reflected in MPC, but in the context of memory recall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain & Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
| | - Adam Steel
- Laboratory of Brain & Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States.,Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alexis Kidder
- Laboratory of Brain & Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
| | - Adrian W Gilmore
- Laboratory of Brain & Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
| | - Chris I Baker
- Laboratory of Brain & Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Strong SL, Silson EH, Gouws AD, Morland AB, McKeefry DJ. An enhanced role for right hV5/MT+ in the analysis of motion in the contra- and ipsi-lateral visual hemi-fields. Behav Brain Res 2019; 372:112060. [PMID: 31251957 PMCID: PMC6682608 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
TMS applied to MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2 disrupts translational motion. In the right hemisphere, disruption affects contra-and ipsi-lateral hemi-fields. In the left hemisphere, disruption is restricted to the contra-lateral hemi-field. Suggests enhanced role for right hemisphere in full-field motion perception.
Previous experiments have demonstrated that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of human V5/MT+, in either the left or right cerebral hemisphere, can induce deficits in visual motion perception in their respective contra- and ipsi-lateral visual hemi-fields. However, motion deficits in the ipsi-lateral hemi-field are greater when TMS is applied to V5/MT + in the right hemisphere relative to the left hemisphere. One possible explanation for this asymmetry might lie in differential stimulation of sub-divisions within V5/MT + across the two hemispheres. V5/MT + has two major sub-divisions; MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2, the latter area contains neurons with large receptive fields (RFs) that extend up to 15° further into the ipsi-lateral hemi-field than the former. We wanted to examine whether applying TMS to MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2 separately could explain the previously reported functional asymmetries for ipsi-lateral motion processing in V5/MT + across right and left cerebral hemispheres. MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2 were identified in seven subjects using fMRI localisers. In psychophysical experiments subjects identified the translational direction (up/down) of coherently moving dots presented in either the left or right visual field whilst repetitive TMS (25 Hz; 70%) was applied synchronously with stimulus presentation. Application of TMS to MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2 in the right hemisphere affected translational direction discrimination in both contra-lateral and ipsi-lateral visual fields. In contrast, deficits of motion perception following application of TMS to MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2 in the left hemisphere were restricted to the contra-lateral visual field. This result suggests an enhanced role for the right hemisphere in processing translational motion across the full visual field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Strong
- Aston Optometry School, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK; School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK.
| | - Edward H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - André D Gouws
- York Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Antony B Morland
- York Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK; Centre for Neuroscience, Hull-York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Declan J McKeefry
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Silson EH, Aleman TS, Willett A, Serrano LW, Pearson DJ, Rauschecker AM, Maguire AM, Baker CI, Bennett J, Ashtari M. Comparing Clinical Perimetry and Population Receptive Field Measures in Patients with Choroideremia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019; 59:3249-3258. [PMID: 29971442 PMCID: PMC6110169 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-23929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Choroideremia (CHM) is an X-linked recessive form of hereditary retinal degeneration, which, at advanced stages, leaves only small central islands of preserved retinal tissue. Unlike many other retinal diseases, the spared tissue in CHM supports excellent central vision and stable fixation. Such spared topography in CHM presents an ideal platform to explore the relationship between preserved central retinal structure and the retinotopic organization of visual cortex by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Methods fMRI was conducted in four participants with CHM and four healthy control participants while they viewed drifting contrast pattern stimuli monocularly. A single ∼3-minute fMRI run was collected for each eye separately. fMRI data were analyzed using the population receptive field (pRF) modeling approach. Participants also underwent ophthalmic evaluations of visual acuity and static automatic perimetry. Results The spatial distribution and strength of pRF estimates correlated positively and significantly with clinical outcome measures in most participants with CHM. Importantly, the positive relationship between clinical and pRF measurements increased with increasing disease progression. A less consistent relationship was observed for control participants. Conclusions Although reflecting only a small sample size, clinical evaluations of visual function in participants with CHM were well characterized by the spatial distribution and strength of pRF estimates by using a single ∼3-minute fMRI experiment. fMRI data analyzed with pRF modeling may be an efficient and objective outcome measure to complement current ophthalmic evaluations. Specifically, pRF modeling may be a feasible approach for evaluating the impact of interventions to restore visual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward H Silson
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Tomas S Aleman
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Aimee Willett
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Leona W Serrano
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Denise J Pearson
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Andreas M Rauschecker
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Albert M Maguire
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Chris I Baker
- Section on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Jean Bennett
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Manzar Ashtari
- Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steel A, Silson EH, Stagg CJ, Baker CI. Differential impact of reward and punishment on functional connectivity after skill learning. Neuroimage 2019; 189:95-105. [PMID: 30630080 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Reward and punishment shape behavior, but the mechanisms underlying their effect on skill learning are not well understood. Here, we tested whether the functional connectivity of premotor cortex (PMC), a region known to be critical for learning of sequencing skills, is altered after training when reward or punishment is given during training. Resting-state fMRI was collected in two experiments before and after participants trained on either a serial reaction time task (SRTT; n = 36) or force-tracking task (FTT; n = 36) with reward, punishment, or control feedback. In each experiment, training-related change in PMC functional connectivity was compared across feedback groups. In both tasks, we found that reward and punishment differentially affected PMC functional connectivity. On the SRTT, participants trained with reward showed an increase in functional connectivity between PMC and cerebellum as well as PMC and striatum, while participants trained with punishment showed an increase in functional connectivity between PMC and medial temporal lobe connectivity. After training on the FTT, subjects trained with control and reward showed increases in PMC connectivity with parietal and temporal cortices after training, while subjects trained with punishment showed increased PMC connectivity with ventral striatum. While the results from the two experiments overlapped in some areas, including ventral pallidum, temporal lobe, and cerebellum, these regions showed diverging patterns of results across the two tasks for the different feedback conditions. These findings suggest that reward and punishment strongly influence spontaneous brain activity after training, and that the regions implicated depend on the task learned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Steel
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK; Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
| | - Edward H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| | - Charlotte J Stagg
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK; Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Chris I Baker
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Malcolm GL, Silson EH, Henry JR, Baker CI. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Occipital Place Area Biases Gaze During Scene Viewing. Front Hum Neurosci 2018; 12:189. [PMID: 29867413 PMCID: PMC5953332 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
We can understand viewed scenes and extract task-relevant information within a few hundred milliseconds. This process is generally supported by three cortical regions that show selectivity for scene images: parahippocampal place area (PPA), medial place area (MPA) and occipital place area (OPA). Prior studies have focused on the visual information each region is responsive to, usually within the context of recognition or navigation. Here, we move beyond these tasks to investigate gaze allocation during scene viewing. Eye movements rely on a scene’s visual representation to direct saccades, and thus foveal vision. In particular, we focus on the contribution of OPA, which is: (i) located in occipito-parietal cortex, likely feeding information into parts of the dorsal pathway critical for eye movements; and (ii) contains strong retinotopic representations of the contralateral visual field. Participants viewed scene images for 1034 ms while their eye movements were recorded. On half of the trials, a 500 ms train of five transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses was applied to the participant’s cortex, starting at scene onset. TMS was applied to the right hemisphere over either OPA or the occipital face area (OFA), which also exhibits a contralateral visual field bias but shows selectivity for face stimuli. Participants generally made an overall left-to-right, top-to-bottom pattern of eye movements across all conditions. When TMS was applied to OPA, there was an increased saccade latency for eye movements toward the contralateral relative to the ipsilateral visual field after the final TMS pulse (400 ms). Additionally, TMS to the OPA biased fixation positions away from the contralateral side of the scene compared to the control condition, while the OFA group showed no such effect. There was no effect on horizontal saccade amplitudes. These combined results suggest that OPA might serve to represent local scene information that can then be utilized by visuomotor control networks to guide gaze allocation in natural scenes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George L Malcolm
- School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.,Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Edward H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jennifer R Henry
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Chris I Baker
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Two subdivisions of human V5/MT+: one located posteriorly (MT/TO-1) and the other more anteriorly (MST/TO-2) were identified in human participants using functional magnetic resonance imaging on the basis of their representations of the ipsilateral versus contralateral visual field. These subdivisions were then targeted for disruption by the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The rTMS was delivered to cortical areas while participants performed direction discrimination tasks involving 3 different types of moving stimuli defined by the translational, radial, or rotational motion of dot patterns. For translational motion, performance was significantly reduced relative to baseline when rTMS was applied to both MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2. For radial motion, there was a differential effect between MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2, with only disruption of the latter area affecting performance. The rTMS failed to reveal a complete dissociation between MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2 in terms of their contribution to the perception of rotational motion. On the basis of these results, MT/TO-1 and MST/TO-2 appear to be functionally distinct subdivisions of hV5/MT+. While both areas appear to be implicated in the processing of translational motion, only the anterior region (MST/TO-2) makes a causal contribution to the perception of radial motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L. Strong
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
- Department of Psychology, York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Edward H. Silson
- Department of Psychology, York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - André D. Gouws
- Department of Psychology, York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Antony B. Morland
- Department of Psychology, York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Centre for Neuroscience, Hull-York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Declan J. McKeefry
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
- Address correspondence to Declan J. McKeefry, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Strong SL, Silson EH, Gouws AD, Morland AB, McKeefry DJ. Differential processing of the direction and focus of expansion of optic flow stimuli in areas MST and V3A of the human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 2017; 117:2209-2217. [PMID: 28298300 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00031.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Human neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have raised the possibility that different attributes of optic flow stimuli, namely radial direction and the position of the focus of expansion (FOE), are processed within separate cortical areas. In the human brain, visual areas V5/MT+ and V3A have been proposed as integral to the analysis of these different attributes of optic flow stimuli. To establish direct causal relationships between neural activity in human (h)V5/MT+ and V3A and the perception of radial motion direction and FOE position, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to disrupt cortical activity in these areas while participants performed behavioral tasks dependent on these different aspects of optic flow stimuli. The cortical regions of interest were identified in seven human participants using standard functional MRI retinotopic mapping techniques and functional localizers. TMS to area V3A was found to disrupt FOE positional judgments but not radial direction discrimination, whereas the application of TMS to an anterior subdivision of hV5/MT+, MST/TO-2 produced the reverse effects, disrupting radial direction discrimination but eliciting no effect on the FOE positional judgment task. This double dissociation demonstrates that FOE position and radial direction of optic flow stimuli are signaled independently by neural activity in areas hV5/MT+ and V3A.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Optic flow constitutes a biologically relevant visual cue as we move through any environment. With the use of neuroimaging and brain-stimulation techniques, this study demonstrates that separate human brain areas are involved in the analysis of the direction of radial motion and the focus of expansion in optic flow. This dissociation reveals the existence of separate processing pathways for the analysis of different attributes of optic flow that are important for the guidance of self-locomotion and object avoidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Strong
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.,York Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Edward H Silson
- York Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.,Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and
| | - André D Gouws
- York Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Antony B Morland
- York Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.,Centre for Neuroscience, Hull-York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Declan J McKeefry
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Groen IIA, Silson EH, Baker CI. Contributions of low- and high-level properties to neural processing of visual scenes in the human brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2017; 372:rstb.2016.0102. [PMID: 28044013 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Visual scene analysis in humans has been characterized by the presence of regions in extrastriate cortex that are selectively responsive to scenes compared with objects or faces. While these regions have often been interpreted as representing high-level properties of scenes (e.g. category), they also exhibit substantial sensitivity to low-level (e.g. spatial frequency) and mid-level (e.g. spatial layout) properties, and it is unclear how these disparate findings can be united in a single framework. In this opinion piece, we suggest that this problem can be resolved by questioning the utility of the classical low- to high-level framework of visual perception for scene processing, and discuss why low- and mid-level properties may be particularly diagnostic for the behavioural goals specific to scene perception as compared to object recognition. In particular, we highlight the contributions of low-level vision to scene representation by reviewing (i) retinotopic biases and receptive field properties of scene-selective regions and (ii) the temporal dynamics of scene perception that demonstrate overlap of low- and mid-level feature representations with those of scene category. We discuss the relevance of these findings for scene perception and suggest a more expansive framework for visual scene analysis.This article is part of the themed issue 'Auditory and visual scene analysis'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris I A Groen
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive 10-3N228, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Edward H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive 10-3N228, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chris I Baker
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive 10-3N228, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Silson EH, Groen IIA, Kravitz DJ, Baker CI. Evaluating the correspondence between face-, scene-, and object-selectivity and retinotopic organization within lateral occipitotemporal cortex. J Vis 2016; 16:14. [PMID: 27105060 PMCID: PMC4898275 DOI: 10.1167/16.6.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The organization of human lateral occipitotemporal cortex (lOTC) has been characterized largely according to two distinct principles: retinotopy and category-selectivity. Whereas category-selective regions were originally thought to exist beyond retinotopic maps, recent evidence highlights overlap. Here, we combined detailed mapping of retinotopy, using population receptive fields (pRF), and category-selectivity to examine and contrast the retinotopic profiles of scene- (occipital place area, OPA), face- (occipital face area, OFA) and object- (lateral occipital cortex, LO) selective regions of lOTC. We observe striking differences in the relationship each region has to underlying retinotopy. Whereas OPA overlapped multiple retinotopic maps (including V3A, V3B, LO1, and LO2), and LO overlapped two maps (LO1 and LO2), OFA overlapped almost none. There appears no simple consistent relationship between category-selectivity and retinotopic maps, meaning category-selective regions are not constrained spatially to retinotopic map borders consistently. The multiple maps that overlap OPA suggests it is likely not appropriate to conceptualize it as a single scene-selective region, whereas the inconsistency in any systematic map overlapping OFA suggests it may constitute a more uniform area. Beyond their relationship to retinotopy, all three regions evidenced strongly retinotopic voxels, with pRFs exhibiting a significant bias towards the contralateral lower visual field, despite differences in pRF size, contributing to an emerging literature suggesting this bias is present across much of lOTC. Taken together, these results suggest that whereas category-selective regions are not constrained to consistently contain ordered retinotopic maps, they nonetheless likely inherit retinotopic characteristics of the maps from which they draw information.
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Functional imaging studies in human reliably identify a trio of scene-selective regions, one on each of the lateral [occipital place area (OPA)], ventral [parahippocampal place area (PPA)], and medial [retrosplenial complex (RSC)] cortical surfaces. Recently, we demonstrated differential retinotopic biases for the contralateral lower and upper visual fields within OPA and PPA, respectively. Here, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we combine detailed mapping of both population receptive fields (pRF) and category-selectivity, with independently acquired resting-state functional connectivity analyses, to examine scene and retinotopic processing within medial parietal cortex. We identified a medial scene-selective region, which was contained largely within the posterior and ventral bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus (POS). While this region is typically referred to as RSC, the spatial extent of our scene-selective region typically did not extend into retrosplenial cortex, and thus we adopt the term medial place area (MPA) to refer to this visually defined scene-selective region. Intriguingly MPA co-localized with a region identified solely on the basis of retinotopic sensitivity using pRF analyses. We found that MPA demonstrates a significant contralateral visual field bias, coupled with large pRF sizes. Unlike OPA and PPA, MPA did not show a consistent bias to a single visual quadrant. MPA also co-localized with a region identified by strong differential functional connectivity with PPA and the human face-selective fusiform face area (FFA), commensurate with its functional selectivity. Functional connectivity with OPA was much weaker than with PPA, and similar to that with face-selective occipital face area (OFA), suggesting a closer link with ventral than lateral cortex. Consistent with prior research, we also observed differential functional connectivity in medial parietal cortex for anterior over posterior PPA, as well as a region on the lateral surface, the caudal inferior parietal lobule (cIPL). However, the differential connectivity in medial parietal cortex was found principally anterior of MPA. We suggest that there is posterior–anterior gradient within medial parietal cortex, with posterior regions in the POS showing retinotopically based scene-selectivity and more anterior regions showing connectivity that may be more reflective of abstract, navigationally pertinent and possibly mnemonic representations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward H Silson
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National institute of Mental Health Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Adam D Steel
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National institute of Mental HealthBethesda, MD, USA; Physiological Neuroimaging Group FMRIB Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of OxfordOxford, UK
| | - Chris I Baker
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National institute of Mental Health Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|