1
|
Tingleff EB, Hounsgaard L, Bradley SK, Wilson RL, Gildberg FA. A Matter of Trust and Distrust: A Qualitative Investigation of Parents' Perceptions About the Use of Mechanical Restraint on Their Adult Children in a Forensic Psychiatric Setting. J Forensic Nurs 2019; 15:120-130. [PMID: 31116178 DOI: 10.1097/jfn.0000000000000237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increased knowledge about forensic psychiatric patients' relatives' perceptions in regard to the use of mechanical restraint (MR) is necessary, if clinical practice is to be improved and to achieve a reduction in the use and frequency of MR. However, a specific knowledge deficit about relatives' perspectives on the use of MR limits the evidence base considerably. AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions of MR held by relatives of forensic psychiatric patients' including factors impacting its use and duration. METHOD Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 parents of patients within a forensic psychiatry setting and thematically analyzed. FINDINGS Two main themes were identified, namely, "care and protection" and "inclusion and involvement," and one subtheme, "information." These themes revealed the framework used by parents to construct a sense of "trust or distrust" about the ability of staff to provide adequate and safe care for their adult children in the forensic psychiatric setting. CONCLUSION Some parents in this study considered that forensic psychiatric staff used MR as a necessary protection. However, most parents held strong negative perceptions regarding the use of MR and the quality and safety of care provision. It is apparent that parents in this study believed they should be included and involved in the care in situations associated with the use of MR, because they considered that this could reduce its use. Further research is required to target interventions to reduce the use and duration of MR episodes and to improve clinical practice in forensic psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rhonda L Wilson
- Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
| | - Frederik A Gildberg
- Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark
- Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tingleff EB, Hounsgaard L, Bradley SK, Gildberg FA. Forensic psychiatric patients' perceptions of situations associated with mechanical restraint: A qualitative interview study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019; 28:468-479. [PMID: 30341808 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
To reduce the use and duration of mechanical restraint in forensic settings and ensure evidence-based patient care, we need more knowledge about patients' subjective experiences and perceptions. The aim was to investigate forensic psychiatric patients' perceptions of situations associated with the use of mechanical restraint and what they perceive as factors impacting the use and duration of mechanical restraint. Twenty participants were interviewed. Four themes were identified through a thematic analysis: 'overt protest reactions', 'silent protest reactions', 'illness-related behaviour', and 'genuinely calm', which together characterize patients' perceptions of their ways of acting and reacting during mechanical restraint episodes. These themes are linked together in two patterns in the process of mechanical restraint: 'pattern of protest' and 'pattern of illness'. Further research is needed to illuminate the associations between patients' perceptions of being subjected to mechanical restraint and ways of acting and reacting through the process of mechanical restraint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen B Tingleff
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital/Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.,Department of Nursing, UCL University College, Vejle, Denmark.,Health Sciences Research Center, UCL University College, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Lise Hounsgaard
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital/Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Health Sciences Research Center, UCL University College, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.,Institute of Nursing & Health Science, University of Greenland, Nuuk, Greenland
| | | | - Frederik A Gildberg
- Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sørensen T, Tingleff EB, Gildberg FA. Feeling Safe and Taking on Responsibilities: Newly Graduated Nurses' Perceptions and Evaluations of Their Transition Into a Forensic Mental Health Inpatient Setting. J Forensic Nurs 2018; 14:126-134. [PMID: 29601414 DOI: 10.1097/jfn.0000000000000190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Forensic mental health care is faced with serious problems in the recruitment and retention of newly graduated nurses (NGNs). Research into NGNs' experiences of their transition to and evaluations of transition programs in forensic care is sparse, and more studies are called for. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of NGNs' experiences and perceptions of their transition into a forensic setting and their evaluations of the introduction period. Three focus group interviews were carried out, involving 13 NGNs, lasting 79.68 minutes on average. They were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results show two main themes: "feeling safe" and "taking on responsibilities." If NGNs felt overburdened with clinical responsibilities during their transition, their feeling of safety reduced. The converse also applied; theThe safer they felt, the greater clinical responsibility they felt capable of handling. The more difficult the NGNs perceived the informal transition, the more unsafe they felt, and the more negatively they perceived the responsibilities placed upon them. Tailored programs designed to support both the informal and formal transitions are recommended, along with preceptorship, theoretical training, and role-based support, such as a shift manager, along with early introduction to conflict management and security measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Frederik A Gildberg
- Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tingleff EB, Bradley SK, Gildberg FA, Munksgaard G, Hounsgaard L. "Treat me with respect". A systematic review and thematic analysis of psychiatric patients' reported perceptions of the situations associated with the process of coercion. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2017; 24:681-698. [PMID: 28665512 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Psychiatric patients have generally negative experiences of being exposed to coercive measures. Existing research has generally not investigated coercion as a process; that is, it does not address issues that arise before, during and after exposure to coercion. A part of existing research within the area does not clarify and define the type of coercive measure(s) investigated. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Patients place great significance on the link between the positive and negative perceived impact of a coercive situation and the professionals' ability and willingness to interact and communicate respectfully. Psychiatric patients associate the use of seclusion, physical restraint/holding, mechanical restraint and forced medication with strong negative perceptions and wish to be treated with respect by professionals, rather than being subjected to the professionals' control. What patients perceive as moderating factors in regard to the use of coercive measures is currently under-researched. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Increased sensitivity to the patient's views of the situation at each point in the coercive process would help professionals to respond to the patients' individual needs. Professionals need to articulate concern and empathy towards patients and to improve communication skills before, during and after a coercive incident. Greater emphasis should be placed on de-escalation and the use of non-coercive strategies or coping skills before the initiation of coercive measures. ABSTRACT Introduction There is a lack of research into psychiatric patients' perceptions of coercion that discriminates between different types of coercive measures, while also investigating patients' perceptions of undergoing coercion as a process. This knowledge is required to improve our understanding and provide a foundation for improving clinical practice. Aims To review existing research literature in order to investigate adult psychiatric patients' reported perceptions of situations before, during and after specific and defined types of coercive measures, and to investigate what patients perceive as moderating factors, in regard to the use of these coercive measures. Method A systematic review and thematic analysis of 26 peer-reviewed studies was undertaken. Results The analysis identified six themes and additional subthemes, where "interactions with professionals" and "communication" were predominant themes across the timeline of coercion. Altogether, themes were associated with either "positive or negative patient-perceived impact." Implications for practice Increased sensitivity to patients' views of the situation at each point in the process is desirable in order to respond to the patients' individual needs. Professionals also need to articulate concern and empathy towards the patient and to improve communication skills before, during and after a coercive incident. Use of de-escalation and noncoercive strategies is required. Relevance statement Coercion within psychiatric/mental health care remains controversial, and repeated international calls have recommended a reduction of their use. This review indicates that greater attention to how patients perceive the use of coercive measures (before, during, and after incidents) needs to be considered in order to improve the evidence-based and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E B Tingleff
- Department of Clinical Research, Odense Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.,The Department of Nursing, University College Lillebaelt, Vejle, Denmark.,Health Sciences Research Center, University College Lillebaelt, Vejle, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - S K Bradley
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork, Cork, UK
| | - F A Gildberg
- Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - G Munksgaard
- Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - L Hounsgaard
- Department of Clinical Research, Odense Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Health Sciences Research Center, University College Lillebaelt, Vejle, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Institute of Nursing & Health Science, University of Greenland, Nuuk, Greenland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gildberg FA, Paaske KJ, Rasmussen VL, Nissen RD, Bradley SK, Hounsgaard L. Humor: Power Conveying Social Structures Inside Forensic Mental Health Nursing. J Forensic Nurs 2016; 12:120-128. [PMID: 27496647 DOI: 10.1097/jfn.0000000000000118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
According to research literature, humor inside the staff-patient interaction seems to be significant in the area of forensic mental healthcare. However, existing literature on the subject is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of the use humor by forensic mental health staff members in interactions with forensic mental health inpatients. The study included 32 forensic mental health staff members, used 307 hours of participant observations, 48 informal interviews, and seven formal semistructured interviews. Outcomes identify four themes concerning the conveyance of power to, from, and between forensic mental health staff and patients as they interact: (a) "the informal use: the human-to-human approach," characterized by an informal use of humor and without any reference to mental health issues; (b) the "formal use of humor: the staff-patient approach," characterized as formal with a view on the patient as mentally ill, unable to understand humor, and with the aim of using humor to prevent conflicts or negative behavior; (c) "protest against requested care: the human-patient approach," characterized by the use of humor as a protest against requested care; and the use of (d) "inadequacy humor: the staff-human approach," characterized by the use of inadequacy-humor referring to, for example, patients' physical features. Recommendations and clinical implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik A Gildberg
- Author Affiliations: 1Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry Middelfart 2 Center for Psychiatric Nursing & Health Research (CPS), Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark; 3Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork; 4OPEN, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark; and 5Health Sciences Research Centre, University College Lillebaelt
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Birkeland S, Gildberg FA. Mental Health Nursing, Mechanical Restraint Measures and Patients' Legal Rights. Open Nurs J 2016; 10:8-14. [PMID: 27123152 PMCID: PMC4820532 DOI: 10.2174/1874434601610010008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2015] [Revised: 06/02/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Coercive mechanical restraint (MR) in psychiatry constitutes the perhaps most extensive exception from the common health law requirement for involving patients in health care decisions and achieving their informed consent prior to treatment. Coercive measures and particularly MR seriously collide with patient autonomy principles, pose a particular challenge to psychiatric patients' legal rights, and put intensified demands on health professional performance. Legal rights principles require rationale for coercive measure use be thoroughly considered and rigorously documented. This article presents an in-principle Danish Psychiatric Complaint Board decision concerning MR use initiated by untrained staff. The case illustrates that, judicially, weight must be put on the patient perspective on course of happenings and especially when health professional documentation is scant, patients' rights call for taking notice of patient evaluations. Consequently, if it comes out that psychiatric staff failed to pay appropriate consideration for the patient's mental state, perspective, and expressions, patient response deviations are to be judicially interpreted in this light potentially rendering MR use illegitimated. While specification of law criteria might possibly improve law use and promote patients' rights, education of psychiatry professionals must address the need for, as far as possible, paying due regard to meeting patient perspectives and participation principles as well as formal law and documentation requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soren Birkeland
- Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark & Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Frederik A Gildberg
- Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark & Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gildberg FA, Fristed P, Makransky G, Moeller EH, Nielsen LD, Bradley SK. As time goes by: reasons and characteristics of prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint in forensic psychiatry. J Forensic Nurs 2015; 11:41-50. [PMID: 25622065 DOI: 10.1097/jfn.0000000000000055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Evidence suggests the prevalence and duration of mechanical restraint are particularly high among forensic psychiatric inpatients. However, only sparse knowledge exists regarding the reasons for, and characteristics of, prolonged use of mechanical restraint in forensic psychiatry. This study therefore aimed to investigate prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint on forensic psychiatric inpatients. Documentary data from medical records were thematically analyzed. Results show that the reasons for prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint on forensic psychiatric inpatients can be characterized by multiple factors: "confounding" (behaviors associated with psychiatric conditions, substance abuse, medical noncompliance, etc.), "risk" (behaviors posing a risk for violence), and "alliance parameters" (qualities of the staff-patient alliance and the patients' openness to alliance with staff), altogether woven into a mechanical restraint spiral that in itself becomes a reason for prolonged mechanical restraint. The study also shows lack of consistent clinical assessment during periods of restraint. Further investigation is indicated to develop an assessment tool with the capability to reduce time spent in mechanical restraint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik A Gildberg
- Author Affiliations: 1Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark; 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark; 3Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark; 4Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark; and 5Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College, Cork
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Humor utilized in the practice of forensic mental health nursing might seem somehow inappropriate, given the serious circumstances surrounding most forensic mental health patients. However, some recent research has pointed to the use of humor as an important component in staff interactions with forensic mental health patients. This study reviews the existing international forensic mental health research literature on humor to investigate (a) what characterizes forensic mental health staff-patient use of humor and (b) what significance humor holds within the forensic mental health setting. The search was conducted in June 2013. Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, and PsychINFO were searched using keywords relevant to the study. Articles were categorized using a literature matrix and analyzed using thematic analysis. Twelve research articles were reviewed and included in the analysis. Three themes were identified: (a) "humor as staff skill," showing that staff found humor to be important as an interpersonal ability; (b) "humor as a relational tool" with the purpose of establishing and maintaining staff-patient interactions; and (c) "the impact of humor on patients," describing impacts on conflicts, dimensions of health, and motivation. The results of the analysis are however limited because of the dearth of published articles on the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik A Gildberg
- Author Affiliations: 1Research Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark; 2School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway; 3University College Lillebaelt, Nursing Education in Odense; and 4Research Unit of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gildberg FA, Bradley SK, Fristed P, Hounsgaard L. Reconstructing normality: characteristics of staff interactions with forensic mental health inpatients. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2012; 21:103-13. [PMID: 22321258 DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00786.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Forensic psychiatry is an area of priority for the Danish Government. As the field expands, this calls for increased knowledge about mental health nursing practice, as this is part of the forensic psychiatry treatment offered. However, only sparse research exists in this area. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of forensic mental health nursing staff interaction with forensic mental health inpatients and to explore how staff give meaning to these interactions. The project included 32 forensic mental health staff members, with over 307 hours of participant observations, 48 informal interviews, and seven semistructured interviews. The findings show that staff interaction is typified by the use of trust and relationship-enabling care, which is characterized by the establishment and maintenance of an informal, trusting relationship through a repeated reconstruction of normality. The intention is to establish a trusting relationship to form behaviour and perceptual-corrective care, which is characterized by staff's endeavours to change, halt, or support the patient's behaviour or perception in relation to staff's perception of normality. The intention is to support and teach the patient normal behaviour by correcting their behaviour, and at the same time, maintaining control and security by staying abreast of potential conflicts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik A Gildberg
- Research Unit of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
In Denmark the increasing number of forensic mental health patients has led to prioritized services, including the area of nursing; however, this field is subject to sparse research. The aim of this study was to review existing research literature and in doing so investigate what characterizes forensic mental health staff interaction with forensic mental health inpatients and furthermore to investigate what significance these staff characteristics have for the inpatients. The literature review spans the period September 1997 to January 2009 and was based on a systematic keyword combination search in the following databases: CINAHL, CSB, PsycINFO, Scopus, Pubmed, MEDLINE and Sociological Abstracts. The articles were categorized using a literature matrix and analysed using content analysis. Seventeen quantitative and qualitative research studies were analysed. The results show that the interaction between forensic staff and forensic inpatients is characterized by two overriding themes: parentalistic & behaviour-changing care and relational & personal quality-dependent care. Only a few of the findings represent a clear account of how the interactional characteristics impact on the forensic inpatient. The conclusion is that no clear account of the patient impact issue can be reached at this point and that further investigation needs to take place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F A Gildberg
- Research Unit of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C,Denmark.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|