The effect of CPAP on the upper airway and ventilatory flow in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the mainstay of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, data about its effect on the upper airway, especially the epiglottis, are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in upper airway dimensions and inspiratory flow in response to incremental pressure levels.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial in which patients with moderate to severe OSA underwent drug-induced sleep endoscopy with simultaneous recordings of flow and mask pressure. CPAP was titrated in small increments. For each pressure level a representative 3-breath segment was selected to determine specific flow features. The corresponding endoscopic footage was reviewed to assess the degree of upper airway collapse in a semi-quantitative manner.

RESULTS

A total of 214 breath segments were obtained from 13 participants (median [Q1-Q3]; apnea-hypopnea index, 24.9 [20.1-43.9] events/h; body mass index 28.1 [25.1-31.7] kg/m²). CPAP significantly increased cross-sectional dimensions of the soft palate, lateral walls and tongue base, but not of the epiglottis, and induced epiglottis collapse in one subject. Increased pressure improved peak inspiratory flow and median ventilation in all patients, even in the presence of persistent epiglottis collapse.

CONCLUSION

CPAP does not effectively address epiglottis collapse in patients with OSA. However, it normalizes inspiratory flow regardless of its effect on the epiglottis. This clinical trial was registered on January 18th, 2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT04232410.

Critical to Know Pcrit: A Review on Pharyngeal Critical Closing Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

It is crucial to understand the underlying pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Upper airway collapsibility is an important pathophysiological factor that affects the upper airway in OSA. The aim of the current study was to review the existing body of knowledge on the pharyngeal collapsibility in OSA. After a thorough search through Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of science, the relevant articles were found and used in this study. Critical closing pressure (Pcrit) is the gold standard measure for the degree of collapsibility of the pharyngeal airway. Various physiological factors and treatments affect upper airway collapsibility. Recently, it has been shown that the baseline value of Pcrit is helpful in the upfront selection of therapy options. The standard techniques to measure Pcrit are labor-intensive and time-consuming. Therefore, despite the importance of Pcrit, it is not routinely measured in clinical practice. New emerging surrogates, such as finite element (FE) modeling or the use of peak inspiratory flow measurements during a routine overnight polysomnography, may enable clinicians to have an estimate of the pharyngeal collapsibility. However, validation of these techniques is needed.

Critical closing pressure (Pcrit) of the pharyngeal airway during routine drug-induced sleep endoscopy: feasibility and protocol

In obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there are various pathophysiological factors affecting the upper airway during sleep. Two prominent factors contributing to OSA are site and pattern of upper airway collapse and degree of pharyngeal collapsibility. In a clinical setting, drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used to visualize the structures of the upper airway. Critical closing pressure (Pcrit) is the gold standard measure of pharyngeal collapsibility. This prospective clinical study aimed to investigate the feasibility and protocol of Pcrit measurements during DISE. Thirteen patients with OSA were included. Pcrit was calculated using peak inspiratory airflow and inspiratory ventilation. The proposed protocol was successful in Pcrit measurement during DISE in all subjects [median[Q1;Q3] Pcrit for “peak inspiratory method” (n = 12): −0.84[−2.07;0.69] cmH₂O, “ventilation method” (n = 13): −1.32[2.32;0.47] cmH₂O], highlighting the feasibility of the approach. There was no significant difference (P = 0.67) between calculated Pcrit with either of the calculation methods, indicating high reliability. Correlation analysis showed Pcrit as an independent parameter of any of the anthropometric or polysomnographic parameters. The ventilation method proved to be more successful in assessment of Pcrit in subjects with epiglottic collapse (e.g., with high negative effort dependence). Subjects with palatal complete concentric collapse during DISE had a wide Pcrit range ([−2.86;2.51]cmH₂O), suggesting no close correlation between Pcrit and this DISE pattern (P = 0.38). Incorporation of Pcrit measurements into DISE assessments is feasible and may yield valuable additional information for OSA management. Combining Pcrit and DISE provides information on both the site and degree of upper airway collapse and the degree of pharyngeal collapsibility.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY The protocol of this study was successful in concomitant measurement of Pcrit during routine clinical endoscopy. Comparison of two calculation methods for Pcrit showed that the inspiratory ventilation method was more successful in assessment of Pcrit in subjects with epiglottic collapse who have high negative effort dependence. Subjects with palatal complete concentric collapse during DISE had a wide Pcrit range and did not have a greater Pcrit than patients in other site of collapse categories.

Comparison of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Natural Sleep Endoscopy in the Assessment of Upper Airway Pathophysiology During Sleep: Protocol and Study Design

Study Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is increasingly recognized as a complex and heterogenous disorder. As a result, a "one-size-fits-all" management approach should be avoided. Therefore, evaluation of pathophysiological endotyping in OSA patients is emphasized, with upper airway collapse during sleep as one of the main features. To assess the site(s) and pattern(s) of upper airway collapse, natural sleep endoscopy (NSE) is defined as the gold standard. As NSE is labor-intensive and time-consuming, it is not feasible in routine practice. Instead, drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is the most frequently used technique and can be considered as the clinical standard. Flow shape and snoring analysis are non-invasive measurement techniques, yet are still evolving. Although DISE is used as the clinical alternative to assess upper airway collapse, associations between DISE and NSE observations, and associated flow and snoring signals, have not been quantified satisfactorily. In the current project we aim to compare upper airway collapse identified in patients with OSA using endoscopic techniques as well as flow shape analysis and analysis of tracheal snoring sounds between natural and drug-induced sleep. Methods: This study is a blinded prospective comparative multicenter cohort study. The study population will consist of adult patients with a recent diagnosis of OSA. Eligible patients will undergo a polysomnography (PSG) with NSE overnight and a DISE within 3 months. During DISE the upper airway is assessed under sedation by an experienced ear, nose, throat (ENT) surgeon using a flexible fiberoptic endoscope in the operating theater. In contrast to DISE, NSE is performed during natural sleep using a pediatric bronchoscope. During research DISE and NSE, the standard set-up is expanded with additional PSG measurements, including gold standard flow and analysis of tracheal snoring sounds. Conclusions: This project will be one of the first studies to formally compare collapse patterns during natural and drug-induced sleep. Moreover, this will be, to the authors' best knowledge, the first comparative research in airflow shape and tracheal snoring sounds analysis between DISE and NSE. These novel and non-invasive diagnostic methods studying upper airway mechanics during sleep will be simultaneously validated against DISE and NSE. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04729478.

Natural sleep endoscopy in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

This study's objective is to systematically review the literature on natural sleep endoscopy (NSE), including the set-up, different scoring systems, visualized collapse patterns during natural sleep, additional measurements, and comparison of upper airway collapse between NSE and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). A computerized search on Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane library was conducted, obtaining 39 hits. Ten prospective studies were included in which NSE was performed in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study's findings suggest the soft palate to be the most frequent site of obstruction (58.8 %), followed by the tongue base (43.2 %), lateral walls (29.9 %), and epiglottis (22.4 %), which is in line with previous findings during DISE. Based on this literature review, the authors conclude that at this stage high quality, comparative research between DISE and NSE is missing. To adequately compare findings between OSA patients, endoscopic classification of upper airway collapse should be standardized. Non-invasive predictive tools to determine pharyngeal collapse are currently under investigation and may obviate the need for invasive endoscopy. This review highlights the contribution of NSE in validating such novel diagnostic methods and in studying upper airway mechanics in a research setting, yet larger and adequately powered studies are needed.

Correction to: Remotely controlled mandibular positioning of oral appliance therapy during polysomnography and drug-induced sleep endoscopy compared with conventional subjective titration in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: protocol for a randomized crossover trial

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that Fig. 1 had not been corrected based on the reviewer's comments. The correct Fig. 1 is presented below.

Remotely controlled mandibular positioning of oral appliance therapy during polysomnography and drug-induced sleep endoscopy compared with conventional subjective titration in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: protocol for a randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND

The amount of mandibular protrusion is a key factor in optimizing the efficacy of mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy in an individual patient diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. This process is called titration and is generally based on resolution of subjective symptoms like snoring and/or daytime sleepiness as a function of protrusion. An objective approach uses a remotely controlled mandibular positioner (RCMP) during a full-night polysomnography (PSG), in analogy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration. More recently, the feasibility of RCMP use during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) titration was reported.

METHODS

This randomized crossover trial will compare DISE-assisted titration to PSG-guided titration, as well as with the conventional subjective titration method. The primary outcome is the actual mandibular protrusive position found to be the most optimal for each tested titration procedure. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy will be compared among the different titration modalities using level 1 sleep studies.

DISCUSSION

Currently, the optimal titration of MAD therapy is most often based on 'trial and error'. The conventional method relies on subjective improvement in symptoms, although this may not provide the most accurate indicator for efficient titration. Therefore, relying on objective criteria in the titration process should be advantageous. In analogy with CPAP, titration of the most optimal mandibular protrusion could be performed using RCMP during an overnight titration PSG. Recently, it was shown that titration under direct visualization of upper airway patency and collapsibility is feasible using the RCMP during DISE. However, no clinical results for such a procedure are as yet available. This study is the first to compare the most optimal mandibular protrusive position according to three titration procedures, as well as to compare the therapeutic efficacy of these titration methods.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03716648 . Registered on 23 October 2018.

Scoring of Hypersomnolence and Fatigue in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treated With a Titratable Custom-Made Mandibular Advancement Device

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to measure fatigue and hypersomnolence in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with a mandibular advancement device (MAD), using Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) for hypersomnolence and Checklist Individual Strength questionnaire (CIS20R) for fatigue.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. A total of 58 patients with OSA filled out ESS and CIS20R questionnaires at baseline and after 3 months of MAD treatment. A total of 39 full datasets were collected. Statistical analysis for reliability of the questionnaires, comparison between baseline and 3-month follow-up, correlation between the changes in the values of the two questionnaires, and changes in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were performed.

RESULTS

CIS20R showed excellent reliability in this patient group at baseline and 3-month follow-up (Cronbach α = .97), ESS showed a marginally good reliability (Cronbach α = .82). The CIS20R (82/140) expressed high levels of fatigue at baseline, and ESS showed a normal level of daytime sleepiness. AHI, ESS, and CIS20R were significantly reduced under MAD treatment. A significant correlation between ESS and CIS20R was observed. No significant correlation between any of the questionnaires and the change in AHI was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The CIS20R questionnaire results showed a high level of fatigue in the patients with OSA, and the questionnaire can be used to evaluate changes in fatigue due to MAD treatment after 3 months. The ESS failed to show similar characteristics. Therefore, a combination of ESS for hypersomnolence with CIS20R for fatigue is proposed for the follow-up of patients with OSA treated with MAD.