Global real-world experiences with pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma after platinum-based chemotherapy: the ARON-2 study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed previous treatment paradigm of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). The ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients with documented metastatic UC treated by pembrolizumab as second-line therapy were retrospectively collected from 88 institutions in 23 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). Cox proportional hazards models were adopted to explore the presence of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In total, 836 patients were included: 544 patients (65%) received pembrolizumab after progression to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (cohort A) and 292 (35%) after recurring within < 12 months since the completion of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cohort B). The median follow-up time was 15.3 months. The median OS and the ORR were 10.5 months and 31% in the overall study population, 9.1 months and 29% in cohort A and 14.6 months and 37% in cohort B. At multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS ≥ 2, bone metastases, liver metastases and pembrolizumab setting (cohort A vs B) proved to be significantly associated with worst OS and PFS. Stratified by the presence of 0, 1-2 or 3-4 prognostic factors, the median OS was 29.4, 12.5 and 4.1 months (p < 0.001), while the median PFS was 12.2, 6.4 and 2.8 months, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that pembrolizumab is effective in the advanced UC real-world context, showing outcome differences between patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Prognostic Stratification by the Meet-URO Score in Real-World Older Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Receiving Cabozantinib: A Subanalysis of the Prospective ZEBRA Study (Meet-URO 9)

BACKGROUND

The addition of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and bone metastases to the IMDC classification provided by the Meet-URO score, resulted in higher prognostic accuracy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving ≥2nd line nivolumab or cabozantinib in 2 retrospective analyses and 1st line nivolumab-ipilimumab in an expanded access programme. Prognostic estimates for older mRCC patients might be key for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

The outcome of real-world older (≥70 years) mRCC patients treated with any line cabozantinib within the multicenter observational prospective ZEBRA (Meet-URO 9) study was analyzed according to the baseline Meet-URO score. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The discriminative ability by Harrell's c-index and calibration were assessed to compare the Meet-URO and IMDC scores.

RESULTS

A total of 104 mRCC patients received cabozantinib as 1st (38%), 2nd (20%), or ≥3rd (41%) line. With a median follow-up of 11.2 months, the median OS (mOS) was of 18.4 months. According to the IMDC score, favorable (15%), intermediate (65%) and poor-risk (19%) patients had a mOS not reached, of 15.6 and 5.7 months respectively (p = .011). According to the Meet-URO score groups, mOS was not reached in both group 1 (10%) and group 2 (25%), while in group 3 (33%), group 4 (25%) and group 5 (8%) mOS was of 13.6, 12.5, and 3.7 months, respectively (p < .001). The discriminative ability of the Meet-URO score was maintained by merging groups 1 to 2 vs. 3 to 4 vs. 5 (p < .001). The Meet-URO score (with either the original 5-group stratification or the modified 3-group one) showed higher accuracy than the IMDC score (c-index of 0.686 and 0.676 vs. 0.622).

CONCLUSION

This analysis confirmed the prognostic accuracy of the Meet-URO score in older mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib and its role as a convenient tool for informing the patient and clinical decisions.

Real World Analysis of Peritoneal Metastasis From Renal Cell Carcinoma. Meet-Uro27

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal metastases (PM) have been reported in approximately 1% of patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Outcome data are limited due to the rarity of this metastatic site. Therefore, the aim of our study is to describe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with PM treated as per clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Baseline characteristics and outcome data of patients with PM from RCC were retrospectively collected from 18 Italian oncological referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group, from January 2016 to January 2023.

RESULTS

We collect 81 RCC patients with PM. 78/81 received systemic treatment, 3/81 only best supportive care. First line treatment included tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) (46/78), ImmuneOncology (IO)-TKI (26/78) and IO-IO (6/78), with different Objective Response Rate (ORR) (43.4% in TKI monotherapy group vs 50% in IO-TKI group, respectively) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) (60.8% in TKI treated patients vs. 76.9% in IO-TKI treated patients). Median PFS was 6.4 months (95%CI 4.18-14.8) in patients treated with TKI monotherapy vs 23.7 months (95%CI 11.1-NR) in patients treated with IO-TKI (p < 0.015). The median OS (mOS) was 22.7 months (95%CI 13.32 - 64.7) in the TKI monotherapy group vs 34.5 mo (95%CI NR-NR) in the IO-TKI group with 53.8% of patients alive at 1 years in the latter group, (p < 0.16). Primary refractory patients were 36.9% for TKI and 15.3% for IO-TKI. According to International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score, mPFS and mOS were consistent among risk categories. Median PFS was 36.6 months (95%CI 10.9-NR) for good risk patients compared to 10 months (95%CI 7.5-29.8) for intermediate risk and 2.96 months (95%CI 2.43-11.28) for poor risk population (p < 0.0005) whereas mOS was NR (95%CI 28.65-NR) for good risk patients compared to 35.3 months (95%CI 24.6-NA) and 12.4 months (95%CI 3.52-NR) for intermediate and poor risk population, respectively, (p < 0.0002). Only 34/78 (43.5%) received a second line treatment that was TKI (ORR 8.3% and DCR 41.6%) or IO (ORR 18.1% and DCR 40.9%).

CONCLUSION

We report one of the largest case series regarding PM from RCC. Characteristics of patients suggest a more aggressive behavior of PM from mRCC. Outcome data suggest that TKI-IO as first line treatment, and TKI as second line, confirm their activity for these patients with dismal prognosis.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Penile Carcinoma: A Sub-Analysis From Meet-URO 23 (I-RARE) Registry Study

INTRODUCTION

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare tumor with an aggressive behavior. The Meet-URO 23/I-RARE registry includes rare genitourinary malignancies. We extracted patients with PSCC to conduct a retrospective study aimed at assessing clinical outcomes and prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival. Prognostic factors for OS and PFS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. From the Meet-URO 23/I-RARE database, we extracted 128 patients with diagnosis of PSCC. About 48% of patients underwent first-line of therapy.

RESULTS

In the overall population, median OS from diagnosis was 34.6 months. Significant differences in median OS were observed according to ECOG PS at diagnosis (57.3 months vs. 8.3 months; P < .001), and median age (≤77y 88.8 months vs. >77y 26 months; P = .013). At multivariate analysis, ECOG PS 2-4 at diagnosis (HR 3.04) and lymph node metastases (HR 2.49) were independently associated with a higher risk of death. Among patients undergoing first-line therapy (n = 61), median OS was 12.3 months, and a statistically significant difference was found according to type of response to first-line (DCR 24.4 months vs. PD 7.1 months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that only age >77 years was associated with a worse OS (HR 2.16). A statistically significant difference in PFS was found according to platinum plus 5-fluorouracil versus platinum plus taxane (4.9 vs. 3.4 months; P = .036) and regimens with 2 versus 3 drugs (3.4 vs. 8.6 months; P = .019). At the multivariate analysis only regimens with platinum plus taxane were associated with worse PFS (HR 2.83).

CONCLUSION

In our registry study, PSCC is confirmed to be an aggressive disease. Poor ECOG PS, presence of lymph node metastases, and higher age at diagnosis appear to be associated with worse survival outcomes.

Real-world Outcome of Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Intermediate- or Poor-risk International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Criteria Treated by Immune-oncology Combinations: Differential Effectiveness by Risk Group?

BACKGROUND

Renal c carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urinary cancers worldwide, with a predicted increase in incidence in the coming years. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, in doublets, or in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has rapidly become a cornerstone of the RCC therapeutic scenario, but no head-to-head comparisons have been made. In this setting, real-world evidence emerges as a cornerstone to guide clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with first-line immune combinations or immune oncology (IO)-TKIs for advanced RCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Data from 930 patients, 654 intermediate risk and 276 poor risk, were collected retrospectively from 58 centers in 20 countries. Special data such as sarcomatoid differentiation, body mass index, prior nephrectomy, and metastatic localization, in addition to biochemical data such as hemoglobin, platelets, calcium, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophils, and radiological response by investigator's criteria, were collected.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was calculated by the inverse Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median follow-up time was 18.7 mo. In the 654 intermediate-risk patients, the median OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients with the intermediate than in those with the poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria (38.9 vs 17.3 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] p < 0.001, and 17.3 vs 11.6 mo, 95% CI p < 0.001, respectively). In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the OS was 55.7 mo (95% CI 31.4-55.7) and 40.2 mo (95% CI 29.6-51.6) in patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p = 0.047). PFS was 30.7 mo (95% CI 16.5-55.7) and 13.2 mo (95% CI 29.6-51.6) in intermediate-risk patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p < 0.001). In the poor-risk subgroup, the median OS and PFS did not show a statistically significant difference between IO + IO and IO + TKI. Our study presents several limitations, mainly due to its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed differences between the IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations in intermediate-risk patients. A clear association with longer PFS and OS in favor of patients who received the IO + TKI combinations compared with the IO-IO combination was observed. Instead, in the poor-risk group, we observed no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients who received different combinations.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Renal cancer is one of the most frequent genitourinary tumors. Treatment is currently based on immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but there are no comparisons between these.In this study, we have analyzed the clinical course of 930 patients from 58 centers in 20 countries around the world. We aimed to analyze the differences between the two main treatment strategies, combination of two immunotherapies versus immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy, and found in real-life data that intermediate-risk patients (approximately 60% of patients with metastatic renal cancer) seem to benefit more from the combination of immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy than from double immunotherapy. No such differences were found in poor-risk patients. This may have important implications in daily practice decision-making for these patients.

Assessing the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib and everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: insights from the RELIEVE study's analysis of heavily pretreated patients

Background

The treatment of heavily pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) represents an unmet medical need and is still challenging.

Objectives

The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of the lenvatinib plus everolimus combination and the secondary objective was the toxicity profile of this combination.

Design

We conducted a longitudinal retrospective study examining mRCC patients pre-treated with one or more lines of therapy among different cancer centers in Italy.

Methods

The study included patients who received the combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus as either a second-line treatment or beyond. We assessed progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and toxicity profile. In addition, we explored the potential relationship between treatment effectiveness and clinical and laboratory parameters.

Results

In all, 33 patients were assessed, the median age was 60 years, 57% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1-2 and. 63% received ⩾ 3 prior lines of therapy. 62% were 'intermediate risk' according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium and 30% were 'poor risk'. The RR was 42% (no complete response), 18% stable disease. Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.8-19.9), median PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 0.6-30.8), and median TTF was 6.7 months (95% CI 4.8-16.6). A shorter OS was significantly associated with lymph node metastases (p = 0.043, 95% CI), neutrophils/ lymphocytes ratio (NLR) ⩾ 3 (p = 0.007), hemoglobin/red cell distribution width ratio cutoff value <0.7 was significant (p = 0.03) while a shorter PFS was associated with lung (p = 0.048) and brain metastases (p = 0.023). The most frequent G1 toxicity was diarrhea (24%), G2 was fatigue (30%), and hypertension and skin toxicity (6%) for G3.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest a clinically relevant effectiveness of lenvatinib plus everolimus combination with an acceptable toxicity profile for heavily pretreated patients with mRCC.

Use of concomitant proton pump inhibitors, statins or metformin in patients treated with pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: data from the ARON-2 retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Concomitant medications may potentially affect the outcome of cancer patients. In this sub-analysis of the ARON-2 real-world study (NCT05290038), we aimed to assess the impact of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), statins, or metformin on outcome of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) receiving second-line pembrolizumab.

METHODS

We collected data from the hospital medical records of patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab as second-line therapy at 87 institutions from 22 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 802 patients were eligible for this retrospective study; the median follow-up time was 15.3 months. PPI users compared to non-users showed inferior PFS (4.5 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.002) and OS (8.7 vs. 14.1 months, p < 0.001). Concomitant PPI use remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS after multivariate Cox analysis. The use of statins or metformin was not associated with response or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results suggest a significant prognostic impact of concomitant PPI use in mUC patients receiving pembrolizumab in the real-world context. The mechanism of this interaction warrants further elucidation.

Geographical differences in the management of metastatic de novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune-combinations

BACKGROUND

The upfront treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune-based combinations. The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in these patients is still debated. The ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) was designed to globally analyze real-world data of mRCC patients receiving first-line immuno-oncology combinations. This sub-analysis is focused on the role of upfront or delayed partial or radical CN in three geographical areas (Western Europe, Eastern Europe, America/Asia).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study in mRCC patients treated with first-line immune combinations from 55 centers in 19 countries. From 1152 patients in the ARON-1 dataset, we selected 651 patients with de novo mRCC. 255 patients (39%) had undergone CN, partial in 14% and radical in 86% of cases; 396 patients (61%) received first-line immune-combinations without previous nephrectomy.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of de novo mRCC was 41.6 months and not reached (NR) in the CN subgroup and 24.0 months in the no CN subgroup, respectively (P<0.001). Median OS from the start of first-line therapy was NR in patients who underwent CN and 22.4 months in the no CN subgroup (P<0.001). Patients who underwent CN reported longer OS compared to no CN in all the three geographical areas.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in terms of patients' outcome seem to clearly emerge, even if the rate CN and the choice of the type of first-line immune-based combination varies across the different Cancer Centers participating in the ARON-1 project.

Real-world outcomes of docetaxel (DOC) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): First analysis from an Italian multicenter observational study (ECHOS trial)

167

Background: Although CHAARTED trial suggested a survival advantage in de novo (DN) high volume (HV) mCSPC pts, the use of DOC is still debated according to the timing of either metastatic onset [relapsed (REL) vs DN] or disease burden [low volume (LV) vs HV]. In this view, it could be of interest to describe the real-world use of DOC. From 2014, ECHOS multicenter study is collecting real world data from mCSPC pts in Italy, where DOC was the only reimbursed agent until recently. Here, we present study results after first data lock at the end of 2021. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of the mCSPC pts treated with DOC in 34 Italian Institutions. For each pt we recorded pre and post-DOC clinical history, baseline characteristics, treatment details and clinical outcomes. Results: We identified 568 pts [median age 66.5 yrs (range 43-85)]. Most of them were classified as having a DN/HV disease (78%): the remaining had a REL/LV (2.5%), a REL/HV (8.1%), and a DN/LV disease (11.5%). After a median follow-up of 22 mos, 389 pts experienced disease progression and 227 died. The survival outcomes according to the metastases timing and disease volume is reported in the table. Conclusions: Our real-world experience shows that DOC is proposed not only in DN/HV pts, but also in the other pts regardless of metastases timing and disease volume. The prognosis of DN/HV pts treated with DOC appears to be worse than in CHAARTED trial. These findings need to be confirmed by further analyses made on larger number of pts enrolled in the ECHOS trial. [Table: see text]

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with cabozantinib within the multicenter prospective trial ZEBRA/Meet-URO 9

648

Background: The oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor Cabozantinib (CABO) is frequently used to treat patients with metastatic RCC. Polypharmacy is common in elderly pts, thus several drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with cabozantinib may ensue. Methods: ZEBRA /MEET-URO 9 was a prospective, real world trial enrolling pts ≥ 70 years with mRRC treated with CABO at 13 Italian Oncology Centers. All concomitants drugs administered to pts were collected and categorized according to active principles and indication. DDIs were identified through a dedicated software (Lexicomp), scientific databases (Sider4.1) and published articles. Results: we enrolled 104 pts, median age 75.8 years (range 70.2-87.4 yrs). Overall, 91.4% of the cohort was treated at a reduced dose either upfront or due to side effects. Pts took a median of 6 concomitant drugs (IQR: 4-9), for a total of 131 active principles. Software analysis identified 4 DDIs (warfarin, apixaban, diltiazem and furosemide); whereas scientific reports allowed us to identify 15 additional DDIs involving metoprolol, nebivolol, olmesartan, amiloride, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, polyenoic omega-3 fatty acids, loperamide, metoclopramide, metformin, dutasteride, dexamethasone, prednisone, cetirizine and doxazosin. Seventy pts with potential DDIs experienced a trend for higher rate of grade 3-4 adverse events compared to other pts, although difference was not statistically significant (48.7% v 23.5 %, p=0.485). The table summarizes the main DDIs and suggestions to avoid or mitigate their effects Conclusions: the risk of DDIs was not negligible in our cohort of elderly mRCC pts treated with CABO, although the frequent dose reductions of CABO probably confounded their impact on toxicities. Unremitting attention to concomitant medications in the elderly is thus warranted. [Table: see text]

Prognostic stratification by the Meet-URO score in a real-world elderly population of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving cabozantinib: A subanalysis of the prospective ZEBRA study (Meet-URO 9)

637

Background: The combination of neutrophil to lymphocyte (NLR), bone metastases and IMDC score in the novel prognostic Meet-URO score has shown a higher prognostic performance than the IMDC score alone in mRCC pts receiving ≥2nd line nivolumab or cabozantinib in two retrospective analyses and 1st line nivolumab-ipilimumab in a real-world prospective study [http://bit.ly/Meet-URO15_score]. Further validation is needed since this score represents an easy prognostic tool for clinical practice with no additional costs. Methods: A real-world analysis of elderly (≥70 yo) mRCC pts treated with any line cabozantinib was conducted in the multicenter observational prospective Zebra study. Baseline Meet-URO score was assessed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the Harrell’s c-index was calculated to compare accuracy of survival prediction of the Meet-URO and IMDC scores. Results: 104 mRCC pts received cabozantinib as 1st (38%), 2nd (20%), 3rd (33%) and 4th (8%) line, with a median follow-up of 11.2 months (mo) and a median overall survival (mOS) of 18.4 mo. According to the IMDC score, favorable- (15%), intermediate- (65%) and poor-risk (19%) pts had a mOS not reached (NR), 15.6 and of 5.7 mo, respectively (p = 0.011). Reclassifying the population according to the Meet-URO score, we observed that group 1 (10%) and group 2 (25%) had both mOS NR, whereas group 3 (33%), group 4 (25%) and group 5 (8%) had a mOS of 13.6, 12.5 and 3.7 mo, respectively (p = 0.001). Moreover, the Meet-URO score maintained its discrimination ability also merging group 1-2 vs 3-4 vs 5 (p < 0.001). NLR < 3.2 was the heaviest component of the score (p < 0.001, mOS 24.8 vs 11.5 mo). The Meet-URO score (using both original with 5 groups and modified with 3 groups) has shown a higher prognostic power than the IMDC score alone (c-index of 0.686 and 0.676 vs 0.622). Conclusions: This analysis confirmed the higher accuracy in survival stratification of the Meet-URO score compared with the IMDC score alone also in a specific population like elderly mRCC pts treated with cabozantinib. NLR was confirmed as a strong prognostic factor with cabozantinib. Further applications of the Meet-URO score in mRCC pts treated with first-line immune-combinations are planned and highly awaited. Clinical trial information: 2018/116/PU .

Real world analysis of peritoneal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: Meet-Uro 27 study

638

Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) have been reported in approximately 1% of patients (pts) with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Outcome data are limited due to the rarity of this metastatic site. Therefore, the aim of our study is to describe RCC pts with PM treated as per clinical practice. Methods: Baseline characteristics and outcome data of pts with PM from RCC were retrospectively collected from 12 Italian oncological referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group, from January 2016 to September 2022. Results: We collect 91 RCC pts with PM. 87/91 pts received systemic treatment, 4/87 only best supportive care. First line treatment included TKI and ImmuneOncology(IO)-TKI with different Objective Response Rate(ORR) (41% vs 53.8%, respectively) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) (57.1% and 80.7%, respectively) as well as median PFS (9.9 mo (95%CI 4.5-15.4) for TKI and not reached (NR) for IO-TKI (69.7% pts were free from progression at a median follow up of 13.8 months). Primary refractory (PR) pts were 35.7% for TKI and 7.7% for IO-TKI. According to IMDC score, mPFS was consistent among risk categories, 36.8 mo (95%CI 9.6-63.9) for good risk pts, 13.8 mo (95%CI 8.8-18.8) for intermediate pts and 2.9 mo (95%CI 2.2-3.7) for poor risk pts. Synchronous PM was associated to shorter mPFS 11.0 (95%CI 3.1-19.0) compared to patients with metacronous involvement as well as ORR (31.3%) and DCR (43.1%) whereas PR was higher (34.7%). Only 43/87 pts (45.7%) received a second line treatment that was TKI ( ORR 30.7%; DCR 61.5%; or IO (ORR 20.6%; DCR 41.3%). mOS was 21.8 mo (12.0-31.5) for TKI and NR for pts treated with IO-TKI (80.8 alive at 1 yrs). According to IMDC score, mOS was NR for good risk pts, 24.6 (95%CI 15.8-33.3) and 3.4 (95%CI 2.4-4.3) for intermediate and poor risk, respectively. Conclusions: We report one of the largest case series regarding PM from RCC. Poor risk patients according to IMDC score, sarcomatoid feature and liver metastasis were more represented in our population, compared to historical control, suggesting a more aggressive behavior of PM mRCC. Outcome data suggest that TKI-IO as first line treatment, compared to TKI monotherapy, and TKI as second line, compared to IO, are more active treatment for these pts with dismal prognosis. Nevertheless, synchronous PM has been reported in 57% of pts with poorer outcome and lower response rate. [Table: see text]

Cabozantinib in the elderly with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing geriatric G8 screening test: A prospective multicenter observational study (ZEBRA/MEET-URO 9)

647

Background: Cabozantinib (CABO) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor registered for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for the first or subsequent lines. Tolerability in real world elderly patients is poorly documented. G8 is a short test for vulnerability gaining increased interest as a screening tool for trials in geriatric oncology. Methods: ZEBRA/MEET-URO 9 was a prospective multicenter study of safety and activity of CABO administered to pts ≥70 years with mRCC, either in the first or subsequent lines of treatment, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. All pts underwent G8 score at baseline, with a cut-off for vulnerability of 14 or below. Data on tolerability and activity were collected prospectively after signature of informed consent. Results: A total of 104 pts started CABO at 13 Italian Centers, 38,5% as first line. Median age was 75.8 yrs (range 70.2-87.4 yrs, 26 pts ≥80 yrs), 73.1% males. IMDC score was good 19.2%, intermediate 53.9%, poor 26.9%. Primary tumor had been removed in 82.7% of pts, histology was clear cell 78.8%, papillary 8.7%, chromophobe 5.8%, unclassified 6.7%. G8 score was ≤14 in 65.4% of pts. Up-front dose reduction of CABO was more frequent in pts with low G8 score (79.4 vs 41.7%, p=0.003), but eventually the majority of pts (91.4%) underwent dose reductions of CABO. After a median treatment of 6.4 months (0.5-26.1 months), 38.4% of pts developed G3-4 toxicities, 22.1% interrupted treatment due to adverse events, 2.8% (3 pts) died due to cardiovascular or thromboembolic events. Median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI=5.8-12.6 months) in first line, 10.0 months (5.8-15.6) in second or further lines, median OS was 20.1 months (11.1-not reached) and 15.6 months (12.5-not reached), respectively. G8 score ≤14 did not correlate with rate of temporary interruptions >7 days, hospitalization, incidence of G3-5 toxicities, as well as with PFS. Pts with G8 score ≤14 had a trend for reduced OS, but difference was not statistically significant both in the first and further lines of treatment. Conclusions: Screening G8 test was positive in more than a half of pts, underlying the need for detailed geriatric assessment and increased clinical monitoring of such patients. A G8 score ≤14 correlated with up-front dose reduction of CABO but not with G3-5 toxicities probably due to the high rates of dose reductions in the whole cohort. Correlation between low G8 score and OS could not be demonstrated in this population.

Impact of Previous Nephrectomy on Clinical Outcome of Metastatic Renal Carcinoma Treated With Immune-Oncology: A Real-World Study on Behalf of Meet-URO Group (MeetUro-7b)

BACKGROUND

Immune-Oncology (IO) improves Overall Survival (OS) in metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic impact of previous Cytoreductive Nephrectomy (CN) and radical nephrectomy (RN), with curative intent, in patients treated with IO is not well defined. The aim of our paper is to evaluate the impact of previous nephrectomy on outcome of mRCC patients treated with IO.

METHODS

287 eligible patients were retrospectively collected from 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the MeetUro association. Patients treated with IO as second and third line were included, whereas patients treated with IO as first line were excluded. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to compare Progression Free Survival (PFS) and OS between groups. In our analysis, both CN and RN were included. The association between nephrectomy and other variables was analyzed in univariate and multivariate setting using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

246/287 (85.7%) patients had nephrectomy before IO treatment. Median PFS in patients who underwent nephrectomy (246/287) was 4.8 months (95%CI 3.9-5.7) vs 3.7 months (95%CI 1.9-5.5) in patients who did not it (HR log rank 0.78; 95%CI 0.53 to 1.15; p = 0.186). Median OS in patients who had previous nephrectomy (246/287) was 20.9 months (95%CI 17.6-24.1) vs 13 months (95%CI 7.7-18.2) in patients who did not it (HR log rank 0.504; 95%CI 0.337 to 0.755; p = 0.001). In the multivariate model, nephrectomy showed a significant association with OS (HR log rank 0.638; 95%CI 0.416 to 0.980), whereas gland metastases were still associated with better outcome in terms of both OS (HR log rank 0.487; 95%CI 0.279 to 0.852) and PFS (HR log rank 0.646; 95%CI 0.435 to 0.958).

CONCLUSIONS

IO treatment, in patients who had previously undergone nephrectomy, was associated with a better outcome in terms of OS. Further prospective trials would assess this issue in order to guide clinicians in real word practice.

Impact of previous nephrectomy on clinical outcome of metastatic renal carcinoma treated with immune-oncology (I-O):A real-world study on behalf of Meet-URO group (MeetUro-7b)

e17088

Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) treatment demonstrated to improve Overall Survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic impact of previous citoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and radical nephrectomy with curative intent in patients (pts) treated with IO is not well defined. Methods: 229 eligible pts, with a least one radiological assessment of response according to the RECIST 1:1 criteria, were retrospectively collected from 16 Italian referral centers. Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were collected. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to compare PFS and OS between groups. Results: 153(66.8%) pts received IO as second line, 61(26.6%) as third line and 15(6.6%) pts as further line. 54 pts (23.6%) were good risk, 144(62.9%) were intermediate and 31(13.5%) were poor risk according to IMDC score. 189(82.5%) pts underwent nephrectomy (of them 72(32.4%) pts had synchronous metastatic disease and underwent CN), while 40(17.4%) pts did not. Nephrectomy was performed before IO treatment. ECOG PS, at the beginning of IO, was 0 for 167 pts (72.9%), the other 62 (27.1%) had ECOG PS 1 or 2. At a median follow up time of 17.5 months (mo), 13 (5.7%) pts are still in treatment while 216 (94.3%) experienced progression. 81 (35.3%) pts were treated after IO progression with mTOR and VEGFR inhibitors. 63 (27.5%) pts continued IO beyond progression. G3-G4 iAE were reported in 46 pts (20%). Median IO-PFS was 4.5 months in pts who did not undergo nephrectomy and 2.9 mo in pts who did (HR log rank 0.713, 95%CI 0.4788 to 1.063; p= 0.0582). Median IO-OS was 18.4 mo in pts who underwent nephrectomy and 10.3 mo in pts who did not (HR log rank 1.915, 95%CI 1.118 to 3.281; p= 0.0024). The difference in OS was irrespective of the IMDC criteria and the lines of treatment. Conclusions: In our real world experience, in mRCC pts treated with IO, previous nephrectomy was associated with a better outcome in terms of OS with all the limitations of a retrospective collection.

Clinical outcomes of metastatic renal carcinoma following disease progression to programmed death (PD)-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (I-O): A Meet-URO group real-world study (Meet-Uro 7)

691

Background: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), immune-oncology (IO), alone or in combination, (IO-IO or IO-TKI) has changed the therapeutic scenario. Few real-world data are available about safety and outcome after IO progression. Methods: Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities were retrospectively collected from 162 eligible pts treated in 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group and progressing to IO. Results: 111 pts (68,5%) were treated after progression to IO. 142 (87.6%) pts received IO as second line, 5 pts as first line and 16 pts as further line. Subsequent therapy included cabozantinib (n = 79, 48.0%), everolimus (n = 11, 6.7%), sunitinib (n = 6, 3.7%) and others (n = 15, 9.25%). Median IO-PFS was 4 months (95%CI 3.1-4.8) with no difference in pts pretreated with pazopanib or sunitinib (4 months (95%CI 2.4-5.5) vs 3,9 months (95%CI 2.9-4.9) p = 0.5). PFS tends to be longer in pts reporting adverse events of any grade (5.03 (95%CI 3.8-6.1) vs 2,99 (95%CI 2.4-3.5) months p = 0.004) or without nephrectomy (4.1 vs 2.9 months p = 0.071). Median PFS, in pts treated post-IO, was 6.5 months (95%CI 5.1-7.8). In term of best response, 55 pts (49%) had stability of disease/partial response and 29 pts (26%) had progressive disease, for the other pts treatment is still ongoing. Pts with ECOG PS 0 at progression to IO, had longer PFS, 11 months (95%CI 5.7-17.5) as well as those treated with cabozantinib (7.6 months, 95%CI 5.2-10.1) compared to everolimus, (3.2 months, 95%CI 1.8-4.5) or other drugs (4.3 months, 95%CI 1.3-7.4) p = 0.001. All grade adverse events were reported in 83 pts (74%) with G3-G4 adverse events in 39 pts (35%). Median overall survival, from first line, was 41,1 months (95%CI 30.4-51.8). Conclusions: In our real world experience after progression to IO, most pts received VEGF-TKI and mTOR inhibitors that showed to be active and safe choices. Cabozantinib was associated with a longer mPFS.

Second line therapy with axitinib after only prior sunitinib in metastatic renal cell cancer: Italian multicenter real world SAX study final results

BACKGROUND

This multi-institutional retrospective real life study was conducted in 22 Italian Oncology Centers and evaluated the role of Axitinib in second line treatment in not selected mRCC patients.

METHODS

148 mRCC patients were evaluated. According to Heng score 15.5%, 60.1% and 24.4% of patients were at poor risk, intermediate and favorable risk, respectively.

RESULTS

PFS, OS, DCR and ORR were 7.14 months, 15.5 months, 70.6% and 16.6%, respectively. The duration of prior sunitinib treatment correlated with a longer significant mPFS, 8.8 vs 6.3 months, respectively. Axitinib therapy was safe, without grade 4 adverse events. The most frequent toxicities of all grades were: fatigue (50%), hypertension (26%), and hypothyroidism (18%). G3 blood pressure elevation significantly correlated with longer mPFS and mOS compared to G1-G2 or no toxicity. Dose titration (DT) to 7 mg and 10 mg bid was feasible in 24% with no statistically significant differences in mPFS and mOS. The sunitinib-axitinib sequence was safe and effective, the mOS was 41.15 months. At multivariate analysis, gender, DCR to axitinib and to previous sunitinib correlated significantly with PFS; whereas DCR to axitinib, nephrectomy and Heng score independently affected overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Axitinib was effective and safe in a not selected real life mRCC population. Trial registration INT - Napoli - 11/16 oss. Registered 20 April 2016. http://www.istitutotumori.na.it.

Polymorphic Variants in NR1I3 and UGT2B7 Predict Taxane Neurotoxicity and Have Prognostic Relevance in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study

Taxane-related peripheral neuropathy (TrPN) is a dose-limiting toxicity with important interindividual variability. Genetic polymorphisms in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) genes may account for variability in drug efficacy and/or toxicity. By the use of Affymetrix drug-metabolizing enzyme and transporter microarray platform, in a retrospective case-control study, the correlation between ADME polymorphic variants and grades ≥ 2-3-TrPN was investigated. In a breast cancer (BC) training set, five single-nucleotide polymorphisms in NR1I3 and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)2B7 genes were correlated to grades ≥ 2-3-TrPN protection. By receiver operating characteristic curves, the grades ≥ 2-3-TrPN-related candidate biomarkers in an independent series of 54 patients with BC (17 cases and 37 controls) were validated. NR1I3 was correlated to paclitaxel-TrPN and UGT2B7 to docetaxel-TrPN. Moreover, a genetic signature of prognostic relevance for BC outcome was found. Our findings might have potential relevance for personalized management of patients with BC for prevention of treatment failure in ultrametabolizer genetic variants.

A randomized phase II study comparing cabazitaxel/prednisone to cabazitaxel alone in docetaxel-pretreated men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): The CABACARE trial

TPS345

Background: In the TROPIC trial, cabazitaxel (CAB) plus daily prednisone (PDN) was associated with a significant advantage in OS and PFS in docetaxel (DOC)-pretreated patients (Pts). Whether daily PDN may significantly contribute to CAB efficacy or improve its safety profile is unknown. In the CHARTEED trial, DOC was administered without daily PDN with no concerns about the lack of efficacy or greater toxicity. Safety data about CAB without PDN are scarce. Corticosteroids present multiple biological effects, which may potentially be either positive, such as those mediated by adrenal androgen and cytokine suppression, or detrimental, such as those associated with the activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and of the androgen receptor (AR). Furthermore, PDN is a CYP3A4 inducer and can potentially negatively affect CAB clearance. Finally, AR-V7 positivity in circulating tumor cells and retinoblastoma (RB) loss/inactivation have been identified as potential mechanisms of resistance to hormonal and chemotherapy treatments in prostate cancer. For this reason, we also aim to evaluate if CAB activity is related to such biomarkers. Methods: CABACARE (EudraCT 2016-005251-25) is a randomized, phase II, open label, multi-center study comparing CAB at 25 mg/m2 q21 plus daily PDN (10 mg) vs CAB at 25 mg/m2 q21 alone in mCRPC pts progressed during or after DOC treatment. The study is designed to test non inferiority in terms of PFS, according PCWG-2, of CAB alone vs CAB plus PDN assuming that the two arms are equally effective (non-inferiority HR = 1.4). Main secondary objectives are: safety, QoL, pain assessment, overall response rate (ORR), PSA response, time to PSA progression, Time to radiological progression; OS; time to skeletal related events . The influence of AR-V7 and RB status measured in circulating epithelial cells at baseline on CAB activity will also be evaluated. A total of 35 Italian centers have started / will start recruiting pts in the CABACARE trial. Of the 220 pts required by the trial design, 43 pts have been enrolled since 30th Nov , 2017 until 2nd Oct, 2018 in 10 different Italian Institutions. Clinical trial information: 2016-005251-25.

Axitinib after Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Cancer: Preliminary Results from Italian "Real-World" SAX Study

Axitinib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, currently approved for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after failure of prior treatment with Sunitinib or cytokine. The present study is an Italian Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis that evaluated the outcomes of Axitinib, in second-line treatment of mRCC. The medical records of 62 patients treated with Axitinib, were retrospectively reviewed. The Progression Free Survival (PFS), the Overall Survival (OS), the Objective Response Rate (ORR), the Disease Control Rate (DCR), and the safety profile of axitinib and sunitinib–axitinib sequence, were the primary endpoint. The mPFS was 5.83 months (95% CI 3.93–7.73 months). When patients was stratified by Heng score, mPFS was 5.73, 5.83, 10.03 months according to poor, intermediate, and favorable risk group, respectively. The mOS from the start of axitinib was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.6–17.9 months); the observed ORR and DCR were 25 and 71%, respectively. When stratified patients by subgroups defined by duration of prior therapy with Sunitinib (≤ vs. >median duration), there was a statistically significant difference in mPFS with 8.9 (95% CI 4.39–13.40 months) vs. 5.46 months (95% CI 4.04–6.88 months) for patients with a median duration of Sunitinib >13.2 months. DCR and ORR to previous Sunitinib treatment was associated with longer statistically mPFS, 7.23 (95% CI 3.95–10.51 months, p = 0.01) and 8.67 (95% CI 4.0–13.33 months, p = 0.008) vs. 2.97 (95% CI 0.65–5.27 months, p = 0.01) and 2.97 months (95% CI 0.66–5.28 months, p = 0.01), respectively. Overall Axitinib at standard schedule of 5 mg bid, was well-tolerated. The most common adverse events of all grades were fatig (25.6%), hypertension (22.6%), gastro-intestinal disorders (25.9%), and hypothyroidism (16.1%). The sequence Sunitinib–Axitinib was well-tolerated without worsening in side effects, with a median OS of 34.7 months (95% CI 18.4–51.0 months). Our results are consistent with the available literature; this retrospective analysis confirms that Axitinib is effective and safe in routine clinical practice.

Phase II study of temozolomide plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of brain metastases from solid tumours

OBJECTIVE

A combination regimen of temozolomide (TMZ) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has been evaluated in the treatment of brain metastases from solid tumours.

STUDY DESIGN

Nineteen consecutive patients (pts) have been enrolled in a prospective phase II trial and treated with TMZ 200 mg/m2 (days 1-5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 (day 1) every 28 days. The study was prospectively projected according to the Simon's two-stage optimal design.

RESULTS

Major toxicities have been grade III neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in one patient (pt) and grade III erythrodisesthesia in two pts. Three pts achieved a complete response (CR) and four a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 36.8% (95% CI: 19.1-59.2), which exceeded the target activity in the study design. A significant improvement in quality of life was demonstrated by FACT-G analysis. The median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 5.5 (95% CI: 2.7-8.2) months while the median Overall Survival (OS) was 10.0 months (95% CI: 6.3-13.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The TMZ/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin regimen was well tolerated with an encouraging activity in brain metastases from solid tumours.

Antitumor Therapeutic Strategies Based on the Targeting of Epidermal Growth Factor-Induced Survival Pathways

Cellular receptors for the Epidermal Growth Factor are considered important targets for the experimental treatment of human cancer. Monoclonal antibodies as well as small tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been developed and have undergone extensive evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies. Most of these studies have been conceived on the general idea that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a critical role on the growth and survival of human tumors. This assumption has been derived by the successful development of BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in human chronic myeloid leukemia as well as on the activity of antiCD20 monoclonal antibodies in lymphoproliferative disease and of anti HER2 agents in breast tumors overexpressing the targeted antigens. It is now becoming clear that factors regulating sensitivity to kinase inhibitors may differ from monoclonal antibodies and that the molecules targeted by interferring drugs must be prioritaire for growth and survival of those specific tumors in order to achieve valuable results. Recent evidence of major responses to the EGFR inhibitor Gefitinib in tumors harboring activating mutations in the EGFR appears on line with this concept. In this article we will discuss the significance of targeting the EGFR driven survival pathways. Specifically, we will afford the point of EGFR survival signalling prioritization by means of pharmacological treatment. Finally, we will address the role of profiling technologies and of novel computational system biology-based approaches for identification of innovative strategies for effective targeting of EGFR driven survival pathways.