Learning and implementation of TransREctus sheath PrePeritoneal procedure for inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

The TransREctus sheath PrePeritoneal procedure (TREPP) was introduced as an alternative open and preperitoneal technique for inguinal hernia mesh repair, demonstrating safety and efficacy in retro- and prospective studies. However, little is known about the technique's inherent learning curve. In this study, we aimed to determine TREPP learning curve effects after its implementation in high-volume surgical practice.

METHODS

All primary, unilateral TREPP procedures performed in the first three years after implementation (between January 2016 and December 2018) were included out of a large preconstructed regional inguinal hernia database. Data were analyzed on outcome (i.e., surgical complications, hernia recurrences, postoperative pain). Learning curve effects were analyzed by assessing outcome in relation to surgeon experience.

RESULTS

In total, 422 primary, unilateral TREPP procedures were performed in 419 patients. In three patients a unilateral TREPP procedure was performed on both sides separated in time. A total of 99 surgical complications were registered in 83 procedures (19.6% of all procedures), most commonly inguinal postoperative pain (8%) and bleeding complications (7%). Hernia recurrences were observed in 17 patients (4%). No statistically significant differences on outcome were found between different surgeon experience (< 40 procedures, 40-80 procedures, > 80 procedures).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of TREPP seems not to be associated with a notable increase of adverse events. We were not able to detect a clear learning curve limit, potentially suggesting a relatively short learning curve among already experienced hernia surgeons compared to other guideline techniques.

Innovative biochemisurgical treatment for stabilisation of an end-stage chronic wound in a complex vascular compromized patient

INTRODUCTION

Treating advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease (e.g. PAOD IV) poses a significant challenge, as conventional treatments quite often fall short at this stage. However, a range of interventions can be considered to postpone amputation. This study presents an example of advanced stage of Peripheral Artery Occlusive Disease (PAOD) stage IV, encompassing a history of a high thigh amputation on the left side, coupled with pronounced wound healing disorders.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Our patient, 55 years old, smoker and ASA Class III is in a left sided above-the knee-amputation situation. He presented to our outpatient clinic with blistering in the stump area, caused by non-proportinate pressure from the prosthesis. With an emerging septic course and advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) at Fontaine class IV, revascularization was unfeasible in the left iliac artery axis and groin arteries. Additionally, a stage PAOD IV presents itself with poorly healing wounds on the right side which our patient still uses to support his transfers in and out bed and his wheelchair. Multiple surgical stump revisions and femur shortenings and diverse wound treatments were performed all were unsatisfying for patient and practitioners. We introduced a novel biochemisurgical treatment in our teaching hospital.

DISCUSSION

Desiccating-agent-A is an innovative dehydrating agent with potent desiccating characteristics upon application to organic substances. Its formulation involves blending 83% methane sulfonic acid with proton acceptors and dimethyl sulfoxide, as outlined in patent application. The case description results in an illustrated follow up period of 16 months and is presented in line with the recommendations of the consensus-based surgical case reporting guideline development.

CONCLUSION

The goal of achieving a secondary healing trend is to establish stability within the wound area or achieve complete healing. This endeavor becomes particularly intricate when severe blood circulation compromise exists. Nonetheless, progress in wound treatment measures has made it feasible to achieve this aim by fostering the formation of dry and clean necrotic tissue. This dry and clean wound is now manageable in a patient's home situation, allowing for effective care and a better chance at preventing further severe complications.

Case report: Incarcerated obturator hernia, initially presenting as right hip pain!

INTRODUCTION

An incarcerated Obturator herniation is a rare external abdominal hernia. Abdominal CT-scanning is the first choice for the diagnosis of such an incarcerated Obturator hernia. Since intestinal incarceration leads to acute necrosis. Therefore emergency surgical treatment is required. However, due to the lack of specificity of the clinical manifestations of incarcerated Obturator hernia, a delay in adequate diagnostics may be higher than expected.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

An 82 year woman was admitted to the hospital because of right hip joint pain. She was initially evaluated and admitted by orthopedics team for suspected arthritis. A CT-scan with contrast was ordered, which showed an intestinal ischemic obstruction in a right sided obturator hernia, an acute laparotomy was carried out.

DISCUSSION

This case is important and differs from the well-known similar cases through the emergency admission at the orthopedic department because of the clear right hip pain and clinical history from the patient. An Obturator herniation (OH) is a rare external abdominal hernia accounting for only 0.07 %-1 % of all hernia cases. Because the female pelvis is wider which can lead to herniation of abdominal contents. The Howship-Romberg sign should be checked during physical examination.

CONCLUSION

Obturator hernia is very rare and difficult to diagnose. Moreover when elderly women suffer from long-term chronic diseases, a very thin body, or a history of multiple deliveries. Howship-Romberg sign should be checked in these situations during physical examination. Early diagnosis and treatment significantly reduces the occurrence of intestinal perforation, necrosis, sepsis and/or other severe adverse events, thereby, a significant prognostic improvement of patients.

Editor's Choice - Nationwide Analysis of Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair.

Emergency TREPP for Strangulated Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Consecutive Case Series

Background  Patients with strangulated inguinal hernia (SIH) require emergency surgical treatment. International guidelines do not specify the surgical technique of preference. Frequently, an open anterior approach such as the Lichtenstein technique is used. The TransREctus sheath Pre-Peritoneal (TREPP) technique is an alternative, open posterior approach, which has shown promising results in the elective treatment of inguinal hernias. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the TREPP technique in the emergency setting of SIHs. Materials and Methods  After medical ethical approval was warranted, all consecutive patients, who underwent emergency TREPP (e-TREPP) at a high-volume hernia institute, were retrospectively included from 2006 up to and including 2016. Data retrieved from the electronic patient files were combined with the findings during a long-term outcome physical investigation at an outpatient department visit. e-TREPP was, prior to the start of the study, defined as TREPP performed immediately at the operation room. Results  Thirty-three patients underwent e-TREPP for SIH. Ten patients were clinically evaluated, ten patients were deceased, nine patients could not be contacted, and four patients did not or could not consent. Of the ten deceased patients, one patient died perioperatively due to massive aspiration followed by cardiac arrest. Nine patients died due to other causes. Two patients developed a recurrence after (after 13 days and 16 months respectively). Two patients were surgically treated for a wound infection (mesh removal in one). No patient reported chronic postoperative inguinal pain. Conclusion  e-TREPP in experienced hands seems feasible and safe (Level of Evidence 4) for the treatment of patients with strangulated inguinal hernia, with percentages of postoperative complications comparable to other techniques.

Long-term results from a randomized comparison of open transinguinal preperitoneal hernia repair and the Lichtenstein method (TULIP trial)

Background

The short‐term results of the TULIP trial comparing transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair with the Lichtenstein method have been reported with follow‐up of 1 year. After TIPP repair, fewer patients had chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP); they had better health status and lower costs. The present study reports the long‐term outcomes of this trial.

Methods

All surviving patients initially randomized in the TULIP trial were contacted. Patients were interviewed by telephone and sent a questionnaire. Those reporting any complaints were invited for outpatient review. Chronic pain, hernia recurrence and reoperation were documented, along with any sensory change or disturbance of sexual activity.

Results

Of 302 patients initially randomized, 251 (83·1 per cent) were included in the analysis (119 TIPP, 132 Lichtenstein), with a median follow‐up of 85 (range 74–117) months. Of 25 patients with chronic postoperative inguinal pain after 1 year, only one, who underwent Lichtenstein repair, still had groin pain at long‐term follow‐up. The overall hernia recurrence rate was 2·8 per cent (7 patients), with no difference between the groups.

Conclusion

Both TIPP and Lichtenstein hernia repairs are durable. Patients with chronic postoperative inguinal pain after 1 year can be reassured that the groin pain tends to fade over time.

Case series of recurrent inguinal hernia after primary TREPP repair: re-TREPP seems feasible and safe

•

Recurrent inguinal hernias are preferably treated via an alternative route, e.g. posterior after anterior.

•

Endoscopic preperitoneal repair techniques are common for groin hernias after Lichtenstein’s plasty.

•

The TREPP technique is a minimal access, open variant of these preperitoneal techniques.

•

The TREPP technique seems to be a safe and feasible technique to use for recurrence after previous TREPP for inguinal hernia repair.

Introduction

The Trans REctussheath PrePeritoneal (TREPP) mesh repair was introduced in 2006 to decrease the risk of postoperative inguinal pain in hernia surgery. For the repair of a recurrent inguinal hernia after a primary TREPP an alternative open anterior route (Lichtenstein) may seem the most logical option, but coincides with an increased risk of chronic postoperative inguinal pain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a second TREPP procedure to repair a recurrent inguinal hernia after an initial TREPP repair.

Methods

Consecutive patients with a recurrent inguinal hernia after a primary TREPP, repaired by a re-TREPP were retrospectively included in the study. Data, retrieved from the electronic patient files, were combined with the clinical findings at the outpatient department where the patients were physically investigated according to a priorly written and registered protocol.

Results

Overall about 1800 TREPPs were performed between 2006 and 2013. Since the introduction of TREPP in 2006, 40 patients presented with a recurrence in our center. From this group 19 patients were re-operated with the TREPP technique. No intraoperative complications occurred. There was one conversion from re-TREPP to Lichtenstein and no re-recurrences occurred to date. Ten out of 19 patients could be clinically evaluated with a mean follow-up period of 37 months (range 11–95). None of these patients (n=10) complained of chronic postoperative inguinal pain. Two patients reported discomfort. One patient died non procedure related, three weeks after re-TREPP of sudden cardiac death.

Conclusion

These first experiences with re-TREPP for secondary inguinal hernia repair are encouraging for the aspects of feasibility and safety, particularly in experienced surgical hands.

Teaching the transrectus sheath preperiotneal mesh repair: TREPP in 9 steps

BACKGROUND

The preperitoneal mesh position seems preferable to reduce the number of patients with postoperative chronic pain after inguinal hernia surgery. The transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair (TREPP) is gaining popularity. Teaching a new technique requires a standardized approach to achieve an optimal learning curve. The aim of this paper was to provide a step-by-step teaching module for hernia surgeons learning the TREPP.

METHODS

Literature was critically reviewed and the forthcoming nine surgical steps of the new TREPP technique and its rationale are described in this article. The TREPP hernia repair technique is illustrated with an online education video and three photos of the anatomical landmarks and the proposed mesh position of TREPP.

RESULTS

The nine steps of TREPP are described extensively and the critical steps are presented in a standardized way for surgical educational purposes. Also the rationale and technical considerations of inguinal hernia experts are presented.

DISCUSSION

TREPP may be a promising technique for groin hernia surgery. To date there have been no major complications with the TREPP repair which is currently the subject of a RCT. The learning curve of TREPP is being investigated and teaching of this technique requires standardization for trainee surgeons.

CONCLUSION

TREPP potentially merges the advantages of a preperitoneal positioned mesh with an open technique. Initial results are promising and TREPP seems to be applicable in different hospitals in the Netherlands. Since the start of an active teaching program, TREPP has been introduced and accepted well by dedicated hernia surgeons in other hospitals in the Netherlands and Europe.

TIPP and Lichtenstein modalities for inguinal hernia repair: a cost minimisation analysis alongside a randomised trial

The transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) technique using a soft mesh with a memory ring was developed recently for inguinal hernia repair. To compare TIPP with the Lichtenstein method, a randomised trial was conducted (ISRCTN93798494). The aim of this study was to perform an economic evaluation of the TIPP modality compared to the Lichtenstein modality from both a hospital and societal perspective alongside the clinical trial. The TULIP study was a double-blind randomised clinical trial comparing two techniques for inguinal hernia repair (TIPP and Lichtenstein). Correct generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, and follow-up were used/applied according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook. Next to the cost drivers, the short-form-36 health survey (SF-36) data from the TULIP trial was used to determine utility. The SF-36 data from the TULIP trial were revised using the SF-6D algorithm according to Brazier. Two scenarios-a hospital and a societal perspective-were presented. If the analyses showed no difference in effects (on the SF-6D) the cost effectiveness decision rule to cost minimisation was altered. No significant difference in SF-6D utility between both modalities was found (mean difference: 0.888, 95% CI -1.02 to 1.23); consequently, the economic decision rule became cost minimisation. For the hospital perspective no significant differences in costs were found (mean difference: euro -13, 95% CI euro -130 to euro 104). However, when including productivity gains in the analysis, significant differences (P = 0.037) in costs favouring the TIPP modality (mean saving: euro 1,472, 95% CI euro 463- euro 2,714) were found. The results show that TIPP is a cost-saving inguinal hernia repair technique compared to the Lichtenstein modality against equal effectiveness expressed as quality adjusted life week at 1 year given a societal perspective. In the trial, TIPP patients showed on average a quicker recovery of 6.5 days compared to Lichtenstein patients.

Randomized clinical trial of chronic pain after the transinguinal preperitoneal technique compared with Lichtenstein's method for inguinal hernia repair

Background

Preliminary experience has suggested that preperitoneal mesh positioning causes less chronic pain than Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial was conducted with the aim of evaluating the incidence of postoperative chronic pain after transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) mesh repair versus Lichtenstein's technique.

Methods

Patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to either TIPP or Lichtenstein's repair in two training hospitals. The primary outcome was the number of patients with chronic pain after surgery. Secondary outcomes were adverse events. Follow-up was scheduled after 14 days, 3 months and 1 year. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded.

Results

A total of 302 patients were randomized to TIPP (143) or Lichtenstein (159) repair. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups. Some 98·0 per cent of the patients were included in the analysis (141 in the TIPP group and 155 in the Lichtenstein group). Significantly fewer patients in the TIPP group had continuous chronic pain 1 year after surgery: five patients (3·5 per cent) versus 20 patients (12·9 per cent) in the Lichtenstein group (P = 0·004). An additional 12 patients (8·5 per cent) in the TIPP group and 60 (38·7 per cent) in the Lichtenstein group experienced pain during activity (P = 0·001). There were two patients with recurrence in the TIPP group and four in the Lichtenstein group, but no significant differences were found in other severe adverse events between the groups.

Conclusion

Fewer patients had continuous chronic pain at 1 year after the TIPP mesh inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein's repair. Registration number: ISRCTN93798494 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Health status one year after TransInguinal PrePeritoneal inguinal hernia repair and Lichtenstein's method: an analysis alongside a randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

The Lichtenstein technique is the treatment of first choice according to guidelines for primary inguinal hernia treatment. Postoperative chronic pain has been reported as complication in 15-40 % after Lichtenstein's repair. The postoperative effects on health status after open preperitoneal hernia repair have hardly been examined. Development of an open technique that combines the safe anterior approach of the Lichtenstein with the 'promising' preperitoneal soft mesh position was done; the transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) mesh repair. A double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial (TULIP trial, ISRCTN93798494) was conducted to compare different outcome parameters after TIPP or Lichtenstein, one parameter is topic of evaluation in this paper; the health status after TIPP and Lichtenstein for inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

The study protocol has been published. It was hypothesized that the health status of inguinal hernia patients would be better after the TIPP repair compared with the Lichtenstein technique. The size of this study was based on chronic pain as primary outcome measure. Three hundred and two patients were randomized. Patients and the outcome assessors were blinded. Follow-up was scheduled after 14 days, 3 months, and 1 year. The three dimensions of possible errors were warranted.

RESULTS

With regard to health status, significant differences were found in the dimensions 'physical pain' [difference: 6.1 (95 % CI 2.3-9.9, p = 0.002)] and 'physical functioning' [difference: 3.5 (95 % CI 0.5-6.7, p = 0.023)], favoring the TIPP patients after 1 year.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the SF-36 'physical function' and 'physical pain' dimensions after TIPP show significant better patient outcomes at 1 year compared with the Lichtenstein patients in this trial. These differences are in line with reported significant differences in less patients with postoperative chronic pain after TIPP compared with Lichtenstein at 1 year.

The transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair for inguinal hernia: technique, rationale, and results of the first 50 cases

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic and endoscopic hernia repair popularized the preperitoneal mesh position due to promising results concerning less chronic pain. However, considerable proportions of severe adverse events, learning curves, or added costs have to be taken into account. Therefore, open preperitoneal mesh techniques may have more advantages. The open approach to the preperitoneal space (PPS) according to transrectus sheath preperitoneal (TREPP) mesh repair is through the sheath of the rectus abdominus muscle. This technique provides an excellent view of the PPS and facilitates elective or acute hernia reduction and mesh positioning under direct vision. In concordance with the promising transinguinal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair experiences in the literature, we investigated the feasibility of TREPP.

METHODS

A rationale description of the surgical technique, available level of evidence for thoughts behind technical considerations. Furthermore, a descriptive report of the clinical outcomes of our pilot case series including 50 patients undergoing the TREPP mesh repair.

RESULTS

A consecutive group of our first 50 patients were operated with the TREPP technique. No technical problems were experienced during the development of this technique. No conversions to Lichtenstein repair were necessary. No recurrences and no chronic pain after a mean follow-up of 2 years were notable findings.

CONCLUSION

This description of the technique shows that the TREPP mesh repair might be a promising method because of the complete preperitoneal view, the short learning curve, and the stay-away-from-the-nerves principle. The rationale of the TREPP repair is discussed in detail.

The transinguinal preperitoneal hernia correction vs Lichtenstein's technique; is TIPP top?

Background

Chronic pain is the main drawback of the Lichtenstein procedure for inguinal hernia repair, with a reported incidence of 15–40%. The transinguinal pre-peritoneal (TIPP) technique seems to be associated with less chronic pain, comparable to the total extra peritoneal (TEP) technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate 3 years of TIPP and Lichtenstein experience since the start of our Hernia Center Brabant in January 2006.

Methods

Patient records of unilateral primary inguinal anterior hernia corrections (TIPP and Lichtenstein) performed since the opening of Hernia Center Brabant (2006–2008) were evaluated in a retrospective study. ASA class 4 and 5, <18 years, recurrences and bilateral hernias were excluded. In the TIPP technique, a Polysoft™ Hernia Patch was placed into the preperitoneal space using an anterior protocol led approach. The Lichtenstein technique was performed as described by Amid [Amid et al (1996) Eur J Surg 162:447–453] and modified with a soft mesh. One of the hernia surgeons decided peroperatively which technique to perform. Baseline characteristics and postoperative complications were assessed retrospectively. The attempted follow up period was 6 months. Chronic pain was assessed in both groups as mild (VAS 1–3), moderate (VAS 4–6) or severe (VAS 7–10). Chronic pain was defined in both groups as any pain sensation lasting longer than 3 months postoperatively, or when local injection of analgesia was necessary. Patients who did not come back because of chronic pain after regular follow up were regarded as free of pain.

Results

A total of 496 patients were included in this study; 225 TIPP and 271 Lichtenstein anterior inguinal hernia operations were analyzed. Data from one TIPP-patient were lost. Both groups were comparable with regard to baseline characteristics regarding age (p = 0.059), gender (p = 0.478) and ASA-classification (p = 0.104). TIPP: mean age 52.7 years, ASA-classification I: 54%, II: 36% and III: 5.3%. A total of 7.6% complications were assessed; recurrence (n = 1), bleeding (and re-operation) (n = 4); 10 patients (4.4%) experienced chronic pain. Persisting sensation loss occurred in 0.9%. Lichtenstein: mean age 57.3 years, ASA-classification I: 51%, II: 38% and III: 11%. A total of 8.5% complications were assessed; recurrence (n = 3), bleeding (and re-operation) (n = 3); 11 Lichtenstein patients (4.1%) experienced chronic pain. Persisting sensation loss occurred in 2.2%. Limitations of this retrospective study were incomplete follow up (31.3% had only one post operative visit 14 days after surgery) and these patients were further regarded as free of pain. Therefore, possible under-reporting of chronic pain could be present. The study was not double blind.

Conclusion

This retrospective study design revealed no significantly better results for the TIPP procedure as compared to the Lichtenstein technique. The incidence of chronic pain reported in this retrospective study has been low in both groups since the opening of the Hernia Center Brabant. These results form the basis for a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the TIPP and Lichtenstein techniques: ISRCTN93798494.

In-one-continuity rectal excision and anal mucosectomy of a giant villous adenoma: an alternative surgical approach

Background

The authors present a woman suffering from McKittrick-Wheelock syndrome (MKWS) with a giant rectal villous adenoma. MKWS is a rare disorder caused by fluid and electrolyte hypersecretion from a rectal tumor. The most frequently reported tumors are villous adenomas. Symptoms of dehydration with severe hyponatremia, hypokalemia, metabolic acidosis and acute renal failure are typical in MKWS. Several options for operation have been reported, such as a transsacral approach (according to Kraske), transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) or total mesorectal excision (TME). In this case we report an alternative surgical approach: in-one-continuity transanal mucosectomy and transabdominal TME with a handsewn colonic-anal anastomosis.

Case

A 54-year-old woman had a history of hospital admissions because of repeated bouts of dehydration with electrolyte disorders since 2004. At admission she presented with prerenal azotemia, hyponatremia and severe hypokalemia in combination with watery stools. At colonoscopy an 8-cm villous adenoma was seen in the rectum. Dehydration and electrolyte disturbances were treated by appropriate intravenous fluid administration. An in-one-continuity anal mucosectomy and complete rectal excision were performed and restored by a handmade colonic-anal anastomosis. Postoperative recovery was uneventful.

Conclusion

MKWS can be a difficult problem to assess in both gastroenterological and nephrological ways. Patients may develop severe complications which require surgical intervention in some cases. In-one-continuity transanal mucosectomy and rectum excision with a handmade colonic-anal anastomosis seemed to be a new and solid surgical therapeutic option in this case.

[Diagnostic image (373). A woman with a wrist injury]

A 39-year-old woman had a car crash. The normal anatomical lines in the left carpometacarpal joints were no longer visible on X-ray: the hand equivalent of the Lisfranc luxation in the foot.