Everolimus Plus Exemestane vs Everolimus or Capecitabine Monotherapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: The BOLERO-6 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Everolimus plus exemestane and capecitabine are approved second-line therapies for advanced breast cancer.

Objective

A postapproval commitment to health authorities to estimate the clinical benefit of everolimus plus exemestane vs everolimus or capecitabine monotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Design

Open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial of treatment effects in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer that had progressed during treatment with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to 3 treatment regimens: (1) everolimus (10 mg/d) plus exemestane (25 mg/d); (2) everolimus alone (10 mg/d); and (3) capecitabine alone (1250 mg/m2 twice daily).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) for everolimus plus exemestane vs everolimus alone (primary objective) or capecitabine alone (key secondary objective). Safety was a secondary objective. No formal statistical comparisons were planned.

Results

A total of 309 postmenopausal women were enrolled, median age, 61 years (range, 32-88 years). Of these, 104 received everolimus plus exemestane; 103, everolimus alone; and 102, capecitabine alone. Median follow-up from randomization to the analysis cutoff (June 1, 2017) was 37.6 months. Estimated HR of PFS was 0.74 (90% CI, 0.57-0.97) for the primary objective of everolimus plus exemestane vs everolimus alone and 1.26 (90% CI, 0.96-1.66) for everolimus plus exemestane vs capecitabine alone. Between treatment arms, potential informative censoring was noted, and a stratified multivariate Cox regression model was used to account for imbalances in baseline characteristics; a consistent HR was observed for everolimus plus exemestane vs everolimus (0.73; 90% CI, 0.56-0.97), but the HR was closer to 1 for everolimus plus exemestane vs capecitabine (1.15; 90% CI, 0.86-1.52). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were more frequent with capecitabine (74%; n = 75) vs everolimus plus exemestane (70%; n = 73) or everolimus alone (59%; n = 61). Serious adverse events were more frequent with everolimus plus exemestane (36%; n = 37) vs everolimus alone (29%; n = 30) or capecitabine (29%; n = 30).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that everolimus plus exemestane combination therapy offers a PFS benefit vs everolimus alone, and they support continued use of this therapy in this setting. A numerical PFS difference with capecitabine vs everolimus plus exemestane should be interpreted cautiously owing to imbalances among baseline characteristics and potential informative censoring.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01783444.

Efficacy and safety of everolimus in combination with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in Asian patients with HER2+ advanced breast cancer in BOLERO-1

Background

The current exploratory analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus for treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) advanced breast cancer in the Asian subset of patients in the BOLERO-1 trial.

Methods

Postmenopausal women with HER2+ advanced breast cancer, who had not received systemic therapy for advanced disease, were randomized 2:1 to receive everolimus or placebo, plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel. The two primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in the full population and in the hormone receptor-negative (HR–) subpopulation. Secondary end points included assessment of the objective response rate, the clinical benefit rate, and safety.

Results

In the Asian subset, median PFS was similar in the everolimus (n = 198) and placebo (n = 105) arms in the full analysis set (hazard ratio = 0.82 (95% CI 0.61–1.11)). In the HR– subpopulation, everolimus prolonged median PFS by 10.97 months vs placebo (25.46 vs 14.49 months; hazard ratio = 0.48 (95% CI 0.29–0.79)). In the everolimus arm of the Asian subset, the most common adverse events of any grade were stomatitis (62.2%), diarrhea (48.0%), rash (43.4%) and neutropenia (42.3%). Neutropenia (grade 3: 27.6%; grade 4: 4.6%) and decreased neutrophil count (grade 3: 11.2%; grade 4: 3.6%) were the most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events. Serious adverse events included pneumonia (5.1%), pneumonitis (3.1%), and interstitial lung disease (3.1%). There were three deaths (1.5%) during treatment in the everolimus arm vs none in the placebo arm.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of everolimus plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2+ advanced breast cancer in the Asian subset was consistent with that reported previously in the overall population.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00876395. Registered on 2 April 2009.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0839-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract P4-22-13: Everolimus plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in women with HER2+ advanced breast cancer: Overall survival results from BOLERO-1

Background

Everolimus (EVE), an mTOR inhibitor has shown activity in HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) in both preclinical and clinical studies. In the pivotal BOLERO-1 trial (NCT00876395), the progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between the EVE + trastuzumab (TRAS) + paclitaxel (PAC) combination and placebo (PBO) + TRAS + PAC in the full HER2+ population (EVE, 15.0 mo vs PBO, 14.5 mo; HR=0.89; 95% CI: 0.73-1.08; p=0.1166). Although not reaching protocol defined level for statistical significance, the hormone receptor negative (HR-) subpopulation appeared to benefit from EVE, with a 7.2 mo PFS benefit vs PBO arm (EVE, 20.3 mo vs PBO, 13.1 mo; HR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.48-0.91; p=0.0049). The final exploratory overall survival (OS) analysis from the study is presented here.

Methods

In this phase 3 randomized trial, 719 women with HER2+ ABC without prior TRAS or chemotherapy in the metastatic setting were randomized 2:1 to receive either EVE (10 mg/d) or placebo (PBO) and weekly PAC+TRAS, stratified by visceral metastasis (lung, liver, peritoneal or pleural: yes vs no) and prior adjuvant or neo-adjuvant treatment with TRAS (yes vs no). As the primary objectives (PFS on full population and on HR- subpopulation) of BOLERO-1 were not met, the key secondary endpoint of OS was not formally statistically tested. However, given the results of PFS, in particular in the HR- subpopulation, a change to the OS analysis plan was made by introducing one final exploratory OS analysis at the time of study termination.

Results

At data cutoff (Dec 31, 2015), the median duration of exposure was 40.8 weeks (range: 0.6-320.4) in the EVE arm and 48.1 weeks (range: 1.1-308.0) in the PBO arm. After a median follow-up of 60.3 mo, 350 deaths were recorded in the full population, 238 (49.6%) in the EVE arm and 112 (46.9%) pts in the PBO arm. In the full population, the median OS was comparable in the EVE vs PBO arms (48.6 mo vs 50.0 mo respectively; HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.90-1.42). In the HR- subpopulation, 138 deaths were recorded; 88 (42.3%) pts in the EVE arm and 50 (48.5%) pts in the PBO arm. In the HR- subpopulation, the median OS in the EVE arm was longer compared to PBO arm (57.0 mo vs 41.6 mo respectively; HR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.59-1.18). Stomatitis, diarrhea, alopecia, cough, rash, pyrexia, neutropenia, and fatigue were the most frequent adverse events (AEs) reported in EVE arm (≥35%). AEs leading to dose interruption and/or change were reported in 441 (93.4%) pts in EVE arm and 165 (69.3%) pts in the PBO arm respectively. Overall, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 262 (55.5%) pts in EVE arm and 98 (41.2%) pts in PBO arm. Serious AEs were reported in 171 (36.2%) pts in the EVE arm and 40 (16.8%) pts in the PBO arm respectively. On treatment AE related deaths were reported for 3.6% pts in the EVE arm and 0% pts in the PBO arm.

Conclusions

The median OS was similar in the EVE vs PBO arms for overall population. However, a prolongation of 15.4 mo in median OS of HR- subpopulation was observed in the EVE arm vs PBO arm in this exploratory analysis. Pts in the EVE arm had a manageable safety, consistent with the safety profile of EVE and no new safety signals were identified.

Citation Format: Yardley D, Hurvitz S, Jiang Z-f, Toi M, Burris H, Buyse M, Slamon D, Makhson A, Elsaid A, Lerzo G, Hellerstedt B, Nuzzo F, Sohn J, Manzyuk L, Cabaribere D, Lincy J, Weimann A, Noel-Baron F, Pacaud L, Andre F. Everolimus plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in women with HER2+ advanced breast cancer: Overall survival results from BOLERO-1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-13.

A dietary supplement to improve the quality of sleep: a randomized placebo controlled trial

Background

To evaluate the effect of a dietary supplement containing polyunsaturated fatty acids, in association with Humulus lupulus extract, on the quality of sleep using the Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (LSEQ) in subjects with moderate to severe sleep disorders.

Methods

Randomized placebo-controlled trial, in a Population-based setting. Participants were adult patients 25 to 65 years old with a chronic primary insomnia who volunteered for the study. The tested intervention consisted of two soft gelatine capsules per day, containing either the dietary supplement (active group) or olive oil (placebo group) for a month. Subjects could also volunteer for two ancillary studies on melatonin and actigraphy. Evaluation criteria included i) perception of the quality of sleep at the end of treatment using the LSEQ questionnaire, ii) sleep efficiency measured by one-week actigraphic movement measurement performed before and during the treatment in a subsample of subjects, iii) night melatonin and 6 sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6S) urine rates in a subsample of subjects.

Results

The average of Leeds score was similar in both groups (p = 0.95). A marked improvement in the quality of sleep was observed in both placebo (62%) and active (65%) group (p = 0.52). The evolution of urinary melatonin, aMT6S, and of the Mel/aMT6S ratio showed no differences between the two groups. Sleep efficiency, as measured by actigraphy, improved similarly in both groups during the treatment period, from 72% to 76% and 75% in the active and placebo group respectively (p = 0.91).

Conclusions

The dietary supplement had neither effect on the perceived quality of sleep, nor on the melatonin metabolism and sleep-wake cycle.

Trial registration: clinical trials.gov:NCT00484497

Identification of Candida glabrata by a 30-second trehalase test

Rapid (30-s) trehalase tests done with material from colonies of 482 yeasts suspended in a drop of trehalose solution on a commercially supplied glucose test strip were positive for 225 (99.1%) of 227 Candida glabrata isolates grown on either of two differential media, Candida ID medium or CandiSelect medium. The test was positive for only 3 (1.2%) and 12 (4.7%) of 255 isolates of other medically important yeast species grown on the same two media, respectively. A rapid maltase test done with a subset of 255 yeast isolates was negative for all but 1 of 64 trehalase-positive C. glabrata isolates, raising the specificity of the rapid testing for C. glabrata to 98.4 to 100%, depending on the isolation medium used. Rapid trehalase and maltase tests done independently in two laboratories with 217 yeast isolates showed sensitivities of 96.0 to 98.0% and specificities of 98.2 to 99.4% for identification of C. glabrata from colonies grown on Candida ID medium. The specificity was much lower because of frequent false-positive trehalose test results when the source of colonies was Sabouraud agar formulated with 4% glucose. We conclude that direct recognition of C. albicans as blue colonies on Candida ID isolation medium coupled with the performance of the 30-s trehalase and maltase tests for C. glabrata among the white colonies on this medium will allow the rapid presumptive identification of the two yeast species most commonly encountered in clinical samples.