Vectorized gene therapy of liver tumors: proof-of-concept of TG4023 (MVA-FCU1) in combination with flucytosine

Background

TG4023 is a modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) containing the yeast-originated transgene FCU1, expressing cytosine deaminase and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase enzymes that transform the prodrug flucytosine (5-FC) into cytotoxic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-fluorouridine-5′-monophosphate, respectively. This first-in-human study aimed to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intratumoral (IT) TG4023 and the safety, feasibility, and proof-of-concept (PoC) of TG4023/5-FC combination to deliver high 5-FU concentrations in tumors.

Patients and Methods

Cancer patients without further therapeutic option and with at least one injectable primary or metastatic liver tumor underwent on day 1 a percutaneous IT injection of TG4023 at doses of 107, 108, or 4.108 plaque forming units (p.f.u.) using ultrasound imaging guidance, after a dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)-driven 3 + 3 dose-escalating design. On day 2, patients were given intravenous and/or oral 5-FC at a dose of 200 mg/kg/day for 14 days and were followed for safety through day 43. Tumor response was assessed at week 6, according to RECIST. Plasma and tumor 5-FU concentrations were measured to establish the PoC.

Results

In total, 16 patients completed treatment with TG4023 and 5-FC. One DLT/7 patients (ALT/aspartate aminotransferase transient increase) was observed at 4 × 108 p.f.u.; MTD was therefore not reached. The most frequent adverse events were pyrexia, asthenia, vomiting, and decreased appetite. Eight of 16 patients had stable disease. Mean 5-FU concentrations in plasma were 1.9 ± 2.6 ng/ml and 56 ± 30 ng/g in tumors. Seroconversion for anti-FCU1 antibodies was found for one patient from each cohort (16%, overall).

Conclusions

This phase I study demonstrated that IT injections of TG4023 were feasible and well tolerated; MTD was defined as 4 × 108 p.f.u. Therapeutic 5-FU concentrations in tumors established the virus-directed enzyme-prodrug therapy PoC.

Clinicaltrials.gov Number

NCT00978107.

Treatment with Hizentra in patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: a real-life, non-interventional trial

Background

Although Hizentra is indicated for immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, phase III trials have focused on patients with primary immunodeficiencies. In this 9-month, real-life, prospective, non-interventional, longitudinal, multicenter study of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies in France, treatment modalities (primary endpoint), efficacy, safety, tolerability, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction were evaluated using descriptive statistics.

Results

Starting in January 2012, 117 patients were enrolled (99 adults, 18 children). Secondary immunodeficiencies were present in 48.7 % of patients. At follow-up, injections were administered every 7 days in 92.2 % of patients. Nine patients (7.8 %) were taking Hizentra every 10–14 days. The median dose of Hizentra administered was 0.1 g/kg/injection. Fifty-six patients were administered doses <0.1 g/kg/injection and 13 patients were administered doses >0.2 g/kg/injection. Mean trough IgG titers were 9.0 ± 3.3 g/L (median 8.3 g/L). The mean yearly rate of infection was 1.2 ± 1.9. Mean scores on the Short Form-36 physical and mental component summaries were 46.3 ± 10.0 and 46.6 ± 9.3, respectively. Scores on the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication ranged from 69.9 ± 19.9 to 88.3 ± 21.2 depending on the domain. Treatment with Hizentra was well tolerated. No single drug-related systemic reaction occurred in more than one patient and few local reactions were reported (n = 5).

Conclusions

Under real-life conditions and in a cohort that included patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, treatment with Hizentra was effective and well tolerated and patients were generally satisfied with the treatment.

French experience of patient management when receiving oral vinorelbine chemotherapy (NVBO) for metastatic breast cancer: Final results of a prospective observational survey on practices

e12013

Background: An observatory on practices has been implemented in France with the aim of investigating the correlation between patient (pt) profile and the use of an oral chemotherapy (OCT), NVBO. Methods and Materials: Three questionnaires were used: a “Physician” questionnaire (medical practice conditions, role of OCT), a “Patient” questionnaire (pt disease history, prescription selection factors and compliance), and a Patient Preference self-questionnaire (partly based on the EORTC QLQ-BR23). Results: Between February 06 and February 08,355 pts were enrolled in 47 centers. Breast tumours were classified as having limited aggressiveness with or without visceral metastasis (41.2%) or slowly progressing visceral metastasis and DFI>24 months (42.3%) or aggressive disease with visceral metastasis and DFI<12 months (16.5%). Pts had previously received hormonotherapy in 72.4%, iv CT in 78.6% and OCT in 31%. NVBO was prescribed as monotherapy in 53,6% and association in 46,4%, with iv in 35% (66.7% with trastuzumab), with oral in 65% ( 97.2% with capecitabine ). 86.2% of pts preferred OCT for 3 main reasons : more time with their family, social life maintained and treatment at home. Physicians’ major parameters of OCT choice according to score (1 to 4) were : patient-related factors (QOL 3.61), reduced hospital stays (2.99) and problems related to venous administration (2.62). Conclusion: NVBO brings added value in terms of pt convenience allowing improved QOL and reduced hospital stays while keeping optimal compliance to treatment schedule.

[Table: see text]

Cost consequences of adjuvant capecitabine, Mayo Clinic and de Gramont regimens for stage III colon cancer in the French setting

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare the cost consequences of oral capecitabine and two different intravenous regimens of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (de Gramont and Mayo Clinic regimens) as adjuvant therapy in stage III colon cancer in France.

METHODS

Clinical efficacy and safety data were taken from published clinical trials. Medical resource use was estimated from published data and expert opinion. Direct costs (drug acquisition, inpatient and home drug administration, laboratory tests, transportation, and management of adverse events) were considered over a time horizon of 46 months (3.8 years). The perspective taken was that of the French Sickness Funds.

RESULTS

In patients treated with capecitabine, relapse-free survival was 1.3 months longer than with the Mayo Clinic regimen, which has been shown to be as effective as the de Gramont regimen. In the base case analysis, capecitabine was less costly (3,654 EUR/patient) than the Mayo Clinic (10,481 EUR/ patient) and de Gramont (7,204 EUR/patient) regimens. In the sensitivity analysis, capecitabine remained dominant except when the intravenous regimens were assumed to be administered at home in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In France, capecitabine is more effective and less costly than both the Mayo Clinic and de Gramont regimens as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

Phase II study of UFT with leucovorin and irinotecan (TEGAFIRI): first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

This phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) combined with intravenous (i.v.) irinotecan every 3 weeks (TEGAFIRI) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients received oral UFT 250 mg m(-2) day(-1) and LV 90 mg day(-1) in three divided daily doses for 14 days followed by a 1-week rest and i.v. irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks. Tumour responses, assessed every two cycles using RECIST criteria, were reviewed by an independent review committee. In 52 evaluable patients, the best overall response rate was 33% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 20-47%; 1 complete and 16 partial responses). The median time to progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 3.02-7.52 months) and median overall survival was 14.9 months (11.73-17.97 months). A total of 307 cycles were administered, with a median number of five cycles per patient (range: 1-10). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (25% of patients), diarrhoea (22%), vomiting (11%) and anaemia (11%). The TEGAFIRI regimen is a feasible, well-tolerated and convenient treatment option for patients with non-resectable mCRC.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant capecitabine, Mayo Clinic and de Gramont regimens for stage III colon cancer in the French setting

13506

Background: The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is as effective but better tolerated than i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer. Costs associated with the administration route could vary widely according to national rules and medical practice. We compared costs and outcomes of capecitabine, the Mayo Clinic, and de Gramont regimens as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. Methods: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the three regimens using the third-party payer perspective, time horizon and efficacy/safety data (adjusted for indirect comparisons) from two published clinical trials [Twelves et al. N Engl J Med 2005; Andre et al. J Clin Oncol 2003]. The costs of chemotherapy and the treatment of side effects were estimated from the clinical trials and expert opinion. We applied French standard costs to resources consumed and evaluated cost-effectiveness using relapse-free survival (RFS), defined in X-ACT study, as an efficacy indicator. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed varying the cost estimates for each treatment. Results: Capecitabine-treated pts had a mean life duration increase without treatment failure of 1.3 months vs. Mayo (see table). De Gramont was considered as effective as Mayo. In the base-case analysis capecitabine appeared to be dominant, more effective and less costly than either Mayo Clinic or de Gramont. In the sensitivity analyses, capecitabine remained dominant except for the minimum costs scenario vs. de Gramont. In this case, the cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at 8997.55€ per year without relapse. Conclusions: As adjuvant treatment for colon cancer, capecitabine decreases medical resources consumed, mainly in hospitals. Its approval in this setting is expected to bring cost savings and better outcomes. [Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Multicentre phase II study of oxaliplatin as a single-agent in cisplatin/carboplatin +/- taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND

This multicentre phase II open-label study evaluated safety and antitumour activity of oxaliplatin in cisplatin or carboplatin (cis/carboplatin) +/- taxane-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg/M2 intravenously every 3 weeks, 94% having a performance status (PS) 0-1. All were pretreated with cis/carboplatin and 21 (44%) with paclitaxel. The median number of involved organs was two, 18 (38%) had liver metastasis, 23 (48%) were platinum-resistant and 14 (29%) were taxane-resistant. Forty-two patients were evaluable for a response, 18 (43%) were platinum-resistant and 11 (26%) were taxane-resistant.

RESULTS

A total of 253 cycles was administered (median: 5.5/patient). Median cumulative oxaliplatin dose was 666 mg/m2. National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria toxicity analysis showed that seven patients (15%) had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, two patients (4%) had grade 3 neutropenia, and one patient had grade 3 anaemia. Eleven patients (23%) experienced grade 3 neurosensory toxicity. Of the 29 patients with peripheral neuropathy at the end of treatment, 55% had recovered or improved 1 month later. Eleven objective responses (two complete) were obtained in the 42 evaluable patients [ORR 26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14% to 42%], with 10/24 (42%, 95% CI 22% to 63%) in platinum-sensitive, and 1 of 18 (5.6%, 95% CI 0% to 27%) in platinum-resistant patients. Median response duration was 9.2 months (95% CI 6.6% to 11.8%), and median progression-free and overall survival in all treated patients were 4.3 months (95% CI 3.0% to 5.7%) and 15.0 months (95% CI 11.1% to 18.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin has a good safety profile and is active in cis/carboplatin +/- paclitaxel-pretreated AOC patients.

Role of the CD34+ 38- cells in posttransplant hematopoietic recovery

Using three different statistical tests in parallel, we showed in a preliminary study that neither mononuclear cells, CD34+ 33+ or 33- cells, nor CD34+ 38+ cells significantly correlated with engraftment kinetics following autologous blood cell transplantation (ABCT). We additionally demonstrated here, in a series of patients suffering from malignant diseases, that the graft content in CD34+ 38- cells is individually a more sensitive indicator of the earliest, as well as the latest post-ABCT trilineage hematopoietic recovery than the colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage and even the total CD34+ cell content. This suggests that the CD34+ 38- cell population is itself subdivided into two more subsets, one being already lineage-committed and responsible for short-term engraftment, the other containing only very primitive hematopoietic cells responsible for sustained engraftment. Strong arguments favor the probability that these subsets correspond to HLA-DR+ and DR cells, respectively. We also defined an optimal threshold value of 0.05 x 10(6) CD34+ 38- cells/kg of the patient's body weight (b.w.) above which a rapid and sustained trilineage engraftment safely occurs. In fact, infusion of lower numbers of cells seems to have a more significant impact on long-term compared to short-term neutrophil recovery and on platelet kinetics engraftment. We additionally looked for the eventual influence on engraftment time of the type of disease, and of post-ABCT administration of hematopoietic growth factors (HGF). When the type of disease appeared to have no influence on the engraftment time, posttransplant HGF administration significantly reduced the time to trilineage engraftment in patients transplanted with < 0.05 x 10(6) CD34+ 38- cells, thus justifying it in case of reinfusion of low numbers of CD34+ 38- cells. On the other hand, the administration of HGF after infusion of more than 0.05 x 10(6) CD34+ 38- cells/kg b.w. did not hasten more, or only very little, the engraftment time, thus becoming not only unprofitable for the patients but costly as well.

Primordial role of CD34+ 38- cells in early and late trilineage haemopoietic engraftment after autologous blood cell transplantation

In order to better define which cell subset contained in graft products might be the most predictive of haemopoietic recovery following autologous blood cell transplantation (ABCT), the relationships between the amounts of reinfused mononuclear cells (MNC), CFU-GM, total CD34+ cells and their CD33 and CD38 subsets. and the successive stages of trilineage engraftment kinetics, were studied in 45 cancer patients, using the Spearman correlation test, a linear regression model and a log-inverse model. No relationship was found between the infused numbers of MNC, CD33+ and CD33- subsets observed and the numbers of days to reach predetermined absolute neutrophil (ANC), platelet and reticulocyte counts. The infused numbers of CFU-GM, CD34+ and CD34+ 38+ cells correlated inconstantly with haemopoietic recovery parameters. The strongest and the most constant correlations were significantly observed between the infused numbers of CD34+ 38- cells and each trilineage engraftment parameter. The log-inverse model determined a threshold dose of 0.05 x 10(6) (= 5 x 10(4)) CD34+ 38- cells/kg, below which the trilineage engraftment kinetics were significantly slower and unpredictable. Post-transplant TBI-conditioning regimens increased the low cell dose-related delay of engraftment kinetics whereas post-transplant administration of haemopoietic growth factors (HGF) seemed to abrogate this delay. This would justify clinical use of HGF only in patients transplanted with CD34+ 38- cell amounts lower than the proposed threshold value. This study suggests that the CD34+ 38- subpopulation, although essentially participating in late complete haemopoietic recovery, is also composed of committed progenitor cells involved in early trilineage engraftment.

5-Fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil plus alpha-interferon as treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. A randomized study

BACKGROUND

In 1989, S. Wadler reported very promising results (76% response rate) with a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus alpha-2a interferon (IFN) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC). In vitro, there are several potential explanations for synergism between the two agents. We therefore decided in 1989 to start a randomized study comparing 5-FU alone with 5-FU plus IFN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

105 non-pretreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma entered into this study. The patients were randomly allocated either in arm A (n = 49) with 5-FU: 750 mg/m2 i.v. CI d1-d5 followed by 750 mg/m2 i.v. bolus once a week, or in arm B (n = 56) with 5-FU as in arm A plus IFN 9 x 10(6) IU sub-cutaneously three times a week.

RESULTS

After two months of treatment we observed 1 CR and 2 PR in arm A (response rate 6.1%), 3 CR and 8 PR in arm B (response rate 19.6%), i.e., a significant difference (P = 0.05). Event-free survival was significantly higher in arm B (6 months) than in arm A (2 months) (P < 0.01), while median survival was slightly higher in arm B (12 months) than in arm A (10 months) (P < 0.05). For overall survival the difference was not significant after adjustment on center treatment and baseline Karnofsky status (P = 0.13). Toxicity was also greater in arm B. Sixteen percent of patients in arm A and 36% in arm B experienced certain grade 3-4 side effects (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

5-FU plus IFN is more effective than 5-FU alone in terms of response rate, event free survival but not of overall survival. 5-FU plus IFN is more toxic. As IFN has no demonstrated efficacy in MCRC as a single agent, this study suggests that IFN is acting as a 5-FU modulatory agent. The response rate observed (19.6%) is similar to the results obtained elsewhere with 5-FU plus leucovorin.