Whitler C, McClellan B, Patel H, Rajpurohit D, Kalaba F, Kado H, David S, Shah D. Improved left atrial appendage closure procedural efficiency using radiofrequency transseptal wire system.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023;
101:460-467. [PMID:
36626294 DOI:
10.1002/ccd.30550]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The radiofrequency (RF) needle has been shown to improve transseptal puncture efficiency and safety compared to mechanical needles. This study aimed to investigate the use of VersaCross RF transseptal wire system (Baylis Medical) to improve procedural efficiency of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) compared to the standard RF needle-based workflow.
METHODS
Eighty-one LAAC procedures using WATCHMAN FLX were retrospectively analyzed comparing the standard RF needle-based workflow to a RF wire-based workflow. Study primary endpoint was time to WATCHMAN device release, and secondary endpoints were transseptal puncture time, LAAC success, fluoroscopy use, and procedural complications.
RESULTS
Twenty-five cases using standard RF needle-based workflow were compared to 56 cases using the RF wire-based workflow. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between both groups. LAAC was successful in all patients with no differences in intraprocedural complication rates (p = 0.40). Transseptal puncture time was 1.3 min faster using the RF wire-based workflow compared to the standard RF needle-based workflow (6.5 ± 2.3 vs. 7.8 ± 2.3 min, p = 0.02). Overall, time to final WATCHMAN device release was 4.5 min faster with the RF wire-based workflow compared to the RF needle-based workflow (24.6 ± 5.6 vs. 29.1 ± 9.6 min, p = 0.01). Fluoroscopy time was 21% lower using the RF wire-based workflow (7.6 ± 2.8 vs. 9.6 ± 4.4 min; p = 0.05) and fluoroscopy dose was 67% lower (47.1 ± 35.3 vs. 144.9 ± 156.9 mGy, p = 0.04) and more consistent (F-test, p ˂ 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
The RF wire-based workflow streamlines LAAC procedures, improving LAAC efficiency and safety by reducing fluoroscopy, device exchanges, and delivery sheath manipulation.
Collapse