Health-related quality of life, work productivity and costs related to patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Austria

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory-Bowel-Disease (IBD) is a lifelong illness with significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The disease-burden causes work productivity impairment, such as sick-leave and restriction of leisure time activities. From a societal perspective, productivity loss often contributes significantly to the total costs. The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of disease-burden on work productivity, daily activities, and HRQoL.

METHODS

We performed a survey among Austrian patients with IBD to assess general questions about demography and disease pattern, impaired work productivity and reduced daily activities using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire and HRQoL utilizing the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ). Associations were assessed employing linear regressions. The questionnaire was circulated by the Austrian Crohn's Disease/Ulcerative Colitis Association.

RESULTS

In total, 510 patients with median age of 40 years completed the questionnaire. Patients had a median disease-duration of 9 years, 46% were treated with biologics and 64% were employed. The median SIBDQ score was 45 (16-69). Patients in self-assessed remission (n = 319) and relapse (n = 96) differed by 18 points on the SIBDQ score (p value < 0.0001). Mean work productivity reduction amounted to 7 h 17 min (95% CI 6:05-8:29) during the last 7 days. Work absenteeism accounted for 4 h 28 min (95% CI 3:25-5:31) and reduced productivity at the workplace (presenteeism) for 2 h 49 min (95% CI 2:31-3:07). During a relapse, 12 h 9 min were lost (p value < 0.0001). Productivity reduction correlated with HRQoL (r = 0.3964). In total, 143 €per patient per week (95% CI 119-167) were lost (7,411 €per year). On average, patients lost 4 h (95% CI 3:44-4:16) of unpaid daily activities; 3 h 17 min the employed subgroup and 5 h 19 min the not employed.

CONCLUSION

IBD leads to a substantial burden of disease, which is associated with indirect costs for society related to work ability reduction. HRQoL significantly influences loss of work productivity. Improving HRQoL should be a key factor to reduce disease burden and societal costs.

Quality of Care Standards in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: a European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] Position Paper

The management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is complex, and requires tight control of disease activity, close monitoring to avoid treatment side effects, health care professionals with expertise in IBD, and an interdisciplinary, holistic approach. Despite various efforts to standardise structures, processes, and outcomes,1-8 and due to the high variability at the local, national, and international levels, there are still no clear definitions or outcome measures available to establish quality of care standards for IBD patients which are applicable in all contexts and all countries. For this reason, the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] supported the construction of a list of criteria summarising current standards of care in IBD. The list comprises 111 quality standard points grouped into three main domains [structure n = 31, process n = 42, outcomes n = 38] and is based on scientific evidence, interdisciplinary expert consensus, and patient-oriented perspectives. The list of proposed criteria is intended to represent the position of ECCO regarding the optimum quality of care that should be available to patients. Since health care systems and regulations vary considerably between countries, this list may require adaptation at local and national levels. It is recognised that not all these criteria that have been identified as optimal will be available in every unit. However, ECCO will continue its efforts to develop and coordinate projects and initiatives that will help to guarantee optimal quality of care for all IBD patients.

Abstract P3-09-04: Beyond CHEK2 in breast cancer: Search for additional moderately penetrant risk gene variants by analyzing the oligogenic disease course in CHEK2 mutation carriers

This abstract was not presented at the symposium.

Effects of Lipoprotein apheresis on the Lipoprotein(a) levels in the long run

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low density lipoprotein-like particle to which apolipoprotein(a) is bound. It is recognized as an atherosclerosis-inducing risk factor. Up to now a detailed description of the effect of Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on Lp(a) levels in the long run is lacking.

METHODS

We studied 59 patients with elevated Lp(a) levels who were treated with LA at the Lipoprotein Apheresis Center at the University Hospital Dresden. We analyzed Lp(a) concentrations before the start of the LA treatment and during this extracorporeal therapy.

RESULTS

Comparing the Lp(a) levels before the start of LA therapy and pre-apheresis (measured before the LA sessions) Lp(a) levels, we observed a reduction of the Lp(a) levels of about 22.8% in all patients. Lp(a) levels were acutely (comparing post-apheresis with pre-apheresis concentrations) reduced by all 6 available LA methods (by about 70%). A linear regression analysis was performed to differentiate the long term course of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels. In 30 patients we saw an increase of the pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time, in 15 patients a constancy and in 14 patients a decrease. Patients with a decrease of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time had significantly higher initial (before the start of the extracorporeal treatment) and pre-apheresis values and they were significantly older. These patients had significantly more severe peripheral arterial disease as well as cardiac valve and carotid stenosis. The patients with the lowest initial Lp(a) levels and an increase of the pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time had the highest percentage of intake of Tredaptive(®)/Niaspan(®) though after stopping the intake of these nicotinic acid preparations no clear increase of Lp(a) concentrations was observed. The applied LA systems did not seem to have a significant influence on the course of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels. In all patients there was a high variability of Lp(a) concentrations between LA sessions which may in part be due to the inaccuracy of the method used to measure Lp(a) concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels (before the LA sessions) are lower than those before the start of a LA treatment but they behave differently among patients during LA treatment.