1
|
Malchers F, Nogova L, van Attekum MH, Maas L, Brägelmann J, Bartenhagen C, Girard L, Bosco G, Dahmen I, Michels S, Weeden CE, Scheel AH, Meder L, Golfmann K, Schuldt P, Siemanowski J, Rehker J, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Menon R, Gautschi O, Heuckmann JM, Brambilla E, Asselin-Labat ML, Persigehl T, Minna JD, Walczak H, Ullrich RT, Fischer M, Reinhardt HC, Wolf J, Büttner R, Peifer M, George J, Thomas RK. Somatic rearrangements causing oncogenic ectodomain deletions of FGFR1 in squamous cell lung cancer. J Clin Invest 2023; 133:e170217. [PMID: 37606995 PMCID: PMC10617767 DOI: 10.1172/jci170217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The discovery of frequent 8p11-p12 amplifications in squamous cell lung cancer (SQLC) has fueled hopes that FGFR1, located inside this amplicon, might be a therapeutic target. In a clinical trial, only 11% of patients with 8p11 amplification (detected by FISH) responded to FGFR kinase inhibitor treatment. To understand the mechanism of FGFR1 dependency, we performed deep genomic characterization of 52 SQLCs with 8p11-p12 amplification, including 10 tumors obtained from patients who had been treated with FGFR inhibitors. We discovered somatically altered variants of FGFR1 with deletion of exons 1-8 that resulted from intragenic tail-to-tail rearrangements. These ectodomain-deficient FGFR1 variants (ΔEC-FGFR1) were expressed in the affected tumors and were tumorigenic in both in vitro and in vivo models of lung cancer. Mechanistically, breakage-fusion-bridges were the source of 8p11-p12 amplification, resulting from frequent head-to-head and tail-to-tail rearrangements. Generally, tail-to-tail rearrangements within or in close proximity upstream of FGFR1 were associated with FGFR1 dependency. Thus, the genomic events shaping the architecture of the 8p11-p12 amplicon provide a mechanistic explanation for the emergence of FGFR1-driven SQLC. Specifically, we believe that FGFR1 ectodomain-deficient and FGFR1-centered amplifications caused by tail-to-tail rearrangements are a novel somatic genomic event that might be predictive of therapeutically relevant FGFR1 dependency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Malchers
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
| | - Lucia Nogova
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn, Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martijn H.A. van Attekum
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
| | - Lukas Maas
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
| | - Johannes Brägelmann
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
- Mildred Scheel School of Oncology, Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Bartenhagen
- Department of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children’s Hospital of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Luc Girard
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Graziella Bosco
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
| | - Ilona Dahmen
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
| | - Sebastian Michels
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn, Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clare E. Weeden
- Personalized Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Andreas H. Scheel
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lydia Meder
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn, Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kristina Golfmann
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn, Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Schuldt
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn, Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Janna Siemanowski
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan Rehker
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Gautschi
- University of Berne and Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat
- Personalized Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - John D. Minna
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Henning Walczak
- Institute of Biochemistry I, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Cluster of Excellence, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Centre for Cell Death, Cancer, and Inflammation (CCCI), UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roland T. Ullrich
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn, Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Fischer
- Department of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children’s Hospital of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Christian Reinhardt
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Wolf
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn, Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Reinhard Büttner
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Peifer
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Cologne, Germany
| | - Julie George
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roman K. Thomas
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Translational Genomics, Cologne, Germany Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Cologne, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scharpenseel H, Malchers F, Terjung I, Hillmer A, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Scheel AH, Siemanowski J, Scheffler M, Riedel R, Eisert A, Michels SYF, Fischer RN, Weber JP, Westphal T, Kron A, Sueptitz J, Thomas RK, Buettner R, Wolf J, Nogova L. Screening of FGFR patients for FGFR directed clinical trials in Network Genomic Medicine (NGM): Real-world data. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e21013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e21013 Background: The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 genes show a heterogenic landscape of alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whereas only a small amount is yet considered to have oncogenic potential. The frequency of activating FGFR alterations is low, counting for approximately 2% of NSCLC. We have screened NSCLC patients (pts) for FGFR translocations/mutations within NGM and analysed them on FGFR alteration frequency, patient characteristics and outcome. Methods: From 04/2019 to 01/2020 we screened 472 squamous NSCLC for FGFR gene alterations and from 02/2020 to 12/2021 an additional 5286 patients including all NSCLC cases. Of these 5286 pts, 1097 pts were analysed for FGFR fusions. We used DNA-NGS for FGFR-mutations and RNA-NGS for FGFR–translocations. Activating mutations were defined according to the publicly available molecular data bases and published data. Results: Within the cohort of 5758 NSCLC patients, we found 316 (5.5%) patients with FGFR alterations. Sixty-six (20.9% of FGFR, 1.1% of NSCLC) patients had alterations classified as activating, of whom 39 had FGFR point mutations and 27 FGFR translocations. Concerning the patients with activating alterations, they had UICC stage III or IV at time of diagnosis; 22 were females; 58 patients had squamous cell carcinoma, 6 patients had adenocarcinoma and 2 had large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Fifty-three patients (80.3%) with activating FGFR alteration had a co-mutation: TP53 (inactivating) co-mutation was seen in 41 cases (62.1%) and 19 cases had either PTEN (7 pts), KRAS (4), EGFR (3), PIK3CA (2), ROS1 (1), ALK (1) or BRAF (1) mutations. Ten patients were included in a FGFR-targeted trial. Sixty patients were available for follow-up. The median overall survival (mOS) was 21.4 month (95%CI: 16.8–25.9) for all patients with activating FGFR alteration, whereas mOS was 18.5 month (95%CI: 13.2-23.9) for FGFR mutation and 25.3 months (95%CI: 17.8-32.9) for FGFR fusions. Conclusions: FGFR 1-4 gene alterations are rare. Large molecular and clinical networks are necessary to identify these pts. Prognostic factors of FGFR patients are currently not defined. Further assessments on molecular and clinical features in FGFR altered NSCLC are needed to identify sensitivity to FGFR inhibition. Clinical trials with specific FGFR inhibitors are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Scharpenseel
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Malchers
- Department of Translational Genomics, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne–Bonn, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Inken Terjung
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Axel Hillmer
- Institute for Pathology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
- Institute for Pathology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas H. Scheel
- Institute for Pathology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Janna Siemanowski
- Institute for Pathology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Scheffler
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Richard Riedel
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna Eisert
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastian Yves Friedrich Michels
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rieke Nila Fischer
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Philip Weber
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Theresa Westphal
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna Kron
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juliane Sueptitz
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roman K. Thomas
- Department of Translational Genomics, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne–Bonn, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Reinhard Buettner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juergen Wolf
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lucia Nogova
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Lung Cancer Group, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nogova L, Malchers F, Hillmer A, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Pinto A, Woempner C, Riedel R, Scheffler M, Michels S, De Porre P, Santiago-Walker A, Fischer R, Abdulla D, Thomas R, Buettner R, Wolf J. FIND: A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of erdafitinib in FGFR-altered squamous NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz063.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
4
|
Malchers F, Attekum MHV, Peifer M, Thomas RK. Abstract 412: 8p12 amplification pattern dictates FGFR1 dependency in squamous cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Squamous cell lung cancer (SQLC) is the second most common lung cancer subtype after adenocarcinoma and accounts for 30% of all lung cancer cases. However, in contrast to adenocarcinoma, SQLC lacks therapeutic targets like activating EGFR mutations, ALK or ROS translocations. Besides immune-checkpoint-inhibition a promising treatment option in SQLC is the recurrent amplification of the tyrosine kinase fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) within the 8p12-p11 region. Thus, small molecules inhibiting FGFRs have been employed to treat FGFR1-amplified SQLC. However, only about 10% of such FGFR1-amplified tumors respond to single agent inhibitor therapy. To investigate the mechanism of FGFR inhibitor resistance in 8p12-p11 amplified SQLC we performed deep genomic and transcriptome sequencing on 53 FGFR1 amplified samples including primary tumors (n=33), patient derived xenografts (n=13) and cell lines (n=7). For 22 of these samples the response to FGFR inhibition was known. We detected frequent breaks within NSD3 (n=3), also known as WHSC1L1, favoring the expression of NSD3-short, which is known to enhance MYC expression. Furthermore, the amplification pattern for all samples was compatible with a breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) mechanism, showing chromosomal telomeric losses, copy number, and frequent intrachromosomal head to head and tail to tail breaks. Genomic reconstruction of one sample suggests a tandem duplication followed by a BFB mechanism, implying that the BFB mechanism is a later event in tumor genesis. Intrachromosomal tail to tail fusions within a 400kb region close to the FGFR1 open reading frame, have been detected in 75% of patients with a partial response to FGFR inhibitor therapy (3 of 4 patients). A similar break was detected in the FGFR inhibitor sensitive cell line H1581. All samples, which responded to FGFR inhibition (n=9), demonstrated a centered amplification pattern on NSD3 / FGFR1 and excluded amplification of the adjacent disintigrin and metalloproteinase family members (ADAM) genes. In contrast, the main amplification peak of the non-responding samples (n = 13) was centered on ADAM family members, corresponding to an increase in ADAM expression. These data suggest strong relevance of these genes for tumor development and growth, and warrant further investigation.
Citation Format: Florian Malchers, Martijn Henricus van Attekum, Martin Peifer, Roman Kurt Thomas. 8p12 amplification pattern dictates FGFR1 dependency in squamous cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 412.
Collapse
|
5
|
Malchers F, Ercanoglu M, Schütte D, Castiglione R, Tischler V, Michels S, Dahmen I, Brägelmann J, Menon R, Heuckmann JM, George J, Ansén S, Sos ML, Soltermann A, Peifer M, Wolf J, Büttner R, Thomas RK. Mechanisms of Primary Drug Resistance in FGFR1-Amplified Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2017. [PMID: 28630215 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The 8p12-p11 locus is frequently amplified in squamous cell lung cancer (SQLC); the receptor tyrosine kinase fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) being one of the most prominent targets of this amplification. Thus, small molecules inhibiting FGFRs have been employed to treat FGFR1-amplified SQLC. However, only about 11% of such FGFR1-amplified tumors respond to single-agent FGFR inhibition and several tumors exhibited insufficient tumor shrinkage, compatible with the existence of drug-resistant tumor cells.Experimental Design: To investigate possible mechanisms of resistance to FGFR inhibition, we studied the lung cancer cell lines DMS114 and H1581. Both cell lines are highly sensitive to three different FGFR inhibitors, but exhibit sustained residual cellular viability under treatment, indicating a subpopulation of existing drug-resistant cells. We isolated these subpopulations by treating the cells with constant high doses of FGFR inhibitors.Results: The FGFR inhibitor-resistant cells were cross-resistant and characterized by sustained MAPK pathway activation. In drug-resistant H1581 cells, we identified NRAS amplification and DUSP6 deletion, leading to MAPK pathway reactivation. Furthermore, we detected subclonal NRAS amplifications in 3 of 20 (15%) primary human FGFR1-amplified SQLC specimens. In contrast, drug-resistant DMS114 cells exhibited transcriptional upregulation of MET that drove MAPK pathway reactivation. As a consequence, we demonstrate that rational combination therapies resensitize resistant cells to treatment with FGFR inhibitors.Conclusions: We provide evidence for the existence of diverse mechanisms of primary drug resistance in FGFR1-amplified lung cancer and provide a rational strategy to improve FGFR inhibitor therapies by combination treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5527-36. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Malchers
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Meryem Ercanoglu
- Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Schütte
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Verena Tischler
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastian Michels
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ilona Dahmen
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Johannes Brägelmann
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Julie George
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sascha Ansén
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin L Sos
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alex Soltermann
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Peifer
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jürgen Wolf
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Roman K Thomas
- Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. .,Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nogova L, Malchers F, Bitter E, Michels SYF, Fischer RN, Scheffler M, Gardizi M, Brandes V, Scheel AH, Kambartel KO, Krüger S, Serke MH, Isaacs R, Porter D, Buettner R, Thomas RK, Wolf J. Fibroblast kinase 1-3 inhibitor BGJ398 in patients with FGFR1 amplified squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated in a phase I study: Evaluation of tumor tissue and response at a single center. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e20664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e20664 Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 ( FGFR1) amplification in squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) has been described as potential oncogenic and targetable driver in cell lines and murine models. However, a phase I study evaluating FGFR 1-3 inhibitor BGJ398 showed moderate response rate of 11% in FGFR1amplified sgNSCLC treated with dose ≥ 100mg. To identify underlying mechanisms of resistance, we analyzed tumor tissues of selected patients. Methods: Within the phase I BGJ398 study, patients (pts) with FGFR1amplified sqNSCLC were treated orally with escalating dose (5 to 150mg) of BGJ398 once daily (QD) or 50mg twice a day. In the expansion phase, pts received BGJ398 either continuously QD or on a 3-weeks on/1-week off schedule. CT scans for response were performed every 8 weeks. Available tumor tissue of pts treated with BGJ398 at our center was analyzed using hybrid capture–based massively parallel sequencing (CAGE). Results: Twenty-one pts with FGFR1 amplified sqNSCLC were treated with ≥ 100mg BGJ398 at our site. As best response, 3 pts showed partial response (PR), 7 pts stable disease (SD) and 7 pts progressive disease (PD). Two pts withdrew their consents and 2 pts died ahead of first CT scan: one due to infection and one due to sudden death. We performed CAGE covering 256 genes on 9 patients: on 3 pts with PR, 2 pts with SD, 2 pts with PD and 2 pts who died before first CT scan. All analyzed patients harbored mutations in TP53. Additionally, we detected two CDKN2A (one patient with PR and one patient who died before first CT) and three MLL2 stop codon and frame shift mutations (two patients with SD and one patient with PD). Of interest, we identified three patients with two canonical (one patient with SD and one patient who died before first CT) and one non-canonical mutations in PIK3CA(one patient with SD). Conclusions: In our analysis, MLL2 and PIK3CA mutations seem to have a negative impact on response in FGFR1 amplified pts treated with BGJ398. Further analysis with higher patient number is needed to identify the role of MLL2 and PIK3CA mutations in FGFR1 amplified sqNSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT01004224.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Nogova
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Malchers
- Department of Translational Genomics, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne–Bonn, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Bitter
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Rieke Nila Fischer
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Scheffler
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Masyar Gardizi
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vanessa Brandes
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas H. Scheel
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Randi Isaacs
- Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA
| | - Dale Porter
- Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA
| | - Reinhard Buettner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roman K. Thomas
- Department of Translational Genomics, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne–Bonn, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juergen Wolf
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Malchers F, Ercanoglu MS, Thomas RK. Abstract 2954: MAP-kinase pathway activation facilitates survival of persistent FGFR1-amplified lung cancer cells upon FGFR inhibition. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-2954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
One recurrent alteration of squamous cell lung cancer is the amplified region of the 8p12-p11 locus. The tyrosine kinase fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) seems to be one of the most prominent targets of this amplification. Thus, small molecules inhibiting FGFRs have been employed to treat FGFR1-amplified squamous cell lung cancer. However, only about 16% of such FGFR1-amplified tumors respond to single agent inhibitor therapy. Several tumors exhibited insufficient tumor shrinkage, compatible with the existence of persistence of inhibitor-resistant tumor cells in the tumor. To investigate the mechanism of FGFR-inhibitor persistence we studied the lung cancer cell lines DMS114 and H1581. Both cell lines demonstrate GI50 values in the nanomolar range upon three different FGFR-inhibitors. However, both cell lines exhibit sustained cell viability within 0.5 to 5 μM inhibitor treatment, indicating a subpopulation of persistent cells. We therefore isolated these persistent cells by treating with a high dose of FGFR inhibitors. After 8 to 12 weeks the cells were completely resistant against all FGFR inhibitors tested. Genetic identity with the original cell line was confirmed by fingerprinting. We found that while parental cell lines showed depleted pERK signals, persistent cells were marked by a constant pERK level upon treatment. In H1581 cells, reactivation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway was demonstrated by an active RAS-pulldown assay. Whole exome sequencing (WES) revealed high and focal NRAS amplification and DUSP6 depletion, leading to MAPK-pathway reactivation. Furthermore, retroviral overexpression of wild type RAS-isoforms induced FGFR-inhibitor resistance in parental H1581 cells. In DMS114 we observed MET and IGF-1R activation as possible mechanisms of persistence. Furthermore, co-inhibition of FGFR and MEK was a highly effective combination therapy to treat FGFR-inhibitor persistent cells. This study associates the MAPK-pathway as a key pathway for FGFR-dependent cell lines. Furthermore, these results suggest a beneficial FGFR / MEK combination treatment to avoid the outgrowth of FGFR-inhibitor persistent cells.
Citation Format: Florian Malchers, Meryem Seda Ercanoglu, Roman Kurt Thomas. MAP-kinase pathway activation facilitates survival of persistent FGFR1-amplified lung cancer cells upon FGFR inhibition. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2954.
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernandez-Cuesta L, Plenker D, Osada H, Sun R, Menon R, Leenders F, Ortiz-Cuaran S, Peifer M, Bos M, Daßler J, Malchers F, Schöttle J, Vogel W, Dahmen I, Koker M, Ullrich RT, Wright GM, Russell PA, Wainer Z, Solomon B, Brambilla E, Nagy-Mignotte H, Moro-Sibilot D, Brambilla CG, Lantuejoul S, Altmüller J, Becker C, Nürnberg P, Heuckmann JM, Stoelben E, Petersen I, Clement JH, Sänger J, Muscarella LA, la Torre A, Fazio VM, Lahortiga I, Perera T, Ogata S, Parade M, Brehmer D, Vingron M, Heukamp LC, Buettner R, Zander T, Wolf J, Perner S, Ansén S, Haas SA, Yatabe Y, Thomas RK. CD74-NRG1 fusions in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov 2014; 4:415-22. [PMID: 24469108 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED We discovered a novel somatic gene fusion, CD74-NRG1, by transcriptome sequencing of 25 lung adenocarcinomas of never smokers. By screening 102 lung adenocarcinomas negative for known oncogenic alterations, we found four additional fusion-positive tumors, all of which were of the invasive mucinous subtype. Mechanistically, CD74-NRG1 leads to extracellular expression of the EGF-like domain of NRG1 III-β3, thereby providing the ligand for ERBB2-ERBB3 receptor complexes. Accordingly, ERBB2 and ERBB3 expression was high in the index case, and expression of phospho-ERBB3 was specifically found in tumors bearing the fusion (P < 0.0001). Ectopic expression of CD74-NRG1 in lung cancer cell lines expressing ERBB2 and ERBB3 activated ERBB3 and the PI3K-AKT pathway, and led to increased colony formation in soft agar. Thus, CD74-NRG1 gene fusions are activating genomic alterations in invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas and may offer a therapeutic opportunity for a lung tumor subtype with, so far, no effective treatment. SIGNIFICANCE CD74–NRG1 fusions may represent a therapeutic opportunity for invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinomas, a tumor with no effective treatment that frequently presents with multifocal unresectable disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta
- 1Department of Translational Genomics; 2Department I of Internal Medicine; 3Laboratory of Translational Cancer Genomics; 4Network Genomic Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn; 5Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC); 6Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG); 7Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD); 8Department of Pathology, University Hospital Medical Center, University of Cologne; 9Blackfield AG; 10Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research; 11Thoracic Surgery, Lungenklinik Merheim, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH; 12Institute of Human Genetics, Cologne; 13Computational Molecular Biology Department, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin; 14Department of Prostate Cancer Research, Institute of Pathology; 15Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn; 16Institute of Pathology; 17Department of Internal Medicine II, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena; 18Institute for Pathology Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany;19Division of Molecular Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute; 20Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan; Departments of 21Surgery and22Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital; 23Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;24Department of Pathology, 25CHU Grenoble Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) U823, Institute Albert Bonniot, Grenoble-Alpes University, Grenoble, France; 26Laboratory of Oncology IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo; 27Laboratory for Molecular Medicine and Biotechnology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; 28Center for the Biology of Disease, VIB, Leuven; and 29Oncology Discovery, Janssen Research and Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malchers F, Dietlein F, Schöttle J, Lu X, Nogova L, Albus K, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Heuckmann JM, Gautschi O, Diebold J, Plenker D, Gardizi M, Scheffler M, Bos M, Seidel D, Leenders F, Richters A, Peifer M, Florin A, Mainkar PS, Karre N, Chandrasekhar S, George J, Silling S, Rauh D, Zander T, Ullrich RT, Reinhardt HC, Ringeisen F, Büttner R, Heukamp LC, Wolf J, Thomas RK. Cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms of transformation by amplified FGFR1 in lung cancer. Cancer Discov 2013; 4:246-57. [PMID: 24302556 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The 8p12 locus (containing the FGFR1 tyrosine kinase gene) is frequently amplified in squamous cell lung cancer. However, it is currently unknown which of the 8p12-amplified tumors are also sensitive to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibition. We found that, in contrast with other recurrent amplifications, the 8p12 region included multiple centers of amplification, suggesting marked genomic heterogeneity. FGFR1-amplified tumor cells were dependent on FGFR ligands in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, ectopic expression of FGFR1 was oncogenic, which was enhanced by expression of MYC. We found that MYC was coexpressed in 40% of FGFR1-amplified tumors. Tumor cells coexpressing MYC were more sensitive to FGFR inhibition, suggesting that patients with FGFR1-amplified and MYC-overexpressing tumors may benefit from FGFR inhibitor therapy. Thus, both cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms of transformation modulate FGFR dependency in FGFR1-amplified lung cancer, which may have implications for patient selection for treatment with FGFR inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE Amplification of FGFR1 is one of the most frequent candidate targets in lung cancer. Here, we show that multiple factors affect the tumorigenic potential of FGFR1, thus providing clinical hypotheses for refinement of patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Malchers
- 1Department of Translational Genomics, University of Cologne; 2Max-Planck-Institute for Neurological Research; Institutes of 3Pathology and 4Virology, University of Cologne;5Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne; 6Blackfield AG, Cologne; 7Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany; 8Medical Oncology and 9Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital, Luzern; 10Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; and 11Division of Natural Products Chemistry, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang J, Zhang L, Su X, Li M, Xie L, Malchers F, Fan S, Yin X, Xu Y, Liu K, Dong Z, Zhu G, Qian Z, Tang L, Schöttle J, Zhan P, Ji Q, Kilgour E, Smith PD, Brooks AN, Thomas RK, Gavine PR. Translating the therapeutic potential of AZD4547 in FGFR1-amplified non-small cell lung cancer through the use of patient-derived tumor xenograft models. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18:6658-67. [PMID: 23082000 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-2694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the incidence of FGFR1 amplification in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to preclinically test the hypothesis that the novel, potent, and selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) small-molecule inhibitor AZD4547 will deliver potent antitumor activity in NSCLC FGFR1-amplified patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A range of assays was used to assess the translational relevance of FGFR1 amplification and AZD4547 treatment including in vitro lung cell line panel screening and pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis, FGFR1 FISH tissue microarray (TMA) analysis of Chinese NSCLC (n = 127), and, importantly, antitumor efficacy testing and PD analysis of lung PDTX models using AZD4547. RESULTS The incidence of FGFR1 amplification within Chinese patient NSCLC tumors was 12.5% of squamous origin (6 of 48) and 7% of adenocarcinoma (5 of 76). AZD4547 displayed a highly selective profile across a lung cell line panel, potently inhibiting cell growth only in those lines harboring amplified FGFR1 (GI(50) = 0.003-0.111 μmol/L). AZD4547 induced potent tumor stasis or regressive effects in four of five FGFR1-amplified squamous NSCLC PDTX models. Pharmacodynamic modulation was observed in vivo, and antitumor efficacy correlated well with FGFR1 FISH score and protein expression level. CONCLUSIONS This study provides novel epidemiologic data through identification of FGFR1 gene amplification in Chinese NSCLC specimens (particularly squamous) and, importantly, extends the clinical significance of this finding by using multiple FGFR1-amplified squamous lung cancer PDTX models to show tumor stasis or regression effects using a specific FGFR inhibitor (AZD4547). Thus, the translational science presented here provides a strong rationale for investigation of AZD4547 as a therapeutic option for patients with squamous NSCLC tumors harboring amplification of FGFR1.
Collapse
|
11
|
Heuckmann JM, Balke-Want H, Malchers F, Peifer M, Sos ML, Koker M, Meder L, Lovly CM, Heukamp LC, Pao W, Küppers R, Thomas RK. Differential protein stability and ALK inhibitor sensitivity of EML4-ALK fusion variants. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18:4682-90. [PMID: 22912387 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-3260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE ALK rearrangement-positive lung cancers can be effectively treated with ALK inhibitors. However, the magnitude and duration of response is heterogeneous. In addition, acquired resistance limits the efficacy of ALK inhibitors, with most upfront resistance mechanisms being unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN By making use of the Ba/F3 cell line model, we analyzed the cytotoxic efficacy of ALK kinase inhibitors as a function of different EML4-ALK fusion variants v1, v2, v3a, and v3b as well as of three artificially designed EML4-ALK deletion constructs and the ALK fusion genes KIF5b-ALK and NPM1-ALK. In addition, the intracellular localization, the sensitivity to HSP90 inhibition and the protein stability of ALK fusion proteins were studied. RESULTS Different ALK fusion genes and EML4-ALK variants exhibited differential sensitivity to the structurally diverse ALK kinase inhibitors crizotinib and TAE684. In addition, differential sensitivity correlated with differences in protein stability in EML4-ALK-expressing cells. Furthermore, the sensitivity to HSP90 inhibition also varied depending on the ALK fusion partner but differed from ALK inhibitor sensitivity patterns. Finally, combining inhibitors of ALK and HSP90 resulted in synergistic cytotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS Our results might explain some of the heterogeneous responses of ALK-positive tumors to ALK kinase inhibition observed in the clinic. Thus, targeted therapy of ALK-positive lung cancer should take into account the precise ALK genotype. Furthermore, combining ALK and HSP90 inhibitors might enhance tumor shrinkage in EML4-ALK-driven tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes M Heuckmann
- Department of Translational Genomics, University of Cologne, c/o MPI for Neurological Research, Gleueler Str. 50, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|