The role of psychosis and clozapine load in excessive checking in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: longitudinal observational study

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of people with clozapine-treated schizophrenia develop 'checking' compulsions, a phenomenon yet to be understood.

AIMS

To use habit formation models developed in cognitive neuroscience to investigate the dynamic interplay between psychosis, clozapine dose and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS).

METHOD

Using the anonymised electronic records of a cohort of clozapine-treated patients, including longitudinal assessments of OCS and psychosis, we performed longitudinal multi-level mediation and multi-level moderation analyses to explore associations of psychosis with obsessiveness and excessive checking. Classic bivariate correlation tests were used to assess clozapine load and checking compulsions. The influence of specific genetic variants was tested in a subsample.

RESULTS

A total of 196 clozapine-treated individuals and 459 face-to-face assessments were included. We found significant OCS to be common (37.9%), with checking being the most prevalent symptom. In mediation models, psychosis severity mediated checking behaviour indirectly by inducing obsessions (r = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04-0.09; P < 0.001). No direct effect of psychosis on checking was identified (r = -0.28, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.03; P = 0.340). After psychosis remission (n = 65), checking compulsions correlated with both clozapine plasma levels (r = 0.35; P = 0.004) and dose (r = 0.38; P = 0.002). None of the glutamatergic and serotonergic genetic variants were found to moderate the effect of psychosis on obsession and compulsion (SLC6A4, SLC1A1 and HTR2C) survived the multiple comparisons correction.

CONCLUSIONS

We elucidated different phases of the complex interplay of psychosis and compulsions, which may inform clinicians' therapeutic decisions.

Advances in Cryopreservatives: Exploring Safer Alternatives

Cryopreservation of cells, tissues, and organs is widely used in the biomedical and research world. There are different cryopreservatives that are used for this process; however, many of them, such as DMSO, are used despite the problems they present, mainly due to the toxicity it presents to certain types of samples. The aim of this Review is to highlight the different types of substances used in the cryopreservation process. It has been shown that some of these substances are well-known, as in the case of the families of alcohols, sugars, sulfoxides, etc. However, in recent years, other compounds have appeared, such as ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, or certain polymers, which open the door to new cryopreservation methods and are also less toxic to frozen samples.

Retrospective pharmacogenetic study in a cohort of pediatric tuberous sclerosis complex patients using everolimus

Aim: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare disease that produces multisystemic disorders. Everolimus (EVR) is the only immunosuppressive drug approved to control the symptoms and progression of the disease. The aim was to evaluate the genotype-phenotype association to improve the pediatric TSC pharmacotherapeutic outcome. Patients & methods: Ten pediatric TSC patients were recruited. Concomitant treatment and main metabolic enzymes and transporter coding gene variants of EVR were analyzed. Results: Significant associations were found between CYP3A4*22 allele and concomitant treatment with valproic acid (CYP3A4-inhibitor) with a poor metabolizer phenotype and the presence of pneumonia. Conclusion: This is the first pharmacogenetic study of EVR in pediatric TSC patients. The authors propose to consider concomitant treatment and pharmacogenetics due to their multifactorial status.

Importance of Pharmacogenetics and Drug-Drug Interactions in a Kidney Transplanted Patient

Tacrolimus (TAC) is a narrow-therapeutic-range immunosuppressant drug used after organ transplantation. A therapeutic failure is possible if drug levels are not within the therapeutic range after the first year of treatment. Pharmacogenetic variants and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are involved. We describe a patient case of a young man (16 years old) with a renal transplant receiving therapy including TAC, mycophenolic acid (MFA), prednisone and omeprazole for prophylaxis of gastric and duodenal ulceration. The patient showed great fluctuation in TAC blood concentration/oral dose ratio, as well as pharmacotherapy adverse effects (AEs) and frequent diarrhea episodes. Additionally, decreased kidney function was found. A pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, including pharmacogenetic analysis, was carried out. The selection of the genes studied was based on the previous literature (CYP3A5, CYP3A4, POR, ABCB1, PXR and CYP2C19). A drug interaction with omeprazole was reported and the nephrologist switched to rabeprazole. A lower TAC concentration/dose ratio was achieved, and the patient's condition improved. In addition, the TTT haplotype of ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) and Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) gene variants seemed to affect TAC pharmacotherapy in the studied patient and could explain the occurrence of long-term adverse effects post-transplantation. These findings suggest that polymorphic variants and co-treatments must be considered in order to achieve the effectiveness of the immunosuppressive therapy with TAC, especially when polymedicated patients are involved. Moreover, pharmacogenetics could influence the drug concentration at the cellular level, both in lymphocyte and in renal tissue, and should be explored in future studies.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between clozapine and valproic acid in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: Does UGT polymorphism affect these drug interactions?

The combination of valproic acid (VPA) and clozapine (CLZ) is regularly prescribed for augmentation therapy in treatment resistant schizophrenia. The VPA has been shown to reduce norclozapine (NCLZ) plasma levels, but the mechanism of this interaction remains unknown. The aim of this study is to examine the differences between patients treated with CLZ and patients treated with CLZ plus VPA. For it, various factors have been evaluated. The study was based on plasma samples from CLZ and CLZ plus VPA treated patients (n = 61) subjected to routine therapeutic drug monitoring considering clinical data, smoking status, daily dose of CLZ and VPA, concomitant medications, albumin, and renal and hepatic function. Genotyping of polymorphisms of CYP1A2, CYP3A4/5, CYP2C19, ABCB1, UGT2B10 and CYP2C19 were performed by real time PCR. CYP2D6 were genotyped using competitive allele-specific PCR and by a long PCR based method. Plasma CLZ and NCLZ concentrations were measured by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem masses (LC-MS/MS) and plasma VPA by Ultraviolet-Visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometric immunoassay. The patients presented adequate CLZ levels in relation to the dose. However, NCLZ levels were excessively low and the CLZ/NCLZ ratio very high. Patients with UGT2B10 GT (rs61750900) genotype showed lower NCLZ plasma levels and C/D NCLZ, and higher CLZ/NCLZ ratio versus patients with UGT2B10 GG genotype. VPA, smoking, the presence of UGT2B10 GT genotype and having low albumin levels indicate that the CLZ/NCLZ ratio is affected, mostly coinciding with decreased NCLZ levels and possibly with an increased risk of neutropenia.

Exploring the usefulness of plasma level determination and pharmacogenetics for patients treated with clozapine

Aims: The aims of the present study were to assess the variance of plasma clozapine (CLZ) levels and to identify the influence of sociodemographic and pharmacogenetic factors on it and to introduce these tools in a clinical setting. Patients & methods: CLZ concentration was measured and genetic variants of CLZ pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors were assessed in 23 patients with psychotic disorders. Results: A significant association between mean concentration/dose ratio (C/D) and smoking status, age and weight were found. There was a significant difference in mean plasma CLZ levels and gender. The rs762551 AA genotype in smokers had a significantly lower C/D. Conclusion: In addition to classical factors, monitoring of plasma concentrations together with pharmacogenetics led to greater individualization of treatment.

Implementation of pharmacogenetics in a clozapine treatment resistant patient: a case report

We report the case of a young Caucasian male with disorganized chronic schizophrenia, an active smoker and nonresponder to 400 mg of clozapine/day. Therapeutic clozapine monitoring was analyzed revealing a low clozapine:norclozapine ratio. An additional pharmacogenetic test was carried out showing that the patient carried *1F variant ( CYP1A2 gene), which has been associated with nonresponse to clozapine in smoker patients. A genetic variation in the SLC6A4 gene was also found, which could be related to the poor response to clozapine. The remainder of the genes analyzed ( CYP2D6, ABCB1 and HTR2A) were not directly associated with the patient’s phenotype. The dose of clozapine was increased to 600 mg/day, reaching the therapeutic range. This case shows how pharmacogenetics can help in understanding the value of plasma levels to provide clinical improvement.

Can pharmacogenetics help patients under chronic treatment with coumarin anticoagulants?

Vitamin K antagonists are highly effective antithrombotic drugs. However, appropriate dosing is difficult to establish owing to its narrow therapeutic window as well as widespread inter- and intra-individual variability in dosage. Compared with dosing solely based on clinical information, pharmacogenetics can help improve the therapy with coumarins by decreasing the time to reach a stable dose and reducing the risk of bleeding. Most of the studies about genotyping of patients using vitamin K antagonists have focused on predicting the stable dose. Two genes have been shown to have the most influence on dosing: VKORC1 and CYP2C9. Furthermore, genotyping of more genes, such as CYP4F2 and APOE, is also being included in some dosing algorithms. The role of genotype beyond the initial dose-titration phase is less clear. Thus, a proven genetically determined risk of unstable dose or bleeding could help with the selection of patients who require more frequent monitoring of dose. On the other hand, patients who have a genetically determined stable dose could self-monitor their international normalized ratio (INR), making the therapy less expensive and more convenient.