Diagnostic Delay in Patients with Osteoid Osteoma

PURPOSE

 To assess diagnostic delay in patients with osteoid osteoma and to analyze influencing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 All patients treated for osteoid osteoma at our tertiary referral center between December 1997 and February 2021 were retrospectively identified (n = 302). The diagnosis was verified by an expert panel of radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. The exclusion criteria were post-interventional recurrence, missing data on symptom onset, and lack of pretherapeutic CT images. Clinical parameters were retrieved from the local clinical information system. CT and MR images were assessed by a senior specialist in musculoskeletal radiology.

RESULTS

 After all exclusions, we studied 162 patients (mean age: 24 ± 11 years, 115 men). The average diagnostic delay was 419 ± 485 days (median: 275 days; range: 21-4503 days). Gender, patient age, presence of nocturnal pain, positive aspirin test, extent of bone sclerosis, and location of the tumor within bone and relative to joints did not influence diagnostic delay (p > 0.05). It was, however, positively correlated with nidus size (r = 0.26; p < 0.001) and was shorter with affection of long tubular bones compared to all other sites (p = 0.04). If osteoid osteoma was included in the initial differential diagnoses, the diagnostic delay was also shorter (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

 The diagnostic delay in patients with osteoid osteoma is independent of demographics, clinical parameters, and most imaging parameters. A long average delay of more than one year suggests low awareness of the disease among physicians. Patients with unclear imaging findings should thus be referred to a specialized musculoskeletal center or an expert in the field should be consulted in a timely manner.

KEY POINTS

  · In this retrospective study of 162 patients treated for osteoid osteoma, the median diagnostic delay was 275 days (range: 21-4503 days).. · Gender, age, presence of nocturnal pain, positive aspirin test, extent of bone sclerosis, and location of the tumor did not influence the diagnostic delay (p > 0.05).. · Diagnostic delay was positively correlated with nidus size (r = 0.26; p < 0.001) and was shorter with affection of long tubular bones compared to all other sites (376 ± 485 vs. 560 ± 462 days; p = 0.04)..

Associations between Bone Mineral Density and Longitudinal Changes of Vertebral Bone Marrow and Paraspinal Muscle Composition Assessed Using MR-Based Proton Density Fat Fraction and T2* Maps in Patients with and without Osteoporosis

Background: Proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) and T2* of the vertebrae, as well as the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the paraspinal musculature (PSM), have been suggested as biomarkers for bone fragility. The aim of this study was to longitudinally assess changes in PDFF, T2* and CSA of the PSM over 6 months in patients with and without osteoporosis. Methods: Opportunistic bone mineral density (BMD) measurements (BMD < 120 mg/cm3) were obtained from a CT acquired during the clinical routine work up in osteoporotic/osteopenic patients (n = 29, mean age 72.37 ± 10.12 years, 16 women). These patients were frequency-matched for age and sex to subjects with normal BMD values (n = 29). All study patients underwent 3T MR imaging at baseline and 6-month follow up, including spoiled gradient echo sequences for chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation, from which T2* and PDFF values of the lumbar spine and the PSM were obtained. Moreover, the CSA of the PSM was assessed longitudinally. Changes in T2*, PDFF and CSA over 6 months were calculated for the vertebrae and PSM and associations with baseline BMD values were assessed. Results: The change in CSA of the PSM over 6 months was significantly lower in the osteoporotic/osteopenic group (−91.5 ± 311.7 mm2), compared to the non-osteoporotic group, in which the CSA increased (29.9 ± 164.0 mm2, p = 0.03). In a further analysis, patients with higher vertebral PDFF at baseline showed a significantly stronger increase in vertebral T2*, compared to those patients with lower vertebral PDFF at baseline (0.9 ± 1.6 ms vs. 0.0 ± 1.8 ms, p = 0.04). Moreover, patients with higher PSM PDFF at baseline showed a significantly stronger increase in vertebral T2*, compared to those patients with lower PSM PDFF at baseline (0.9 ± 2.0 ms vs. 0.0 ± 1.3 ms, p = 0.03). Conclusion: The PSM CSA decreased significantly longitudinally in patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia, compared to those without. Additionally, higher vertebral and PSM PDFF at baseline were associated with stronger changes in vertebral bone marrow T2*. Therefore, longitudinal PDFF and T2* mapping may be useful quantitative radiation-free tools for the assessment and prediction of muscle and bone health in patients with suspected osteoporosis/osteopenia.

MR-based proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of the vertebral bone marrow differentiates between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures

The bone marrow proton density fat fraction (PDFF) assessed with MRI enables the differentiation between osteoporotic/osteopenic patients with and without vertebral fractures. Therefore, PDFF may be a potentially useful biomarker for bone fragility assessment.

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of vertebral bone marrow can differentiate between osteoporotic/osteopenic patients with and without vertebral fractures.

METHODS

Of the 52 study patients, 32 presented with vertebral fractures of the lumbar spine (66.4 ± 14.4 years, 62.5% women; acute low-energy osteoporotic/osteopenic vertebral fractures, N = 25; acute high-energy traumatic vertebral fractures, N = 7). These patients were frequency matched for age and sex to patients without vertebral fractures (N = 20, 69.3 ± 10.1 years, 70.0% women). Trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) values were derived from quantitative computed tomography. Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI of the lumbar spine was performed, and PDFF maps were calculated. Associations between fracture status and PDFF were assessed using multivariable linear regression models.

RESULTS

Over all patients, mean PDFF and trabecular BMD correlated significantly (r =  - 0.51, P < 0.001). In the osteoporotic/osteopenic group, those patients with osteoporotic/osteopenic fractures had a significantly higher PDFF than those without osteoporotic fractures after adjusting for age, sex, weight, height, and trabecular BMD (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval], 20.8% [10.4%, 30.7%]; P < 0.001), although trabecular BMD values showed no significant difference between the subgroups (P = 0.63). For the differentiation of patients with and without vertebral fractures in the osteoporotic/osteopenic subgroup using mean PDFF, an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.88 (P = 0.006) was assessed. When evaluating all patients with vertebral fractures, those with high-energy traumatic fractures had a significantly lower PDFF than those with low-energy osteoporotic/osteopenic vertebral fractures (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MR-based PDFF enables the differentiation between osteoporotic/osteopenic patients with and without vertebral fractures, suggesting the use of PDFF as a potential biomarker for bone fragility.