1
|
Jimenez-Rodriguez TW, de Las Vecillas L, Labella M, Lynch DM, Besz KM, Marquis K, Burgos A, Soriano Gomis V, Lozano I, Antón RAM, de la Calle FM, González Delgado MP, Gutiérrez A, Montenegro E, Rodríguez F, Fernández Sánchez FJ, Castells M. Differential presentation of hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin and oxaliplatin: Phenotypes, endotypes, and management with desensitization. Allergy 2024; 79:679-689. [PMID: 37916741 DOI: 10.1111/all.15940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to platinum-based drugs are heterogenous and restrict their access, and drug desensitization (DD) has provided a ground-breaking procedure for their re-introduction, although the response is heterogeneous. We aimed to identify the phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers of reactions to carboplatin and oxaliplatin and their response to DD. METHODS Seventy-nine patients presenting with DHRs to oxaliplatin (N = 46) and carboplatin (N = 33) were evaluated at the Allergy Departments of two tertiary care hospitals in Spain. Patient symptoms, skin testing, biomarkers, and outcomes of 267 DDs were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Oxaliplatin-reactive patients presented with type I (74%), cytokine release reaction (CRR) (11%), and mixed (Mx) (15%) phenotypes. In contrast, carboplatin reactive patients presented with predominantly type I (85%) and Mx (15%) but no CRRs. Out of 267 DDs, breakthrough reactions (BTRs) to oxaliplatin occurred twice as frequently as carboplatin (32% vs. 15%; p < .05). Phenotype switching from type I to another phenotype was observed in 46% of oxaliplatin DDs compared to 21% of carboplatin DDs. Tryptase was elevated in type I and Mx reactions, and IL-6 in CRR and Mx, indicating different mechanisms and endotypes. CONCLUSION Carboplatin and oxaliplatin induced three different types of reactions with defined phenotypes and endotypes amendable to DD. Although most of the initial reactions for both were type I, oxaliplatin presented with unique CRR reactions. During DD, carboplatin reactive patients presented mostly type I BTR, while oxaliplatin-reactive patients frequently switched from type I to CRR, providing a critical difference and the need for personalized DD protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodorikez-Wilfox Jimenez-Rodriguez
- Allergy Section, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
- ARADyAL Spanish Network (RD16/0006), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECyT), Madrid, Spain
| | - Leticia de Las Vecillas
- Allergy Section, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
- Department of Allergy, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Labella
- ARADyAL Spanish Network (RD16/0006), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECyT), Madrid, Spain
- Allergy Clinical Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Donna-Marie Lynch
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kylie Marie Besz
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathleen Marquis
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amparo Burgos
- Pharmacy Department, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - Victor Soriano Gomis
- Allergy Section, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
- ARADyAL Spanish Network (RD16/0006), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECyT), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Lozano
- Oncology Section, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - Rosa Ana Montoyo Antón
- Oncology Day Hospital Nursing Service, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - Francisco Marco de la Calle
- Immunology Section, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - María Purificación González Delgado
- Allergy Section, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
- ARADyAL Spanish Network (RD16/0006), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECyT), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Aurora Gutiérrez
- Allergy Section, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Estefanía Montenegro
- Allergy Section, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Fernando Rodríguez
- Allergy Section, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Fernández Sánchez
- Allergy Section, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
- ARADyAL Spanish Network (RD16/0006), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECyT), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Mariana Castells
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Somoza ML, Pérez-Sánchez N, Victorio-Puche L, Martín-Pedraza L, Esteban Rodríguez A, Blanca-López N, Abel Fernández González E, Ruano-Zaragoza M, Prieto-Moreno Pfeifer A, Fernández Caldas E, Morán Morales M, Fernández Sánchez FJ, López Sánchez JD, Jiménez Rodríguez TW, Subiza Garrido-Lestache JL, Canto Díez G, Blanca Gómez M, Cornejo-García JA. Subjects develop tolerance to Pru p 3 but respiratory allergy to Pru p 9: A large study group from a peach exposed population. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0255305. [PMID: 34411133 PMCID: PMC8376049 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Peach tree allergens are present in fruit, pollen, branches, and leaves, and can induce systemic, respiratory, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal symptoms. We studied the capacity of peach fruit/Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4, Pru p 7 and peach pollen/Pru p 9 for inducing symptoms following oral or respiratory exposure in a large group of subjects. We included 716 adults (aged 21 to 83 y.o.) exposed to peach tree pollen and fruit intake in the study population. Participants completed a questionnaire and were skin tested with a panel of inhalant and food allergens, including peach tree pollen, Pru p 9 and peach fruit skin extract. Immunoglobulin E antibodies (SIgE) to Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4 and Pru p 7 were quantified. Sensitised subjects underwent oral food challenge with peach fruit and nasal provocation test with peach tree pollen and Pru p 9. The prevalence of sensitisation to peach fruit was 5% and most of these had SIgE to Pru p 3, with a very low proportion to Pru p 4 SIgE and no SIgE to Pru p 1 and Pru p 7. In only 1.8%, anaphylaxis was the clinical entity induced. Cases with positive skin tests to peach and SIgE to Pru p 3 presented a good tolerance after oral challenge with peach fruit. The prevalence of skin sensitisation to peach tree pollen was 22%, with almost half recognising Pru p 9. This induced respiratory symptoms in those evaluated by nasal provocation. In a large population group exposed to peach fruit and peach tree pollen, most individuals were tolerant, even in those with SIgE to Pru p 3. A positive response to Pru p 9 was associated with respiratory allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Luisa Somoza
- Allergy Department, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Natalia Pérez-Sánchez
- Allergy Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga-IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Laura Martín-Pedraza
- Allergy Department, Fundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biomédica (FIIB) de los Hospitales Universitarios Infanta Leonor y Sureste, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - María Ruano-Zaragoza
- Allergy Department, General University Hospital of Alicante- ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Miguel Blanca Gómez
- Allergy Department, Fundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biomédica (FIIB) de los Hospitales Universitarios Infanta Leonor y Sureste, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|