United States Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Meningococcal Vaccination for Healthy Adolescents and Young Adults

PURPOSE

The United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends vaccination against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY) for all 11-12-year-olds, with a booster dose for 16-year-olds, and against meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) for 16-23-year-olds under shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). However, uptake of the MenB vaccine and the MenACWY booster dose is low. This study investigated United States physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding recommending MenB and MenACWY vaccines to non-high-risk older adolescents and young adults.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted in April-May 2022 among pediatricians, family physicians (FPs), general practitioners (GPs), and internists who had recommended the MenB and/or the MenACWY vaccine(s) to at least one 16-23-year-old in the past year.

RESULTS

Among 407 participants, 50% correctly identified MenB as the leading cause of meningococcal disease among adolescents and young adults. Furthermore, 46% of physicians (47% of pediatricians, 40% of FPs and GPs, 53% of internists) answered correctly that MenB vaccination is recommended under SCDM, and 82% of physicians (96% of pediatricians, 70% of FPs and GPs, 65% of internists) answered correctly that MenACWY vaccination is routinely recommended. Among MenB-vaccinators, 78% reported having received some training or other information on implementing SCDM, and 65% rated recommending MenB vaccination as very important.

DISCUSSION

Knowledge gaps, which varied by specialty, were identified regarding meningococcal disease and vaccine recommendations, particularly regarding MenB. Targeted education of physicians may facilitate discussions about MenB vaccination.

Health-Related Quality of Life With Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma From CheckMate 649

PURPOSE

In CheckMate 649, first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy prolonged overall survival versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic non-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We present exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

In patients (N = 1,581) concurrently randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy and in those with tumor PD-L1 expression at a combined positive score (CPS) of ≥5, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the EQ-5D and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gastric (FACT-Ga), which included the FACT-General (FACT-G) and Gastric Cancer subscale (GaCS). The FACT-G GP5 item assessed treatment-related symptom burden. Longitudinal changes in HRQoL were assessed using mixed models for repeated measures in the PRO analysis population (randomly assigned patients with baseline and ≥1 postbaseline assessments). Time to symptom or definitive deterioration analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

In the PRO analysis population (n = 1,360), PRO questionnaire completion rates were mostly >80% during treatment. Patient-reported symptom burden was not increased with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy. Mean improved changes from baseline were greater with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for FACT-Ga total, GaCS, and EQ-5D visual analog scale in patients with a CPS of ≥5; results were similar for the overall PRO analysis population. In CPS ≥5 and all randomly assigned populations, nivolumab plus chemotherapy reduced the risk of symptom deterioration versus chemotherapy, on the basis of FACT-Ga total score and GaCS; time to definitive deterioration was longer, and the risk of definitive deterioration in HRQoL was reduced with nivolumab plus chemotherapy across EQ-5D and most FACT-Ga measures (hazard ratio [95% CI] <1).

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy alone, first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy showed stable or better on-treatment HRQoL in patients with advanced/metastatic non-HER2-positive GC/GEJC/EAC and also showed decreased risk of definitive HRQoL deterioration.

A post hoc analysis of Projected Retained Ability Scores (PRAS) for the longitudinal assessment of cognitive functioning in patients with neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidosis II receiving intrathecal idursulfase-IT

BACKGROUND

Norm-based scores used to assess cognitive ability have clinical value when describing functioning of patients with neuronopathic disorders compared with unaffected, same-age peers. However, they have limitations when used to assess change in cognitive ability between two timepoints, especially in children with severe cognitive decline. Calculation of Projected Retained Ability Scores (PRAS) is a novel method developed to characterize absolute change in norm-based ability test scores. In this analysis, PRAS were calculated post hoc for children with mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome) and early cognitive impairment in a 52-week phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and its extension study of intrathecal idursulfase (idursulfase-IT). Patients completing the first year of the extension after receiving idursulfase-IT in the RCT and extension (n = 32 of 34 enrolled) or the extension only (n = 15 of 15 enrolled) were categorized according to changes in Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition, General Conceptual Ability (DAS-II GCA) scores and PRAS at 1 and 2 years. Analyses were conducted in the overall population and a subpopulation aged < 6 years at baseline (idursulfase-IT in the RCT and extension [n = 27] and extension only [n = 12]).

RESULTS

PRAS methodology differentiated patients with decreases in DAS-II GCA scores into three separate categories reflecting below-average cognitive growth rates, plateauing cognitive development, and deteriorating cognitive functioning. After 1 year in the RCT, 72.4% of patients who initiated idursulfase-IT had above-average or average cognitive growth rates in DAS-II GCA scores compared with 53.3% of those who did not receive idursulfase-IT; 6.9% versus 20.0% experienced deteriorating cognitive functioning. Similar results were seen in children aged < 6 years: 76% (idursulfase-IT group) versus 50% (no idursulfase-IT) had above-average or average cognitive growth rates in DAS-II GCA scores; 4% versus 17% had deteriorating cognitive functioning. The difference in the distributions of cognitive categories at 1 year in children aged < 6 years was significant (p = 0.048). At 2 years, the proportions of patients in different cognitive categories were more similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PRAS methodology may help to differentiate changes in cognitive development in MPS II, and therefore may represent a valuable addition to existing approaches for interpreting changes in cognitive scores over time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02055118 (registration date: 4 February 2014) and NCT02412787 (registration date: 9 April 2015).

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of European Healthcare Professionals towards Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B Vaccination in at-Risk Adults

Despite the occurrence of several hepatitis A (hepA) and hepatitis B (hepB) outbreaks in Europe in the last few decades, not all European countries have implemented hepA and hepB vaccinations in their national immunization programs, especially for adults at risk for hepA and/or hepB infection, such as men who have sex with men or patients with chronic liver disease. Currently, little is known on the attitudes of European healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards hepA and hepB vaccinations for at-risk adults. We conducted an online survey among HCPs in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom to assess their awareness of and adherence to their national hepA and hepB vaccination guidelines for at-risk adults. Among the 698 HCPs who took the survey, most (91.1%) were familiar with their national vaccination recommendations and always followed them or followed them most of the time when advising or prescribing hepA or hepB vaccines. Major and moderate barriers for recommending or administering such vaccines were the non-disclosure of risk factors by the patient (53.0-57.6%) and the patient's lack of motivation or knowledge about the risk of the disease (50.3-52.9%). These results may help inform strategies to improve and accelerate hepA and hepB vaccination in European at-risk adults.

Effects of tolvaptan discontinuation in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a post hoc pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Tolvaptan slows kidney function decline in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) who are at risk of rapid progression. Given that treatment requires commitment to long-term use, we evaluated the effects of tolvaptan discontinuation on the trajectory of ADPKD progression.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from two clinical trials of tolvaptan (TEMPO 2:4 [NCT00413777] and TEMPO 3:4 [NCT00428948]), an extension trial (TEMPO 4:4 [NCT01214421]), and an observational study (OVERTURE [NCT01430494]) that enrolled patients from the other trials. Individual subject data were linked longitudinally across trials to construct analysis cohorts of subjects with a tolvaptan treatment duration > 180 days followed by an off-treatment observation period of > 180 days. For inclusion in Cohort 1, subjects were required have ≥ 2 outcome assessments during the tolvaptan treatment period and ≥ 2 assessments during the follow-up period. For Cohort 2, subjects were required to have ≥ 1 assessment during the tolvaptan treatment period and ≥ 1 assessment during the follow-up period. Outcomes were rates of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and total kidney volume (TKV). Piecewise-mixed models compared changes in eGFR or TKV in the on-treatment and post-treatment periods.

RESULTS

In the Cohort 1 eGFR population (n = 20), the annual rate of eGFR change (in mL/min/1.73 m2) was -3.18 on treatment and -4.33 post-treatment, a difference that was not significant (P = 0.16), whereas in Cohort 2 (n = 82), the difference between on treatment (-1.89) and post-treatment (-4.94) was significant (P < 0.001). In the Cohort 1 TKV population (n = 11), TKV increased annually by 5.18% on treatment and 11.69% post-treatment (P = 0.06). In Cohort 2 (n = 88), the annual TKV growth rates were 5.15% on treatment and 8.16% post-treatment (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by small sample sizes, these analyses showed directionally consistent acceleration in measures of ADPKD progression following the discontinuation of tolvaptan.

Tolvaptan and Kidney Function Decline in Older Individuals With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies

Rationale & Objective

Tolvaptan is indicated for treatment of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) at risk of rapid progression. Participants aged 56-65 years constituted a small proportion of the Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: an Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in ADPKD (REPRISE) trial population. We assessed effects of tolvaptan on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline in participants aged >55 years.

Study Design

This was a pooled data analysis from 8 studies of tolvaptan or non-tolvaptan standard of care (SOC).

Setting & Participants

Participants aged >55 years with ADPKD were included. Data on participants in >1 study were linked longitudinally for maximum follow-up duration, with matching for age, sex, eGFR, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage to minimize confounding.

Interventions

Tolvaptan or non-tolvaptan SOC.

Outcomes

Treatment effects on annualized eGFR decline were compared using mixed models with fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline eGFR.

Results

In the pooled studies, 230 tolvaptan-treated and 907 SOC participants were aged >55 years at baseline. Ninety-five participant pairs from each treatment group were matched, all in CKD G3 or G4, ranging from 56.0 to 65.0 years (tolvaptan) or from 55.1 to 67.0 years (SOC). The eGFR annual decline rate was significantly reduced by 1.66 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI, 0.43-2.90; P = 0.009) in the tolvaptan group compared with SOC (-2.33 versus -3.99 mL/min/1.73 m²) over 3 years.

Limitations

Limitations include potential bias because of study population differences (bias risk was reduced through matching and multiple regression adjustment); vascular disease history data was not uniformly collected, and therefore not adjusted; and natural history of ADPKD precludes evaluating certain clinical endpoints within the study time frame.

Conclusions

In individuals aged 56-65 years with CKD G3 or G4, compared to a SOC group with mean GFR rate of decline ≥3 mL/min/1.73 m²/year, tolvaptan was associated with efficacy similar to that observed in the overall indication.

Funding

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc (Rockville, MD).

Trial Registration

TEMPO 2:4 (NCT00413777); phase 1 tolvaptan trial (no NCT number; trial number 156-06-260); phase 2 tolvaptan trial (NCT01336972); TEMPO 4:4 (NCT01214421); REPRISE (NCT02160145); long-term tolvaptan safety extension trial (NCT02251275); OVERTURE (NCT01430494); HALT Progression of Polycystic Kidney Disease (HALT-PKD) study B (NCT01885559).

Hepatitis A and B vaccination in adults at risk: A survey of US healthcare providers' attitudes and practices

This study aimed to evaluate the attitudes and practices of US healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) vaccination recommendations on HepA and HepB for adult patients at risk of contracting these infections or experiencing complications of hepatitis disease. This cross-sectional, web-based survey of 400 US HCPs, which included nurse practitioners and family medicine, internal medicine, infectious disease, emergency department, and gastroenterology physicians, assessed HCPs' attitudes and practices regarding the ACIP recommendations for adult patients at risk for hepatitis disease. HCP participants were identified via a survey research panel. A recruitment quota of 400 HCPs was set, including 50 NPs, 100 FMs, 100 IMs, 50 GIs, 50 EDs, and 50 IDs. The most frequently reported reasons for not recommending either HepA or HepB vaccines were "I think the risk of HepA infection is low in this patient population" and "I am uncertain about what the guidelines say about vaccinating this population." The most reported factors considered when determining eligibility for either vaccine were medical history and the patient's willingness/motivation to be vaccinated. Most reported it was extremely or moderately important to prevent hepatitis disease by vaccinating adult patients at risk, and most also reported recommending a HepA vaccine or HepB vaccine to patients at risk. Although most HCPs reported recommending HepA and HepB vaccines to patients at risk, these findings contrast with the low reported vaccination rates among these populations, and improved awareness of the ACIP recommendations among HCPs is needed.

Pooled Data Analysis of the Long-Term Treatment Effects of Tolvaptan in ADPKD

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

What can Europe learn from HCP knowledge and attitudes towards hepatitis A vaccination in the US?

Background

An estimated &gt;100 million new hepatitis A (hepA) infections occur annually worldwide. Centres for disease control and prevention reported 38795 hepA cases in the US since 2016, and 4475 outbreak-confirmed cases in Europe between 2016-2018. HepA outbreaks resulted mainly from person-to-person contact, especially among homeless, illegal drug users (IDU) and men who have sex with men (MSM). In 2020, we surveyed US health care providers (HCPs) to understand their knowledge and attitudes towards hepA vaccination in these populations at higher risk of infection and complications.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional, web-based survey of 400 HCPs (primary care providers, nurse practitioners, gastroenterologists, internal medicine and infectious disease specialists [IDs], emergency room physicians [ERs]) who had recommended and/or administered hepA vaccines to ≥ 19-year-olds.

Results

85% of 371 HCPs reported recommending hepA vaccine to homeless, 87% of 393 to IDU and 83% of 397 to MSM, although vaccination may not actually occur after recommendation. Results varied by specialty, 16% fewer ERs than IDs reported recommending the vaccine in these at-risk populations. Moreover, 64%, 75% and 71% of all (400) HCPs reported extremely important that homeless, IDU and MSM, respectively, get vaccinated for hepA, while 6%, 7% and 8% of all HCPs reported this as slightly, or not important. Reasons for not recommending hepA vaccine to homeless, IDU and MSM included uncertainty on guidelines (reported by 22/56, 24/50 and 29/66 HCPs, respectively) and low risk of infection (reported by 20/56, 30/50 and 27/66 HCPs, respectively).

Conclusions

Despite recent hepA outbreaks and strengthened recommendations for vaccination in at-risk populations, knowledge gaps persist among US HCPs. This survey may motivate European countries to reinforce national hepA vaccination recommendations and, in parallel, consider efforts to raise vaccination awareness.

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA

Key messages

Education on hepatitis A vaccination recommendations in at-risk populations is needed. Health care providers’ vaccination knowledge plays a critical role to control the hepatitis A outbreak in the US and preventing hepatitis A in Europe.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC): Results of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO+chemo) versus chemo from CheckMate 649

167

Background: CheckMate 649 (NCT02872116) is a randomized, open label phase 3 study in first line (1L) treatment of pts with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. Primary analysis results showed statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for NIVO+chemo vs. chemo in all randomized pts. We present HRQOL results for these pts, included as an exploratory study objective. Methods: HRQOL was assessed using EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gastric Cancer (FACT-Ga). Assessments were performed at baseline (BL), every 6 weeks during treatment and during follow-up. Change from BL EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Utility Index (UI) and FACT-Ga scores were analyzed using mixed models. Time to first symptom deterioration (TTSD), time until definitive deterioration (TuDD), and time to improvement (TTI) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier estimators and stratified Cox models; deterioration/improvement was based on prespecified meaningful change thresholds. Results: 1581 pts were randomized to NIVO+chemo (n = 789) or chemo (n = 792). Among 1359 pts with BL and post-BL patient-reported outcomes (NIVO+chemo, n = 693; chemo, n = 666), BL scores for FACT-Ga total were similar between treatment groups. Least squares mean differences from BL favored NIVO+chemo at most visits for EQ-5D, FACT-Ga total, and Gastric Cancer Subscale (GaCS), and were comparable for other subscales (not shown). TTI generally favored NIVO+chemo (most HR > 1) but was not significantly different between arms. TTSD was longer in NIVO+chemo arm compared with chemo alone (all HRs < 1), except for Emotional Well-Being (WB); only GaCS and FACT-Ga total were significantly different between arms. TuDD showed statistically significant delays in deterioration (HR with CI < 1) for all scores expect Social WB. Conclusions: Compared with chemo alone, the addition of NIVO to chemo maintained HRQoL with a decreased risk of symptom deterioration in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC. Together with improved OS, these data support NIVO+chemo as a new 1L standard treatment for GC/GEJC/EAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116. [Table: see text]

POS1060 A PROSPECTIVE, LONGITUDINAL STUDY TO EVALUATE REAL-WORLD PATIENT EXPERIENCES AND TREATMENT SATISFACTION WITH SECUKINUMAB FOR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory disease that impairs quality of life. Despite therapeutic advances, up to a third of patients do not respond or are unable to sustain a treatment response. Thus, data on patient treatment experience in PsA is critical.

Objectives:

To assess real-world experiences of patients with PsA treated with secukinumab.

Methods:

This is an ongoing 12-month, prospective, longitudinal, web-based survey study of patients with PsA initiating secukinumab. Patient demographics and medical history are collected at baseline using a rheumatologist case report form. Patient experience data are collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months by patient surveys. The primary endpoint is change in the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item questionnaire (PsAID12) from baseline to 3 months. In addition, this study will explore other changes at 3 months, including PsA symptoms, treatment satisfaction with secukinumab, and other patient-reported outcome measures. Baseline and available month 3 data from patients enrolled to date were analyzed descriptively.

Results:

Baseline demographic and medical history data were available for 72 patients; 32 (44.4%) were male, 59 (81.9%) were White, and 15 (20.8%) reported modifying their diet because of PsA. The mean (SD) time since symptom onset (n = 29) and since PsA diagnosis (n = 53) was 56.3 (45.6) and 34.4 (44.7) months, respectively. More than half of the patients who started treatment with secukinumab were biologic experienced (38/62; 61.3%). Primary and secondary loss of effectiveness were the main reasons for previous biologic discontinuation (Table 1). At 3 months (n = 49), the mean (SD) PsAID12 change from baseline was –1.8 (1.8) points. Additionally, 24.5% of patients reported their PsA symptoms to be “much better,” 40.8% reported “moderately better,” and 32.7% “a little better” compared with baseline; none reported “no change” or worsened symptoms. On a scale of 1-10, patients rated their overall satisfaction with secukinumab treatment at month 3 with a mean (SD) score of 6.8 (2.1). Patients were also highly satisfied with their symptom improvement, speed to symptom improvement, and the mode and frequency of secukinumab administration (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of Prior PsA Treatment and Treatment Satisfaction with Secukinumab at Month 3

Physician-reported treatment characteristicsBaseline measure(N = 62)Most recent PsA biologic prior to secukinumab, n (%)n = 31Adalimumab12 (38.7)Certolizumab pegol8 (25.8)Etanercept6 (19.4)Infliximab, including -dyyb3 (9.7)Golimumab1 (3.2)Unknown/not sure1 (3.2)Primary reasons for discontinuing previous PsA biologic treatment, n (%)an = 30Primary and secondary loss of effectiveness25 (83.3)Disease progression6 (20.0)Worsening of or new comorbidities1 (3.3)How the medication was taken2 (6.7)Adverse effects/intolerance4 (13.3)Otherb1 (3.3)Patient-reported treatment satisfaction with secukinumab, mean (SD)cMonth 3 (N = 49)Symptom improvement6.7 (2.3)Speed of symptom improvement6.9 (2.0)Dose frequency7.4 (1.9)cMethod of administration7.2 (1.5)Ease of use8.2 (1.5)Side effects, if any7.9 (1.9)Patient support services by manufacturer8.3 (1.7)

PsA, psoriatic arthritis.

a Rheumatologists may list > 1 reason. Data tabulated based on the number of case report forms received from rheumatologists at analysis cutoff (n = 30).

b Other reasons included availability of new treatment, patient request, or family history of disease.

c n = 48.

Conclusion:

Most patients were biologic experienced and reported primary or secondary loss of effectiveness as the main reason for discontinuation of their previous biologic. Patients reported overall symptom improvement and satisfaction with secukinumab treatment at 3 months after initiation.

Disclosure of Interests:

M Elaine Husni Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Eli Lilly, UCB, and Regeneron, Michael Bozyczko Employee of: National Psoriasis Foundation, Daniel Wolin Employee of: RTI Health Solutions, Carolyn Sweeney Employee of: RTI Health Solutions, Eric Davenport Employee of: RTI Health Solutions, Steven Hass Employee of: Novartis, Esther Yi Employee of: Novartis, Peter Hur Employee of: Novartis, Linda Grinnell-Merrick Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen (previously Celgene), Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC): Interim results of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (N+C) versus (C) from CheckMate 649

4066

Background: CheckMate 649 (NCT02872116) is a randomized, open label phase 3 study in first line (1L) GC/GEJC/EAC. Prespecified interim results showed statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for N+C vs C in all randomized pts and pts whose tumors expressed programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. We present interim HRQOL results for CPS ≥ 5 pts, included as exploratory in the study. Methods: HRQOL was assessed using EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gastric Cancer (FACT-Ga). Assessments were performed at baseline (BL), every 6 weeks during treatment, and during follow-up. Change from BL EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Utility Index (UI) and FACT-Ga scores were analyzed using mixed models. Time to first symptom deterioration (TTSD), time until definitive deterioration (TuDD), and time to improvement (TTI) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier estimators and stratified Cox models; deterioration/improvement was based on prespecified meaningful change thresholds. Results: 1,581 pts were randomized to N+C (n = 789) and C (n = 792); of those, 955 pts had CPS ≥ 5 (N+C [n = 473] and C [n = 482]). Among 821 pts with BL and post BL PROs (N+C [n = 421] and C [n = 400]), BL scores for FACT-Ga total were similar for N+C and C. Least-squares mean differences from BL favored N+C at most visits for EQ-5D and FACT-Ga total and GaCS, and were comparable for other FACT subscales (data not shown). TTI largely favored N+C (most hazard ratios (HR) > 1) but was not significantly different between treatments. For TTSD, pts treated with N+C had decreased risk of deterioration (HR < 1) in EQ-5D UI, FACT-Ga total, and GaCS. TuDD showed statistically significant delays in deterioration (HR with confidence intervals [CI] < 1) for all scores. Conclusions: Pts with 1L GC/GEJC/EAC experienced better HRQOL with N+C compared with C alone. Change from BL in EQ-5D and FACT-Ga total and GaCS favored N+C at most visits. N+C decreased deterioration risk compared to C with OS and PFS improvement, suggesting favorable benefits in 1L GC/GEJC/EAC pts with CPS ≥ 5. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116. [Table: see text]

Understanding Barriers in the Pathway to Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results From a US Survey of 1690 Physicians From 10 Specialties

Objective

Early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) remains challenging because of the high prevalence of chronic back pain in patients initially treated by nonrheumatology health care providers (HCPs). We assessed the patient pathway to rheumatology referral, including HCP recognition of inflammatory back pain (IBP) and other features suggestive of AS, diagnostic workup, treatment, and referral to a specialist with the goal of identifying barriers to patient referral to a rheumatologist.

Methods

US HCPs from 10 specialties were invited to participate in a cross‐sectional web‐based survey on clinical characteristics and diagnostic measures leading to IBP suspicion and the subsequent referral process. Eligible HCPs were actively practicing and had referred a patient with suspected IBP or ocular findings (ophthalmology only) within 12 months. Data were analyzed descriptively.

Results

Of 1690 HCPs, 61% identified morning stiffness lasting more than 30 minutes, 29% sleep disturbance due to back pain, and 28% pain that improves with activity as features suggestive of IBP. Nearly two‐thirds of primary care HCPs reported that they were the first HCPs consulted by patients with suspected IBP. Among HCPs ordering diagnostic blood work, approximately 90% selected antinuclear antibody and rheumatoid factor, whereas 76% selected human leukocyte antigen B27. Almost 40% would treat patients with suspected IBP themselves. HCPs cited lack of adequate specialists nearby (35.1%), insurance restrictions (47.1%), and long wait time (77.0%) as barriers to early referral.

Conclusion

Most HCPs had difficulty identifying features suggestive of IBP and indicated insurance restrictions and long wait times as barriers to early referral of patients with potential AS.

P0037POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS ACROSS AN EXPANDED POOLED DATABASE OF MULTIPLE AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE CLINICAL STUDIES

Background and Aims

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease and the fourth-leading cause of kidney failure. Over the past two decades, various studies have been conducted to characterize the natural history of ADPKD and investigate impacts of potential treatments on disease progression. Previously, we created a pooled longitudinal database of unique subjects from nine studies to evaluate and analyze outcomes. The database was expanded to include data from two recent tolvaptan (TOL) trials (156-13-210 and 156-13-211). Here, we describe the baseline characteristics of the expanded pooled population.

Method

Data from 11 ADPKD studies (from 2001 to 2018, sponsored by Otsuka or National Institutes of Health) were combined and divided into two groups: TOL and standard of care (SOC). TOL consisted of trial subjects initiating treatment in one of seven trials (156-04-250, 156-04-251, 156-06-260, 156-09-284, 156-09-290, 156-08-271, and 156-13-210); SOC included subjects from placebo arms of two TOL randomized trials (156-04-251 and 156-09-290), all standard blood pressure control arms in the HALT-PKD trials, and subjects from two observational studies (156-10-291 and CRISP). Subjects in the placebo arm of study 156-13-210 received TOL for 5 weeks before randomization and were therefore included in the TOL group. Eligible subjects who completed an early TOL study continued TOL treatment in the extension study 156-08-271 and/or in a second extension study 156-13-211. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated in all studies using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Total kidney volume (TKV) was measured by magnetic resonance imaging and available in all studies except 156-13-210, 156-13-211, and HALT-PKD study B.

Results

The pooled analysis included 7,117 eligible subjects (TOL: 2,928; SOC: 4,189) from the United States (47.5%) and other countries. The two cohorts had similar age (mean age, 43.6 vs. 44.1 years) and sex distribution (50.5% male vs. 45.2% male). The TOL group had more white subjects (90.5% vs. 80.7%) and fewer Hispanic subjects (4.0% vs. 12.6%), a lower baseline mean eGFR (60 vs. 70 mL/min/1.73 m2), more in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 or above (58.1% vs. 41.0%), and more frequent history of signs of rapid disease progression (e.g., nephrolithiasis, hematuria, urinary tract infection). Among 4,917 subjects with TKV assessments, mean baseline TKV was higher in the TOL group (1,817 mL) compared with SOC (1,627 mL).

Conclusion

In this large, longitudinal database of unique subjects with ADPKD, distinct differences exist in some baseline characteristics of the TOL and SOC groups. Compared with the previous database, the expanded database doubled the size of the TOL group and included more subjects who were older and with advanced chronic kidney disease stage. This database provides a diverse ADPKD population to assess outcomes.

SO093LONGITUDINAL DATA ON TREATMENT DURATION AND COMPLIANCE FROM AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE CLINICAL TRIALS WITH TOLVAPTAN

Background and Aims : Observation of impactful clinical outcomes in a clinical trial setting for ADPKD is challenging due to the life-long progressive nature of ADPKD and longer-term associated outcomes of interest in this population (e.g., renal function decline, cardiovascular events, and mortality). Since 2004, the tolvaptan (TOL) clinical trial program enrolled subjects in multiple clinical studies with the opportunity to enroll in subsequent clinical trials for treatment and outcomes evaluation.

Method : Data from 6 ADPKD studies (protocols 156-04-250, 156-04-251, 156-06-260, 156-09-284, 156-09-290, 156-08-271) were pooled and evaluated over time for overall treatment duration, treatment time, and treatment gaps. Treatment duration for the individual clinical trials ranged from 1 week to up to 3 years.

Results : Overall, 1,437 subjects received TOL in these ADPKD clinical trials. For these subjects, the mean overall treatment duration was 4.1 years (3.8 years on treatment) with a maximum of 9.7 years (9.0 years on treatment). In this cohort, 513 subjects (35.7%) received TOL treatment for more than 5 years. Mean treatment compliance was 94.1%. Overall, 723 subjects (50.3%) received TOL treatment in ≥2 trials, with a median treatment gap duration between trials of 0.1 years (maximum, 5.6 years). At least 7 years of follow-up data are available for estimated glomerular filtration rate in 241 subjects (mean at baseline, 78.6 mL/min/1.73m2) and for total kidney volume in 130 subjects (mean at baseline, 1,816.9 mL).

Conclusion : This analysis provides longitudinal follow-up over an extended timeframe in a large number of subjects treated with TOL, with the greatest number of subjects being enrolled in clinical trials enriched for rapidly progressing ADPKD. Treatment compliance over years was reasonably good despite treatment gaps.

Evaluation of the Feasibility of a Web-Based Survey to Assess Patient-Reported Symptom Improvement and Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Secukinumab

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patient perspectives regarding treatment experience and satisfaction may be useful for clinicians when making treatment strategies. This US-based study assessed the feasibility of evaluating real-world, patient-reported narratives regarding symptom improvement and treatment satisfaction among patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with secukinumab.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, web-based survey collected data on demographics, disease characteristics, symptoms before and after secukinumab use, and treatment satisfaction with secukinumab.

RESULTS

Of 2755 patients screened, 200 patients with psoriatic arthritis were eligible and included in the analysis. Their mean age was 36.0 (standard deviation, 10.0) years; 55.5% were male and 75.0% were white. Most (87.5%) were biologic experienced; the primary reason for discontinuation of their previous treatment was lack of effectiveness (28.6%). Most patients (79.9%) reported overall psoriatic arthritis symptom improvement after secukinumab initiation compared with before secukinumab initiation; a similar trend was observed for all individual symptoms evaluated. Approximately half of patients reported improvement within 4 weeks after starting secukinumab treatment, and > 90% reported improvement within 6 months. Most patients (≥ 96%) expressed overall satisfaction with secukinumab regarding symptom improvement, speed of symptom improvement, frequency of administration, method of administration, ease of use, patient support services, and side effects, if any.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported perspectives may be feasibly collected to provide insights into treatment experience and satisfaction of secukinumab. Most patients with psoriatic arthritis in our real-world study experienced symptom improvement after initiating secukinumab; > 50% of patients reported symptom improvement within 4 weeks. Additionally, almost all patients reported satisfaction with secukinumab treatment.

Patient-reported outcomes from two global multicenter clinical trials of children and adults with tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion cancer receiving larotrectinib

6602

Background: TRK fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 occur in diverse tumor types in children and adults. Larotrectinib, a selective TRK inhibitor, was recently approved by the FDA based on high objective response rates, durable disease control, and a favorable toxicity profile in in patients with tumors harboring TRK fusions (Drilon et al, NEJM 2018; Laetsch et al, Lancet Oncol 2018). To explore the impact of larotrectinib on quality of life (QoL), patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reported here for pediatric patients (SCOUT; NCT02637687) and adolescents and adults (NAVIGATE; NCT02576431). Methods: Patients completed questionnaires assessing QoL (i.e., PedsQL, FACES, EORTC QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L) at baseline and planned cycle visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, longitudinal data models, and graphical displays. Results: As of July 2017, 37 patients (13 pediatric and 24 adolescent or adult) completed questionnaires at baseline and had at least one post-baseline measurement. Improvements compared to baseline in PROs were seen in both groups of patients in all functional domains of the PedsQL (physical, emotional, social, and school) and of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social). Number of patients with MID-improvement for PedsQL (Total Score), EORTC QLQ-C30 (Global Health Score), and EQ-5D-5L (VAS) are presented in the table below. Improvements were rapid (by cycle 3 or 5), seen across most tumor types and sustained a minimum of 2 cycles. Conclusions: Although necessarily viewed with caution due to relatively small sample sizes, these results nonetheless show a meaningful early improvement in QoL in pediatric and adult patients with TRK fusion cancer treated with larotrectinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02637687 and NCT02576431. [Table: see text]

A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of a Web-Based Survey to Examine Patient-Reported Symptoms and Satisfaction in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Receiving Secukinumab

Purpose

This real-world study evaluated the feasibility of assessing patient-reported symptom improvement and treatment satisfaction using a web-based survey among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with secukinumab.

Methods

This cross-sectional, web-based survey collected data on demographics, symptoms, treatment history, and treatment satisfaction from US patients with AS who were receiving secukinumab at survey participation. Patients reported AS symptoms experienced before and after secukinumab initiation, time to symptom improvement, and satisfaction with secukinumab treatment.

Results

Of 2755 patients screened, 200 with AS were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age of patients was 34.4 (10.6) years; 86.5% were biologic experienced. Most (74.0%) reported overall improvement (“a little,” “moderately,” or “much better”) in AS symptoms since secukinumab initiation compared with before secukinumab initiation; a similar trend was observed for all the individual symptoms analyzed (pain disrupting sleep, fatigue, morning stiffness, pain and stiffness in lower back or neck, sore areas other than joints, and ankle or heel pain [indicating enthesitis]). Approximately 41.9% of patients reported overall symptom improvement within 4 weeks of secukinumab treatment. Most expressed overall satisfaction (“very,” “mostly,” or “somewhat satisfied”) with secukinumab regarding symptom improvement (99.0%), speed of symptom improvement (97.0%), frequency and method of administration (96.0% and 91.5%, respectively), ease of use (93.5%), patient support services (97.0%), and side effects, if any (93.0%).

Conclusion

Most patients reported overall symptom improvement and satisfaction with treatment. Our study indicates that patient-reported perspectives may be feasibly collected using a web-based survey to provide insights into treatment experience and satisfaction.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-019-0154-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Overseas Registration Examination of the General Dental Council

The Overseas Registration Examination is a route to entry to the UK Dentists Register for dentists who have qualified outside the European Economic Area. The role of the examination is to protect the public by ensuring that such dentists meet minimum standards of competence. Candidates invest considerable time and resource in attempting the examination. For these reasons it is essential that the examination is both robust and fair. This paper describes the fundamental principles of assessment underpinning the design of the examination and the steps taken by the General Dental Council's ORE Advisory Group to assure its ongoing quality.

Secukinumab demonstrates greater sustained improvements in daily activities and personal relationships than ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from the CLEAR study

Background

Psoriasis can greatly impact patients’ lives by influencing clothing worn as well as by impairing sexual functioning. Secukinumab, a human monoclonal antibody selectively neutralizing interleukin‐17A, has demonstrated good efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis with a rapid onset of action and sustained response.

Objective

This analysis using the CLEAR study, a phase 3b double‐blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of secukinumab vs. ustekinumab in adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis, evaluated the treatment effects on patient's daily activities and personal relationships.

Methods

Impact on daily activities (interference with home/shopping/garden, and influence on clothes worn) and impact on personal relationships (problems with partner/others, and sexual difficulties) as well as their corresponding subscales were selected from the Dermatology Life Quality Index scale and evaluated for patients treated with secukinumab vs. ustekinumab from the CLEAR study. Treatment differences in mean scores and proportions of responders (score = 0, indicating no impact) were evaluated through 52 weeks. Time to response was evaluated through Week 16.

Results

Significant differences between secukinumab and ustekinumab were observed for daily activities and personal relationships at Week 16 and sustained through Week 52 (Week 52 response rates for daily activities: 82.9% vs. 73.5%, including interference with home/shopping/garden: 88.5% vs. 78.2%, and influence on clothes worn: 85.6% vs. 74.4%; personal relationships: 86.1% vs. 73.7%, including problems with partner/others: 86.6% vs. 74.8%, and sexual difficulties: 88.5% vs. 74.3%; all P < 0.01). The median time to response was 4 weeks for secukinumab vs. 8 weeks for ustekinumab for daily activities and personal relationships (both P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Secukinumab treatment helps patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis have a more normal life faster when compared to ustekinumab, by providing greater and sustained improvement in clothing choice and sexual functioning.

Treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients taking empagliflozin compared with patients taking glimepiride

Purpose

This exploratory analysis assessed and compared patients’ treatment satisfaction with empagliflozin plus metformin versus glimepiride plus metformin, using data obtained from the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, status version (DTSQs) collected in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial.

Methods

Observed values for DTSQs scale score and each of its eight items were summarized by visit and treatment arm. Changes from baseline in these scores were analyzed using linear mixed models for repeated measures.

Results

The baseline scale score and item scores were comparable between empagliflozin plus metformin (n = 765) and glimepiride plus metformin (n = 780). Compared with baseline, patients reported significant treatment satisfaction increases and significant decreases in perceived hyperglycemia with both treatments at all visits. Also, compared with baseline, a significant increase in perceived frequency of hypoglycemia was observed in the glimepiride treatment group at all visits. No statistically significant treatment difference was observed in DTSQs scale score and its items at week 104. The difference between the treatment groups was significant and in favor of empagliflozin from week 28 onward for perceived frequency of hyperglycemia (P ≤ 0.006) and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia (P ≤ 0.011).

Conclusions

Despite positive trends in favor of empagliflozin, there was no significant difference in DTSQs scale score between empagliflozin and glimepiride at 104 weeks. However, when compared with glimepiride, empagliflozin demonstrated significantly lower perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia at all visits from week 28 onward. This finding is consistent with the clinical results reported for the EMPA-REG H2H-SU trial.

Assessment of trace elements and legacy contaminant concentrations in California mussels (Mytilus spp.): relationship to land use and outfalls

NOAA's Mussel Watch Program funded a regional pilot project in California that characterized contaminants associated with various land uses in conjunction with state, federal and private partners. Herein we assess the magnitude and distribution of trace elements and persistent organic contaminants in indigenous mussels with respect to land use, presence of outfalls and a subset of California Areas of Special Biological Significance (ASBS). We detected significant differences among the land use categories for the majority of trace elements and legacy contaminants measured. There was no significant difference between sites with and without outfalls. PCBs and PAHs were significantly lower in sites within ASBS boundary compared to other sites. The findings of this study will help fine tune future regional and national assessments as well as guide development of resource management and remediation activities and programs.

Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is not required in up to 64% of patients who adopt a wait-and-see policy after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones. Although reports of retrospective cohort series have shown a higher mortality among patients who defer cholecystectomy, it is not known if this is due to the patients' premorbid health status or due to the deferral of cholecystectomy. Randomised clinical trials of prophylactic cholecystectomy versus wait-and-see have not had sufficient power to demonstrate differences in survival.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of cholecystectomy deferral (wait-and-see) versus elective (prophylactic) cholecystectomy in patients who have had an endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966 to 2007), EMBASE (1980 to 2007), and Science Citation Index Expanded without language restrictions until April 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing patients whose gallbladder was left in-situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy (wait-and-see group) versus patients who had cholecystectomy with either endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration (prophylactic cholecystectomy group), irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the impact of a wait-and-see policy on mortality. Secondary outcomes assessed were the incidence of biliary pain, cholangitis, pancreatitis, need for cholangiography, need for cholecystectomy, and the rate of difficult cholecystectomy. We pooled data using relative risk with fixed-effect and random-effects models.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 5 randomised trials with 662 participants out of 93 publications identified through the literature searches. The number of deaths was 47 in the wait-and-see group (334 patients) compared to 26 in the prophylactic cholecystectomy group (328 patients) for a 78% increased risk of mortality (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.75, P = 0.010). The survival benefit of prophylactic cholecystectomy was independent of trial design, inclusion of high risk patients or inclusion of any one of the five trials. Patients in the wait-and-see group had higher rates of recurrent biliary pain (RR 14.56, 95% CI 4.95 to 42.78, P < 00001), jaundice or cholangitis (RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.09 to 5.87, P = 0.03), and of repeat ERCP or other forms of cholangiography (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.29 to 4.32, P = 0.005). Cholecystectomy was eventually performed in 35% (115 patients) of the wait-and-see group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic cholecystectomy should be offered to patients whose gallbladders remain in-situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and common bile duct clearance.

Proteinase-activated receptor-2-mediated activation of stress-activated protein kinases and inhibitory kappa B kinases in NCTC 2544 keratinocytes

In this study we examined the regulation of the stress-activated protein (SAP) kinases and inhibitory kappa B kinases (IKKs) through stimulation of the novel G-protein-coupled receptor proteinase-activated receptor-2 in the human keratinocyte cell line NCTC2544. Trypsin and the peptide SLIGKV stimulated a time-dependent increase in both c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Trypsin also stimulated NF kappa B-DNA binding and the activation of the upstream kinases IKK alpha and -beta. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate also strongly activated both SAP kinases and IKK isoforms, suggesting the potential for a protein kinase C-mediated regulatory mechanism underlying the effects of trypsin. Pre-incubation with selective protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors GF109203X and Gö6983, or transfection of dominant negative (DN)-PKC alpha, abolished phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-mediated c-Jun N-terminal kinase activity, although it only partially inhibited the response to trypsin. In contrast, Gö6983 reduced trypsin-stimulated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity to a greater extent than GF109203X, although DN-PKC alpha or PKC zeta had no substantial effect. Additionally, inhibitors of PKC partially reduced trypsin-stimulated IKK alpha activity but abolished that of IKK beta, whereas DN-PKC alpha but not DN-PKC zeta substantially reduced trypsin-stimulated Flag-IKK beta activity. This study shows for the first time proteinase-activated receptor-2-mediated stimulation of both SAP kinase and IKK signaling and differing roles for PKC isoforms in the regulation of each pathway.

The relationships between premilitary school record data and risk for posttraumatic stress disorder among Vietnam war veterans

The purpose of this study was to determine whether Vietnam veterans' risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was correlated with their premilitary school performance. The authors compared both primary and secondary school record data on hospitalized chemically dependent PTSD patients with those of both non-PTSD, chemically dependent and community controls. All participants were male Vietnam war combat veterans. The comparisons were made with MANCOVA analyses with the effects of combat and age differences between groups controlled. For the most part, primary-school grade point average, absenteeism, and tardiness data on three groups did not differ significantly. However, the mean secondary school grade points of the future PTSD patients were generally substantially lower than those of controls. Additionally, more secondary school absenteeism and tardiness were reported among future PTSD patients than in the controls. The groups did not differ significantly on number of extracurricular activities. Academic weakness, absenteeism, and tardiness in secondary school appear to be moderately strong predictors of vulnerability to PTSD after traumatization. It also supports the claim that chronic PTSD is, in part, the result of weaknesses present before exposure to trauma.

Measurement of moral development in medicine

The past two decades have been a time of heightened interest in the moral aspects of the practice of medicine. This interest has been reflected in medical education by the establishment of medical humanities programs in both preclinical and clinical education in many medical schools. It has also been reflected in the literature with a dramatic increase in journal articles on medical ethics as well as the development of medical ethics in textbooks. A number of journals have developed that are specifically devoted to medical ethics, including The Journal of Medical Ethics, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, The Journal of Medical Humanities, Theoretical Medicine, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, just to name a few. The literature includes both theoretical foundations and conceptual analyses of particular issues as well as practical advice and general suggestions for how to implement programs in medical humanities.