The Room Where It Happens: Clinician Reflections on Returning Preclinical Alzheimer's Biomarker Results to Research Participants

Disclosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers to research participants is a growing practice. Here, we aim to synthesize the experiences of clinicians leading preclinical AD biomarker disclosure. Semi-structured interviews were conducted individually with each of the four clinicians conducting biomarker disclosure as a part of a longitudinal, observational AD cohort study. Study clinicians emphasized the importance of participant education, having adequate time available for the disclosure visit, and forms to facilitate disclosure. To train and support future clinicians conducting AD biomarker disclosure, our study clinicians highlighted providing information about AD and biomarkers, shadowing a disclosure visit, having team debriefing sessions, and collating a frequently asked questions document. To date, this is the first characterization of clinician reflections on disclosing AD biomarker result to cognitively unimpaired research participants. As more clinicians in research or clinical settings seek to disclose AD biomarker results, best practices for training clinicians to lead disclosure are necessary.

Anticipated reactions to learning Alzheimer's disease biomarker results

INTRODUCTION

We developed the Alzheimer's Biomarker Survey to assess willingness to enroll in biomarker studies that disclose results and anticipated reactions to an elevated biomarker result.

METHODS

Participants included cognitively unimpaired adults enrolled in longitudinal AD studies (n = 334, mean age = 64.8 ± 7.7, 44% non-Hispanic Black or African American). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses determined the latent structure comprising anticipated reactions to learning AD biomarker results. Measurement invariance was tested across racial groups.

RESULTS

Two models comprising behavior change and psychological impact fit well for the total sample and the two racial groups. The 2-factor behavior change model assessed constructs of planning and dementia risk-reduction. The 3-factor psychological impact model assessed constructs of distress, cognitive symptoms, and stigma. Both models exhibited measurement invariance across racial groups.

DISCUSSION

The 28-item Anticipated Reactions to AD Biomarker Disclosure scale is a reliable and valid measure of anticipated reactions when communicating AD biomarker results to research participants.

Predictors of Willingness to Enroll in Hypothetical Alzheimer Disease Biomarker Studies that Disclose Personal Results

INTRODUCTION

We examined factors related to willingness to enroll in hypothetical Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarker studies.

METHODS

Using linear regression, we assessed the relationship among enrollment willingness and demographics, family dementia history, research attitudes, concern about AD, experiences of discrimination, and belief in AD risk modifiability. Inductive coding was used to assess qualitative data.

RESULTS

In middle-aged and older adult AD research participants (n=334), willingness to enroll in biomarker studies was driven by biomarker collection method, research attitudes, and disclosure of personal results. Predictors of willingness were similar for Black and White participants. Themes associated with increased willingness included a desire to learn biomarker results and support research.

DISCUSSION

Research attitudes were an important predictor of biomarker study willingness regardless of race. As seen elsewhere, Black participants were more hesitant to participate in biomarker research. Disclosure of biomarker results/risk can bolster willingness to enroll in biomarker studies, particularly for Black participants.