Physiological and angiographic outcomes of PCI in calcified lesions after rotational atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in calcified coronary artery lesions are associated with impaired stent expansion, higher rate of periprocedural complications and cardiac mortality. Lesion preparation using calcium modifying techniques such as Rotational Atherectomy (RA) or Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) has been advocated. Studies comparing these technologies are lacking. We aimed to compare the in-stent pressure gradient, evaluated by virtual fractional flow-reserve, in calcific lesions treated using either RA or IVL.

METHODS

Patients undergoing either RA- or IVL-assisted PCI from two European centers were included. Propensity score matching (1:2) was performed to control for potential bias. Primary outcome was post- PCI in-stent pressure gradient calculated by virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFRgrad). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with complete functional revascularization defined as of distal vFFR post PCI (vFFRpost) ≥ 0.90.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 210 patients, 105 matched patients (70 RA and 35 IVL) were included. Pre-PCI vFFR did not differ between groups (0,65 ± 0,13 RA and 0,67 ± 0,11 IVL). After PCI, in-stent pressure gradients were significantly lower in the IVL group (0.032 ± 0.026 vs 0.043 ± 0.026 in the RA group, p = 0.024). The proportions of vessels with functional complete revascularization was similar between the two groups (32.9% vs. 37.1% in the RA and IVL group, respectively; p = 0.669).

CONCLUSIONS

Calcific lesions preparation with IVL is effective and resulted in improved in-stent pressure gradient compared to RA. Approximately one third of the patients undergoing PCI for a severely calcified lesion achieved functional revascularization with no difference between rotational RA and IVL.

Physiological and angiographic outcomes of PCI in calcified lesions after rotational atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy

Background

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in calcified coronary artery lesions is associated with impaired stent expansion, higher rate of periprocedural complications and cardiac mortality. Lesion preparation using dedicated calcium modifying techniques such as RA or IVL has been advocated. Studies comparing these technologies are lacking.

Objectives

To compare the in-stent pressure gradient, evaluated by virtual fractional flow-reserve, in calcific lesions treated using either rotational atherectomy (RA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL).

Methods

Patients undergoing either RA- or IVL-assisted PCI from two European centers were included. Propensity score matching (1:2) was performed to control for potential bias. Primary outcome was post- PCI in-stent pressure gradient calculated by virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFRgrad, calculated as the difference between the vFFR at the proximal minus distal edge of the stent). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with complete functional revascularization defined as of distal vFFR post PCI (vFFRpost) ≥0.90.

Results

From a cohort of 210 patients, 105 matched patients (70 RA and 35 IVL) were included. Pre-PCI vFFR did not differ between groups (0,65±0,13 RA and 0,67±0,11 IVL). After PCI, in-stent pressure gradient was significantly lower in the IVL group (0.032±0.026 vs 0.043±0.026 in the RA group, p=0.024). The proportion of vessels with functional complete revascularization was similar between the two groups (32.9% vs. 37.1% in the RA and IVL group, respectively; p=0.669)

Conclusions

Calcific lesions preparation with IVL is effective and resulted in improved in-stent pressure gradient compared to RA. Approximately one third of the patients undergoing PCI for a severely calcified lesion achieved functional revascularization with no difference between rotational RA and IVL.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. In stent gradients after RA and IVL

Quantification of calcium volume by coronary CT compared to OCT

Background

Coronary artery calcifications are frequently observed in patients referred for cardiac catheterization. Using OCT, the calcified volume can be determined. CT is a sensitive non-invasive tool to detect coronary artery calcifications and may be useful to guide percutaneous coronary intervention.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of CT-derived calcium volume with OCT as a reference in patients undergoing PCI.

Methods

66 calcified plaques (32 vessels) from 31 patients undergoing OCT-guided PCI with coronary CT angiography acquired as a standard of care were included. Coronary CT angiography and OCT images were matched using fiduciary points. Calcified plaques were reconstructed in three dimensions to calculate calcium volume. A Passing-Bablok regression analysis and the Bland-Altman method were used to assess agreement between imaging modalities.

Results

27 left anterior descending arteries and 5 right coronary arteries were analyzed. Median calcium volume by CT angiography and OCT were 18.23 mm 3 [IQR 8.09, 36.48] and 10.03 mm 3 [IQR 3.6, 22.88]. The Passing-Bablok analysis showed a proportional difference without a systematic difference (Coefficient A 0.08, 95% CI: −1.37 to 1.21, Coefficient B 1.61, 95% CI: 1.45 to 1.84); with a mean difference of 9.69 mm3 (LOA −10.2 mm 3 to 29.6 mm 3). No significant differences were observed for MLA: median value for CT 2.84 mm2 [IQR 2.03, 3.74] and for OCT 2.55 mm2 [IQR 1.91, 4.43].

Conclusions

Coronary CT angiography volumetric calcium evaluation overestimates calcium volume by 60% compared to OCT. Accounting for CT overestimation may allow for appropriate interpretation of calcific burden in the non-invasive setting. Coronary CT angiography may emerge as a tool to quantify calcium burden for invasive procedural planning.

Calcium burden comparison CT vs OCT

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None